Legacy of Light: University Settlement 1886-2011
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Settlement Movement in New York City, 1886-1914
4\9b iN!o \\f1 \q~o THE SETTLEMENT HOUSE MOVEMENT IN NEW YORK CITY, 1886-1914 . HARRY P. KRAUS ARNO PRESS A New York Times Company New York • 1980 Editorial Supervision: St,eve Bedney F'ust publication in book form 1980 by Arno Press Inc. Copyright © 1980 by Harry P. Kraus Reproduced by pennission of Harry P. Kraus AMERICAN ETHNIC GROUPS: THE EUROPEAN HERITAGE ISBN for complete set: 0·405-15400-2 See last pages of this volume for titles Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Kraus, Harry P The settlement house movement in New York City, 1886-1914. (American ehhnic groups) Originally presented as the author I s thesis, New York university, 1970. 13ibllogra:PhY: p. i. Social settlements--New York (CitY)--Hist91'Y~ I. Title. II. Series. HV4196 .N6K7 1980 3te.5 '57'097471 80-872 lEEN 0-405-13434-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE PREFACE .•.•..••.....•...•••.........•. iii I. BACKGROUND ••••••••.••••••.••••.••••••·• 1 Definition Origins in ~ngland Development in the United Btates Settlement philoeophy II. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SETTLEMENT HOUSE IN NEW YORK CITy......................... 46 Pathfinders Pioneer settlement houses Development in New York ~ity III. PRACTICAL IDEALISTS................... 130 Types of settlement workers Background Motivation IV. THE SETTLEMENT AND THE COMMUNITy...... 152 Settlement programs Settlement influence Settlements and the Immigrant Settlements and the Negro V. SETTLEMENTS IN TRANSITION ••••••••• ;" •• 221 Factors: population movement, public agencies, new criteria f~r settlement personnel, institutionalism VI. THE SETTLEMENT EXPERIENCE............. 235 The slum dweller The settlement resident The community at large BIBLIOGRAPHY•••••••••••••••'••••••••••• 254- -v- and the Manuscript Division of the New York Public Library for their cooperation. -
Americanization and Cultural Preservation in Seattle's Settlement House: a Jewish Adaptation of the Anglo-American Model of Settlement Work
The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare Volume 26 Issue 3 September Article 3 September 1999 Americanization and Cultural Preservation in Seattle's Settlement House: A Jewish Adaptation of the Anglo-American Model of Settlement Work Alissa Schwartz Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw Part of the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation Schwartz, Alissa (1999) "Americanization and Cultural Preservation in Seattle's Settlement House: A Jewish Adaptation of the Anglo-American Model of Settlement Work," The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare: Vol. 26 : Iss. 3 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol26/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you by the Western Michigan University School of Social Work. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Americanization and Cultural Preservation in Seattle's Settlement House: A Jewish Adaptation of the Anglo-American Model of Settlement Work ALISSA SCHWARTZ New York City This articleexamines the dual agendas of Americanization and preserva- tion of Ashkenazic Jewish culture through an historicalanalysis of the work of Seattle's Settlement House, a social service center founded in 1906 by elite, Americanized Jews to serve poorer, immigrant Jews of Ashkenazic and Sephardic origin. Such analysis is set against the ideologicalbackdrop of Anglo-Americanism which pervaded the field of social work in its early efforts at self-definition and professionalization.Particular attention is paid to the role of the arts at Settlement House, with comparisons to Chicago's Hull-House, the prototypical American settlement operating at the turn of the century. This case study analyzes a German Jewish adaptationof an Anglo-American, Christian model of social work. -
West Bank Settlement Homes and Real Estate Occupation
