DOCSLIB.ORG

Early Total Care

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Early Total Care Early Total Care Dave Laverty MD Case • 24 yo female • MVC • Bilateral femur fractures • Left monteggia fracture • Right midfoot fracture dislocation • Nonoperative spleen injury • Initial Hgb 8.9 Background • Damage Control Orthopedics – External fixation, traction, splints • Early Total Care – Intramedullary nails, plates and screws • Early Appropriate Care – Physiology based treatment Background • History – 1960’s • Immediate stabilization of long-bones in polytrauma was common • Retrospective data showed unacceptably high mortality rate • Major concern was fat emboli / cardiopulmonary dysfunction • Due to this, surgery was delayed… 10-14 days • Patient’s were treated with casts, splints, and traction – Delays led to… • Immobilization / Bedrest • Pneumonia • Persistent pain • Decubitus ulcers • Psychological disturbances • Disuse atrophy (leading to later difficulty with therapy/mobilizing) • GI disorders, leading to aspiration • Longer ICU stays Backgrouond • History – 1980’s • Studies showed a link between delayed long-bone fixation in polytrauma patients and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) • Better outcomes when femur fracture treated in 1st few days after admission • Bone et al published landmark research showing decreased incidence of ARDS and mortality with early fixation • Due to this, time spent in traction decreased from 9- days to 2-days Backgound • History – Term “damage control” was 1st used by U.S. Navy to describe tactics needed to keep a ship afloat when compromised – Adopted by general surgery trauma for certain techniques, such as packing to stop hemorrhage (rather than lengthy immediate repair) • Allowing for physiology to improve before definitive treatment • Leading to improved survival rates – Next, adopted by ORS for DC orthopaedics Background • History – Studies • Scalea et al – 43 polytrauma patients – 46% had head injuries, 65% had HD instability – DCO had minimal complications, improved survival • Taeger et al • Pape et al • Morshed et al – Retrospective review of 3,069 patients – Definitive stabilization done within 12hrs = high mortality – Waiting >12hrs decreased mortality by 50% DCO • So it seems Damage Control is the way to go! But wait…… • Need to compare apples to apples • Not all trauma patients are the same • No doubt operating on • But, stabilizing long unstable, under bones early in resuscitated patients adequately resuscitated increases complications patients has major benefits First Hit, Second Hit First Hit Second hit • The trauma itself • What we do with – Massive inflammatory surgery response – Increased blood loss – Ongoing blood loss – Hypotension – Pain – Potential for fat emboli – Inflammatory process “tipped over the edge” We need a talented, smart leader to help us win! When is the right time to stabilize fractures?? • Coopwood: “you can • Books: take them if we are not – Improving acidosis actively resuscitating” – pH >7.25 – Base excess of -5.5 – Lactate <4.0 • Considerations: – Head injury – Other active medical issues (CVA/AMI) Early Appropriate Care • If we hit our resuscitation indicators: – Definitive fixation of pelvis, acetabulum, femur and +/- spine fractures within 36 hours Head Injury • Severe – Depends on ICP, CPP • ICP <20 = definitive surgery • CPP >70 = definitive surgery • If neither = DCO Chest Injury • Massive = consider DCO • Compensated and resuscitated = definitive fixation – Decreased pain – Upright posture – Promotes mobilization Abdominal Injury • Collaborative effort with trauma team • Life threatening injuries first • Determines DCO versus ETC/EAC So how it really works…. • Life saving measures by trauma team • Assess mitigating factors (head injury, soft tissue injury, medical issues) • Evaluate level of resuscitation If “not actively resuscitating” • Femur fracture = IMN • Tibia fracture = IMN • Humerus fracture = ORIF • Forearm fracture = ORIF • Pelvis fracture = binder/traction • Hand/wrist = splint • Ankle = ex fix, possible ORIF • Foot – splint • Other peri-articular – ex fix, planned staged management If actively resuscitating • External fixation – In OR or ICU • Femoral traction • Pelvic binder • Splinting • Wound VAC Case • Bilateral femur fracture – IMN • Midfoot fracture dislocation – ORIF • Monteggia fracture – ORIF Conclusion • Truly collaborative effort • Need to have all resources readily available • Match the treatment to the patient Thank You .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2012-2013 Research Abstracts CASE SURGERY a Compilation of Investigations Made by Case Surgery Physicians, Research Scientists and Distinguished Colleagues
