DOCSLIB.ORG

San Jose State University San Jose, CA 95192-0115

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
San Jose State University San Jose, CA 95192-0115 DRAFT July 14, 2008 Natural Regeneration of Three Oak Species at the Enid W. Pearson-Arastradero Preserve in Santa Clara County, California A Report By: Dr. Lynne Trulio and the Advanced Environmental Restoration Class Department of Environmental Studies San Jose State University San Jose, CA 95192-0115 July 2008 DRAFT July 14, 2008 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY …………………………………………………………………… . 6 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................... 10 VALLEY OAKS (Quercus lobata)............................................................................................. 12 Range and Physical Appearance............................................................................................... 12 Physical Conditions .................................................................................................................. 15 Growth Habits........................................................................................................................... 15 Interactions with Other Important Species ............................................................................... 16 Factors in Regeneration ............................................................................................................ 17 BLUE OAK (Quercus douglasii)................................................................................................ 19 Range and Physical Appearance............................................................................................... 19 Growth and Physical Conditions .............................................................................................. 21 Population ................................................................................................................................. 22 Interactions with Other Important Species ............................................................................... 23 Factors in Regeneration ............................................................................................................ 23 COAST LIVE OAK (Quercus agrifolia)................................................................................... 26 Range and Physical Appearance............................................................................................... 26 Interactions with Other Important Species ............................................................................... 29 Factors in Regeneration ............................................................................................................ 30 ARASTRADERO PRESERVE HISTORY.............................................................................. 33 Early History to Pre-1970 ......................................................................................................... 33 History from 1970 to 1990........................................................................................................ 36 History from 1990 to present ....................................................................................................38 STUDY SETTING and SAMPLING DESIGN........................................................................ 43 Setting ....................................................................................................................................... 44 Stand Selection.......................................................................................................................... 45 Sampling Design....................................................................................................................... 49 DATA COLLECTION ............................................................................................................... 40 Plot Data.................................................................................................................................... 51 DRAFT July 14, 2008 Sapling Data.............................................................................................................................. 53 Adult Data................................................................................................................................. 53 Data Preparation........................................................................................................................ 54 DATA ANALYSIS...................................................................................................................... 55 GIS Mapping............................................................................................................................. 55 Statistics .................................................................................................................................... 55 RESULTS .................................................................................................................................... 56 DISCUSSION .............................................................................................................................. 60 Characteristics of Saplings........................................................................................................ 63 Factors Affecting Seedling Location ........................................................................................ 65 Climate Considerations............................................................................................................. 67 RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................ 68 General...................................................................................................................................... 68 Planting ..................................................................................................................................... 71 Monitoring ................................................................................................................................ 73 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................ 79 Appendix 1: Protocols for Field Data Collection ………………………………………...…..88 Appendix 2: Field Data Sheets…………………………………………………………………90 Appendix 3: Protocols for Data Entry ………………………….. ........................................... 94 Appendix 4: Total Number of Saplings and By Species for Each Stand Sampled……… ... 95 Appendix 5: UTMs for Plots Sampled………………………………………………………105 DRAFT July 14, 2008 Figures Figure 1: Range of Valley Oaks in California .............................................................................. 