Legacy of Light: University Settlement 1886-2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Legacy of Light: University Settlement 1886-2011 Legacy OF LIGHT University Settlement Society of New York 184 Eldridge Street, New York, NY 10002 University Settlement: 1886–2011 A History of Social Change Find us online at UniversitySettlement.org, facebook.com/UniversitySettlement and at twitter.com/UnivSettlement 2 3 © 2012 University Settlement Photo credits: Cover and page 16: Andy Mars / Professional Women Photographers Page 28: Sean Sime Design: Tessa Zilla 4 5 Preface University Settlement is America’s first social settlement house, and the second in the world, first opening its doors to the low-income and immigrant population in the Low- er East Side of Manhattan in 1886. Today the organization serves more than 25,000 people at 21 sites throughout Manhattan and Brooklyn with a range of services includ- ing early childhood education and support for new par- ents, after-school programs, language classes, eviction prevention services, mental health support, services for older adults, arts programming and more. The following pages detail the history of Univer- sity Settlement’s first 125 years, from 1886 to 2011. The first section was written by the current Chief Executive Officer, Michael H. Zisser, who has held this position since 1988. The second section - University Settlement’s First Century - was written by historian and longtime Settle- ment supporter Jeffrey Scheuer and originally published in 1986. While the neighborhoods University Settlement serves, languages it hears and faces it sees have changed many times in the past 125 years, the spirit of what the Settlement does remains the same: to work with people as they make their way to a better life and create a stronger, more vibrant community. 6 1 LEGACY OF LIGHT: University Settlement’s Second Century 2 3 UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT ’ S SECOND CENTURY Legacy of Light: University Settlement’s in charitable giving – again benefitting the Settlement’s Second Century expanded activities. But several forces have worked in opposition to this growth. Periodic fiscal crises have created damaging Originally published in 1986, Legacy of Light beautifully downturns in the economy, which always affect lower described the history of the Settlement’s first 100 years income families far more dramatically than families within the social context that affected and was affected with more resources. Many areas of the country have by the Settlement’s involvement with the City and larger become increasingly fiscally conservative, one result of society. University Settlement and the settlement move- which is that downsizing resources for publically support- ment were powerful forces during the Progressive Era, ed programs has become a powerful rallying message. during the critical years framed by the two World Wars, The progress made in tackling critical social issues may and throughout the formation of the Great Society and suffer national setbacks if an appropriate balance of War on Poverty era. resources and government investments is not resolved. What has been the context of the past twenty-five The larger context has NOT changed in two impor- years, and what can we expect next? tant matters. First, more than at any point in the country’s While University Settlement’s mission has remained history, this is a nation of immigrants. University Settlement the same, the past twenty-five years have seen a shift began in the golden age of immigration in the late 19th in the context in which we operate. There has been century, but in fact a greater percentage of our popu- a dramatic increase in the number and scale of lation today is represented by first and second genera- programs sponsored by the public sector – either as tion immigrants. Second, there is not as yet full equality entitlement programs or as targeted programs serving in how voices are weighted on key questions affecting a particular need or population. A more engaged our local and national communities. Advocacy with and government, irrespective of political orientation, has on behalf of those whose voices need to be heard with led to a sizeable expansion of the role and finan- greater prominence has always been and will continue cial capacity of the non-profit sector. University to be part of University Settlement’s mission. Settlement, and the communities we serve, have The story of the past twenty-five years is one of trans- benefitted from this growth in the public sector formation and reaffirmation. It is the story of a neighbor- in many areas. The country has also generated hood comeback through community activism and the increased wealth for many individuals and corpora- partnership of many across the public and private sec- tions, which in turn has led to substantial increases tors. It is also the story of an organization that embodies 4 5 UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT ’ S SECOND CENTURY UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT ’ S SECOND CENTURY strength and stability, agility and flexibility – qualities that these abandoned buildings were steadily deteriorating have shepherded the Settlement’s transition from