Initial Environmental Examination IND: Madhya Pradesh District

Home , Anuppur district, Nai Garhi, Satna district, Singrauli district

Initial Environmental Examination

December 2016

IND: Madhya Pradesh District Roads II Sector Project

(12 Subproject Road Sections-Package 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,10,11,14,15,16,17,18,19,20)

Prepared by Government of Madhya Pradesh (Madhya Pradesh Roads Development Corporation) for the Asian Development Bank.

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (As of 31 December 2016) Currency unit – Indian Rupee (Rs) INR 1.00 = $ 0.01509 $ 1.00 = 66.2490

ABBREVIATION

AADT - Annual Average Daily Traffic AAQM - Ambient air quality monitoring ADB - Asian Development Bank ASI - Archaeological Survey of India BDL -- Below detectable limit BGL - Below ground level BOD - Biochemical oxygen demand BOQ - Bill of quantity CGWA - Central Ground Water Authority CO - Carbon monoxide COD - Chemical oxygen demand CPCB -- Central Pollution Control Board CSC - Construction Supervision Consultant DFO - Divisional Forest Officer DG - Diesel generating set DO - Dissolved oxygen DPR - Detailed project report E&S - Environment and social EA - Executing agency EAC - Expert Appraisal Committee EFP - Environmental Focal Person EHS - Environment Health and Safety EIA - Environmental impact assessment EMOP - Environmental monitoring plan EMP - Environmental management plan ESCAP - United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and Pacific GHG - Greenhouse gas GIS - Geographical information system GOI - Government of India GRC - Grievance redress committee GRM - Grievance redress mechanism HFL - Highest flood level IA - Implementing Agency IEE - Initial Environmental Examination IMD - Indian Meteorological Department IRC - Indian Road Congress IUCN - International Union for Conservation of Nature LHS - Left hand side LPG - Liquefied petroleum gas MOEFCC - Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change MORSTH/ - Ministry of Road Surface Transport and Highways MORTH MPRSD - Master Plan Road Sector Development N, S, E, W, - Wind Directions (North, South, East, West or NE, SW, combination of Two directions like South West, North NW West) NGO - Non-governmental organization NH - National Highway NOC - No Objection Certificate NOx - Oxides of nitrogen PAH - Project Affected Household PAP - Project Affected Persons PAs - Protected Areas PCR - Public Community Resources PCU - Passenger Car Units PD - Project Director PM - Particulate Matter PIU - Project Implementation Unit PPE - Personal protective equipment PPT - Parts per trillion PPTA - Project Preparedness Technical Assistance PUC - Pollution Under Control PWD - Public Works Department R & R - Rehabilitation and Resettlement RHS - Right hand side ROB - Road Over Bridge ROW - Right of way RSPM - Respiratory suspended particulate matter SAARC - South Asian Association for Regional Corporation SC - Scheduled Cast – Name of a community in India SEIAA - State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority SEMU - Social and Environmental Management Unit SH - State highway SO2 - Sulphur Dioxide SOI - Survey of India SPCB - State Pollution Control Board SPL - Sound Pressure Level SPM - Suspended Particulate Matter SPS - ADB Safeguard Policy Statement, 2009 ST - Scheduled Tribes TA - Technical assistance TDS - Total dissolved solids TSS - Total Suspended Solids UNESCO - United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization USEPA - United States Environmental Protection Agency UT - Union Territories ZSI - Zoological survey of India

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES dB(A) – A-weighted decibel ha – hectare

km – kilometre µg – microgram m – meter MW (megawatt) – megawatt PM 2.5 or 10 – Particulate Matter of 2.5 micron or 10 micron size

NOTE In this report, "$" refers to US dollars.

This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. Project Background and Rationale 1 B. Nature, Size and Location of Subproject Roads 3 C. Objective and Scope of the Study 5 D. Methodology Adopted for IEE Study 6 E. Structure of the Report 8 II. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK 9 A. National (India) Environmental Policies and Regulatory Framework 9 B. International Treaties and Relevance to the Project 12 C. ADB Safeguard Policy Statement Requirements 12 D. Category of the Project as per SPS 2009 13 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 14 A. Type of Project 14 B. Location and Features of the Project Road 15 C. Engineering Surveys and Investigations 21 D. Current and Projected Daily Traffic 21 E. Proposed Improvement 21 F. Construction Camps 30 G. Project Cost 31 H. Construction Packaging and Implementation Schedule 31 I. Project Benefits 31 IV. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 32 A. Introduction 32 B. Physical Environment 32 C. Biological Environment 50 D. Socio-economic Environment 56 V. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 65 A. Introduction 65 B. Positive Environmental Impacts due to improvement of subproject road sections 66 C. Adverse Environmental Impacts due to improvement of subproject road sections 66 D. Impacts Related to Project Location, Preliminary Planning and Design 67 E. Environmental Impacts - Construction Stage 70 F. Environmental Impacts - Operation Phase 101 G. Cumulative and Induced Environmental Impacts 102 H. Potential Environmental Enhancement/ Protection Measures 103 VI. CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS AND RISKS 104 VII. CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE 111 A. Objectives of the Consultations 111 B. Methodology for Consultations 111 C. Interaction with Local/National and International NGOs 116 D. Public Disclosure 116 VIII. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM 117

IX. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 119 A. Introduction 119 B. Objectives of Environmental Management Plan 119 C. Impacts and Mitigation Measures 119 D. Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Program 121 E. Environmental Reporting System 123 F. Institutional Requirements 125 G. Environmental Management Budget 129 X. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 132

APPENDICES Appendix 1: ADB’s Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Checklist 134 Appendix 2: List of Proposed Road Sections and Packages 137 Appendix 3: Comparison of World Bank and GoI Ambient Air Quality Standards 139 Appendix 4: Comparison of WB EHS and GoI Ambient Noise Level Standards 140 Appendix 5: Indian Standard Drinking Water Specification: II 10500:1991 141 Appendix 6: Record of Public Consultations 142 Appendix 7: GRM Information Sheet 185 Appendix 8: Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan 190 Appendix 9: Guidelines for Tree Plantation and Management 269 Appendix 10: Guidelines for Borrow Area Management 271 Appendix 11: Guidelines for Emergency Management System 273 Appendix 12: Guidelines for Waste Disposal and Management 276 Appendix 13: Outline of an Environmental Monitoring Report 278 Appendix 14: Impacts of Climate Change on Road Transport in the State of Madhya Pradesh281

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Proposed Improvement Plan for MDRs 1 Table 2: Selected Subproject under the Project 2 Table 3: Primary and Secondary Information Sources 6 Table 4: Summary of Relevant Environmental Legislation 9 Table 5: Applicable Permits and Clearances Required for the Subprojects 11 Table 6: Summary Road Components and Design Standard 14 Table 7: Existing conditions of Road Sections 20 Table 9: Summary of Climatic Condition of Project Districts 34 Table 10: Topography and Land Use along the Subproject Road Sections 35 Table 11: Geological Features of the State 36 Table 12:Soil Quality alongthe Subproject Road Sections 40 Table 13: Main Rivers / Stream crossing the project road sections 42 Table 14: Water Quality Characteristics along the Project Roads 45 Table 15: Details of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations 46 Table 16: Techniques Used for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring 47 Table 17: Summary of AAQM Results along the Subproject Road Sections (Average Values) 48 Table 18: Details of Noise Level Monitoring Locations 49 Table 19: Ambient Noise Level in decibel (A) along the Project Road 50 Table 20: Area under Forest type in the Districts 51 Table 21: Detail of forest location along the project sections 53 Table 22: Detail of trees within formation width of the project Road alignments (to be cut) 54 Table 23: Protected Area Network in the State of Madhya Pradesh 54 Table 24: Demographic Features of State and Project Districts as per 2011 census 57 Table 25: Land Use Pattern of the State 57 Table 26: Physical /Sensitive Features along the subproject roads 60 Table 27: List of Key Villages and Water Bodies along the subproject roads 63 Table 28: Activity-Impact Identification Matrix 65 Table 29: Road wise Detail of Trees to be cut and planted 67 Table 30: Clearances and Permits Required for the Subprojects 71 Table 31: Impact on Air Quality during Construction Stage 74 Table 31: Emission factors for different types of Vehicle (ARAI, 2007) 76 Table 32: Weighted Emission Factor for proposed traffic 76 Table 33: CO predicted concentrations (ppm) along the proposed road for peak traffic hour 78 3 Table 34: PM2.5 predicted concentrations (µg/m ) along the proposed road for peak traffic hour 78 3 Table 35: PM10 predicted concentrations (µg/m ) along the proposed road for peak traffic hour78 Table 36: Baseline pollutant concentration (µg/m3) at different locations 80 Table 38: Construction Noise / Distance Relationship 88 Table 39: Likely Impact on Noise Quality in the Vicinity of Project Area 88 Table 40: Typical noise levels of principal construction equipments 88 Table 40: Hourly traffic average traffic data at Dharna-Dharmkuwa Road 91 Table 41: Predicted noise level along the selected road corridor 91 Table 43: Potential Effects on Topography by the Proposed Road Sections Upgrading 95 Table 44:CO2 Emission Factors 104 Table 45:Emission Standards of Fleet (%) 105 Table 46: Estimated Total CO2 Emissions during Road Construction 105 Table 47: Project CO2 Emissions Intensity Indicators 106 Table 48: Project C02 Emissions Intensity indicators 107 Table 49: Details of Climate Adaptation Measures with Cost Implications 110 Table 50: Subproject wise details of the Public consultation 111 Table 51:Summary of Issues Discussed and Measures Taken 114 Table 52: Peoples’ Perception about Environmental Scenario 115 Table 53: Details of Trees to be Cut and Planted 120 Table 54: Stage-wise Reporting System of PIU 124 Table 55: Environmental Management Cost Estimate 130

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location of Subproject Road Alignments on State Map 4 Figure 2: Google Earth Image showing Subproject alignment 16 Figure 3: Typical Cross Sections 22 Figure 4: Geological Map of Madhya Pradesh and Project Areas 37 Figure 5: Soil Map of Madhya Pradesh and Project Areas 38 Figure 6: Seismic Zoning Map of India showing Project Road Locations (Source: IS 1893 - Part I: 2002) 41 Figure 7: Forest Map of Madhya Pradesh State 52 Figure 8: Protected Area Map of Madhya Pradesh State 55 Figure 9: CO predicted concentrations (ppm) along the proposed Road 79 3 Figure 10: PM2.5 predicted concentrations (µg/m ) along the proposed Road 79 3 Figure 11: PM10 predicted concentrations (µg/m ) along the proposed Road 79 Figure 12: Spatial distribution of CO concentrations 80 Figure 13: Spatial distribution of PM2.5 concentrations 83 Figure 14: Spatial distribution of PM10 concentrations 85

Figure 15: Contour plot of noise level along the road corridor in year 2016 91 Figure 16: Contour plot of noise level along the road corridor in year 2020 92 Figure 17: Contour plot of noise level along the road corridor in year 2025 92 Figure 18: Contour plot of noise level along the road corridor in year 2030 92 Figure 19: Contour plot of noise level along the road corridor in year 2035 93 Figure 20: Contour plot of noise level along the road corridor in year 2040 93 Figure 21: Contour plot of noise level along the road corridor in year 2047 93 Figure 22: Conceptual Drawing of the Noise Barrier 94 Figure 23: Grievance Redress Mechanism 118

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A. Introduction

1. This report summarizes the findings and results of the Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) for twelve (12) subprojects proposed for financing under in ADB’s Madhya Pradesh Major District Roads II Sector Project (the Project). The Project aimed to improve transport connectivity in the state by rehabilitating and upgrading priority Major District Roads (MDRs). The Project constitutes (i) rehabilitating and upgrading 1280 km of MDRs (ii) improving road maintenance and asset management and (iii) developing an efficient accident response system. About 50 road sections packaged into 20 civil works contract packages have been proposed for financing under this project. This IEE covers 12 road section (subprojects) totaling 362.2 km road length and packaged into five (5) contract packages.

2. The subproject roads are located in Madhya Pradesh State of India. The report also briefly describes the subprojects, existing environmental conditions in the subproject areas, anticipated environmental impacts and corresponding mitigation measures, public consultation process, the environmental management plan (EMP) and its monitoring plan. The Project is categorized as environment Category B as per SPS 2009 categorization criteria. REA Checklist is attached as Appendix 1. The Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) for the proposed subprojects has been carried out as part of project preparation and in compliance with ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) 2009 requirements. Since the subproject roads will be upgraded within existing available RoW, no Environmental Clearance is required for the proposed road widening subprojects as per EIA Notification 2006 of GOI.

B. Description of the Subprojects

3. The subproject roads are located in Rewa zone of Madhya Pradesh State covering seven districts namely Rewa, Satna, Sidhi, Singrauli, Shadol, Annuppur and Umaria. The total length of the subproject roads is about 362 km. The lengh of individual road sections varies from 20 km to 60 km. The proposed road sections are part of the major district road network on Madhya Pradesh. The existing road sections are mostly single lane district roads with carriageway width vary from 3.0 m to 7.0 m with earthen shoulders. Formation width varies from 5.0m to 9.0m. The sub project roads run through plain, rolling & hilly terrain and passing across several agricultural land, villages, and towns. The existing pavement is bituminous in most of the road section, but CC pavement can also be found in few sections. The overall riding quality is fair to poor. The condition of shoulders is also poor which are now mostly covered with vegetation. There is no formal drainage system along the roads. Major traffic on these roads is of passenger vehicles except in Bhatura-Bhadanpur road where the road carries large numbers of commercial vehicles of Kymore cement factory and in Persona-Mada road because of its location nearer to Singrauli industrial areas. The current average daily traffic on the sub project roads are relatively low and varying between 233 PCU to 1058 PCU, except in Bhatura- Bhadanpur road where the current average daily traffic is 2127 PCU.

4. It is proposed to improve these MDRs to minimum intermediate lane configuration (5.5 m carriageway and 2.25 m hard shoulders on both sides) except in Bhatura-Bhadanpur, where 2- lane proposed. In urban areas or in forest sections the improvement will be restricted to the existing ROW. Adequate cross drainage structures have been proposed in all the subprojects.

C. Description of Environment ii

5. Physical Environment: The subproject areas experience typical tropical climate. The topography of the subproject areas is mixed type with some sections passing through roiling to hilly terrain. Land use is predominantly agriculture except in Mada-Ramgarh, jhurai-Sarai, Harphari-Khaira & Sohagpur-Manpur road land use pattern is predominantly forest, followed· by open areas and residential areas. Subprojects are situated in Keymore Plateau & Satpura Hills sub group of Central Plateau & Hill Region agro climatic zone which is characterized as having very deep soils with texture ranging from sandy loan to clay in the surface and clay loam in the sub-soils with sub-angular blocky dominant texture. The soil type in the areas is mainly sandy clayey loam. No black soil found in the sub project areas. Nitrogen content is varying between 60.0-65.0 mg/1000g and is poor in organic carbon content. The sub project road sections cross major river system of the state like Sone etc. However there are number of small streams and tributary rivers crossing the subproject roads.

6. The water quality in the area is hard in nature with total hardness level ranging from 290 to 315 mg/l. Overall the ground water quality in the project areas in good. Air quality is also well within NMOS standards. Maximum concentration of PM10 is 76 µg/m3 found at Harphari Village (Km. 2+050) on Harphari-Khaira-Misirgawan Road and Bhatura village (at Km 18+600) on Bhatura-Bhadanpur road, whereas maximum concentration of PM2.5 is 25µg/m3 found at Bhatura village (at Km 18+600) on Bhatura-Bhadanpur road and Raigaon village (at Km 7+000) on Jharkua-Raigaon road.

7. Both of Day time noise levels (varying between 45.0 to 47.0 dB (A)) as well as night time noise levels (varying between 35.0 to 39.0 dB (A)) are within the prescribed limits of 55 dB (A) in day time and 45 dB (A) in night time.

8. Biological Environment: The subproject districts in general have moderate to high percentage of forest cover (e.g Umariya, Sidhi, Singrauli). All the sub project districts have the forest cover below state average except Umariya, Shidhi & Singrauli. Most of the subproject roads are passing through plain/rolling terrain with land use being agriculture except Mada- Ramgarh, Jhurai-Sarai, Harphari-Khaira & Sohagpur-Manpur roads are passing through reserve forest areas of Madhya Pradesh State. About 16.5 km (73 percent) of the road length of Ramgarh-Mada road, 12.5 (35 percent) road lengths of Jhurai-Sarai road and 4.8 km (18 percent) of Harphari-Khaira-Misirgawan road are passing through forest areas. About 3378 trees are likely to be cut for the implementation of the improvements proposed under the project for 11 selected subprojects. Subproject road sections do not pass through any protected area such as Wildlife Sanctuary, National park or bio –reserve except some part of the Sohagpur- Manpur road is traversing through Bandhavgarh Reserve area. There is no wildlife sanctuary, national park or bio-reserve within 10 km from the sample subproject roads. No rare or endangered species found in corridor of impact along the subproject roads.

9. Socio-economic Environment: No archaeological and historical monuments are located along the project roads in Mada-Ramgarh, where Mada Caves are located within 2 Km radius of the road. However, small religious structures are located within the existing RoW, but these religious structures will not be affected due to proposed improvement activities under the project.

D. Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures

1. Design and Construction Phase

10. Impact on Physiography and Topography: Since proposed subprojects only involves widening of existing road within available ROW without any land acquisition, impacts on the iii physiography of the area would be insignificant during both construction and operation phases. The design will consider the improvement of roadside drainage conditions through the improvement of cross-drainage structures. Design of the cross drainage structures will follow IRC Guidelines (IRC, 1995).

11. Potential Environmental Impacts on Soil: Since all activities will occur within the available RoW, no adverse environmental impacts are anticipated on the productive soil. Land taken on lease for access roads and for construction camps will be restored to its original land use.

12. Land clearing and grubbing will remove vegetation and soil cover which may cause some soil erosion during monsoon. Excavations in borrow pits may lead to loss of top soil and soil erosion. There is risk of stream and river bank erosion near bridges and cross drainage works. To avoid or minimize erosion, land clearing and grubbing will be conducted during dry season, productive top soils from borrow pits will be stored and reused in road embankment slope protection. Erosion control measures like silt screens will be installed along rivers and nallahs.

13. There is the risk of contamination of soil from construction material and oil spills. Contractors are required to ensure proper handling materials and able to implement spills containment. Oil contaminated waste will be properly collected, stored, and disposed through 3rd party service providers. All fuel and lubricant storage and handling areas will be located at least 500 meters from the nearest water body and provided with perimeter interceptor drains. All construction debris will be disposed by the Contractor on pre-designated areas as identified by the CSC-Environmental Specialist.

14. Impact on Water Resources and Drainage: Deterioration of water quality may occur near the construction camp and active construction camps. This will be minimized by timing land clearing and earthmoving during the dry season; proper handling of materials including oil, and lubricants; prohibiting the disposal of untreated sewage; and proper erosion control near rivers and nallahs.

15. Impact on Ambient Air Quality: Significant amount of dust will be generated during project construction. The following mitigation measures will also be undertaken:

i) Asphalt and hot-mix plants will be located at least 1 km away from any inhabited urban and rural stretches along the road with the NOC from the MP Pollution Control Board. ii) Sprinkling of water on the active construction fronts and construction yard. iii) Regular maintenance of machinery and equipment.

16. Substantial noise will be generated from the use of heavy equipment and processing of rocks and asphalt. Adequate distance separating the rock crusher and hotmix plants will be required and the sourcing of “ready-made” gravel and asphalt will be promoted to avoid the establishment of these plants. Along the roads particularly near sensitive sites like schools and temples, the use of less noisy equipments, scheduling of noisy activities, and provision of noise barriers will be implemented by the contractor to minimize disturbance.

17. Impact on Flora, Fauna and Ecosystem: Clearing and grubbing activities will result to the removal of shrubs, grasses, and an estimated 3378 trees. All cut trees will be compensated at the rate of 1:10 with preference to fast growing local species that are more efficient in absorbing carbon emissions. iv

18. Construction Workers’ Camp: As the Contractors are required to source labor from the local communities along the subproject roads, the size of the construction camps will be relatively small. It is the contractual responsibility of the Contractors to maintain a hygienic camp with adequate water and electric supply; toilet facilities located away from the water bodies and wells; proper disposal of domestic refuse; temporary medical facilities; pest control; clean and adequate food; and security.

19. Impacts on Social Environment: Construction and operation phases of project road will have some beneficial impact on social environment. Some increase in income of local people is expected as local unskilled, semiskilled and skilled persons may gain direct or indirect employment during construction phase. Since the immigration of work force during construction phase is likely to be very small, the social impacts on literacy, health care, transport facilities and cultural aspects are expected to be insignificant.

2. Operation Phase

20. Increase in vehicular emissions, noise level, road crashes due to higher speed vehicular speed, and oil contaminated road surface runoff will occur during project operation phase. The impact on air quality is not expected to be significant given the low projected traffic. Community safety is enhanced through the crash barriers, speed brakes, traffic signs, and pavement markers. Oil contamination will occur but expected to be in trace amounts based on the low level vehicular traffic. To control the anticipated increase in noise level measures such as good road surface will reduce the road-tire noise, prohibition of horns along sensitive areas, road widening will increase capacity and decrease congestion of vehicles, and compensatory tree plantation will be located near sensitive areas will be implemented.

21. Climate Change impacts: Sector specific climate risks screening has been done for overall transport sector of Madhya Pradesh to analyse impact on road components due to likely change in climatic variables, mainly temperature and precipitation. Projections have been made for 2080s. Given the projected variations of temperature1 and precipitation the project roads were screened for different types of climate risks and impact on road components. Key engineering measures taken to address flood risks in the design are: i) increase in embankment height, ii) construction of new side and lead away drains, iii) construction of new culverts and widening of existing ones and iv) widening of bridges. The costs for taking these measures add up to a total of Rs. 97.69 crores. An assessment on CO2 emissions that was carried out using the Transport Emissions Evaluation Models for Projects (TEEMP) tool shows that the total CO2 emission at business-as-usual scenario is estimated at 26401.92 tons/year and without-and with-induced traffic are 27269.76 tons/year and 37922.25 tons/year, respectively.. These values are below the 100,000 tons per year threshold set in the ADB SPS 2009.

E. Public Consultation and Information Disclosures

22. Publicconsultations havebeencarriedoutat several locations on each subproject road sectionduringinitial surveys. In total over 40 consultation session were organized involving over 500 participants. It include 231 (31%) female and 520 (69%) male participants. Public

1The average surface daily maximum temperatures, in the period 2030s is projected to rise by 1.8-2.0oC throughout Madhya Pradesh and the daily minimum temperature is projected to rise between 2.0oC to 2.4oC during the same period; the eastern half of the state experiencing more warming than the western half. By 2080s, the maximum temperature is projected to rise between 3.4oC to 4.4oC with northern region experiencing warmer temperatures v consultations have been carried out in the project area during the feasibility as well as detailed design stage.

23. Most of the people interviewed strongly support the subprojects. The people living in the entire project areas expect the different project elements to facilitate transport, employment, tourism, boost economic development and thereby provide direct,orindirect,benefitsto them.

24. The IEE will be disclosed in the English language in the office of MPRDC and also to the public through the ADB website.

25. The implementation arrangements basically follow the ongoing ADB loans for State Highwaysand MDRs with the following improvements: i) expansion of the Environmental and Social Cell (ESC) staff from 1 to 4 with the recruitment of two social safeguard and one environmental safeguard officers; ii) MPRDC’s ten division offices acting as Project Implementation Units (PIUs) will appoint a social and environment safeguards focal person; and iii) environmental specialist from the Construction Supervision Consultant will provide technical support to MPRDC and PIU for the implementation of environment safeguards.

F. Environmental Management Plan

26. Civil works contract package specific fully budgeted environmental management plans have been prepared for mitigation/management/avoidance of the potential adverse impacts and enhancement of various environmental components along the project road sections. For each mitigation measures to be carried out its location, timeframe, implementation and overseeing/ supervising responsibilities has been identified. Monitoring plan for construction and operation phase has been framed to ensure effective implementation of EMP.

27. The monitoring program included performance indicators for water, air, and noise level monitoring, frequency of monitoring, and institutional arrangements of the project in the construction and operation stages, along with the estimated cost. The reporting system included roles and responsibilities of each party involved in the project implementation i.e. PIU, Supervision Consultant and Contractors and reporting mechanisms during implementation and operation phases.

28. An environmental management budget of INR 78,499,000 (Indian Rupees Seventy eight million four hundred ninety nine thousand only) has been estimated for implementation of the environmental management plan. This budget also includes cost of environmental monitoring and associated trainings.

G. Conclusions and Recommendations

29. The findings of the IEE shows that overall the project has limited and short term environmental impacts. Effective EMP implementation will ensure elimination and minimization of identified adverse impacts. MPRDC shall ensure that EMP and EMoP is included in the Bill of Quantity (BOQ) and forms part of bid document and civil works contract for each package. If there is any change in the project design the EMP and EMOP will be updated accordingly. MPRDC needs capacity building and practical exposure. Adequate training shall be imparted as proposed under environmental management plan to enhance the capability of concerned EA and IA officials.

I. INTRODUCTION

A. Project Background and Rationale

1. The state of Madhya Pradesh, in its present form, came into existence in November 2000 following its bifurcation to create the new state of Chhattisgarh. It is the second largest state in the country, with an area of about 308,000 sq.km and population of about 73 million.2 Madhya Pradesh is amongst the poorer states in the country, and its per capita income is about 60% of the national average. However, the state’s gross state domestic product (GSDP) grew at a compound annual growth rate of about 8.5% during FY2005-FY2014, being fostered through a series of development measures. These include the Pithampur–Dhar–Mhow region as a key node on the Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor extent in Madhya Pradesh, many notified industrial areas, and industrial growth centers. However, agriculture is the mainstay of the state's economy and about 73% of the people live in rural areas. The dispersed nature of industrial development and agricultural production means that the road network is a critical element of the economic infrastructure. The state has a road network of about 127,000 km, out of which about 4700 km are National Highways, 11,000 km are state highways (SHs), and about 20,000 km are MDRs. Rural roads make up the balance road network. The number of annually registered vehicles in the state has increased at an average annual rate of 9.7% since 2003 to reach about 8.8 million vehicles in 2013.3 Estimates by MPRDC indicate that vehicular growth over the 2011-2021 period will be over 7% per annum.4 Commensurate with this increase in vehicle ownership, the average daily traffic has also been increasing. Increased traffic will need both increased road capacity to maintain service levels, as well as better maintenance.

2. The state is close to completing its program of upgrading its entire state highway network with a combination of budgetary allocations, ADB support in three previous loans, and public-private partnerships.5 However, MDRs have had marginal attention, and major portions of the MDRs still need to be upgraded. Government of Madhya Pradesh has now taken up improvement of MDRs as a critical part of the state road core network, which are being improved in a planned manner. ADB has sanctioned one previous loan for improvement of MDRs.6 MDRs form a key link in the road network between the rural roads and the state highways. Continued development of this network will foster inclusiveness by enabling larger segments of the state’s population to better access markets and basic services. The Madhya Pradesh Roads Development Corporation (MPRDC) specifically, targeting MDRs to form key linkage between rural, semi urban and urban areas and complete state road connectivity. Table 1 indicates the proposed plan of GoMP to improve the MDRs in the State.

Table 1: Proposed Improvement Plan for MDRs Total MDRs in Madhya Pradesh - (Km) 19,429 Recently completed or under construction by MPPWD - 1,906 (Under Central Road Fund Scheme) (Under HUDCO Scheme) - 1,240 (Under Plan Scheme) - 556 (Under BOT – Toll + Annuity Scheme) - 645

2 Government of India, 2011. Census Data 2011. New Delhi 3 Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, 2014. Road Transport Yearbook (2012-2013). New Delhi 4 Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation, 2013. Development Plan for State Roads in Madhya Pradesh 2013-2033. Bhopal 5 The loans are: 1959-IND Madhya Pradesh State Roads Sector Development Project; 2330-IND Madhya Pradesh State Roads Sector Project (MPSRSP)-II; and 2736-IND Madhya Pradesh State Roads Project-III. 6 The loan is 3189-IND: Madhya Pradesh District Connectivity Sector Project. 2

Total MDRs in Madhya Pradesh - (Km) 19,429 Recently completed or under Construction by MPRDC - 515 (Under build operate transfer (BOT) Toll + Annuity & Annuity Scheme) (Under BOT Toll) - 38 (Under BOT Annuity) - 1103 (Under ABD IV) - 1528 Total recently completed or under construction - 7531 In good condition - 4679 Proposed under this Project a 1500 Balance to be constructed through other means - 5,719 a The actual estimates will depend on the assessment from the DPRs. Source: MPRDC

3. The GoMP has requested financing from the ADB to implement part of its proposed improvement plan for MDR. The proposed Madhya Pradesh District Roads II Sector Project (the Project) will improve transport connectivity in the state by rehabilitating and upgrading major district roads (MDRs). The Project constitutes (i) rehabilitating and upgrading of about 1280 km of MDRs; (ii) cashless accident victim treatment facility piloting; and (iii) improving and mainstreaming an efficient accident response system. About 50 subprojects road sections packaged into 20 contract packages have been proposed for financing under this sector project. Appendix 2 present the list of possible subprojects proposed for financing under the project.

4. Since the road sections are small these are packaged in five groups for the purpose of environmentalassessment. Accordingly five separate IEEs have been prepared for the project roads. This IEE covers following 12 Major District Roads (MDRs) of subprojects totaling 362.2 km road length and packaged into five (5) contract packages. These subprojects roads were selected to reflect the widest geographical dispersion of roads across the state to capture the range of environmental settings and anticipate the environmental impacts of the subprojects under the sector loan. The construction period for all roads under the project will include a 12 – 24 month construction period and a 5 year performance based maintenance period.

Table 2: Selected Subproject under the Project S. Contract Length Name of Road District No. Package (km) 1 Kharamseda Kirhai Ramgarh Road Satna 34.35 2 Package 16 Jharkua Raigaon Karsara Road Satna 23.95 3 Bhatura Bhadpur Barrakhurd Road Satna 20.05 4 Parsona Mada Road Singrauli 24.39 5 Package 18 Ramgarh Mada Road Singrauli 19.87 6 Harphari Khaira Misirgawan via Shivpurva Road Singrauli 25.99 Package 17 7 Chitrangi-Garhwa Road Singrauli 22.67 Anuppur & 8 Anuppur Jaitpur Road 36.66 Shahdol Package 20 9 Gohparu Rasmohni Budhar (via Bathiya) Road Shahdol 39.94 10 Pasgarhi Devri Janakpur Road Shahdol 23.49 11 Package 18 Jhurai – Sarai Road Singrauli 31.44 12 Package 19 Sohagpur – Manpur Road Umaria 59.40 Total 362.20

Source: MPRDC DPRs 3

5. As part of detailed project report (DPR) preparation this IEE report was prepared to cover selected 12 subprojects. All discussions thereafter focus only on these 12 subprojects to be taken up in five packages numbered as Package 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20. The IEE has been carried out in compliance with the requirements of ADB’s SPS 2009. This IEE report will be disclosed in the MPRDC and ADB websites.

B. Nature, Size and Location of Subproject Roads

6. The subproject activities involve improvement of existing major district road sections within available ROW. There are 12 subprojects covering a total road length of about 362 km for which widening and up-gradation have been proposed under this Trench. The road widening activities primarily will comprise of raising the embankment at certain locations and its stabilization including construction of retaining wall if required especially near water bodies overlay on the existing carriageway, junction improvement, and construction of minor bridges, culvert and RCC drain in built-up section. Figure 1 shows the location of subproject roads on state map.

7. All MDRs to be upgraded under the project will follow the existing road alignment7and limited to the designed right-of-way (RoW) of 25m and 15m for open and built-up areas, respectively. The proposed subproject roads will have standard carriageway width of 5.5m rigid pavement and earthen shoulder of 2.5m width either side general except in Bhatura-Bhadanpur road where 2-lane has been proposed (7.0m C/W with 2.0m hard shoulders either side). In congested built-up stretches where considerable water accumulation on road is noticed, side drain in such stretches has been proposed. The provision of toe wall will be made where the road is passing through forest section to minimize the requirement of ROW. In built-up stretches where considerable commercial activity is noticed, 1.0 m wide footpath is proposed on both sides. The side drain in such stretches will be accommodated under the footpath. Minimum width of utility corridor will be 2.0 m. All road embankments will have at least 1m freeboard designed from a 20-year high flood level (HFL). All bridges having less than 30m length will have at least 0.60m freeboard at 50-year HFL and those with more than 30m length will have at least 0.9m at 100-year HFL.

7Minor geometric realignments will occur to comply with horizontal design requirements and minimize or avoid shifting of utilities, community properties and tree cutting 4

Figure 1: Location of Subproject Road Alignments on State Map

8. The majority of subproject roads are located in Rewa zone of Madhya Pradesh State covering seven districts namely Rewa, Satna, Sidhi, Singrauli, Shadol, Annuppur and Umaria. The total length of the subproject roads is about 362 km. The lengh of individual road sections varies from 20 km to 60 km. The proposed road sections are part of the major district road network on Madhya Pradesh.

9. The The existing road sections are mostly single lane district roads with carriageway width varies from 3.0 m to 7.0 m with earthen shoulders. Formation width varies from 5.0m to 9.0m. The sub project roads run through plain, rolling & hilly terrain and passing across several agricultural land, villages, and towns. The existing pavement is bituminous in most of the road section, but CC pavement can also be found in few sections. The overall riding quality is fair to poor. The condition of shoulders is also poor which are now mostly covered with vegetation. There is no formal drainage system along the roads. Major traffic on these roads is of passenger vehicles except in Bhatura-Bhadanpur road where the road carries large numbers of commercial vehicles of Kymore cement factory and in Persona-Mada road because of its location nearer to Singrauli industrial areas. The current average daily traffic on the sub project roads are relatively low and varying between 233 PCU to 1058 PCU, except in Bhatura- Bhadanpur road where the current average daily traffic is 2127 PCU.

C. Objective and Scope of the Study

10. This IEE report documents the environmental assessment of the road subproject and identifies the environmental issues to be considered in the project planning and design stages. In this report, the different activities that are likely to take place to achieve the project objectives have been analysed and the potential impacts that may accompany them have been identified, assessed for significance, and concomitant avoidance, mitigation, and compensation measures were prepared in consultation with stakeholders to be incorporated on the engineering design and project implementation. The IEE addresses the environmentalmanagement requirements of the Government of India (GOI) and Asian Development Bank.Specifically, this report:

 provides information about the baseline environmental setting of the subprojects.  provides information on potential environmental impacts of the proposed subproject activities with its magnitude, distribution and duration.  provides information on required mitigation measures with cost to minimize the impacts.  analyses the alternatives options considering alternative locations, designs, management approaches for selection of most feasible and environmental acceptable options.  provides details of stakeholder’s consultations.  designs an environmental management and monitoring plan with institutional measures for effective implementation of mitigates measures proposed and addressing grievances.

11. The environmental studies have been confined to the situation around the deemed areas of direct influence caused by constructional and operational facilities along the proposed road sections. The IEE was based on proposed road alignment and key construction activities such as site clearing, removal of trees, excavation, filling, grading and embankment formation, excavation for utility trenches, subgrade preparation, base course and asphalt overlay, shoulder, and construction of permanent structures like retaining walls, culverts and drains. The IEE also covered ancillary activities like camp site establishment and maintenance, sourcing ofmaterials, and operation of equipment like rock crusher and hot mix plant. The corridor of impactis taken 6

as 10 meters either side of the alignment. However, the study area impact zone isconsidered up to 5 km on both sides of road alignment to allow for coverage of indirect andinduced impacts and a larger analysis of land use and other environmental features.Assessment is carried out on the following environment components: terrestrial and aquaticecology, soil, water, air, noise, and socio economic aspects.

12. The following sections of the report, discusses the methodology adopted by the consultants in conducting the IEE study and presents the results of the same.

D. Methodology Adopted for IEE Study

13. The InitialEnvironmental Examinationhas been carried out, in accordance with the requirements of the ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS 2009) and environmental regulations of GOI. The study was carried out using reconnaissance survey, field visits, consultation with stakeholders, review of existing data, identification of adverse impacts and preparation of environmental management and monitoring plans. The stepwise activities carried out include:

 Review of legal requirements  Review of feasibility technical study  Reconnaissance survey for identification of key issues data requirement andpreliminary consultation  Primary and secondary data collection  Consultation with stakeholders  Identification of impacts and mitigation measures.

14. The major steps in the IEE process for the project were as follows:

1. Collection and Analysis of Data

15. Data was collected on various environmental components such as soil, meteorology, geology, hydrology, water quality, flora and fauna, habitat, demography, land use, cultural properties etc, to establish the baseline environmental setup. Secondary data on environment for the subproject corridors were collected both from published and other relevant sources e.g., the Departments of Forest, Madhya Pradesh State Pollution Control Board, State Statistical Department etc. The data collection from the field was completed with the help of enumerators / investigators. The interviewers were trained for filling up the questionnaire at the site. To ensure the accuracy of the data it was collected under the supervision of the consultant. The type and source of information compiled in this IEE are shown in Table 3.

Table 3: Primary and Secondary Information Sources Information Sources Technical information on existing road features MPRDC Design Consultant and proposed Rehabilitation work. Inventorisation Ground physical surveys and graphics of road features; viz. water bodies community consultants structures, environmental sensitive location areas, congested locations, etc. Climatic Condition Indian Meteorological Department, ENVIS Website, NIC, primary data Collection Geology, Seismicity, Soil and Topography Geological survey of India, SOI Top sheets, Primary data collection 7

Information Sources Land Use/ Land Cover Survey of India (SoI) Topo-sheet, Observation during survey. Drainage Pattern Survey of India Topo-sheet and field observation Status of forest areas, Compensatory Divisional Forest Office, Seoni District. afforestation norms etc. Status of Fishing Activity District Fisheries Offices at SeoniDistrict Air quality Noise, Soil and Water Onsite monitoring and analysis of field samples during field visit Borrow Areas, Quarries and other construction material source River geo-morphology, hydrology, drainage, flood Feasibility report, field observations patterns Socioeconomic Environment Primary Census Abstract of SeoniDistrict 2011. Official websites maintained by state Govt., and Public Consultationduring the Field survey

2. Environmental Monitoring and Analysis

16. In order to assess the situation in particular sections of the subproject roads during the screening and site visit of the area, different locations were identified for monitoring and analysis the noise level, ambient air and water quality. The monitoring and analysis of water quality, air quality and noise level has been done by a leading environmental research laboratory. Air quality monitoring has been carried out as per MoEFCC notification of November 2009 the revised Air Quality standards and the on-site monitoring results are incorporated in Chapter- 4 of this IEE report.

3. Stakeholder and Public Consultations

17. Extensive consultations were held during different stages (reconnaissance, detailed design and design review) with key stakeholders that includes local and beneficiary population, government departments/agencies, road users, and project-affected persons. These consultations allowed the interaction between the stakeholders and road designers to identify road features and construction methods that will enhance road upgrading and minimize potential impacts. Information gathered was integrated in the project design and formulating mitigation measures and environmental management plan. Detailed description of public consultation is presented in Chapter-7 of this IEE report.

4. Assessment of Potential Impacts

18. Potential impacts were identified on the basis of: analytical review of baseline data; review of environmental conditions at site; analytical review of the underlying socio-economic conditions with the project influence area.

5. Preparation of the Environment Management Plan

19. An EMP for each contract package is prepared to specify the steps required to ensure that the necessary measures have been taken and the same will be incorporated during 8

construction and operation stage of the project. The EMP includes the monitoring plan giving details of the resources budgeted and the implementation arrangements.

E. Structure of the Report

20. This IEE report has been presented as per requirements of the ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) 2009. The report is organised into following ten chapters, a brief of each chapter is described below:

 Chapter 1 - Introduction: This section describes the background information about the project and IEE study.  Chapter 2 - Policy, Legal, and Administrative Frameworks: this section summarizing the national and local legal and institutional frameworks that guided the conduct of the assessment.  Chapter 3 - Project Description: This section presents the key features and components of the proposed project.  Chapter 4 - Description of the Environment: This section discussing the relevant physical, biological, and socioeconomic features that may be affected by the proposed project.  Chapter 5 - Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures: This section presents the environmental assessment of likely positive and adverse impacts attributed to the proposed project and concomitant mitigation measures.  Chapter 6 – Climate Change Impacts and Risks: This section presents an assessment of climate change impacts and risks due to the subprojects.  Chapter 7 - Consultation, Participation and Information Disclosure: This section describes the consultation process undertaken during the environmental examination and its results, their consideration in the project design, and manner of compliance to the ADB’s Publication Policy and related national laws.  Chapter 8 - Grievance Redress Mechanism: This section describing the formal and informal redress procedures for registering, resolving, and reporting complaints.  Chapter 9 - Environmental Management Plan: This section discussing the lessons from the impact assessment and translated into action plans to avoid, reduce, mitigate or compensate adverse impacts and reinforces beneficial impacts. This plan is divided into three sub-sections; mitigation, monitoring, and implementation arrangements  Chapter 10 - Conclusion and Recommendation: This section stating whether there is a need for further detailed environmental studies / assessments and highlights key findings and recommendations to be implemented by the borrower.

21. An Executive Summary is also prepared and presented in the beginning of the report. 9

II. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK

22. India has well defined institutional and legislative framework. The legislation covers all components of environment viz. air, water, soil, terrestrial and aquatic flora and fauna, natural resources, and sensitive habitats. India is also signatory to various international conventions and protocols. The environmental legislations in India are framed to protect the valued environmental components and comply with its commitment to international community under above conventions and protocols. Asian Development Bank has also defined its Environmental and Social Safeguard policies. This assessment is about the applicability of above laws and regulations, conventions, protocols, and safeguards. This section summaries the following:

 National (India) Environmental Legislation and Legal Administrative Framework,  ADB safeguard policies and categorisation of the project,  Summary of international treaties and applicability to the project

A. National (India) Environmental Policies and Regulatory Framework

23. The Government of India’s Environmental Legal Framework comprises a set of comprehensive acts and regulations aimed at conserving various components of the biological and physical environment including environmental assessment procedures and requirements for public consultation. The policies and requirements which are most relevant in the context of this project are provided in Table 4 below.

Table 4: Summary of Relevant Environmental Legislation Act Objective Responsible Institution Environment (Protection) Act To protect and improve the overall MoEFCC (1986) and Rules (1986) environment Environmental Impact Assessment To provide guidance on MoEFCC (EIA) Notification under environmental clearance Environmental Protection Rules requirements and clarification on (2006, 2009, 2011) and relevant related specific technical issues Office Memorandums (OM) Wildlife Protection Act (1972 and To protect wild animals and birds MoEFCC amended in 1993) through the creation of National Parks and Sanctuaries The Water (Prevention and Control To provide for the prevention and CPCB of Pollution) Act 1972 (Amended control of water pollution and the 1988) and Rules 1974 maintaining or restoring of wholesomeness of water. The Air (Prevention and Control of To provide for the prevention, control CPCB and Pollution) Act, 1981(Amended and abatement of air pollution, and Road 1987) and Rules 1982 for the establishment of Boards to Authorities carry out these purposes. Hazardous Waste (Management, To protection the general public State Pollution Handling and Trans-boundary against improper handling, storage Control Board Movement) Rules 2008 (Amended and disposal of hazardous wastes 2009), 10

Act Objective Responsible Institution The Forest (Conservation) Act 1980 To protect and manage forests MoEFCC (Amended 1988) and Rules 1981 (Amended 2003) Central Motor Vehicle Act (1988) To control vehicular air and noise State and Rules (1988) pollution. To regulate development of Transport the transport sector, check and Department control vehicular air and noise pollution. Ancient Monuments and Conservation of Cultural and Archaeological Archaeological Sites and Remains historical remains found in India. Dept. GOI Act (1958) Building and Other construction To regulate the employment and Ministry of workers (Regulation and the conditions of service of building and Labour and Employment and conditions of other construction workers and to Employment service) Act, 1996 provide for their safety, health and welfare measures Child labour (Prohibition and To regulate the employment of Ministry of Regulation) Act, 1986 children including age limits, type of Labour and employment, timing of work, Employment information disclosure and health and safety.

1. Requirement of Environmental Clearance

24. As per provisions of Environmental Impact Assessment Notification 2006 amended (2009), and its amendments, vide notification S.O.3067(E), dated the 1st December 2009 allState Highway expansion projects, except those in hilly terrain (above 1000 m AMSL) andecologically sensitive areas, have been exempted from Environmental Clearances.

25. Since, the subproject roads are major district roads and not a state highway, the above EIANotification, 2006 (amended till date) promulgated under Environment (Protection) Act 1986 isnot applicable for the subprojects included in the Project and hence no Environmental Clearance is required for the subprojects proposed for financing under the Project.

2. Forests Clearance

26. As per Indian Forests Conservation Act (1980), any project requiring diversion of forestsland for non-forestry purposes require forest clearance from MoEFCC for the same. The forestryclearance is granted through two stages process.

27. Since the proposed improvement work for twelve subprojects will be limited to the existing ROW and no diversion of forestland is involved in these roads, no forest clearance is required for these roads.

3. Permission to Withdraw Ground Water

28. As per the power Granted under Environmental Protection Act, 1986, Permission from Central Ground Water Authority is required for extracting ground water for construction purposes, from areas declared as critical or semi critical from ground water potential prospective.

4. Required Clearances/Permissions

29. For up-gradation of the subproject roads, required clearances/ permissions related to environment and forests have been summarized in Table 5.

Table 5: Applicable Permits and Clearances Required for the Subprojects S. Permissions/ Acts/ Rules/ Concerned Responsibility No. Clearances Notifications/Guidelines Agency A. Pre-constructionStage 1 Permission for Forest Conservation Act District Forest MPRDC cutting of trees (1980) Procedural Office/State Guidelines developed by Forest Department for the Department of trees felling in forest Environment, areas and District Government of M. P. Authorities in non- under the orders of the forests Areas Honorable High Court (Compensatory tree Tree removal will be plantation to be made guided as per state 1:10 as per the government rules. permission granted) B. ImplementationStage 2 Consent to Air (Prevention M.P. State Pollution Contractor operate hot mix andControl Pollution) Act Control Board plant, Crushers, of1981 (To be obtained Batching plant before installation) 3 Authorization for Hazardous M.P. StatePollution Contractor disposal of Waste(Management ControlBoard(To be hazardous waste andHandling) Rules 1989 obtained before generation) 4 Consent for Water (Prevention and M.P. StatePollution Contractor Disposal of Control of Pollution) Act ControlBoard sewage from 1974 (Before setting up the labor camps camp) 5 Pollution Under Central Motor and Department Contractor Control Vehicle Act 1988 ofTransport, Certificate Government of M.P.authorized testing centers 6 Employing The Building and Other District Labour Contractor Labour/Workers Construction Workers Commissioner (Regulation and Employment Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 12

30. Before the start of civil works for the any section of the subproject roads the project proponent (MPRDC) must obtain necessary clearances / permits from statutory authorities.

B. International Treaties and Relevance to the Project

31. India has been playing an active role in environmental conservation since the first United Nations (UN) conference on Human Environment in Stockholm in 1972 and recognizes that protection of environment is closely linked to combating poverty. Key international agreements that India is signatory to and relevant for the project are provided below:

(i) Convention Relative to the conservation of Flora and Fauna in their Natural State(1933) (ii) International Plan Protection Convention (1951) (iii) Convention on Wetlands of International Importance, Especially as Waterfowl Habitat (Ramsar,1971) (iv) Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage(Paris, 1972) (v) Convention in International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna andFlora (Washington, 1973) (vi) Convention on Migratory Species of Wild Animals (Bonn, 1979) (vii) Convention on the Prior Informed Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade (PIC or Rotterdam, 1990) (viii) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Rio De Janeiro,1992) (ix) Convention on Biological Diversity (Rio De Janeiro, 1992) (x) Protocol to the United Nations Convention on Climate Change (Kyoto, 1997)

32. The above list of international conventions served as requirements for the project to comply. However, due to the limited scale of the road upgrading and the predicted trafficincrease during operation, the expected environmental issues that are governed by theseinternational convention would be insignificant.

C. ADB Safeguard Policy Statement Requirements

33. The Asian Development Bank has defined its Safeguard requirements under its ‘Safeguard Policy Statement 2009 (SPS 2009). The prime objectives of safeguard policy are to: (i) avoid adverse impacts of projects on the environment and affected people, where possible; and (ii) minimize, mitigate, and/or compensate for adverse project impacts on the environment and affected people when avoidance is not possible. This policy requires assessment, mitigation and commitment towards environmental protection. The extent of assessment depends on the category of the project. ADB’s SPS 2009 classify a project depending on following three categories.

 Category A: A proposed project is classified as category A if it is likely to have significant adverse environmental impacts that are irreversible, diverse, or unprecedented. These impacts may affect an area larger than the sites or facilities subject to physical works. An environmental impact assessment is required.  Category B: A proposed project is classified as category B if its potential adverse environmental impacts are less adverse than those of category A projects. These impacts are site-specific, none or very few of them are irreversible, and in most cases mitigation measures can be designed more readily than for category A 13

projects. An initial environmental examination is required.  Category C: A proposed project is classified as category C if it is likely to have minimal or no adverse environmental impacts. No environmental assessment is required although environmental implications need to be reviewed.

D. Category of the Project as per SPS 2009

34. The subproject roads have been evaluated and categorized using the prescribed ADB Rapid Environmental Assessment Checklist (see Appendix 1). The subprojects evaluated are classified as environmental category ‘B’. This categorization was primarily based on the following considerations:

(i) subproject roads are existing roads and upgrading activities are limited to the available RoW, (ii) anticipated impacts from road upgrading on relatively flat terrain along agricultural land are mostly site specific and easily mitigated through proper design and good construction practices, majority of the activities have short-term duration co- terminus with the construction phase, and (iii) subproject road does not pass through or located within 10 km from any wildlife sanctuary, national park, or any other environmentally sensitive or protected areas.