Neoliberal Settlement as Violent State Project: West Bank Settlement Homes and Real Estate Occupation Yael Allweil Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning, Technion and Israel Institute for Advanced Studies [email protected] Abstract Intense ideological debates over the legal status of West Bank settlements and political campaigns objecting to or demanding their removal largely neglect the underlying capitalist processes that construct these settlements. Building upon the rich scholarship on the interrelations of militarism and capitalism, this study explores the relationship between capitalist and militarist occupation through housing development. Pointing to neoliberalism as central to the ways in which militarism and capitalism have played out in Israeli settlement dynamics since 1967, this paper unpacks the mutual dependency of the Israeli settlement project on real estate capitalism and neoliberal governance. Through historical study of the planning, financing, construction, and architecture of settlement dwellings as real estate, as well as interviews and analysis of settler-produced historiographies, this paper identifies the Occupied Territories (OT) as Israel’s testing ground for neoliberal governance and political economy. It presents a complementary historiography for the settlement project, identifying three distinct periods of settlement as the product of housing real estate: neoliberal experimentation (1967-1994), housing militarization (1994-2005), and “real-estate-ization” (2005-present). Drawing on Maron and Shalev -
LOWLINE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Karp Strategies with Replace Urban Studio Executive Summary
LOWLINE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Karp Strategies with rePlace Urban Studio Executive Summary The Lowline is a plan to build a green public space in an abandoned underground trolley terminal in the Lower East Side. Innovative solar technology will bring sunlight below ground into this one acre site. The Lowline collaborated with a consultant team to conduct focused community engagement of Lower East Side residents, businesses, and organizations from October 2016 through June 2017. This team held over 15 outreach events, including large public workshops, small focus groups, and youth training sessions, and deployed a digital platform to collect feedback from those who could not attend in person. At the conclusion of this phase of outreach, over 108,860 people directly engaged with the Lowline via these outreach activities and the Lowline lab. The primary findings that emerged from this work reveal that participants envision the future site as: a community-driven, inclusive, and free space; a space with many green and natural elements that can offer an oasis from the streets above; and a place for technological and environmental education, with a focus on youth empowerment. Participants also want to continue to have a say in the Lowline’s future development, programming, and operations. Lowline Community Engagement - July 2017 Karp Strategies | rePLACE Urban Studio 2 Lowline Community Engagement - July 2017 Karp Strategies | rePLACE Urban Studio 3 BACKGROUND • Project Background • Project Location • Community Snapshot • Engagement History • Community Input On Operations and Goverance This page left intentionally blank. Project Background The Lowline is an effort to build a lush, green public community space in an historic trolley terminal on the Lower East Side of New York City. -
Testimony of State Senator Daniel Squadron Regarding the Draft Annual Plan 2013 for the New York City Housing Authority, July 25, 2012
RANKING MEMBER INVESTIGATIONS AND GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS THE SENATE SOCIAL SERVICES DANIEL SQUADRON STATE OF NEW YORK COMMITTEES SENATOR, 25TH DISTRICT CODES CONSUMER PROTECTION CORPORATIONS, AUTHORITIES & COMMISSIONS FINANCE JUDICIARY TRANSPORTATION TESTIMONY OF STATE SENATOR DANIEL SQUADRON REGARDING THE DRAFT ANNUAL PLAN 2013 FOR THE NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, JULY 25, 2012. My name is Daniel Squadron and I represent the 25th Senate District in the New York State Senate. My district includes the Brooklyn neighborhoods of Greenpoint, Williamsburg, Vinegar Hill, Fulton Ferry, Brooklyn Heights, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens and Gowanus, and the Manhattan neighborhoods of Tribeca, Battery Park City, the Lower East Side, Chinatown, the Financial District, Little Italy, SoHo and the East Village. Thank you for the opportunity to testify at this hearing. Among the New Yorkers that I represent are the residents of 24 New York City Housing Authority Developments, spanning the Lower East Side, East Village, Willamsburg, and Chinatown. The Manhattan part of my district includes the Bernard Baruch Houses, Marianna Bracetti Houses, Pedro Albizu Campos, East 4th Street Rehab, First Houses, Samuel