a 19th at the same time that land speculators were preparing century model into a 21st century institution. to acquire them for future re-development. But there were also powerful, committed, and cre- ative forces of renewal beginning to emerge. Commu- A Neighborhood and Settlement in Transition: nity activists were reclaiming the streets and parks from 1986-1996, A Period of Rebuilding and Reaffirmation the dealers and vagrants; housing activists were working to renovate and repair old buildings or planning for con- struction of new subsidized and supportive housing; and The Lower East Side has been a place of continuous social activists were fighting for the preservation and ex- change since it first became a home to new immigrants pansion of vital social service, educational and cultural arriving in the United States in the 19th century. In 1986, programs critical to a healthy community. University Settlement had served the community through University Settlement and its families directly felt and 100 years of shifting demographics, changing cultures, witnessed the negative forces affecting the community, and the continuous presence of challenging social but also understood the necessity of building upon the needs. The first decade of our second century was to be underlying strengths of the community. Our collective a critical time of transition for both the Settlement and response was to aggressively pursue a renewed vision the community. of the Settlement and an expanded engagement with A variety of social issues were having a strong impact local residents. The period from 1986 -1996 became the on community residents and on the institutions working decade of rebuilding and reaffirmation of the Settle- with the community. Criminal activities and drug use ment’s role and the Settlement tradition. were spreading major negative effects across the city, Fighting to protect quality of life and strengthening and certainly on the Lower East Side. Many of our street the community were top priorities. Two illustrative exam- corners and parks served as meeting points for drug ples best describe this strategy. Project Home was es- dealers and prostitutes. Teenage gangs, representing all tablished in 1986, designed to provide support services the local nationalities, were actively fighting each other to families moving from homelessness into new housing and intimidating local residents. Bricked up abandoned provided either by the New York City Housing Author- buildings, including a few on Eldridge Street, were home ity (NYCHA) or non-profit providers. Project Home staff to dealers selling their merchandise through holes in the worked in collaboration with these housing develop- cinder-block facades. And perhaps most troublesome, ers, efficiently providing diverse social service expertise 6 7 UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT ’ S SECOND CENTURY UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT ’ S SECOND CENTURY and enabling developers to do what they do best, i.e. who needed help, and working with the police to un- build new or renovate old units for use by lower income cover and challenge crime. In some cases, our staff were individuals and families. Utilizing Project Home as the threatened or even harmed, but ultimately we were common service provider enabled developers to avoid successful. Our pre-school continued to use the park creating redundant and inefficient service operations throughout this difficult period, an important demonstra- with each new building. Our staff helped fill and stabilize tion of our commitment. This important work reinforced NYCHA developments — including one right here on El- the Settlement’s historic connection to the City’s open dridge Street that the Settlement had been working on space movement and the work of Charles Stover, an for almost twenty years — as well as more than a dozen early Settlement leader, at the turn of the 20th century. projects across the community. In addition, Project Home Roosevelt Park has since been beautifully redesigned continued the Settlement’s historic tradition of advoca- from end to end, and has become a dynamic and vital cy and empowerment, bringing the community togeth- focal point for the incredibly diverse populations living er to fight for the rights of immigrants and low-income around it. tenants, and providing them with the tools they needed Rebuilding University Settlement’s historic home at to continue advocating for themselves. 184 Eldridge Street became another important priority. Project Home is still flourishing, now focusing on issues Placed on the National Register in 1986, but in need of such as preventing tenant evictions (caused, in part, substantial work if it was to continue serving the com- by gentrification or intense land speculation), protect- munity, this incredible building deserved our loyalty and ing immigrants’ rights, mitigating the effects of domestic attention. Many people recommended selling the prop- violence, securing access for individuals and families to erty and moving to a smaller more modern site – but the public benefits, providing assistance in finding employ- decision was made to do what was necessary to pre- ment opportunities, and other needs as they arise.