III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

A. Type of Project

35. The subproject roads are mostly located in Rewa zone of Madhya Pradesh State covering seven districts namely Rewa, Satna, Sidhi, Singrauli, Shadol, Annuppur and Umaria. The total length of the subproject roads is about 362 km. The lengh of individual road sections varies from 20 km to 60 km. The proposed road sections are part of the major district road network on Madhya Pradesh. The existing road sections are mostly single lane district roads with carriageway width vary from 3.0 m to 7.0 m with earthen shoulders. Formation width varies from 5.0m to 9.0m. The sub project roads run through plain, rolling & hilly terrain and passing across several agricultural land, villages, and towns. The existing pavement is bituminous in most of the road section, but CC pavement can also be found in few sections. The overall riding quality is fair to poor. The condition of shoulders is also poor which are now mostly covered with vegetation. There is no formal drainage system along the roads. Major traffic on these roads is of passenger vehicles except in Bhatura-Bhadanpur road where the road carries large numbers of commercial vehicles of Kymore cement factory and in Persona-Mada road because of its location nearer to Singrauli industrial areas. The current average daily traffic on the sub project roads are relatively low and varying between 233 PCU to 1058 PCU, except in Bhatura- Bhadanpur road where the current average daily traffic is 2127 PCU .

36. It is proposed to improve these MDRs to minimum intermediate lane configuration (5.5 m carriageway and 2.25 m hard shoulders on both sides) except in Bhatura-Bhadanpur, where 2- lane proposed (7.0m C/W with 2.0m hard shoulder either side). In urban areas or in forest sections the improvement will be restricted to the existing ROW. Adequate cross drainage structures have been proposed in all the subprojects. Table 6 present key project road features and design standards for subproject roads.

Table 6: Summary Road Components and Design Standard Parameter Details Road Length 362+200 Km Follow the exits road alignment. Except some of the Locations Alignment where geometric improvements is required. Flyovers/overpasses/ ROB There is no flyovers/overpasses/ ROB in the alignment. Major Bridges 13 Minor bridges, pipe culverts along the Project roads. (Replacement Other Structures of existing structure wherever required, provision of new structure alongside existing structure wherever required) During inventory and reconnaissance survey of project road it is found that the embankment height road is very low. Also as Embankment Design perlocal enquiry, the existing road top level at some locations is equal to HFL. The raising is required at these locations. As per IRC Codes and MORSTH Guidelines. Vertical Clearance 0.60 m above HFL for bridges upto 30 m length 0.90m above HFL for bridges above 30 m length The discharges Design Standard for which the bridge has been designed are maximum flood discharge on record for a period of 100 years for major bridges and 50 years for minor bridges. Design : 80 Km/h Speed Permissible : 65 km/h 15

Parameter Details As per IRC: 73 – 1980 Maximum value of 7% for super elevation Horizontal Controls and 15% for side friction factor, the minimum radius for horizontal curves is 230m for design speed 80Km/hr Vertical Controls Grade break of 0.5%, vertical curves will be provided. Carriageway: 5.5m wide CC pavement with 2.25m Hard shoulder either sidein general except in Bhatura-Bhadanpur road where 2- Carriageway lane has been proposed (7.0m C/W & 2.50m paver block shoulder in built-up) Cross fall will be 2.0% for pavement and 3% for hard shoulder Source: Detailed Project Report

B. Location and Features of the Project Road

37. The subproject roads are mostly located in Rewa zone of Madhya Pradesh State covering seven districts namely Rewa, Satna, Sidhi, Singrauli, Shadol, Annuppur and Umaria. Figure 2, shows the location of subproject alignment on google image. The description of the individual road is given subsequent sections. 16

Figure 2: Google Earth Image showing Subproject alignment

38. Kharamseda Kirhai Ramgarh Road:- the road section starts at Km 9/6 of Amarpatan - Badera Road (SH-13) in Kirhai village & terminates at Km 12/10 of Bela – Govindgarh Road (SH-49) in Mukundpur Town. The project road section lies totally in Satna district. Its length is 34.350 Km. Existing carriageway width varies from 3.0m to 5.5m with about 0.75m to 2.0m earthen shoulder on either side. The land use pattern on both side of the road is agricultural and build up.

39. Jharkua – Raigaon - Karsara Road:- It starts at Km 155/2 of Satna - Panna Road (NH- 75) Jharkua Tiraha & terminates at Km 28/8 of Sundra – Kothi Road (MDR) by Making T Intersection near Karsara Town. The project road lies totally in Satna district. Its length is 23.950 Km. There are a number of intersections along the road. Some of these junctions are very important viz., T Junction at Km 0.0 intersecting NH-75 which is going towards Satna - Panna & T junction at Km 23.950 intersecting MDR road connecting Sundra – Kothi. Existing carriageway width varies from 3.50m to 5.50m with about 1.00m to 1.50m earthen shoulder on either side. The carriageway is much below the basic width requirement which is also confirmed from the Traffic Analysis. Crossing of wheel loads on unpaved shoulders has been too frequent. Existing ROW was observed as per revenue map about 10m to 24m wide. However, the existing ROW does not cater to the codal provision of 25m ROW in rural stretches and 15m in built-up stretches. However, the project road widening shall be restricted within available existing ROW to avoid land acquisitions.

40. Bhatura – Bhadanpur – Barrakhud Road:- It starts from a junction on Maihar-Barhi Road (SH-11) at Bhadanpur and ends at Satna District broder (km 20+050) near Bhatura Village. The project road lies totally in Satna district. Its length is 20.05 Km. Existing carriageway width generally varies from 3.0m to 7.00m with about 0.50m to 1.50m earthen shoulder on either side. Vertical profile has been proposed keeping the formation level above the HFL as per codal provision. Deficient vertical curves have been smoothened out at the intersection of different grades to ease off the changes in gradients for the fast moving vehicles. Existing ROW was observed as per revenue map about 10m to 18m wide. However, the existing ROW does not cater to the codal provision of 25m ROW in rural stretches and 15m in built-up stretches. However, the project road widening shall be restricted within available existing ROW to avoid land acquisitions.

41. Parsona Mada Road:- It starts from at Km 18/4 of Bargawan – Waidhan Road (MDR) in Parsona Town & terminates at Makrohar - Dhangarh road in Mada village. The project road lies totally in Singrauli district. Its length is 24.39 Km. There are a number of intersections along the road. Some of these junctions are very important viz., T Junction at Km 0.0, intersecting MDR which is going towards Bargawan – Waidhan, junction at Km 24.39 intersecting road connecting to Makrohar - Dhangarh Road. Existing ROW was observed as per revenue map about 12m to 20m wide. Existing carriageway width generally varies from 3.50m to 10.50m with about 0.80m to 2.00m earthen shoulder on either side. The carriageway is much below the basic width requirement which is also confirmed from the Traffic Analysis.

42. Mada - Ramgarh Road:- It starts from Makrohar - Parsona Road in Mada Town & terminates at Karouti - Dhangarh road. The project road lies totally in Singrauli district. The length of the road is 19.87 Km. Existing carriageway width varies from 3.50 m to 3.75 m with about 1.30 m to 2.20 m earthen shoulder on either side. Existing ROW was observed as per revenue map about 12m to 15m wide. However, the existing ROW does not cater to the codal provision of 25m ROW in rural stretches and 15m in built-up stretches. However, the project road widening shall be restricted within available existing ROW to avoid land acquisitions. 18

43. Harphari-Khaira Road:- It starts at km 12/10 Karthua-Chitrangi Road (MP-MDR-46-01) in Harphari Village & terminates at Sihawal-Chitrangi road (MP-MDR-46-08) in Khaira village. The project road lies totally in Singrauli district. The length of the road is 25.990 Km. There are a number of intersections along the road. Some of these junctions are very important viz., T Junction at Km 0.0 intersecting MP-MDR-46-01 Road which is going towards Karthua – Chitrangi, junction at Km 23.00 intersecting MP-MDR-46-08 road connecting to Sihawal- Chitrangi Road. Existing ROW was observed as per revenue map about 10m to 15m wide. Existing carriageway width generally varies from 3.00 m to 3.75 m with 1.00 m earthen shoulder on either side. Detailed topographic survey reveals that horizontal alignment needs improvement at places particularly at river crossings and layouts within urban, semi urban & rural settlement areas. Deficient horizontal curves have been revised to ruling IRC standards for 65/80 Kmph speed on MDR.

44. Chitrangi Garhwa Road:- The Chitrangi Garhwa Road starts from Chitrangi & ternubates at km. 28.80 at Garhwa. Actual design length of the nonsample subproject road is 22.671 km. The existing alignment is a link between chitrangi. Lalmati village, Duara, Ghorha, Logahi, Mohgai and Badgada. The pattern on both side of road is agricultural and built up. The details of land use pattern along the road. Existing road is a single lane major district road with asphalt pavement. Carriageway varies from 3.0 m to 3.75 m along the entire stretch with earthen shoulder both sides and formation width varies from 5 to 7.30 and available ROW is 12 m. The pavement is in very poor condition. The condition of shoulders is also poor and now covered with vegaetaion. There is no formal drainage system along the road. Major traffic on this road is of passenger vehicles and average daily traffic on this road is of passenger vehicles and average daily traffic is 2033 PCUs.

45. Anuppur – Jaitpur Road:- It starts at Km 190/8 of NH-78 & terminates at Km 43+000 of MDR near Jaitpur Bus stand. The project road lies totally in Anuppur and Shahdol district. The length of the road is 36.66 Km. Existing carriageway width varies from 3.00m to 6.00m with about 1.00m to 2.00m earthen shoulder on either side. Existing ROW was observed as per revenue map about 10m to 20m wide. However, the existing ROW does not cater to the codal provision of 25m ROW in rural stretches and 15m in built-up stretches. However, the project road widening shall be restricted within available existing ROW to avoid land acquisitions.

46. Gohparu – Rashmohni - Budhar {via Bathiya} Road:- It starts at Km 159/8 of Shahdol- Anuppur (NH-78) in Budhar Town & terminates in Rashmohni. The project road lies totally in Shahdol district. The length of the road is 39.935 Km. Existing ROW was observed as per revenue map about 12m to 18m wide.

47. Pasghari Devri Janakpur Road:- It starts from Sidhi-Beohari Road (SH-55) in Pasgarhi village & terminates by Making Y Intersection with Beohari-Rewa Road (SH-9). The project road lies totally in Satna & Shahdol district. The length of the road is 23.485 Km. Existing carriageway width varies from 3.75m to 4.00m with about 1.00m earthen shoulder on either side. The carriageway is much below the basic width requirement which is also confirmed from the Traffic Analysis. Existing ROW was observed as per revenue map about 10m to 15m wide. However, the existing ROW does not cater to the codal provision of 25m ROW in rural stretches and 15m in built-up stretches. However, the project road widening shall be restricted within available existing ROW to avoid land acquisitions.

48. Jhurai to Sarai Road:- It starts from a T-intersection on NH-75E (Sidhi - Singrauli Road) near Jhurai village and ends at a T-Intersection on Sidhi - Waidhan Road about 4.0 km before Sarai Village. The length of the road is 31.440 Km. The project road traverses through Singrauli Districts of Madhya Pradesh. The existing ROW based on inventory Report varies from 12m to 19

25m and is generally concentric with the centre line of the existing road. Existing carriageway width is 3.75m with about 1.0m to 2.0m earthen shoulder on either side.

49. Sohagpur –Manpur:- It starts at Km 2/2 of Rewa - Shahdol (SH-9) near Sohagpur Town & terminates at Bandhavgarh - Jaisinghnagar Road in Manpur Town. The project road lies in Umaria & Shahdol district. The length of the road is 59.40 Km. Existing ROW was observed as per revenue map about 10m to 16m wide. Existing carriageway width is 3.75m with about 1.00m to 2.50m earthen shoulder on either side. Detailed topographic survey reveals that horizontal alignment needs improvement at places particularly at river crossings and layouts within urban, semi urban & rural settlement areas. Deficient horizontal curves have been revised to ruling IRC standards for 65/80 Kmph speed on MDR. Vertical profile has been proposed keeping the formation level above the HFL as per codal provision. Deficient vertical curves have been smoothened out at the intersection of different grades to ease off the changes in gradients for the fast moving vehicles.

50. Existing Features: The subproject roads are located in Rewa zone of Madhya Pradesh State covering seven districts namely Rewa, Satna, Sidhi, Singrauli, Shadol, Annuppur and Umaria. The total length of the subproject roads is about 362 km. The length of individual road sections varies from 20 km to 60 km. The proposed road sections are part of the major district road network on Madhya Pradesh. The existing road sections are mostly single lane district roads with carriageway width vary from 3.0 m to 7.0 m with earthen shoulders. Formation width varies from 5.0m to 9.0m. The sub project roads run through plain, rolling & hilly terrain and passing across several agricultural land, villages, and towns. The existing pavement is bituminous in most of the road section, but CC pavement can also be found in few sections. The overall riding quality is fair to poor. The condition of shoulders is also poor which are now mostly covered with vegetation. There is no formal drainage system along the roads. Major traffic on these roads is of passenger vehicles except in Bhatura-Bhadanpur road where the road carries large numbers of commercial vehicles of Kymore cement factory and in Persona-Mada road because of its location nearer to Singrauli industrial areas. The current average daily traffic on the sub project roads are relatively low and varying between 233 PCU to 1058 PCU, except in Bhatura-Bhadanpur road where the current average daily traffic is 2127 PCU. Conditions and landuse pattern along the selected subproject road alignments is given in Table 7.

Table 7: Existing conditions of Road Sections Length C/W Formation Pavement AADT MDR No. Road Section Terrain Land use (km) width (m) width (m) Condition (PCU/Day) MP-MDR-44- Kharamseda Kirhai Ramgarh Plain/ Rolling Built up/ Agriculture/ 34.35 3.00 -5.50 5.00 - 8.50 Fair - Poor 353 16 Road /Hilly Barren MP-MDR-44- Jharkua Raigaon Karsara 23.95 3.00 -5.00 5.00 - 8.00 Fair - Poor 581 Plain Built up/ Agriculture 19 Road MP-MDR-44- Bhatura Bhadpur Barrakhurd Poor- Plain/ Built up/ Agriculture/ 20.05 3.00 -7.00 4.80 - 8.00 2127 23 Road Very Poor Rolling/ Hilly Barren/ Forest MP-MDR-46- 6.00 - Good - Parsona Mada Road 24.39 3.50 -5.50 1034 Plain Built up/ Agriculture 03 13.00 Poor MP-MDR-46- 3.00 - Built up/ Agriculture/ Ramgarh Mada Road 19.87 6.10 -8.15 Fair - Poor 308 Plain/ Rolling 04 3.75 Forest MP-MDR-46- Harphari Khaira Misirgawan Plain/ Built up/ Agriculture/ 25.99 3.00 -3.75 5.00 - 5.75 Fair - Poor 233 08 via Shivpurva Road Rolling/ Hilly Forest MDR-46-02 Chitrangi-Garhwa 22.67 3.50 to 7 to 10 Fair to 1089 Agriculture/ Built up/ Agriculture/ Road 7.05 Poor Forest Forest MP-MDR-47- Built up/ Agriculture/ 02 & MP- Anuppur Jaitpur Road 36.66 3.00 -5.50 5.95 - 8.00 Fair - Poor 612 Plain Barren/ Forest MDR-49-04 MP-MDR-49- Gohparu Rasmohni Budhar Built up/ Agriculture/ 39.94 3.50 -3.75 5.50 - 6.75 Fair - Poor 936 Plain 08 (via Bathiya) Road Barren/ Forest MP-MDR-49- Built up/ Agriculture/ Pasgarhi Devri Janakpur Road 23.49 3.75 -4.00 3.75 - 6.00 Poor 1058 Plain/ Rolling 07 Forest Poor - Plain/ Built up/ Agriculture/ Jhurai – Sarai Road 31.44 3.75 5.75 - 7.75 458 Very Poor Rolling/ Hilly Barren/ Forest MP-MDR-46- 3.00 - Built up/ Agriculture/ Sohagpur – Manpur Road 59.40 5.75 - 9.95 Fair - Poor 394 Plain 04 7.00 Barren/ Forest

C. Engineering Surveys and Investigations

51. Following surveys and investigations had been carried out on the subproject roads for collection of data for incorporation in the DPR and evolve the design for improvement and upgradation: • topographic surveys; • traffic surveys; • road and pavement condition survey and inventory; • culverts and bridges condition survey and inventories; • material surveys; • hydrology studies for new bridge structures; • Geotechnical investigations & subsoil exploration for structures; and • existing utilities surveys.

52. These surveys had been carried out in accordance with the guidelines in IRC:SP:19 to fulfill requirement in the TOR.

D. Current and Projected Daily Traffic

53. Traffic survey stations were selected on all 12 subproject roads after detailed reconnaissance survey and in line with the TOR. All traffic surveys were carried out as per IRC Guidelines given in IRC: SP 19-2001, IRC: 108-1996, IRC SP: 41-1994, IRC: 102-1998, IRC 103- 1988 Pedestrian Facilities and IRC: 09-1972.

E. Proposed Improvement

54. The Project Roads will receive the following upgrades under the project: a) Realignment b) Junction Improvement c) Design of Road side Drain d) Project facilities e) Proposed Crust/Pavement design- New Construction/Strengthening f) Landscaping g) CD Structures h) Additional Provision related to Safety i) Improvement of Horizontal and Vertical Geometry j) Traffic signage/pavement marking k) Improvement Proposal for Bridges and Culverts l) Road Embankment.

1. Alignment and Geometry

55. The most of the length of subproject roads runs through plain to rolling terrain cutting across several agricultural land, villages, and towns with a number of sub-standard curves. These curves will be improved following standards to the extent possible within the available ROW and maximizing the use of existing pavement in rural stretches. Vertical alignment has been designed to correct the existing road conditions in compliance to road standards.

2. Proposed ROW

56. The available RoW is largely 22m in rural stretches and about 12 m in built-up areaswhich are more than adequate to accommodate the proposed road upgrading. Proposed improvements will be restricted to the available ROW.

3. Cross Sectional Details

57. The proposed road will have intermediate lane standard carriageway having standards width of 5.5m and paved shoulder of 2.5m width on both sides (except in Bhatura-Bhadanpur road where 2-lane has been proposed i.e 7.0m C/W with 2.0m hard shoulder both side). No median is provided for the project road. In built-up stretches where considerable commercial activity is present, a 1.0 m wide footpathwill be constructed on both sides of the road under which side drain will be accommodated.Minimum width of utility corridor will be 2.0 m. The provision of retaining wall is made at critical locations to avoid the requirement of ROW. The typical cross sections (TCS) in built-up area, rural areas, overlay locations are shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3: Typical Cross Sections

Kharamseda Kirhai Ramgarh Road

PROPOSED ROADWAY 10.00

VARIOUS UP TO PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO 0.95 0.50 VARIES 2.25M 5.50 2.25M VARIES 0.50 0.95 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN C HARD SHOULDER L HARD SHOULDER

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY Varies from 3.50 to 3.75 M

3% 2% 2% 3%

2H : 1V EXISTING EXISTING 2H : 1V EMBANKMENT EMBANKMENT GL EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 0.95 GL

HARD SHOULDER 260 mm PQC 0.60 IN MINIMUM CBR >12% 100 mm DLC 500 MM SUBGRADE ( CBR > 8%) 0.45 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER) UTILISE EXCAVATED STUFF OR EMBANKMENT WITH CBR > 5% IF REQUIRED TCS-I RIGID PAVEMENT FOR OPEN/RURAL AREA

PROPOSED ROADWAY 12.00 PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO VARIOUS UP TO 0.60 2.50m VARIOUS UP TO 7.00 m WIDTH WITHIN ROW 2.50m 0.60 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN C SHOULDER L SHOULDER

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 3.75 M

3% BUILDINGLINE BUILDINGLINE EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY CC Paver Block 260 mm PQC 100 mm DLC FILLING IN CBR >12% 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER) SUBGRADE ( CBR > 8%) TCS-II RIGID PAVEMENT FOR BUILT-UP AREA

PROPOSED ROADWAY 8.50 PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO VARIOUS UP TO 0.60 1.50 m VARIOUS UP TO 3.75 - 5.50 m WIDTH WITHIN ROW 1.50 m 0.60 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN C Paver Block L Paver Block

3.75-5.50 EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 30 mm BC

3% 3%

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY Existing CC Pavment BUILDINGLINE BUILDINGLINE 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER) CC Paver Block TCS-III OVERLAY ON EXISTING RIGID PAVEMENT FOR BUILT-UP AREA

Jharkua Raigaon Karsara Road

PROPOSED ROADWAY ROAD-11 : JHURAI - SARAI 10.00

VARIOUS UP TO PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO 0.95 0.50 VARIES 2.25m VARIOUS UP TO 3.75 - 5.50 m WIDTH WITHIN ROW 2.25m VARIES 0.50 0.95 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN C HARD SHOULDER L HARD SHOULDER

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY Varies from 3.00 to 3.75 M

2% 2% 3% 3%

2H : 1V EXISTING EXISTING 2H : 1V EMBANKMENT EMBANKMENT GL EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 0.95 GL

HARD SHOULDER 0.60 IN MINIMUM CBR >12% 260 mm PQC 500 MM SUBGRADE ( CBR > 8%) 100 mm DLC 0.45 UTILISE EXCAVATED STUFF OR 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER) EMBANKMENT WITH CBR > 5% IF REQUIRED

TCS-I RIGID PAVEMENT FOR OPEN/RURAL AREA

Bhatura Bhadpur Barrakhurd Road

ROAD-08 : BHADANPUR - BHATURA

PROPOSED ROADWAY 12.00

VARIOUS UP TO PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO 0.95 0.50 VARIES 2.50 7.00 2.50 VARIES 0.50 0.95 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN C HARD SHOULDER L HARD SHOULDER

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY Varies from 3.00 to 5.50 M

2% 2% 3% 3%

2H : 1V EXISTING EXISTING 2H : 1V EMBANKMENT EMBANKMENT GL EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 0.95 GL

HARD SHOULDER 300 mm PQC 0.60 IN MINIMUM CBR >12% 100 mm DLC 0.45 500 MM SUBGRADE ( CBR > 5%) 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER) UTILISE EXCAVATED STUFF OR EMBANKMENT WITH CBR > 5% IF REQUIRED

TCS-I RIGID PAVEMENT FOR OPEN/RURAL AREA

PROPOSED ROADWAY 12.00

VARIOUS UP TO PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO 0.60 2.50 7.00 2.50 0.60 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN SHOULDER SHOULDER CL

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY Varies from 3.00 to 5.50 M

2% 2%

3% BUILDING LINE BUILDING EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY LINE BUILDING CC Paver Block 300 mm PQC 100 mm DLC FILLING IN CBR >12% 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER) SUBGRADE ( CBR > 7%)

TCS-II RIGID PAVEMENT FOR BUILT-UP AREA

Parsona Mada Road

ROAD-05 : PARSONA MADA ROAD PROPOSED ROADWAY 12.00 PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO VARIOUS UP TO 0.60 1.10 m 9.80 1.10 m 0.60 WIDTH WITHIN ROW WIDTH WITHIN ROWDRAIN C DRAIN Paver Block L Paver Block

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 9.00 30 mm BC

3% 3%

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY

SUBGRADE ( CBR > 8%)

BUILDING LINE BUILDING LINE 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER) Existing Rigid Pavment CC Paver Block TCS-I OVERLAY ON EXISTING RIGID PAVEMENT FOR BUILT-UP AREA

PROPOSED ROADWAY 10.00

VARIOUS UP TO PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO 0.95 0.50 VARIES 2.25 m 5.50 2.25 m VARIES 0.50 0.95 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN C HARD SHOULDER L HARD SHOULDER

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 5.50 M

30 mm BC

3% 2.5% 2.5% 3%

2H : 1V 2H : 1V EXISTING EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY EXISTING 0.95 GL EMBANKMENT EMBANKMENT GL

Existing Flexible Pavment 0.60 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER) HARD SHOULDER 0.45 IN MINIMUM CBR >12% 500 MM SUBGRADE ( CBR > 8%) TCS-II OVERLAY ON EXISTING FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT FOR BUILT-UP AREA

PROPOSED ROADWAY ROAD-05 : PARSONA - MADA 12.00

VARIOUS UP TO PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO 0.60 2.50 m VARIOUS UP TO 7.00 m WIDTH WITHIN ROW 2.50 m 0.60 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN C SHOULDER L SHOULDER

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 3.00 M

2% 2%

3% 3% BUILDING LINE EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY BUILDING LINE 280 mm PQC CC Paver Block 100 mm DLC FILLING IN CBR >12% 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER) SUBGRADE ( CBR > 8%) TCS-III RIGID PAVEMENT FOR BUILT-UP AREA

PROPOSED ROADWAY 10.00

VARIOUS UP TO PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO 0.95 0.50 VARIES 2.25 m 5.50 2.25 m VARIES 0.50 0.95 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN C HARD SHOULDER L HARD SHOULDER

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 3.00 M

2% 2% 3% 3%

2H : 1V EXISTING EXISTING 2H : 1V EMBANKMENT EMBANKMENT GL EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 0.95 GL

HARD SHOULDER 280 mm PQC 0.60 IN MINIMUM CBR >12% 100 mm DLC 0.45 500 MM SUBGRADE ( CBR > 8%) 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER) UTILISE EXCAVATED STUFF OR EMBANKMENT WITH CBR > 5% IF REQUIRED TCS-IV RIGID PAVEMENT FOR OPEN/RURAL AREA

Ramgarh Mada Road

ROAD-06 : MADA RAMGARH ROAD PROPOSED ROADWAY 10.00

VARIOUS UP TO PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO 0.95 0.50 VARIES 2.25M 5.50 2.25M VARIES 0.50 0.95 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN C HARD SHOULDER L HARD SHOULDER

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY Varies from 3.00 to 3.75 M

2% 2% 3% 3%

2H : 1V EXISTING EXISTING 2H : 1V EMBANKMENT EMBANKMENT GL EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 0.95 GL

HARD SHOULDER 0.60 IN MINIMUM CBR >12% 260 mm PQC 0.45 500 MM SUBGRADE ( CBR > 8%) 100 mm DLC UTILISE EXCAVATED STUFF OR 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER) EMBANKMENT WITH CBR > 5% IF REQUIRED TCS-I RIGID PAVEMENT FOR OPEN/RURAL AREA

PROPOSED ROADWAY 12.00 PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO VARIOUS UP TO 0.60 2.50M VARIOUS UP TO 7.00 m WIDTH WITHIN ROW 2.50M 0.60 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN C SHOULDER L SHOULDER

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 3.75 M

2% 2%

3% 3% BUILDINGLINE BUILDINGLINE EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY

CC Paver Block 260 mm PQC FILLING IN CBR >12% 100 mm DLC SUBGRADE ( CBR > 8%) 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER)

TCS-II RIGID PAVEMENT FOR BUILT-UP AREA

Harphari Khaira Misirgawan via Shivpurva Road

ROAD-07 : HARPHARI KHAIRA PROPOSED ROADWAY MISIRGAWAN VIA SHIVPURVA ROAD 10.00 VARIOUS UP TO PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO 0.95 0.50 VARIES 2.25m 5.50 2.25m VARIES 0.50 0.95 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN C HARD SHOULDER L HARD SHOULDER

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY Varies from 3.00 to 3.75 M

2% 2% 3% 3%

2H : 1V EXISTING EXISTING 2H : 1V EMBANKMENT EMBANKMENT GL EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 0.95 GL

HARD SHOULDER 0.60 IN MINIMUM CBR >12% 260 mm PQC 500 MM SUBGRADE ( CBR > 8%) 100 mm DLC 0.45 UTILISE EXCAVATED STUFF OR 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER) EMBANKMENT WITH CBR > 5% IF REQUIRED TCS-I RIGID PAVEMENT FOR OPEN/RURAL AREA

PROPOSED ROADWAY 10.00

VARIOUS UP TO PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO 0.60 1.50m VARIOUS UP TO 7.00 m WIDTH WITHIN ROW 1.50m 0.60 WIDTH WITHIN ROW WIDTH WITHIN ROW C DRAIN SHOULDER L SHOULDER DRAIN EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY Varies from 3.00 to 3.75 M

3% 2% 2% 3% BUILDINGLINE EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY BUILDINGLINE

CC Paver Block 260 mm PQC FILLING IN CBR >12% 100 mm DLC SUBGRADE ( CBR > 8%) 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER)

TCS-II RIGID PAVEMENT FOR BUILT-UP AREA

Chitrangi-Garhwa Road

Anuppur Jaitpur Road

ROAD-16&21 : ANUPPUR - JAITPUR PROPOSED ROADWAY 10.00

VARIOUS UP TO PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO 0.95 0.50 VARIES 2.25 5.50 2.25 VARIES 0.50 0.95 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN HARD SHOULDER CL HARD SHOULDER

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY Varies from 3.00 to 3.75 M

3% 2.5% 2.5% 3%

2H : 1V 2H : 1V EXISTING EXISTING EMBANKMENT EMBANKMENT GL EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 0.95 GL

HARD SHOULDER 30 mm BC 0.60 IN MINIMUM CBR >12% 50 mm DBM 125 mm WMM 500 MM SUBGRADE ( CBR > 5%) 0.45 125 mm WMM UTILISE EXCAVATED STUFF OR 150 mm GSB EMBANKMENT WITH CBR > 5% 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER) IF REQUIRED TCS-I FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT FOR OPEN/RURAL AREA

PROPOSED ROADWAY 12.00

VARIOUS UP TO PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO 0.60 2.50 7.00 2.50 0.60 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN SHOULDER CL SHOULDER

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY Varies from 3.75 to 5.50 M

3% 2% 2% 3% BUILDING LINE BUILDING LINE EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY CC Paver Block 300 mm PQC FILLING IN CBR >12% 150 mm DLC SUBGRADE ( CBR > 5%) 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER)

TCS-II RIGID PAVEMENT FOR BUILT-UP AREA

Gohparu Rasmohni Budhar (via Bathiya) Road

ROAD-22 : GOHPARU RASHMOHNI BUDHAR (VIA BATHIYA) PROPOSED ROADWAY 10.00

VARIOUS UP TO PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO 0.95 0.50 VARIES 2.25 5.50 2.25 VARIES 0.50 0.95 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN C HARD SHOULDER L HARD SHOULDER

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY Varies from 3.00 to 3.75 M

3% 2% 2% 3%

2H : 1V 2H : 1V EXISTING EXISTING EMBANKMENT EMBANKMENT GL EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 0.95 GL

HARD SHOULDER 270 mm PQC 0.60 IN MINIMUM CBR >12% 100 mm DLC 0.45 500 MM SUBGRADE ( CBR > 8%) 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER) UTILISE EXCAVATED STUFF OR EMBANKMENT WITH CBR > 5% IF REQUIRED TCS-I RIGID PAVEMENT FOR OPEN/RURAL AREA

PROPOSED ROADWAY 12.00

VARIOUS UP TO PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO 0.60 2.50 7.00 2.50 0.60 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN C HARD SHOULDER L HARD SHOULDER

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 3.75 M

3% 2% 3% BUILDING LINE BUILDING BUILDING LINE BUILDING EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY

CC Paver Block 270 mm PQC 100 mm DLC FILLING IN CBR >12% 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER) SUBGRADE ( CBR > 8%)

TCS-II RIGID PAVEMENT FOR BUILT-UP AREA

Pasgarhi Devri Janakpur Road

ROAD-24 : PASGARHI - BUDWA- UPTO SH-9 ROAD PROPOSED ROADWAY 10.00

VARIOUS UP TO PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO 0.95 0.50 VARIES 2.25 5.50 2.25 VARIES 0.50 0.95 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN C WIDTH WITHIN ROW HARD SHOULDER L HARD SHOULDER

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY Varies from 3.00 to 3.75 M

2% 2% 3% 3%

2H : 1V EXISTING EXISTING 2H : 1V EMBANKMENT EMBANKMENT GL EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 0.95 GL HARD SHOULDER IN MINIMUM CBR >12% 280 mm PQC 0.60 500 MM SUBGRADE ( CBR > 8%) 100 mm DLC 0.45 UTILISE EXCAVATED STUFF OR 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER) EMBANKMENT WITH CBR > 5% IF REQUIRED TCS-I FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT FOR OPEN/RURAL AREA

PROPOSED ROADWAY 10.00

VARIOUS UP TO PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO 0.60 1.50 7.00 1.50 0.60 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW C SHOULDER L SHOULDER

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY Varies from 3.00 to 3.75 M

3% 2% 2% 3%

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY

BUILDING LINE BUILDING LINE

CC Paver Block 280 mm PQC FILLING IN CBR >12% 100 mm DLC 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER) SUBGRADE ( CBR > 8%) TCS-II RIGID PAVEMENT FOR BUILT-UP AREA

PROPOSED ROADWAY 10.00

VARIOUS UP TO PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO 0.95 0.50 VARIES 2.25 5.50 2.25 VARIES 0.50 0.95 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN C HARD SHOULDER L HARD SHOULDER

2% 2% 3% 3%

2H : 1V 2H : 1V GL 0.95 GL

Jhurai – Sarai Road

PROPOSED ROADWAY ROAD-11 : JHURAI - SARAI 10.00

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY Varies from 3.00 to 3.75 M

2% 2% 3% 3%

2H : 1V EXISTING EXISTING 2H : 1V EMBANKMENT EMBANKMENT GL EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 0.95 GL

HARD SHOULDER 0.60 IN MINIMUM CBR >12% 260 mm PQC 500 MM SUBGRADE ( CBR > 8%) 100 mm DLC 0.45 UTILISE EXCAVATED STUFF OR 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER) EMBANKMENT WITH CBR > 5% IF REQUIRED

TCS-I RIGID PAVEMENT FOR OPEN/RURAL AREA

Sohagpur – Manpur Road

ROAD-12 : SOHAGPUR - MANPUR PROPOSED ROADWAY 10.00

VARIOUS UP TO PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO 0.95 0.50 VARIES 2.25 5.50 2.25 VARIES 0.50 0.95 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW C HARD SHOULDER L HARD SHOULDER EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 3.75 M 2% 2% 3% 3%

2H : 1V EXISTING EXISTING 2H : 1V EMBANKMENT EMBANKMENT GL EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 0.95 GL

HARD SHOULDER 0.60 IN MINIMUM CBR >12% 270 mm PQC 500 MM SUBGRADE ( CBR > 8%) 100 mm DLC 0.45 UTILISE EXCAVATED STUFF OR 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER) EMBANKMENT WITH CBR > 5% IF REQUIRED TCS-I RIGID PAVEMENT FOR OPEN/RURAL AREA

PROPOSED ROADWAY 10.00

VARIOUS UP TO PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO 0.60 1.50 7.00 1.50 0.60 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN CL SHOULDER EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY SHOULDER 3.75 M

2% 2%

3% 3% BUILDING LINE BUILDING LINE CC Paver Block EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 270 mm PQC FILLING IN CBR >12% 100 mm DLC SUBGRADE ( CBR > 8%) 150 mm GSB ( DRAINAGE LAYER)

TCS-II RIGID PAVEMENT FOR BUILT-UP AREA

PROPOSED ROADWAY 10.00

VARIOUS UP TO PROPOSED CARRIAGEWAY VARIOUS UP TO 0.95 0.50 VARIES 2.25 5.50 2.25 VARIES 0.50 0.95 DRAIN WIDTH WITHIN ROW WIDTH WITHIN ROW DRAIN CL HARD SHOULDER HARD SHOULDER EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY 3.75 M 2% 2% 3% 3%

2H : 1V EXISTING EXISTING 2H : 1V EMBANKMENT EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY EMBANKMENT GL 0.95 GL

4. Widening Scheme

58. The proposed subproject roads widening is largely proposed to be concentric. However, widening is made on the right or left side of the road alignment depending on the availability of land and location of any religious and other socially sensitive structures. The proposed reconstruction is either overlaying from minimum sub-grade level after dismantling the existing blacktop.

5. Pavement Design

59. The general design procedure is based on the prevalent practices in the country. The design of pavement structure has been carried out as per IRC Guide lines and TOR. The detailed design of new pavement and overlays on existing pavement shall be based primarily on IRC-37:2012 and IRC-81: 1997 for flexible pavement and IRC-58: 2011 for rigid pavement. General pavement composition include i) thickness in BM (12mm), ii) thickness in term of BC/DBM (230mm), Overlay portion (BC-50mm and DBM (225mm).

6. Junctions Design

60. All existing junctions (major and minor) throughout the project roads will beimproved to have paved carriageway under the Project. Major and minor junction improvements are kept at grade as per the standardspecification (IRC SP:41:1994 - Guidelines on Design of At-Grade Intersections in Rural and Urban Roads).

7. Improvement of Bridges

61. There are no major bridges in the project roads. Some of the minor bridges which are in poor conditions will be reconstructed/rehabilitated under the project. Improvement proposals for all bridges have been prepared in keeping the view of hydraulic analysis as per IRC: SP: 13- 2004. Other drainage arrangement for CD Structures shall be as per Clause no. 116 of IRC: 05- 1990.

8. Culverts

62. There are many culverts on project roads. Some of them will be reconstructed and additional new Hume pipes and slab culverts will be installed to balance water flows. Improvement proposals for all CD Structures have been prepared in keeping the view of hydraulic analysis as per IRC: SP: 13-2004. Other drainage arrangement for CD Structures shall be as per Clause no. 116 of IRC: 05-1990.

9. Roadside Drainage

63. Based on the hydraulic study and site conditions unlined drains are proposed in the rural section, RCC rectangular drains are proposed in the built-up section, and hut drains areproposed in the high embankment section.

10. Road Furniture and other Features

64. The road furniture, traffic safety features and other facilities included in the design are as given below:

 Road Markings: Road markings perform the important function of guiding and controlling traffic on a highway. The markings serve as psychological barriers and signify the delineation of traffic paths and their lateral clearance from traffic hazards for safe movement of traffic. Road markings are thereforeessential to ensure smooth and orderly flow of traffic and to promote road safety. The Code of Practice for Road Markings, IRC: 35-1997 has been used in the study as the design basis. The location and type of marking lines, material and colour is followed using IRC: 35-1997 – “Code of Practice for Road Markings”. The road markings were carefully planned on carriageways, intersections and bridge locations.  Cautionary, Mandatory and Informatory Signs: Cautionary, mandatoryand informatory signs have been provided depending on the situation and function they perform in accordance with the IRC: 67-2001 guidelines for RoadSigns.  Crash Barrier: Metal Beam Crash Barrier is proposed at locations where theembankment height is more than 3.0m, at horizontal curves of radius less than161m and also at major bridge approaches.  Road Humps and Rumble Strips: The Road Humps are formed by providingrounded hump of 3.7m width (17m radius) and 0.10m height for the preferredadvisory crossing speed of 25 kmph for general traffic as per the IRC: 99–1988 guidelines. The basic material for construction is bituminous concreteformed to required shape. Road humps are located at T-intersections (and cross road intersections) on minor roads or perpendicular arms about 25 maway from the inner edge of the carriageway. Proper signs boards andmarkings are provided to advise the drivers in advance of the situation. Road humps are extended across carriageway up to the edge of paved shoulder.Rumble Strips are formed by a sequence of transverse strips laid across acarriageway. Maximum permitted height of 15mm, provided no vertical faceexceeds 6mm. These rumble device produce audible and vibratory effects to alert drivers to take greater care and do not normally reduce traffic speeds inthemselves. Proper signboards and marking are proposed to advise thedrivers in advance of the situation.

11. Borrow and Quarry Materials Sourcing

65. Potential sources of earth for the construction of embankment and subgrade have beenidentified immediately along the DBH Road. The borrow earth, sand, and quarry materials willbe sourced locally within a distance of about 25-30 Km from the road. (Guidelines for BorrowArea Management are given in Appendix 10).

12. Water for Construction

66. Water for construction of the project road will be taken from ground water and surfacewater sources after obtaining necessary permissions. No public water sources will be used forroad construction.

F. Construction Camps

67. One construction camp will be set up by the contractor at a suitable location along theproject corridors of each road sections which in consultation with the Project Director and M. P. State Pollution Control Board. 31

G. Project Cost

68. Cost estimates were prepared by a set of technical consultants recruited by MPRDC for preparing detailed project reports, and reviewed by MPRDC staff. The basic cost data for the project is based in a “Schedule of Rates for Roads and Bridges” published periodically by the Government of Madhya Pradesh, from Nov-2014. This has been escalated to Dec-2015 by adding an escalation factor that is derived from the ongoing awarded bids, and is estimated to be 8%. During implementation, the updated “Schedule of Rates” (if any), along with the then current normalized bid rates will be updated by MPRDC on an annual basis, and used for assessing project estimates and bid responses.

69. The cost of civil works including maintenance amounts to about US$ 393 million covering about 1280 km road length. The maintenance component is based on an average 3% of total cost of Civil Works for 5 years.

H. Construction Packaging and Implementation Schedule

70. It is proposed to carry out construction of the subprojects road sections under five construction package with a time period of 18-24 months. The subproject is proposed to be undertaken through International Competitive Bidding (ICB). Currently the subproject is at bidding stage and scheduled to award contract in the first quarter of 2017. The subproject is expected to complete in last quarter of 2018.

71. The following key factors in Construction Contract Packaging are considered in making the recommendation on Contract Packaging:  Logical sections for construction, worksite access and earthwork balance  Administrative jurisdiction and administrative efficiency  Size of contract to attract medium and large size contractors with the required equipment and capability  Time to completion  Environmental requirements and constraints to specific segments.

I. Project Benefits

72. The implementation of various project items is envisaged to have the following direct benefits:  better connectivity to key locations within State;  smooth flow of traffic on State and National Highway Network;  improved quality of life for the rural population in the project influence: this as a result of better access to markets, health, education and other facilities; and the derived stimulus for local economic activity;  a more efficient and safe road transport system: through reduced travel times, reduced road accidents, reduced vehicle operating and maintenance costs and reduced transportation costs for goods;  the facilitation of tourism.

IV. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT

A. Introduction

73. In order to assess the impacts of the proposed improvement to the subproject road, field visits were undertaken by the Consultants to understand environmental profile of the project influence area. This involved field inspections at all the sensitive locations, collection of secondary information for all the environmental components and discussions with the officials, NGO’s and local populace. The profile presented below comprises of the following:

 Physical environmental components such as meteorology, geology, topography, soil characteristics, air quality, surface and sub-surface water quality;  Biological environmental components such as aquatic, biotic and marine flora, fauna and mammals, and  Land environment in terms of land use, soil composition.

B. Physical Environment

74. Information of various physical parameters was collected from the Indian Meteorological Department, Statistical Department, Gazetteer of Madhya Pradesh, Forest Department, Department of Environment and other concern Government Departments and discussions with the officials from these agencies.

1. Meteorological Conditions

75. The State experience typical tropical climate. It is characterized by hot summer season and general dryness except in the southwest monsoon season. The year may be divided into four seasons. The cold season from December to February is followed by the hot season from March to about the middle of June. The period from mid-June to September is the southwest monsoon season. October and November constitute the post monsoon or retreating monsoon season. The maximum temperature during summers ranges from 32ºC to 40ºC while minimum temperature from 30ºC to 19ºC. The Temperature during the winter season ranges between of 27ºC to 10ºC. The monsoon season spreads from the month of June to September with average rainfall of 1343 mm in the west to 2000 mm in the eastern part of state. The mean annual rainfall in the state is 1200 mm.

76. The salient climatic features of the state are as follows: Average Annual Rainfall - 1200 mm Concentration of precipitation - June to September Humidity - 25 to 75 % Cloudiness - Heavily clouded in monsoon Wind - Generally light Mean Temperature - Summer 290C Winter 90C

77. The climatic conditions of the subproject areas (districts wise) is summarised in subsequent paragraphs.

78. Satna District: The climate of Satna district is characterized by intensely hot dry summer and well distributed rainfall, in south-west monsoon season and winter. Lowest low 33

temperature is expected at the beginning of the year and slowly increases and peaks in May reaching 410C and gradually tapers off to 310C in August and slightly increase by 2 degrees in October before continuing its cooling trend. The mean daily maximum temperature varies from 27.30C to 420C, while the mean daily minimum temperature varies from 13.20C to 28.30C. Relative humidity is highest during July to September months (85 to 87% at 8:30 hr and 76 to 78% at 17:30 hr.) and lowest during April and May months (39% at 8:30 hr and 23% at 17:30 hr.). On an average the district receives 1289 mm of rainfall annually mainly from south-east monsoon. The region is classified as heavy rainfall area. Normally rains start in June and continue up to October. Nearly 94.5 % of annual rainfall is received during June to September. About 2.3% of the normal rainfall is received during the winter season. On an average, there are about 62.3 rainy days in a year.

79. Singrauli District: It has a humid subtropical climate, with cold, misty winters, a hot summer and a humid monsoon season. Summers start in late March and go on till mid June, the average temperature being around 30 0C, with the peak of summer in May, when the highs regularly exceed 40 0C. The monsoon starts in late June and ends in late September. These months see about 860 mm of precipitation. The average temperature is around 25 0C and the humidity is quite high. Temperatures rise again up to late October when winter starts, which lasts up to early March. Winters in Singrauli are cold and misty with average temperatures around 15 0C and little rain. The winter peaks in January when temperatures may drop close to freezing on some nights. The total annual rainfall is about 980 mm.

80. Umaria District:- The Climate of this district is characterized by a hot summer and general dryness, except during southwest monsoon season. The year may be divided into four seasons. The cold season, December to February is followed by the hot season from March to about the middle of June. The period from the middle June to September is the southwest monsoon season. October and November from the post monsoon or transition period. There is only one IMD meteorological observatory located at district headquarters Umaria. Meteorological data of this observatory has been used for analysis. The average annual rainfall of Umaria district is about 1248.8 mm. The maximum rainfall takes place during the south-west monsoon period i.e. from June to September. The August month is the wettest month of the year and about 30% of the annual rainfall takes place only during this month. During winter & summer season about 10% & 3% of respectively rainfall takes place. From October to May, only 13% of the annual rainfall takes place.

81. Rewa District:- The climate of Rewa District, M.P, characterized by a hot summer and general dryness except during the south west monsoon season. The year may divide into four seasons. The cold season, December to February is followed by the hot season from March to about the middle or June. The period from [he middle of June to September is the south west monsoon season. October and November form the post monsoon or transition period. The normal annual rainfall of Rewa District is 1141.5 mm. Rewa District received maximum rainfall during south west monsoon period i.e. June to September. About 89.2% annual rainfall received during monsoon season. Only 10.8% of the annual rainfall takes place between Octobers to May period. Thus surplus water for ground water recharge is available only during the south west monsoon period. The normal maximum temperature received during the month of May is 41.30C and minimum during the month or January 7.90C. The normal annual means maximum and minimum temperature of Rewa District is 31.80C & 18.40C respectively, during the south west monsoon season the relative humidity generally exceeds 83% (August month). In the rest of the year is drier. The driest part of the year is the summer season. When relative humidity generally exceeds 8.3% (August month). In the rest or the year is drier. The driest part

or the year is the summer season, when relative humidity is less 37%. Normal climatological parameter for Rewa District

82. Anuppur District:- For description of meteorological parameters , data of nearest I.M.D. Observatory located at Umaria has been used. The normal annual rainfall of the district is 1235.0 mm. The district receives maximum rainfall during south-west monsoon period from June to September. About 89.3 % of annual rainfall is received during monsoon season. Only 10.7 % of the annual rainfall occurs during no monsoon period, from October to May. Thus maximum water available for ground water recharge is during south-west monsoon season. The normal maximum temperature recorded during the month of May is 41.3º C, and minimum during the month of December is 8.4º C. The normal annual means maximum and minimum temperatures of Anuppur district are 31.6º C and 18.2º C respectively. During the south-west monsoon, the relative humidity generally exceeds 88 % during month of August. Relative humidity decreases during non-monsoon season. In summer season, relative humidity is less than 38 %. May is the driest month of the year. The wind velocity in the area is higher, during pre-monsoon period as compared to post monsoon season. The maximum wind velocity 6.8 Km/hr. is observed during the month of June and minimum 2.3 Km/hr is recorded during month of November. The average normal annual wind velocity of Anuppur district is 4.3 Km/hr. The climate of Anuppur district is characterized by a hot summer and general dryness during the south-west monsoon season. The year may be divided into four seasons. The cold season is December to February and followed by the hot season from March to about the middle of June. The period from middle of June to September is the south-west monsoon season. October and November form the post-monsoon or transition period.

83. Sidhi District:- The climate of Sidhi district is characterized by a hot summer and general dryness except during the south west monsoon season. The year may divide into four seasons. The cool season, December to February is followed by the hot season from March to about the middle of June. The period from the middle of June to September is the south west monsoon season. October and November form the post monsoon or transition period. The normal annual rainfall of Sidhi district is 1132.7 mm. Sidhi district received maximum rainfall received during south west monsoon period i.e. June to September. About 89.7% of the annual rainfall received during monsoon season. Only 10.9% of the annual rainfall takes place between Octobers to May period. Thus surplus water for ground water recharge is available only during the south west monsoon period. The normal maximum temperature received during the month of May is 420C and minimum during the month of January is 8.10C. The normal annual means maximum and minimum temperature of Sidhi district is 32.50C & 18.60C respectively. During the south west monsoon season the relative humidity generally exceeds 85% (August month). In the rest of the year is direr. The driest part of the year is the summer season, when relative humidity's are less 35%. May is the driest month of the year. The wind velocity is higher during the pre-monsoon period as compared to post monsoon period. The maximum wind velocity is 6.5 km/hr. observed during the month of June and minimum 1.6 km/hr. during the month of November. The average normal annual wind velocity of Sidhi district is 3.6 km/hr.

84. Table 9 present key climatic features of the four districts through in which project roads are located.

Table 8: Summary of Climatic Condition of Project Districts District Satna Sidhi & Shadol Umaria Singrauli Anuppur Rewa warm sub- warm sub- warm sub- Humid sub- Climate Moderated Moderated tropical tropical tropical tropical Maximum temperature 470c 460c 46.20c 40.90c 46°C 40° C 35

District Satna Sidhi & Shadol Umaria Singrauli Anuppur Rewa Minimum temperature 20c -100c -0.10c 8.70c 8.4°C 15° C Average Rainfall 1100 mm 1131.5 mm 1093 mm 1014 mm 1235 mm 1128 mm Source: IMD Data

2. Topography, Land Use, Geology and Soils

85. Madhya Pradesh the second largest state of the country has a geographic area of 30.82 million hectare, which constitutes 9.37% of the land area of the country. “Madhya Pradesh” by virtue of its geographical location can be termed as “Heart of India”. The subproject road areas lies between latitude 21053' North and longitude 76047' and 78044’ East.