    2012-2013 Research Abstracts CASE SURGERY A compilation of investigations made by Case Surgery physicians, research scientists and distinguished colleagues. 12-13Abstracts.indd 1 10/22/13 12:51 PM Dear Colleague: I am pleased to share with you our 2012-2013 research abstracts. The Department of Surgery provides a multi-specialty academic environment where ideas are exchanged and cooperative research programs are planned. The 2012-13 academic year has been a productive one for the Department and its members. The work produced has been presented at national and international forums and published in prestigious journals. The Department of Surgery will continue to expand its research and educational endeavors in the coming year. We welcome your interest in our Department’s research and clinical studies. If you would like additional information, please call 216.844.3209 or visit our website at www.casesurgery.com. Sincerely, Jeffrey L. Ponsky, MD Oliver H. Payne Professor and Chair 12-13Abstracts.indd 2 10/22/13 12:51 PM Special thanks to the Case School of Medicine Biologic Research Unit for their continued support. Section 1: Cardiac Surgery CONCURRENT ASYMPTOMATIC CARDIAC MYXOMA AND RENAL CELL CARCINOMA ......................................................................................................................... 3 Vineeta Gahlawat, MD, Yakov Elgudin, MD Table of Contents Table Section 2: Colorectal Surgery PROCESS IMPROVEMENT IN COLORECTAL SURGERY: MODIFICATIONS TO AN ESTABLISHED ENHANCED RECOVERY PROTOCOL ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Early Appropriate Care of Orthopaedic Injuries in Elderly Multiple-Trauma Patients Michael S
    Scientific Poster #115 Polytrauma OTA 2014 Early Appropriate Care of Orthopaedic Injuries in Elderly Multiple-Trauma Patients Michael S. Reich, MD; Andrea J. Dolenc, BS; Timothy A. Moore, MD; Heather A. Vallier, MD; MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA Background/Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate clinical predictors of complications in multiply injured elderly trauma patients with orthopaedic injuries. Previous work from our institution has established resuscitation parameters that minimize complications with early fracture management. Protocol recommendations included definitive management of mechanically unstable fractures of the pelvis, acetabulum, spine, and femur within 36 hours, provided the patient demonstrated a positive response to resuscitative efforts, including lactate <4.0, pH ≥7.25, or base excess (BE) ≥–5.5 mmol/L. This protocol has been applied to all skeletally mature patients, but patients with advanced age or preexisting medical issues may require unique parameters to mitigate risk of complications and mortality. Methods: Between October 2010 and March 2013, 376 skeletally mature patients with 426 unstable fractures of the pelvis (n = 73), acetabulum (n = 58), spine (n = 112), and/or proximal or diaphyseal femur fractures (n = 183) were treated at a Level I trauma center and were prospectively studied. Subgroups of patients age ≤30 years (n = 114) and ≥60 years (n = 37), treated within 36 hours of injury, were compared. Low-energy fractures were excluded. The ISS, Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification were determined. Lactate, pH, and BE were measured at 8-hour intervals and perioperatively. Complications included pneumonia, pulmonary embolism (PE), acute renal failure (ARF), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multiple organ failure (MOF), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), infection, sepsis, and death.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Care Management of Traumatic Brain Injury
    Critical care management of traumatic brain injury Handbook of Clinical Neurology 2017 Final submitted version corrected for changes during editorial processing (with the permission of the publishers) DK Menon1,* and A Ercole1 1Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge and Neurosciences/Trauma Critical Care Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital,Cambridge, UK *Corresponding author. Email dkm13@cam.ac.uk Abstract Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a growing global problem, which is responsible for a substantial burden of disability and death, and which generates substantial healthcare costs. High-quality intensive care can save lives and improve the quality of outcome. TBI is extremely heterogeneous in terms of clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and outcome. Current approaches to the critical care management of TBI are not underpinned by high-quality evidence, and many of the current therapies in use have not shown benefit in randomized control trials. However, observational studies have informed the development of authoritative international guidelines, and the use of multimodality monitoring may facilitate rational approaches to optimizing acute physiology, allowing clinicians to optimize the balance between benefit and risk from these interventions in individual patients. Such approaches, along with the emerging impact of advanced neuroimaging, genomics, and protein biomarkers, could lead to the development of precision medicine approaches to the intensive care management of TBI. 1 Introduction Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an important cause for admission to intensive care units (ICUs) in general, and to neurocritical care units in particular. National population-based figures for ICU caseload (as opposed to more specific stratification into mild, moderate, or severe TBI) are difficult to find, but the UK Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC, 2015) reported that in 2014{2015, approximately 2% of all ICU admissions and about 10% of admissions to neurocritical care units were due to TBI.