Recommended publications
  • The Settlement Movement in New York City, 1886-1914
    4\9b iN!o \\f1 \q~o THE SETTLEMENT HOUSE MOVEMENT IN NEW YORK CITY, 1886-1914 . HARRY P. KRAUS ARNO PRESS A New York Times Company New York • 1980 Editorial Supervision: St,eve Bedney F'ust publication in book form 1980 by Arno Press Inc. Copyright © 1980 by Harry P. Kraus Reproduced by pennission of Harry P. Kraus AMERICAN ETHNIC GROUPS: THE EUROPEAN HERITAGE ISBN for complete set: 0·405-15400-2 See last pages of this volume for titles Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Kraus, Harry P The settlement house movement in New York City, 1886-1914. (American ehhnic groups) Originally presented as the author I s thesis, New York university, 1970. 13ibllogra:PhY: p. i. Social settlements--New York (CitY)--Hist91'Y~ I. Title. II. Series. HV4196 .N6K7 1980 3te.5 '57'097471 80-872 lEEN 0-405-13434-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE PREFACE .•.•..••.....•...•••.........•. iii I. BACKGROUND ••••••••.••••••.••••.••••••·• 1 Definition Origins in ~ngland Development in the United Btates Settlement philoeophy II. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SETTLEMENT HOUSE IN NEW YORK CITy......................... 46 Pathfinders Pioneer settlement houses Development in New York ~ity III. PRACTICAL IDEALISTS................... 130 Types of settlement workers Background Motivation IV. THE SETTLEMENT AND THE COMMUNITy...... 152 Settlement programs Settlement influence Settlements and the Immigrant Settlements and the Negro V. SETTLEMENTS IN TRANSITION ••••••••• ;" •• 221 Factors: population movement, public agencies, new criteria f~r settlement personnel, institutionalism VI. THE SETTLEMENT EXPERIENCE............. 235 The slum dweller The settlement resident The community at large BIBLIOGRAPHY•••••••••••••••'••••••••••• 254- -v- and the Manuscript Division of the New York Public Library for their cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Americanization and Cultural Preservation in Seattle's Settlement House: a Jewish Adaptation of the Anglo-American Model of Settlement Work
    The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare Volume 26 Issue 3 September Article 3 September 1999 Americanization and Cultural Preservation in Seattle's Settlement House: A Jewish Adaptation of the Anglo-American Model of Settlement Work Alissa Schwartz Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw Part of the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation Schwartz, Alissa (1999) "Americanization and Cultural Preservation in Seattle's Settlement House: A Jewish Adaptation of the Anglo-American Model of Settlement Work," The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare: Vol. 26 : Iss. 3 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol26/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you by the Western Michigan University School of Social Work. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Americanization and Cultural Preservation in Seattle's Settlement House: A Jewish Adaptation of the Anglo-American Model of Settlement Work ALISSA SCHWARTZ New York City This articleexamines the dual agendas of Americanization and preserva- tion of Ashkenazic Jewish culture through an historicalanalysis of the work of Seattle's Settlement House, a social service center founded in 1906 by elite, Americanized Jews to serve poorer, immigrant Jews of Ashkenazic and Sephardic origin. Such analysis is set against the ideologicalbackdrop of Anglo-Americanism which pervaded the field of social work in its early efforts at self-definition and professionalization.Particular attention is paid to the role of the arts at Settlement House, with comparisons to Chicago's Hull-House, the prototypical American settlement operating at the turn of the century. This case study analyzes a German Jewish adaptationof an Anglo-American, Christian model of social work.