13 Figure 2: Lobed leaves of Valley Oak .......................................................................................... 14 Figure 3: Bark of Valley Oak........................................................................................................ 14 Figure 4: Valley Oak Acorns ........................................................................................................ 19 Figure 5: Distribution of Blue Oaks.............................................................................................. 20 Figure 6: Blue Oak Bark ..................................................................................................... 21 Figure 7: Blue Oak Leaves .......................................................................................................... 21 Figure 8: Coast Live Oak leaves................................................................................................... 27 Figure 9: Coast live oak acorns..................................................................................................... 27 Figure 10: Drawing of an Original J.H. Cutter Whiskey bottle.................................................... 34 Figure 11: Depiction of Camp Fremont during its operation. ...................................................... 35 Figure 12: Boundary and Trail Map of Arastradero Preserve ...................................................... 37 Figure 13: Distribution of Tree Species at Arastradero Preserve. ................................................ 46 Figure 14: Locations of Juvenile Oaks Planted at Arastradero Preserve in 2007......................... 47 Figure 15: Locations of Mowed Regions at Arastradero Preserve............................................... 48 Figure 16: Location of Stands Chosen for Sampling.................................................................... 50 Figure 17: Stratified Classification used for Each Stand.............................................................. 51 Figure 18: Sampling Plot Design.................................................................................................. 52 Figure 19: Spherical Densiometer ................................................................................................52 Figure 20: Clinometer................................................................................................................... 54 Figure 21: How to Measure the Height of a Tree on a Flat Surface............................................. 54 Figure 22: Sapling Distribution in all Strata................................................................................. 57 Figure 23: Sapling Distribution in Tree Strata.............................................................................. 57 Figure 24: Sapling Distribution in Adjacent Strata......................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historical Mortality of Valley Oak (Quercus Lobata, Nee) in the Santa Ynez Valley, Santa Barbara County, 1938-19891
    Historical Mortality of Valley Oak (Quercus lobata, Nee) in the Santa Ynez Valley, Santa Barbara County, 1938-19891 Rodney W. Brown Frank W. Davis2 Abstract: The range and abundance of valley oak (Quercus thus represents, at least for the present, a thinning process lobata, Née) have steadily decreased in the last 100 years due to ultimately resulting in a treeless grassland. low rates of regeneration during this period. Documented low Scheidlinger and Zedler (1980) used aerial coverage from rates of sapling recruitment must be compared to adult mortality 1928 and 1970 to measure change in canopy cover of coast live rates in order to evaluate the severity of this decline. The purpose oak stands in southern San Diego County. We have analyzed of this research is to measure and analyze the mortality rate of historical aerial photography to measure the mortality rates of established valley oaks in different habitat types over the past 51 valley oaks in different habitat types over the past 51 years and years. Valley oak stands of the Santa Ynez Valley in Santa to investigate how mortality varies among sites, habitats, and Barbara County were mapped and stratified into three major time periods. habitat types: valley floor alluvium, lower hillslopes and swales, and rolling uplands. Mortality rates of canopy individuals in each habitat type were determined for a sample of 600 valley oaks censused in 1938 aerial photography and re-censused in 1954,1967,1978, and 1989.125 of 600 (20.8 percent) sampled METHODS individuals disappeared during the 51 year period. No new individuals were recruited into the canopy layer during this time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oak Woodland Bird Conservation Plan: a Strategy for Protecting and Managing Oak Woodland Habitats and Associated Birds in California1
    The Oak Woodland Bird Conservation Plan: A Strategy for Protecting and Managing Oak Woodland Habitats and Associated Birds in California1 Steve Zack,2 Mary K. Chase,3 Geoffrey R. Geupel,3 and Diana Stralberg3 ________________________________________ Introduction Over 330 species of birds, mammals, reptiles, and protected status. Lack of recruitment of young oaks amphibians depend on oak woodlands in California combined with the SOD epidemic affect seven of the (fig. 1) at some stage in their life cycle (Barrett 1980; ten acorn-bearing species of oak trees in California Verner 1980; Block and Morrison 1998). These wood- (table 1). The combined effect of these two problems lands are able to sustain such abundant wildlife pri- on native wildlife populations is inestimable. marily because they produce acorns, a high quality and frequently copious food supply. The birds of Cali- The Oak Woodland Bird Conservation Plan (BCP) fornia’s oak woodlands are connected to this distinctive (Zack et al., 2002; see also http://www.prbo.org/calpif habitat mainly through acorns, the fruits of oaks that /plans.html and printed copies (albeit without species’ are eaten and stored by dozens of species. This ecologi- accounts) are available from PRBO) has been devel- cal relationship is also reciprocal: species like Western oped by California Partners in Flight to guide conser- Scrub-Jays (Aphelocoma californica), Steller’s Jays vation policy and action on behalf of oak woodland (Cyanocita stelleri), and Yellow-billed Magpies (Pica habitats and wildlife, with the goal of supporting the nuttalli) do not completely retrieve cached acorns and long-term viability and recovery of both native bird thus act as dispersers of oak seedlings across the land- populations and other native species.