Gompers Houses, Rafael Hernandez Houses, Fiorello H. LaGuardia Houses, Lower East Side I, II, and III, Lower East Side Rehab, Max Meltzer Tower, Jacob Riis Houses, Henry Rutgers Houses, Seward Park Extension, Alfred E. Smith Houses, Two Bridges, Vladeck Houses, Lillian Wald Houses, and 45 Allen Street. In Brooklyn, I represent three developments: the Taylor Street-Wythe Avenue Houses, Williams Plaza, and Independence Towers. My constituents experience firsthand the challenges described by the New York City Alliance to Preserve Public Housing, and that is why I generally support the recommendations listed in the Alliance’s NYCHA FY 2013 Draft Annual Plan Position Statement. -
GUIDE to Applying for Public HOUSING REVISED December 2012
GUIDE TO APPLYING FOR PUBLIC HOUSING REVISED DECEMBER 2012 A. The New York City Housing Authority operates 334 developments in all five boroughs. All of our developments are NEW YORK CITY listed in this booklet. If you wish to be considered for any of these HOUSING AUTHORITY developments, please fill out an “Application for Apartment” form. B. IMPORTANT: No payment or fee should be given to anyone in connection with the preparation, filing or processing of an application for Public Housing. C. YOU ARE PROBABLY ELIGIBLE FOR AN APARTMENT IF: y The income of your family does not exceed the limits shown on the following page. y You meet NYCHA’s definition of family. The term “family” as used by the New York City Housing Authority includes the following: a. Two or more persons related by blood, marriage, domestic partnership, adoption, guardianship or court awarded custody. b. A single person. y Your admission to a public housing development will not endanger the welfare and safety of other residents. y You and your co-head are at least 18 years of age (the co-head must be your spouse or partner). To be eligible for a senior building, you or your co-head must be at least 62 years of age. D. PROCESSING OF APPLICATIONS Further description of the eligibility requirements for admission and the Authority’s Tenant Selection and Assignment Plan are available on our website or at the Customer Contact Centers listed below: 1. Bronx/Manhattan 2. Queens 3. Brooklyn/Staten Island Customer Contact Center Customer Contact Center Customer Contact Center 478 East Fordham Road, 2nd Floor 90-27 Sutphin Blvd., 4th Floor 787 Atlantic Avenue, 2nd Floor Bronx, NY 10458 Jamaica, NY 11435 Brooklyn, NY 11238 4. -
The Settlement House Tradition: Current Trends and Future Concerns
The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare Volume 30 Issue 2 June Article 4 June 2003 The Settlement House Tradition: Current Trends and Future Concerns Beverly Koerin Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw Part of the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation Koerin, Beverly (2003) "The Settlement House Tradition: Current Trends and Future Concerns," The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare: Vol. 30 : Iss. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol30/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you by the Western Michigan University School of Social Work. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Settlement House Tradition: Current Trends and Future Concerns BEVERLY KOERIN, MSW, PHD Virginia Commonwealth University School of Social Work The settlement tradition represents a comprehensive approach that "strengthens individual and neighborhood assets, and builds collective capacity to address community problems" (Hirota, Brown, & Martin, 1996, p. i). While there is a rich literature on the history of the settle- ment movement, there is little information about contemporarysettlement houses. This paper reports findings of a national survey of settlement houses/neighborhoodcenters that provide informationabout programsand services offered, populations served, unmet community needs, and policies or trends that contribute to or respond to these needs. In recent years, there have been calls within the social work profession for a return to our settlement house roots (e.g., Husock, 1993; Jacobson, 2001; Lundblad, 1995). In contrast to an individ- ualized and deficit-oriented approach, the settlement tradition represents a comprehensive approach that "strengthens individ- ual and neighborhood assets, and builds collective capacity to address community problems" (Hirota, Brown, & Martin, 1996, p. -
Rockislandpreservationcommiss