    [Show full text]
  • West Bank Settlement Homes and Real Estate Occupation
    Neoliberal Settlement as Violent State Project: West Bank Settlement Homes and Real Estate Occupation Yael Allweil Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning, Technion and Israel Institute for Advanced Studies [email protected] Abstract Intense ideological debates over the legal status of West Bank settlements and political campaigns objecting to or demanding their removal largely neglect the underlying capitalist processes that construct these settlements. Building upon the rich scholarship on the interrelations of militarism and capitalism, this study explores the relationship between capitalist and militarist occupation through housing development. Pointing to neoliberalism as central to the ways in which militarism and capitalism have played out in Israeli settlement dynamics since 1967, this paper unpacks the mutual dependency of the Israeli settlement project on real estate capitalism and neoliberal governance. Through historical study of the planning, financing, construction, and architecture of settlement dwellings as real estate, as well as interviews and analysis of settler-produced historiographies, this paper identifies the Occupied Territories (OT) as Israel’s testing ground for neoliberal governance and political economy. It presents a complementary historiography for the settlement project, identifying three distinct periods of settlement as the product of housing real estate: neoliberal experimentation (1967-1994), housing militarization (1994-2005), and “real-estate-ization” (2005-present). Drawing on Maron and Shalev
    [Show full text]
  • LOWLINE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Karp Strategies with Replace Urban Studio Executive Summary
    LOWLINE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Karp Strategies with rePlace Urban Studio Executive Summary The Lowline is a plan to build a green public space in an abandoned underground trolley terminal in the Lower East Side. Innovative solar technology will bring sunlight below ground into this one acre site. The Lowline collaborated with a consultant team to conduct focused community engagement of Lower East Side residents, businesses, and organizations from October 2016 through June 2017. This team held over 15 outreach events, including large public workshops, small focus groups, and youth training sessions, and deployed a digital platform to collect feedback from those who could not attend in person. At the conclusion of this phase of outreach, over 108,860 people directly engaged with the Lowline via these outreach activities and the Lowline lab. The primary findings that emerged from this work reveal that participants envision the future site as: a community-driven, inclusive, and free space; a space with many green and natural elements that can offer an oasis from the streets above; and a place for technological and environmental education, with a focus on youth empowerment. Participants also want to continue to have a say in the Lowline’s future development, programming, and operations. Lowline Community Engagement - July 2017 Karp Strategies | rePLACE Urban Studio 2 Lowline Community Engagement - July 2017 Karp Strategies | rePLACE Urban Studio 3 BACKGROUND • Project Background • Project Location • Community Snapshot • Engagement History • Community Input On Operations and Goverance This page left intentionally blank. Project Background The Lowline is an effort to build a lush, green public community space in an historic trolley terminal on the Lower East Side of New York City.
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony of State Senator Daniel Squadron Regarding the Draft Annual Plan 2013 for the New York City Housing Authority, July 25, 2012
    RANKING MEMBER INVESTIGATIONS AND GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS THE SENATE SOCIAL SERVICES DANIEL SQUADRON STATE OF NEW YORK COMMITTEES SENATOR, 25TH DISTRICT CODES CONSUMER PROTECTION CORPORATIONS, AUTHORITIES & COMMISSIONS FINANCE JUDICIARY TRANSPORTATION TESTIMONY OF STATE SENATOR DANIEL SQUADRON REGARDING THE DRAFT ANNUAL PLAN 2013 FOR THE NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, JULY 25, 2012. My name is Daniel Squadron and I represent the 25th Senate District in the New York State Senate. My district includes the Brooklyn neighborhoods of Greenpoint, Williamsburg, Vinegar Hill, Fulton Ferry, Brooklyn Heights, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens and Gowanus, and the Manhattan neighborhoods of Tribeca, Battery Park City, the Lower East Side, Chinatown, the Financial District, Little Italy, SoHo and the East Village. Thank you for the opportunity to testify at this hearing. Among the New Yorkers that I represent are the residents of 24 New York City Housing Authority Developments, spanning the Lower East Side, East Village, Willamsburg, and Chinatown. The Manhattan part of my district includes the Bernard Baruch Houses, Marianna Bracetti Houses, Pedro Albizu Campos, East 4th Street Rehab, First Houses, Samuel Gompers Houses, Rafael Hernandez Houses, Fiorello H. LaGuardia Houses, Lower East Side I, II, and III, Lower East Side Rehab, Max Meltzer Tower, Jacob Riis Houses, Henry Rutgers Houses, Seward Park Extension, Alfred E. Smith Houses, Two Bridges, Vladeck Houses, Lillian Wald Houses, and 45 Allen Street. In Brooklyn, I represent three developments: the Taylor Street-Wythe Avenue Houses, Williams Plaza, and Independence Towers. My constituents experience firsthand the challenges described by the New York City Alliance to Preserve Public Housing, and that is why I generally support the recommendations listed in the Alliance’s NYCHA FY 2013 Draft Annual Plan Position Statement.