86. The life line of State is river “Narmada” which runs from East to West between Vindhya & Satpura ranges the flanks of which are formed by North and South of India. Madhya Pradesh is surrounded by Gujarat in the West, Rajasthan in the North-West, Uttar Pradesh in the North- East, Chattisgarh in the East and Maharashtra in the South. Landlocked in the central part of the country, Madhya Pradesh has a topography that is crossed from north to south by plains separated by upland areas.

87. The topography of the subproject areas is mixed type. The terrain in most of the subproject roads is flat with some sections also passing through rolling to hilly terrain. The existing land use along the project road sections is mostly agricultural mixed with roadside development in plain terrain and vegetative and forested on hilly terrain Land use is predominantly agriculture except three subproject road section where as land use is predominantly forests followed by open areas and residential areas. Table 10 present the geography and land use along the selected subproject roads.

Table 9: Topography and Land Use along the Subproject Road Sections Length Sl.No Name of Road Terrain Land use (km) Kharamseda Kirhai Ramgarh 1 34.35 Plain/Rolling/Hilly Built/Agriculture/Barren Road Jharkua Raigaon Karsara 2 23.95 Plain Built up/Agriculture Road Bhatura Bhadpur Barrakhurd Built up/ Agriculture/ Barren/ 3 20.05 Plain/Rolling/Hilly Road Forest 4 Parsona Mada Road 24.39 Plain Built up/ Agriculture 5 Ramgarh Mada Road 19.87 Plain/Rolling Built up/ Agriculture/ Forest Harphari Khaira Misirgawan 6 25.99 Plain/Rolling/Hilly Built up/ Agriculture/ Forest via Shivpurva Road 7 Chitrangi-Garhwa Road 22.67 Plain Built up/ Agriculture/ Forest Built up/ Agriculture/ Barren/ 8 Anuppur Jaitpur Road 36.66 Plain Forest Gohparu Rasmohni Budhar Built up /Agriculture/ Barren/ 9 39.94 Plain (via Bathiya) Road Forest Pasgarhi Devri Janakpur 10 23.49 Plain/Rolling Built up/ Agriculture/ Forest Road Built up/ Agriculture/ Barren/ 11 Jhurai – Sarai Road 31.44 Plain/Rolling/Hilly Forest Built up/ Agriculture/ Barren/ 12 Sohagpur – Manpur Road 59.40 Plain Forest Source: Survey conducted along the project roads

88. Geologically the state is divided as northern plains, hilly region of Vindhyas, Narmada Valley, Malwa Pleatua and plains of Chattisgarh. Ground elevation in the project region varies from 300m to 600 m above mean sea level. The soils of state are rich and fertile. The state has a variety of soils ranging from rich clayey to gravely. The major groups of soils found in the state can be divided in to fallowing four categories i.e. alluvial, medium & deep black; shallow & medium black; and mixed red & black. Categorically state has two agro-climatic zones namely (i) Central Plateau & Hill Region and (ii) Western Plateau & Hill Region. These two zones have been further sub-grouped and the description regarding area and its soil and geological features is given in Table 11 below:

Table 10: Geological Features of the State Zone Sub-group District covered Rainfall Climate Type of (Region) (mm) Soil Central 1. Bundelkhand Chatterpur, 700 Dry Mixed red Plateau Datia, Tikamgarh subhumid & Black and Hill 2. Chhattisgarh Hills Mandla, Dindori 1570 Moist Red & Region subhumid Yellow 3. Keymore Plateau Jabalpur, Panna, 1100 Dry Medium & Satpura Hills Satna, Rewa, Sidhi, subhumid Black Seoni, Katni, Balaghat, Shahdol, Anooppur, Umariya 4. Vindhya Plateau Bhopal, Damoh, 1130 Dry Shallow Raisen, Sagar, subhumid to Medium Sehore, Vidisha Black 5. Satpura Plateau Betul, Chhindwara, 1220 Dry Shallow Narsinghpur subhumid to Medium Black 6. Central Narmada Hosangabad, Harda 1343 Dry Deep Valley subhumid Black 7. Gird Morena, Bhind, 670 Semi-arid Medium Gwalior, Guna, Black Shivpuri, alluvial Ashoknagar, Sheopur Western 8. Jhabua Hills Jhabua 988 Semi-arid Medium Plateau to deep and Hill black Region 9. Malwa & Nimar Indore, Dhar, Ujjain, 874 Semi-arid Medium Plateau Ratlam, Dewas, to deep Mandsaur, Rajgarh, black Shajapur, Khandwa, Khargone, Neemuch, Badwani, Burhanpur

89. Figure 4 shows the geological features of the state. The proposed subproject road sections in Rewa zone are situated in Keymore Plateau & Satpura Hills sub group of Central Plateau & Hill Region agroclimatic zone which is characterized as having very deep soils with texture ranging from sandy loan to clay in the surface and clay loam in the sub-soils with sub- angular blocky dominant texture. The soil type in the area is mainly shallow to medium black. Soil (Figure 5) of the area are mostly fertile and suitable for paddy crop. Stratigraphically, the project area mainly comprises Archaeans, Lametas, Deccan Trap and Recent formation. 37

Figure 4: Geological Map of Madhya Pradesh and Project Areas

Figure 5: Soil Map of Madhya Pradesh and Project Areas 39

90. Soil samples at several locations along the project corridor were collected and analyzed for its physiochemical properties using various standard testing procedures including IS:2720(Part-26) for pH and IS:2720 (Part-21) for electrical conductivity etc. The results shows that Soil is mostly found as sandy clayey loam. No black soil found in the sub project areas. Nitrogen content is varying between 60.0-65.0 mg/1000g and is poor in organic carbon content. The sub project road sections cross major river system of the state like Sone etc. However there are number of small streams and tributary rivers crossing the subproject roads. The samples were collected from following locations.  S1 - Kirhai Village (Km. 0+500) on Kharamseda Kirhai Ramgarh Road  S2 - Karsara Village on Jharkua-Raigaon-Karsara Road (Km 21+00)  S3 - Bhatura Village (Km 18+600) on Bhatura-Bhadpur-Barrakhurd Road  S4 - Parsona Village (Km 0+020) on Parsona Mada Road  S5 - Mada Village (Km 0+000) on Ramgarh Mada Road  S6 -Khaira Village on Harphari Khaira Road (Km 25+330)  S7 -Chitrangi Village (Km 1+120) on Chitrangi-Garhwa Road  S8 - Girwa Village (Km 11+000) on Anuppur-Jaitpur Road  S9 -Budhar Village (Km 0+100) on Gohparu-Rasmohni-Budhar Road  S10 - Papredi Village(Km 2+550) on Pasgarhi-Devri-Janakpur Road  S11 - Purail (Km 17+000) on Jhurai – Sarai Road  S12 - Chouri Village (km 21+160) on Sohagpur – Manpur Road

91. The results of the analysis of these samples are presented in Table 12.

Table 11:Soil Quality alongthe Subproject Road Sections Kharamseda Jharkua-Raigaon Bhatura Parsona-Mada Mada-Ramgarh Harphari-Khaira Chitrangi-Garhwa Anuppur Jaitpur Goparu Rasmoni Pasghari Jhurai-Sarai Sohagpur Road Name Ramgarh Road Road Bhadnpur Road Road Road Road Road Road Road Janakpur Road Road Manpur Road Sl. No. Papredi Kirhai Village Karsara Village Bhatura Village Parsona Village Mada Village Harphari Village Chitrangi village Girwa Village Budhar Village Purail Parameters Test method Unit Village(Km Chouri Village (Km. 0+500) (Km 21+00) (Km 18+600) (Km 0+020) (Km 0+000) (Km. 2+050) (1+120) (Km 11+000) (Km 0+100) (Km 17+000) 2+550) (km 21+160) S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 S-8 S-9 S-10 S-11 S-12 pH (1:5 IS:2720 (Part- 1 - 7.3 7.32 7.33 7.32 7.33 7.58 7.3 7.33 7.31 7.31 7.32 suspension) 26) 7.34 Electrical Conductivity IS:2720 (Part- µmhos/c 2 102.00 105.8 106.2 106 102 106.1 62.3 102 105.7 106 102 106.1 at 25OC (1:5 21) m suspension.) 3 Bulk Density STP/SOIL gm /cm3 1 1.342 1.3 1.31 1.3 1.341 1.52 1.33 1.31 1.34 1.32 1.323 4 Moisture STP/SOIL % 23 21 21 24 23 24 _ 23 24 24 23 21 Sandy Clayey Sandy Clayey Sandy Clayey Sandy Clayey Sandy Clayey Sandy Clayey Sandy Clayey Sandy Clayey Sandy Clayey Sandy Clayey 5 Texture STP/SOIL - Sandy Clayey Loam _ Loam Loam Loam Loam Loam Loam Loam Loam Loam Loam % by 6 Sand STP/SOIL 51 50 53 51 52 53 _ 51 50 51 50 53 mass % by 7 Clay STP/SOIL 27 22 21 22 22 _ 24 21 26 23 23 mass 21 % by 8 Silt STP/SOIL 14.00 12 12 14 13 11 _ 11 14 12 15 15 mass Cation 9 Exchange STP/SOIL mg/ kg 2 2.32 2.2 2.2 2.18 2.1 2.22 2.18 2.3 2.33 2.19 2.1 Capacity mg/1000 10 Nitrogen STP/SOIL 60.2 62.02 61.2 62.03 60.2 48.2 61.1 60.2 60.3 60.4 62.2 g 62.03 Potassium 11 STP/SOIL mg/kg 0.37 0.3 0.31 0.3 0.34 0.3 0.77 0.3 0.31 0.34 0.3 0.3 (as K) mg/1000 12 Phosphorus STP/SOIL 76 76 74 75 72 74 67 73 76 75 74 74 g mg/1000 13 Calcium STP/SOIL 2.1 2.7 2.6 2.3 2.1 _ 2.2 2.6 2.1 2.2 2.1 g 2.7 mg/1000 14 Magnesium STP/SOIL 1.32 1.12 1.33 1.31 1.3 1.3 _ 1.3 1.28 1.32 1.3 1.21 g Source: Soil testing conducted by DPR Consultant team

3. Seismicity

92. The entire Madhya Pradesh falls under zone least active to moderate zone as per seismic map of India. In the moderate damage risk zone structures are at risk of a Medvedev– Sponheuer–Karnik (MSK) scale VII with very strong earthquake where most people are frightened and try to run outdoors causing serious damage to older buildings, masonry chimneys collapse and small landslides. In the least active zone an MSK VI or less and is classified as the Low Damage Risk Zone where earthquake can frighten most people dishes and glassware may break and visible damage to masonry structures, cracks in plaster may occur. Figure 6 shows seismic Zone map of India (IS 1893 - Part I: 2002). Madhya Pradesh (and project roads) falls under zone least active to moderate zone as per seismic map of India.

Figure 6: Seismic Zoning Map of India showing Project Road Locations (Source: IS 1893 - Part I: 2002)

4. Water Resources and Hydrology

93. Two facts of the vital importance need to be mentioned about Madhya Pradesh state. Firstly, the land of Madhya Pradesh is criss-crossed by India’s four major rivers namely Narmada, Tapti, Sone and Mahanadi along-with their numerous tributaries catering state much needed water resources. Secondly, the state is sitting atop the largest coal reserves of India. These are the two commodities which alone can keep the wheel of progress turning. The State is divided into five river basins namely Narmada (Shahdol district), Tapti (Betul District), Mahi (Dhar district), Godawari (Wainganga - Balaghat District) and Ganga & Yamuna basin feed by Chambal, Sindh, Betwa, Kuanwari-Sindh and Son, Rihand & Ken rivers. The major perennial rivers of Madhya Pradesh namely Narmada River, Betwa River, Chambal River originate in Madhya Pradesh and flow to the seven bordering states. The entire state is drained by major river Narmada and its tributaries. Figure shows water basins in project influence area. Availability of water in the state from ten major rivers of the state is more than 81000 million cubic meters out of which approximately 56857 million cubic meters i.e. 69.74% had already been utilized.

94. Current ground water condition is safe in 24 districts, semi-critical in 12 districts, critical in 4 districts and over-exploited in 8 districts. Critical districts are Dewas, Khargoan, Shajapur, Tikamgarh and over-exploited districts are Badwani, Chhindwara, Dhar, Indore, Mandsour, Neemuch, Ratlam, Ujjain.  Total net ground water availability of Madhya Pradesh (1998) = 31093575.60 Hectare meter (Ha.m.)  Total current ground water draft of Madhya Pradesh = 1437520.00 Ha.m.

95. The surface water quality in the regions is reported to be acceptable and also found by visual identifications. There are no reports of any water born decease in the region. Local communities using this water for drinking purpose without any treatment. In case of ground water quality, it is generally good in entire region. People use ground water for domestic purposes without any treatment. Overall ground water quality is acceptable.

96. The subproject road sections do not cross any major river of the state. However there are number of small streams and tributary rivers crossing the subprojects roads. Also there are number of wells and hand pump exist along the project road sections.Table 13 lists out the major rivers, which cross the project road. Besides these rivers there are several small streams and small ponds exist along the project road section.

Table 12: Main Rivers / Stream crossing the project road sections S. Name of Road Name of rivers/Streams Remarks No. 1 Kharamseda Kirhai Marjua river at Km 31.22, canal at All bridges on this rivers Ramgarh 31.60 and 8 small nallahs are retained 2 Jharkua Raigaon Two streams i.e. chaura nallah at Km 1 bridge will be Karsara 3.82 and nallah at Km16.25 reconstructed 43

S. Name of Road Name of rivers/Streams Remarks No. 3 Bhatura Bhadpur Two nallah at Km 4.935 and nallah at Both structure are Barrakhurd Km 7.680 reconstructed 4 Parsona Mada Lauwa river at km 10.23, Gurra river at All bridges on this rivers km 13.52, and two nallahs at km 12.55 are retained and km 42.10. 5 Ramgarh Mada Rivers at km 8.27 and km 14.82, and All bridges on this rivers three nallahs at km 1.20, km 5.05, and are retained km 11.30. 6 Harphari Khaira Khadbad river at Km 25.55 and 3 No new bridge nallas construction 7 Chitrangi-Garhwa 19Slabe culvert, 5 HPC, Only repering No major bridge Road of culvers will be done 8 Anuppur Jaitpur There are 5 rivers Jamuna, Nagdaha, 2 structure will be Kaser, Kunak & Karhar At Km 13.580, reconstructed, 1 is Km 20.060, Km 25.415, Km 34.935 & widened and remaining Km 26.105 respectively and 4 nallahs are retained 9 Gohparu Rasmohni Sone river at Km 7.335 and 6 nallahs All structures are retained Budhar 10 Pasgarhi Devri Sone river at Km 21.625 and 3 nallahs 1 river bridge will be Janakpur reconstructed and other structures are retained 11 Jhurai – Sarai Mahan river at Km 13.45, Dhamar river All bridges on this rivers at Km 19.70, and 4 nallahs at Km 0.30, are retained Km 8.4, Km 11.8, Km 18.10 12 Sohagpur – Manpur Johilla river at Km 41.600, Janar river All structures are retained at Km 45.550 and 8 nallahs Source: Inventory of structures as per DPR.

97. Ground water is the major water source in the project areas for drinking purpose. The source of recharging of ground water is mostly from rainfall and canals. Hand pumps are commonly used to draw the water from ground in the villages. Static water levels vary along the stretch of the subproject roads. First or upper ground water aquifer lies in the range of 12 to 18 m below ground level (bgl). The ground water levels in the area show a decline of 0.8 m to 1.2 m from post monsoon to pre monsoon period.

5. Water Quality

98. In order to establish baseline conditions, groundwater samples were collected. The sampling locations were selected after the field reconnaissance and a review of all the water bodies/ resources in the project influence area. Samples were collected as per IS- 2488 (Part I- V).

99. Ground water (drinking water) samples were analyses as per IS: 10500-1991. Grab sample were collected from water source and were analysed for various Physico- chemical parameters as per the procedures laid down in the APHA and BIS. Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer and UV/VIS Spectrophotometer were used for analysis of water samples according to the necessity.

100. The water samples were collected from following locations (Table) along the subproject roads.  W1-Kirhai Village (Km. 0+500) on Kharamseda Kirhai Ramgarh Road

 W2-Raigaon Village on Jharkua Raigaon Karsara Road (Km. 7+00)  W3-Karsara Village on Jharkua Raigaon Karsara Road (Km 21+00)  W4- Bhatura Village (Km 18+600) on Bhatura Bhadpur Barrakhurd Road  W5- Parsona Village (Km 0+020) on Parsona Mada Road  W6- Mada Village (Km 0+000) on Ramgarh Mada Road  W7-Khaira Village on Harphari Khaira Misirgawan via Shivpurva Road (Km. 25+330)  W8-HarphariVillage (Km. 2+050) on Harphari Khaira Misirgawan via Shivpurva Road  W9- Chitrangi Village (Km 1+120) on Chitrangi-Garhwa Road  W10- Girwa Village (Km 11+000 ) on Anuppur Jaitpur Road  W11- Budhar Village (Km 0+100) on Gohparu Rasmohni Budhar (via Bathiya) Road  W12- Papredi Village(Km 2+550) on Pasgarhi Devri Janakpur Road  W13- Purail (Km 17+000) on Jhurai – Sarai Road  W14- Chouri Village (km 21+160) on Sohagpur – Manpur Road  W15- Kathar (Km 52+800) on Sohagpur – Manpur Road

101. The results of the analysed of these samples are presented in Table 14. The results were compared with standards for drinking water quality (Appendix 5).

102. It can be seen from Table-14 that the pH of the sampled water in the region is well within permissible limits (6.5 -8.5). Level of total dissolved solids is found to be on higher side, varying from 518 mg/l at Raigaon Village (Km. 7+00) on Jharkua -Raigaon -Karsara Road to 654 mg/l at Khaira Village (Km. 25+330) on Harfari Khaira-Misirgawan Road, against the permissible limit of 500 mg/l. The water is also hard in nature with total hardness level ranging from 300-350 mgfl against the permissible limit of 200 mg/l. Other water quality parameters analyzed like chloride, sulphate, fluorides are Ground Water sample collection along found well within the permissible limits the project road for drinking waters as specified by CBCB on all sample subproject roads. Overall the ground water quality in the project areas in good. 45

Table 13: Water Quality Characteristics along the Project Roads

Requirem Permissible Kirhai Raigaon Karsara Bhatura Parsona Mada Harphari Khaira Girwa Budhar Papredi Purail Chouri Kathar Chitrangi Test ent Limit in Village Village Village Village Village Village Village Village Village Village Village Village Village Village Sr. No. Parameter Unit absence of village method (Accepta (Km. (Km. (Km (Km (Km (Km (Km. (Km. (Km (Km (Km (Km (km (km alternate (1+120) ble Limit) 0+500) 7+00) 21+00) 18+600) 0+020) 0+000) 2+050) 25+330) 11+000) 0+100) 2+550) 17+000) 21+160) 21+160) source W-1 W-2 W-3 W-4 W-5 W-6 W-7 W-8 W-9 W-10 W-11 W-12 W-13 W-14 W-15 IS-3025 1 pH value - 6.5-8.5 - 7.1 7.11 7.13 7.11 7.11 7.11 7.09 7.12 7.45 7.12 7.9 7.09 7.09 7.8 7.11 (P-11) IS-3025 2 Temperature 0C - - 30 32 32 30 29 27 30 31 _ 29 31 30 27 27 29 (P-9) Dissolve IS-3025 3 mg/l - - 3.2 3.3 3.40 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.60 3.4 _ 3.3 3.6 3.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 Oxygen (P-38) Conductivity IS-3025 4 µS/c m - - 959.1 960.12 960.02 960.01 953.01 958.01 959.12 959.22 121 958.02 953.7 958.9 953.22 960.03 958.02 @250C (P-14) Total IS-3025 5 Suspended mg/l - - <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 _ <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 (P-17) Solid Total dissolve IS-3025 6 mg/l 500 2000 624 623.32 608 623.56 623 622 622.5 624 _ 622.6 624 624 622.8 623 622.6 solid (TDS) (P-16) Alkalinity (as IS: 3025 7 mg/l 200 600 295 308 310 293 296 299 312 312 _ 297 298 306 291 311 297 CaCO3) (P-23) Total hardness IS: 3025 8 mg/l 200 600 356.8 360.08 362.06 353.04 352.17 355.07 361.06 362 140 352.03 362.03 362.03 353.07 360.8 361.05 (as CaCO3) (P-23) IS: 3025 9 Calcium (as Ca) mg/l 75 200 267 272 263 261 253 264 260 262 89 255 254 272 254 267 262 (P-40) Magnesium (as IS: 3025 10 mg/l 30 100 74 72 72 75 75 76 71 68 88 75 69 72 76 74 72 mg) (P-46) IS: 3025 11 Chloride (as Cl) mg/l 250 1000 57 51 51 52 57 53 51 49 122 54 56 51 55 51 50 (P-32) Phosphate (as IS-3025 12 mg/l - - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 _ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 P) (P-31) IS: 3025 13 Nitrate (as NO3) mg/l 45 No Relaxation 3.3 3.1 3.4 3.8 3.8 3.3 3 3.6 _ 3.6 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.5 3.6 (P-34) Sulphate (as IS: 3025 14 mg/l 200 400 43 48.1 47.2 49.1 49 46 47 47.45 _ 49.1 46.6 45.09 49.1 45.09 47.37 SO4) (P-24) IS-3025 15 Sodium (as Na) mg/l - - 44 43 42 46 40 45 41 43 77 42 40 42 42 42 43 (P- 45) Potassium (as IS-3025 16 mg/l - - 4 6 4 4 5 5 4 6 _ 4 5 5 5 5 6 K) (P-45) APHA- 17 COD (as O2) mg/l - - BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL _ BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 5220B BOD (at 270C 3- IS-3025 18 mg/l - - BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL _ BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Days) (P-44) 19 Faecal Coliform IS-1622 No/100ml 0 Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent _ Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent 20 Total Coliform IS-1622 No/100ml 10 Max Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent _ Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Source: Water Quality Monitoring carried out by Consultant Team as part of DPR

6. Air Quality

103. Ambient air quality in the state is quite pure compared to other neighboring states. Except for few urban centers, the ambient air quality along the selected subproject roads is good. There are no major industrial activities along the project roads. Dust arising from unpaved surfaces, forest fire, smoke charcoal production and domestic heating, and vehicular pollution are sources of pollution in the region. Firewood burning is the major contributor in the ambient pollution load. Industrial and vehicular pollution is mainly concentrated in the major commercial areas.

104. Vehicular pollution is a secondary source of pollution in the region as the traffic density is low. Pollution from vehicles is mainly due to use of low-grade fuel, and poor maintenance of vehicles. The level of pollution in rural areas is much lower than that of the urban areas due to lower volume of traffic. The traffic density in the state is very low. There is sudden increase in the number of vehicles in the town area during the last one decade producing a lot of smoke. The use of a large number of second-hand diesel jeeps as transport is another cause of air pollution.

105. Secondary information is not available on ambient air quality of the project road area. The major transport on the project road sections is the traffic flowing on unpaved or damaged roads. This might also add to the air pollution load on the project sections.

106. The base-line status of the ambient air-quality was assessed using a scientifically designed ambient air-quality monitoring network. The design of this network was based on the following:  meteorological conditions;  the assumed regional influences on background air quality;  the areas where impact would most likely be greatest;  present land use along the proposed alignment; and  traffic congestion points.

107. To establish the baseline ambient air quality, Ambient Air Quality Monitoring (AAQM) stations were set up at 14 locations as indicated in Table 15.

Table 14: Details of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations Location S. No. Name of the locations Source code Kirhai Village (Km. 0+500) on Kharamseda Kirhai Ramgarh 1 A-1 Residential Road 2 A-2 Raigaon Village on Jharkua Raigaon Karsara Road (Km. 7+00) Residential 3 A-3 Karsara Village on Jharkua Raigaon Karsara Road (Km 21+00) Residential Bhatura Village (Km 18+600) on Bhatura Bhadpur Barrakhurd 4 A-4 Residential Road 5 A-5 Parsona Village (Km 0+020) on Parsona Mada Road Residential 6 A-6 Mada Village (Km 0+000) on Ramgarh Mada Road Residential Harphari Village (Km. 2+050) on Harphari Khaira Misirgawan 7 A-7 Residential via Shivpurva Road Khaira Village on Harphari Khaira Misirgawan via Shivpurva 8 A-8 Residential Road (Km. 25+330) 9 A-9 Chitrangi Village (Km 1+120) on Chitrangi-Garhwa Road Residential 10 A-10 Girwa Village (Km 11+000 ) on Anuppur Jaitpur Road Residential Budhar Village (Km 0+100) on Gohparu Rasmohni Budhar (via 11 A-11 Residential Bathiya) Road 12 A-12 Papredi Village(Km 2+550) on Pasgarhi Devri Janakpur Road Residential 13 A-13 Purail (Km 17+000) on Jhurai – Sarai Road Residential 14 A-14 Chouri Village (km 21+160) on Sohagpur – Manpur Road Residential 47

108. At each of the five locations monitoring was undertaken as per new notification issued by MoEFCC on 16th November 2009, in the second quarter of 2014. Data for the following parameters was collected.  Particulate Matter PM10  Particulate Matter PM 2.5  Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)  Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx)  Carbon monoxide (CO)

109. The sampling of PM10, PM2.5, SO2, and NOx was undertaken on a 24-hourly basis while 8- hourly samples were collected for CO. PM, SO2, and NOx were monitored using M/s Envirotech Instruments Private Ltd; make Respirable Dust Sampler (APM 460) (Figure 4.12) along with gaseous attachment (Model APM 415 & 411). Whatman GF/A filter papers were used for PM. Carbon monoxide (CO) samples were monitored by using M/s Endee Engineers Pvt. Ltd. make gas detector model No. CO96 & GP - 200P respectively.

110. Methodology adopted for sampling and analysis and instrument used for analysis in laboratory are presented in Table 16.

Table 15: Techniques Used for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Sl. Parameter Technique Instrument MinimumDetectable No. Used Limit (μg/m3)

1. PM10 Respirable Dust Sampler Electrical 1.0 (Gravimetric method) Balance

2. PM2.5 Respirable Dust Sampler Electrical 1.0 (Gravimetric method) Balance 3. Sulphur Dioxide Improved West & Gaeke Colorimeter 5.0 Method 4. Nitrogen Oxide Jacob & Hochheiser Colorimeter 5.0 modified (Na-Arsenite) Method 5. Carbon Gas Chromatograph 0.01 Monoxide

111. A summary of results for each location is presented in Table 17 of the existing air quality along the project roads at eleven monitored locations. These results are compared with the new National Ambient Air Quality Standards prescribed by the MoEFCC for respective zones.

Table 16: Summary of AAQM Results along the Subproject Road Sections (Average Values)

Limits as Kirhai Raigaon Karsara Bhatura Parsona Mada Harphari Khaira Girwa Budhar per Chitrangi Papredi Purail Chouri Test Village Village Village Village Village Village Village Village Village Village Sr. No. Parameter Units Environm village Village(K (Km Village Method ent (Km. (Km. (Km (Km (Km (Km (Km. (Km. (Km (Km (1+120) m 2+550) 17+000) (km (Protecti 0+500) 7+00) 21+00) 18+600) 0+020) 0+000) 2+050) 25+330) 11+000) 0+100) on) Act. 21+160) A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7 A-8 A-9 A-10 A-11 A-12 A-13 A-14 Particulate IS:5182 1 Matter µg/m3 100 73 73 71 76 71 72 76 73 57 72 72 73 72 71 Part- XXIII (PM10) Particulate CPCB Matter 2 Volume – µg/m3 60 21 25 22 25 20 22 23 22 44 22 21 24 23 22 (PM10) 1 / Grav (PM2.5) Sulphur IS:5182 3 µg/m3 80 6.5 6.4 6.3 6.5 6.1 6.3 6.4 6.8 21 6.2 6.3 6.6 6.2 6.7 Dioxide Part-II Nitrogen IS:5182 4 µg/m3 80 16.1 16.5 16.4 17.1 16 16.4 16.3 17.3 25 16.8 16 16.4 16.8 16.1 Dioxide Part-VI Carbon IS:5182 5 mg/m3 4 0.358 0.368 0.363 0.368 0.353 0.363 0.37 0.363 1.5 0.349 0.354 0.367 0.349 0.363 Monoxide Part-X Source: Air Quality Monitoring carried out by Consultant Team as part of DPR,

112. It can be seen from the Table-17 that at all the monitored locations the ambient air quality parameters are well within the NMQ standards prescribed by MoEFCC for residential areas. Maximum concentration of PM10 is 76 μg/m3 found at Bhatura Village (Km 18+600) on Bhatura Bhadanpur Road and Harphari Village (Km 1+850) on Harphari Khaira Road, whereas maximum concentration of PM2.5 is 52 μg/m3 found at Bhatura Village (Km 18+600) on Bhatura Bhadanpur Road and Raigaon Village on Jharkua Raigaon Karsara Road (Km. 7+00). These are well within the standards of 100 μg/m3 and 60 μg/m3 respectively for PM10 and PM2.5. Overall the air quality along the subproject roads is not an issue. The National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NMQS) prescribed by MOEF are given in Appendix 3.

7. Noise

113. Noise pollution is not a current problem in the region except in commercial location in urban areas where major settlements are along the road, and high traffic flow. However, few commercial locations will experience increase in noise levels but still the ambient noise quality is expected to be higher than the permissible limits.

114. During construction period, temporary increase in the noise levels are expected from the movement of construction machineries and construction activities. Suitable barriers and timely scheduling of construction activities will minimize these impacts.

115. No secondary information was available on noise level in the project areas. In order to establish the baseline noise quality in the project areas, a reconnaissance survey was therefore undertaken to identify noise generating sources and sensitive receptor such as school, hospitals, temples, built-up areas. Fourteen locations listed in Table 18 were selected for monitoring the noise level.

Table 17: Details of Noise Level Monitoring Locations S. Location Name of the locations Source No. code Kirhai Village (Km. 0+500) on Kharamseda Kirhai Ramgarh 1 N-1 Residential Road 2 N-2 Raigaon Village on Jharkua Raigaon Karsara Road (Km. 7+00) Residential Karsara Village on Jharkua Raigaon Karsara Road (Km 3 N-3 Residential 21+00) Bhatura Village (Km 18+600) on Bhatura Bhadpur Barrakhurd 4 N-4 Residential Road 5 N-5 Parsona Village (Km 0+020) on Parsona Mada Road Residential 6 N-6 Mada Village (Km 0+000) on Ramgarh Mada Road Residential 7 N-7 Harphari Village (Km. 2+050) on Harphari Khaira Road Residential Khaira Village on Harphari Khaira Misirgawan via Shivpurva 8 N-8 Residential Road (Km. 25+330) 9 N-9 Chitrangi Village (Km 1+120) on Chitrangi-Garhwa Road Residential 10 N-10 Girwa Village (Km 11+000 ) on Anuppur Jaitpur Road Residential Budhar Village (Km 0+100) on Gohparu Rasmohni Budhar 11 N-11 Residential Road 12 N-12 Papredi Village(Km 2+550) on Pasgarhi Devri Janakpur Road Residential 13 N-13 Purail (Km 17+000) on Jhurai Sarai Road Residential 14 N-14 Chouri Village (km 21+160) on Sohagpur Manpur Road Residential

116. Methodology: At each of the slected locations, Sound Pressure Level (SPL) measurements were taken at an interval of 1 minute using a sound level meter of Lutron make Digital Sound Level Meter. At all these locations, daytime noise levels were monitored during the period 6 am to 9 pm and night-time noise levels during the period 9 pm to 10 pm. Noise readings, with setting at ‘A’ response - slow mode, were recorded. The readings were tabulated and a frequency distribution table prepared from which 24 hourly, hourly, and Average Leq noise levels were calculated.

117. Presentation of Results: It can be seen from the table-18 that at all locations the average day time noise level found to be lower than the prescribed permissible limits of 55 dB(A) for residential areas. The scenario is similar in case of night time noise levels. The day time noise level in all sections is ranging between 45 dB (A) to 47 dB(A) the night time noise levels is ranging between 35.0 dB(A) to 39.0 dB(A).

Table 18: Ambient Noise Level in decibel (A) along the Project Road Prescribed Standards dB(A) Day Time Night Time Locations Category of Day Night dB(A) dB(A) Area/ Zone Time Time Kirhai Village (Km. 0+500) 46.8 36.1 Residential Area 55 45 Raigaon Village (Km. 7+00) 45 39 Residential Area 55 45 Karsara Village (Km 21+00) 45 36 Residential Area 55 45 Bhatura Village (Km 18+600) 47.5 38.9 Residential Area 55 45 Parsona Village (Km 0+020) 46.3 36.9 Residential Area 55 45 Mada Village (Km 0+000) 47 35 Residential Area 55 45 Harphari Village (Km. 2+050) 47 38.5 Residential Area 55 45 Chitrangi Village (Km 1+120) 49 41 Residential Area 55 45 Khaira Village (Km. 25+330) 46 37.8 Residential Area 55 45 Girwa Village (Km 11+000) 45.2 35.8 Residential Area 55 45 Budhar Village (Km 0+100) 46 39 Residential Area 55 45 Papredi Village (Km 2+550) 46 38.2 Residential Area 55 45 Purail (Km 17+000) 45.2 36.6 Residential Area 55 45 Chouri Village (km 21+160) 47 37.5 Residential Area 55 45 Source: Noise Monitoring carried out by Consultant Team

C. Biological Environment

1. Forests and Vegetation

118. Variability in climatic and edaphic conditions brings about significant difference in the forest types of the state. There are four important forest types viz. Tropical Moist, Tropical Dry, Tropical Thorn, Subtropical broadleaved Hill forests. The forest area can also be classified based on the composition of forest and terrain of the area. Based on composition, there are three important forest formations namely Teak forest, Sal forest and Miscellaneous Forests. Bamboo bearing areas are widely distributed in the state. To obviate pressure on the natural forests, plantations have been undertaken in forest and non forest areas to supplement the availability of fuel wood, small timber, fodder etc.

119. The forest cover in the state (based on State of Forest Report 2015), is 77,462 km2 which is 25.13% of the state`s geographical area. In terms of forest canopy density classes, the state has 6,629 km2 areas under very dense forest, 34,902 km2 areas under moderately dense forest and 35,931 km2 areas under open forest. Comparison of the current forest cover 51

assessment with the previous assessment (SFR 2003) shows that there is decrease in forest cover of 60 km2.

120. The subproject districts in general have moderate to high percentage of forest cover. Three of the project districts (Umariya, Shahdol, Sidhi) have forest cover above state’s average. Other districts have the forest cover below state average. Table 20 below presents the status of forests in various districts through which projects, roads are location. However, since the proposed improvements under the Project will be carried out within existing ROW, diversion of forest land is not required for the proposed widening .

Table 19: Area under Forest type in the Districts Very Total Mod. Dense Open Total Dense Sl. No. District Geographical Forest Forest Forest (Sq. Forest Area (Sq. Km.) (Sq. Km.) (Sq. Km.) Km.) (Sq. Km) 1 Satna 7502 13 942 794 1749 2 Rewa 6314 65 398 314 777 3 Shahdol 9952 245 1255 1224 2724 4 Umaria 4076 411 1086 537 2034 5 Sidhi 10526 717 1935 1447 4099 State as 6 308245 6629 34902 35931 77462 whole Source: State of Forest Report, 2015

121. Vegetation along the project road sections are mostly covered by the agriculture, think grass and secondary Moist Deciduous Forest as shown in the Forest map of the Madhya Pradesh state in Figure 7.

Figure 7: Forest Map of Madhya Pradesh State (Source: State of Environment Report, 2015) 53

122. Most of the subproject roads are passing through plain/rolling terrain with land use being agriculture. However three road sections (in Singrauli district) are passing through reserve forest areas of Madhya Pradesh State. About 16.5 km (73 percent) of the road length of Ramgarh-Mada road, 12.5 (35 percent) road lengths of Jhurai-Sarai road , 4.8 km (18 percent) of Harfari Khaira-Misirgawan road and 6.6 Km (29 percent) Chitrangi-Garhwa road are passing through forest areas. Details of the forest locations along the subproject road sections are listed in Table 21.

Table 20: Detail of forest location along the project sections Length Sl. Length passes Name of Road Remarks No (Km) through forest (Km) Reserve Forest (degraded) along the road Kirhai Ramgarh in patches (mostly on RHS at 50-200m 1 34.35 NIL Mukundpur away from RoW for about 21 Km length) with clear Marking of forest boundary Jharkua Raigaon 2 23.95 NIL No Forest Karsara Bhatura Bhadpur Total Km 4.050 road length is along the 3 20.05 4.050 Barrakhurd forest area with very thin vegetation 4 Parsona Mada 24.39 NIL No Forest Approx 16.500 Km of the road alignment 5 Ramgarh Mada 19.87 16.500 is passing through protected forest area 4.800 km of road length passes through 6 Harphari Khaira 25.99 4.800 forest area with very thin vegetation Chitrangi-Garhwa 6.600 km of road length passes through 7 22.67 6.600 Road forest area 3.450 km of road length passes through 8 Anuppur Jaitpur 36.66 3.450 forest area Gohparu Rasmohni 7.500 km of road length passes through 9 39.94 7.500 Budhar forest area Pasgarhi Devri 5.850 km of road length passes through 10 23.49 5.850 Janakpur forest area 12.500 km of road length passes through 11 Jhurai – Sarai 31.44 12.500 forest area 21.240 km of road length passes through Sohagpur – 12 59.40 21.240 forest area. In some stretches have dense Manpur forest also

123. Field survey has been carried out to identify the number and type of trees to be affected by the proposed improvement work of main alignments. It is envisaged that about 3378 trees are likely to be cut for the implementation of the improvements proposed under the project for eleven selected subprojects. Main species found are Mahua (Madhuca Longifolia), Pipal (Ficus religiosa), Jamun (Syzygium Cumin), Sarai (Shorea robusta), Chola (Cicer arietinum), Babool (Acacia arabica, Willd.), Aam (Mangifera indica), Sagon (Tectona grandis Linn.), Mahua (Bassia longifolia), Babool (Arabica nilotica), Chirol (Holoptelea integrifolia), and Neem (Azadirachta indica. Table 22 show road wise details of the trees to be cut.

Table 21: Detail of trees within formation width of the project Road alignments (to be cut) Main Tree Species S Trees to Road Section Local name Remarks No. be cut (botanical Name) 1 Kharamseda Kirhai Ramgarh 242 Mahua (Mafhuc Thin vegetation cover 2 Jharkua Raigaon Karsara 455 Longifolia), Pipal Thin vegetation cover 3 Bhatura Bhadpur Barrakhurd 244 (Ficus religiosa), Thin vegetation cover 4 Parsona Mada 54 Jamun (Syzygium Thin vegetation cover Cumin), Sarai Thick Forest Cover in 5 Ramgarh Mada 376 (Shorea robusta), some sections Harphari Khaira Misirgawan via Chola (Cicer Thick Forest Cover in 6 586 Shivpurva arietinum), Babool some sections 7 Chitrangi-Garhwa 254 (Acacia arabica, Thin vegetation cover 8 Anuppur Jaitpur 404 Wild), and Aam Thin vegetation cover Gohparu Rasmohni Budhar (via (Mangifera Indica), 9 264 Thin vegetation cover Bathiya) Sagon (Tectona 10 Pasgarhi Devri Janakpur 222 grandis Linn), Mahua Thin vegetation cover (Bassia longifolia), 11 Jhurai – Sarai 80 Thin vegetation cover Babool (Acacia arabica, Wild), Chola (Cicer arietinum), 12 Sohagpur – Manpur 197 Chirol (Holoptelea Thin vegetation cover integrifolia), and Neem (Azadirachta indica). Total 3378

Source: Field Survey carried out by the Consultant Team, 2016

2. Wildlife and Protected Area Network

124. Madhya Pradesh is a pioneer state in the national movement for conservation of flora and fauna. Conservation oriented legal proviso were made in the erstwhile Acts regulating hunting of game -birds and wild animals. In tune with the national consciousness towards conservation of flora and fauna the state government began setting up a network of in-situ conservation areas (national parks and sanctuaries) under the provisions of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. There are 9 National Parks and 25 Sanctuaries spread over an area of 10,862 sq. km constituting 11.40% of the total forest area and 3.52% of the geographical area of the state. Efforts are under way to increase the Protected Area network to 15% of the forest or 5% of the geographical area as suggested by State Wildlife Board. Table 23 shows (Figure 8) the details of National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries of the State.

Table 22: Protected Area Network in the State of Madhya Pradesh National Parks Wildlife Sanctuaries Name Area (sq. km) Name Area (sq. km) 1. Kanha 940 1. Bori 646 2. Bandhavgarh 446 2. Bagdara 478 3. Panna 543 3. Phen 111 4. Pench 292.85 4. Ghatigaon 511 5. Satpura 524 5. Gandhisagar 369 6. Sanjay 1471 6. Karera 202 7. Madhav 156 7. Ken Ghariyal 45 8. Vanvihar 4.45 8. Kheoni 123 9. Fossil 0.27 9. Narsinghgarh 57 55

National Parks Wildlife Sanctuaries Name Area (sq. km) Name Area (sq. km) 10. N. Chambal 435 11. Nauradehi 1197 12. Pachmari 417 13. Panpatha 249 14. Kuno 345 15. Pench 449 16. Ratapani 435 17. Sanjay Dubri 365 18. Singhori 288 19. Son Ghariyal 209 20. Sardapur 348 21. Sailana 13 22. Ralamandal 5 23. Orchha 46 24. Gangau - 25. V. Durgawati 24 Source: Office of Chief Wildlife Warden, Forest Department, Madhya Pradesh

Project Area

Source: Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun Figure 8: Protected Area Map of Madhya Pradesh State

125. Informal interviews were held with the local villagers, livestock herders to gather information on the presence of wildlife and their habitats along the project rods. Officials from

local forest department were also consulted in the process. Local communities and local forest officials informed that there are no protected area along the proposed alignments of the subproject roads. It can also be seen from the figure 11 that the subproject road sections does not pass through any protected area such as Wildlife Sanctuary, National park or bio –reserve. There is no wildlife sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary, National park or bio –reserve within 10 km from the subproject roads.

3. Rare or Endangered Species

126. No rare or endangered species found in corridor of impact along the subproject roads.

4. Fauna and Wild life

127. The project road sections traverses mainly through agricultural fields and during field survey no wild animals were spotted. However in discussion with the forestry department and during the public consultations, it was found that common fauna in the study area are wild dogs, wild cats, foxes and jackals chital or Indian Spotted Deer (Axis axis); monkey (Rhesus macaque), and hare (Lepus nigricolis) are listed as least concern by the IUCN based on the wide range of occurrence. Also documented to occur in the project areas are Jackal (Canis aureus indicus); jungle cat (Felix chaus), and fox (Vulpes bengalensis). The project roads does not have presence of any Schedule 1 species as per Wildlife Protection Act of GOI.

D. Socio-economic Environment

1. Demography

128. Madhya Pradesh is a land-locked state in the central part of country with a population of about 72.6 million with more than 73 percent of the population living in the rural areas. The State has 50 districts consisting of 313 blocks and 55393 villages. The human population density is 236 persons/km2 (as per 2011 census) compared to 383 persons/km2 (as per 2011 census) for the entire country. Sex ratio is 931(2011 census) against the 943 (2011 census) in the country. The demographic feature of Madhya Pradesh is unique that there are many recognized tribes (about 40 percent of country), which inhabit mostly the remote areas and each with distinct culture, ethos, and traditional knowledge systems. The major minority groups in the state namely Gonds, Bhils and Oraons. The majority of the people survive on subsistence economy based mainly on the agriculture, supplemented with forest products, animal husbandry, and crafts/handloom.

129. Total population of Madhya Pradesh as per 2011 census is 72,626,809 of which male and female are 37,612,306 and 35,014,503 respectively The state has a growth rate of about 20 percent which is above the national average of about 17 and thus the population of the state is rising considerably given the progress in the state.

130. About 73% of the state’s population resides in rural areas. The state also has one of the largest tribal populations with 18 districts being predominantly tribal districts in the country. The share of schedule tribes and the schedule castes is 20.27% and 15.17% respectively. The overall literacy ratio in the state is 69.32 with male literacy being 78.73% and female literacy of 63.74%.

131. The BPL survey of 2002-03 with updated figures to October 2010 highlight that 46.48 lakh (47.4 percent) of households of rural Madhya Pradesh are living below the poverty line. 57

The state accounts for nearly 11 percent of the total rural population in the country. The tribal households are the poorest among the most deprived social groups in India. In rural areas, 58.6 percent of the tribal population was found to be poor as compared to 42.8 percent among the SC in Madhya Pradesh. Table 24 presents the demographic features of the state and the project districts.

Table 23: Demographic Features of State and Project Districts as per 2011 census Madhya Particular Unit Shahdol Anuppur Rewa Sidhi Satna Singrauli Umaria Pradesh Total No. 72,626,809 1,066,063 749237 2,365,106 1127033 2,228,935 1,178,273 644758 population Males No. 37,612,306 540,021 379114 1,225,100 575912 1,157,495 613,637 330674 Females No. 35,014,503 526,042 370123 1,140,006 551121 1,071,440 564,636 314084 Sex Ratio per ‘000 931 974 976 931 959 926 920 950 Population per Sq 236 172 200 375 232 297 208 158 Density Km Population % 20.35 17.39 12.3 19.86 23.72 19.19 28.05 24.96 Growth Rate Level of % 69.32 66.67 67.88 71.62 64.43 72.26 60.41 65.89 Literacy Literacy Rate % 78.73 76.14 78.26 81.43 74.44 81.37 71.34 76.02 (Male) Literacy rate % 54.49 56.99 57.3 61.16 54.07 62.45 48.53 55.23 (Female) Total Child Population (0- No 10809395 159,806 106071 351,983 194528 330,661 209,792 103414 6 Age) Male population (0- No 5636172 81,943 54388 186,697 101633 173,093 109,094 53237 6 Age) Female Population (0- No 5173223 77,863 51683 165,286 92895 157,568 100,698 50177 6 Age) Child sex ratio per ‘000 918 950 950 885 914 910 923 943 (0-6 Age) SC population % 15.17 % 8.4 10 383508 130202 17.88 10.11 9.02 ST Population % 20.27 % 44.7 47.9 311985 313304 14.36 13.2 46.64 Source: http://www.census2011.co.in/census

2. Land Resources

132. The mostof the geographical area of the state or 307,560sq.km or about 98% is available for utilization. Major portion of the landuse is under agriculture followed by forests. About 28% is under forestcover. Agriculture is the major landuse in state followed by forests. The area under various land uses in the state is presented in the Table 25.

Table 24: Land Use Pattern of the State S.No. Land use pattern of the State Area in Hectares Percentage 1. Total Geographical area 30,825 - 2. Reporting area for land utilization 30,757 100.00 3. Forests 8,696 28.27 4. Not available for Land cultivation 3,401 11.06 5. Permanent pastures and other grazing lands 1,337 4.25 6. Land underMisc. tree crops and groves 19 0.06

S.No. Land use pattern of the State Area in Hectares Percentage 7. Cultivable Wasteland 1,160 3.77 8. Fallow lands other than current fallows 621 2.02 9. Current fallows 582 1.89 10. Net area sown 14,941 48.58 Source: Land Use Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture, GOI, 2008-09.

3. Economic Development

133. The State of Madhya Pradesh was formed after re-organisation and became the third largest Indian state covering 9.5 per cent of the country’s area. The state’s industrial base is quite diverse and vibrant. Industry is largely resource-driven, leveraging the state’s natural wealth in the form of limestone, coal, iron ore, silica, bauxite, soya, and cotton. The state has strongindustry base in sectors like cement, steel, textile and soya processing.

134. Madhya Pradesh's gross state domestic product (nominal GDP) for 2010–11 was 2,600billion (approximately US$47,120,000,000). The per-capita figure was US$ 583: the fourth lowest in the country. Between 1999 and 2008, the annualized growth rate of the state was very low at 3.5%. Subsequently, the state's GDP growth rate has improved significantly, rising to 8%during 2010–11 and 12% during 2011–12.

135. The state has an agrarian economy. The major crops of Madhya Pradesh are wheat, soybean, gram, sugarcane, rice, maize, cotton, rapeseed, mustard, and arhar. Minor forest produce (MFP), such as tendu leaves used to roll beedi, sal seed, teak seed, and lak also contribute to state's rural economy.

136. Madhya Pradesh has 5 Special Economic Zones (SEZs) comprised of 3 IT/ITeS (Indore,Gwalior), 1 mineral-based (Jabalpur) and 1 agro-based (Jabalpur). In October 2011, approvalwas given to 14 proposed SEZs, out of which 10 were IT/ITeS-based. Indore is the majorcommercial center of the state. Because of the state's central location, a number of consumergoods companies have established manufacturing bases in MP.

137. Madhya Pradesh has 6 Ordnance Factories, 4 of which are located at Jabalpur (VehicleFactory, Grey Iron Foundry, Gun Carriage Factory, Ordnance Factory Khamaria) and one eachat Katni and Itarsi. The factories are run by the Ordnance Factories Board, and manufacture a variety of products for the Indian Armed Forces.

138. The state's tourism industry is growing, fuelled by wildlife tourism and a number of places of historical and religious significance. Sanchi and Khajuraho are frequently visited by tourists. Besides the major cities, Bhedaghat, Bhimbetka, Bhojpur, Maheshwar, Mandu, Orchha,Pachmarchi, Kanha, and Ujjain are also popular tourist destinations.

4. Agriculture

139. Agriculture is the mainstay of the State's economy and 74.73% of the people are rural. As much as 49% of the land area is cultivable. The main food crops are jowar (sorghum),wheat, rice and coarse millets such as kondo and kutki. Pulses (beans, lentils and peas) andgroundnuts (peanuts). Rice is preferred in the east where water is abundant while wheat is thestaple in the drier regions of western Madhya Pradesh which touch the great Thar Desert.Madhya Pradesh is the largest producer of soybean in India. Although overall productivity ofagriculture is quite low, oilseeds (linseed and sesame), cotton and sugarcane are 59

also grownhere. Madhya Pradesh has plenty of forest reserves, which are logged for teak, sal, bambooand salai which yields a resin used for incense and medicines.