RRoocckk IIssllaanndd PPrreesseerrvvaattiioonn CCoommmmiissssiioonn Meeting Date: WWeeddnneessddaayy,, AApprriill 2277,, 22001111 Meeting Begins 5:15 p.m. Council Chamber Third Floor, Rock Island City Hall, 1528 3rd Avenue, Rock Island MEETING AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Welcome New Members Craig Kavensky and Italo Milani 4. Approval of the Minutes of the March 23, 2011 Regular Meeting 5. Approval of the Minutes of the March 31, 2011 Preliminary Determination Subcommittee Meeting 6. Public Hearing #2011-6 – Consideration of a Nomination for Landmark Designation for 427 7th Avenue, which is also known as the West End Settlement 7. Comment on Section 106 Review for 1900 3rd Avenue 8. Comment on Section 106 Review for 3000 24th Street 9. Update on CDBG Funding Match for 2011 CLG Grant 10. Centennial Bridge Visitor Center Saturday Volunteers for May-July 2011 11. Other Business 12. Adjournment Attachment West End Settlement Landmark Nomination Rock Island, Illinois > 309.732.2900 > www.rigov.org UNAPPROVED MINUTES OF THE ROCK ISLAND PRESERVATION COMMISSION Regular Meeting 4:00 p.m. March 23, 2011 Location: Personnel Conference Room, Rock Island City Hall, 1528 3rd Avenue, Rock Island, IL Attendance: ( X ) Present ( ) Absent ( ) Steve Andich ( X ) John Strieter ( X ) Bob Braun ( X ) Stephen Warren ( X ) Lendol Calder ( X ) Linda Anderson (Assoc.) ( X ) David Cordes ( ) Jeff Dismer (Assoc.) ( X ) Kent Cornish ( X ) Daryl Empen (Assoc.) ( X ) Jane Koski ( X ) Diane Oestreich (Assoc.) ( X ) Mark McVey Staff Present: Alan Carmen, Jill Doak, Ellen Adams Others Present: Paul Fessler, Brian Hollenback, Ben Reeder, Steven Schrock Note: Case numbers listed on the agenda packet were out of order; the case numbers in the minutes are correct. -
The Slave Galleries Restoration Project Case Study: St. Augustine's
The Slave Galleries Restoration Project Case Study: St. Augustine’s Episcopal Church and the Lower East Side Tenement Museum PREFACE BY ANIMATING DEMOCRACY The Slave Galleries Restoration Project points to the power of history—and particularly the historic site—as a catalyst for exploring contemporary issues. The ethnically diverse neighorhood of the Lower East Side of Manhattan has been created by the shifts and tensions of generations of immigrants living alongside American-born racial minorities. Oppression, domination of others, and efforts toward self-determination have alternated over time, as various groups have been used and exploited by other groups—some gaining a central role in the neighborhood, with THE SLAVE GALLERIES RESTORATION PROJECT CASE STUDY others remaining at the margins. Conflicts today on the Lower East Side continue over material resources like housing and schools as well as how groups are represented in the neighborhood’s history. The Slave Galleries Project was a collaboration between St. Augustine’s Episcopal Church and the Lower East Side Tenement Museum to restore and interpret the two slave galleries located in the church, cramped rooms where African American congregants were segregated during the nineteenth century. The project brought together community preservationists—leaders representing African American, Asian, Latino, Jewish, and other ethnic and religious groups— with scholars and preservationists to help restore and interpret the slave galleries as a catalyst for dialogue within the community. Over a year’s time, guided by two dialogue professionals experienced in intergroup relations, community preservationists talked first among themselves about issues of marginalization on the Lower East Side. They explored the meaning and use of the slave galleries, a powerful artifact of the history of segregation, as a space for dialogue for the larger Lower East Side community. -
Creating Garden Communities
Creating Garden Communities A NEW SET OF PRINCIPLES FOR MODERN TIMES Foreword In response to the Government’s announcement at At Stantec, we have significant experience of working the start of 2017 to use garden cities and towns as a on such developments including Kilnwood Vale in way of supporting much-needed housing delivery Crawley, Aylesbury Woodlands and, perhaps most across 14 key regions in the UK, Stantec launched a notably, Ebbsfleet where we have been involved for series of blogs to review the original principles of the over 25 years. We pride ourselves on creating garden city movement and discuss how these should communities where people want to live and, as garden be updated