    [Show full text]
  • GUIDE to Applying for Public HOUSING REVISED December 2012
    GUIDE TO APPLYING FOR PUBLIC HOUSING REVISED DECEMBER 2012 A. The New York City Housing Authority operates 334 developments in all five boroughs. All of our developments are NEW YORK CITY listed in this booklet. If you wish to be considered for any of these HOUSING AUTHORITY developments, please fill out an “Application for Apartment” form. B. IMPORTANT: No payment or fee should be given to anyone in connection with the preparation, filing or processing of an application for Public Housing. C. YOU ARE PROBABLY ELIGIBLE FOR AN APARTMENT IF: y The income of your family does not exceed the limits shown on the following page. y You meet NYCHA’s definition of family. The term “family” as used by the New York City Housing Authority includes the following: a. Two or more persons related by blood, marriage, domestic partnership, adoption, guardianship or court awarded custody. b. A single person. y Your admission to a public housing development will not endanger the welfare and safety of other residents. y You and your co-head are at least 18 years of age (the co-head must be your spouse or partner). To be eligible for a senior building, you or your co-head must be at least 62 years of age. D. PROCESSING OF APPLICATIONS Further description of the eligibility requirements for admission and the Authority’s Tenant Selection and Assignment Plan are available on our website or at the Customer Contact Centers listed below: 1. Bronx/Manhattan 2. Queens 3. Brooklyn/Staten Island Customer Contact Center Customer Contact Center Customer Contact Center 478 East Fordham Road, 2nd Floor 90-27 Sutphin Blvd., 4th Floor 787 Atlantic Avenue, 2nd Floor Bronx, NY 10458 Jamaica, NY 11435 Brooklyn, NY 11238 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Settlement House Tradition: Current Trends and Future Concerns
    The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare Volume 30 Issue 2 June Article 4 June 2003 The Settlement House Tradition: Current Trends and Future Concerns Beverly Koerin Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw Part of the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation Koerin, Beverly (2003) "The Settlement House Tradition: Current Trends and Future Concerns," The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare: Vol. 30 : Iss. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol30/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you by the Western Michigan University School of Social Work. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Settlement House Tradition: Current Trends and Future Concerns BEVERLY KOERIN, MSW, PHD Virginia Commonwealth University School of Social Work The settlement tradition represents a comprehensive approach that "strengthens individual and neighborhood assets, and builds collective capacity to address community problems" (Hirota, Brown, & Martin, 1996, p. i). While there is a rich literature on the history of the settle- ment movement, there is little information about contemporarysettlement houses. This paper reports findings of a national survey of settlement houses/neighborhoodcenters that provide informationabout programsand services offered, populations served, unmet community needs, and policies or trends that contribute to or respond to these needs. In recent years, there have been calls within the social work profession for a return to our settlement house roots (e.g., Husock, 1993; Jacobson, 2001; Lundblad, 1995). In contrast to an individ- ualized and deficit-oriented approach, the settlement tradition represents a comprehensive approach that "strengthens individ- ual and neighborhood assets, and builds collective capacity to address community problems" (Hirota, Brown, & Martin, 1996, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Rockislandpreservationcommiss
    RRoocckk IIssllaanndd PPrreesseerrvvaattiioonn CCoommmmiissssiioonn Meeting Date: WWeeddnneessddaayy,, AApprriill 2277,, 22001111 Meeting Begins 5:15 p.m. Council Chamber Third Floor, Rock Island City Hall, 1528 3rd Avenue, Rock Island MEETING AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Welcome New Members Craig Kavensky and Italo Milani 4. Approval of the Minutes of the March 23, 2011 Regular Meeting 5. Approval of the Minutes of the March 31, 2011 Preliminary Determination Subcommittee Meeting 6. Public Hearing #2011-6 – Consideration of a Nomination for Landmark Designation for 427 7th Avenue, which is also known as the West End Settlement 7. Comment on Section 106 Review for 1900 3rd Avenue 8. Comment on Section 106 Review for 3000 24th Street 