5. Industry and Minerals

140. Madhya Pradesh has entered the era of high-tech industries such as electronics,telecommunications, automobiles etc. The state is producing optical fibre for telecommunicationneeds. A large number of automobile industries have been established at Pithampur nearIndore. Prominent industries in the public sector in the state are Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd.At Bhopal, Security Paper Mill at Hoshangabad, Bank Note Press at Dewas, Newsprint Factory at Nepanagar and Alkaloid Factory at Neemuch. Over 81.13 million metre cloth in thehandloom sector and 131.59 million meter cloth by power loom was manufactured. The cementproduction touched 11.24 million metric tonne during the period. An air cargo Complex, Indo-German Tool Room and an Inland Container Depot are being established at Pithampur. TheGovernment of India has proposed setting up of Special Economic Zone at Indore.

141. Aditya Birla group had developed a thermal power plant (Bina Power Supply Company Limited BPSCL), which is taken over by Jaiprakash Associates Limited. This 1000 MW (500MW each) producing power plant has brought about a revolution in social and economiccondition of the area. Along with the power plant Bina refinery is being induced by Bharat OmanRefineries Limited (BORL) investing about 10,300 crores ($ 1554 million). Madhya Pradesh is rich in mineral resources and is one of the eight leading mineral production states in India. Important mineralsfound in M.P. are coal and iron. High quality iron-ore is found in Bastar, Jabalpur and Gwalior. The country’s largest diamond mine situated at Panna near Khajuraho has recoverable reserves of one million carats. Other mineral deposits include high-grade limestone, dolomite, iron ore,manganese ore, copper, coal, rock phosphate and bauxite. The state is also the country’s only producer of the tin ore. M.P. stands fourth in year 2006-07 for production of important mineralsamongst all the states in India. About Rs. 6700 crores ($ 1011 millions). worth of minerals were produced in year2006-07 which was 17.42% more than previous year. As per quick estimate of year 2006-07,contribution of mining and quarrying industry is 4.82%. The State is famous for its traditionalhandicrafts and handloom cloths manufactured in Chanderi and Maheshwar.

6. Irrigation and Power

142. The net area under irrigation was 5.66 million hectare in the year 1999-00. Of this, 0.24 m.ha was under paddy, 3.40 m.ha under wheat, 1.08 m.ha under pulses, 0.32 m.ha under oilseeds, 0.19 m.ha under cotton, 0.23 m.ha under spices, 18 m.ha under fruits and vegetables and 0.55 m.ha under other crops. Government canals irrigate one million ha, non-government canals 1600 ha, tanks, 0.132 m.ha, wells 3.71 m.ha, and other sources irrigate 0.8 m. ha. 86. Madhya Pradesh is rich in low-grade coal suitable for power generation and also has immense potential of hydro-energy. Total installed power generation capacity in year 2000-2001 was 2900 M.W. There are eight hydroelectric power stations with 747.5 MW installed capacity.

143. A total of 50,271 out of 51806 villages had been electrified by 2000-2001. Power generation is 14023.7 m. kwh. The Government of M.P. has formed a joint venture (Narmada Hydro Electric Development Corporation) with National Hydro-Electric Power Corporation, a Government of India undertaking for execution of 1000 M.W. India Sagar Hydro-Electric Project and 520 M.W. Omkareshwar Hydro-Electric Power Project.

7. Archaeological and Historical Monuments

144. No archaeological and historical monument is located along the selected subproject road sections.

8. Sensitive Receptors

145. During the environmental and social screening survey, number of sensitive receptors such as school, temple etc. are located within the existing RoW. However no structure are going to be affected by the proposed road improvement works. The list of these structures are presented in Table 26. List of main villages and water bodies resources is presented in Table 27.

Table 25: Physical /Sensitive Features along the subproject roads Sl Chainage ( in Distance from center of Left or Right Receptor No Km) existing road (m) Kirhai-Ramgarh-Mukundpur Road 1 0.495 6.5 RHS Temple 2 0.500 6.5 LHS Temple 3 1.350 5.5 RHS Temple 4 5.700 10 RHS Temple 5 12.100 10 RHS Temple 6 12.200 10 LHS Temple 7 12.280 9.35 RHS Temple 8 18.300 6.35 LHS Temple 9 20.620 6.5 RHS Temple 10 22.980 10 LHS Temple 11 23.700 10 RHS Temple 12 23.800 LHS NCC Camp 13 24.050 5.5 RHS Temple 14 24.350 5.8 RHS Mosque 15 24.380 7 RHS Temple Temple 16 25.110 5 LHS (Boundary) 17 28.500 10 LHS Temple 18 29.350 6.5 RHS Temple 19 29.900 4.3 RHS Temple 20 33.250 4 RHS Temple 21 33.900 4.5 RHS Temple 22 34.150 4.5 RHS Temple 23 34.240 4.5 RHS Temple Jharkua Raigaon Karsara Road 1 0.000 5.5 Right Temple 2 0.050 7 Right Graveyard College 3 3.700 10 Left Boundary 4 6.300 10 Right Temple 5 6.350 10 Right Temple 6 10.300 9.8 Right Temple 7 10.600 9.9 Left Mosque 8 10.800 3.5 Left Temple 9 11.000 12 Left School 10 12.300 14 Right School 61

Sl Chainage ( in Distance from center of Left or Right Receptor No Km) existing road (m) Temple 11 15.680 10 Right Boundary 12 16.200 9.5 Right Temple 13 16.200 9.5 Left Temple 14 19.200 9.9 Left Graveyard 15 19.700 3.5 Right Temple 16 20.000 10 Left Temple 17 21.150 7.5 Left Temple 18 21.300 10 Right Hospital 19 21.500 10 Right Temple Bhatura Bhadpur Barrakhurd Road 1 7.520 7 Right Temple 2 10.800 10 Left Temple 3 13.700 10 Right Temple 4 15.900 8 Left Temple 5 18.910 8 Left Temple 6 19.150 8 Left Temple Parsona Mada Road 1 4.200 13.00 L Temple 2 4.900 6.00 L Temple Anganwadi 3 7.300 7.9 R Centre 4 8.450 9.50 R Temple 5 8.700 8.50 R Temple 6 9.200 7.5 R School 7 9.300 9.5 R School 8 11.450 12.00 R Temple 9 12.000 10.00 L Temple 10 12.200 16.00 R Temple 11 12.950 9.00 L Temple 12 13.300 8.50 R Temple 13 14.200 18.00 L Temple Anganwadi 14 18.200 12 L Centre 15 22.600 25 R School 16 23.000 12.00 R Temple 17 23.400 25.00 R Temple 18 26.600 4.00 L Temple Ramgarh Mada Road 1 0.82 10 Left Temple 2 6.65 5 Left Temple Harphari Khaira Misirgawan via Shivpurva Road 1 9.300 6.5 Right Temple 2 12.600 8.5 Left Temple 3 14.780 10 Left Temple 4 18.200 8 Left Temple 5 19.300 9 Left Chabootara 6 24.800 9 Left Temple 7 25.500 8 Left Chabootara 8 25.700 7 Left Temple 9 25.990 8 Right Chabootara

Sl Chainage ( in Distance from center of Left or Right Receptor No Km) existing road (m) 1 9.300 6.5 Right Temple 2 12.600 8.5 Left Temple 3 14.780 10 Left Temple 4 18.200 8 Left Temple 5 19.300 9 Left Chabootara 6 24.800 9 Left Temple 7 25.500 8 Left Chabootara 8 25.700 7 Left Temple 9 25.990 8 Right Chabootara Chitrangi-Garhwa Road 1 0.876 5 Right Temple 2 1.124 7 Left School 3 1.445 5 Left Temple 4 16.705 6 Right Temple 5 17.122 6 Left School 6 17.990 7 Left Temple Anuppur Jaitpur Road No any Sensitive receptors along the road Gohparu Rasmohni Budhar (via Bathiya) Road 1 1.100 15.0 LHS Temple 2 1.500 28.0 LHS Temple 3 5.000 20.0 RHS Hospital 4 6.000 4.8 LHS Temple 5 6.300 8.0 RHS Temple 6 8.900 13.0 RHS Temple 7 14.500 13.0 LHS Temple 8 15.600 8.0 LHS Temple 9 17.400 8.0 LHS Temple 10 24.300 10.0 LHS Temple 11 33.900 30.0 LHS Temple 12 41.000 8.0 RHS Temple 13 41.300 5.0 RHS Temple 14 1.100 15.0 LHS Temple 15 1.500 28.0 LHS Temple 16 5.000 20.0 RHS Hospital 17 6.000 4.8 LHS Temple 18 6.300 8.0 RHS Temple Pasgarhi Devri Janakpur Raod 1 1450 11 LHS Temple 2 6900 10 LHS School 3 6950 12 RHS Temple 4 10775 8 LHS School 5 13650 9 LHS School 6 17000 12 RHS School 7 17850 14 LHS School 8 17855 10 RHS School 9 17950 11 RHS School 10 17960 10 LHS Hospital Jurai-Sarai Road 1 4.750 16.0 RHS School 2 12.950 25.0 RHS School 63

Sl Chainage ( in Distance from center of Left or Right Receptor No Km) existing road (m) 3 20.570 10.0 LHS School 4 20.630 10.5 LHS School 5 21.070 12.0 LHS Temple 6 21.800 23.0 RHS School 7 23.200 20.0 LHS Temple 8 24.950 10.0 RHS School 9 31.220 18.0 RHS Temple Sohagpur Manpur Road 1 6700 8 LHS School 2 8500 10 LHS School 3 8520 15 LHS School 4 16250 12 LHS School 5 17930 8 LHS Temple 6 21200 18 LHS School 7 21500 12 LHS Hospital 8 21950 16 RHS School 9 22150 19 LHS Hospital 10 40450 20 LHS School 11 41400 12 LHS Temple 12 46300 15 LHS School 13 48000 14 LHS School 14 48050 12 LHS School 15 48100 18 LHS School 16 48650 12 LHS Temple 17 52800 20 RHS Hospital 18 52550 16 RHS Hospital 19 53125 9 LHS Temple 20 54850 10 LHS School

Table 26: List of Key Villages and Water Bodies along the subproject roads Road Section Location (if available) Water bodies (Pond/ Rivers etc. ) Kirhai, Obra tola, Deori, One minor river cross at Km 8.5 Kharamseda Gora, Ramgarh, Canal crossings at Km 11.500, 27.000 &32.00 Kirhai Ramgarh Bichhiyakhurd, Bhandra Several seasonl nallahs/ drain crossings water pipeline crossing at km 9.100 and , Pond at Km 9.8 and Km 9.9 Jharkua Raigaon Devra Bhatta, Shivpur, Karsara Raigaon, etama, Karsara minor river on LHS at Km 8.000 Crossing of two small streams at Km 10.500 & 16.500 Bhatura Bhadpur Barroh, Salaiya, Ajmain, Two nala crossing the alignment Barrakhurd Gharewai, Bhatura Two (Lauwa and Gurra river crossing at Km Karahiya, Khutar, Batauli, 10.6,m at Km 13.4 Parsona Mada Jarha, Rajmilan, Rampa, Koyla khunth, Mada town Three seasonal in nallah Crossing

Minor Drain/ River Crossing at Km 0.82, 1.4, Ramgarh Mada Jeer & Mada 6.2, 9.0, 12.2 and 16.05 ( Seasonal in nature )

Road Section Location (if available) Water bodies (Pond/ Rivers etc. ) Minor Stream/ River (Seasonal) Crossing at Km Harphari Khaira Hfana, Dhani, Korsar, 1.6, 1.7, 6.5, 15.4, 24.7 & 26.8 Misirgawan via Mudrpali, Bharut, Dharauli Shivpurva Pond at km 19.8 Chitrangi, Lalmati village Chitrangi-Garhwa ,Duara, Ghoghra, Logahi 63 Nalas(Non perineal). Road ,Mohgadi and Badgada Rampur, Dongariya tola, River Jamuna at Km 13.580 , Nagdaha at Km Sindhli, Karrawan, 20.06 , Kaser at Km 25.415, Karhar at Km Anuppur Jaitpur Chokodiya, Kotri, Katma, 26.105, Kunak at Km 34.935 Jaitpur Four nalah crossing the alignment Gohparu Budhar, Pakrariya, River sone at Km 7.335 Rasmohni Channoudi, Bahgarh/ Budhar (via Kalantoa , Lakhan Toal, Six nalah crossing the alignment Bathiya) Bhatiya, Rasmohni Deori, Bandhatola, River sone at Km 21.625 Pasgarhi Devri Nakuni, Rampurwa, Janakpur Budwa/Majhigawan Three nalah crossing the alignment

Two river croosing named- Mahan at Km 13.8, Jhurai – Sarai Purani Deosar, Purail and Dhamad at Km 19.3 Five seasonal nalah crosing the alignment River Johilla at Km 41.600 & janar at Km Bakeli, Vautra, Chauri, Sohagpur – 45.550 Khulhari village, Chhapra, Manpur Bijauri, Kathar Eight nalah crossing the alignment

V. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

A. Introduction

146. This chapter presents key environmental issues associated with various aspects of the proposed subprojects. The environmental impacts caused due to the development of the subproject road sections can be categorised as primary (direct) and secondary (indirect) impacts. Primary impacts are those which are induced directly by the project where as the secondary impacts are those which are indirectly induced and typically include the associated investment and changing patterns of social and economic activities due to the proposed action. Interaction of the project activities with environmental attributes is presented as Activity-Impact matrix in Table 28.

Table 27: Activity-Impact Identification Matrix Sl. Activities Type of Impact No. Air Water Noise Flora Fauna Drainage Soil Topography 1. Labour camp - ve/t activities 2. Quarrying -ve/t - ve/t - ve/t - ve/t - ve/p 3. Material transport and - ve/t - ve/t storage 4. Drilling, blasting and - ve/t - ve/t - ve/t - ve/t hill cutting 5. Earthwork - ve/p - ve/t - ve/t 6. Payment works - ve/t - ve/t - ve/t - ve/t - ve/t - ve/p 7. Use of construction - ve/t - ve/t - ve/t - ve/t equipments 8. Plantation - ve/p - ve/p - ve/p 9. Drainage work - ve/p 10. Culvert and bridge - ve/t - ve/t - ve/p construction 11. Stripping of top soil - ve/p 12. Debris generation - ve/t - ve/t 13. Oil and grease - ve/t 14. Construction in forest - ve/t - ve/t - ve/t - ve/t - ve/t - ve/p - ve/p - ve/p and sensitive areas Notes: t – temporary, p – permanent. Impact indicated in bold letters indicates significant impacts.

147. Identification and assessment of the potential environmental impacts are based on secondary information supplemented by field visits. Impacts on various environmental components have been assessed at four different stages, namely: (i) the project location; (ii) design and pre-construction; (iii) construction; and (iv) operation stages.

148. A few permanent as well as short-term and long-term adverse effects, mainly at the construction and operation stages, are, nonetheless, anticipated. Temporary short-term impacts

can be kept in check through proper planning and adopting environment friendly road construction methods and the appropriate regulatory measures.

B. Positive Environmental Impacts due to improvement of subproject road sections

149. The positive impacts expected from the improvement of the subproject road sections includes:

(a) improved quality of life for the rural population in the projects influence area: this as a result of better access to markets, health, education and other facilities; and the derived stimulus for local economic activity; (b) a more efficient and safe road transport system: through reduced travel times, reduced road accidents, reduced vehicle operating and maintenance costs and reduced transportation costs for goods; (c) the facilitation of tourism; (d) Interstate connectivity to to Satna, Rewa, Sidhi, Umaria, Shahdol, Anuppur and Singrauli districts; and (e) Better connectivity to the State Highway and National Highway network.

C. Adverse Environmental Impacts due to improvement of subproject road sections

150. The adverse environmental impacts anticipated from the improvement of the project road section are:

(a) Loss of productive soil and agriculture land, (b) Cutting of road side trees that falls within formation width i.e. 10m may reduce the ecological balance of the area and also increase soil erosion problem. (c) Noise, air and water pollution and disposal of construction waste, during construction, will adversely impact both local residents. These latter effects should, however, only be temporary/reversible. (d) A number of quarries and other sources will be established which will change the landscape. However, the operation of quarries is an independent and already regulated activity. Adverse impacts on water quality of rivers crossing or running parallel to the proposed alignments (Lauwa and Gurra rivers on Parsona-Mada road, Mahan and Dhamad Rivers on Jhurai-Sarai road, other local stream/rivers) in the form of silt deposition and runoff during construction are expected. However, this is short term and will be taken care of by controlled construction activities. (e) Improvement on existing road and construction of new road and bridges, although limited, may enhance soil erosion, landslips and reduce the micro-level ecological balance of the area. Construction may also disturb the habitation of fauna living in this area. These should, however, be only temporary/reversible effects. The improvement will also require the cutting of about 3378 trees. (f) Noise and air quality for those now living and workings close to the subproject roads (mainly at urban centers) will deteriorate during the construction period and afterwards during operation.

D. Impacts Related to Project Location, Preliminary Planning and Design

1. Forest Clearing and Tree Felling

151. Most of the subproject roads are passing through plain terrain with land use being agriculture. However three road sections (in Singrauli district) are passing through reserve forest areas of Madhya Pradesh State. About 16.5 km (73 percent) of the road length of Ramgarh-Mada road, 12.5 (35 percent) road lengths of Jhurai-Sarai road , 4.8 km (18 percent) of Harfari Khaira-Misirgawan road and 6.6 Km (29 percent) Chitrangi-Garhwa road are passing through forest areas. Although diversion of forest land is not envisaged adverse impacts are anticipated due to land clearing which will involve cutting of about 3378 trees. Problem of soil erosion is expected in some locations. To minimize loss of trees, the following mitigation measures have been adopted.during the detailed design and these will be implemented during construction stage of the subproject roads:

(a) Widening proposal considered option with minimal tree cutting. (b) Widening is restricted to minimum width in the length passing through forest areas. (c) Adequate measures are included in the design to minimize any unforeseen impacts on flora and fauna in the forest areas. (d) Land stabilization measures were included in identified areas prone to erosion. (e) Strictly enforce the environmental conditions put as part of the forest clearance and no objection certificates issued by the Forest Department and SPCB. (f) Adopting Environmental Friendly Road Construction (EFRC) methods such as proper planning, design, implementation, monitoring, controlled execution of activities, use of latest machineries and equipments, bio-engineering etc.

152. Based on the tree inventory carried out during the field surveys in second quarter of 2016, the total number of trees to be cleared along eleven selected subproject road sections are 3378. The main species of trees to be cut are local species namely Mahua (Madhuca Longifolia), Pipal (Ficus religiosa), Jamun (Syzygium Cumin), Sarai (Shorea robusta), Chola (Cicer arietinum), Babool (Acacia arabica, Willd.), Aam (Mangifera indica), Sagon (Tectona grandis Linn.), Chirol (Holoptelea integrifolia), and Neem (Azadirachta indica). Table 29 present details of the trees to be cut due to proposed road improvement work. As per compensatory afforestation requirement, the tree plantation will be done ten times of tree cutting (1:10 of tree cutting). At sensitive locations such as schools and temples along the project roadssuitable noise barrier shall need to be provided.

153. The compensatory plan will be developed in consultation with local forest department. As per compensatory afforestation, the tree plantation will be done ten times of tree cutting (1:10 of tree cutting) as detailed in Table 29.

Table 28: Road wise Detail of Trees to be cut and planted Tree Proposed S. Length Name of Road to be tree to be No. (Km) cut planted 1 Kharamseda Kirhai Ramgarh Road 34.35 242 2420 2 Jharkua Raigaon Karsara Road 23.95 455 4550 3 Bhatura Bhadpur Barrakhurd Road 20.05 244 2440 4 Parsona Mada Road 24.39 54 540

Tree Proposed S. Length Name of Road to be tree to be No. (Km) cut planted 5 Ramgarh Mada Road 19.87 376 3760 Harphari Khaira Misirgawan via Shivpurva 6 25.99 Road 586 5860 7 Chitrangi-Garhwa Road 22.67 254 2540 8 Anuppur Jaitpur Road 36.66 404 4040 Gohparu Rasmohni Budhar (via Bathiya) 9 39.94 Road 264 2640 10 Pasgarhi Devri Janakpur Road 23.49 222 2220 11 Jhurai – Sarai Road 31.44 80 800 12 Sohagpur – Manpur Road 59.40 197 1970 Total 362.20 3378 33780 Source: Field Survey carried out by the Consultant Team Note: The exact number of trees to be cut might vary from these figures. Joint inspection with forest range officers shall be carried out to estimate the number and type of trees to be cut by improvement proposals. In case of any change, numbers will be updated and accordingly compensatory plan be updated.

2. Construction Camps, Borrow Pits and Quarries

154. There is a need to establish construction camps and related facilities, such as borrow pits and quarries. These must be located in environmentally sound and socially safe areas. It is expected that construction materials for the road works will be mined mostly from approved quarries. The following criteria is applied for locating the borrow areas:

(a) Borrow areas are not established in ecologically sensitive areas; (b) Villagers are consulted in regard to the design and location of all borrow areas – these should ensure the safety of local communities and, if possible, should incorporate beneficial post construction features for the villages; (c) Located away from the road and hill slopes as well as settlements facing the road, so as to minimise visual impacts; (d) In case of protected areas/ reserve forest areas, construction facilities such as temporary workers camp, hot mix plants, and concrete batching plant and stone crushers should not be established in stretches that passes through reserve / protected forests. Local forest department / village forest management committees should be consulted before locating these temporary subproject facilities; (e) Construction camps for labourers should be located at least 500 m away from settlements and 1 km away from forest/protected areas; (f) Living accommodation and ancillary facilities should be erected and maintained to standards and scales approved by the Engineer-in-Charge; and (g) Toilets and urinals should be provided in accessible places away from the asphalt plant and mixing yard.

3. Cultural Heritage

155. There are no adverse impacts anticipated on historical places/monuments. However, there are few temples and small shrines along the roads. Care must be taken to avoid any damage to these structures. Earthworks, as associated with the road construction/improvement 69

works, or deriving from secondary sites such as quarries or borrow pits, may reveal sites or artifacts of cultural/archaeological significance. In the event of such discovery, the concerned authorities should be informed and the requirement to take such action should be incorporated in contract documents.

4. Other Impacts deriving from the Project Planning and Design Process

156. During preliminary planning and design of the subproject roads, the Consultant has taken into account the need for:

 optimum sitting and control of borrow areas;  reduced incidence of slope failures due to inadequate drainage;  providing adequate culverts/drains;  providing side-drainage structures;  mechanised construction methods and thereby, for example, reduced use of firewood for heating bitumen;  maximising safety and thereby reducing traffic accidents;  reducing travel times and, thereby, fuel consumption and emissions;  adequate signages for wildlife protections,  increased accessibility for residents to education and health facilities, markets etc., and for others who might come for tourist or other purposes; and  improving the socio-economic conditions of residents in the project areas of influence.

157. As part of the engineering works for this work, the following guiding principles have been used in determining the alignments:

Environmental Issue Measures taken Alignment Final alignment has been determined so as to minimise land take, tree removal, air pollution and the impact on people and animals and to avoid unfavourable geological condition and cultural relics. Balancing cut and fill The design attempted to equalise cut and fill. The centreline has been aligned so that on all slopes below 60 degrees, half cut and half fill is achieved. Soil erosion Temporary and permanent drainage systems have been designed to minimise the soil erosion. Dust and air pollution Borrow sites, waste disposal sites and asphalt mixing sites have been identified – keeping in mind environmental issues such as dust. Cultural heritage Any archaeological sites identified along the alignment should be excavated prior to construction. Wildlife Habitat Care has been taken in preservation of wildlife and construction workers should be educated on wildlife protection.

E. Environmental Impacts - Construction Stage

1. Permits and Clearances

158. As a requirement of Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006, by Government of India, any development activities should not be taken in any part of the Country unless it has granted environmental clearance by the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.

159. Highways are classified as one of the project, listed in said notification, which require prior clearance. However, an amendment to this notification clarifies, that the highway improvement projects are excluded from purview of this notification. Also major district roads are not required to comply with the Environmental Protection Act and Rules 1986 and the EIA notification (2006, 2009, 2011) and relevant amendments. Hence, the roads under this sector project are not required to obtain environmental clearances and prepare environmental assessment reports under national laws. Some of the relevant applicable sections are:

(i) Since the proposed subproject interventions are primarily limited to the improvement of existing major district roads and the alignments of the subproject roads does not pass through any environmentally sensitive areas, therefore it does not falls under the purview of Notification no. S.O. 195(E) dated 19 January 2009 by the Ministry of Environment and Forests on amendment to the EIA Notification. Also major district roads are not required to comply with the Environmental Protection Act and Rules 1986 and the EIA notification (2006, 2009, 2011) and relevant amendments. Hence, the roads under subprojects are not required to obtain environmental clearances and prepare environmental assessment reports under national laws. (ii) As per the Forest Conservation Rules (1981, amended 2003) a forestry clearance from Department of Forests is required for diversion of forest land for non-forest purpose. Processing of the forestry clearance entails two stages: stage I and stage II. Amongst other requirements stage I clearance requires the applicant to make payments for compensation of forestry land that will be acquired and trees that will be cut under the project. Accordingly timely allocation of budget for this purpose by the applicant is necessary to expedite the clearance process. Since the improvement of the proposed subprojects is restricted to the available ROW, diversion of forest land is not required. Therefore forest clearance is not required for proposed subprojects. (iii) Cutting of trees in non forest land require a tree cutting permit from the local forestry department. All trees cut under a project must be compensated by compensatory afforestation as required by the Forest Department. (iv) As per Office Memorandum (OM) issued by MOEF on 19 March 2013 the grant of environmental clearance for linear projects including roads has been delinked from the forestry clearance procedure. Hence, after receipt of environmental clearance construction works may commence on sections/parts of a linear project that do not require forestry clearance. Construction works may commence on sections requiring forestry clearance only after receipt of the respective clearance. (v) Placement of hot-mix plants, quarrying and crushers, batch mixing plants, discharge of sewage from construction camps requires No Objection Certificate (Consent to Establish and Consent to Operate) from State Pollution Control Board prior to establishment. 71

(vi) Permission from Central Ground Water Authority is required for extracting ground water for construction purposes, from areas declared as critical or semi critical from ground water potential prospective by them.

160. Before the start of civil works for any section of subproject the project proponent (MPRDC/State PWD) must obtain necessary clearances / permits from the forest department and Madhya Pradesh State Pollution Control Board. Table 30 outlines the applicable clearances and permits and the authorised bodies that issue them along with the procedures involved. The status of the permits / clearances has also been presented in this table.

Table 29: Clearances and Permits Required for the Subprojects S. Permissions/ Concerned Responsibility / No. Clearances Agency time required A. Pre-constructionStage 1 Permission for cutting of District Forest Office/ State Forest MPRDC / 3-6 trees Department for trees felling in months forest areas and District Authorities in non-forests Areas (Compensatory tree plantation to be made 1:10 as per the permission granted) B. ImplementationStage 2 Consent to operate hot mix M.P. State Pollution Control Board Contractor / 3-6 plant, Crushers, Batching (To be obtained before installation) months plant 3 Authorization for M.P. State Pollution Control Board Contractor / 3-6 Disposal of hazardous (To be obtained before generation) months waste 4 Consent for Disposal of M.P. State Pollution Control Board Contractor / 3-6 sewage from labor camps (Before setting up the camp) months 5 Pollution Under Control Department of Transport, Contractor /1-2 Certificate Government of M.P. authorized month 6 Employing testingDistrict centersLabour Contractor /1-2 Labour/Workers Commissioner month

161. Any felling of trees requires forestry clearance and appropriate permits. The procedures necessary to obtain such permits will require liaison with local territorial forestry offices and their head office in district headquarters. Joint verification and making of trees to be cut is being carried out jointly with divisional forest departments of districts involved. No clearance is required for the use of surface sand and stone from the river banks as for commercial purposes they can only be purchased in an open auction carried out by the forestry office. It is imperative that all necessary clearances and permits be obtained before commencement of work.

2. Physical Environment

a. Topography, Geology and Soil

162. During the improvement works for the road sections, the cutting of hill slope, filling, the cutting of trees, stone quarrying, and construction of structures, the micro-level topography may

change. With proper planning, these topographical impacts can be kept within acceptable limits and sometimes even used to enhance local aesthetics. Any negative impacts on topography (existing), particularly soil erosion due to a lack of drainage facilities, will be minimized with the provision of proper drainage facilities such as culverts, causeways etc.

163. The terrain and geological conditions of areas are such that, even with reasonable care exercised during final design, during construction the interaction between proposed road features and existing land features may reveal/result in some land instabilities.

164. During the construction phase following restrictions should be imposed:

 existing vegetation including shrubs and grasses along the roads (except within the strip directly under embankments or cuttings) should be properly maintained;  sites for quarrying, borrowing and disposal of spoils are to be confirmed according to the applicable laws and regulations in the state and the practices followed in recent/ongoing internationally funded road projects should be continued;  controlled and environmentally friendly quarrying techniques should be applied to minimise erosions; and  cut material should be disposed of in suitable depressions.

165. It is also important to:

 maintain adequate vegetative cover above and below the roads;  maintain the natural course of water bodies (that is as far as possible) and avoid throwing debris into stream courses;  construct proper drainage structures to avoid erosion; and  minimise the construction of hair-pin bends that are close to each other: as this often adds to instability.

b. Erosion and Silt Run-Off

166. All activities will occur within the available RoW, no adverse environmental impact is anticipated on the productive soil. Lands taken on lease for access road and for construction camp will be restored its original land use.

167. Land clearing and grubbing activities will remove vegetation and soil cover which may cause some soil erosion during monsoon. Excavations in borrow pits may lead to loss of top soil and soil erosion. There are risks of stream and river bank erosion near bridges and cross drainage works. To avoid or minimize erosion, land clearing and grubbing will be conducted during dry season, productive top soils from borrow pits will be stored and reused in road embankment slope protection. Erosion control measures like silt screens will be installed along rivers and nallahs (small local streams).

168. There is the risk of contamination of soil from construction material and oil spills. Contractors are required to ensure proper handling materials and able to implement spills containment. Oil contaminated waste will be properly collected, stored disposed through 3rd party service providers. All fuel and lubricant storage and handling areas will be located at least 500 meters from the nearest water body and provided with perimeter interceptor drains. All construction debris will disposed by the Contractor on predesignated area as identified by the CSC-Environmental Specialist. 73

c. Climate

169. The proposed improvement/construction works will be localised activities and the subprojects will not have significant impact on climatic conditions, such as rainfall, temperature and humidity in the project area. A climate change impact and risk analysis has been carried out using TEEMP model (Chapter 6: Climate Change Impact and Risks) and appropriate adaptation measures are incorporated in the subprojects design.

d. Surface and Ground Water, Drainage and Hydrology

170. Given the presence of rivers and streams in the subproject areas and some of them crossing and /or running parallel to subproject roads; improvement of road may result in disruptions to the natural hydrology and water mismanagement and lead to further problems of soil erosion.

171. The natural courses of rivers/streams will be maintained. Appropriate temporary diversions of streams will be made and brought back to their natural course as soon works are completed in that section. No disposal of construction debris in streams and rivers is allowed.

172. Minor impacts on water resources are expected during the construction phase. The rehabilitation of existing bridges may also cause soil erosion and turbidity in downstream water bodies. To mitigate this, river-bank slope stabilities will be monitored and, if necessary, appropriate remedial measures applied throughout the construction period. Construction work at bridges during rainy season will be minimized to avoid erosion and sedimentation.

173. The likely impacts of surface water movements are changes in the natural drainage systems, downstream scour, and erosion due to constriction in flows. If suspended solid concentrations in the water are affected, this could also affect aquatic river ecology. However since there are no perennial water bodies across the selected subprojects. The work will be carried out in dry seasons. Hence, impacts on river ecology will be negligible.

174. To mitigate these impacts the following measures should be implemented:  chemicals and oils are stored in secure, impermeable containers, and disposed of well away from surface waters;  no vehicle cleaning activity is allowed within 300 m of water bodies/ drains;  construction camps are equipped with sanitary latrines that do not pollute surface waters;  the work on bridges and culverts is limited to dry seasons, when many of the smaller streams will have low water - water diversion works can be minimised and the original course restored immediately after the work has been completed;  drivers are made aware of diversions and other works at bridge construction site to avoid accidents;  drainage structures are properly designed to accommodate forecast discharges;  side drain waters must be discharged at every available stream crossing to minimize volume and prevent erosion at discharge point;  provide lined drainage structures;  where an increased discharge of surface water endangers the stability of the water outlet, erosion protection measures such as bioengineering measures, ripraps, and check dams are incorporated;  in areas with high water tables, seepage may occur and side drains and up-slope catch drains must always been lined to avoid percolation; and

 all debris and vegetation, clogging culverts are regularly cleared.

175. Ground water pollution is not envisaged in these subprojects.

e. Air Quality

176. During construction air quality may be degraded for short periods due to (i) the exhaust emissions from the operation of construction machinery; (ii) fugitive emissions from concrete and asphalt plants; (iii) the dust generated from the haulage of materials, exposed soils and material stockpiles; (iv) cleaning of the road; (v) material loading; (vi) unloading; and (vii) blasting activities (if any). The impact is expected to be localised, temporary and confined to construction areas.

177. Adverse air quality impacts during construction are likely to result from three main sources; (i) emissions from construction equipment, including delivery trucks; (ii) fugitive dust from earth-moving operations and demolition; and (iii) localised increased traffic congestion in construction areas.

178. The adverse impacts on air quality during construction stage were classified and presented in Table 31. There are two types of pollution i.e. dust pollution and pollution from harmful gases.

Table 30: Impact on Air Quality during Construction Stage Sl. No. Impact Source 1. Generation  Transportation and tipping of cut material - while the former will of Dust occur over the entire stretch between the cutting location and (SPM) disposal site, the latter is more location specific and more intense;  Blasting operations;  Transportation of raw materials from quarries and borrow sites;  Stone crushing, handling and storage of aggregates in asphalt plants;  Site levelling, clearing of trees, laying of asphalt, construction of bridges;  Concrete batching plants;  Asphalt mix plants – due to the mixing of aggregates with bitumen; and  Construction of structures and allied activities. 2. Generation  Hot mix plants; of polluting  Large construction equipment, trucks and asphalt producing and gases paving equipment; including  The movement of heavy machinery, oil tankers etc. on steep SO2, NOx slopes will cause much higher emissions of gases; and HC  Toxic gases released through the heating process during bitumen production; and  Inadequate vehicle maintenance and the use of adulterated fuel in vehicles.

179. On the proposed subprojects road sections, it is expected that air quality will be affected to some minor extent by dust and particulate matters generated by construction, vehicular movements, site clearance, earth filling and material loading and unloading. The impacts are 75

expected to be localised, temporary and confined to construction areas. Care should, however, be taken at sensitive urban locations so that harmful impacts can be minimised.

f. Air Quality Modelling and Prediction of Impacts

180. In order to assess the likely concentrations at the critical locations along the subproject road corridors, the prediction of the pollutant concentrations has been carried out for a sample subproject using CALINE-4, a dispersion model based on Gaussian Equation. Since the road sections considered proposed in MPMRD II project are major district roads, the increase in traffic is very low and mostly identical to all proposed road sections. Therefore a sample road has been selected to rum the model to check on likely increase in concentrations on project road sections. Considering the currect and projected traffic volume Dharna-Dharmkuwa Road road section in Seoni District measuring 26.23 km (which has highest traffic among the proposed road sections/ subprojects) has been selected for prediction of air quality. The input parameters for the prediction are detailed in subsequent paragraphs.

181. CALINE-4 is a dispersion model based on Gaussian equation. It is developed by the California Department of Transportation for the prediction of concentrations of critical atmospheric pollutants (CO, NOx and PM10) along the highways. This model employs a mixing zone concept to characterize pollutant dispersion over the highway and can be used to predict the pollutant concentrations for receptors upto 500 m of the corridor. The model uses the baseline data on existing concentration of pollutants and estimates the incremental emissions due to the project.

182. Various input parameters for the prediction of pollutant concentrations are discussed below:

 Traffic Data: The fleet wise traffic volumes for the present study have been taken from the detailed feasibility report of the project. The annual averagedaily traffic (AADT)data is available for the proposed roadthrough traffic survey. CALINE 4 model needs hour average traffic volume. However, model has been setup for peak traffic hours assuming 25%of average daily traffic volume. The total traffic hour volume is further categorized in to two wheeler, four wheeler, Light commercial vehicles (LCVs), Bus and high commercial vehicles (HCVs), based on the traffic survey at existing road. The annual average daily motorized traffic data along with future traffic growth is given below.

2 3 4 Year LCV HCV Buses wheeler wheeler wheeler 2016 1177 521 329 91 148 98 2020 1703 754 481 131 211 140 2025 2174 964 615 168 265 178 2030 2775 1231 783 214 338 227 2035 3543 1572 1000 273 429 289 2040 4521 2008 1277 349 548 369 2047 6362 2825 1800 489 771 517

 Road Geometry: In the CALINE-4 model the entire length of the selected road section is divided into various road links. The division of sections into links has been done in such way, so that the link can be fairly considered as straight stretch of road having homogenous geometry with uniform road width, height and

alignment. The coordinates of end points of links specify the location of the links in the model. The maximum numbers of link in each road section can be 20. The mixing zone width calculated for selected highway corridor is 13 m (3 m+ 3 m + 7 m) as per guideline provided in CALINE4 model.

 Emission Factors: Emission factor is one of the important input parameterin Caline-4 model. In the present study, the emission factors specified by the Automotive Research Association of India (ARAI, 2007) have been used for calculation of weighted emissionfactors. These emission factors have been expressed in terms of type of vehicles and type of fuel used (for petrol and diesel driven passenger cars). Since, there is only one input requirement for total no. of vehicles in the CALINE 4 model, whereas, there are different categories of vehicles (viz., Two wheelers, Cars, Bus and trucks) with different year of manufacture and fuel used, it is essential that a single value representing the equivalent or weighted emission factors for all the vehicles is input into the model. The emission factor used to estimate WEF are given below in table 31. The traffic data are not available for fuel types, therefore average emission factor are used in this study. Thus, WEF expressed in g/mile (converted from gm/km) has been calculated for the present study using methodology given by Sharma et al., 2013.

For PM10, emission from re-suspension of road dust of paved road have been estimated using following empirical equation (USEPA 2011).

E = k (sL) 0.91 × (W)1.02

Where: E= particulate emission factor (g/VKT) K =particle size multiplier (g/VKT), default value of “k” for PM2.5 is 0.15 g/VKT sL = road surface silt loading (g/m2) = 0.531 g/m2 (Sahu et al., 2011) W = Average weight of vehicles (in tons) on road = 1.41 Ton (Sahu et al., 2011)

The emission factor for CO, and PM2.5 used in the present study for different vehicles type are given in table 31. The calculated WEF for CO, PM2.5 and PM10 for peaktraffic hours is given in table 32.

Table 31: Emission factors for different types of Vehicle (ARAI, 2007) Pollutants 2W 3W 4W LCV HCV Bus CO 3.08 2.50 1.53 2.02 12.65 8.40 PM2.5 0.2 0.235 0.057 0.49 1.6 1.08 PM10 0.21 0.25 0.07 0.50 1.61 1.09

Table 32: Weighted Emission Factor for proposed traffic Weighted Emission Weighted Weighted Emission factor for Emission factor Year factor for CO (g/mile) PM2.5(g/mile) for PM10(g/mile) 2016 5.67 0.52 0.55 2020 5.65 0.52 0.54 2025 5.63 0.52 0.54 2030 5.63 0.52 0.54 2035 5.62 0.51 0.54 77

2040 5.63 0.51 0.54 2047 5.62 0.51 0.54

 Meteorological data: The study was conducted to predict pollutant concentration for worst meteorological conditions. The meteorological parameters such as wind speed, wind direction standard deviation, temperature, mixing height and stability condition are used in model. The wind direction standard deviation was calculated to know the flexibility of wind direction and used as input parameters in worst case run condition. The model has been run with worst case, in which models predicted maximum pollutant concentration.

 Receptors: A set of link receptors were taken at various receptor locations within each section ata distance of 5 m, 10 m, 20 m, 40 m, 70m, 100 m and200 m both sides from edge of the carriageway to know the dispersion of pollutant from the road. The monitoring station are marked as receptor points to compare the monitoring and predicted pollutant concentrations.

183. Results: The model has been setup and run to predict hourly average CO, PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations for year 2016, year 2020, year 2025, year 2030, year 2035, year 2040 and year 2047 using forecasted traffic data on proposed road corridor. The predicted hourly average concentration of CO, PM2.5 and PM10 during peak traffic are shown in tables 33, 34, and 35 for proposed road development project, respectively at four selected receptor locations. The graphical representation of hourly average pollutant concentrations on both side of the road sections shown in figures 12, 13 and 14 at different locations.

Table 33: CO predicted concentrations (ppm) along the proposed road for peak traffic hour CO Concentrations (ppm) Year Distance from the edge of the road, m. (Left side) Distance from the edge of the road, m. (Right side) -200 -100 -70 -40 -20 -10 -5 5 10 20 40 70 100 200 2016 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.08 0.14 0.18 0.2 0.3 0.29 0.23 0.20 0.09 0.03 0.00 2020 0.04 0.04 0.08 0.16 0.28 0.37 0.4 0.5 0.48 0.38 0.34 0.15 0.05 0.05 2025 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.20 0.35 0.46 0.5 0.6 0.57 0.45 0.41 0.18 0.06 0.06 2030 0.06 0.06 0.12 0.24 0.42 0.55 0.6 0.7 0.67 0.53 0.48 0.21 0.07 0.07 2035 0.07 0.08 0.16 0.32 0.56 0.74 0.8 0.9 0.86 0.68 0.61 0.27 0.09 0.09 2040 0.08 0.09 0.18 0.36 0.63 0.83 0.9 1.1 1.05 0.83 0.75 0.33 0.11 0.10 2047 0.11 0.12 0.24 0.48 0.84 1.10 1.2 1.4 1.33 1.05 0.95 0.42 0.14 0.13

3 Table 34: PM2.5 predicted concentrations (µg/m ) along the proposed road for peak traffic hour 3 PM2.5 Concentrations (µg/m ) Year Distance from the edge of the road, m. (Left side) Distance from the edge of the road, m. (Right side) -200 -100 -70 -40 -20 -10 -5 5 10 20 40 70 100 200 2016 0.00 1.43 2.86 5.72 10.01 13.16 14.30 17.10 16.25 12.83 11.63 5.13 1.71 0.00 2020 1.95 2.12 4.24 8.48 14.84 19.50 21.20 24.30 23.09 18.23 16.52 7.29 2.43 2.31 2025 2.53 2.75 5.50 11.00 19.25 25.30 27.50 30.50 28.98 22.88 20.74 9.15 3.05 2.90 2030 3.24 3.52 7.04 14.08 24.64 32.38 35.20 38.10 36.20 28.58 25.91 11.43 3.81 3.62 2035 4.14 4.50 9.00 18.00 31.50 41.40 45.00 46.70 44.37 35.03 31.76 14.01 4.67 4.44 2040 4.97 5.40 10.80 21.60 37.80 49.68 54.00 57.70 54.82 43.28 39.24 17.31 5.77 5.48 2047 6.65 7.23 14.46 28.92 50.61 66.52 72.3 77 73.15 57.75 52.36 23.10 7.70 7.32

3 Table 35: PM10 predicted concentrations (µg/m ) along the proposed road for peak traffic hour 3 PM10 Concentrations (µg/m ) Year Distance from the edge of the road, m. (Left side) Distance from the edge of the road, m. (Right side) -200 -100 -70 -40 -20 -10 -5 5 10 20 40 70 100 200 2016 1.11 1.62 3.24 6.48 11.34 14.90 16.20 18.01 17.11 13.51 12.25 5.40 1.80 1.12 2020 2.12 2.30 4.60 9.20 16.10 21.16 23.00 25.20 23.94 18.90 17.14 7.56 2.52 2.39 2025 2.68 2.91 5.82 11.64 20.37 26.77 29.10 31.70 30.12 23.78 21.56 9.51 3.17 3.01 2030 3.33 3.62 7.24 14.48 25.34 33.30 36.20 39.22 37.26 29.42 26.67 11.77 3.92 3.73 2035 3.97 4.32 8.64 17.28 30.24 39.74 43.20 49.20 46.74 36.90 33.46 14.76 4.92 4.67 2040 5.35 5.82 11.64 23.28 40.74 53.54 58.20 61.10 58.05 45.83 41.55 18.33 6.11 5.80 2047 7.12 7.74 15.48 30.96 54.18 71.21 77.4 81.8 77.71 61.35 55.62 24.54 8.18 7.77 79

1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20

CO Concentration CO (ppm) 0.00 -250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 Distantance from edge of the road

2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2047

Figure 9: CO predicted concentrations (ppm) along the proposed Road

90.00 ) 80.00 70.00 µg/m3 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00

-250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 PM2.5 PM2.5 Concentration( Distantance from edge of the road

2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2047

3 Figure 10: PM2.5 predicted concentrations (µg/m ) along the proposed Road

90.00 ) 80.00 70.00 µg/m3 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00

-250 PM10 Concentration( -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 Distantance from edge of the road

2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2047

3 Figure 11: PM10 predicted concentrations (µg/m ) along the proposed Road

184. Table 36 describes the average baseline concentration (24 hour average) PM2.5 and PM10 monitored during selected period at different locations around the proposed road.

Table 36: Baseline pollutant concentration (µg/m3) at different locations

Location Name PM2.5 PM10 Dharna Village 22 58 Dharamkuva 20 55

185. In addition, the spatial distribution of hourly average predicted CO, PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations have been plotted in figures 15, 16 and 17 , respectively for peak traffic hour which shows that pollutant concentrations is decreasing when goes away from the road. From the CALINE4 modelling results, it is observed that maximum dispersion of pollutants concentration emitted from traffic volume at proposed road is up to 200 m. Therefore, the impacts of traffic movement at proposed roadvwill not impact the surrounding atmosphere.

Figure 12: Spatial distribution of CO concentrations

Year 2016

Year 2020 81

Year 2025

Year 2030

Year 2035

Year 2040

Year 2047

Figure 13: Spatial distribution of PM2.5 concentrations

Year 2016

Year 2020

Year 2025

Year 2030

Year 2035

Year 2040

Year 2047

Figure 14: Spatial distribution of PM10 concentrations

2016

Year 2020

Year 2025

Year 2030

Year 2035 87

Year 2040

Year 2047

186. It has been observed from the model output that when the traffic volume increases, the concentration of air pollutants also increases correspondingly. The maximum predicted pollutant concentrations of CO, and PM10 over the existing ambient air quality are found to be within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (Appendix 3) as well as IFC (World Bank EHS Guidelines). However predicted concentration of PM2.5, exceeding the GOI prescribed limit of 60 µg/m3 in the year 2047 with a macimum predicted concntration of 77 µg/m3.

3. Noise Levels

187. The ambient noise level along all the eleven selected subproject road sections is within standards. During the construction period, noise will be generated from the operation of heavy machinery, blasting works, the haulage of construction materials to the construction yard and the general activities at the yard itself. Concrete mixing and material movements will be the primary noise generating activities and will be uniformly distributed over the entire construction period. These construction activities are expected to produce noise levels in the range of 80-95 dB(A) at a distance of about 5 m from the source.

188. Construction noise is not normally regulated, though still may cause concern among local villagers. The range of typical noise levels in relation to distance from a construction site is shown in Table 38.

Table 37: Construction Noise / Distance Relationship Distance from construction site (m) Range of Typical Noise Level dB(A) 8 82 – 102 15 75 – 95 30 69 – 89 61 63 – 83 91 59 – 79 122 57 – 77 152 55 – 75 305 49 - 69 Source: Department of Transportation, State of Wisconsin (USA)

189. Piling, if necessary, will also cause vibration. Noise and vibration from this source will be unavoidable but the impact will only be temporary and affect people living or working near piling locations. In construction sites within 500 metres of a settlement, noisy operations should cease between 22:00 and 06:00 hrs. Regular maintenance of construction vehicles and machinery must also be undertaken to reduce noise. The impact and sources of noise and vibration are summarised in Table 39.

Table 38: Likely Impact on Noise Quality in the Vicinity of Project Area Impact Source Increased noise levels  Mobilisation of heavy construction machinery; causing discomfort to  Accelerations/ decelerations/ gear changes – though the local residents, workers extent of impact will depend on the level of congestion and and local fauna smoothness of the road surface;  Excavation work for foundations and grading;  Construction of structures and other facilities;  Crushing plants, asphalt production plants; and loading, transportation and unloading of construction materials.

190. Typical noise levels associated with various construction activities and equipments are presented in Table 40.

Table 39: Typical noise levels of principal construction equipments

(Noise Level in db (A) at 50 Feet) Clearing Structure Construction Bulldozer 80 Crane 75-77 Front end loader 72-84 Welding generator 71-82 Jack hammer 81-98 Concrete mixer 74-88 Crane with ball 75-87 Concrete pump 81-84 Concrete vibrator 76 Excavation and Earth Moving Air compressor 74-87 Bulldozer 80 Pneumatic tools 81-98 Backhoe 72-93 Bulldozer 80 Front end loader 72-84 Cement and dump trucks 83-94 89

Clearing Structure Construction Dump truck 83-94 Front end loader 72-84 Jack hammer 81-98 Dump truck 83-94 Scraper 80-93 Paver 86-88 Grading and Compaction Landscaping and clean-up Grader 80-93 Bulldozer 80 Roller 73-75 Backhoe 72-93 Truck 83-94 Paving Front and end loader 72-84 Paver 86-88 Dump truck 83-94 Truck 83-94 Paver 86-88 Tamper 74-77 Dump truck 83-94 Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, noise from Construction Equipment and Operations. Building Equipment and Home Appliance. NJID. 300.1.December 31, 1971

191. The noise levels indicated for various construction activities/equipment, while far exceeding permissible standards of CPCB and WB EHS for residential areas, it will occur only intermittently. Still, these extremely high sound levels present real risk to the health of workers onsite. Timely scheduling of construction activities, proper maintenance of construction machineries, use of personnel protective equipments etc. will minimize these impacts.

192. Residences, schools, temples, and other noise sensitive areas within 100 m the roadways will be affected temporarily during construction. The number of persons potentially affected and the duration of these effects cannot be estimated based on available information.

193. During construction, varying degree of noise impacts are likely to be felt by the communities of main settlements along the subproject roads. Although temporary in nature, the construction noise will affect the most communities living close to the construction zone.