    [Show full text]
  • El Dorado County Oak Woodland Management Plan
    El Dorado County Oak Woodland Management Plan April 2008 Planning Commission Recommended Version El Dorado County Development Services Department – Planning Services 2850 Fairlane Court, Placerville, CA 95667 OAK WOODLAND MANAGEMENT PLAN Table of Contents 1. Introduction.....................................................................................................................1 A. Purpose ....................................................................................................................1 B. Goals and Objectives of Plan...................................................................................2 C. Oak Woodland Habitat in El Dorado County..........................................................3 D. Economic Activity, Land, and Ecosystem Values of Oak Woodlands ...................4 E. California Oak Woodlands Conservation Act .........................................................4 2. Policy 7.4.4.4.................................................................................................................5 A. Applicability and Exemptions.................................................................................5 B. Replacement Objectives ..........................................................................................7 C. Mitigation Option A ................................................................................................7 D. On-Site Mitigation...................................................................................................8 E. Mitigation Option B.................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Determining Significance and Report Format and Content Requirements
    COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING SIGNIFICANCE AND REPORT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENT GROUP Department of Planning and Land Use Department of Public Works Fourth Revision September 15, 2010 APPROVAL I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources, Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources, and Report Format and Content Requirements for Resource Management Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group's Guidelines for Determining Significance and Technical Report Format and Content Requirements and were considered by the Director of Planning and Land Use, in coordination with the Director of Public Works on September 15, 2O1O. ERIC GIBSON Director of Planning and Land Use SNYDER I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources, Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources, and Report Format and Content Requirements for Resource Management Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group's Guidelines for Determining Significance and Technical Report Format and Content Requirements and have hereby been approved by the Deputy Chief Administrative Officer (DCAO) of the Land Use and Environment Group on the fifteenth day of September, 2010. The Director of Planning and Land Use is authorized to approve revisions to these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources and Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources and Resource Management Plans except any revisions to the Guidelines for Determining Significance presented in Section 4.0 must be approved by the Deputy CAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Quercus ×Coutinhoi Samp. Discovered in Australia Charlie Buttigieg
    XXX International Oaks The Journal of the International Oak Society …the hybrid oak that time forgot, oak-rod baskets, pros and cons of grafting… Issue No. 25/ 2014 / ISSN 1941-2061 1 International Oaks The Journal of the International Oak Society … the hybrid oak that time forgot, oak-rod baskets, pros and cons of grafting… Issue No. 25/ 2014 / ISSN 1941-2061 International Oak Society Officers and Board of Directors 2012-2015 Officers President Béatrice Chassé (France) Vice-President Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven (Belgium) Secretary Gert Fortgens (The Netherlands) Treasurer James E. Hitz (USA) Board of Directors Editorial Committee Membership Director Chairman Emily Griswold (USA) Béatrice Chassé Tour Director Members Shaun Haddock (France) Roderick Cameron International Oaks Allen Coombes Editor Béatrice Chassé Shaun Haddock Co-Editor Allen Coombes (Mexico) Eike Jablonski (Luxemburg) Oak News & Notes Ryan Russell Editor Ryan Russell (USA) Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven International Editor Roderick Cameron (Uruguay) Website Administrator Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven For contributions to International Oaks contact Béatrice Chassé [email protected] or [email protected] 0033553621353 Les Pouyouleix 24800 St.-Jory-de-Chalais France Author’s guidelines for submissions can be found at http://www.internationaloaksociety.org/content/author-guidelines-journal-ios © 2014 International Oak Society Text, figures, and photographs © of individual authors and photographers. Graphic design: Marie-Paule Thuaud / www.lecentrecreatifducoin.com Photos. Cover: Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven (Quercus macrocalyx Hickel & A. Camus); p. 6: Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven (Q. oxyodon Miq.); p. 7: Béatrice Chassé (Q. acerifolia (E.J. Palmer) Stoynoff & W. J. Hess); p. 9: Eike Jablonski (Q. ithaburensis subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Quercus Lobata Née) at Two California Sites1