9. Update on CDBG Funding Match for 2011 CLG Grant 10. Centennial Bridge Visitor Center Saturday Volunteers for May-July 2011 11. Other Business 12. Adjournment Attachment West End Settlement Landmark Nomination Rock Island, Illinois > 309.732.2900 > www.rigov.org UNAPPROVED MINUTES OF THE ROCK ISLAND PRESERVATION COMMISSION Regular Meeting 4:00 p.m. March 23, 2011 Location: Personnel Conference Room, Rock Island City Hall, 1528 3rd Avenue, Rock Island, IL Attendance: ( X ) Present ( ) Absent ( ) Steve Andich ( X ) John Strieter ( X ) Bob Braun ( X ) Stephen Warren ( X ) Lendol Calder ( X ) Linda Anderson (Assoc.) ( X ) David Cordes ( ) Jeff Dismer (Assoc.) ( X ) Kent Cornish ( X ) Daryl Empen (Assoc.) ( X ) Jane Koski ( X ) Diane Oestreich (Assoc.) ( X ) Mark McVey Staff Present: Alan Carmen, Jill Doak, Ellen Adams Others Present: Paul Fessler, Brian Hollenback, Ben Reeder, Steven Schrock Note: Case numbers listed on the agenda packet were out of order; the case numbers in the minutes are correct.
    [Show full text]
  • The Slave Galleries Restoration Project Case Study: St. Augustine's
    The Slave Galleries Restoration Project Case Study: St. Augustine’s Episcopal Church and the Lower East Side Tenement Museum PREFACE BY ANIMATING DEMOCRACY The Slave Galleries Restoration Project points to the power of history—and particularly the historic site—as a catalyst for exploring contemporary issues. The ethnically diverse neighorhood of the Lower East Side of Manhattan has been created by the shifts and tensions of generations of immigrants living alongside American-born racial minorities. Oppression, domination of others, and efforts toward self-determination have alternated over time, as various groups have been used and exploited by other groups—some gaining a central role in the neighborhood, with THE SLAVE GALLERIES RESTORATION PROJECT CASE STUDY others remaining at the margins. Conflicts today on the Lower East Side continue over material resources like housing and schools as well as how groups are represented in the neighborhood’s history. The Slave Galleries Project was a collaboration between St. Augustine’s Episcopal Church and the Lower East Side Tenement Museum to restore and interpret the two slave galleries located in the church, cramped rooms where African American congregants were segregated during the nineteenth century. The project brought together community preservationists—leaders representing African American, Asian, Latino, Jewish, and other ethnic and religious groups— with scholars and preservationists to help restore and interpret the slave galleries as a catalyst for dialogue within the community. Over a year’s time, guided by two dialogue professionals experienced in intergroup relations, community preservationists talked first among themselves about issues of marginalization on the Lower East Side. They explored the meaning and use of the slave galleries, a powerful artifact of the history of segregation, as a space for dialogue for the larger Lower East Side community.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Garden Communities
    Creating Garden Communities A NEW SET OF PRINCIPLES FOR MODERN TIMES Foreword In response to the Government’s announcement at At Stantec, we have significant experience of working the start of 2017 to use garden cities and towns as a on such developments including Kilnwood Vale in way of supporting much-needed housing delivery Crawley, Aylesbury Woodlands and, perhaps most across 14 key regions in the UK, Stantec launched a notably, Ebbsfleet where we have been involved for series of blogs to review the original principles of the over 25 years. We pride ourselves on creating garden city movement and discuss how these should communities where people want to live and, as garden be updated to be relevant to modern times. settlements offer a unique opportunity to do this, the questions and issues surrounding them are close to Whilst the Government has been supporting garden Stantec’s heart. settlements as one answer to the housing crisis, we wanted to investigate what is a ‘garden settlement’? We hope this collection of pieces will contribute to a How does it differ from the original vision of a garden better understanding of how garden style communities city, and what does this tell us about how to deliver can provide sustainable places where people want to better new communities? Each blog looked at a live, work and play — as well as contribute to meeting different key principle in making garden cities relevant future housing needs. to modern times including the benefits they offer and the challenges that stand in the way of their delivery.
