Northern Karamoja Growth, Health and Governance (GHG) Project Funded by USAID/Food for Peace (FFP) Quarter 7 Report: January 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Northern Karamoja Growth, Health and Governance (GHG) Project Funded by USAID/Food for Peace (FFP) Quarter 7 Report: January 1 Northern Karamoja Growth, Health and Governance (GHG) Project Funded by USAID/Food for Peace (FFP) Quarter 7 Report: January 1 – March 31, 2014 COUNTRY CONTACT HEADQUARTERS CONTACT PROJECT SUMMARY Name: Sean Granville-Ross Name: Nate Oetting Award No. AID-FFP-A-12-00006 Country Director Senior Program Officer Start Date July 19, 2012 Plot 1102 Nsambya 45 SW Ankeny End Date July 18, 2017 PO Box 32021 Clock Tower Portland, Oregon, USA Report Date Jan - March 2014 Kampala, Uganda Phone: +256 414 501 014 Phone: +1(503) 796-6800 Total Award $ 52,116,900 Fax: +256 414 501 011 Fax: +1 (503) 796-6844 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] 1 1. Program Overview The 1.2 million inhabitants of the Karamoja sub-region of northeastern Uganda face a slow crisis produced by the breakdown of their traditional agro-pastoralist livelihood strategy, repeated climactic shocks and ongoing insecurity from cattle raiding. The decay of social norms and institutions, such as elder authority and the meaningful, active role of young men and women in tribal culture, inevitably accompany the crisis, as does malnutrition for children, high rates of gender based violence, and gender inequality. It is difficult to overstate the challenges facing the Karamojong. Those challenges are, however, matched by opportunities for long-term development with the potential for significant impact on the food insecure. Since 2010, four successive large harvests have filled village granaries in many areas, and the security situation is improving thanks to successful military and NGO disarmament and peacebuilding efforts. Although pockets of severe food insecurity persist (particularly in Kaabong district), in recognition of the sub-region’s overall development, emergency humanitarian efforts are scaling down, leaving a gap for more development-focused interventions to fill. There is a peace dividend waiting to be realized in Karamoja. The Northern Karamoja Growth, Health and Governance (GHG) project was designed to capitalize on this pivotal moment through a range of economic, health, and governance initiatives that will cement the gains from increased security and build a foundation for broader self-sufficiency, while well targeted food aid for pregnant and lactating women and children under the age of two hastens the process of transition from decades of food aid by filling nutrition deficits in highly food insecure households. GHG’s geographical focus includes the northernmost three Karamojong districts of Kaabong, Kotido and Abim, home to approximately 540,000 individuals. The GHG consortium pulls several complementary capacities into one coherent, unified approach, embodied in the facilitative approach that pushes local actors out front to sustainably provide the products (e.g., seeds and energy) and services (e.g., land opening, animal husbandry, transport, security, finance and healthcare) that make life productive and meaningful in the 21st century. As the consortium lead, Mercy Corps takes overall responsibility for the development of GHG’s facilitative strategy as well as the quality of all programming implemented by the project. Mercy Corps also implements all economic programming and employs a fulltime Gender 2 Advisor to ensure that an understanding of Karamoja’s complicated gender dynamics are incorporated into all activities. World Vision Inc. (WV), with its robust commodity management and public health qualifications, is leading supplementary feeding activities, community-level public health initiatives, and water, sanitation and hygiene programming. An extraordinarily knowledgeable local partner, Kaabong Peace and Development Agency (KAPDA), constitutes the spear tip for GHG’s conflict management and governance activities, working primarily through local formal and informal authority structures to bolster local systems for conflict reduction and government service improvement. Lastly, Tufts University’s Feinstein International Center (FIC) is charged with performing annual impact evaluations using its community-focused Participatory Impact Assessment methodology that will help the rest of the consortium partners understand the impact (or lack thereof) of their work. 2. Updates by Strategic Objective a. SO1: Pro-Poor Market Development Financial Access In an effort to improve the financial service landscape in Karamoja, Mercy Corps has partnered with Uganda Cooperative Savings and Credit Union (UCSCU) and jointly developed a detailed action plan to build the capacity of seven SACCOs. During the first round of trainings, UCSCU focused lessons on credit management, which reached 20 people (7 women, 13 men). The training provided SACCO management (chair person, managers, and loan committees) with a good understanding of credit management policy, development of loan approval authorization matrices, delinquency management, process of lending and loan data recording system to efficiently run and improve SACCO performance. UCSCU’s continued support has also helped SACCOs to have a fully functioning operational structure. For the first time, all partner SACCO records are updated with different ledgers such as savings, cash, loans and members’ ledgers. Likewise all appropriate management structures are in place and accountable to their members. Case Study Mr. Eliah Longole, Manager Nakapilimoru SACCO, said that they were on the verge of collapsing as their portfolio at risk was nearly 100% and members were starting to drop out. However, their partnership with GHG and particularly the capacity building support they received from UCSCU significantly turned things around. In the past one month alone, default rates reduced to 32 percent and savings increased from UGX 8 million to UGX 14,069,700UGX. Operational self-sufficiency also increased to 78 percent from 0 percent, according to GHG’s internal capacity rating, which now helps them to cover their operational expenses. This progress has renewed confidence among members of the SACCO who have begun to save again. In addition, the SACCO has recruited 22 new members. Currently membership is at 210. “This is really an impressive start and with continued support from UCSCU and GHG we are confident that we can fully stand by our feet and become one of the strong financial service sectors in the district.” –Mr. Eliah Longole Equity Bank visited the seven SACCOs to look for possible partnership opportunities. If this partnership is realized then it will lead to accessibility of financial services to the unbanked and poor communities in which GHG is operating. 3 Agricultural inputs With the rainy season fast approaching, the agro-input team has continued to engage with retailers to help link them with UNADA and build their capacity on basic business skills needed to run agro-input related businesses. At the time of writing this report, 24 business people received a five-day training on business management. The training is delivered by UNADA and is expected to enhance capacity of retailers to have good understandings of business planning and management skills. Fifteen input retailers have established their own agent networks to help them aggregate demand at the grassroots level. On average, each retailer has four agents and in total GHG has facilitated the establishment of 59 agents in the distribution network. In addition to aggregating demand, some of the agents can be considered as model farmers as they will establish demo plots useful for learning purposes for a wider community. In this reporting period, eight retailers out of 15 have placed orders with national seed companies to procure different varieties of improved seeds that are suitable to the Karamoja agro-ecology zone. These retailers mobilized UGX 7.5 million and ordered a total of 2.2MT of assorted seeds form NASECO and PEARL national seed suppliers. Several agro input shops – selling improved seed varieties to small-holder farmers – were opened during the reporting period, the first of their kind in Karamoja. Despite a relatively small quantity of improved seeds procured by retailers for this agricultural season, it is a positive sign, and indication of significantly more sales in the future. For this season we estimate that over 5,500 farmers will buy improved seeds from retailers to cover over 8,000 acres of land. Exact information on numbers of beneficiaries and hectares cultivated will be reported in the next quarter. Among the many challenges confronted by the ago-input activity, ongoing free handouts of seeds by other actors have discouraged retailers from ordering large volumes of inputs for fear of lower demand. Animal Health During the quarter representatives from Norbrook (U) Ltd, the largest supplier of animal vaccines and medicines in Uganda, visited Karamoja and met with local businesses, CAHWs and livestock owners. That visit and the provision of essential market information by the GHG animal health team convinced Norbrook to jump at the opportunity to serve the Karamojong livestock market, and as a result, Norbrook made its first delivery of veterinary medicine to two drug distributors/retailers in northern Karamoja with a UGX 10 million credit extension and at factory price payable in one month. JICAHWA drug shop (Kotido) received supplies worth UGX 8,923,879. Of this, UGX 5,923,879 was on credit while UGX 3 million was cash on delivery. The other agrovet partner, Sago Vets (Abim) received veterinary medicine worth UGX 4,793,789 on credit. Delivery of veterinary medicines at factory/whole sale prices has advantages