    [Show full text]
  • Complications Are Reduced with a Protocol to Standardize Timing of Fixation Based on Response to Resuscitation Heather A
    Vallier et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (2015) 10:155 DOI 10.1186/s13018-015-0298-1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Complications are reduced with a protocol to standardize timing of fixation based on response to resuscitation Heather A. Vallier1*, Timothy A. Moore1,2, John J. Como3, Patricia A. Wilczewski3, Michael P. Steinmetz4, Karl G. Wagner5, Charles E. Smith5, Xiao-Feng Wang1 and Andrea J. Dolenc1 Abstract Background: Our group developed a protocol, entitled Early Appropriate Care (EAC), to determine timing of definitive fracture fixation based on presence and severity of metabolic acidosis. We hypothesized that utilization of EAC would result in fewer complications than a historical cohort and that EAC patients with definitive fixation within 36 h would have fewer complications than those treated at a later time. Methods: Three hundred thirty-five patients with mean age 39.2 years and mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) 26.9 and 380 fractures of the femur (n = 173), pelvic ring (n = 71), acetabulum (n = 57), and/or spine (n = 79) were prospectively evaluated. The EAC protocol recommended definitive fixation within 36 h if lactate <4.0 mmol/L, pH ≥7.25, or base excess (BE) ≥−5.5 mmol/L. Complications including infections, sepsis, DVT, organ failure, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and pulmonary embolism (PE) were identified and compared for early and delayed patients and with a historical cohort. Results: All 335 patients achieved the desired level of resuscitation within 36 h of injury. Two hundred sixty-nine (80 %) were treated within 36 h, and 66 had protocol violations, treated on a delayed basis, due to surgeon choice in 71 %.
    [Show full text]
  • Fat Embolism Syndrome – a Qualitative Review of Its Incidence, Presentation, Pathogenesis and Management
    2-RA_OA1 3/24/21 6:00 PM Page 1 Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2021 Vol 15 No 1 Timon C, et al doi: https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2103.001 REVIEW ARTICLE Fat Embolism Syndrome – A Qualitative Review of its Incidence, Presentation, Pathogenesis and Management Timon C, MCh, Keady C, MSc, Murphy CG, FRCS Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited Date of submission: 12th November 2020 Date of acceptance: 05th March 2021 ABSTRACT DEFINITION AND INTRODUCTION Fat Embolism Syndrome (FES) is a poorly defined clinical Fat embolism 1 occurs when fat enters the circulation, this fat phenomenon which has been attributed to fat emboli entering can embolise and may or may not produce clinical the circulation. It is common, and its clinical presentation manifestations. may be either subtle or dramatic and life threatening. This is a review of the history, causes, pathophysiology, FES is a poorly defined clinical phenomenon which has been presentation, diagnosis and management of FES. FES mostly attributed to fat emboli entering the circulation. It classically occurs secondary to orthopaedic trauma; it is less frequently presents with respiratory, neurological and dermatological associated with other traumatic and atraumatic conditions. features. It typically occurs after long-bone fractures and There is no single test for diagnosing FES. Diagnosis of FES total hip arthroplasty, less frequently it is caused by burns is often missed due to its subclinical presentation and/or and soft tissue injuries 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Student Research Project
    Medical Student Research Project Supported by The John Lachman Orthopedic Research Fund and Supervised by the Orthopedic Department’s Office of Clinical Trials Acute Management of Open Long Bone Fractures: Clinical Practice Guidelines ELIZABETH ZIELINSKI, BS;1 SAQIB REHMAN, MD2 1Temple University School of Medicine; 2Temple University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Philadelphia, PA syndrome,1, 2 often resulting in loss of function of the limb. Abstract Infection rates can range from 0–50% depending on fracture Introduction: The acute management of an open frac- severity and location2–5 and nonunion rates are reported at an ture aims to promote bone and wound healing through a incidence of 18–29%.6, 7 Historically, amputation of the frac- series of key steps; however, lack of standardization in tured limb and mortality were commonly associated with these steps prior to definitive treatment may contribute to open fractures.8, 9 However, due to developments in its man- complications. agement, outcomes for open fractures have generally Methods: A literature review was conducted to deter- improved, as limbs are often salvaged and patients can retain mine the best practice in the acute management of open function of the injured extremity. Despite generalized stan- long bone fractures to be implemented at Temple Univer- dards for open fracture treatment, there remains variation sity Hospital, with a primary focus on prophylactic anti- and controversy over the initial management of open frac- biotic administration, local antibiotic delivery, time to tures, which may contribute to complications following debridement and irrigation techniques. treatment. Results: A computerized search yielded 2,037 results, Open fractures occur when the fractured bone penetrates of which a total of 21 articles were isolated and reviewed through the skin, involving damage to the bone and soft tis- based on the study criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Timing of Femur Fracture Stabilization in Polytrauma Patients: a Practice Management Guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma
    GUIDELINES Optimal timing of femur fracture stabilization in polytrauma patients: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Rajesh R. Gandhi, MD, Tiffany L. Overton, MPH, Elliott R. Haut, MD, PhD, Brandyn Lau, MPH, Heather A. Vallier, MD, Thomas Rohs, MD, Erik Hasenboehler, MD, Jane Kayle Lee, MD, Darrell Alley, MD, Jennifer Watters, MD, Frederick B. Rogers, MD, and Shahid Shafi, MD, Fort Worth, Texas BACKGROUND: Femur fractures are common among trauma patients and are typically seen in patients with multiple injuries resulting from high-energy mechanisms. Internal fixation with intramedullary nailing is the ideal method of treatment; however, there is no consensus regarding the optimal timing for internal fixation. We critically evaluated the literature regarding the benefit of early (G24 hours) versus late (924 hours) open reduction and internal fixation of open or closed femur fractures on mortality, infection, and venous thromboem- bolism (VTE) in trauma patients. METHODS: A subcommittee of the Practice Management Guideline Committee of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis for the earlier question. RevMan software was used to generate forest plots. Grading of Recom- mendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology was used to rate the quality of the evidence, using GRADEpro software to create evidence tables. RESULTS: No significant reduction in mortality was associated with early stabilization, with a risk ratio (RR) of 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50Y1.08). The quality of evidence was rated as ‘‘low.’’ No significant reduction in infection (RR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.10Y1.6) or VTE (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.37Y1.07) was associated with early stabilization.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthopaedic Injuries from Snowmobile Accidents: a Multi-Centre Analysis Of
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology (2019) 29:1617–1621 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02514-3 ORIGINAL ARTICLE • EMERGENCY - TRAUMA Orthopaedic injuries from snowmobile accidents: a multi‑centre analysis of demographics, injury patterns, and outcomes Paul Whiting1 · Christopher Rice1 · Alexander Siy1 · Benjamin Wiseley1 · Natasha Simske1 · Richard Berg2 · Madeline Lockhart1 · Abbey Debruin1 · David Polga2 · Christopher Doro1 · David Goodspeed1 · Gerald Lang1 Received: 30 April 2019 / Accepted: 22 July 2019 / Published online: 29 July 2019 © Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Purpose More than 2 million people in North America use snowmobiles, resulting in an estimated 200 fatalities and 14,000 injuries annually. The purpose of this study is to document the demographics, orthopaedic injury patterns, and short-term outcomes of patients with snowmobile-related injuries. Materials and methods A retrospective review was performed at two regional trauma centres in a region where snowmobile use is prevalent. Patients who sustained snowmobile-related injuries over a 12-year period were identifed from the hospitals’ trauma registries using E-codes (E820-E820.9). Patient demographics were recorded, as were injury characteristics including rates of substance use, open fractures, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) for the extremities, and mortality. Rates of inpatient surgery, as well as hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS), were also recorded. Results We identifed 528 patients with snowmobile-related injuries. Average age was 37 years, and 418 patients (79%) were male. Eighty-eight per cent of all patients with snowmobile injuries were admitted to the hospital with an average LOS of 5.7 days.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Prompt-Individualised-Safe Management' (PR.ISM)
    This is a repository copy of Time to think outside the box: ‘Prompt-Individualised-Safe Management’ (PR.I.S.M.) should prevail in patients with multiple injuries. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/116776/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Giannoudis, PV, Giannoudis, VP and Horwitz, DS (2017) Time to think outside the box: ‘Prompt-Individualised-Safe Management’ (PR.I.S.M.) should prevail in patients with multiple injuries. Injury, 48 (7). pp. 1279-1282. ISSN 0020-1383 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.05.026 © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing eprints@whiterose.ac.uk including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. eprints@whiterose.ac.uk https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Accepted Manuscript Title: Time to think outside the box: ‘Prompt-Individualised-Safe Management’ (PR.I.S.M.) should prevail in patients with multiple injuries Authors: P.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Anesthesia for Orthopedic Trauma
    10 Anesthesia for Orthopedic Trauma Jessica A. Lovich-Sapola and Charles E. Smith Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Department of Anesthesia, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland USA 1. Introduction Orthopedic trauma surgeons realize the tremendous importance of coordinated care at trauma centers and by trauma systems. The anesthesiologist is an important link in the coordinated approach to orthopedic trauma care. “Musculoskeletal injuries are the most frequent indication for operative management in most trauma centers.” Trauma management of a multiply-injured patient includes early stabilization of long-bone, pelvic, and acetabular fractures, provided that the patient has been adequately resuscitated. (Miller, 2009) Early stabilization leads to reduced pain and improved outcomes. (Smith, 2008) Studies have shown that failure to stabilize these fractures leads to increased morbidity, pulmonary complications, and increased length of hospital stay. (Miller, 2009) “Life threatening and limb-threatening musculoskeletal injuries should be addressed emergently.” (Smith, 2008) The chapter will discuss the following orthopedic trauma anesthesia issues: Pre-operative evaluation Airway management including difficult airways and cervical spine precautions Intra-operative monitoring Anesthetic agents and techniques (regional vs general anesthesia) Intra-operative complications (hypotension, blood loss, hypothermia, fat embolism syndrome) Post-operative pain management 2. Pre-operative evaluation Orthopedic trauma patients can be challenging for Anesthesiologists. These patients can range in age from young to the elderly, may have multiple co-morbid medical conditions, and even a previously healthy patient may have trauma-associated injuries that may have a significant impact on the anesthetic plan. The Anesthesiologist’s role is to evaluate the entire patient, with particular focus on the cardiovascular, respiratory, and other major organ system function.