    [Show full text]
  • Embracing Gendered Space: How Women Manipulated the Settlement Home to Engage
    Embracing Gendered Space: How Women Manipulated the Settlement Home to Engage in Progressive-Era Politics A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Beca R. Schumann April 2021 © 2021 Beca Renee Schumann. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled Embracing Gendered Space: How Women Manipulated the Settlement Home to Engage in Progressive-Era Politics by BECA R. SCHUMANN has been approved for the Political Science Department and the College of Arts and Sciences by Judith Grant Professor of Political Science Florenz Plassmann Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 Abstract BECA R. SCHUMANN, M.A., April 2021, Political Science Embracing Gendered Space: How Women Manipulated the Settlement Home to Engage in Progressive-Era Politics Director of Thesis: Judith Grant This research aims to insert the theory of gendered space into the narrative history of the American settlement movement by analyzing how settlement residents manipulated private spaces to engage in Progressive-Era politics. Hull House, the first settlement home, is used as a case study to demonstrate how female settlement residents utilized the settlement home as a hybrid public-private space to legitimize their social reform activities in urban areas. By embracing gendered spaces and cultural feminist beliefs about the natural role of women, settlement residents were able to effectively bargain for a more active role and voice in political life. Despite the social and political gains female settlement residents were able to achieve, their approach has been widely criticized by feminist scholars, since the embracing of gendered spaces and essentialist female traits continues to inhibit women from breaking free from structural forms of patriarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • New York County
    Line 112-CI-21 JUNE PRIMARY ELECTION – 2021 (SUBJECT TO CHANGE) POLL SITE LIST NEW YORK COUNTY 65th Assembly District 66th Assembly District 67th Assembly District 68th Assembly District 69th Assembly District 70th Assembly District ED SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS ED SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS ED SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS ED SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS ED SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS ED SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS 001 UASBYW ................................................ 81 NEW STREET 001 PS 89...............................................201 WARREN STREET 001 RIVER PLACE 1 ............................... 650 WEST 42 STREET 001 STANLEY ISAACS CENTER............. 415 EAST 93 STREET 001 FRANK MCCOURT HS ..................... 151 WEST 84 STREET 001 PS 185/PS 208 .................................. 20 WEST 111 STREET 002 UASBYW ................................................ 81 NEW STREET 002 PS 89...............................................201 WARREN STREET 002 ELIAS HOWE PRIMARY SCHL 51 MANHATTAN ...525 W 44 ST 002 STANLEY ISAACS CENTER............. 415 EAST 93 STREET 002 FRANK MCCOURT HS ..................... 151 WEST 84 STREET 002 CHARLES HILL TOWER ........................... 2050 8 AVENUE 003 ST MARGARET’S HOUSE ................. 49 FULTON STREET 003 PS 234 (INDEPENDENCE) ........292 GREENWICH STREET 003 RIVER PLACE 1 ............................... 650 WEST 42 STREET 003 SCHOOL OF CO-OP EDUCATION .... 321 EAST 96 STREET 003 FRANK MCCOURT HS ..................... 151 WEST 84 STREET 003 CHARLES HILL TOWER ........................... 2050 8 AVENUE 004 UASBYW
    [Show full text]