194. Noise impacts are an unavoidable consequence of construction that should be mitigated by limiting the timing of construction to daylight hours (8am-5pm) in the vicinity of sensitive receptors. Further to minimize noise impacts near sensitive receptors (particularly schools), operation of excavator and other heavy machineries will be carried out mostly during off-hours (7 am to 9 am and 3.30 pm to 7 pm) and on holidays (Saturday and Sundays). Baseline noise will be established for all sensitive areas prior to construction and follow up noise monitoring will be carried out during the construction.

a. Noise Level Modeling and Predictions

195. Federal Highway Administration's Traffic Noise Model (FHWA TNM) helps for highway traffic noise prediction and analysis. TNM computes highway traffic noise at nearby receivers. As sources of noise, it includes noise emission levels for the following vehicle types:  Automobiles: all vehicles with two axles and four tires -- primarily designed to carry nine or fewer people (passenger cars, vans) or cargo (vans, light trucks) -- generally with gross vehicle weight less than 4,500 kg (9,900 lb);  Medium trucks: all cargo vehicles with two axles and six tires -- generally with gross vehicle weight between 4,500 kg (9,900 lb) and 12,000 kg (26,400 lb);  Heavy trucks: all cargo vehicles with three or more axles -- generally with gross vehicle weight more than 12,000 kg (26,400 lb);

 Buses: all vehicles designed to carry more than nine passengers; and  Motorcycles: all vehicles with two or three tires and an open-air driver / passenger compartment.

196. The procedure for prediction of noise levels involves the following steps:  Identification of various receivers  Determination of landuses and activities which may be affected by the noise generated  Assemble input parameters  Application of the model.

197. The description of the components to predict noise level are as follows: a. Receivers: TNM calculates the sound levels at the input receivers. In this study two type of receivers selected to assess the impacts of moving traffic on surrounding noise level. One, discrete receptor and second, grid receptor. b. Land uses: Land use along the road is obtained from the topographic drawings. This information provides the range of shielding and absorption factors to be applied at the various receivers. c. Input Parameters: Traffic volume for the projected period is obtained from the traffic projections. The total number of vehicles passing per hour by type - light, medium and heavy along with their average speed is used for predictions. d. Average Noise Level: All vehicles produce noise, which is taken as the base, and the cumulative noise at the receiver distance due to the whole traffic is estimated. The average noise level varies depending on the type of vehicle. e. Application of Model: Equivalent noise levels due to traffic at the receivers are estimated using Federal Highway Noise model. Equivalent Sound Level (TEQ, denoted by the symbol, LAeqT): Ten times the base-10 logarithm of the square of the ratio of time-average, mean-square, instantaneous A-weighted sound pressure, during a stated time interval, T (where T=t2-t1), and the reference mean-square sound pressure of 20 Pa, the threshold of human hearing, e.g., 1HEQ, denoted by the symbol, LAeq1H, represents the hourly equivalent sound level. LAeqT is related to LAE by the following equation :

LAeqT = LAE - 10*log10(t2-t1)

where LAE = Sound exposure level in dB

198. Sound Exposure Level (SEL, denoted by the symbol, LAE): Over a stated time interval, T (where T=t2-t1), ten times the base-10 logarithm of the ratio of a given time integral of squared instantaneous A-weighted sound pressure, and the product of the reference sound pressure of 20:Pa, the threshold of human hearing, and the reference duration of 1 sec. The time interval, T, must be long enough to include a majority of the sound source’s acoustic energy. As a minimum, this interval should encompass the 10 dB down points. Traffic data used in noise modelling are given below in table 40 and predicted noise levels are shown in table 41.

Table 40: Hourly traffic average traffic data at Dharna-Dharmkuwa Road Year 2 wheeler 3 wheeler 4 wheeler LCV HCV Buses 2016 1177 521 329 91 148 98 2020 1703 754 481 131 211 140 2025 2174 964 615 168 265 178 2030 2775 1231 783 214 338 227 2035 3543 1572 1000 273 429 289 2040 4521 2008 1277 349 548 369

Table 41: Predicted noise level along the selected road corridor Predicted LAeq in 1hr dB(A)

Distance from the edge of the road, m. Year 5 10 20 40 60 2016 42.20 37.89 35.56 33.42 31.23 2020 45.70 41.03 38.50 36.19 33.82 2025 51.60 46.33 43.48 40.86 38.19 2030 56.80 50.99 47.86 44.98 42.04 2035 62.50 56.11 52.66 49.49 46.26 2040 68.70 61.68 57.88 54.40 50.84

199. Observations: Noise levels (Leq) near the receivers are found to be within the desired levels for the respective categories. The maximum predicted value 42.2 dB(A) is recorded at the receiver located close to road corridor which is well within the permissible limit of 55 dB(A). The predicted levels show increase in noise levels for future years (beyond 2030) at all receivers considering increase in traffic volume.

200. Noise dispersion: A small road corridor has been selected to develop noise contour for base year as well as future years also. Due to model limitation, it is not possible to select the whole road corridor in the modelling domain. Therefore, spatial dispersion of noise have been show with a small stretch of road. Figure 18 to 24 shows noise level contour around a small road corridor for years 2016, 2020, 2025, 2030, 2035, 2040 and 2047, respectively. The selected road stretch is small part of Dharma-Karmkuwa road section. These predicted results are for peak traffic hours. During non-peak traffic hours, the noise level is very less compared to noise level for peak traffic hours.

Figure 15: Contour plot of noise level along the road corridor in year 2016

Figure 16: Contour plot of noise level along the road corridor in year 2020

Figure 17: Contour plot of noise level along the road corridor in year 2025

Figure 18: Contour plot of noise level along the road corridor in year 2030

Figure 19: Contour plot of noise level along the road corridor in year 2035

Figure 20: Contour plot of noise level along the road corridor in year 2040

Figure 21: Contour plot of noise level along the road corridor in year 2047

201. It can be seen from the Table 41 that noise levels (Leq) near the receivers are found to be within desired levels for the respective categories when compared with prescribed standards of CPCB (Government of India) as well as IFC (World Bank EHS Guidelines). The predicted levels show increase in noise levels for future years at all receivers considering increase in traffic volume. The current spot measurement level at few sensitive receptors shows much lower value compared to the traffic-based assessment indicating noise is being attenuated by various existing barriers like trees, buildings etc. Installations of physical noise barriers are proposed at sensitive locations close to the edge of the road i.e. Temples and Schools; to keep the projected noise levels at these locations within CPCB/WB EHS standards i.e. 55 dB(A).

202. The Noise barriers can be constructed from earth, concrete, masonry, wood, metal, and other materials. To effectively reduce sound transmission through the barrier, the material chosen must be rigid and sufficiently dense (at least 20 kilograms/square meter). All noise barrier material types are equally effective, acoustically, if they have this density. To effectively reduce the noise coming around its ends, a barrier should be at least eight times as long as the distance from the home or receiver to the barrier. A provision of five Noise barrier locations in each corridor is made which should be provided based on the willingness of the school/temple or religious structures authorities and technical feasibility. Conceptual drawing of the noise barried is provided in Figure 22 below. Environmental Specialist of supervision consultant will prepare site specific design of the noise barries and will provide it to the Contractor.

Figure 22: Conceptual Drawing of the Noise Barrier

203. Although the measures noise levels over the project duration is well within WB EHS standards; implementation of suitable mitigation measures will reduce the construction noise to acceptable limits. Mitigation measures should include:  Installations of noise barriers;  construction machinery should be located away from settlements;  careful planning of machinery operation and the scheduling of such operations;  controlled blasting should only be carried out with prior approval from the Engineer in charge;  contractors should be required to fit noise shields on construction machinery and to provide earplugs to the operators of heavy machines; and  only controlled blasting should be conducted.

204. Trees will be planted along the roads to act as natural barrier to noise. Further, physical noise barriers have been provided in the subproject design at sensitive locations. These physical noise barriers can be constructed from earth, concrete, masonry, wood, metal, and other materials. To effectively reduce sound transmission through the barrier, the material chosen must be rigid and sufficiently dense (at least 20 kilograms/square meter). To effectively reduce the noise coming around its ends, a barrier should be at least eight times as long as the distance from the home or receiver to the barrier. 95

h. Topography and Appearance

205. Construction activities of the project road will bring permanent changes in the local-level topography and appearance of the project sites. There will be loss in aesthetic beauty of the project areas mainly due to the earthwork. Table 43 elaborates potential effects on the topography and appearance and appropriate mitigation measures.

Table 42: Potential Effects on Topography by the Proposed Road Sections Upgrading SI. Construction Potential effect on Mitigation No. activity topography and appearance 1. Clearing of Scarring of landscape from Cut material should be used to vegetation for cutting and potential widen the road or disposed off widening of the erosion(short term and long at proper disposal sites. road term) may be caused. Cut slopes should be re- There may be minor vegetated immediately after permanent changes in the widening activities. landscape. 2. Stone quarrying Scarring of landscape and Stone quarrying should only potential landslides (rock be undertaken in legally slides/falls). There may be approved areas. Controlled permanent changes in the and environmental friendly landscape. quarrying should be carried out to minimise landslides and erosion. 3. Earthwork from Scarring of landscape due Borrow areas should be in borrow areas to unearthing activities. legally approved locations. As Minor but permanent soon as construction activities changes in landscape. are complete, they should be re-vegetated and brought back as far as possible to their previous appearance. 4 Waste disposal Disposal of cut soils and Cut off material should be debris at improper locations used to widen the road or which will make the area disposed of at proper disposal look untidy and sites. unattractive. 5 Establishment of Disposal of waste and litter Provision and allocation of labour camps at improper locations and proper waste disposal bins deforestation for fire-wood and sites are required. A will make the area look dirty supply of cooking gas should and unattractive. be provided by the contractor to eliminate the use of fire wood.

3. Ecological Resources

a. Wildlife

206. The proposed road alignment is not located inside or within a 10 kilometer distance from a legally protected or key biodiversity area which was identified as the corridor of impact.

207. The impacts of road building to wildlife includes direct and indirect mortality; destroying, degrading, and fragmenting habitat; serves as barriers to movement; and spurs domino effect brought by a change in land-use. Small animals that often disperse, large animals like ungulates and carnivores are at risk to road kills during project operation. Since improvement will be carried out on existing roads wildlife habitat fragmentation is not expected. However construction work in forest areas may cause temporary disruption of wildlife movements in the project areas.

208. To avoid impacts to wildlife the following measures will be implemented:  Bridge design including approaches will take into account wildlife movements along riparian corridors,  Where smaller animals are known to disperse, road design will consider the construction of faunal culvert or pipe crossing  Where endangered and critically endangered bird species are known take territories along the road, strict noise control will be implemented particularly during construction period to avoid disturbance  Information and cautionary roadside signages will be installed to warn drivers of impending sensitive areas.

b. Vegetation

209. Part of the subproject roads (three roads in Singrauli district) passes though the forest area. The density of vegetation in forest is 0.4 to 0.5. Removal of the existing vegetative cover and the uprooting of 3378 trees is an unfortunate activity, which will reduce the ecological balance in the areas. This will also enhance soil erosion. Scrub forests and vegetation will also be removed for improvement of subproject road sections. The loss of vegetative cover will mostly be permanent and only some might be revived through mitigation efforts. Another impact from road construction activities and deriving from the quarrying, preparation and transfer of stone chips and other earthwork; is the accumulation of dust on the surrounding vegetation. This leads to deterioration of the vegetative health, which in turn will affect the ecology as well as the aesthetic beauty of the area. Induced impacts may result from the following:  increased forest harvesting for fire-wood, construction timber, forage, medicinal plants and other products;  increased earth and rock extraction;  construction crew demands for wood as a fuel and for building materials;  construction crew demands for food and recreational hunting and fishing;

210. To minimise negative impacts on the vegetative cover the contract documents should specify that:  all wood building material for workers’ housing should be brought from outside the project area;  workers should be supplied with non-wood fuels such as kerosene or liquefied petroleum gas for the duration of the contract;  all contract equipment and plants should be cleaned to the satisfaction of the project engineer in charge prior to their relocation to project sites;  during site clearance, care should be taken to ensure that the minimum area of vegetation area is affected; and 97

 water sprinkling of trucks used as construction vehicles should be properly and regularly undertaken, so that dust deposition problem on vegetation are minimised.

4. Human Use Values

211. Field reconnaissance surveys of the subproject roads were conducted to assess the environmental and social conditions. It was noted that since the proposed improvements will be carried out within available road width, relocation of structures will not be required. The widening options have been devised to avoid impacts of structures.

212. At certain locations on the roads, particularly at bridge /culvert sites, traffic will be temporarily diverted from the existing carriageway while construction is in progress and temporary traffic diversions will be managed within the ROW. In other instances, traffic may have to be diverted across adjacent private land, in which case compensation will be paid for any loss of crops or the replacement of damaged structures. In other situations, most frequently not at bridge sites, for example when bitumen surfacing is in progress, it may be required to close the road temporarily. In these circumstances, adequate radio and press releases should be made beforehand and a date/time given for the re-opening.

213. Most construction will be undertaken during the dry season when few crops are planted. Losses should be minimised during construction.

5. Sensitive Location Such as School, College and Hospital along the Project Road

214. The sensitive location such as school, college and hospital along subproject road within 100 meter from the edge of the existing road has been identified as given Table 26.

215. These sensitive structures are kept unaffected by the proposed improvement proposals. Short term impacts during the construction stage are expected. Measures such as timely scheduling of construction activities in these areas, provision of sign boards, appropriate noise barriers such as planting trees and / or raised boundary walls are adopted to minimize impacts.

6. Health, Safety and Hygiene for Construction Workers

216. Construction of the subproject road sections will result in the generation of waste. In isolated places, the amount of waste generated may be greater than normal because of substandard subsoil materials, which will need to the replaced.

217. The Contractor will be required to control the construction sites, keep it clean and provide facilities such as dust bins and collectors for the temporary storage of all waste. This waste should be adequately stored to avoid pollution of water supplies and water sources and to avoid dust formation. The Contractor will be responsible for the safe removal and/or storage of all waste in order to prevent environmental pollution of any type that may be harmful to people or animals.

218. All necessary safeguards should be taken to ensure the safety, welfare and good health of all persons entitled to be on the sites and to ensure that works are carried out in a safe and efficient manner. All personnel working at vulnerable site locations will wear safety helmets and strong footwear. It should be ensured that all workmen and staff employed on site use proper

safety equipment – for example, eye protectors, ear plugs, safety helmets, the designated safety equipment when working over water - and that proper rescue equipment is available. Fire extinguishers and first-aid equipment will be kept at all sites.

219. The construction camps are anticipated to house up to 200 people for about two years. With this concentration of people, the potential for the transmission of diseases and illnesses will increase. The main health and safety risks during construction will arise from:

 inadequate sanitation facilities in worker camps;  introduction of sexually transmitted, and other diseases, by immigrant workers; and  outbreaks of malaria, typhoid, cholera etc. amongst the labour force.

220. The following actions will be undertaken at construction camps and stipulated in construction contracts:  submit and obtain approval for a health and safety plan prior to the commencement of work;  provision of adequate health care facilities; and  workers will be required to undergo pre-employment medical screening and treatment (if required) and periodic health checks thereafter.

221. The subprojects will support a public health education programme for workers and villagers covering road safety, malaria, hygiene, and sexually transmitted diseases. The district health departments will also be invited to participate in monitoring and educating communities and workers affected by the project.

7. Nuisance to Nearby Properties

222. Nuisance to nearby properties is likely to result from:  noise and vibration from mechanical devices and construction plant;  dust during quarrying, construction and the trafficking of new surfaces prior to sealing;  gaseous emissions from heavy equipment; and  fumes from asphalt boiling sites.

223. Much of the subproject road sections are existing roads in plain terrains and presently air/dust pollution is not a major issue. Nonetheless, there will be regular watering of the road surfaces or the application of emulsion coats near villages, where dust is a nuisance. Noise generating equipment such as power generators and concrete mixers will be kept away from populated/commercial areas. Provisions will be incorporated into the contractor’s contract to require the use of dust suppression measures.

8. Interference with Utilities and Traffic

224. On the subproject roads, utilities interfere with the ROW at few locations that will have to be shifted / removed prior to construction. This should not be a major problem.

225. Traffic may experience minor delays when diverted around active construction areas, but will be more severely hampered at the locations where temporary road closures are 99

necessary. Such hazard points will have proper signs indicating the nature of the problem envisaged.

226. Contractor will ensure that information on the timing of construction works and notifications of road closure (if any) is provided via the local media (radio, TV, newspaper etc.) or through the local community heads.

9. Community Impacts

227. Construction camps may put stress on local resources and the infrastructure in nearby communities resulting to people raising grievances. This sometimes leads to aggression between residents and migrant workers. To prevent such problems, the contractor should provide the construction camps with facilities such as health care clinics, places of worship, and occasional entertainment. The use of local labourers during the construction will be promoted to minimise these problems.

10. Quality of Life

228. The impact of the improvements of subproject roads on the socio-economic environment will be significantly beneficial. Improved access and reduced travel time and cost will be major stimuli to economic growth, particularly in rural areas. Better access of agricultural goods to market will be important and a major contributor to poverty reduction.

229. Increased labour mobility will occur. This has both positive and negative impacts. Increased access is a two-way phenomenon, and the corollary to increased access to the project areas is increased access for the residents of these areas to more urban life-styles. Out- migration may result. There is also the likelihood of the relocation of homes and businesses to new road-side locations.

230. During construction, benefits to local people can be maximised if the contractor recruits construction workers locally regardless of gender. Where possible, he/she should also not discriminate in the employment of women.

11. Construction Materials

231. Adequate earth material is available from barren land in the vicinity. Estimated quantity for each road section is about 1,45,500 cum Aggregates (320000 MT) will be mostly sourced from licensed quarries available locally. Sand 80,000 cum will be taken from river beds after prior permission from competent authority.

232. Construction water requirement (avg. 300KLD and peak 400 KLD for each road sections) will be met through local rivers and other local streams. Domestic water requirement (50 KLD) for workers will also be met mainly through local streams. If needed, groundwater may also be abstracted.

233. Road maintenance, repair and new construction will continue to cause large demands for construction materials. There is a clear need for a better materials supply policy in each district to minimise environmental impacts of small-scale, poorly managed operations and improve the quality and reliability of supply. In some districts, it may be appropriate to develop centralised quarries, if an operator can be attracted. In any case, pre-designation of sources

100

would give contractors a level playing field for bidding and minimise incentives for environmentally damaging cost cutting.

234. The engineering team as part of material survey has identified and recommended sources of the construction materials. Details are these sources are provided in Main Volume 1 (Material survey chapter) of Detailed Project Report. As a prior requirement of subproject, every new quarry and borrow area should also be subjected to a site specific environmental investigation work according to an approved plan; and should be left in a safe condition or restored to a productive land use. Subject to these conditions, obtaining construction materials for subprojects will not cause unacceptable impacts.

235. Quarry and borrow pits may be filled with rejected construction waste and afterwards should be given a vegetative cover. If this is not possible, then the excavated slopes will be filled in such a way that they resemble an original ground surface.

236. Mitigation for Quarries  aggregates will be first sourced from licensed quarry sites (which are in operation) that comply with environmental and other applicable regulations;  occupational safety procedures/practices for the work force will be adhered to in all quarries;  quarry and crushing units will be provided with adequate dust suppression measures; and  regular monitoring of the quarries by concerned authorities to ensure compliance with environmental management and monitoring measures.

237. Mitigation of Borrow Areas  prior approval will be obtained from concerned authorities and all local environmental regulations be complied with;  within all identified borrow areas, the actual extent of area to be excavated will be demarcated with signs and access to the operational area controlled;  borrow pit plant and machinery will conform to CPCB and World Bank EHS noise emission regulations;  protective gear will be provided to the workforce exposed to noise levels beyond threshold limits and there should be proper rotation of such personnel; and  all operation areas will be water sprinkled to control dust levels to national ambient air quality standards.

238. The subprojects will require large amounts of bitumen or bitumen emulsion usually stored in drums. These empty bitumen drums are generally recycled as steel sheeting, or used in road construction as parapets or for river bank stabilisation. When supplied and used in this manner, bitumen is not regarded as a significant environmental hazard.

239. The subprojects will require the import, transport and use of fuel and oils. Minor diesel spills are common in region, especially around fuel stations. To mitigate these impacts following measures will be applied.  Secondary containment around fuel tanks and at fuelling stations will be built;  Oil and fuel spills, and other runoff from contaminated areas will be controlled; and  Equipment and fuel depots will be placed in safe zones away from drinking water sources and along river banks. 101

240. The subprojects provides an opportunity to assist the PIU and contractors in improving fuel handling practices so as to minimise future fuel spillage.

F. Environmental Impacts - Operation Phase

1. Noise Vibration, Air Pollution, Runoff, Spoils of Hazardous Materials

241. The current low traffic flows along the subproject roads is expected to increase because of improved economic activities associated with better access. The larger numbers of vehicles will be an additional source of noise and gaseous emissions.

242. An incremental increase of about 3 to 5 dB(A) noise level is expected due to increased traffic over the designed life of the project i.e. 20 years. Most of these increase in noise level will be attenuated by natural means i.e. distance form source, obstacles from nearby and surrounding building and structures, difference in levels of vehicle and receptor as well as installation of recommended mitigation measures such as installation of noise barriers at sensitive location, planning of trees etc.

243. Repairs to culverts and new drainage work will eliminate/reduce the soil erosion problems presently caused by poor cross drainage. Also, the situation will remain good because theseroads pass through area that are largely vegetated and plants have the capacity to absorb gaseous as well as noise pollutants. Bioengineering techniques (such as turging of slopes through rough grassing, tree plantation along the slopes etc.) may also help to absorb pollution.

244. Since the subproject roads are mostly passing through plain terrain and works will not include blasting of rocks (which is mainly requires in hilly terrains), therefore possibilities of Acid Rock Drainage (ARD) are very remote. ARD causes mainly due to leaching of sulphur containing materials from rocks that become exposed to atmospheric oxygen by blasting work.

2. Land Use and Settlements

245. The likely impacts on land use and settlement patterns are limited. Improved access will lead to increased migration, but this will occur gradually and over a prolonged period. There will be time for new residential areas to be established. There will be a need to control ribbon development.

3. Social Impacts

246. Specific benefits to local people will include:  easier communication;  easier access to markets (both internally and regionally) with savings in travel times and costs;  enhanced market efficiency through better distribution and accelerated deliveries etc.;  improved access to health, education and other social services;  employment generation;  improved technical skills; and  enhanced economic activity.

247. Likely adverse social impacts will include:

102

 increased chances of exposure to communicable diseases, particularly during construction;  influxes of new settlers leading to increased pressure on natural resources causing hardship to local communities relying on local/forest resources; and  rural-to-urban migration causing labour shortages in the depleted rural areas and other negative impacts in the urban areas.

G. Cumulative and Induced Environmental Impacts

248. According to the ADB Environment Safeguards Sourcebook 8 Cumulative Impacts is described as: “The combination of multiple impacts from existing projects, the proposed subprojects, and anticipated future projects that may result in significant adverse and/or beneficial impacts that cannot be expected in the case of a stand-alone project.” The sourcebook also describes Induced Impacts as: “Adverse and/or beneficial impacts on areas and communities from unintended but predictable developments caused by a project, which may occur at later or at a different location.

249. Economic activities supporting transport like fuel stations, automotive repair shops, lodging, and restaurants are expected to increase with increase of traffic and induce development in the project areas. The improved roads will provide better connectivity and result in (i) Reduction in travel time (ii) better mode and frequency of transport (iii) access to quality health care facilities, educational and other infrastructural facilities (iv) enhanced tourism activities in the areas, districts and state which in many terms will boost the local economy (v) better investment climate for industries creating more employment opportunities to local people.

250. In terms of environment safeguard issues the improved road surface is expected to result in less dust and noise due to traffic plying on the damaged roads. However, the increased traffic due to the improved road will generate more air pollution due to vehicle exhaust and noise. The smoother road conditions will also result in increase of traffic speeds, hence creating more risks for accidents amongst traffic users as well as the local communities in the subproject areas of four districts in Madhya Pradesh.

251. For addressing the impacts of air pollution and noise, regular maintenance of the road surface, maintenance and monitoring of newly planted trees and installation of noise barriers where necessary have been included in the EMP for implementation during operation stage. For addressing safety related impacts, regular maintenance of the road furniture include safety related furniture, enforcing rules against encroachment of structures and sensitive structures (schools, temples etc.) inside the ROW and implementation of the emergency response system has been included in the EMP for implementation during operation stage,

252. Information on future development projects along the project roads was not available. Hence, it is difficult to assess cumulative impacts from other projects which may get implemented in the project areas.Hoowever road upgrade projects usually do not have any cumulative environmental impacts except for wildlife habitat fragmentation, which is not the case here with eleven selected subprojects under MPMDR-2 project, since the road upgrade will be completed within the existing right of way.

8Environment Safeguards, A Good Practice Sourcebook, Draft Working Document, December 2012 103

H. Potential Environmental Enhancement/ Protection Measures

253. Appendix 9 to Appendix 12 of this IEE Report presents good environmental management practices and guide documents in the following aspects of road construction: 1. Tree Plantation and Management – Appendix 9 2. Borrow Area Management – Appendix 10 3. Emergency Management System – Appendix 11 4. Debris Disposal Management – Appendix 12

104

VI. CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS AND RISKS

254. The Transport Emissions Evaluation Model for Projects (TEEMP)9 developed by Clean 10 Air Asia was utilized to assess the CO2 gross emissions with and without the project improvements. The main improvement from the project that was considered for the model are better surface roughness with initially 2m/km which may deteoriate over a period but not less than 3.5 m/km and widening of roads from single lane (3.5m) to intermediate lane (5.5). These were translated into impacts on traffic speed and hence fuel consumption. The model also allows for the inclusion of impacts related to traffic congestion with and without project through provisions for inserting data on the traffic numbers, lane width, number of lanes and volume/capacity saturation limit.

255. Information that was fed into the model for projecting the CO2 emissions were: (i) The project will rehabilitate and widen approximately 362.20 km of the major district roads in the State of Madhya Pradesh, which will have different sections having road length from 20 km to 60 km. (ii) The road configuration will change from single lane to intermediate lane with carriageway width of 5.5 m except Bhatura-Bhadpur Road in which 2-lane C/W has been proposed. (iii) Existing road roughness is mostly 6.0 m/km and will be improved to 2.0 m/km, which may further reach upto 3.5 m/km during 7 years of road operations and hence will be resurfaced after every 7 years. (iv) Construction will take place over a period of 24 months in 2017-19 and road operations will begin in the end 2019. (v) The design life of the road is 20 years. (vi) Other improvements include the repair or reconstruction of damagedculverts, introduction of lined longitudinal and cross drains for the road andremoval of irregularities on the existing vertical profile and road safetyappurtenances.

256. Traffic forecasts were taken from the detailed project reports prepared for these nine road sections. Maximum PCU for 1.0 lanes and 1.5 lanes were considered as 7,000 and 12,000 respectively in consistent to IRC guidelines. The volume/capacity saturation limit was taken at 2.0 for optimum travel speed and fuel consumption. Emission factors were mostly taken from the CBCP/MOEF (2007) Draft Report on Emission Factor Development for Indian Vehicles, the Automotive Research Association of India, and C. Reynolds et.al (2011) Climate and Health Relevant Emissions from in-Use Indian for three-wheelers rickshaw as shown in Table 44.

Table 43:CO2 Emission Factors Vehicle Type Gasoline Diesel 2-Wheel 2.28 kg/l 3-Wheel 2.63 kg/l Cars/ Jeeps 2.59 kg/l 2.68 kg/l LCV 3.21 kg/l Bus 3.61 kg/l HCV 3.50 kg/l

9 TEEMP is an excel-based, free-of-charge spreadsheet models to evaluate emissions impacts of transport projects. 10A network of 250 organizations in 31 countries established by the Asian Development Bank, World Bank, and USAID to promote better air quality and livable cities by translating knowledge to policies and actions that reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from transport, energy and other sectors. 105

257. It was assumed that the 2-wheelers and 3-wheelers have average trip distance of 1/4th of the total road length in each section, whereas all other vehicles do use the entire length as average trip distance. Furthermore, 2-wheelers and 3-wheelers constitute 100% and 90%, respectively of the total local traffic.

258. It has also been assumed that over the time, the fleet composition will change and the assumptions taken for the same are shown in Table 45.

Table 44:Emission Standards of Fleet (%) Vehicle Type Current Scenario Year 2037 Pre-Euro Euro I Euro II Euro III Euro I Euro II Euro III 2-Wheel 50% 50% 30% 70% - 3-Wheel 80% 20% 40% 60% Cars/ Jeeps 40% 40% 20% 40% 60% LCV/Bus/HCV 70% 20% 10% 10% 40% 50%

259. Emissions from road construction were estimated by using the emission factor for rural roads, by using ‘Impact of Sri Lankan Rural Roads on Greenhouse Gas Emissions & Mitigation and Climate Change – A Case Study 2 (http://www.rshanthini.com/tmp/CP551SD/RuralRoadandGHG.pdf) which is equivalent to 11,000 kg CO2/km of road construction.’

260. Estimated carbon emissions. The proposed road upgrading resulting to surface roughness and road capacity improvements have implications in CO2 emissions. Improved roughness results to higher speed and lesser emissions while increase road users increases emissions. These factors are further affected by traffic congestion once the volume/capacity saturation limit.

261. CO2 emissions will also result from the processing and manufacturing of raw materials needed to upgrade the project road and in the case of project, to upgrade and strengthen the road length of approximately 362.20 km, total CO2 emissions will be of the order of 49223.55 tons as shown in Table 46.

Table 45: Estimated Total CO2 Emissions during Road Construction Emission CO2 Length Name of Road Factor (ton Emission (Km) CO2/Km) (tons) Kharamseda Kirhai Ramgarh Road 34.35 3764.76 Jharkua Raigaon Karsara Road 23.95 2624.92 Bhatura Bhadpur Barrakhurd Road 20.05 2197.48 Parsona Mada Road 24.39 2673.144 Ramgarh Mada Road 19.87 2177.752 Harphari Khaira Misirgawan via Shivpurva Road 25.99 2848.504 Chitrangi-Garhwa Road 22.67 109.6 12012.16 Anuppur Jaitpur Road 36.66 4017.936 Gohparu Rasmohni Budhar (via Bathiya) Road 39.94 4376.876 Pasgarhi Devri Janakpur Road 23.49 2573.956 Jhurai – Sarai Road 31.44 3445.824 Sohagpur – Manpur Road 59.40 6510.24 TOTAL 362.20 49223.55

106

262. The design life of roads is 20 years. Total CO2 emission at business-as-usual scenario was estimated at 26401.92 tons/year and without-and with-induced traffic are 27269.76 tons/year and 37922.25 tons/year, respectively. These values are below the 100,000 tons per year threshold set in the ADB SPS 2009. Therefore it is not necessary to implement options to reduce or offset C02 emissions under the project.

263. The project's section-wise C02 emission intensity indicators are provided in Table 46 whereas combines C02 emission intensity indicators are presented in Table 47.

Table 46: Project CO2 Emissions Intensity Indicators CO2 Road Details Business-As- Project (without Project (with Usual Induced Traffic) Induced Traffic) tons/km 310.65 281.51 418.14 tons/year 1,309.05 1,186.24 1,761.99 Kharamseda Kirhai tons/km/year 17.26 15.64 23.23 Ramgarh g/p km 62.75 56.87 223.67 g/t km 109.44 99.18 390.09 tons/km 516.92 472.12 701.12 tons/year 1,743.17 1,592.08 2,364.35 Jharkua Raigaon tons/km/year 28.72 26.23 38.95 Karsara Road g/p km 69.67 63.63 249 g/t km 98.15 89.64 350.78 tons/km 2,344.03 1,790.08 2,599.20 tons/year 8,653.59 6,608.67 9,790.00 Bhatura Bhadpur tons/km/year 129.28 98.39 146.23 Barrakhurd Road g/p km 61.7 45.31 169.65 g/t km 165.47 125.71 455.21 tons/km 1,024.21 923.27 1,364.25 tons/year 34.65 3,123.74 4,615.72 Parsona Mada Road tons/km/year 56.9 51.29 75.79 g/p km 74.25 66.93 261.12 g/t km 75.3 67.87 264.81 tons/km 314.08 286.68 425.64 tons/year 1,031.22 941.28 1,397.51 Ramgarh Mada Road tons/km/year 17.45 15.93 23.65 g/p km 103.35 94.33 369.08 g/t km 59.52 54.33 212.54 tons/km 196.71 171.04 254.02 Harphari Khaira tons/year 693.94 603.38 896.13 Misirgawan via tons/km/year 10.93 9.5 14.11 Shivpurva Road g/p km 97.71 84.96 334.21 g/t km 102.65 89.25 351.08 tons/km 9315.54 8476.48 11369.95 Chitrangi-Garhwa tons/year 26401.92 27269.76 37922.25 Road tons/km/year 530.02 493.24 643.99 107

CO2 Road Details Business-As- Project (without Project (with Usual Induced Traffic) Induced Traffic) g/p km 913 875.51 3030.46 g/t km 1150.02 1083.3 3891.39 tons/km 1,870.88 1,403.45 2,215.71 tons/year 6,402.75 5,256.73 7,730.69 Anuppur Jaitpur Road tons/km/year 105.38 85.53 120.98 g/p km 56.6 44.53 173.5 g/t km 154.35 122.9 466.61 tons/km 445.29 407.29 606.00 Gohparu Rasmohni tons/year 1,409.21 1,296.20 1,924.53 Budhar (via Bathiya) tons/km/year 23.63 23.68 32.72 Road g/pkm 67.48 62.23 227.12 g/tkm 121.06 111.59 412.99 tons/km 198.69 170.04 154.02 tons/year 593.94 599.38 796.13 Pasgarhi Devri tons/km/year 11.93 8.5 15.12 Janakpur Road g/pkm 96.71 85.96 329.21 g/tkm 106.65 88.25 250.08 tons/km 462.63 426.04 405.65 tons/year 1,847.95 1,689.83 1,620.34 Jhurai – Sarai Road tons/km/year 25.7 23.5 22.54 g/pkm 69.73 63.76 241.19 g/tkm 94.74 86.64 327.72 tons/km 1,951.66 1,973.92 1,972.18 tons/year 3,731.68 3,768.85 4,128.73 Sohagpur – Manpur tons/km/year 120.63 125.55 116.56 Road g/pkm 125.01 122.04 118.5 g/tkm 58.19 58.69 58.4

264. Overall Project's C02 emission intensity indicators are provided below in Table 48.

Table 47: Project C02 Emissions Intensity indicators CO2 Particular Business-As- Project (without Induced Project (with Induced Usual Traffic) Traffic) tons/km 9315.54 8476.48 11369.95 tons/year 26401.92 27269.76 37922.25 tons/km/year 530.02 493.24 643.99 g/pkm 913 875.51 3030.46 g/tkm 1150.02 1083.3 3891.39

265. The above tables clearly indicate that the Business As Usual scenario will have higher CO2 emissions due to the higher roughness and lowercapacity. However, the with project scenarios will be significantly lower CO2 emissions due to the improvement in road roughness as well as capacity enhancement. The Business As Usual scenario indicates that without

108

increase in traffic and with changes in fleet composition at the later stages of the project, there will be some reduction from the current levels. Furthermore, with project scenarios (with induced traffic), there will be increase in the CO2 emission levels over the time due to the increase in the traffic volume, however, the emissions will be controlled by maintaining the road roughness below 2.0 m/km during the entire project life as well as enhanced capacity of the road (from 1.0 lanes to 1.5 lanes). This will result in annual CO2 emissions of the entire road below threshold limit of 100,000 tons/year.

1. Climate Risks and Adaptation Needs

266. Sector specific climate risks screening has been done for overall transport sector of Madhya Pradesh to analyse impact on road components due to likely change in climatic variables, mainly temperature and precipitation. Projections have been made for 2080s (Reference: The MP SAPCC draft report provides climate projections for 2030s (2021-2050) and 2080s (2071-2098) that have been derived from PRECIS (Providing Regional Climate for Impact Studies), which is a desktop version of the HadRM3 model with a grid resolution of 0.44° x 0.44°. PRECIS simulation dataset was provided by the Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune.). Given the projected variations of temperature11 and precipitation12 the project roads were screened for different types of climate risks and impact on road components. Increased temperature and precipitation will have following impacts:

267. High Precipitation Impacting Roads/ Bridge/ Embankment: Heavy rains can cause disruption of the road networks, decreased accessibility, erosion of roads and embankments, surface water drainage problems, slope failures, landslides, among others. Increased river flow resulting from precipitation and storminess may result in damages to bridges, pavements, and other road structures. Bridge / culvert capacities are reduced or exceeded, causing upstream flooding to occur.

268. High Temperature Impacting Road Stability: Extreme heat, combined with traffic loading, speed and density can soften asphalt roads, leading to increased wear and tear. It is likely that there would be concerns regarding pavement integrity such as softening, traffic- related rutting, embrittlement, migration of liquid asphalt. Additionally, thermal expansion in bridge expansion joints and paved surfaces may be experienced.

269. Climate risk maps referred from different sources13 were superimposed on sub-project’s road alignment maps. Low to high risks identified for the project roads were earthquake, Drought, fire, cyclone and flooding. This was further corroborated by consultations at various levels to find out information on history of flooding, forest fire, cyclone and any other climatic risk in the project area.

270. Earthquake: All the subprojects are in earthquake zone II which is least to moderate risk zone. Applicable seismic standards stipulated in the clause under IRC: 6-2014 codes have

11The average surface daily maximum temperatures, in the period 2030s is projected to rise by 1.8-2.0oC throughout Madhya Pradesh and the daily minimum temperature is projected to rise between 2.0oC to 2.4oC during the same period; the eastern half of the state experiencing more warming than the western half. By 2080s, the maximum temperature is projected to rise between 3.4oC to 4.4oC with northern region experiencing warmer temperatures 12Increase in precipitation by 1.25 times (by 2050) the current observed rainfall in most parts of Madhya Pradesh; No change in Morena, Shivpuri, Gwalior and Bhind; Increase in precipitation in eastern parts of Hoshangabad, northern part of Betul, north eastern parts of Betul and Southern part of Sehore. 13 Earthquake Hazard Map of India, BMTPC: Vulnerability Atlas – 2nd Edition; http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/faq-10-1.html. . 109

been adopted in designing the structures to sustain the magnitude of earthquake corresponding to Seismic zone II.

271. Forest Fire: As per disaster management plan of Madhya Pradesh none of the project district is prone to forest fire risk presently. However rising temperatures and reduced top soil moisture due to increased evapotranspiration, the forest fire risk will escalate in the future.

272. Drought: All the project districts of the state are affected by drought. Soil moisture loss through evapotranspiration is projected to increase as a result of projected increase in annual mean temperature (3.40 Celsius by 2080s). Increased drought frequency may lead to increased susceptibility to consolidation of the substructure with (unequal) settlement, more generation of smog, and unavailability of water for compaction work.

273. Flood: The study area being predominantly plain to rolling does not have flood problem. However, flash floods occurred in some districts including some parts of project districts. However, entire asian monsoon region is likely to witness more extreme rainfall events in future due to global warming impact. All structure have been designed for 50 yr return period with anticipated risk of rarer flood generally of next higher frequency i.e. 100 yr return period flood on the designed structures.

274. Key engineering measures taken to address flood risks in the design are: i) increase in embankment height, ii) construction of new side and lead away drains, iii) construction of new culverts and widening of existing ones and iv) improvement and new construction of minor and major bridges. As shown in Table , costs for taking these measures add up to a total of Rs. 97.69 crores. This is approximately 14% of the total civil works costs for the eleven selected subproject roads. It must be pointed out that these measures would have been considered anyway in the conventional design as the issue of flooding is a threat to the sustainability of the road. However, these measures also contribute to adaptation of the roads for future increases in precipitation. This risk screening and risk identification exercise has helped to ensure that all roads with climate risks have adequate risk mitigation or adaptation measures. The detailed list of roads with climate risks, specific engineering measures taken and the costs of those measures are provided in Table 49. Provisions have also been made in the bidding documents for the contractor to prepare contract package specific EMP’s based on the final detailed design to address a range of issues including climate related risks and vulnerabilities and accordingly incorporate required costs in the BOQ. Detailed assessment of the climate change risk carried out for transport sector in Madhya Pradesh State is provided in Appendix 14.

110

Table 48: Details of Climate Adaptation Measures with Cost Implications

Kharamseda Bhatura Mada- Chitrangi- Pasghari Jharkua- Parsona- Harphari- Anuppur Goparu Jhurai-Sarai Sohagpur Roads / Details Ramgarh Bhadnpur Ramgarh Garhwa Janakpur Total Raigaon Road Mada Road Khaira Road Jaitpur Road Rasmoni Road Road Manpur Road Road Road Road Road Road A. Cross-drainage structures A.1 Culvert Nos. 166 49 50 52 69 64 52 57 58 48 105 770 Culvert Length Existing 199.2 58.8 166 56 82.8 734 181.1 224.15 121 57.6 285 2165.65 (m) Proposed 0 0 2.4 1.2 0 18 1.2 0 0 0 22.8

A.2 Bridge Nos. 11 2 2 4 5 6 9 7 4 6 10 66 Bridge Length Existing 188.8 33.0 105.9 72.7 566.5 351.9 347.85 379 156.5 385 2587.15 (m) Proposed 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 Cost Implication (Rs. Cr) 13.43 5.05 10.6 3.39 5.34 5.05 17.7 8.6 3.9 4.98 6.6 84.64

B. Embankment Raising No. of reaches ______0 Length raised (m) ______0 Cost Implication (Rs. Cr) 0.28 0.06 0.25 0.26 0.45 0.39 0.45 0.82 0.64 0.56 1.06 5.22

C. Roadside drains Lined Built-up (m) 8184 6028 1161 3464 1200 2974 1612 3506 4500 _ 4106 36735 Lined Open (m) ______0 Unlined Open (m) 59498 41620 38402 44878 38004 48628 70434 75026 42228 62368 114460 635546 Cost Implication (Rs. Cr) 1.08 0.77 0.77 0.83 0.44 0.57 0.61 0.32 1.05 0.39 1.0 7.83

Total Cost (Cr.) 14.79 5.88 11.62 4.48 6.23 6.01 18.76 9.74 5.59 5.93 8.7 Total Cost (Cr.) 97.69

111

VII. CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE

275. In accordance with ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) 2009 meaningful consultations were held early and throughout the subproject development stages to allow the incorporation of relevant views of the stakeholders in the final project design, mitigation measures, implementation issues, and enhance the distribution of benefits. All the five principles of information dissemination, information solicitation, integration, co-ordination, and engagement into dialogue were incorporated in the consultation process. The analysis of environmental impacts likely from the subprojects was strengthened and modified based on opinions of all those consulted, especially in the micro level by setting up dialogues with the village people from whom information on site facts and prevailing conditions were collected. The requirement of public consultation during the implementation of the subproject have been proposed as part of the mitigation plan.

A. Objectives of the Consultations

276. Stakeholder’s consultations were held with intent to understand their concerns, apprehensions, overall opinion and solicit recommendations to improve subproject design and implementation. Informal meetings, interviews were organized covering the entire subprojects design stage. Consultations provide affected people a platform to ensure incorporation of their concerns in the decision making process and foster co-operation among officers of MPRDC, the community and the stakeholders to achieve a cordial working relationship for smooth implementation of the subprojects. It inculcates the sense of belongingness in the public about the subprojects.

277. The discussions were designed to receive maximum inputs from the participants regarding their acceptability and environmental concerns arising out of the subprojects. They were given the brief outline of the subprojects to which their opinions was required particularly in identifying and mitigating any potential adverse impact.

B. Methodology for Consultations

278. Consultation with the stakeholders, beneficiaries, and community leaders were carried out using standard structured questionnaires as well as unstructured questionnaires. Questionnaire survey/ discussions were designed to obtain background information and details of general environmental issues that concern people in the project areas. In addition, environmental issues were discussed with relevant organizations, government officials, beneficiaries, community leaders and experts. Besides, personal discussions with officials, on site discussion with affected stakeholders, and reconnaissance visits have also been made to the project areas. Public consultation has been carried out at several locations in each subproject road sections during initial surveys. In total over 40 consultation session were organized involving over 700 participants. It include 231 (31%) female and 520 (69%) male participants. Table 50 show the details of the public consultations carried out along various road sections.

Table 49: Subproject wise details of the Public consultation Sr. No. Name of Road Place / Date No of Participants Male Female Total

1 Singhoul village 12 6 18 Kharamseda Kirhai 2 Kontar village 30 13 43 Ramgarh Road 3 Bichhiya Kalan village 22 17 39

112

Sr. No. Name of Road Place / Date No of Participants Male Female Total

4 Bhishampur village 6 3 9 5 Itma village 10 8 18 6 Dhaurahara village 13 8 21 Jharkua Raigaon 7 Simaria village 15 7 22 Karsara Road 8 Raigoan village 18 5 23 9 Karsara village 11 7 18 10 Bhatura Bhadpur Barroh village / 03 Oct 2014 8 6 14 11 Barrakhurd Road Bhatura village / 03 Oct 2014 14 12 26 12 Asni village / 5 Jan 2015 11 3 14 13 Parsona village / 6 Jan 2015 13 3 16 14 Parsona Mada Road Karahiya village / 6 Jan 2015 10 4 14 15 Situl village / 6 Jan 2015 10 5 15 16 Raundi village / 6 Jan 2015 11 3 14 17 Ramgarh Mada Road Jeer village / 23 July 2015 19 10 29 18 Harphari village 9 3 12 19 Thapna village 8 2 10 20 Harphari Khaira Road Korsar kothar village 10 6 16 21 Korsar village 9 5 14 22 Barhat village 12 4 16 23 Lalmmati /14 Jan 2016 9 8 17 24 Chitrangi Garhwa Daura /14 Jan 2016 0 7 7 25 Road Ghoghra /14 Jan 2016 7 0 7 26 Ghadwa /14 Jan 2016 14 0 14 27 Girwa village 14 Jan 2015 11 3 14 28 Bargawan village 14 Jan 2015 12 2 14 Anuppur Jaitpur Road 29 Chakodiya village 15 Jan 2015 11 3 14 30 Kotri village 15 Jan 2015 11 3 14 31 Jaldi Tola 31 Dec 2014 9 5 14 32 Jarwahi village 01 Jan 2014 10 3 13 33 Gohparu Rasmohni Marjad village 01 Jan 2014 10 2 12 34 Budhar Road Kesauri village 31 Dec 2014 10 5 15 Bhikhampur village 01 Jan 35 11 4 15 2015 36 Madsa village 01 Jan 2015 10 4 14 37 Pasgarhi Devri Papredi village 17 11 28 38 Janakpur Road Budwa village 12 2 14 39 Sukhad village 11 3 14 40 Jhurai – Sarai Road Purail village / 7 Jan 2015 9 5 14 41 Chouri village 18 8 26 42 Sohagpur – Manpur Bhautara village 14 6 20 43 Road Bijauri village 11 3 14 44 kathar village 12 4 16 Total 520 231 751

Source: Field surveys during DPR preparation

1. ProjectStakeholders

279. All types of stakeholders were identified to ensure as wide coverage as possible.  Residents, shopkeepers and business people who live and work along the road specially the project affected persons  All type of road users/commuters 113

 Executing Agency, Construction Supervision Consultant and Implementing NGOs  Other government institutions whose remit includes areas or issues affected by the subproject (state environment and forest department, Pollution Control Board (PCB), Irrigation Department, Public Health Engineering (PHED) Department  The beneficiary community in general.  Thebeneficiarycommunity in general.

2. Consultation with Government Departments

280. Various officials consulted during IEE preparation included PWD and MPRDC Officials, State pollution control board for air, noise and water quality information, IMD for the climatic data, statistical officer for population and demographic profile, panchyat department for village level information, Survey of India for the toposheet requirement, revenue department for the land record information, PHQ officers for hand pump relocation and quality assessment, MPSEB offices for electric pole shifting etc.

281. These departments helped to provide various project related data and information which helped preparation of reports and data analysis.

3. Consultation with Local People and Beneficiaries

282. The informal consultation generally started with explaining the subprojects, followed by an explanation to potential impacts. Participant’s views were gathered with regard to all aspects of the environment which may have direct or indirect impact on local people. Key Issues discussed are:  Awareness and extent of the project and development components;  Benefits of the project for the economic and social upliftment of community;  Labour availability in the project area or requirement of outside labour involvement;  Local disturbances due to project construction work;  Necessity of tree felling etc. at project sites;  Impact on water bodies, water logging and drainage problem if any;  Environment and health aspects;  Flora and fauna of the project areas, and  Socio-economic standing of the local people.

283. The subprojects has immense acceptability among the local people. They perceive that in addition to providing all weather connectivity, the subproject roads will bring positive socioeconomic changes in the areas. Local people mainly discussed on the issues related to flooding, rehabilitation, resettlement, and road safety issues. The list of participants views and outcome of the consultations have been summarized in Table 51.

284. The Details of Participants and Public Consultation photographs are attached in Appendix 6. In addition information on the GRM procedures and formats in local language i.e. Hindi was shared with the local people as provided in Appendix-7.

114

Table 50:Summary of Issues Discussed and Measures Taken Location and Issues Discussed Measures Taken Participant Date At 44 villages  People are facing acute Total 751 of the sub problem related to poor Participant was project roads condition of the road. Proposed widening and Participated in the during field  Where the road passing strengthening of the road will consultation in survey through the settlements provide better level of services in which 520 male and there should be terms of improved riding quality 231 female was  provision of Speed breakers and smooth traffic flow. present. Suggestion viz. (i) design  There will be considerable shall take into hydrological reduction in the number of aspects into consideration accident and level of pollution. (ii) minimal loss of  Accessibility to social health structures (iii) adequate and educational infrastructure settlement and rehabilitation will increase through all- measures including weather road. provision of jobs to land  Generation of employment losers during construction phase of  Local people informed that the road. present road in some  The discussion generates. sections of this area  considerable awareness of the submerges during normal project . rainfall also. Adequate  As the proposed road shall be a measures shall be taken to widened one, it shall provide an avoid water logging during efficient public transportation normal rainfall. system besides.  They suggested that  ensuring reduction in existing alignment shall also congestion level be improved and maintained  The title holders shall also be properly. compensated as per ADB  Suggestion viz., Minimal guidelines. loss of structures, Adequate  Drainage system is mention in rehabilitation and built-up area and earthen resettlement ,measures drainage for rural area.  Area is one of the  Drainage system is mention in congested stretches due to built-up area and earthen that problem of traffic jam drainage for rural area. Road and accident is common. safety features like traffic signs,  Stress was put by the Overhead Sign Boards, Road community on adequate Illumination, Delineators, safety provisions to be  pavement marking, pedestrian made along the road path and rumble strips has particularly at locations of been included in the design. school,  Proper Rehabilitation measures  cattle underpass, provision will be taken for . Affected of bus stop and provision of Household’s and compensation green belt development will be as per market rate. Compensation should be as per market value.