Recommended publications
  • Karamoja and Northern Uganda Comparative Analysis of Livelihood Recovery in the Post-Conflict Periods November 2019
    Karamoja and Northern Uganda Comparative analysis of livelihood recovery in the post-conflict periods November 2019 Karamoja and Northern Uganda Comparative analysis of livelihood recovery in the post-conflict periods November 2019 Published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Tufts University Rome, 2019 REQUIRED CITATION FAO and Tufts University. 2019. Comparative analysis of livelihood recovery in the post-conflict periods – Karamoja and Northern Uganda. November 2019. Rome. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) or Tufts University concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO or the University in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO or the University. ISBN 978-92-5-131747-1 (FAO) ©FAO and Tufts University, 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Humanitarian Update
    UGANDA HUMANITARIAN UPDATE MAY – JUNE 2010 I. HIGHLIGHTS AMID HEAVY RAINS, HUMANITARIAN ACCESS IN PARTS OF KARAMOJA AND TESO HAMPERED BY DETERIORATING ROAD CONDITIONS OVER 1,000 CHOLERA CASES REGISTERED IN KARAMOJA SINCE APRIL 2010 90% OF IDPS IN NORTHERN UGANDA NO LONGER LIVING IN CAMPS, BUT LAND CONFLICTS AND LANDMINES IMPEDING RETURN IN SOME AREAS II. SECURITY AND ACCESS SECURITY The general situation in Karamoja remained fragile, according to the United Nations Department for Safety and Security (UNDSS). Cattle raids, including on protected kraals, particularly affected Moroto and Kotido, with some resulting in fierce clashes between the Uganda People’s Defence Forces and the raiders. In South Karamoja incidents associated with food distributions involved theft of food and non-food items (NFIs), and attacks on food distributors as well as on food recipients. Following three road ambushes in Alerek sub-county of Abim District during the month, UNDSS issued an advisory limiting UN movement along the Abim-Kotido road to between 09.00Hrs and 16.00Hrs with effect from 28 June 2010. Three civilians were killed in one of those ambushes. In northern Uganda, Amuru District officials and partners carried out a joint assessment in the wake of a violent land dispute that occurred in Koli village of Pabbo sub-county on 23 June. Preliminary findings indicated that one person was killed and several others injured in the dispute involving two clans. Some 40 huts were torched and many members of either clan had fled the village. Also of concern in the region during the reporting period were raids by illegally armed Karamojong, particularly in Pader District.
    [Show full text]
  • Karamoja Rapid Crop and Food Security Assessment
    KARAMOJA RAPID CROP AND FOOD SECURITY ASSESSMENT KAMPALA, AUGUST 2013 This Rapid Assessment was conducted by: World Food Programme (WFP) - Elliot Vhurumuku; Hamidu Tusiime; Eunice Twanza; Alex Ogenrwoth; Swaleh Gule; James Odong; and Joseph Ndawula Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) - Bernard Onzima; Joseph Egabu; Paddy Namurebire; and Michael Lokiru Office of the Prime Minister (OPM) - Johnson Oworo; Timothy Ojwi; Jimmy Ogwang; and Catherine Nakalembe Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries (MAAIF) - James Obo; and Stephen Kataama Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 2 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Background .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.2. Objectives ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.3. Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1. Sampling methodology .................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2. Selection of respondents ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 Ehealth MONTHLY BULLETIN
    WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 eHEALTH MONTHLY BULLETIN Welcome to this 1st issue of the eHealth Bulletin, a production 2015 of the WHO Country Office. Disease October November December This monthly bulletin is intended to bridge the gap between the Cholera existing weekly and quarterly bulletins; focus on a one or two disease/event that featured prominently in a given month; pro- Typhoid fever mote data utilization and information sharing. Malaria This issue focuses on cholera, typhoid and malaria during the Source: Health Facility Outpatient Monthly Reports, Month of December 2015. Completeness of monthly reporting DHIS2, MoH for December 2015 was above 90% across all the four regions. Typhoid fever Distribution of Typhoid Fever During the month of December 2015, typhoid cases were reported by nearly all districts. Central region reported the highest number, with Kampala, Wakiso, Mubende and Luweero contributing to the bulk of these numbers. In the north, high numbers were reported by Gulu, Arua and Koti- do. Cholera Outbreaks of cholera were also reported by several districts, across the country. 1 Visit our website www.whouganda.org and follow us on World Health Organization, Uganda @WHOUganda WHO UGANDA eHEALTH BULLETIN February 2016 Typhoid District Cholera Kisoro District 12 Fever Kitgum District 4 169 Abim District 43 Koboko District 26 Adjumani District 5 Kole District Agago District 26 85 Kotido District 347 Alebtong District 1 Kumi District 6 502 Amolatar District 58 Kween District 45 Amudat District 11 Kyankwanzi District
    [Show full text]
  • Killing the Goose That Lays the Golden Egg
    KILLING THE GOOSE THAT LAYS THE GOLDEN EGG An Analysis of Budget Allocations and Revenue from the Environment and Natural Resource Sector in Karamoja Region Caroline Adoch Eugene Gerald Ssemakula ACODE Policy Research Series No.47, 2011 KILLING THE GOOSE THAT LAYS THE GOLDEN EGG An Analysis of Budget Allocations and Revenue from the Environment and Natural Resource Sector in Karamoja Region Caroline Adoch Eugene Gerald Ssemakula ACODE Policy Research Series No.47, 2011 Published by ACODE P. O. Box 29836, Kampala Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Website: http://www.acode-u.org Citation: Adoch, C., and Ssemakula, E., (2011). Killing the Goose that Lays the Golden Egg: An Analysis of Budget Allocations and Revenue from the Environment and Natural Resource Sector in Karamoja Region. ACODE Policy Research Series, No. 47, 2011. Kampala. © ACODE 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. ACODE policy work is supported by generous donations and grants from bilateral donors and charitable foundations. The reproduction or use of this publication for academic or charitable purposes or for purposes of informing public policy is excluded from this restriction. ISBN 978997007077 Contents LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................. v LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • KOTIDO District Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Profile August 2014
    THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA KARAMOJA KOTIDO District HAzArd, risk And VulnerAbility Profile August 2014 KOTIDO HAZARD, RISK AND VULNERABILITY PROFILE | i With support from: United Nations Development Programme Plot 11, Yusuf Lule Road P.O. Box 7184 Kampala, Uganda For more information: www.undp.org ii | KOTIDO HAZARD, RISK AND VULNERABILITY PROFILE Contents Acronyms.....................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgement........................................................................................................1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 3 Objectives...... .............................................................................................................3 Methodology ................................................................................................................3 Overview of the District ...............................................................................................6 Brief district history ..................................................................................................6 Location and administrative structure ......................................................................6 Ethnicity ....................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation Status & Results
    The World Bank Report No: ISR13907 Implementation Status & Results Uganda Second Northern Uganda Social Action Fund Project (NUSAF2) (P111633) Operation Name: Second Northern Uganda Social Action Fund Project Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 8 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 03-May-2014 (NUSAF2) (P111633) Public Disclosure Authorized Country: Uganda Approval FY: 2009 Product Line:IBRD/IDA Region: AFRICA Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Key Dates Public Disclosure Copy Board Approval Date 28-May-2009 Original Closing Date 31-Aug-2014 Planned Mid Term Review Date 30-Jan-2012 Last Archived ISR Date 19-Nov-2013 Effectiveness Date 25-Nov-2009 Revised Closing Date 31-Aug-2014 Actual Mid Term Review Date 14-Jun-2013 Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) To improve access of beneficiary households in Northern Uganda to income earning opportunities and better basic socio-economic services. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Yes No Public Disclosure Authorized Component(s) Component Name Component Cost Livelihood Investment Support 60.00 Community Infrastructure Rehabilitation 30.00 Institutional Development 10.00 Overall Ratings Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory Satisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory Public Disclosure Authorized Overall Risk Rating Implementation Status Overview The NUSAF II project originally planned to finance 9750 (i.e. 8000 Household Income Support (HIS), 1000 Public Works (PW) and 750 Community Infrastructure Rehabilitation) sub projects in the five year of its implementation period. As of February 3, 2013 a total of 8,764 subprojects (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Forests, Livelihoods and Poverty Alleviation: the Case of Uganda Forests, Livelihoods and Poverty Alleviation: the Case of Uganda
    Forests, livelihoods and poverty alleviation: the case of Uganda Forests, livelihoods and poverty alleviation: the case of Uganda G. Shepherd and C. Kazoora with D. Mueller Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2013 The Forestry Policy and InstitutionsWorking Papers report on issues in the work programme of Fao. These working papers do not reflect any official position of FAO. Please refer to the FAO Web site (www.fao.org/forestry) for official information. The purpose of these papers is to provide early information on ongoing activities and programmes, to facilitate dialogue and to stimulate discussion. The Forest Economics, Policy and Products Division works in the broad areas of strenghthening national institutional capacities, including research, education and extension; forest policies and governance; support to national forest programmes; forests, poverty alleviation and food security; participatory forestry and sustainable livelihoods. For further information, please contact: Fred Kafeero Forestry Officer Forest Economics, Policy and Products Division Forestry Department, FAO Viale Delle terme di Caracalla 00153 Rome, Italy Email: [email protected] Website: www.fao.org/forestry Comments and feedback are welcome. For quotation: FAO.2013. Forests, Livelihoods and Poverty alleviation: the case of Uganda, by, G. Shepherd, C. Kazoora and D. Mueller. Forestry Policy and Institutions Working Paper No. 32. Rome. Cover photo: Ankole Cattle of Uganda The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression af any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Health Fiscal and Growth Stabilization and Development
    LIST OF COVID-19 QUARANTINE CENTRES IN WATER AND POWER UTILITIES OPERATION AREAS WATER S/N QUARANTINE CENTRE LOCATION POWER UTILITY UTILITY 1 MASAFU GENERAL HOSPITAL BUSIA UWS-E UMEME LTD 2 BUSWALE SECONDARY SCHOOL NAMAYINGO UWS-E UMEME LTD 3 KATAKWI ISOLATION CENTRE KATAKWI UWS-E UMEME LTD 4 BUKWO HC IV BUKWO UWS-E UMEME LTD 5 AMANANG SECONDARY SCHOOL BUKWO UWS-E UMEME LTD 6 BUKIGAI HC III BUDUDA UWS-E UMEME LTD 7 BULUCHEKE SECONDARY SCHOOL BUDUDA UWS-E UMEME LTD 8 KATIKIT P/S-AMUDAT DISTRICT KATIKIT UWS-K UEDCL 9 NAMALU P/S- NAKAPIRIPIRIT DISTRICT NAMALU UWS-K UEDCL 10 ARENGESIEP S.S-NABILATUK DISTRICT ARENGESIEP UWS-K UEDCL 11 ABIM S.S- ABIM DISTRICT ABIM UWS-K UEDCL 12 KARENGA GIRLS P/S-KARENGA DISTRICT KARENGA UWS-K UMEME LTD 13 NAKAPELIMORU P/S- KOTIDO DISTRICT NAKAPELIMORU UWS-K UEDCL KOBULIN VOCATIONAL TRAINING CENTER- 14 NAPAK UWS-K UEDCL NAPAK DISTRICT 15 NADUNGET HCIII -MOROTO DISTRICT NADUNGET UWS-K UEDCL 16 AMOLATAR SS AMOLATAR UWS-N UEDCL 17 OYAM OYAM UWS-N UMEME LTD 18 PADIBE IN LAMWO DISTRICT LAMWO UWS-N UMEME LTD 19 OPIT IN OMORO OMORO UWS-N UMEME LTD 20 PABBO SS IN AMURU AMURU UWS-N UEDCL 21 DOUGLAS VILLA HOSTELS MAKERERE NWSC UMEME LTD 22 OLIMPIA HOSTEL KIKONI NWSC UMEME LTD 23 LUTAYA GEOFREY NAJJANANKUMBI NWSC UMEME LTD 24 SEKYETE SHEM KIKONI NWSC UMEME LTD PLOT 27 BLKS A-F AKII 25 THE EMIN PASHA HOTEL NWSC UMEME LTD BUA RD 26 ARCH APARTMENTS LTD KIWATULE NWSC UMEME LTD 27 ARCH APARTMENTS LTD KIGOWA NTINDA NWSC UMEME LTD 28 MARIUM S SANTA KYEYUNE KIWATULE NWSC UMEME LTD JINJA SCHOOL OF NURSING AND CLIVE ROAD JINJA 29 MIDWIFERY A/C UNDER MIN.OF P.O.BOX 43, JINJA, NWSC UMEME LTD EDUCATION& SPORTS UGANDA BUGONGA ROAD FTI 30 MAAIF(FISHERIES TRAINING INSTITUTE) NWSC UMEME LTD SCHOOL PLOT 4 GOWERS 31 CENTRAL INN LIMITED NWSC UMEME LTD ROAD PLOT 2 GOWERS 32 CENTRAL INN LIMITED NWSC UMEME LTD ROAD PLOT 45/47 CHURCH 33 CENTRAL INN LIMITED NWSC UMEME LTD RD CENTRAL I INSTITUTE OF SURVEY & LAND PLOT B 2-5 STEVEN 34 NWSC 0 MANAGEMENT KABUYE CLOSE 35 SURVEY TRAINING SCHOOL GOWERS PARK NWSC 0 DIVISION B - 36 DR.