to be relevant to modern times. settlements offer a unique opportunity to do this, the questions and issues surrounding them are close to Whilst the Government has been supporting garden Stantec’s heart. settlements as one answer to the housing crisis, we wanted to investigate what is a ‘garden settlement’? We hope this collection of pieces will contribute to a How does it differ from the original vision of a garden better understanding of how garden style communities city, and what does this tell us about how to deliver can provide sustainable places where people want to better new communities? Each blog looked at a live, work and play — as well as contribute to meeting different key principle in making garden cities relevant future housing needs. to modern times including the benefits they offer and the challenges that stand in the way of their delivery. -
Embracing Gendered Space: How Women Manipulated the Settlement Home to Engage
Embracing Gendered Space: How Women Manipulated the Settlement Home to Engage in Progressive-Era Politics A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Beca R. Schumann April 2021 © 2021 Beca Renee Schumann. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled Embracing Gendered Space: How Women Manipulated the Settlement Home to Engage in Progressive-Era Politics by BECA R. SCHUMANN has been approved for the Political Science Department and the College of Arts and Sciences by Judith Grant Professor of Political Science Florenz Plassmann Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 Abstract BECA R. SCHUMANN, M.A., April 2021, Political Science Embracing Gendered Space: How Women Manipulated the Settlement Home to Engage in Progressive-Era Politics Director of Thesis: Judith Grant This research aims to insert the theory of gendered space into the narrative history of the American settlement movement by analyzing how settlement residents manipulated private spaces to engage in Progressive-Era politics. Hull House, the first settlement home, is used as a case study to demonstrate how female settlement residents utilized the settlement home as a hybrid public-private space to legitimize their social reform activities in urban areas. By embracing gendered spaces and cultural feminist beliefs about the natural role of women, settlement residents were able to effectively bargain for a more active role and voice in political life. Despite the social and political gains female settlement residents were able to achieve, their approach has been widely criticized by feminist scholars, since the embracing of gendered spaces and essentialist female traits continues to inhibit women from breaking free from structural forms of patriarchy. -
New York County
Line 112-CI-21 JUNE PRIMARY ELECTION – 2021 (SUBJECT TO CHANGE) POLL SITE LIST NEW YORK COUNTY 65th Assembly District 66th Assembly District 67th Assembly District 68th Assembly District 69th Assembly District 70th Assembly District ED SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS ED SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS ED SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS ED SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS ED SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS ED SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS 001 UASBYW ................................................ 81 NEW STREET 001 PS 89...............................................201 WARREN STREET 001 RIVER PLACE 1 ............................... 650 WEST 42 STREET 001 STANLEY ISAACS CENTER............. 415 EAST 93 STREET 001 FRANK MCCOURT HS ..................... 151 WEST 84 STREET 001 PS 185/PS 208 .................................. 20 WEST 111 STREET 002 UASBYW ................................................ 81 NEW STREET 002 PS 89...............................................201 WARREN STREET 002 ELIAS HOWE PRIMARY SCHL 51 MANHATTAN ...525 W 44 ST 002 STANLEY ISAACS CENTER............. 415 EAST 93 STREET 002 FRANK MCCOURT HS ..................... 151 WEST 84 STREET 002 CHARLES HILL TOWER ........................... 2050 8 AVENUE 003 ST MARGARET’S HOUSE ................. 49 FULTON STREET 003 PS 234 (INDEPENDENCE) ........292 GREENWICH STREET 003 RIVER PLACE 1 ............................... 650 WEST 42 STREET 003 SCHOOL OF CO-OP EDUCATION .... 321 EAST 96 STREET 003 FRANK MCCOURT HS ..................... 151 WEST 84 STREET 003 CHARLES HILL TOWER ........................... 2050 8 AVENUE 004 UASBYW