285. Most of the people interviewed were well aware of the environmental conditions in and around their villages. A major percentage was ignorant about any deterioration in the air and noise quality due to expansion of existing highway. However, their major concern was related to the drain blockage and stagnant water at dig holes. The villagers are quite enthusiastic about 115

the proposed project as it will give fillip to rural economy and present them many employment opportunities during construction of project road. Overall positive approach towards the project is observed.

4. Results of Consultation with Local People

286. Most of the people interviewed strongly support the subproject work. The people living in the entire project area expect the different project elements to facilitate transport, employment, tourism, boost economic development and thereby provide direct, or indirect, benefits to them. In order to access the existing environment and likely impacts on surrounding population, an interview survey was carried out. A priority of the population was interviewed through a designed questionnaire. Precaution has been exercised during the survey to ensure that the priority interviewed is truly representative of the affected groups and the questions are worded so as not to generate a bias response.

287. It is observed from the interview survey that there is increased environmental awareness among the people. It can also be seen from Table 51 that about 90 percent of the persons are in the opinion that an environmental condition of the area is good. About 86 percent of the people are agreed that the quality of air, in the area is good; whereas, only about 5 to 10 percent responded feel that the environmental quality is being deteriorated. Poor road condition and vehicular emissions are the major sources they feel responsible for this. People are unaware about presence of archaeological, historical and cultural sites. There is no major history of natural disasters in the region and local people have mixed response about natural disasters. Overall, the general environmental conditions in the region are good and people have increased environmental awareness. Table 52 shows the result of public opinion survey carried out in the region.

Table 51: Peoples’ Perception about Environmental Scenario Positive Negative No Sr. No.ofpeople Question asked about response response response No. interviewed (%) (%) (%) Water quality of rivers, 1 88 9 3 ponds,wells,and canals 2 Noise qualityofthe area 89 9 2 3 Air qualityofthearea 86 0 14 4 Archaeological sites 751 0 95 5 5 Natural disaster 9 85 6 6 Rare species of animals 0 100 0 Culturaland birdsf sitesound i.e. market, 7 88 2 10 melas Note: Positive response shows that the overall environmental scenario in the area is good and wise versa. For rare species positive answer to question means species are presence.

288. Overall, most of the people interviewed strongly support the subprojects. The people living in the entire project areas expect the different project elements to facilitate transport, employment, tourism, boost economic development and thereby provide direct, or indirect, benefits to them. Construction camps may, however, put stress on local resources and the infrastructure in nearby communities. In addition, local people raised construction-process related grievances with the workers. This sometimes leads to aggression between residents and migrant workers. To prevent such problems, the contractor should provide the construction

116

camps with facilities such as proper housing, health care clinics, proper drinking water and timely payment. The use of local laborers during the construction will, of course, increase benefits to local peoples and minimise these problems. Wherever possible, such people should be employed.

C. Interaction with Local/National and International NGOs

289. In order to get independent views on the likely impacts of the subprojects, non- government organizations at local as well as regional level were consulted during the IEE process. Aspects such as conservation activities, presence of flora and fauna, likely project impacts and possible mitigation measures were discussed and views and suggestions from these NGO’s were incorporated in the EMP. Consultation will continue with these NGO’s during project implementation and operation.

D. Public Disclosure

290. The subproject EA will be responsible for the disclosure of this IEE in compliance to ADB’s Communication Policy 2011 and ADB SPS 2009. The IEE will be disclosed in the English language in the office of MPRDC. The report will also be made available to interested parties on request from the office of the MPRDC. Since this is Category B subproject, this IEE report will be disclosed to the public through the ADB website. This IEE report will also be made available to all stakeholders as part of the consultation process required under the SPS 2009.

117

VIII. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

291. The grievance and outcome related to the implementation of the subprojects, particularly regarding the environmental management plan will be acknowledged, evaluated, and responded to the complainant with corrective action proposed. The outcome shall also form part of the annual environmental monitoring reports that will be submitted to ADB. Complaints may be lodged verbally directly to the contractor or CSC or PIU at the site level. To the extent possible efforts will be made by the contractor, CSC or PIU to address these complaints immediately on site. Only those complaints that cannot be addressed immediately at the site level will be submitted to the Grievance Redress Committee (GRC). Necessary assistance for completing the complaint form or lodging a written complaint will be made to illiterate complainants by the respective receiver of the complaint. A Grievance GRC will be established at the MPRDC state level and at the PIU level to assure accessibility for Affected Persons. The GRCs are expected to resolve grievances of the eligible persons within a stipulated time. The decision of the GRCs will be binding, unless vacated by the court of law.

292. The State level GRC will comprise of the:

i) General Manager, MPRDC, Bhopal ii) Superintended Engineer, PWD, Bhopal iii) DGM, MPRDC, Bhopal iv) Manager (Environment & Social), MPRDC, Bhopal

293. The PIU level GRC will comprise of the:

i) Divisional Manager from MPRDC ii) Executive Engineer, local PWD office iii) A representative from local NGOs or a local person of repute and standing in the society, elected representative from Zila Parisad /District Council. iv) Two representative from affected people including vulnerable groups and women from a relevant agency which could be from the government, or NGO or local community

294. One of the above members in the PIU level GRC will be a woman. The GRC will continue to function, for the benefit of the APs, during the entire life of the project including the five year maintenance period. Figure 23 defines the process of the GRM. An information sheet on GRM procedures including a sample form for submitting complaints in the local language is attached in Appendix 7.

118

Complaints by individuals, Groups, or Complaints by People’s institutions representatives: political, religious, community

Step 1 GRC Secretary at divisional Level (Complaints to GRC in written form

Decision to be taken within 3 week of receipt Document in the Resolved of complaint Monitoring Report Simple issues Unresolved

Step 1 GRC meeting

Document in the Resolved Monitoring Report 6 Weeks Unresolved

Step 2 GRC meeting at State l Level

Decision to be taken Document in the Resolved within 3 week of receipt Monitoring Report of complaint Unresolved Complex issues

Decision of Step 2 GRC – Convey the decision to Public / Chairman and other members of Step 1GRC

GRC process ends

Figure 23: Grievance Redress Mechanism

119

IX. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

A. Introduction

296. The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is the synthesis of all proposed mitigation and monitoring actions, set to a time-frame with specific responsibility assigned and follow-up actions defined. It contains all the information for the proponent, the contractor and the regulatory agencies to implement the subprojects within a specified time-frame

297. This EMP consists of a set of mitigation, monitoring and institutional measures to be taken for the project to avoid, minimize and mitigate adverse environmental impacts and enhance positive impacts. The plan also includes the actions needed for the implementation of these measures. The major components of the Environmental Management Plan are:

 Mitigation of potentially adverse impacts;  monitoring of EMP implementation during project implementation and operation; and  Institutional arrangements to implement the EMP.

298. Considering the nature of the works and environmental setup along the selected subprojects, which is identical to all subprojects, four separate EMPs (Appendix 8) have been developed for each civil works contract package. Specific attention has been paid to the three subprojects in Singrauli district, which are passing through forest areas, by including additional clauses (items) in the EMP for these roads. Prior to start of construction work Environmental Experts of the CSC team in coordination with Contractor will update these EMPs to make it road specific EMP.

B. Objectives of Environmental Management Plan

299. The main objectives of this EMP are:  To ensure compliance with Asian Development Bank’s applicable safeguard policies, and regulatory requirements of Madhya Pradesh State and the Government of India;  To formulate avoidance, mitigation and compensation measures for anticipated adverse environmental impacts during construction and operation, and ensure that environmentally sound, sustainable and good practices are adopted; and  To stipulate monitoring and institutional requirements for ensuring safeguard compliance.

C. Impacts and Mitigation Measures

300. The identified environmental issues and suggested mitigation measures with institutional arrangements for implementation, supervision and monitoring have been provided in a matrix format in Appendix 8. However, anticipated potential impacts and suggested mitigation measures specific to the subprojects are summarised in following paragraphs. These mitigation measures will be implemented as part of these subprojects.

1. Impacts

301. Following are anticipated potential adverse environmental impacts from subprojects:

120

1. impacts on surrounding area due to tree cutting (3378) for the proposed improvement work along selected eleven subproject roads; 2. Temporary impact on land and air environment due to locating construction camp; 3. Temporary impact on land, air and water environment due to establishing and operating construction plants (Hot Mix Plant and Diesel Generator [DG] sets); 4. Impact on biophysical environment due to quarry operation; 5. Impact on air quality, water quality, drainage, road users due to construction activities of project road ; 6. Impact on land and water environment due to disposal of waste materials; and 7. Impact on occupational health and safety due to all onsite and offsite construction works.

2. Mitigation Measures

a. Compensatory Tree Plantation

302. The compensatory plan is being developed in consultation with local forest department. As per compensatory afforestation, the tree plantation will be done ten times of tree cutting (1:10 of tree cutting) as detailed in Table 53. Table 52: Details of Trees to be Cut and Planted Trees to be S. Length Tree to planted in Name of Road No. (Km) be cut consultation with Forest Dept 1 Kharamseda Kirhai Ramgarh 34.35 242 2420 2 Jharkua Raigaon Karsara 23.95 455 4550 3 Bhatura Bhadpur Barrakhurd 20.05 244 2440 4 Parsona Mada 24.39 54 540 5 Ramgarh Mada 19.87 376 3760 6 Harphari Khaira Misirgawan 25.99 586 5860 7 Chitrangi-Garhwa Road 22.67 254 2540 8 Anuppur Jaitpur Road 36.66 404 4040 9 Gohparu Rasmohni Budhar 39.94 264 2640 10 Pasgarhi Devri Janakpur 23.49 222 2220 11 Jhurai – Sarai 31.44 80 800 12 Sohagpur – Manpur 59.40 197 1970 Total 362.20 3378 33780

b. Slope Protection and Bio-engineering Measures

303. The bio-engineering measures are suitable for slope protection in hill sections. The following items have been suggested as bio-engineering measures for slope protection in hilly sections of the subproject roads.  Turning of slopes through rough grassing; and  Tree plantation along the hill section (slopes) of the subprojects road to control the soil erosion.

304. The above items as bio-engineering measures have been incorporated in EMP budget.

c. Excavated Road Side Debris and its Disposal 121

305. The provision has been made in cost estimate to use the roadway excavated materials as necessary for the construction of roads, which are as follows.  For all types of soil, such as ordinary rock, hard rock and  Excavation from drain and foundation of other structures.

306. As per above description, the Contractor will use the excavated road side material for construction of road. The rest unsuitable material will be disposed suitably. The lead and lift has been considered in cost estimates. The Contractor will not dispose the excavated unsuitable material generated from hill section to other side (valley side) of the subproject roads. Proper disposal plan will be prepared by the Contractor to dispose the unsuitable material generated from hill cutting/ road excavation.

d. Protection of Water Bodies

307. The surface water bodies along the subproject roads require protection during construction phase of the subproject roads particular at locations of river/stream crossing (Table 27 show the locations of the main water bodies/rivers along the subproject roads). The Contractor shall not disturb/ pollute these surface water bodies due to construction activities of the subproject roads. The Contractor will be responsible to protect these surface water bodies and extra payment for the same will not be given.

e. Re-development of Borrow Area

308. The items for redevelopment of borrow area such as preservation of top soil and re- application of stored top soil has been considered in proposed EMP cost. The Contractor will re- develop the borrow areas before closing of same. The estimated quantities for preservation and re-application of the top soil has been considered for redevelopment of borrow area.

f. Protection of Sensitive Receptors

309. Sensitive receptors along the subproject roads will be protected by implementing suitable measures such as timely scheduling of construction activities in these areas, provision of sign boards, appropriate noise barriers such as planting trees and / or raised boundary walls are adopted to minimize impacts. Table 26 show the locations of the sensitive receptors (schools, temples etc.) along the subproject roads. Specific mitigation measures as detailed in EMP matrix shall be implemented at these locations.

D. Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Program

310. Environmental monitoring is an essential tool for environmental management as it provides the basic information for rational management decisions. To ensure the effective implementation of mitigation measures and environmental management plan during construction and operation phase of the up gradation of subproject roads, it is essential that an effective Environmental Monitoring Plan be designed and followed.

311. Environmental monitoring program has the underlying objective to ensure that the intended environmental mitigations are realized and these results in desired benefits to the target population causing minimal deterioration to the environmental parameters. Such program targets proper implementation of the EMPs. The broad objectives are:  To evaluate the performance of mitigation measures proposed in the EMP.  To evaluate the adequacy of environmental assessment.

122

 To suggest ongoing improvements in management plan based on the monitoring and to devise fresh monitoring on the basis of the improved EMP.  To enhance environmental quality through proper implementation of suggested mitigation measures.  To meet the requirements of the existing environmental regulatory framework and community obligations.

1. Performance Indicators

312. The potential physical, biological and social components affecting the environment at critical locations serve as wider/overall Performance Indicators. However, the following specific environmental parameters can be quantitatively measured and compared over a period of time and are, therefore, selected as specific Performance Indicators (PIs) for monitoring because of their regulatory importance and the availability of standardized procedures and relevant expertise.  Air Quality with respect to PM2.5, PM10, CO, NOx and SO2 at selected location.  Water Quality with reference to DO, BOD, Oil and grease, COD, Suspended Solids and Turbidity, Alkalinity at crossing points on rivers/streams at selected points.  Noise levels at sensitive receptors (schools, hospitals, community/religious places).  Survival rates of trees planted as compensatory plantation to compensate for lost forestland and compensatory plantation raised for removal of roadside trees.

a. Ambient Air Quality (AAQ) Monitoring

313. Ambient air quality parameters recommended for monitoring road development subprojects are PM2.5, PM10, Carbon Monoxide (CO), Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) and Sulphur Dioxide (SO2). These are to be monitored, right from the commencement of construction activity at selected locations of plants and machinery, crushers on sites, excavation works etc. Data should be generated once in a season excluding monsoon at the monitoring locations in accordance with the revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards formulated by MoEFCC in 2009 (Appendix-3).

b. Water Quality Monitoring

314. The physical and chemical parameters recommended for analysis of water quality relevant to road development subprojects are pH, total solids, total dissolved solids, total suspended solids, oil and grease, COD, Chloride, Lead, Zinc and Cadmium. The location, duration and the pollution parameters to be monitored and the responsible institutional arrangements are given in the Environmental Monitoring Plan. The monitoring of the water quality is to be carried out at locations identified along the subproject roads during construction and operation phase. The Indian Standard Specifications – IS10500: 1991 is given in Appendix – 5.

c. Noise Level Monitoring

315. The measurements for monitoring noise levels would be carried out at sensitive receptors and construction sites along the subproject roads. The Ambient Noise Standards formulated by Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) in 1989 or the standards by State Pollution Control Board of Madhya Pradesh if such standards are stringent than those of the 123

CPCB are to be complied. The CPCB standards are given in Appendix – 4. Sound pressure levels would be monitored on twenty-four hour basis. Noise should be recorded at “A” weighted frequency using a “slow time response mode” of the measuring instrument.

d. Success of Re-vegetation

316. The subprojects involves widening and up-gradation including construction of cross drainage structures, hence these will require felling of trees. Such lost vegetation will be required to be replaced by compensatory plantation. As per policy of the State Government norms 10 trees have to be planted for each tree removed. These compensatory plantations will have to be monitored by the implementing agency with the help of the Forest Department. Such monitoring will be conducted through random samples. Such sampling should cover at least 5% of the area planted up.

E. Environmental Reporting System

317. The monitoring plan covering various performance indicators, frequency and institutional arrangements of the project in the construction and operation stages, along with the estimated cost, is summarized in Appendix 8.

318. The reporting system will operate linearly with the contractor who is at the lowest rank of the implementation system reporting to the CSC, who in turn shall report to the PIU. All reporting by the contractor and CSC shall be on a quarterly basis. The PIU shall be responsible for preparing targets for each of the identified EMP activities.

319. The compliance monitoring and the progress reports on environmental components may be clubbed together and submitted to the PIU quarterly during the implementation period. The operation stage monitoring reports may be annual or biannual provided the Project Environmental Completion Report shows that the implementation was satisfactory. Otherwise, the operation stage monitoring reports will have to be prepared as specified in the said Project Environmental Completion Report.

320. Responsibilities for overseeing will rest with the CSC’s staff reporting to the PIU. Capacity to quantitatively monitor relevant ecological parameters would be an advantage but monitoring will primarily involve ensuring that actions taken are in accordance with contract and specification clauses, and specified mitigation measures as per the EMP.

321. During the implementation period, a compliance report may include description of the items of EMP, which were not complied with by any of the responsible agencies. It would also report to the management about actions taken to enforce compliance. It may however, be noted that certain items of the EMP might not be possibly complied with for a variety of reasons. The intention of the compliance report is not to suppress these issues but to bring out the circumstances and reasons for which compliance was not possible (such as jurisdictional issues). This would help in reinforcing the implementation of the EMP.

322. Photographic records will also be established to provide useful environmental monitoring tools. A full record will be kept as part of normal contract monitoring. Reporting and Monitoring Systems for various stages of construction and related activities have been proposed to ensure timely and effective implementation of the EMP.

124

323. The reporting system has been prepared for each of the stage of road construction namely:  Pre construction stage  Construction Stage  Operation Stage

324. This reporting shall be done through:  Reporting by the Contractor to the CSC  Reporting by CSC to PIU.

325. The stage-wise reporting system is detailed out in the following Table 54.

Table 53: Stage-wise Reporting System of PIU Construction Project Implementation Contractor Supervision Consultant Unit (PIU) (CSC) Format* Item Oversee / Reporting to No. Implementation Reporting Field Environment and Reporting Supervision to PIU Compliance Officer of to CSC Monitoring PIU C1 Monitoring Before start - Quarterly - Quarterly of of work construction site and construction camp C2 Target - As required After - After sheet for Monitoring Monitoring Pollution Monitoring C3 Target - Monthly Quarterly Quarterly Bi-annual sheet for roadside plantation C4 Target - Monthly Quarterly Quarterly Bi-annual sheet for monitoring of cleaning water bodies O1 Target - - - As per After sheet for monitoring Monitoring Pollution plan Monitoring O2 Target - - - Quarterly After sheet for Monitoring survival reporting of roadside plantation O3 Target - - - Quarterly After sheet for Monitoring 125

Construction Project Implementation Contractor Supervision Consultant Unit (PIU) (CSC) Format* Item Oversee / Reporting to No. Implementation Reporting Field Environment and Reporting Supervision to PIU Compliance Officer of to CSC Monitoring PIU monitoring of cleaning water bodies Formats will be developed and provided by supervision consultant to the contractor.

F. Institutional Requirements

326. The Executing Agency for the project will be GoMP through MPRDC. MPRDC is wholly owned by GoMP and has been equipped with adequate capacity to implement the project. A Chief Engineer (CE) at MPRDC headquarter has been designated as person in charge for project implementation. The Environmental and Social Cell (ESC) at MPRDC headquarters, reporting to the Chief Engineer, will be responsible for ensuring compliance with environmental and social safeguards of all roads under the project. This cell currently has only one officer to cover both social and environment safeguards. To support this officer, two more social safeguard officers and one environmental safeguard officer will be appointed or recruited. This will allow the ESC to have a total of four officers, two for social safeguards and two for environment safeguards.

327. MPRDC has ten division offices (Bhopal, Jabalpur, Sagar, Gwalior I, Gwalior II, Ujjain, Indore I, Indore II, Rewa I, and Rewa II) acting as Project Implementation Units (PIUs). Each PIU is headed by a Divisional Manager (Tech.) who is responsible for project implementation at the field level. Each PIU will be responsible for one or more contracts depending on the location of the sub projects, and one project manager will be assigned for each contract package. The project manager will be delegated adequate technical and administrative authority for expeditious project implementation. In each PIU one of the Assistant Engineers or Managers under the Divisional Manager will be appointed as the social and environment safeguards focal person. MPRDC will engage Construction Supervision Consultants to act as the engineer for the construction contracts. An environmental specialist from the CSC will provide technical support to MPRDC and the PIU for implementation of environment safeguards under the project. The detailed responsibilities of MPRDC, PIUs, CSC, contractor and ADB are provided in the following sections.

1. MPRDC’s Responsibilities

328. MPRDC will be responsible for the following:

i. Ensure that Project complies with ADB's SPS and GOI’s laws and regulations; ii. Prepare IEE reports including EMP as may be required and hire an environmental consultant as required; iii. Prepare the Rapid Environmental Assessment screening checklist and forward this checklist to ADB for evaluation and confirmation of the project category; iv. Based on the confirmation of the environmental categorization of the subprojects, prepare TORs to conduct IEE studies including preparation of EMP

126

and Environmental Monitoring Plan in accordance with the environmental policy principles and safeguard requirements under the ADB SPS; v. Ensure that the preparation of environmental studies will be completed with meaningful consultations with affected people and other concerned stakeholders, including civil society throughout the project preparation stages as required by the ADB SPS; vi. Undertake initial review of the IEE and EMP reports to ensure its compliance with the Government’s and ADB’s requirement; vii. Review the budgetary needs for complying with the Government’s and ADB’s requirements on environment safeguards and ensure the proposed budget is in line with EMP; viii. Obtain necessary consents or permissions (e.g. environment permission, forest clearance) from relevant Government Agencies to minimize risks to the environment and mitigate environmental impacts associated. Also ensure that all necessary regulatory clearances will be obtained prior to commencing any civil work of the subproject; ix. Submit to ADB the final IEE including EMP reports with consent letter for disclosure of the report on the ADB website; x. Ensure that the EMP which includes required mitigation measures and monitoring requirements forms part of bidding document after seeking concurrence from ADB. EMP items may be included in the Bill of Quantities (BOQ) as necessary. For example if a subproject is required to construct noise barriers, the costs will need to be included in the BOQ; xi. Ensure that contractors have access to the IEE report including EMP of the subprojects; xii. Organize training and awareness programs on implementation of environment safeguards for relevant staff of MPRDC, PIU, CSC and contractors; xiii. Ensure that contractors understand their responsibilities to mitigate environmental problems associated with their construction activities; xiv. Ensure and Monitor that the EMP including Environmental Monitoring Plan will be properly implemented; xv. In case of unanticipated environmental impacts during project implementation stage arrange to prepare and implement an updated EMP to account for such impacts after seeking concurrence from ADB. The updating shall be carried out after due consultation with the stake holders; xvi. In case during project implementation a subproject needs to be realigned, review the environmental classification and revise accordingly, and identify whether supplementary IEE study is required. If it is required, prepare the TOR for undertaking supplementary IEE and hire an environment consultant to carry out the study; xvii. Ensure that construction workers work under safe and healthy working environment in accordance with the World Bank EHS guidelines relating to occupational health and safety; xviii. Ensure effective implementation of Grievance Redress Mechanism to address affected people’s concerns and complaints, promptly, using understandable and transparent process that is gender responsive, culturally appropriate, and readily accessible to all segments of the affected people; xix. Submit annual monitoring reports (template provided in Appendix 13) for all subprojects on the implementation of EMPs to ADB for disclosure on the ADB website; and xx. Ensure proper implementation of corrective action plan if identified in the 127

monitoring report;

2. PIU Responsibilities

329. Each PIU will be responsible for the following activities: i. Ensure that Project complies with ADB's SPS and GOI’s laws and regulations; ii. Obtain necessary consents or permissions (e.g. forest clearance, no objection certificate) from relevant Government Agencies. Also ensure that all necessary regulatory clearances will be obtained prior to commencing any civil work of the subproject; iii. Ensure that contractors have access to the IEE report including EMP of the subprojects; iv. Ensure that contractors understand their responsibilities to mitigate environmental problems associated with their construction activities; v. Participate in training and awareness programs on implementation of environment safeguards and organize further on the job or subject specific training for the contractor during project implementation as necessary with the support of the CSC environmental specialist; vi. Conduct regular on site monitoring to ensure proper implementation of the EMP including Environmental Monitoring Plan; vii. Verify and approve monitoring checklists and/or reports that will be prepared and submitted by the CSC; viii. In case of unanticipated environmental impacts during project implementation stage, identify the need to prepare and implement an updated EMP to account for such impacts after seeking concurrence from ADB; ix. Ensure that construction workers work under safe and healthy working environment in accordance with the World Bank EHS guidelines relating to occupational health and safety; x. Ensure effective implementation of Grievance Redress Mechanism in accordance with the steps given in figure 12 to address affected people’s concerns and complaints, promptly, using an understandable and transparent process that is gender responsive, culturally appropriate, and readily accessible to all segments of the affected people; xi. Ensure timely submission of annual monitoring reports for all sub-projects on the implementation of EMPs to MPRDC for further submission to ADB for disclosure on the ADB website; and xii. Ensure proper implementation of corrective action plan if identified in the monitoring report.

3. CSC Responsibilities

330. The CSC of each package will be responsible for the following activities: i. Ensure that Project complies with ADB's SPS and GOI’s laws and regulations; ii. Provide necessary technical advice and support to the PIU and/or contractor to obtain consents or permissions (e.g. forest clearance, no objection certificate) from relevant Government Agencies. Also ensure that all necessary regulatory clearances will be obtained prior to commencing any civil work of the subproject; iii. Ensure that contractors have access to the IEE report including EMP of the subprojects; iv. Ensure that contractors understand their responsibilities to mitigate

128

environmental problems associated with their construction activities; v. Closely coordinate and communicate with the contractor to facilitate implementation of all mitigation measures identified in EMP; vi. Conduct training and awareness programs on implementation of environment safeguards for MPRDC, PIU and the contractors during the pre-construction stage and further organize on the job or subject specific training for the contractor during project implementation as necessary; vii. Conduct regular on site monitoring to ensure proper implementation of the EMP including Environmental Monitoring Plan; viii. Prepare monitoring checklists and/or reports based on the site monitoring and submit them to the PIU for approval; ix. In case of unanticipated environmental impacts during project implementation stage, upon the advice from the PIU and/or MPRDC prepare an updated EMP to account for such impacts after seeking concurrence from ADB; x. Ensure that construction workers work under safe and healthy working environment; xi. Facilitate effective implementation of the Grievance Redress Mechanism in accordance with the steps given in figure 12 to address affected people’s concerns and complaints, promptly, using an understandable and transparent process that is gender responsive, culturally appropriate, and readily accessible to all segments of the affected people, and xii. Prepare annual monitoring reports for all sub-projects on the implementation of EMPs for submission to PIU and MPRDC and further submission to ADB for disclosure on the ADB website.

4. Contractor’s Responsibilities

331. The contractor will be responsible for the following activities: i. Ensure that adequate budget provisions are made for implementing all mitigation measures specified in the EMP; ii. Participate in training and awareness programs on implementation of environment safeguards; iii. Identify further needs for conduction of on the job or subject specific training during project implementation by the CSC or MPRDC or PIU; iv. Obtain necessary environmental permission etc. from relevant agencies as specified by IEE for project road works, quarries, hot-mix plant etc. prior to commencement of civil works contracts; v. Implement all mitigation measures as given in the EMP in the contract documents; vi. Ensure that all workers, site agents, including site supervisors and management participate in training sessions organized by the PIU, MPRDC or CSC; vii. Ensure compliance with environmental statutory requirements and contractual obligations; viii. Respond promptly to grievances raised by the local community or any stakeholder and implement environmental corrective actions or additional environmental mitigation measures as necessary, and ix. Based on the results of EMP monitoring, cooperate with the PIU and CSC to implement environmental corrective actions and corrective action plans, as necessary.

5. ADB’s Responsibilities 129

332. ADB is responsible for the following: i. Review REA checklist and endorse or modify the project classification proposed by the MPRDC; ii. Review IEE reports and disclose draft and final reports through ADB’s website as required; iii. Issue subproject’s approval based on the respective IEE reports; iv. Monitor implementation of environment safeguard requirements under the project through due diligence missions; v. Provide assistance to MPRDC, if required, in carrying out its responsibilities for implementing environment safeguards and for building capacity for safeguard compliance; and vi. Review and approve annual environmental monitoring reports submitted by MPRDC and disclose them on the ADB website.

6. Institutional Capacity Building

333. To ensure that all parties clearly understand their role and responsibilities for implementing environment safeguards under the project, the following training and awarenessprogramme is proposed: i. Awareness programme on environmental issues associated with construction and improvement of road projects and legislative compliance requirements.  Target audience: designated engineers from field units, contractor’s  Faculty: Environmental Expert and Environment Expert of CSC.  No. of Programmes: Minimum one per contract package

ii. EMP and EMoP implementation requirements, its benefits and roles of different level and functions.  Target audience: designated engineers from field units, contractor’s officials, and key workers, other officials of MPRDC associated for the project.  Faculty: EE and Environment Expert of CSC.  No of Programmes : Minimum one per contract package

G. Environmental Management Budget

334. An environmental management budget of INR 78,499,000 (Indian Rupees Seventy eight million four hundred ninety nine thousand only) (US$ 1.18 million) has been estimated for implementation of the environmental management plan. This budget also includes cost of environmental monitoring and associated trainings. A detail of environmental management budget is given in Table 55

130

Table 54: Environmental Management Cost Estimate Sl No Item Description Qty. Unit Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.) Responsibility A Forest Clearance and Compensatory Afforestation Compensatory afforestation and avenue plantation PIU through Forest A.1 33780 No. 1000 33780000 @1:10 trees including 3 year maintenance Department B Environmental Monitoring Ambient air quality monitoring during construction and operations phases (3 times in a year for 3 years or B.1 construction period 3 sites & Five years during 504 No. 9000 4536000 operation/defect liability period, once in a year at three sites) i.e 42 numbers in each road Ambient noise level monitoring during construction and operations phases (3 times in a year for 3 years or B.2 construction period 3 sites & Five years during 504 No. 3000 1512000 operation/defect liability period, once in a year at three sites) i.e 42 numbers in each road PIU through Water quality monitoring of surface water during approved monitoring construction and operations phases (3 times in a year for B.3 324 No. 5000 1620000 Agency 3 years or construction period at 3 location sites) i.e 27 numbers in each road Water quality monitoring of drinking water during construction and operations phases (3 times in a year for B.4 81 No. 5000 405000 3 years or construction period at 3 location sites) for each roads i.e 27 numbers in each road Soil quality monitoring during construction and operations phases (3 times in a year for 3 years or B.5 324 No. 10000 3240000 construction period at 3 location sites) i.e 27 numbers in each road C Noise Barrier at Sensitive Location Provide the Noise barrier at sensitive areas like schools and temples. The noise barriers of hollow brick 14884000 Contractor through C.1 wall/reinforced concrete panels with height of 3.5m. The 7442 Rm 2000 BOQ design of the noise barrier shall be approved by the engineer in charge. 131

Sl No Item Description Qty. Unit Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.) Responsibility D Solid Waste Management Solid Waste Management during entire project period (1 PIU through D.1 time in a month for 3 years or construction period) i.e 36 432 No. 3000/; month 1296000 approved monitoring numbers in each road agency E Dust Suppression Dust Suppression along the entire project length three 2000/- per PIU through E.1 tankers in a day for 240 Days i.e 720 numbers in each 8640 No. day per 17280000 approved monitoring road tanker agency F Environmental Training PIU through Training at site: Three training sessions during per 50000 per F.1 36 1800000 Supervision construction period for each roads sessions session Consultant TOTAL COST 80353000

132

X. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

335. The subprojects proposed for the improvement are classified as environment Category B & C projects as per ADB SPS requirements. As per GOI requirements Major District Roads do not fall in the purview of EIA Notification 2006 of MoEFCC. Therefore as per GOI norms environmental clearance is not required for these subprojects. For ADB the categorization has been done based on environmental screening and assessment of likely impacts. While the environmental assessment ascertains that it is unlikely to cause any major significant environmental impacts, few impacts were identified attributable to the proposed subprojects, all of which are localized and temporary in nature and easy to mitigate.

336. Factors contributing to minimal impacts include, widening of the subproject roads confined within the available RoW, presence of no sensitive environmental issue like wildlife sanctuary, national park, bio reserve, with 10 km from the subprojects road and most of water body crossed by the roads are non-perennial in nature except which are already bridged.

337. Three road sections covering a total of 362.2 km and some km section of road length passes through reserve forest. There are no other ecologically sensitive areas along the subproject roads neither there are any archaeological/protected monument located in the vicinity of subproject corridors. The land use pattern around the proposed alignments is predominantly agricultural except in three road sections where land use predominantly mix of forest and agriculture land.

338. The potential adverse impacts of the road sections upgrading are:  Impacts on surrounding area due to tree cutting (3378) for the proposed widening;  Temporary impact on land and air environment due to locating construction camp;  Temporary impact on land, air and water environment due to establishing and operating construction plants (Hot Mix Plant and Diesel Generator [DG] sets);  Impacts on roadside flora and fauna particularly on sections of road passing through forest area;  Impact on air quality, water quality, drainage, road users due to construction activities of project road;  Impact on land and water environment due to improper disposal waste water and improper disposal of solid waste generated from camps and construction activites; and  Impact on occupational health and safety due to all on-site and off-site construction works.

339. Measures such as use of EFRC i.e. slope protection measures are proposed to minimize the impacts of slope instability, compensatory afforestation @ 1:10 ratio, engineering alternatives to limit impacts on forest areas etc. are proposed to minimize the potential impacts.

340. Besides, series of mitigation measures have been proposed that are described in the IEE Report and addressed comprehensively in the environmental management plan. These include use of spoil disposal areas to minimize destruction of forests along the alignment, proper sizing of hydraulic structures to assure adequate capacity and prevent destruction of adjacent land, provision of sign boards along forest areas and other precious ecological zones, identification of vulnerable community infrastructure that must be preserved or replaced under construction contracts, limits on location and access of workers and other provisions regarding 133

construction to assure minimum impact, and other basic provisions on air pollution control, noise control, waste management as found in the EMP. All the above observations and mitigation measures will be included in the tender documents for contract works.

341. Application of these measures in parallel with MoRTH environmentally friendly road construction practices will reduce significantly any potential environmental impact. Impacts remaining on the physical environment (air and water pollution) are temporary and often occur away from the presence of people.

342. A systematic approach for surveillance and monitoring is provided by means of a management framework, and monitoring and reporting protocol. In general, the subprojects received good support from local people. The local people appreciated that besides providing an all-weather efficient connectivity to large rural populations and improving the traffic scenario in the region, it will bear out several other socio-economic positive benefits. Follow-up public consultation is intended to provide future input to the identification of environmental impact during the construction phase as well as a grievance redress mechanism for project affected persons. The EMP is a living document and the same will be revised if necessary during subproject implementation or if there is any change in the subproject design and with approval of ADB during the construction period. The environmental mitigation measures are itemized in the EMP and the EA and IA shall ensure that EMP and EMoP are included in Bill of Quantity (BOQ) and forms part of bid document and civil works contracts for each package.

343. Before the start of civil works for the any section of the subproject roads, the project proponent (MPRDC) must obtain necessary clearances / permits from statutory authorities

134 Appendix 1

Appendix 1: ADB’s Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Checklist

Country/Project Title: India / Madhya Pradesh District Roads II Sector Project (12 road sections)

Sector Division: SARD - SATC

Screening Questions Yes No Remarks A. PROJECT SITING IS THE PROJECT AREA ADJACENT TO OR WITHIN ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS? . Cultural heritage site X . Protected Area X There are no environmentally sensitive/ protected areas exist along the 12 subproject roads. Mitigation measures are included in the EMP to avoid impacts on flora and fauna in the forest areas. MPRDC will obtain necessary clearances/permits from statutory authority at State Level. . Wetland X . Mangrove X . Estuarine X . Buffer zone of protected area X . Special area for protecting biodiversity X

B. POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS WILL THE PROJECT CAUSE… . encroachment on historical/cultural areas; X The topography of project road is mainly disfiguration of landscape by road embankments, plain.There is no encroachment of historical cuts, fills, and quarries? places. However, some small temples existalong the project road which may get impacted.Since road widening will be confined to available ROW, no change in landscape is expected. Opening of new Quarries is not envisaged. Only operational and licensed quarry will be used for road construction. Earth material will be sourced from pre identified areas (located within 15 to 20 Km from the road) and with the consent of land owner. All borrow areas will be suitably rehabilitated. . encroachment on precious ecology (e.g. sensitive X or protected areas)? . alteration of surface water hydrology of X Subproject areas are low rainfall and it is not waterways crossed by roads, resulting in prone to floods. However some rivers crosses increased sediment in streams affected by the project roads. Controlled construction increased soil erosion at construction site? activities will ensure sediment discharge into streams. . deterioration of surface water quality due to silt X During construction period suitable mitigation runoff and sanitary wastes from worker-based measures will be required to control the silt camps and chemicals used in construction? runoff.

Adequate Sanitary facilities and drainage in the workers camps will help to avoid this possibility. As the construction activity in this project will not contain any harmful ingredients, no impact on surface water quality is anticipated. . increased local air pollution due to rock crushing, X With appropriate mitigation measures and use cutting and filling works, and chemicals from of most modern environment friendly asphalt processing? equipments/machineries air pollution shall be reduced to permissible levels. Appendix 1 135

Screening Questions Yes No Remarks . risks and vulnerabilities related to occupational X Possible. With appropriate mitigation measures health and safety due to physical, chemical, such risks would be minimized. biological, and radiological hazards during project construction and operation during project construction and operation? . noise and vibration due to blasting and other civil X Short term minor impact may occur during works? construction period, Suitable mitigation measures will be required to minimize the adverse effects . dislocation or involuntary resettlement of people? X Improvement work will be restricted to existing ROW. Therefore resettlement is not required. . dislocation and compulsory resettlement of X Improvement work will be restricted to existing people living in right-of-way? ROW. Therefore resettlement is not required.

. disproportionate impacts on the poor, women and X Possible. Gender Action Plan and Indigenous children, Indigenous Peoples or other vulnerable People Development Plan shall be prepared as groups? part of the Project. . other social concerns relating to inconveniences X Imposing of appropriate mitigation measures in in living conditions in the project areas that may contract agreement to keep the air pollution trigger cases of upper respiratory problems and within permissible levels will keep a check on stress? this problem. . hazardous driving conditions where construction X To minimized the impact suitable traffic interferes with pre-existing roads? management plan will be required . poor sanitation and solid waste disposal in X Proper provisions for sanitation, health care and construction camps and work sites, and possible solid waste disposal facilities will be available in transmission of communicable diseases (such as the contract documents to avoid such STI's and HIV/AIDS) from workers to local possibility. populations? Workers will be made aware about communicable diseases . creation of temporary breeding habitats for X diseases such as those transmitted by mosquitoes and rodents? . accident risks associated with increased vehicular X Adoption of suitable traffic signage system at traffic, leading to accidental spills of toxic sensitive places will reduce such possibility. materials? . increased noise and air pollution resulting from X Due to improvement in Riding Quality & Comfort traffic volume? in driving due to unidirectional traffic such pollution will be reduced. Mitigation measures along with monitoring plan will be required . increased risk of water pollution from oil, grease X Controlled construction activities and proper and fuel spills, and other materials from vehicles drainage system will reduce this possibility. using the road? . social conflicts if workers from other regions or X Not anticipated. Local labors would be hired to countries are hired? the extent possible. . large population influx during project construction X Possible. and operation that causes increased burden on social infrastructure and services (such as water supply and sanitation systems)? . risks to community health and safety due to the X Possible. EMP shall be followed to minimize this transport, storage, and use and/or disposal of risk. materials such as explosives, fuel and other chemicals during construction and operation? . community safety risks due to both accidental and X Not anticipated. natural causes, especially where the structural elements or components of the project are accessible to members of the affected community or where their failure could result in injury to the community throughout project construction, operation and decommissioning.

136 Appendix 1

A Checklist for Preliminary Climate Risk Screening Country/Project Title: Sector : Subsector: Division/Department: Screening Questions Score Remarks14 Location and Is siting and/or routing of the project (or its components) likely 0 Design of to be affected by climate conditions including extreme project weather related events such as floods, droughts, storms, landslides? Would the project design (e.g. the clearance for bridges) need 0 to consider any hydro-meteorological parameters (e.g., sea- level, peak river flow, reliable water level, peak wind speed etc.)? Materials and Would weather, current and likely future climate conditions 0 Maintenance (e.g. prevailing humidity level, temperature contrast between hot summer days and cold winter days, exposure to wind and humidity hydro-meteorological parameters likely affect the selection of project inputs over the life of project outputs (e.g. construction material)? Would weather, current and likely future climate conditions, 0 and related extreme events likely affect the maintenance (scheduling and cost) of project output(s) ? Performance Would weather/climate conditions, and related extreme 0 of project events likely affect the performance (e.g. annual power outputs production) of project output(s) (e.g. hydro-power generation facilities) throughout their design life time? Options for answers and corresponding score are provided below: Response Score Not Likely 0 Likely 1 Very Likely 2 Responses when added that provide a score of 0 will be considered low risk project. If adding all responses will result to a score of 1-4 and that no score of 2 was given to any single response, the project will be assigned a medium risk category. A total score of 5 or more (which include providing a score of 1 in all responses) or a 2 in any single response, will be categorized as high risk project.

Result of Initial Screening (Low, Medium, High):______Low_____

Other Comments:______Prepared by: ______

14 If possible, provide details on the sensitivity of project components to climate conditions, such as how climate parameters are considered in design standards for infrastructure components, how changes in key climate parameters and sea level might affect the siting/routing of project, the selection of construction material and/or scheduling, performances and/or the maintenance cost/scheduling of project outputs. Appendix 2 137

Appendix 2: List of Proposed Road Sections and Packages

No. of Length Package Packages No. of Roads District (Km) Length (km) included Package 4 Sanwer Chadravatiganj, Gautampura road Indore 33.94 33.94 Podar Barha Sukhakhairi Road Narsinghpur 23.57 70 Package 6 Gadarwara-Gotetoria road Narsinghpur 13.57

Kareli-Singpur- Dangidhana Road Narsinghpur 32.86

Khairlianji-Agasi Road Balaghat 28.96 87.96 Lal Barra- Samnapur Road Balaghat 8.4 Package 12 Rampayali-Garra Chouki road Balaghat 27.56

SitapathaourMahakaipar-Goreghat Road Balaghat 23.04

Teothar-Shakargarh Road Rewa 14.6 48.44 Package 15 Bahera Dabar Piprahi Jarkud Road Rewa 19.7

Nai Garhi Garh Road Rewa 14.14

Subtotal 240.34 240.36 Kharamseda Kirhai Ramgarh Road Satna 34.35 78.35 Package 16 Jharkua Raigaon Karsara Road Satna 23.95

Bhatura Bhadpur Barrakhurd Road Satna 20.05

Parsona Mada Road Singrauli 24.39 75.7 Package 18 Ramgarh Mada Road Singrauli 19.87

Jhurai – Sarai Road Singrauli 31.44

Harphari Khaira Misirgawan via Shivpurva Singrauli 25.99 48.66 Package 17 Road Chitrangi-Garhwa Road Singroli 22.67

Anuppur & Anuppur Jaitpur Road 36.66 100.09 Shahdol Package 20 Gohparu Rasmohni Budhar (via Bathiya) Shahdol 39.94 Road Pasgarhi Devri Janakpur Road Shahdol 23.49

Package 19 Sohagpur – Manpur Road Umaria 59.4 59.4 Subtotal 362.2 362.2 Samnapur-Bilhera-NanhiDeori-Narayanpur Sagar 45.4 84.91 Road Package 7 Maharajpur-Sahejpur Road Sagar 24.45

Kesli-Sahejpur Road Sagar 15.06

Garhpahera-Dhamoni Road Sagar 35.33 88.96 Barodiya-Dhamoni Road Sagar 19.81 Package 8 Noniya-Madanpur Road Sagar 2

Rajwas – Khurai (MDR) Road Sagar 31.82

Chhatarpur-Bikrampur-Rajnagar Road Chhatarpur 10.24 102.17 Bariyachoki-Lugasi-GarhiMalhera Road Chhatarpur 15.54

Package 10 Rajnagar-Bachhon Road Chhatarpur 23.85

Bamitha (Rajnagar)-Dumra Road Chhatarpur 28.07

Khaptiya-banspahadi Road Chhatarpur 24.47

Barghat-Kanhiwada road Seoni 21.79 78.62 Package 11 Dharna-Asta-Dondiwada-Dharmakua Seoni 26.23

Waraseoni-Katangi road Balaghat 30.6

Khatakia to Suthaliya via NH-3, Kumbhraj, Package 1 Barod, Mragwas, Batawda, Chanchoda, Guna 70.79 70.79 Binaganj, Teligaon Sirsod-Pichhore road Shivapuri 31.24 57.57 Package 2 Narwar-Chitori to Amola road Shivapuri 26.33

Mungawali-Malahargarh road Ashok Nagar 16.72 62.31 Piprod-Thubon road Ashok Nagar 7.74 Package 3 Belai-Kareela Mata Mandir road Ashok Nagar 17.72

Bhounrasa-Malhargarh road Vidisha 20.13

138 Appendix 2

No. of Length Package Packages No. of Roads District (Km) Length (km) included Chourai-Panjara-Chand road Chindwara 17.22 76.52 Package 14 Chand-Bichhua-Khamarpani road Chindwara 59.3

Subtotal 621.85 621.85 Package 5 Bijawar-Kataphod—Satwas-Khategaon Ujjain 55.17 55.17 Road Package 8 Rajwas – Khurai (MDR) Road Sagar 31.82 31.82 (extra road) Total Subtotal 1279.56 1279.56

Note: Totals may not exactly match because of rounding

Appendix 3 139

Appendix 3: Comparison of World Bank and GoI Ambient Air Quality Standards

A comparison between the ambient air quality requirements between the World Bank (WB) Environment, Health and Safety (EHS) guidelines and the National Ambient Air Quality standards (NAAQS) under the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 of GOI as given in table below shows that the NAAQS has requirements on three more parameters (Pb, Co and NH3) in comparison to the WB EHS. The NAAQS has differentiated standards for two types of areas: i) industrial, residential, rural and other areas and ii) ecologically sensitive areas. The WB EHS has guidelines values which are the required standards but allows for gradual compliance to the guideline values through staged interim targets. Most WB EHS guideline requirements are more stringent than NAAQS except for the NOx one year average in ecologically sensitive areas where the NAAQS requirements are more stringent.

Table 1: Ambient Air Quality standards of WB EHS Vs. the GOI NAAQS Ambient Air Averaging WB Guideline Value GOI Standards for GoI Ecologically Quality Period Industrial, Sensitive Area Parameter Residential, Rural (notified by Central and Other Areas Government) Sulfur dioxide 24-hr 125 (Interim target 1) 3 (SO2) (ug/m ) 50 (Interim target 2) 20 (guideline) 80 80 10 min 500 (guideline) Annual None 50 20 Nitrogen 1 Year 40 (guideline) 40 30 dioxide (NO2) 24 Hour None 80 80 3 (ug/m ) 1 Hour 200 (guideline)

PM10 70 (Interim target 1) 3 1 Year (ug/m ) 50 (Interim target 2) 30 (Interim target 3) 20 (guideline) 60 60 24-hr 150 (Interim target 1) 100 (Interim target 2) 75 (Interim target 3) 50 (guideline) 100 100 3 PM2.5 (ug/m ) 1 year 35 (Interim target 1) 25 (Interim target 2) 15 (Interim target 3) 10 (guideline) 40 40 24-Hour 75 (Interim target 1) 50 (Interim target 2) 37.5 (Interim target 3) 25 (guideline) 60 60

Ozone (O3) 8-hr daily max 160 (Interim target 1) 3 (ug/m ) 100 (guideline) 100 100 Lead (Pb) Annual 0.5 0.5 µg/m3) 24 hours 1.0 1.0 Carbon 8 hours 2000 2000 Monoxide (CO) µg/m3 1 hour 4000 4000 Ammonia Annual 100 100 3 (NH3) µ/m 24 hours 400 400

Appendix 4 140

Appendix 4: Comparison of WB EHS and GoI Ambient Noise Level Standards

A comparison on noise level requirements between the WB EHS guidelines and the NAAQS under the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 of GOI as given in table B shows that the required levels are equal for residential, institutional and educational areas. The NAAQS requirements for commercial areas are more stringent while the WB EHS requirement for daytime noise in industrial area is more stringent.