    [Show full text]
  • A Monthly Newsletter on Food Security and Vulnerability in Uganda
    A Monthly Newsletter on Food Security and Vulnerability in Uganda Number 01/2001 15 January, 2001 Summary Relative calm in December enabled most people to return to their homes in Kabarole and Kasese Districts (western Uganda) following their displacement in late November after attacks by rebels of Allied Democratic Forces (ADF). Households are able to access their fields to harvest second-season crops, therefore maintaining food security in these districts. Since the beginning of the year, no significant rebel activities have occurred in Bundibugyo, Kabarole, and Kasese Districts, where near-normal security conditions were reported. UN agencies and other humanitarian organizations are actively involved these districts. An estimated 452,000 people have been displaced in Gulu and Kitgum Districts (northern Uganda) over the past decade due to attacks by the Lord’s Resistance Army. These people live in or close to internally displaced persons (IDPs) camps in the two Districts. Approximately 82 percent of the IDPs are camped in Gulu District while 18 percent are in Kitgum. The IDPs are able to return to their homes when rebel activities periodically subside. Average to above-average harvests for the second season (August to December) in most parts of Uganda improved household access to food as well as enhanced their food stocks, which are reportedly adequate generally. Except for the areas experiencing civil insecurity, where populations have been plagued by inadequate access to food, and drought-affected parts of Katakwi District, FEWS NET does not expect significant food shortages until the main season harvest in June/July 2001. Adequate soil moisture sustains vegetation, and ground water conditions are satisfactory in the southwestern cattle-rearing areas in Mbarara, Ntungamo, and Rakai Districts as well as in Kabale District, where many farmers practice dairy farming.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption and the Service Delivery Tragedy in Uganda Stories from the Eastern Leg of the Anti-Corruption Caravan
    1 THE ANTI-CORRUPTION CARAVAN Corruption and the Service Delivery Tragedy in Uganda Stories from the Eastern Leg of the Anti-Corruption Caravan September 2014 2 THE ANTI-CORRUPTION CARAVAN 3 THE ANTI-CORRUPTION CARAVAN About ActionAid Uganda ActionAid Uganda (AAU) is a National Development Organisation registered under the laws of Uganda and an Affiliate Member of the Action Aid International Federation. The Organization has been in operation in Uganda since 1982 working directly with citizens or their groups in civ¬il society to eradicate the injustice of pov-erty through addressing both the immedi¬ate needs (condition) as well as underlying obstacles (position) that militate against a life of dignity. The Organisation’s philosophy is built around two fundamental beliefs: a) that the injustice of poverty is a violation of human rights perpetuated by unequal power relations that permeate the entire social strata from the family level to global institutions; b) that the injustice of pov¬erty can be overcome through purposeful action by individuals acting on their own and or collectively with others. Central to our understanding of development is therefore an emphasis on the question of power and how it is exercised. The Anti Corruption Caravan reinforces not just ActionAid’s philosophy but directly contributes to the realisation of at least seven strategic objectives with the main programmatic entry point being mission priority three on ‘strengthening local democracy’. 4 THE ANTI-CORRUPTION CARAVAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ActionAid Uganda extends
    [Show full text]
  • North Karamoja Development Project Effectiveness Review Summary Report
    North Karamoja Development Project Effectiveness Review Summary Report Livelihood Support to Women’s Groups Oxfam GB Livelihoods Global Outcome Indicator December 2011 Acknowledgments We would like to thank the Oxfam Kotido team for their support in administering this evaluation. Thanks also to Kenneth Okital for managing the field work and data entry. Photo credits: Crispin Hughes and Caroline Gluck North Karamoja Development Project Effectiveness Review – Summary Report Executive Summary As per Oxfam Great Britain’s (OGB) Global Performance Framework (GPF), sufficiently mature projects are being randomly selected each year and their effectiveness rigorously assessed. Uganda’s Livelihood Diversification and Support Project was originally selected in this way under the livelihood strengthening thematic area. However, it was realised that this project was too immature to be subjected to an “effectiveness review”. Fortunately, it was identified as being connected to another project that is sufficiently mature, namely, the North Karamoja Development Project. Thus, a decision was taken to assess its effectiveness, including the extent to which it has promoted change in relation to OGB’s global livelihood outcome indicator: % of targeted households living on more than £1.00 per day per capita Through the North Karamoja Development Project and other complementary initiatives, OGB has been directly supporting 10 women’s groups, made up of over 400 members, in Kotido and Kaabong districts of Uganda’s Karamoja sub-region since 2007. This support primarily involved the construction and equipping of grain storage and milling facilities for each of the 10 groups and the provision of agricultural inputs and tools to their members. The women were also targeted with animal husbandry training, where they, among other things, were encouraged to utilise the services of animal health workers.
    [Show full text]