    [Show full text]
  • S13049-021-00922-1.Pdf
    Eichinger et al. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (2021) 29:100 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00922-1 REVIEW Open Access Challenges in the PREHOSPITAL emergency management of geriatric trauma patients – a scoping review Michael Eichinger1* , Henry Douglas Pow Robb2, Cosmo Scurr3, Harriet Tucker4, Stefan Heschl5 and George Peck6 Abstract Background: Despite a widely acknowledged increase in older people presenting with traumatic injury in western populations there remains a lack of research into the optimal prehospital management of this vulnerable patient group. Research into this cohort faces many uniqu1e challenges, such as inconsistent definitions, variable physiology, non-linear presentation and multi-morbidity. This scoping review sought to summarise the main challenges in providing prehospital care to older trauma patients to improve the care for this vulnerable group. Methods and findings: A scoping review was performed searching Google Scholar, PubMed and Medline from 2000 until 2020 for literature in English addressing the management of older trauma patients in both the prehospital arena and Emergency Department. A thematic analysis and narrative synthesis was conducted on the included 131 studies. Age-threshold was confirmed by a descriptive analysis from all included studies. The majority of the studies assessed triage and found that recognition and undertriage presented a significant challenge, with adverse effects on mortality. We identified six key challenges in the prehospital field that were summarised in this review. Conclusions: Trauma in older people is common and challenges prehospital care providers in numerous ways that are difficult to address. Undertriage and the potential for age bias remain prevalent.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns, Management and Outcome of Traumatic Femur Frac- Ture: Exploring the Experience of the Only Level 1 Trauma Cen- Ter in Qatar
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 15 April 2021 Article Patterns, Management and Outcome of Traumatic Femur Frac- ture: Exploring the experience of the only Level 1 Trauma Cen- ter in Qatar Syed Imran Ghouri1, Mohammad Asim2, Fuad Mustafa3, Ahad Kanbar3, Mohamed Ellabib3, Hisham Al Jogol3, Mo- hammed Muneer4, Nuri Abdurraheim3, Atirek Pratap Goel3, Husham Abdelrahman3, Hassan Al-Thani5, Ayman El-Menyar2,6 1 Department of Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar (ims2311@rediffmail.com) 2 Clinical research, Trauma and Vascular Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, PO Box 3050, Qatar (masim1@hamad.qa) 3 Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar (fmustafa2@hamad.qa); (akanbar@hamad.qa); (mellabib@hamad.qa); (hjogol@hotmail.com); (hushamco@hotmail.com); (nabdurraheim@hamad.qa); (agoel@hamad.qa) 4 Department of Surgery, Plastic Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar (mmyousif78@yahoo.com) 5 Department of Surgery, Trauma and Vascular Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar (althanih@hotmail.com) 6 Department of Clinical Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Doha, PO Box 24144 Qatar (aelmenyar@hamad.qa) * Correspondence Ayman El-Menyar, MD Trauma & Vascular Surgery Section, Hamad Medical Corporation & Weill Cornell Med- ical College, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar Tel: 0097444396130 E-mail: aymanco65@yahoo.com Abstract: Background: We aimed to describe the patterns, management, and outcome of traumatic femoral shaft fractures. Methods: An observational descriptive retrospective study was conducted for all trauma patients admitted with femoral shaft fractures between January 2012 and December 2015 at the only level 1 trauma center and tertiary hospital in the country.
    [Show full text]