Table 2: Ambient Noise level standards of WB EHS Vs. the GOI NAAQS Receptor WB EHS GOI NAAQS Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime 7:00-22:00 22:00-7:00 6:00-22.00 22:00-6:00 Residential 55 45 55 45 Institutional; educational None None Industrial 70 70 75 70 Commercial 65 55 Silence Zone None None 50 40

Appendix 5 141

Appendix 5: Indian Standard Drinking Water Specification: II 10500:1991

Sl. Permissible Substance/ Characteristic Desirable Limit Remarks No. limit 1 Colour, Hazen units, Max 5 25 Extended to 25 if toxic substance are not suspected in absence of alternate sources 2 Odour Unobjectionable a) Test cold and when heated b) Test at several dilution 3 Taste Agreeable Test to be conducted only after safety has been established 4 Turbidity NTU, Max 5 10 5 pH value 6.5 to 8.5 No relaxation

6 Total Hardness (as CaCO3 600 600 mg/lit) 7 Iron (as Fe mg/lit, Max 0.3 1.0 8 Chlorides (as Cl mg/lit Max 250 1000 9 Residual Free Chlorine, 0.2 To be applicable only when mg/lit Max water is chlorinated. Treated at consumer end. When protection against viral infection is required, it should be Min 0.5 mg/lit 10 Dissolved Solids mg/l, Max 500 2000 11 Calcium (as Ca) mg/l, Max 75 200 12 Copper (as Cu) mg/l, Max 0.05 1.5 13 Manganese (Mn) mg/l Max 0.1 0.3

14 Sulphate (As SO4), Max 200 400 May be extended up to 400 provided (as Mg) does not exceed 30

15 Nitrate (as NO3) mg/l, Max 45 100 16 Fluoride (as F) mg/l, Max 1.0 1.5 17 Phenolic Compounds (as 0.001 0.002 C6H6OH) mg/l Max 18 Arsenic (as As mg/l 0.05 No relaxation To be tested when pollution is suspected 19 Lead (as Pb) mg/l 0.05 No relaxation 20 Anionic Detergents (as 0.2 1.0 MBAS) mg/l 21 Chromium (as Cr) mg/l 0.05 1.0 To be tested when pollution is suspected 22 Mineral Oil mg/l 0.01 0.03 23 Alkalinity mg/l 200 600 24 Total Coliform 95% of the sample should not contain coliform in 100 ml. 10 coliform /100 ml

142 Appendix 6

Appendix 6: Record of Public Consultations

Kharamseda-Kirhai-Ramgarh Road

Jharkua-Raigaon-Karsara Road

Bhatura-Bhadanpur-Barrakhurd Road Appendix 6 143

Ramgarh-Mada Road

Harphari-Khaira-Misirgawan Via Shivpurva Road

Chitrangi-Garhwa Road

144 Appendix 6

Parsona-Mada Road Appendix 6 145

Gohparu-Rasmohini-Burhar Road

146 Appendix 6

Anuppur-Jaitpur Road

Pasgarhi-Devri-Janakpur Road

Sohagpur-Manpur Road

Appendix 6 147

Jhurai to Sarai Road

148 Appendix 6

Attendance Sheet KharamsedaKirhaiRamgarh road

Appendix 6 149

150 Appendix 6

Appendix 6 151

JharkuaRaigaonKarsarroad

152 Appendix 6

Appendix 6 153

154 Appendix 6

BhaturaBhadanpurBarrakhurdroad

Appendix 6 155

156 Appendix 6

ParsonaMadaroad

Appendix 6 157

158 Appendix 6

Appendix 6 159

160 Appendix 6

Appendix 6 161

RamgarhMada road

162 Appendix 6

HarfariKhaira road

Appendix 6 163

164 Appendix 6

Chitrangi-Garhwa road Appendix 6 165

AnuppurJaitpur road

166 Appendix 6

Appendix 6 167

168 Appendix 6

Appendix 6 169

170 Appendix 6

Appendix 6 171

172 Appendix 6

GohparuRasmohiniBurharroad

Appendix 6 173

174 Appendix 6

Appendix 6 175

176 Appendix 6

Appendix 6 177

178 Appendix 6

Pasgarhi Devri Janakpur

Appendix 6 179

180 Appendix 6

Jhurai to sarai Road

Appendix 6 181

182 Appendix 6

Appendix 6 183

SohagpurManpur Road

184 Appendix 6

Appendix 7 185

Appendix 7: GRM Information Sheet

186 Appendix 7

Appendix 7 187

188 Appendix 7

Appendix 7 189

190 Appendix 8

Appendix 8: Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan

A. Environmental Management Plan (Contract Package No. 16)

This EMP is applicable to three subproject road included in Civil Works Contract Package No 16 i.e. 1) Kirhai-Ramgarh-Mukundpur Road, 2) Jharkua- Raigaon-Karsara Road and 3) Bhadanpur-Bhatura Road EnvironmentalIssue / Referenceto Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility RemedialMeasure Location component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision A. Pre-construction andDesignStage 1. Alignment 1.1 Pavement  Provision of adequate side drains to Design  Side drains have been  Design of both Review of Included in Design MPRDC / damage and inadequate evacuate the rain water and domestic requirement proposed in Gora, Kontar, cross & side detail design construction Consultant CSC drainage provision in discharges (drained by habitats Lalgaon, Mukundpur drains, documents & cost drawings habitat areas occasionally) to prevent damage to road villages in KRM road (4.6  No. of CD and rain water entry to habitats’ houses. Km both side), in Raigaon, structures &  Provision of adequate no. of cross Etama, Semariya&Karsara their spans drainage structures based on drainage villages in JRK (3.215 km pattern around the alignment. both side), in Bandhi&Gharewai villages (0.650 Km both side)  Existing CD structures are sufficient. No new CD structures proposed except in BB road where 2 new HPC proposed at Km 3.950 & Km 15.050. 1.2 Loss of 941 trees  Restricting tree cutting within Design  Throughout the alignment  No. of trees to Observation, Included in Design MPRDC / and vegetation cover @ construction limit. requirement, be cut construction Consultant CSC 242 at Kirhai-Ramgarh-  Avoiding tree cutting at ancillary sites. cost Mukundpur Road , 455  Providing and maintaining compensatory at Jharkua-Raigaon- tree plantation of 9410 trees @ 1:10 Karsara Road and 244 at ratio. Bhadanpur-Bhatura Road 1.3 Protection of  Careful selection of alignment to avoid Project  Design and Review of Included in Contractor MPRDC / sensitive receptors damages to the sensitive receptors requirement Location of temples, schools alignment plan design construction CSC  Timely scheduling of construction and other sensitive receptors activities along the project roads  Provision of noise suitable barriers (Refer to Table. 25). Appendix 8 191

EnvironmentalIssue / Referenceto Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility RemedialMeasure Location component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision A. Pre-construction andDesignStage 1. Alignment 1.4 Safety along the  Provision of retro-reflective warning Design  232 numbers of different  No. of accident Field Included in Design MPRDC / proposed alignment sign boards nears school, hospital, requirement, types of sign boards & Vehicle observation, construction Consultant CSC religious places, and other areas, speed IRC-67 for proposed in KRM road, 123 collisions interview of cost restriction sign in built-ups, forests areas road signs, numbers in JRK road & 84 locals etc. IRC-73 for numbers in BB road. geometric  Improving substandard curves, grading &  Substandard curves have design other geometric features as per IRC been improved at Km standards, Standards IRC-119 for 1+150, 5+250, 16+925,  Provision of metal beam crash traffic safety, 24+250 & 24+525 in KRM barriers/guard stones at high IRC-75 for road and at Km 8+550 & embankment locations. slope 15+075 in BB road  Provision of slope stabilization measures stabilisation in  Length of W-beam crash in high embankment/cutting to prevent high barriers (where height of any land slide situation. embankment embankment is more than 3.0 m) provided in KRM road is 3200 m (bothside), 600 m (bothside) in JRK and 1200 m (bothside) in BB road 2. Natural Hazards 2.1 Protection for  Design considering relevant IRC IRC-6 for  Throughout the stretch  Incorporation Review of Project Design MPRDC damage from guidelines for earthquakes in bridges. structure of IRC bridge preparation Consultant /CSC Earthquake design, guidelines for design Cost IS-1893 for earthquake in earthquake bridge design resistant design 2.2 Protection of  Raise embankment height above the IRC-34 for road  Sub-grade top has been  Design of Included in Design MPRDC road embankment in HFL levels in the flood prone areas. construction in kept 0.6m above HFL embankment/ construction Consultant /CSC Flood prone Areas  Improvement in existing culverts/ Bridges water logged throughout the stretch and road profile, cost areas and to increase their carrying capacity. profile has been raised at  Design of both

water logged areas. cross & side  Provision of adequate balancing culverts. IRC-75 for  86 structures (25 HPC, 5 drains, design of high slab culverts, 16 VCW & 40 embankment  No. of CD FCW) are proposed to be structures & reconstructed in KRM road, their spans 24 structures (1 minor bridge, 18 HPC, 3 slab culverts, 1 VCW & 1 Arch) in JRK road, 25 structures (2 minor bridge, 18 HPC, 3 slab culverts & 2 VCW) in BB road  Existing CD structures are sufficient. No new CD structures proposed. 3. Shifting of utility structures

192 Appendix 8

EnvironmentalIssue / Referenceto Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility RemedialMeasure Location component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision A. Pre-construction andDesignStage 1. Alignment 3.1 Disruption of  All telephone and electrical poles/wires Project  The contractor will shift all  Utility shifting Interaction Included in Contractor/ MPRDC utility services to local and underground cables should be requirement utility structure throughout plan with Construction CSC /CSC community shifted before start of construction. the corridor with permission  Complaints concerned cost  Necessary permission and payments from relevant authorities from local utility should be made to relevant utility service before commencement of people authorities and local agencies to allow quick shifting and physical works.  Status of local public restoration of utility services. utility services  Local people must be informed through appropriate means about the time of shifting of utility structures and potential disruption of services if any. B. Construction Stage 1. Air Quality 1.1 Dust generation due  Transport, loading and unloading of MORT&H  Throughout the project  PM10 level Standards Included in Contractor MPRDC/ to construction activities loose and fine materials through covered Specifications corridor. measurement, CPCB project cost CSC & transport, storage and vehicles. for Road and  Dust pollution methods of Bridge works, handling of construction  Paved approach roads. or complain of observation materials Air (P & CP) s,  Storage areas to be located downwind of locals Act 1974 and Public the habitation area. Central Motor consultation  Water spraying on earthworks, unpaved and Vehicle haulage roads and other dust prone Act 1988 areas.  Provision of PPEs to workers. 1.2 Emission of air  Regular maintenance of machinery and The Air  Asphalt mixing plants,  Monitoring of Standards Included in Contractor MPRDC pollutants (HC, SO2, equipment. (P & CP) crushers, DG sets locations ambient air CPCB project cost /CSC NOX, CO etc) from  Batching, asphalt mixing plants and Act,1981 quality & methods (Amended198 vehicles due to traffic crushers at downwind (1km) direction checking PUC 7) and congestion & use of from the nearest settlement. certificates equipment and Rules1982  Only crushers licensed by the PCB machinery shall be used.

 DG sets with stacks of adequate height and use of low sulphur diesel as fuel.  Ambient air quality monitoring.

Appendix 8 193

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 2. Noise 2.1 Noise from  All equipment to be timely serviced and Legal  Throughout project section  Noise levels As per Included in Contractor MPRDC/ Construction vehicle, properly maintained. requirement especially at construction measurements Noise rule, project cost CSC equipment and  Construction equipment and machinery to sites, residential and  Complaints 2000 Plantation Noise cost is machinery. be fitted with silencers and maintained identified sensitive locations. from local Consultation Pollution separate properly.  Noise barriers has been people with local (Regulation proposed in total 1640m people  Only IS approved equipment shall be used and Control) length (700m in KRM, 740m for construction activities. Rules, 2000  Timing of noisy construction activities shall and in JRK and 200m in BB be done during night time and weekends near amendments road) schools and selected suitable times near Thereof + temples when there are no visitors, Clause No concurrent noisy operations may be 501.8.6. separated to reduce the total noise generated, MORT&H and if possible re-route traffic during Specification construction to avoid the accumulation of s for noise beyond standards. Else provision of Road and temporary noise barrier at sensitive locations Bridge or near sources. works  Time regulation near residential, built up and forest areas construction shall be restricted to daylight hours.  Initiation of multi layered plantation, to serve as mitigation option for operation phase.  Provision of Noise barriers at sensitive locations  Noise monitoring as per EMoP. 3. Land and Soil 3.1 Land use  Non-agricultural areas to be used as borrow Project  Throughout the project  Borrow pit Review Included in Contractor MPRDC/ Change and Loss of areas to the extent possible. requirement section and Locations Top borrow area construction CSC productive/top soil  If using agricultural land, top soil to be  Borrow areas (Km 2.5, Km soil storage plan, site cost preserved and laid over either on the 7.5 & Km 11 of KRM road , area visits embankment slope for growing vegetation to Km 13, Km 17.5, Km 19, Km protect soil erosion. 22.5 & Km 23.9 of JRK road and Km 0.3, Km 7.55, Km 9.75 & Km 15 of BB road)

194 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 3. Land and Soil 3.2 Slope failure  Bio-turfing of embankments to protect slopes. IRC-56 for  Throughout the entire  Occurrence of Review of Included in Design MPRDC/ and soil erosion due  Slope protection by providing dry stone treatment of project road especially slope failure or design Construction consultant and CSC to construction pitching, masonry retaining walls, planting of embankment along hilly areas erosion issues documents cost Contractor, slopes for activities, earthwork, grass and trees. and site and cut and fill, erosion control, observation  The side slopes of all cut and fill areas will be stockpiles etc. Clause No. graded and covered with stone pitching, 306 and grass and shrub as per design specifications. 305.2.2  Care should be taken that the slope gradient MORT&H shall not be greater than 2:1. Specifications for Road and Bridge works, Guidelines IX for Soil erosion 3.3 Borrow site  Non-productive, barren lands, upland shall be IRC-10 for  Borrow sites location (Km  Existence of Review of Included in Design MPRDC/ locations used for borrowing earth with the necessary guidelines on 2.5, Km 7.5 & Km 11 of borrow areas design Construction consultant and CSC permissions/consents. borrow areas KRM road, Km 13, Km in document s cost Contractor,  Depths of borrow pits to be regulated and and for 17.5, Km 19, Km 22.5 & inappropriate and site sides not steeper than 25%. quarries, Km 23.9 of JRK road and unauthorized observation Environmental  Topsoil to be stockpiled and protected for use Km 0.3, Km 7.55, Km locations. Protection Act at the rehabilitation stage. 9.75 & Km 15 of BB road).  Poor borrow and These are located away  Transportation of earth materials through area Rules, 1986; from habitation areas & covered vehicles. management Water Act, Air mainly are non-productive practices.  To the extent borrow areas shall be sited Act, Clause No. barren lands.  Incidents of away from habitation areas. Borrow areas 305.2.2 accidents. shall be levelled with salvaged material or MORT&H other filling materials which do not pose Specifications  Complaints contamination of soil. for Road and from local Bridge works people. Guidelines V for Borrow Areas management 3.4 Quarry operations  Aggregates will be sourced from existing Clause 111.3  Quarry area locations  Existence of Review of Included in Contractor MPRDC/ licensed quarries. MORT&H licenses for all design Construction CSC  Copies of consent/ approval / rehabilitation Specifications quarry areas document s, cost plan for a new quarry or use of existing source for Road and from which contractor will be submitted to EO, MPRDC. Bridge works, materials are document s Guidelines VI and site  The contractor will develop a Quarry being sourced for quarry area observation Redevelopment plan, as per the Mining Rules  Complaints management of the state and submit a copy of the from local approval to EA. people.

Appendix 8 195

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 3. Land and Soil 3.5 Compaction of  Construction vehicles, machinery and Design  Parking areas,  Location of Site Included in Contractor MPRDC/ soil and impact on equipment to be stationed in the designated requirement  Haulage roads and approach and observation construction CSC quarry haul roads ROW to avoid compaction. construction yards. haulage roads cost due to movement of  Approach roads/haulage roads shall be  Presence of vehicles and designed along the barren and hard soil area destroyed equipment to reduce the compaction. /compacted  Transportation of quarry material to the agricultural dumping site through heavy vehicles shall be land or land done through existing major roads to the which has not extent possible to restrict wear and tear to the be restored to village/minor roads. its original  Land taken for construction camp and other condition temporary facility shall be restored to its original conditions. 3.6 Contamination  Construction vehicles and equipment will Design  Fuelling station,  Quality of soil Site Included in Contractor MPRDC/ of soil due to leakage be maintained and refuelled in such a fashion requirement construction sites, near storage observation Construction CSC /spillage of oil, that oil/diesel spillage does not contaminate and construction camps area cost. bituminous and non- the soil. and disposal location.  Presence of bituminous debris  Fuel storage and refuelling sites to be kept spilled oil or generated from away from drainage channels. bitumen in demolition and road  Unusable debris shall be dumped in ditches project area construction and low lying areas.  To avoid soil contamination Oil-Interceptors shall be provided at wash down and refuelling areas.  Waste oil and oil soaked cotton/ cloth shall be stored in containers labelled ‘Waste Oil’ and ‘Hazardous’ sold off to MoEF/SPCB authorized vendors.  Non-bituminous wastes to be dumped in borrow pits with the concurrence of landowner and covered with a layer of topsoil conserved from opening the pit.  Bituminous wastes will be disposed off in an identified dumping site approved by the State Pollution Control Board. 4. WaterResources 4.1 Sourcing of water  Requisite permission shall be obtained for -  Throughout the project  Approval from checking of Included in Contractor MPRDC during construction abstraction of groundwater from Central section competent documentati construction /CSC Groundwater Authority. authority, on on Talk to cost  Arrangements shall be made by contractor  complaints local people that the water availability and supply to from local nearby communities remain unaffected. people on water availability

196 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 4. WaterResources 4.2 Disposal of  Provisions shall be made to connect road Clause  Throughout the Project  Design of road Standards Included in Contractor MPRDC water during side drains with exiting nearby ponds No.1010 section side drains methods Site construction /CSC construction otherwise make provision of water harvesting EP Act 1986  Existence of observation cost pits intermittently. MORT&H proper and review Specifications drainage of for Road and system for documents Bridge disposal of works waste water 4.3 Alteration in  Existing drainage system to be maintained Design  Near all drainage  Design of road Review of Included in Contractor MPRDC surface water and further enhanced. requirement, channels, river crossings side drains Design construction /CSC hydrology due to  Provision shall be made for adequate size and Clause No etc. documents cost embankment number of cross drainage structures esp. in 501.8.6. Site the areas where land is sloping towards road MORT&H observation alignment. Specifications for  Road level shall be raised above HFL level Road and wherever road level is lesser than HFL. Bridge 4.4 Siltation in  Embankment slopes to be modified suitably to Design  Near all water bodies,  Siltation of Field Included in Contractor MPRDC water bodies due to restrict the soil debris entering water bodies. requirement, river embankment slopes. rivers, streams, observation construction /CSC construction  Provision of Silt fencing shall be made at Clause No ponds and cost activities/ earthwork water bodies. 501.8.6. other water MORT&H  Silt/sediment should be collected and bodies in Specifications stockpiled for possible reuse as surfacing of project area for Road and slopes where they have to be re-vegetated. Bridge works 4.5 Deterioration in  No vehicles or equipment should be parked or The Water  Water bodies, Refuelling  Water quality Conduction Included in Contractor MPRDC Surface water quality refuelled near water-bodies, so as to avoid (Prevention and stations, construction of ponds, of water construction /CSC due to leakage from contamination from fuel and lubricants. Control of camps. streams, rivers quality tests cost vehicles and  Oil and grease traps and fuelling platforms to Pollution) Act, and other as per the equipment’s and be provided at re-fuelling locations. 1974 and water bodies in monitoring waste from amendments plan Field  All chemicals and oil shall be stored away project area, construction camps. thereof. observation from water and concreted platform with catch  Presence of oil pit for spills collection. floating in  All equipment operators, drivers, and water bodies in warehouse personnel will be trained in project area immediate response for spill containment and eventual clean-up.  Construction camp to be sited away from water bodies.  Wastes must be collected, stored and taken to approve disposal site only.  Water quality shall be monitored periodically

Appendix 8 197

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 5. Flora and Fauna 5.1 Vegetation  Minimize tree cutting to the extent possible. Forest  Throughout the project  ROW width, Review of Road side Relevant MPRDC loss due to site  Roadside trees to be removed with prior Conservation corridor  Number of Relevant plantation agency /CSC preparation and approval of competent authority. Act 1980, trees for felling documents– cost is specialized in construction activities IRC SP: 21 and tree cutting included in afforestation  Compensatory plantation at 1:10 basis and  Compensatory and IRC SP:66 permit, project costs. additional plantation as per the IRC guidelines plantation plan compensato in consultation with Forest Department.  Number of ry plantation  Regular maintenance of all trees planted. trees replanted plan ,  Provision of LPG in construction camp as fuel Field source to avoid tree cutting, wherever observation possible. s  Plantation of trees on both sides of the road. Integrate vegetation management (IVM).  In the event of design changes during the construction stages additional assessments including the possibility to save trees shall be made by the EA.  Road side Plantation Strategy as per IRC specifications including maturing. 6. ConstructionCamps 6.1 Impact All camps should maintain minimum Design  All construction camps  Location of On site Included in Contractor and MPRDC associated with distance from following: Requirement camp sites and Observation construction EO /CSC location 1) 500 m from habitation, distance from , Interaction cost 2) 500 m from forest areas where habitation/fores with workers possible, t /water bodies and local 3) 500 m from water bodies where community possible, 4) 500 m from through traffic route where possible. 6.2 Worker’s Health  The location, layout and basic facility The building  All construction camps  Camp health Camp Part of the Contractor MPRDC in construction camp provision of each labour camp will be and other records, records, Contractors /CSC submitted to CSC prior to their construction. construction  Existence of Site costs The construction shall commence only after workers proper first aid observation, approval of CSC. (Regulation of kit in camp site Consultation Employment with local  The contractor will maintain necessary living  Complaints and Conditions people living accommodation and ancillary facilities in from local of Service) Act nearby functional and hygienic manner as approved people by the EA. 1996 and The Water  Adequate water and sanitary latrines with (Prevention septic tanks attached to soak pits shall be and Control of provided. Pollution) Act,  Preventive medical care to be provided to 1974 and workers including a First-Aid kit that must be amendments available in the camp. thereof  Waste disposal facilities such as dust bins must be provided in the camps and regular disposal of waste must be carried out.

198 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision  The Contractor will take all precautions to protect the workers from insect and pest to reduce the risk to health. This includes the use of insecticides which should comply with local regulations.  No alcoholic liquor or prohibited drugs will be imported to, sell, give, and barter to the workers of host community.  Awareness raising to immigrant Workers /local community on communicable and sexually transmitted diseases. 7. Management of Construction Waste/Debris 7.1 Selection of  Unproductive/waste lands shall be selected Design  At all dumping sites  Location of Field survey Included in Contractor MPRDC Dumping Sites for dumping sites away from residential areas Requirement dumping sites, & interaction Construction /CSC and water bodies. and MORT&H  Public with local cost.  Dumping sites have adequate capacity equal guidelines complaints people to the amount of debris generated.  Public perception and consent from the village Panchayats has to be obtained before finalizing the location.

7.2 Reuse and  The existing bitumen surface shall be utilized MORT&H  Throughout the project  Percentage of Contractor Included in Contractor MPRDC disposal of for paving of cross roads, access roads, and guidelines corridor reuse of Records, Construction /CSC construction and paving works in construction sites and camps, existing Field cost. dismantled waste temporary traffic diversions, and haulage surface observation, routes. material Interaction  All excavated materials from roadway,  Method and with local shoulders, verges, drains, cross drainage will location of people be used for backfilling embankments, filling disposal site of pits, and landscaping. construction  Unusable and non-bituminous debris debris materials should be suitably disposed off at pre-designated disposal locations, with approval of the concerned authority. The bituminous wastes shall be disposed in secure landfill sites only in environmentally accepted manner. For removal of debris, wastes and its disposal MoRT&H guidelines should be followed.  Unusable and surplus materials, as determined by the Project Engineer, will be removed and disposed off-site.

Appendix 8 199

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 8. TrafficManagementandSafety 8.1 Management of  Temporary traffic diversion shall be planned by Design  Throughout the  Traffic Review Included in Contractor MPRDC existing traffic and the contractor and approved by the Engineer’. requirement and project corridor management traffic construction /CSC safety  The traffic control plans shall contain details of IRC SP:55 especially at plan Safety management cost. diversions; traffic safety arrangements during intersections. signs on site, plan Field construction; safety measures for night time  Number of observation of traffic and precautions for transportation of traffic traffic hazardous materials. Traffic control plans shall be accidents management prepared in line with requirements of IRC- SP-55. and safety system  The Contractor will ensure that the diversion is Interaction always maintained in running condition, with people in particularly during the monsoon to avoid vehicles using disruption to traffic flow. the road  On stretches where it is not possible to pass the traffic on the part width of existing carriageway, temporary paved diversions will be constructed.  Restriction of construction activity to only one side of the existing road.  The contractor shall inform local community of changes to traffic routes, and pedestrian access arrangements with assistance from “Engineer”.  Use of adequate signage’s to ensure traffic management and safety.  Conduct of regular safety audit on safety measures. 8.2 Pedestrians,  Temporary access and diversion, with proper Design  Near habitation on  Road signage Field Included in Contractor MPRDC animal movement drainage facilities. requirement, both sides of & drainage as Observation, construction /CSC  Access to the schools, temples and other public IRC-SP-27 for schools, temples, per IRC Interaction cost. places must be maintained when construction recommendation hospitals, guideline, with local takes place near them. s of IRC regional graveyards,  Complaints people workshops  Fencing wherever cattle movement is expected. construction sites, from local on Highway haulage roads,  To avoid the need for cattle underpasses, some of people Safety, IRC-SP- diversion sites. the proposed culverts near habitations may be 32 for road widened to facilitate cattle movement. Safety for Children, IRC- SP-44 for highway Safety, IRC-SP-55 for safety in road construction zone

200 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 8.3 Safety of  Contractors to adopt and maintain safe working  Construction  Availability of Site Included in Obligation of MPRDC Workers and practices. sites safety gears to Observation, construction Contractor /CSC accident risk from  Usage of fluorescent and retro-reflectory signage, in workers, Review cost construction local language at the construction sites  Safety signage, records on activities safety training  Training to workers on safety procedures and  Training records and accidents, precautions. on safety, Interact with  Mandatory appointment of safety officer.  Number of construction  All regulations regarding safe scaffolding, ladders, safety related workers working platforms, gangway, stairwells, excavations, accidents trenches and safe means of entry and egress shall be complied With.  Provision of PPEs to workers.  Provision of a readily available first aid unit including an adequate supply of dressing materials.  The contractor will not employ any person below the age of 18 years for any work.  Use of hazardous material should be minimized and/or restricted.  Emergency plan (to be approved by engineer) shall be prepared to respond to any accidents or emergencies.  Accident Prevention Officer must be appointed by the contractor. 8.4 Accident risk to  Restrict access to construction sites to authorized  Construction  Safety signs and Site Included in Contractor MPRDC local community personnel. sites their location, inspection, construction /CSC  Physical separation must be provided for movement of  Incidents of Consultation cost vehicular and human traffic. accidents, with local people  Adequate signage must be provided for safe traffic  Complaints from movement. local people 9. Site restoration and rehabilitation 9.1 Clean-up  Contractor will prepare site restoration plans, which will Project  Throughout the  Clean and Site Included in Contractor MPRDC Operations, be approved by the ‘Engineer’. requirement project restored camp observation, construction /CSC Restoration and  The clean-up and restoration operations are to be corridor, sites presence Interaction cost . Rehabilitation implemented by the contractor prior to demobilization. construction /absence of with locals, Issue  All construction zones including river-beds, culverts, camp sites and construction completion road-side areas, camps, hot mix plant sites, crushers, borrow areas material/ debris certificate batching plant sites and any other area used/affected by after completion after the project will be left clean and tidy, at the contractor's of construction restoration of expense, to the satisfaction of the Environmental officer. works on construction site all sites are  All the opened borrow areas will be rehabilitated and found ‘Engineer’ will certify in this regard. satisfactory

Appendix 8 201

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision C. Operation stage 1. Air quality 1.1 Air pollution  Roadside tree plantations shall be maintained. Environmental  Throughout the  Ambient air As per Included in MPRDC / CSC due to due to  Regular maintenance of the road will be done to Protection Act, corridor quality (PM10, CPCB Operation/ vehicular movement ensure good surface condition 1986; The Air CO, NOx) requirement Maintenance (Prevention and s, site cost  Vehicular air pollution will be managed and  Survival rate of Control of inspection monitored. trees planted Pollution) Act, 1981  Ambient air quality monitoring. If monitored parameters are above the prescribed limit, suitable control measures must be taken.  Technological and behavioural changes.  Road signs shall be provided reminding the motorist to properly maintain their vehicles to economize on fuel consumption and protect the environment. 2. Noise

2.1 Noise due to  Effective traffic management and good riding Noise Pollution  Sensitive  Noise levels Noise Included in MPRDC / CSC movement of traffic conditions shall be maintained to reduce the noise (Regulation and receptors monitoring Operation/ level throughout the stretch and speed limitation & Control) Rules,  Noise barriers as per noise Maintenance honking restrictions may be enforced near 2000 and have been rules, 2000, cost sensitive locations. amendments proposed in total Discussion  The effectiveness of the multi-layered plantation thereof 1640m length with people should be monitored and if need be, solid noise (700m in KRM, in sensitive barrier shall be placed. 740m in JRK and receptor sites  Create awareness amongst the residents about 200m in BB road) likely noise levels from road operation at different distances, the safe ambient noise limits and easy to implement noise reduction measures while constructing a building close to the road. 3. Land and Soil 3.1 Soil erosion at  Periodic checking to be carried to assess the Project requirement  At bridge  Existence of soil On site Included in MPRDC / CSC Embankment during effectiveness of the stabilization measures viz. locations & erosion sites observation Operation/ heavy rain fall. turning, stone pitching, river training structures etc. embankment  Number of soil Maintenance  Necessary measures to be followed wherever slopes and other erosion sites cost there are failures. probable soil erosion areas.

202 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementati Supervision C. Operation stage on 4. Water resources/Flooding and Inundation 4.1 Siltation  Regular checks shall be made for soil erosion and Project  Near surface  Water quality Site Included in MPRDC / CSC turning conditions of river training structures for its requirement water bodies observation Operation/ effective maintenance. Maintenance cost 4.2 Water logging  Regular visual checks and cleaning of drains shall be Project  Near surface  Presence of Site Included in MPRDC / CSC due to blockage done along the alignment to ensure that flow of water is requirement water bodies flooded areas observation Operation/ of drains, culverts or maintained through cross drains and other channels or areas with Maintenance streams /streams. water stagnation e cost  Monitoring of water borne diseases due to stagnant water bodies. 4.3 Road inundation  MPRDC will ensure that all drains (side drains and Project  Near surface  Incidents of Field Included in MPRDC / CSC due to choking of all cross drainages) are periodically cleared especially requirement water bodies flooding & road observation, Operation/ drainage channels before monsoon season to facilitate the quick inundation with Interaction Maintenance passage of rainwater and avoid flooding. details with local cost community 5. Flora 5.1 Vegetation  Planted trees, shrubs, and grasses to be properly Forest  Project tree  Minimum of Records and Operation MPRDC / CSC maintained. Conservation plantation sites 70% of tree fields and  The tree survivalist audit to be conducted at least once Act 1980 survival observations Maintenance in a year to assess the effectiveness. Cost 6. Maintenance of Right of Way and Safety 6.1 Accident Risk  Efforts shall be made to make shoulder completely clear Project  Throughout the  Presence of and Visual Included in MPRDC / CSC due to uncontrolled of vegetation. requirement project route extent of Inspection, operation/ growth of vegetation  Regular maintenance of plantation along the roadside. vegetation Accident Maintenance records cost  Invasive plant not to be planted near the road. growth on either side of road Accident data 6.2 Accident risks  Traffic control measures, including speed limits, will be IRC:SP:55  Throughout the  Police records Review Included in MPRDC / CSC associated with traffic enforced strictly. project route on accident accident operation/ movement.  Further encroachment of squatters within the ROW will condition and records, Maintenance be prevented. existence of Site cost observation  No school or hospital will be allowed to be established safety signs, s beyond the stipulated planning line as per relevant local rumble strips law etc. on the road  Monitor/ensure that all safety provisions included in  Presence/ design and construction phase are properly maintained absence of sensitive  Highway patrol unit(s) for round the clock patrolling. receptor Phone booths for accidental reporting and ambulance structures inside services with minimum response time for rescue of any the stipulated accident victims, if possible. planning line as per relevant local law

Appendix 8 203

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision C. Operation stage 6.3 Transport of  Existence of spill prevention and control and  Throughout the project  Status of Review of Included in MPRDC / CSC dangerous goods emergency responsive system. stretch emergency spill Operation/  Emergency plan for vehicles carrying system–whether prevention Maintenance hazardous material. operational or and cost. not emergency response system Spill

Note EA: Executing Agency, MPRDC: Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation, EO: Environmental Officer, IRC: Indian Road Congress

a. The“Projectengineer”or “theengineer”istheteamof ConstructionSupervisionConsultants(CSC)responsiblefor approvingtheplans, engineeringdrawing,releaseofpaymentstocontractoretc.onbehalfoftheemployer(MPRDC).ItisusuallytheteamleaderoftheCSCthat takestheresponsibilityofsigningapprovaldocumentson behalfof theCSCteam. b. The “environmental officer” is the environmental specialist under the CSC who is responsible for providing recommendations to the CSC team leader for approving activities specific to environment safeguards on behalf of “the engineer”.

204 Appendix 8

Environmental Monitoring Plan (Contract Package No. 16) Environmental Monitoring Institutional Responsibility Location Frequency Components Parameters Special Guidance Standards Implementation Supervision

Air PM2.5,PM10, AsperCPCB guidelines TheAir Atsiteswhere 3 times in a year for 3 years Contractorthrough PIU,MPRDC, SO2,NOX,CO (Prevention&Controlof hotmixplant/batchingplan or construction period at 3 approved CSC Pollution)Rules, t is located sites & once in year for five monitoringagency CPCB,1982 years at 3 sites during operation/ defect liability period Water pH, BOD, COD, Grab sample collected Water quality standards river tributaries, roadside Once during preconstruction Contractor through PIU,MPRDC, TDS, TSS, DO, from source and by CPCB ponds and ground water stage 3 times in a year for 3 approved CSC Total coliform, analyze as per at construction camp years or construction period monitoring agency Conductivity, Oil standard methods for sites at 3 locations & Grease examination of water and wastewater NoiseLevels Noise level for In free field at 1m Noise standard by At equipment yards, 3 times in a year for 3 years Contractor through PIU,MPRDC, day and night on distance from the CPCB camp and villages along or construction period, 3 approved CSC dB(A) scale equipment to be the alignment. locations & once in a year monitoring agency monitored for 5 years at 3 sites during operation/defect liability period. Soilquality Monitoring of NPK As per IRC code of Ad hock if accident/ spill - PIU through an PIU,MPRDC & heavy metals practice locations involving bulk approved agency and grease transport of carrying hazardous materials Road side Monitoring of It should be ensured As given in the IEE All along the corridor During the felling of trees Forest department PIU,MPRDC Plantation felling of trees that the marked trees report are felled only

Survival rate of The number of trees The survival rate should At locations of Every year for 3 years PIU PIU,MPRDC trees, success of surviving during each be at least 75% below compensatory re- vegetation visit should be which re-plantation afforestation compared with the should be done number of saplings planted

Note Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation, PIU- Project Implementation Unit, CSC- Construction Supervision Consultant Appendix 8 205

SL. NO ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT RATE (Rs.) AMOUNT (Rs.) RESPONSIBILITY

A Forest Clearance and Compensatory Afforestation

Compensatory afforestation and avenue PIU through Forest A.1 plantation @1:10 trees including 3 year 9410 No. 1000 9410000 Department maintainance

B Environmental Monitoring

Ambient air quality monitoring during construction and operations phases (3 times in a B.1 year for 3 years or construction period 3 sites & 126 No. 9000 1134000 Five years during operation/defect liability period, once in a year at three sites)

Ambient noise level monitoring during construction and operations phases (3 times in a B.2 year for 3 years or construction period 3 sites & 126 No. 3000 378000 Five years during operation/defect liability period, once in a year at three sites)

PIU through Approved Water quality monitoring of surface water during monitoring Agency construction and operations phases (3 times in a B.3 81 No. 5000 405000 year for 3 years or construction period at 3 location sites)

Water quality monitoring of drinking water during construction and operations phases (3 times in a B.4 81 No. 5000 405000 year for 3 years or construction period at 3 location sites)

Soil quality monitoring during construction and B.5 operations phases (3 times in a year for 3 years 81 No. 10000 810000 or construction period at 3 location sites)

C Noise Barrier at Sensitive Location

Provide the Noise barrier at sensitive areas like schools and temples.The noise barriers of hollow Contractor through C.1 brick wall/reinforced concrete panels with height 1640 Rm 2000 3280000 BOQ of 3.5m. The design of the noise barrier shall be approved by the engineer in charge.

D Solid Waste Management

Solid Waste Management during entire project D.1 108 No. 3000/; month 324000 period

E Dust Suppression

Dust Suppression along the entire project length 2000/- per day E.1 2160 No. 4320000 three tankers in a days for 240 Days per tanker F Environmental Training

PIU through Training at site : Three training sessions during 50000 per F.1 9 per sessions 450000 Supervision construction period session Consultant

TOTAL COST = 20916000

206 Appendix 8

Appendix 8b:Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan (Contract Package No. 17)

Environmental Management Plan (Contract Package No. 17)

This EMP is applicable to two subproject road included in Civil Works Contract Package No 17 i.e. 1) Harphari-Khaira-Misirgawan via Shivpurva Road and 2) Chitrangi-Garhwa Road Institutional Responsibility EnvironmentalIssue / Referenceto Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation RemedialMeasure Location Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision

A. Pre-construction andDesignStage 1. Alignment 1.1 Pavement  Provision of adequate side drains to evacuate Design  Side drains have been  Design of both Review of Included in Design MPRDC / damage and the rain water and domestic discharges requirement proposed in Korsar, cross & side detail design construction Consultant CSC inadequate drainage (drained by habitats occasionally) to prevent Mudrpali&Dharauli drains, documents & cost drawings provision in habitat damage to road and rain water entry to villages (1.500 Km both  No. of CD areas habitats’ houses. side) in HKM road & structures &  Provision of adequate no. of cross drainage NO Side drains have their spans structures based on drainage pattern around also been proposed in the alignment. CG road  Existing CD structures are sufficient. No new CD structures proposed. 1.2 Loss of 840  Restricting tree cutting within construction Design  Throughout the  No. of trees to Observation, Included in Design MPRDC trees and vegetation limit. requirement, alignment be cut construction Consultant CSC cover @ 586 at  Avoiding tree cutting at ancillary sites. cost Harphari-Khhaira  Providing and maintaining compensatory tree Road Road, 254 at plantation of 8400 trees @ 1:10 ratio. Chitrangi-Garhwa Road 1.3 Protection of  Careful selection of alignment to avoid Project  Design and Review of Included in Contractor MPRDC / sensitive receptors damages to the sensitive receptors requirement Location of temples, alignment plan design construction CSC  Timely scheduling of construction activities schools and other  Provision of noise suitable barriers sensitive receptors along the project roads (Refer to Table. 25). 1.4 Safety along the  Provision of retro-reflective warning sign Design  153 numbers of different  No. of accident Field Included in Design MPRDC / proposed alignment boards nears school, hospital, religious requirement, types of sign boards & Vehicle observation, construction Consultant CSC places, and other areas, speed restriction sign IRC-67 for road proposed in HKM road collisions interview of cost in built-ups, forests areas etc. signs, IRC-73 for as traffic safety locals geometric  Improving substandard curves, grading & measure. design other geometric features as per IRC  Substandard curves standards, IRC- Standards have been improved at 119 for traffic  Provision of metal beam crash barriers/guard safety, IRC-75 Km 1+050 to 1+250, stones at high embankment locations. for slope 1+600 to 1+750, 2+150  Provision of slope stabilization measures in stabilisation in to 2+450 high embankment/cutting to prevent any land high  Length of W-beam crash slide situation. embankment barriers (where height of embankment is more than 3.0 m) provided is 1300 m (bothside).

Appendix 8 207

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision A. Pre-construction and Design Stage 2. Natural Hazards 2.1 Protection for  Design considering relevant IRC guidelines for IRC-6 for  Throughout the  Incorporation Review of Project Design MPRDC / damage from earthquakes in bridges. structure stretch of IRC bridge preparation Consultant CSC Earthquake design, guidelines for design Cost IS-1893 for earthquake in earthquake bridge design resistant design 2.2 Protection of  Raise embankment height above the HFL levels in IRC-34 for road  Sub-grade top has  Design of Included in Design MPRDC / road embankment in the flood prone areas. construction in been kept 0.6m embankment/ construction Consultant CSC Flood prone Areas  Improvement in existing culverts/ Bridges to water logged above HFL road profile, cost areas and increase their carrying capacity. throughout the  Design of both

stretch and profile cross & side  Provision of adequate balancing culverts. IRC-75 for design has been raised at drains, of high water logged areas. embankment  No. of CD  17 structures (13 structures & HPC, 1 slab culvert their spans & 3 VCW) are proposed to be reconstructed in HKM  63 structures (57 HPC, 1 FCW & 5 VCW) are exist in CG road. 3. Shifting of utility structures  Existing CD 3.1 Disruption of  All telephone and electrical poles/wires and Project  Thestructures contractor willare  Utility shifting Interaction Included in Contractor/ MPRDC utility services to underground cables should be shifted before start requirement shiftsufficient. all No utility new plan with Construction CSC //CSC local community of construction. structureCD structures  Complaints concerned cost  Necessary permission and payments should be throughoutproposed. the from local utility made to relevant utility service agencies to allow corridor with people authorities and local quick shifting and restoration of utility services. permission from  Status of local public  Local people must be informed through appropriate relevant authorities utility services means about the time of shifting of utility structures before and potential disruption of services if any. commencement of physical works.

B. Construction Stage 1. Air Quality 1.1 Dust generation  Transport, loading and unloading of loose and fine MORT&H  Throughout the  PM10 level Standards Included in Contractor MPRDC due to construction materials through covered vehicles. Specifications project corridor. measurement, CPCB project cost /CSC activities & transport,  Paved approach roads. for Road and  Dust pollution methods of storage and handling Bridge works, observation  Storage areas to be located downwind of the or complain of of construction Air (P & CP) s, habitation area. locals materials Act 1974 and Public  Water spraying on earthworks, unpaved haulage Central Motor consultation roads and other dust prone areas. and Vehicle Act  Provision of PPEs to workers. 1988

208 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision 1.2 Emission of air  Regular maintenance of machinery and equipment. The Air  Asphalt mixing  Monitoring of Standards Included in Contractor MPRDC / pollutants (HC, SO2,  Batching, asphalt mixing plants and crushers at (P & CP) plants, crushers, DG ambient air CPCB project cost CSC NOX, CO etc) from downwind (1km) direction from the nearest Act,1981 sets locations quality & methods (Amended1987 vehicles due to settlement. checking PUC traffic congestion & ) and  Only crushers licensed by the PCB shall be certificates use of equipment Rules1982 used. and machinery  DG sets with stacks of adequate height and use of low sulphur diesel as fuel.  Ambient air quality monitoring. 2. Noise 2.1 Noise from  All equipment to be timely serviced and properly Legal  Throughout project  Noise levels As per Included in Contractor MPRDC Construction vehicle, maintained. requirement section especially at measurements Noise rule, project cost / CSC equipment and  Construction equipment and machinery to be construction sites,  Complaints 2000 Plantation Noise Pollution cost is machinery. fitted with silencers and maintained properly. residential and from local Consultation (Regulation and with local separate  Only IS approved equipment shall be used for identified sensitive people Control) Rules, locations. people construction activities. 2000 and Noise barriers has  Timing of noisy construction activities shall be amendments  done during night time and weekends near schools Thereof + been proposed in and selected suitable times near temples when Clause No total 412m length there are no visitors, concurrent noisy operations 501.8.6. (400m in HKM, 12m may be separated to reduce the total noise MORT&H in CG road) generated, and if possible re-route traffic during Specifications construction to avoid the accumulation of noise for beyond standards. Else provision of temporary Road and noise barrier at sensitive locations or near sources. Bridge  Time regulation near residential, built up and works forest areas construction shall be restricted to daylight hours.  Initiation of multi layered plantation, to serve as mitigation option for operation phase.  Provision of Noise barriers at sensitive locations  Noise monitoring as per EMoP. 3. Land and Soil 3.1 Land use  Non-agricultural areas to be used as borrow areas Project  Throughout the  Borrow pit Review Included in Contractor MPRDC Change and Loss of to the extent possible. requirement project section and Locations Top borrow area construction /CSC productive/top soil  If using agricultural land, top soil to be preserved  Borrow areas are soil storage plan, site cost and laid over either on the embankment slope for located Km 0.3 & Km area visits growing vegetation to protect soil erosion. 7.0 in HKM road & B. Construction Stage 3. Land and Soil

Appendix 8 209

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision 3.2 Slope failure  Bio-turfing of embankments to protect slopes. IRC-56 for  Throughout the  Occurrence of Review of Included in Design MPRDC and soil erosion due  Slope protection by providing dry stone pitching, treatment of entire project road slope failure or design Construction consultant / CSC to construction masonry retaining walls, planting of grass and embankment especially along hilly erosion issues documents cost and slopes for Contractor, activities, earthwork, trees. areas and site and cut and fill, erosion control, observation  The side slopes of all cut and fill areas will be stockpiles etc. Clause No. graded and covered with stone pitching, grass 306 and and shrub as per design specifications. 305.2.2  Care should be taken that the slope gradient shall MORT&H not be greater than 2:1. Specifications for Road and Bridge works, Guidelines IX for Soil erosion 3.3 Borrow site  Non-productive, barren lands, upland shall be used IRC-10 for  Borrow areas are  Existence of Review of Included in Design MPRDC locations for borrowing earth with the necessary guidelines on located Km 0.3 & Km borrow areas design Construction consultant /CSC permissions/consents. borrow areas 7.0. in document s cost and  Depths of borrow pits to be regulated and sides not and for  These are located inappropriate and site Contractor, steeper than 25%. quarries, away from habitation unauthorized observation Environmental  Topsoil to be stockpiled and protected for use at areas & mainly are locations. Protection Act the rehabilitation stage. non-productive  Poor borrow and barren lands. area  Transportation of earth materials through covered Rules, 1986; vehicles. management Water Act, Air practices.  To the extent borrow areas shall be sited away Act, Clause No.  Incidents of from habitation areas. Borrow areas shall be 305.2.2 accidents. levelled with salvaged material or other filling MORT&H materials which do not pose contamination of soil. Specifications  Complaints for Road and from local Bridge works people. Guidelines V for Borrow Areas management 3.4 Quarry operations  Aggregates will be sourced from existing licensed Clause 111.3  Quarry area  Existence of Review of Included in Contractor MPRDC quarries. MORT&H locations licenses for all design Construction /CSC  Copies of consent/ approval / rehabilitation plan for Specifications quarry areas document s, cost a new quarry or use of existing source will be for Road and from which contractor submitted to EO, MPRDC. Bridge works, materials are document s Guidelines VI and site  The contractor will develop a Quarry being sourced for quarry area observation Redevelopment plan, as per the Mining Rules of  Complaints management the state and submit a copy of the approval to from local EA. people.

210 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 3. Land and Soil 3.5 Compaction of  Construction vehicles, machinery and Design  Parking areas,  Location of Site Included in Contractor MPRDC soil and impact on equipment to be stationed in the designated requirement  Haulage roads and approach and observation construction /CSC quarry haul roads ROW to avoid compaction. construction yards. haulage roads cost due to movement of  Approach roads/haulage roads shall be  Presence of vehicles and designed along the barren and hard soil area destroyed equipment to reduce the compaction. /compacted  Transportation of quarry material to the agricultural dumping site through heavy vehicles shall be land or land done through existing major roads to the which has not extent possible to restrict wear and tear to the be restored to village/minor roads. its original  Land taken for construction camp and other condition temporary facility shall be restored to its original conditions. 3.6 Contamination  Construction vehicles and equipment will Design  Fuelling station,  Quality of soil Site Included in Contractor MPRDC of soil due to leakage be maintained and refuelled in such a fashion requirement construction sites, near storage observation Construction /CSC /spillage of oil, that oil/diesel spillage does not contaminate and construction camps area cost. bituminous and non- the soil. and disposal location.  Presence of bituminous debris  Fuel storage and refuelling sites to be kept spilled oil or generated from away from drainage channels. bitumen in demolition and road  Unusable debris shall be dumped in ditches project area construction and low lying areas.  To avoid soil contamination Oil-Interceptors shall be provided at wash down and refuelling areas.  Waste oil and oil soaked cotton/ cloth shall be stored in containers labelled ‘Waste Oil’ and ‘Hazardous’ sold off to MoEF/SPCB authorized vendors.  Non-bituminous wastes to be dumped in borrow pits with the concurrence of landowner and covered with a layer of topsoil conserved from opening the pit.  Bituminous wastes will be disposed off in an identified dumping site approved by the State Pollution Control Board. 4. WaterResources 4.1 Sourcing of water  Requisite permission shall be obtained for -  Throughout the project  Approval from checking of Included in Contractor MPRDC during construction abstraction of groundwater from Central section competent documentati construction /CSC Groundwater Authority. authority, on on Talk to cost  Arrangements shall be made by contractor  complaints local people that the water availability and supply to from local nearby communities remain unaffected. people on water availability

Appendix 8 211

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 4. WaterResources 4.2 Disposal of  Provisions shall be made to connect road Clause  Throughout the Project  Design of road Standards Included in Contractor MPRDC water during side drains with exiting nearby ponds No.1010 section side drains methods Site construction /CSC construction otherwise make provision of water harvesting EP Act 1986  Existence of observation cost pits intermittently. MORT&H proper and review Specifications drainage of for Road and system for documents Bridge disposal of works waste water 4.3 Alteration in  Existing drainage system to be maintained Design  Near all drainage  Design of road Review of Included in Contractor MPRDC surface water and further enhanced. requirement, channels, river crossings side drains Design construction / CSC hydrology due to  Provision shall be made for adequate size and Clause No etc. documents cost embankment number of cross drainage structures esp. in 501.8.6. Site the areas where land is sloping towards road MORT&H observation alignment. Specifications for  Road level shall be raised above HFL level Road and wherever road level is lesser than HFL. Bridge 4.4 Siltation in  Embankment slopes to be modified suitably to Design  Near all water bodies,  Siltation of Field Included in Contractor MPRDC water bodies due to restrict the soil debris entering water bodies. requirement, river embankment slopes. rivers, streams, observation construction /CSC construction  Provision of Silt fencing shall be made at Clause No ponds and cost activities/ earthwork water bodies. 501.8.6. other water MORT&H  Silt/sediment should be collected and bodies in Specifications stockpiled for possible reuse as surfacing of project area for Road and slopes where they have to be re-vegetated. Bridge works 4.5 Deterioration in  No vehicles or equipment should be parked or The Water  Water bodies, Refuelling  Water quality Conduction Included in Contractor MPRDC Surface water quality refuelled near water-bodies, so as to avoid (Prevention and stations, construction of ponds, of water construction /CSC due to leakage from contamination from fuel and lubricants. Control of camps. streams, rivers quality tests cost vehicles and  Oil and grease traps and fuelling platforms to Pollution) Act, and other as per the equipment’s and be provided at re-fuelling locations. 1974 and water bodies in monitoring waste from amendments plan Field  All chemicals and oil shall be stored away project area, construction camps. thereof. observation from water and concreted platform with catch  Presence of oil pit for spills collection. floating in  All equipment operators, drivers, and water bodies in warehouse personnel will be trained in project area immediate response for spill containment and eventual clean-up.  Construction camp to be sited away from water bodies.  Wastes must be collected, stored and taken to approve disposal site only.  Water quality shall be monitored periodically

212 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 5. Flora and Fauna 5.1 Vegetation  Minimize tree cutting to the extent possible. Forest  Throughout the project  ROW width, Review of Road side Relevant MPRDC loss due to site  Roadside trees to be removed with prior Conservation corridor  Number of Relevant plantation agency /CSC preparation and approval of competent authority. Act 1980, trees for felling documents– cost is specialized in construction activities IRC SP: 21 and tree cutting included in afforestation  Compensatory plantation at 1:10 basis and  Compensatory and IRC SP:66 permit, project costs. additional plantation as per the IRC guidelines plantation plan compensato in consultation with Forest Department.  Number of ry plantation  Regular maintenance of all trees planted. trees replanted plan ,  Provision of LPG in construction camp as fuel Field source to avoid tree cutting, wherever observation possible. s  Plantation of trees on both sides of the road. Integrate vegetation management (IVM).  In the event of design changes during the construction stages additional assessments including the possibility to save trees shall be made by the EA.  Road side Plantation Strategy as per IRC specifications including maturing. 6. ConstructionCamps 6.1 Impact  All camps should maintain minimum Design  All construction camps  Location of On site Included in Contractor and MPRDC associated with distance from following: Requirement camp sites and Observation construction EO /CSC location # 500 m from habitation, distance from , Interaction cost # 500 m from forest areas where possible, habitation/fores with workers # 500 m from water bodies where possible, t /water bodies and local # 500 m from through traffic route where community possible. 6.2 Worker’s Health  The location, layout and basic facility The building  All construction camps  Camp health Camp Part of the Contractor MPRDC in construction camp provision of each labour camp will be and other records, records, Contractors /CSC submitted to CSC prior to their construction. construction  Existence of Site costs The construction shall commence only after workers proper first aid observation, approval of CSC. (Regulation of kit in camp site Consultation Employment with local  The contractor will maintain necessary living  Complaints and Conditions people living accommodation and ancillary facilities in from local of Service) Act nearby functional and hygienic manner as approved people by the EA. 1996 and The Water  Adequate water and sanitary latrines with (Prevention septic tanks attached to soak pits shall be and Control of provided. Pollution) Act,  Preventive medical care to be provided to 1974 and workers including a First-Aid kit that must be amendments available in the camp. thereof  Waste disposal facilities such as dust bins must be provided in the camps and regular disposal of waste must be carried out.