    Establishing a Range-Wide Provenance Test in Valley Oak (Quercus lobata Née) at 1 Two California Sites 2 3 4 Annette Delfino Mix, Jessica W. Wright, Paul F. Gugger, 5 6 Christina Liang, and Victoria L. Sork Abstract We present the methods used to establish a provenance test in valley oak, Quercus lobata. Nearly 11,000 acorns were planted and 88 percent of those germinated. The resulting seedlings were measured after 1 and 2 years of growth, and were outplanted in the field in the winter of 2014-2015. This test represents a long-term resource for both research and conservation. Key words: Provenance tests, Quercus lobata, valley oak Introduction We set out to establish a long-term provenance test of valley oak (Quercus lobata) collected from across the species range. Provenance tests are designed to compare survival and growth (plus other morphological and phenological traits) among trees sampled from different parts of the species range (Mátyás 1996). By having different sources grown in a common environment, we are able to look at how different sources perform in a novel climate, and how they might respond to climate change (Aitken and others 2008). This study has a multitude of goals, from very practical management questions on how to source seeds for ecological restoration projects involving oaks, to very detailed ecological genomic studies. Our collecting and plant propagating methods were developed with a standard quantitative genetic analysis in mind (with plans for genomic analyses as well in the future). Here we outline the methods used to establish a provenance test of Quercus lobata trees in California, and we present some very early results from the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Arboreal Seed Removal and Insect Damage in Three California Oaks1
    Arboreal Seed Removal and Insect Damage 1 in Three California Oaks Walter D. Koenig,2 Johannes M. H. Knops,3 and William J. Carmen4 Abstract We investigated arboreal removal and insect damage to acorns in an undisturbed oak woodland in central coastal California. Arboreal seed removal was determined for four to eight individual Quercus lobata trees over a period of 14 years by comparing visual estimates of the acorn crop with the number of acorns caught in seed traps. Insect damage was assessed by sampling acorns from trees of all three species of oaks common in the study site (Quercus lobata, Q. douglasii, and Q. agrifolia). Patterns were generally similar for both sets of data: more acorns, but a smaller proportion of the crop, were removed or damaged as the productivity of an individual tree increased. However, we found no evidence that trees outproducing local conspecifics attracted a disproportionate number of arboreal seed or insect predators. Acorn removal was not significantly correlated with population sizes of either California scrub-jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens) or acorn woodpeckers (Melanerpes formicivorus), two common arboreal seed removers that are also potentially important dispersal agents. These patterns are partially in accord with predator satiation, but not the attraction of seed dispersers, being an important factor potentially influencing the reproductive strategies of oaks in central coastal California. Introduction Patterns of seed production, including reproductive synchrony on a geographically large scale or
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Evaluation: Guidance for the Review of Environmental Impact Assessment Documents
    HABITAT EVALUATION: GUIDANCE FOR THE REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTS EPA Contract No. 68-C0-0070 work Assignments B-21, 1-12 January 1993 Submitted to: Jim Serfis U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Federal Activities 401 M Street, SW Washington, DC 20460 Submitted by: Mark Southerland Dynamac Corporation The Dynamac Building 2275 Research Boulevard Rockville, MD 20850 CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ... ...... .... ... ................................................. 1 Habitat Conservation .......................................... 2 Habitat Evaluation Methodology ................................... 2 Habitats of Concern ........................................... 3 Definition of Habitat ..................................... 4 General Habitat Types .................................... 5 Values and Services of Habitats ................................... 5 Species Values ......................................... 5 Biological diversity ...................................... 6 Ecosystem Services.. .................................... 7 Activities Impacting Habitats ..................................... 8 Land Conversion ....................................... 9 Land Conversion to Industrial and Residential Uses ............. 9 Land Conversion to Agricultural Uses ...................... 10 Land Conversion to Transportation Uses .................... 10 Timber Harvesting ...................................... 11 Grazing ............................................. 12 Mining .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Oak Woodland Resources in BLM's Eugene District
    Assessment of Oak Woodland Resources in BLM’s Eugene District Lane County, Oregon Technical Note 406 June 2000 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management December 1999 Assessment of Oak Woodland Resources in BLM’s Eugene District Lane County, Oregon Technical Note 406 By: David G. Chiller Research Biologist, Pacific Wildlife Research Inc. David G. Vesely Senior Forest Ecologist, Pacific Wildlife Research Inc. William I. Dean Wildlife Biologist, Bureau of Land Management, Eugene District Eugene District Office 2890 Chad Drive Eugene, OR 97440-2226 June 2000 BLM/OR/WA/PL-00/052+6635 ABSTRACTABSTRACT Because of the significant loss of oak (Quercus were delineated; and the topographic features, spp.) habitat and the subsequent increased value vegetation structure, and composition of the placed on oak woodlands for wildlife habitat, the sites were characterized. Current conditions preservation and restoration of native oak wood- were then compared with conditions docu- lands has become a priority for land man- mented in historical records. In addition, the agers and conservationists in the Western wildlife species most likely occurring on the United States. In 1998, reconnaissance sur- sites were identified. Literature from oak wood- veys were conducted on 13 oak woodland sites land studies was then reviewed to determine managed by the Bureau of Land Management’s whether certain management and restoration (BLM’s) Eugene District in Lane County, methods, such as eliminating conifer encroach- Oregon. The sites were classified as either ment and thinning closed-canopy stands, would meadow-type communities or woodland-type be effective in addressing conditions observed at communities; oak patches within the sites the BLM sites.
    [Show full text]
  • An Updated Infrageneric Classification of the North American Oaks
    Article An Updated Infrageneric Classification of the North American Oaks (Quercus Subgenus Quercus): Review of the Contribution of Phylogenomic Data to Biogeography and Species Diversity Paul S. Manos 1,* and Andrew L. Hipp 2 1 Department of Biology, Duke University, 330 Bio Sci Bldg, Durham, NC 27708, USA 2 The Morton Arboretum, Center for Tree Science, 4100 Illinois 53, Lisle, IL 60532, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The oak flora of North America north of Mexico is both phylogenetically diverse and species-rich, including 92 species placed in five sections of subgenus Quercus, the oak clade centered on the Americas. Despite phylogenetic and taxonomic progress on the genus over the past 45 years, classification of species at the subsectional level remains unchanged since the early treatments by WL Trelease, AA Camus, and CH Muller. In recent work, we used a RAD-seq based phylogeny including 250 species sampled from throughout the Americas and Eurasia to reconstruct the timing and biogeography of the North American oak radiation. This work demonstrates that the North American oak flora comprises mostly regional species radiations with limited phylogenetic affinities to Mexican clades, and two sister group connections to Eurasia. Using this framework, we describe the regional patterns of oak diversity within North America and formally classify 62 species into nine major North American subsections within sections Lobatae (the red oaks) and Quercus (the Citation: Manos, P.S.; Hipp, A.L. An Quercus Updated Infrageneric Classification white oaks), the two largest sections of subgenus . We also distill emerging evolutionary and of the North American Oaks (Quercus biogeographic patterns based on the impact of phylogenomic data on the systematics of multiple Subgenus Quercus): Review of the species complexes and instances of hybridization.
    [Show full text]
  • Monterey County Voluntary Oak Woodland Stewardship Guidelines
    Monterey County Voluntary Oak Woodland Stewardship Guidelines Monterey County September 2009 Monterey County Voluntary Oak Woodland Stewardship Guidelines Monterey County Voluntary Oak Woodland Stewardship Guidelines Adopted by the Board of Supervisors September 22, 2009 (Resolution No. 09-389) Fernando Armenta, District 1 Louis R. Calcagno, District 2 Simon Salinas, District 3 Jane Parker, District 4 Dave Potter, District 5 Prepared by: Monterey County Planning Department Paula Bradley, MCP, AICP, Associate Planner Technical Information Obtained From: Dr. Mark Stromberg, Director, Hastings Natural History Reserve (University of California) i September 2009 Monterey County Voluntary Oak Woodland Stewardship Guidelines Table of Contents Page Executive Summary 1 Section 1: Conservation Opportunity 4 Section 2: Status of Oak Woodlands in Monterey County 5 2.1 Oak Species in Monterey County 5 2.2 Oak Woodlands in Monterey County 6 2.3 Threats to Oak Woodlands 9 Section 3: Values of Oak Woodlands to Community 10 3.1 Livestock Grazing 10 3.2 Real Estate and Scenery 10 Section 4: Oak Woodland Natural Resource Values 11 4.1 Wildlife Habitat and Species Diversity 11 4.2 Carbon Sequestration 12 4.3 Additional Resource Values 12 Section 5: Impacts of Oak Woodland Loss 13 Section 6: Participation in the California Oak Woodland Conservation Program 13 6.1 Criteria for Projects in Monterey County 14 6.2 Voluntary Program 16 Section 7: Education and Outreach for Oak Woodland Conservation 16 Section 8: Oak Woodland Stewardship Guidelines Update 18 Conclusion 18 Exhibit A: References and Resources for Additional Reading 19 Exhibit B: Oak Woodland Conservation Program Application Process 25 ii September 2009 Monterey County Voluntary Oak Woodland Stewardship Guidelines Executive Summary This document is designed to promote the voluntary long-term conservation of Monterey County’s oak woodlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Uses, Management, and Restoration of Oaks of the Far Western United States
    United States Technical Note No. 2 Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service National Plant Data Center Indigenous Uses, Management, September 2007 and Restoration of Oaks of the Far Western United States Issued September 2007 Cover photo: Shelled acorns from the California black oak (Quercus kel­ loggii) (Courtesy of Kat Anderson, NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, re­ prisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should con­ tact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call (800) 795–3272 (voice) or (202) 720–6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Acknowledgments This publication was authored by M. Kat Anderson, ethnoecologist, National Plant Center, Davis, California, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), and reviewed by Scott Peterson, director, National Plant Data Center, NRCS; Michael Johnson, anthropologist, NRCS; Reina Rogers, American Indian liaison, NRCS; Pat Shaver, rangeland management specialist, NRCS; Pedro Tor­ res, tribal liaison, NRCS; and Sarah Bridges, national cultural resources specialist, NRCS.
    [Show full text]