Appendix 8 213

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision  The Contractor will take all precautions to protect the workers from insect and pest to reduce the risk to health. This includes the use of insecticides which should comply with local regulations.  No alcoholic liquor or prohibited drugs will be imported to, sell, give, and barter to the workers of host community.  Awareness raising to immigrant Workers /local community on communicable and sexually transmitted diseases. 7. Management of Construction Waste/Debris 7.1 Selection of  Unproductive/waste lands shall be selected Design  At all dumping sites  Location of Field survey Included in Contractor MPRDC Dumping Sites for dumping sites away from residential areas Requirement dumping sites, & interaction Construction /CSC and water bodies. and MORT&H  Public with local cost.  Dumping sites have adequate capacity equal guidelines complaints people to the amount of debris generated.  Public perception and consent from the village Panchayats has to be obtained before finalizing the location. 7.2 Reuse and  The existing bitumen surface shall be utilized MORT&H  Throughout the project  Percentage of Contractor Included in Contractor MPRDC disposal of for paving of cross roads, access roads, and guidelines corridor reuse of Records, Construction /CSC construction and paving works in construction sites and camps, existing Field cost. dismantled waste temporary traffic diversions, and haulage surface observation, routes. material Interaction  All excavated materials from roadway,  Method and with local shoulders, verges, drains, cross drainage will location of people be used for backfilling embankments, filling disposal site of pits, and landscaping. construction  Unusable and non-bituminous debris debris materials should be suitably disposed off at pre-designated disposal locations, with approval of the concerned authority. The bituminous wastes shall be disposed in secure landfill sites only in environmentally accepted manner. For removal of debris, wastes and its disposal MoRT&H guidelines should be followed.  Unusable and surplus materials, as determined by the Project Engineer, will be removed and disposed off-site.

214 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 8. TrafficManagementandSafety 8.1 Management of  Temporary traffic diversion shall be planned Design  Throughout the project  Traffic Review Included in Contractor MPRDC existing traffic and by the contractor and approved by the requirement corridor especially at management traffic construction /CSC safety Engineer’. and IRC SP:55 intersections. plan Safety management cost.  The traffic control plans shall contain details signs on site, plan Field of diversions; traffic safety arrangements  Number of observation of during construction; safety measures for traffic traffic night time traffic and precautions for accidents management transportation of hazardous materials. Traffic and safety control plans shall be prepared in line with system requirements of IRC- SP-55. Interaction with people in  The Contractor will ensure that the diversion vehicles using is always maintained in running condition, the road particularly during the monsoon to avoid disruption to traffic flow.  On stretches where it is not possible to pass the traffic on the part width of existing carriageway, temporary paved diversions will be constructed.  Restriction of construction activity to only one side of the existing road.  The contractor shall inform local community of changes to traffic routes, and pedestrian access arrangements with assistance from “Engineer”.  Use of adequate signage’s to ensure traffic management and safety.  Conduct of regular safety audit on safety measures. 8.2 Pedestrians,  Temporary access and diversion, with proper Design  Near habitation on both  Road signage Field Included in Contractor MPRDC animal movement drainage facilities. requirement, sides of schools, temples, & drainage as Observation, construction /CSC  Access to the schools, temples and other IRC-SP-27 for hospitals, graveyards, per IRC Interaction cost. public places must be maintained when recommendatio construction sites, guideline, with local construction takes place near them. ns of IRC haulage roads, diversion  Complaints people regional  Fencing wherever cattle movement is sites. from local workshops expected. people on Highway  To avoid the need for cattle underpasses, Safety, IRC- some of the proposed culverts near SP-32 for road habitations may be widened to facilitate cattle Safety for movement. Children, IRC- SP-44 for highway Safety, IRC- SP-55 for safety in road construction zone

Appendix 8 215

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 8.3 Safety of  Contractors to adopt and maintain safe  Construction sites  Availability of Site Included in Obligation of MPRDC Workers and working practices. safety gears to Observation, construction Contractor /CSC accident risk from  Usage of fluorescent and retro-reflectory workers, Review cost construction signage, in local language at the construction  Safety signage, records on activities safety training sites  Training records and accidents,  Training to workers on safety procedures and on safety, Interact with precautions.  Number of construction  Mandatory appointment of safety officer. safety related workers  All regulations regarding safe scaffolding, accidents ladders, working platforms, gangway, stairwells, excavations, trenches and safe means of entry and egress shall be complied With.  Provision of PPEs to workers.  Provision of a readily available first aid unit including an adequate supply of dressing materials.  The contractor will not employ any person below the age of 18 years for any work.  Use of hazardous material should be minimized and/or restricted.  Emergency plan (to be approved by engineer) shall be prepared to respond to any accidents or emergencies.  Accident Prevention Officer must be appointed by the contractor. 8.4 Accident risk to  Restrict access to construction sites to  Construction sites  Safety signs and Site Included in Contractor MPRDC local community authorized personnel. their location, inspection, construction /CSC  Physical separation must be provided for  Incidents of Consultation cost movement of vehicular and human traffic. accidents, with local people  Adequate signage must be provided for safe  Complaints from traffic movement. local people 9. Site restoration and rehabilitation 9.1 Clean-up  Contractor will prepare site restoration plans, Project  Throughout the project  Clean and Site Included in Contractor MPRDC Operations, which will be approved by the ‘Engineer’. requirement corridor, construction restored camp observation, construction /CSC Restoration and  The clean-up and restoration operations are to camp sites and borrow sites presence Interaction cost . Rehabilitation be implemented by the contractor prior to areas /absence of with locals, demobilization. construction Issue completion  All construction zones including river-beds, material/ debris certificate culverts, road-side areas, camps, hot mix after completion after plant sites, crushers, batching plant sites and of construction restoration of any other area used/affected by the project works on all sites are will be left clean and tidy, at the contractor's construction site found expense, to the satisfaction of the satisfactory Environmental officer.  All the opened borrow areas will be rehabilitated and ‘Engineer’ will certify in this regard.

216 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision C. Operation stage 1. Air quality 1.1 Air pollution  Roadside tree plantations shall be maintained. Environmental  Throughout the corridor  Ambient air As per Included in MPRDC / CSC due to due to  Regular maintenance of the road will be Protection Act, quality (PM10, CPCB Operation/ vehicular movement done to ensure good surface condition 1986; The Air CO, NOx) requirement Maintenance (Prevention and s, site cost  Vehicular air pollution will be managed  Survival rate of Control of inspection and monitored. trees planted Pollution) Act,  Ambient air quality monitoring. If monitored 1981 parameters are above the prescribed limit, suitable control measures must be taken.  Technological and behavioural changes.  Road signs shall be provided reminding the motorist to properly maintain their vehicles to economize on fuel consumption and protect the environment. 2. Noise

2.1 Noise due to  Effective traffic management and good Noise Pollution  Sensitive receptors  Noise levels Noise Included in MPRDC / CSC movement of traffic riding conditions shall be maintained to (Regulation and  Noise barriers has been monitoring Operation/ reduce the noise level throughout the stretch Control) Rules, proposed in total 412m as per noise Maintenance and speed limitation & honking restrictions 2000 and length (400m in HKM, rules, 2000, cost may be enforced near sensitive locations. amendments 12m in CG road) Discussion  The effectiveness of the multi-layered thereof with people plantation should be monitored and if need in sensitive be, solid noise barrier shall be placed. receptor sites  Create awareness amongst the residents about likely noise levels from road operation at different distances, the safe ambient noise limits and easy to implement noise reduction measures while constructing a building close to the road. 3. Land and Soil 3.1 Soil erosion at  Periodic checking to be carried to assess the Project  At bridge locations &  Existence of soil On site Included in MPRDC / CSC Embankment during effectiveness of the stabilization measures requirement embankment slopes and erosion sites observation Operation/ heavy rain fall. viz. turning, stone pitching, river training other probable soil  Number of soil Maintenance structures etc. erosion areas. erosion sites cost  Necessary measures to be followed wherever there are failures.

Appendix 8 217

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementati Supervision C. Operation stage on 4. Water resources/Flooding and Inundation 4.1 Siltation  Regular checks shall be made for soil erosion Project  Near surface water  Water quality Site Included in MPRDC / CSC and turning conditions of river training requirement bodies observation Operation/ structures for its effective maintenance. Maintenance cost 4.2 Water logging  Regular visual checks and cleaning of drains Project  Near surface water  Presence of Site Included in MPRDC / CSC due to blockage shall be done along the alignment to ensure requirement bodies flooded areas observation Operation/ of drains, culverts or that flow of water is maintained through cross or areas with Maintenance streams drains and other channels /streams. water stagnation e cost  Monitoring of water borne diseases due to stagnant water bodies.

4.3 Road inundation  MPRDC will ensure that all drains (side Project  Near surface water  Incidents of Field Included in MPRDC / CSC due to choking of drains and all cross drainages) are requirement bodies flooding & road observation, Operation/ drainage channels periodically cleared especially before inundation with Interaction Maintenance monsoon season to facilitate the quick details with local cost passage of rainwater and avoid flooding. community

5. Flora 5.1 Vegetation  Planted trees, shrubs, and grasses to be Forest  Project tree plantation  Minimum of Records and Operation MPRDC / CSC properly maintained. Conservation sites 70% of tree fields and  The tree survivalist audit to be conducted at Act 1980 survival observations Maintenance least once in a year to assess the Cost effectiveness. 6. Maintenance of Right of Way and Safety 6.1 Accident Risk  Efforts shall be made to make shoulder Project  Throughout the project  Presence of and Visual Included in MPRDC / CSC due to uncontrolled completely clear of vegetation. requirement route extent of Inspection, operation/ growth of vegetation  Regular maintenance of plantation along the vegetation Accident Maintenance roadside. growth on either records cost  Invasive plant not to be planted near the road. side of road Accident data 6.2 Accident risks  Traffic control measures, including speed IRC:SP:55  Throughout the project  Police records Review Included in MPRDC / CSC associated with traffic limits, will be enforced strictly. route on accident accident operation/ movement.  Further encroachment of squatters within the condition and records, Maintenance ROW will be prevented. existence of Site cost observation  No school or hospital will be allowed to be safety signs, s established beyond the stipulated planning rumble strips line as per relevant local law etc. on the road  Monitor/ensure that all safety provisions  Presence/ included in design and construction phase are absence of properly maintained sensitive receptor  Highway patrol unit(s) for round the clock structures inside patrolling. Phone booths for accidental the stipulated reporting and ambulance services with planning line as minimum response time for rescue of any per relevant accident victims, if possible. local law

218 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision C. Operation stage 6.3 Transport of  Existence of spill prevention and control and  Throughout the project  Status of Review of Included in MPRDC / CSC dangerous goods emergency responsive system. stretch emergency spill Operation/  Emergency plan for vehicles carrying system–whether prevention Maintenance hazardous material. operational or and cost. not emergency response system Spill

Note EA: Executing Agency , MPRDC: Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation, EO: Environmental Officer, IRC: Indian Road Congress c. The“Projectengineer”or “theengineer”istheteamof ConstructionSupervisionConsultants(CSC)responsiblefor approvingtheplans, engineeringdrawing,releaseofpaymentstocontractoretc.onbehalfoftheemployer(MPRDC).ItisusuallytheteamleaderoftheCSCthat takestheresponsibilityofsigningapprovaldocumentson behalfof theCSCteam. d. The “environmental officer” is the environmental specialist under the CSC who is responsible for providing recommendations to the CSC team leader for approving activities specific to environment safeguards on behalf of “the engineer”.

Appendix 8 219

Environmental Monitoring Plan (Contract Package No. 17) Environmental Monitoring Institutional Responsibility Location Frequency Components Parameters Special Guidance Standards Implementation Supervision

Note Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation, PIU- Project Implementation Unit, CSC- Construction Supervision Consultant

220 Appendix 8

SL. NO ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT RATE (Rs.) AMOUNT (Rs.) RESPONSIBILITY

A Forest Clearance and Compensatory Afforestation

Compensatory afforestation and avenue PIU through Forest A.1 plantation @1:10 trees including 3 year 8400 No. 1000 8400000 Department maintainance

B Environmental Monitoring

Ambient air quality monitoring during construction and operations phases (3 times in a B.1 year for 3 years or construction period 3 sites & 84 No. 9000 756000 Five years during operation/defect liability period, once in a year at three sites)

Ambient noise level monitoring during construction and operations phases (3 times in a B.2 year for 3 years or construction period 3 sites & 84 No. 3000 252000 Five years during operation/defect liability period, once in a year at three sites)

PIU through Approved Water quality monitoring of surface water during monitoring Agency construction and operations phases (3 times in a B.3 54 No. 5000 270000 year for 3 years or construction period at 3 location sites)

Water quality monitoring of drinking water during construction and operations phases (3 times in a B.4 54 No. 5000 270000 year for 3 years or construction period at 3 location sites)

Soil quality monitoring during construction and B.5 operations phases (3 times in a year for 3 years 54 No. 10000 540000 or construction period at 3 location sites)

C Noise Barrier at Sensitive Location

Provide the Noise barrier at sensitive areas like schools and temples.The noise barriers of hollow Contractor through C.1 brick wall/reinforced concrete panels with height 412 Rm 2000 824000 BOQ of 3.5m. The design of the noise barrier shall be approved by the engineer in charge.

D Solid Waste Management

Solid Waste Management during entire project D.1 72 No. 3000/; month 216000 period

E Dust Suppression

Dust Suppression along the entire project length 2000/- per day E.1 1440 No. 2880000 three tankers in a days for 240 Days per tanker F Environmental Training

PIU through Training at site : Three training sessions during 50000 per F.1 6 per sessions 300000 Supervision construction period session Consultant TOTAL COST = 14708000

Appendix 8 221

Appendix 8c: Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan (Contract Package No. 18)

Environmental Management Plan (Contract Package No. 18)

This EMP is applicable to three subproject road included in Civil Works Contract Package No 18 i.e. 1) Parsona-Mada Road, 2) Mada-Ramgarh Road and 3) Jhurai-Sarai Road EnvironmentalIssue / Referenceto Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility RemedialMeasure Location Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision A. Pre-construction and Design Stage 1. Alignment 1.1 Pavement  Provision of adequate side drains to Design  Side drains have been  Design of both Review of Included in Design MPRDC / damage and evacuate the rain water and domestic requirement proposed in Parsona, cross & side detail design construction Consultant CSC inadequate drainage discharges (drained by habitats Khutar, Rajmilan&Mada drains, documents & cost provision in habitat occasionally) to prevent damage to road villages in PM road (1.785  No. of CD drawings areas and rain water entry to habitats’ houses. Km both side), in Mada structures &  Provision of adequate no. of cross drainage villages in MR (0.600 Km their spans structures based on drainage pattern around both side) but no side drain the alignment. proposed in JS road.  Existing CD structures are sufficient. No new CD structures proposed except in PM road where one new HPC proposed at Km 13+000. 1.2 Loss of 510  Restricting tree cutting within construction Design  Throughout the alignment  No. of trees to Observation, Included in Design MPRDC trees and vegetation limit. requirement, be cut construction Consultant CSC cover @ 54 at  Avoiding tree cutting at ancillary sites. cost Parsona-Mada Road,  Providing and maintaining compensatory 376 at Mada- tree plantation of 5100 trees @ 1:10 ratio. Ramgarh Road and 80 at Jhurai-Sarai Road 1.3 Protection of  Careful selection of alignment to avoid Project Location of temples, schools  Design and Review of Included in Contractor MPRDC / sensitive receptors damages to the sensitive receptors requirement and other sensitive receptors alignment plan design construction CSC  Timely scheduling of construction along the project roads (Refer activities to Table. 25).  Provision of noise suitable barriers

222 Appendix 8

EnvironmentalIssue / Referenceto Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility RemedialMeasure Location Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision 1.4 Safety along the  Provision of retro-reflective warning sign Design  139 numbers of different  No. of accident Field Included in Design MPRDC / proposed alignment boards nears school, hospital, religious requirement, types of sign boards & Vehicle observation, construction Consultant CSC places, and other areas, speed restriction IRC-67 for proposed in PM road, 52 collisions interview of cost sign in built-ups, forests areas etc. road signs, numbers in MR road & 244 locals IRC-73 for  Improving substandard curves, grading & numbers in JS road. geometric other geometric features as per IRC  Substandard curves have design Standards been improved at Km standards,  Provision of metal beam crash IRC-119 for 16+200, 19+250 & 24+000 in barriers/guard stones at high embankment traffic safety, PM road and at Km 4+950 to locations. IRC-75 for 5+100, 5+900 to 6+050,  Provision of slope stabilization measures in slope 8+700 to 9+200 & 10+300 to high embankment/cutting to prevent any stabilisation in 10+500 in MR road. land slide situation. high  Length of W-beam crash embankment barriers (where height of embankment is more than 3.0 m) provided in PM road is 1000 m (bothside), 1000 m (bothside) in MR and 1200 m (bothside) in JS road 2. Natural Hazards 2.1 Protection for  Design considering relevant IRC guidelines IRC-6 for  Throughout the stretch  Incorporation Review of Project Design MPRDC / damage from for earthquakes in bridges. structure of IRC bridge preparation Consultant CSC Earthquake design, guidelines for design Cost IS-1893 for earthquake in earthquake bridge design resistant design 2.2 Protection of  Raise embankment height above the HFL IRC-34 for road  Sub-grade top has been  Design of Included in Design MPRDC / road embankment in levels in the flood prone areas. construction in kept 0.6m above HFL embankment/ construction Consultant CSC Flood prone Areas  Improvement in existing culverts/ Bridges to water logged throughout the stretch and road profile, cost areas and increase their carrying capacity. profile has been raised at  Design of both

water logged areas. cross & side  Provision of adequate balancing culverts. IRC-75 for  26 structures (26 HPC) are drains, design of high proposed to be embankment  No. of CD reconstructed in PM road, structures & 15 structures (15 HPC) in their spans MR road, 37 structures (35 HPC, 2 slab culverts) in JS road  Existing CD structures are sufficient. No new CD structures proposed. 3. Shifting of utility structures

Appendix 8 223

EnvironmentalIssue / Referenceto Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility RemedialMeasure Location Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision 3.1 Disruption of  All telephone and electrical poles/wires and Project  The contractor will shift all  Utility shifting Interaction Included in Contractor/ MPRDC / utility services to underground cables should be shifted requirement utility structure throughout plan with Construction CSC CSC local community before start of construction. the corridor with permission  Complaints concerned cost  Necessary permission and payments from relevant authorities from local utility should be made to relevant utility service before commencement of people authorities and local agencies to allow quick shifting and physical works.  Status of local public restoration of utility services. utility services  Local people must be informed through appropriate means about the time of shifting of utility structures and potential disruption of services if any. B. Construction Stage 1. Air Quality 1.1 Dust generation  Transport, loading and unloading of loose MORT&H  Throughout the project  PM10 level Standards Included in Contractor MPRDC due to construction and fine materials through covered Specifications corridor. measurement, CPCB project cost /CSC activities & transport, vehicles. for Road and  Dust pollution methods of Bridge works, storage and handling  Paved approach roads. or complain of observation of construction Air (P & CP) s,  Storage areas to be located downwind of locals materials Act 1974 and Public the habitation area. Central Motor consultation  Water spraying on earthworks, unpaved and Vehicle haulage roads and other dust prone areas. Act 1988  Provision of PPEs to workers. 1.2 Emission of air  Regular maintenance of machinery and The Air  Asphalt mixing plants,  Monitoring of Standards Included in Contractor MPRDC / pollutants (HC, SO2, equipment. (P & CP) crushers, DG sets locations ambient air CPCB project cost CSC NOX, CO etc) from  Batching, asphalt mixing plants and Act,1981 quality & methods (Amended198 vehicles due to traffic crushers at downwind (1km) direction from checking PUC 7) and congestion & use of the nearest settlement. certificates equipment and Rules1982  Only crushers licensed by the PCB shall machinery be used.

 DG sets with stacks of adequate height and use of low sulphur diesel as fuel.  Ambient air quality monitoring.

224 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 2. Noise 2.1 Noise from  All equipment to be timely serviced and Legal requirement  Throughout project  Noise levels As per Noise Included in Contractor MPRDC Construction vehicle, properly maintained. section especially at measurements rule, 2000 project cost /CSC equipment and  Construction equipment and machinery to Noise Pollution construction sites,  Complaints from Consultation Plantation (Regulation and cost is machinery. be fitted with silencers and maintained residential and local people with local Control) Rules, separate properly. identified sensitive people 2000 and locations.  Only IS approved equipment shall be used amendments Noise barriers has for construction activities. Thereof + Clause   Timing of noisy construction activities shall No 501.8.6. been proposed in be done during night time and weekends near MORT&H total 1760m length schools and selected suitable times near Specifications for (1000m in PM, 60m temples when there are no visitors, concurrent Road and Bridge in MR and 700m in noisy operations may be separated to reduce works JS road) the total noise generated, and if possible re- route traffic during construction to avoid the accumulation of noise beyond standards. Else provision of temporary noise barrier at sensitive locations or near sources.  Time regulation near residential, built up and forest areas construction shall be restricted to daylight hours.  Initiation of multi layered plantation, to serve as mitigation option for operation phase.  Provision of Noise barriers at sensitive locations  Noise monitoring as per EMoP.

3. Land and Soil 3.1 Land use  Non-agricultural areas to be used as borrow Project requirement  Throughout the  Borrow pit Review Included in Contractor MPRDC Change and Loss of areas to the extent possible. project section and Locations Top borrow area construction /CSC productive/top soil  If using agricultural land, top soil to be  Borrow areas (Km 7 soil storage area plan, site cost preserved and laid over either on the & Km 18.3 of PM visits embankment slope for growing vegetation to road, Km 1 & Km protect soil erosion. 3.5of MR road and Km 26, Km 28 & Km

3. Land and Soil 31 of JS road) 3.2 Slope failure  Bio-turfing of embankments to protect slopes. IRC-56 for  Throughout the  Occurrence of Review of Included in Design MPRDC and soil erosion due  Slope protection by providing dry stone treatment of entire project road slope failure or design Construction consultant and /CSC to construction pitching, masonry retaining walls, planting of embankment slopes especially along hilly erosion issues documents cost Contractor, for erosion control, activities, earthwork, grass and trees. areas and site and cut and fill, Clause No. observation  The side slopes of all cut and fill areas will be stockpiles etc. 306 and 305.2.2 graded and covered with stone pitching, MORT&H grass and shrub as per design specifications. Specifications for  Care should be taken that the slope gradient Road and Bridge shall not be greater than 2:1. works, Guidelines IX for Soil erosion

Appendix 8 225

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision 3.3 Borrow site  Non-productive, barren lands, upland shall be IRC-10 for  Borrow areas (Km 7  Existence of Review of Included in Design MPRDC locations used for borrowing earth with the necessary guidelines on & Km 18.3 of PM borrow areas in design Construction consultant and /CSC permissions/consents. borrow areas and road, Km 1 & Km inappropriate document s cost Contractor,  Depths of borrow pits to be regulated and for quarries, 3.5of MR road and unauthorized and site sides not steeper than 25%. Environmental Km 26, Km 28 & Km locations. observation Protection Act and  Topsoil to be stockpiled and protected for use 31 of JS road).  Poor borrow Rules, 1986; at the rehabilitation stage.  These are located area Water Act, Air Act, away from management  Transportation of earth materials through Clause No. covered vehicles. habitation areas & practices. 305.2.2 MORT&H mainly are non-  To the extent borrow areas shall be sited  Incidents of Specifications for productive barren away from habitation areas. Borrow areas accidents. Road and Bridge lands. shall be levelled with salvaged material or works Guidelines V  Complaints from other filling materials which do not pose for Borrow Areas local people. contamination of soil. management

3.4 Quarry  Aggregates will be sourced from existing Clause 111.3  Quarry area  Existence of Review of Included in Contractor MPRDC operations licensed quarries. MORT&H locations licenses for all design Construction /CSC  Copies of consent/ approval / rehabilitation Specifications for quarry areas document s, cost plan for a new quarry or use of existing Road and Bridge from which contractor source will be submitted to EO, MPRDC. works, materials are document s Guidelines VI for and site  The contractor will develop a Quarry being sourced quarry area observation Redevelopment plan, as per the Mining Rules  Complaints from management of the state and submit a copy of the local people. approval to EA.

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 3. Land and Soil 3.5 Compaction of  Construction vehicles, machinery and Design requirement  Parking areas,  Location of Site Included in Contractor MPRDC soil and impact on equipment to be stationed in the designated  Haulage roads and approach and observation construction /CSC quarry haul roads ROW to avoid compaction. construction yards. haulage cost due to movement of  Approach roads/haulage roads shall be roads vehicles and designed along the barren and hard soil area  Presence of equipment to reduce the compaction. destroyed  Transportation of quarry material to the /compacted dumping site through heavy vehicles shall be agricultural done through existing major roads to the land or land extent possible to restrict wear and tear to the which has not village/minor roads. be restored to  Land taken for construction camp and other its original temporary facility shall be restored to its condition original conditions.

226 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision 3.6 Contamination  Construction vehicles and equipment will Design requirement  Fuelling station,  Quality of soil Site Included in Contractor MPRDC of soil due to be maintained and refuelled in such a fashion construction sites, near storage observation Construction /CSC leakage /spillage of that oil/diesel spillage does not contaminate and construction area cost. oil, bituminous and the soil. camps and disposal  Presence of non-bituminous  Fuel storage and refuelling sites to be kept location. spilled oil or debris generated away from drainage channels. bitumen in from demolition and  Unusable debris shall be dumped in ditches project area road construction and low lying areas.  To avoid soil contamination Oil-Interceptors shall be provided at wash down and refuelling areas.  Waste oil and oil soaked cotton/ cloth shall be stored in containers labelled ‘Waste Oil’ and ‘Hazardous’ sold off to MoEF/SPCB authorized vendors.  Non-bituminous wastes to be dumped in borrow pits with the concurrence of landowner and covered with a layer of topsoil conserved from opening the pit.  Bituminous wastes will be disposed off in an identified dumping site approved by the State Pollution Control Board. 4. WaterResources 4.1 Sourcing of  Requisite permission shall be obtained for -  Throughout the  Approval checking of Included in Contractor MPRDC water during abstraction of groundwater from Central project section from documentation construction /CSC construction Groundwater Authority. competent on Talk to local cost  Arrangements shall be made by contractor authority, people that the water availability and supply to  complaints nearby communities remain unaffected. from local people on water availability B. Construction Stage 4. WaterResources 4.2 Disposal of  Provisions shall be made to connect road Clause No.1010  Throughout the  Design of Standards Included in Contractor MPRDC water during side drains with exiting nearby ponds EP Act 1986 Project section road side methods Site construction /CSC construction otherwise make provision of water harvesting MORT&H drains observation and cost pits intermittently. Specifications for  Existence of review of Road and Bridge proper documents works drainage system for disposal of 4.3 Alteration in  Existing drainage system to be maintained Design  Near all drainage  Designwaste water of Review of Included in Contractor MPRDC surface water and further enhanced. requirement, channels, river road side Design construction /CSC hydrology due to  Provision shall be made for adequate size Clause No 501.8.6. crossings etc. drains documents cost embankment and number of cross drainage structures esp. MORT&H Site observation in the areas where land is sloping towards Specifications for road alignment. Road and Bridge  Road level shall be raised above HFL level wherever road level is lesser than HFL.

Appendix 8 227

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision 4.4 Siltation in  Embankment slopes to be modified suitably to Design  Near all water  Siltation of Field Included in Contractor MPRDC water bodies due to restrict the soil debris entering water bodies. requirement, bodies, river rivers, observation construction /CSC construction  Provision of Silt fencing shall be made at Clause No 501.8.6. embankment streams, cost activities/ earthwork water bodies. MORT&H slopes. ponds and Specifications for  Silt/sediment should be collected and other water Road and Bridge stockpiled for possible reuse as surfacing of bodies in works slopes where they have to be re-vegetated. project area

4.5 Deterioration in  No vehicles or equipment should be parked or The Water  Water bodies,  Water quality Conduction Included in Contractor MPRDC Surface water quality refuelled near water-bodies, so as to avoid (Prevention and Refuelling stations, of ponds, of water quality construction /CSC due to leakage from contamination from fuel and lubricants. Control of construction camps. streams, tests as per the cost vehicles and  Oil and grease traps and fuelling platforms to Pollution) Act, 1974 rivers and monitoring plan equipment’s and be provided at re-fuelling locations. and amendments other water Field observation waste from thereof.  All chemicals and oil shall be stored away bodies in construction camps. from water and concreted platform with catch project area, pit for spills collection.  Presence of  All equipment operators, drivers, and oil floating in warehouse personnel will be trained in water bodies immediate response for spill containment and in project eventual clean-up. area  Construction camp to be sited away from water bodies.  Wastes must be collected, stored and taken to approve disposal site only.  Water quality shall be monitored periodically 5. Flora and Fauna 5.1 Vegetation  Minimize tree cutting to the extent possible. Forest  Throughout the  ROW width, Review of Road side Relevant agency MPRDC loss due to site  Roadside trees to be removed with prior Conservation project corridor  Number of Relevant plantation cost specialized in /CSC preparation and approval of competent authority. Act 1980, trees for documents– tree is included in afforestation construction IRC SP: 21 and cutting project costs.  Compensatory plantation at 1:10 basis and felling activities and IRC SP:66 permit, additional plantation as per the IRC guidelines  Compensator compensatory in consultation with Forest Department. y plantation plantation plan , plan  Regular maintenance of all trees planted. Field  Provision of LPG in construction camp as fuel  Number of observation s source to avoid tree cutting, wherever trees possible. replanted  Plantation of trees on both sides of the road. Integrate vegetation management (IVM).  In the event of design changes during the construction stages additional assessments including the possibility to save trees shall be made by the EA.  Road side Plantation Strategy as per IRC specifications including maturing. 6. ConstructionCamps

228 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision 6.1 Impact  All camps should maintain minimum Design  All construction  Location of On site Included in Contractor and MPRDC associated with distance from following: Requirement camps camp sites Observation, construction EO /CSC location # 500 m from habitation, and distance Interaction with cost # 500 m from forest areas where possible, from workers and # 500 m from water bodies where possible, habitation/for local # 500 m from through traffic route where est /water community possible. bodies 6.2 Worker’s Health  The location, layout and basic facility The building and  All construction  Camp health Camp records, Part of the Contractor MPRDC in construction camp provision of each labour camp will be other construction camps records, Site observation, Contractors /CSC submitted to CSC prior to their construction. workers  Existence of Consultation with costs The construction shall commence only after (Regulation of proper first local people approval of CSC. Employment and aid kit in living nearby  The contractor will maintain necessary living Conditions of camp site Service) Act 1996 accommodation and ancillary facilities in  Complaints and The Water functional and hygienic manner as approved from local (Prevention and by the EA. people Control of  Adequate water and sanitary latrines with Pollution) Act, septic tanks attached to soak pits shall be 1974 and provided. amendments  Preventive medical care to be provided to thereof workers including a First-Aid kit that must be available in the camp.  Waste disposal facilities such as dust bins must be provided in the camps and regular disposal of waste must be carried out.  The Contractor will take all precautions to protect the workers from insect and pest to reduce the risk to health. This includes the use of insecticides which should comply with local regulations.  No alcoholic liquor or prohibited drugs will be imported to, sell, give, and barter to the workers of host community.  Awareness raising to immigrant Workers /local community on communicable and sexually transmitted diseases. 7. Management of Construction Waste/Debris 7.1 Selection of  Unproductive/waste lands shall be selected Design  At all dumping sites  Location of Field survey Included in Contractor MPRDC Dumping Sites for dumping sites away from residential areas Requirement and dumping & interaction with Construction /CSC and water bodies. MORT&H sites, local cost.  Dumping sites have adequate capacity equal guidelines  Public people to the amount of debris generated. complaints  Public perception and consent from the village Panchayats has to be obtained before finalizing the location.

Appendix 8 229

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision 7.2 Reuse and  The existing bitumen surface shall be utilized MORT&H  Throughout the  Percentage Contractor Included in Contractor MPRDC disposal of for paving of cross roads, access roads, and guidelines project corridor of reuse of Records, Field Construction /CSC construction and paving works in construction sites and camps, existing observation, cost. dismantled waste temporary traffic diversions, and haulage surface Interaction with routes. material local people  All excavated materials from roadway,  Method and shoulders, verges, drains, cross drainage will location of be used for backfilling embankments, filling disposal site pits, and landscaping. of  Unusable and non-bituminous debris construction materials should be suitably disposed off at debris pre-designated disposal locations, with approval of the concerned authority. The bituminous wastes shall be disposed in secure landfill sites only in environmentally accepted manner. For removal of debris, wastes and its disposal MoRT&H guidelines should be followed.  Unusable and surplus materials, as determined by the Project Engineer, will be removed and disposed off-site. 8. TrafficManagementandSafety 8.1 Management of  Temporary traffic diversion shall be planned Design requirement  Throughout the  Traffic Review Included in Contractor MPRDC existing traffic and by the contractor and approved by the and IRC SP:55 project corridor management traffic construction / CSC safety Engineer’. especially at plan Safety signs management cost.  The traffic control plans shall contain details intersections. on site, plan Field of diversions; traffic safety arrangements  Number of traffic observation of during construction; safety measures for accidents traffic night time traffic and precautions for management transportation of hazardous materials. Traffic and safety control plans shall be prepared in line with system requirements of IRC- SP-55. Interaction with people in  The Contractor will ensure that the diversion vehicles using is always maintained in running condition, the road particularly during the monsoon to avoid disruption to traffic flow.  On stretches where it is not possible to pass the traffic on the part width of existing carriageway, temporary paved diversions will be constructed.  Restriction of construction activity to only one side of the existing road.  The contractor shall inform local community of changes to traffic routes, and pedestrian access arrangements with assistance from “Engineer”.  Use of adequate signage’s to ensure traffic management and safety.  Conduct of regular safety audit on safety measures.

230 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision 8.2 Pedestrians,  Temporary access and diversion, with proper Design  Near habitation on  Road signage & Field Included in Contractor MPRDC animal movement drainage facilities. requirement, IRC- both sides of drainage as per Observation, construction /CSC  Access to the schools, temples and other SP-27 for schools, temples, IRC guideline, Interaction cost. public places must be maintained when recommendations hospitals,  Complaints from with local construction takes place near them. of IRC regional graveyards, local people people workshops on  Fencing wherever cattle movement is construction sites, Highway Safety, expected. haulage roads, IRC-SP-32 for road diversion sites.  To avoid the need for cattle underpasses, Safety for some of the proposed culverts near Children, IRC-SP- habitations may be widened to facilitate cattle 44 for highway movement. Safety, IRC-SP-55 for safety in road construction zone B. Construction Stage 8.3 Safety of  Contractors to adopt and maintain safe  Construction sites  Availability of Site Included in Obligation of MPRDC Workers and working practices. safety gears to Observation, construction Contractor /CSC accident risk from  Usage of fluorescent and retro-reflectory workers, Review cost construction signage, in local language at the construction  Safety signage, records on activities safety training sites  Training records and  Training to workers on safety procedures and on safety, accidents, precautions.  Number of safety Interact with  Mandatory appointment of safety officer. related accidents construction  All regulations regarding safe scaffolding, workers ladders, working platforms, gangway, stairwells, excavations, trenches and safe means of entry and egress shall be complied With.  Provision of PPEs to workers.  Provision of a readily available first aid unit including an adequate supply of dressing materials.  The contractor will not employ any person below the age of 18 years for any work.  Use of hazardous material should be minimized and/or restricted.  Emergency plan (to be approved by engineer) shall be prepared to respond to any accidents or emergencies.  Accident Prevention Officer must be appointed by the contractor. 8.4 Accident risk to  Restrict access to construction sites to  Construction sites  Safety signs and Site Included in Contractor MPRDC local community authorized personnel. their location, inspection, construction /CSC  Physical separation must be provided for  Incidents of Consultation cost movement of vehicular and human traffic. accidents, with local people  Adequate signage must be provided for safe  Complaints from traffic movement. local people 9. Site restoration and rehabilitation

Appendix 8 231

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision 9.1 Clean-up  Contractor will prepare site restoration plans, Project  Throughout the  Clean and Site Included in Contractor MPRDC Operations, which will be approved by the ‘Engineer’. requirement project corridor, restored camp observation, construction /CSC Restoration and  The clean-up and restoration operations are construction camp sites presence Interaction cost . Rehabilitation to be implemented by the contractor prior to sites and borrow /absence of with locals, demobilization. areas construction Issue completion  All construction zones including river-beds, material/ debris certificate culverts, road-side areas, camps, hot mix after completion after plant sites, crushers, batching plant sites and of construction restoration any other area used/affected by the project works on of all sites will be left clean and tidy, at the contractor's construction site are found expense, to the satisfaction of the satisfactory Environmental officer.  All the opened borrow areas will be rehabilitated and ‘Engineer’ will certify in this regard. C. Operation stage 1. Air quality 1.1 Air pollution  Roadside tree plantations shall be maintained. Environmental  Throughout the  Ambient air As per Included in MPRDC / CSC due to due to  Regular maintenance of the road will be Protection Act, corridor quality (PM10, CPCB Operation/ vehicular movement done to ensure good surface condition 1986; The Air CO, NOx) requirement Maintenance (Prevention and s, site cost  Vehicular air pollution will be managed  Survival rate of Control of inspection and monitored. trees planted Pollution) Act, 1981  Ambient air quality monitoring. If monitored parameters are above the prescribed limit, suitable control measures must be taken.  Technological and behavioural changes.  Road signs shall be provided reminding the motorist to properly maintain their vehicles to economize on fuel consumption and protect the environment. 2. Noise 2.1 Noise due to  Effective traffic management and good Noise Pollution  Sensitive receptors  Noise levels Noise Included in MPRDC / CSC movement of traffic riding conditions shall be maintained to (Regulation and  Noise barriers has monitoring Operation/ reduce the noise level throughout the stretch Control) Rules, been proposed in as per noise Maintenance and speed limitation & honking restrictions 2000 and total 1760m length rules, 2000, cost may be enforced near sensitive locations. amendments (1000m in PM, 60m Discussion  The effectiveness of the multi-layered thereof in MR and 700m in with people plantation should be monitored and if need JS road) in sensitive be, solid noise barrier shall be placed. receptor sites  Create awareness amongst the residents about likely noise levels from road operation at different distances, the safe ambient noise limits and easy to implement noise reduction measures while constructing 3. Land and Soil a building close to the road.

232 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision 3.1 Soil erosion at  Periodic checking to be carried to assess the Project requirement  At bridge locations  Existence of soil On site Included in MPRDC / CSC Embankment during effectiveness of the stabilization measures & embankment erosion sites observation Operation/ heavy rain fall. viz. turning, stone pitching, river training slopes and other  Number of soil Maintenance structures etc. probable soil erosion sites cost  Necessary measures to be followed wherever erosion areas. there are failures. C. Operation stage 4. Water resources/Flooding and Inundation 4.1 Siltation  Regular checks shall be made for soil erosion Project requirement  Near surface water  Water quality Site Included in MPRDC / CSC and turning conditions of river training bodies observation Operation/ structures for its effective maintenance. Maintenance cost 4.2 Water logging  Regular visual checks and cleaning of drains Project requirement  Near surface water  Presence of Site Included in MPRDC / CSC due to blockage shall be done along the alignment to ensure bodies flooded areas or observation Operation/ of drains, culverts or that flow of water is maintained through cross areas with water Maintenance streams drains and other channels /streams. stagnation e cost  Monitoring of water borne diseases due to stagnant water bodies. 4.3 Road inundation  MPRDC will ensure that all drains (side Project requirement  Near surface water  Incidents of Field Included in MPRDC / CSC due to choking of drains and all cross drainages) are bodies flooding & road observation, Operation/ drainage channels periodically cleared especially before inundation with Interaction Maintenance monsoon season to facilitate the quick details with local cost passage of rainwater and avoid flooding. community 5. Flora 5.1 Vegetation  Planted trees, shrubs, and grasses to be Forest Conservation  Project tree  Minimum of 70% Records and Operation MPRDC / CSC properly maintained. Act 1980 plantation sites of tree survival fields and  The tree survivalist audit to be conducted at observations Maintenance least once in a year to assess the Cost effectiveness. 6. Maintenance of Right of Way and Safety 6.1 Accident Risk  Efforts shall be made to make shoulder Project requirement  Throughout the  Presence of and Visual Included in MPRDC / CSC due to uncontrolled completely clear of vegetation. project route extent of Inspection, operation/ growth of vegetation  Regular maintenance of plantation along the vegetation growth Accident Maintenance roadside. on either side of records cost  Invasive plant not to be planted near the road. road Accident data

Appendix 8 233

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision 6.2 Accident risks  Traffic control measures, including speed IRC:SP:55  Throughout the  Police records on Review Included in MPRDC / CSC associated with limits, will be enforced strictly. project route accident accident operation/ traffic movement.  Further encroachment of squatters within the condition and records, Maintenance ROW will be prevented. existence of Site cost observation  No school or hospital will be allowed to be safety signs, s established beyond the stipulated planning rumble strips etc. line as per relevant local law on the road  Monitor/ensure that all safety provisions  Presence/ included in design and construction phase are absence of properly maintained sensitive receptor structures inside  Highway patrol unit(s) for round the clock the stipulated patrolling. Phone booths for accidental planning line as reporting and ambulance services with per relevant local minimum response time for rescue of any law accident victims, if possible. C. Operation stage 6.3 Transport of  Existence of spill prevention and control and  Throughout the  Status of Review of Included in MPRDC / CSC dangerous goods emergency responsive system. project stretch emergency spill Operation/  Emergency plan for vehicles carrying system–whether prevention Maintenance hazardous material. operational or not and cost. emergency response system Spill

Note EA: Executing Agency , MPRDC: Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation, EO: Environmental Officer, IRC: Indian Road Congress e. The“Projectengineer”or “theengineer”istheteamof ConstructionSupervisionConsultants(CSC)responsiblefor approvingtheplans, engineeringdrawing,releaseofpaymentstocontractoretc.onbehalfoftheemployer(MPRDC).ItisusuallytheteamleaderoftheCSCthat takestheresponsibilityofsigningapprovaldocumentson behalfof theCSCteam. f. The “environmental officer” is the environmental specialist under the CSC who is responsible for providing recommendations to the CSC team leader for approving activities specific to environment safeguards on behalf of “the engineer”.

234 Appendix 8

Environmental Monitoring Plan (Contract Package No. 18) Environmental Monitoring Institutional Responsibility Location Frequency Components Parameters Special Guidance Standards Implementation Supervision

Note Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation, PIU- Project Implementation Unit, CSC- Construction Supervision Consultant

Appendix 8 235

SL. NO ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT RATE (Rs.) AMOUNT (Rs.) RESPONSIBILITY

A Forest Clearance and Compensatory Afforestation

Compensatory afforestation and avenue PIU through Forest A.1 plantation @1:10 trees including 3 year 5100 No. 1000 5100000 Department maintainance

B Environmental Monitoring

Water quality monitoring of drinking water during construction and operations phases (3 times in a B.4 81 No. 5000 405000 year for 3 years or construction period at 3 location sites)

Soil quality monitoring during construction and B.5 operations phases (3 times in a year for 3 years 81 No. 10000 810000 or construction period at 3 location sites)

C Noise Barrier at Sensitive Location

Provide the Noise barrier at sensitive areas like schools and temples.The noise barriers of hollow Contractor through C.1 brick wall/reinforced concrete panels with height 1760 Rm 2000 3520000 BOQ of 3.5m. The design of the noise barrier shall be approved by the engineer in charge.

D Solid Waste Management

Solid Waste Management during entire project D.1 108 No. 3000/; month 324000 period

E Dust Suppression

Dust Suppression along the entire project length 2000/- per day E.1 2160 No. 4320000 three tankers in a days for 240 Days per tanker F Environmental Training

PIU through Training at site : Three training sessions during 50000 per F.1 9 per sessions 450000 Supervision construction period session Consultant

TOTAL COST = 16846000

236 Appendix 8

Appendix 8d: Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan (Contract Package No. 19)

Environmental Management Plan (Contract Package No. 19)

This EMP is applicable to one subproject road included in Civil Works Contract Package No 19 i.e. 1) Sohagpur-Manpur Road Institutional Responsibility EnvironmentalIssue / Referenceto Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation RemedialMeasure Location Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision

A. Pre-construction andDesignStage 1. Alignment 1.1 Pavement  Provision of adequate side drains to evacuate Design  Side drains have been  Design of both Review of Included in Design MPRDC damage and the rain water and domestic discharges requirement proposed in Bakeli&Bijauri cross & side detail design construction Consultant /CSC inadequate drainage (drained by habitats occasionally) to prevent villages (1.500 Km both drains, documents & cost provision in habitat damage to road and rain water entry to side)  No. of CD drawings areas habitats’ houses.  Existing CD structures are structures &  Provision of adequate no. of cross drainage sufficient. No new CD their spans structures based on drainage pattern around structures proposed. the alignment. 1.2 Loss of 197  Restricting tree cutting within construction Design  Throughout the alignment  No. of trees to Observation, Included in Design MPRDC trees and vegetation limit. requirement, be cut construction Consultant /CSC cover  Avoiding tree cutting at ancillary sites. cost  Providing and maintaining compensatory tree plantation of 1970 trees @ 1:10 ratio. 1.3 Protection of  Careful selection of alignment to avoid Project  Design and Review of Included in Contractor MPRDC / sensitive receptors damages to the sensitive receptors requirement Location of temples, schools alignment plan design construction CSC  Timely scheduling of construction activities and other sensitive receptors  Provision of noise suitable barriers along the project roads (Refer to Table. 25). 1.4 Safety along the  Provision of retro-reflective warning sign Design  460 numbers of different  No. of accident Field Included in Design MPRDC / proposed alignment boards nears school, hospital, religious requirement, types of sign boards & Vehicle observation, construction Consultant CSC places, and other areas, speed restriction sign IRC-67 for proposed in SM road as collisions interview of cost in built-ups, forests areas etc. road signs, traffic safety measure. locals IRC-73 for  Improving substandard curves, grading &  Substandard curves have geometric other geometric features as per IRC been improved at Km design Standards 14+125, 14+950, 52+900, standards,  Provision of metal beam crash barriers/guard IRC-119 for 53200, 53+450 and 57+300 stones at high embankment locations. traffic safety,  Length of W-beam crash  Provision of slope stabilization measures in IRC-75 for barriers (where height of high embankment/cutting to prevent any land slope embankment is more than slide situation. stabilisation 3.0 m) provided is 1200 m in high (bothside). embankment

Appendix 8 237

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision A. Pre-construction and Design Stage 2. Natural Hazards 2.1 Protection for  Design considering relevant IRC guidelines for IRC-6 for  Throughout the stretch  Incorporation Review of Project Design MPRDC / damage from earthquakes in bridges. structure of IRC bridge preparation Consultant CSC Earthquake design, guidelines for design Cost IS-1893 for earthquake in earthquake bridge design resistant design 2.2 Protection of  Raise embankment height above the HFL IRC-34 for  Sub-grade top has been  Design of Included in Design MPRDC / road embankment in levels in the flood prone areas. road kept 0.6m above HFL embankment/ construction Consultant CSC Flood prone Areas  Improvement in existing culverts/ Bridges to construction in throughout the stretch and road profile, cost water logged increase their carrying capacity. profile has been raised at  Design of both areas and water logged areas. cross & side  Provision of adequate balancing culverts.  23 structures (19 HPC, 2 drains, IRC-75 for FCW & 2 VCW) are design of high  No. of CD embankment proposed to be structures & reconstructed. their spans  Existing CD structures are sufficient. No new CD structures proposed. 3. Shifting of utility structures 3.1 Disruption of  All telephone and electrical poles/wires and Project  The contractor will shift all  Utility shifting Interaction Included in Contractor/ MPRDC utility services to underground cables should be shifted before requirement utility structure throughout plan with Construction SQC CSC local community start of construction. the corridor with  Complaints concerned cost  Necessary permission and payments should permission from relevant from local utility be made to relevant utility service agencies to authorities before people authorities and local allow quick shifting and restoration of utility commencement of physical  Status of local public services. works. utility services  Local people must be informed through appropriate means about the time of shifting of utility structures and potential disruption of services if any.

238 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 1. Air Quality 1.1 Dust generation  Transport, loading and unloading of loose and MORT&H  Throughout the project  PM10 level Standards Included in Contractor MPRDC due to construction fine materials through covered vehicles. Specification corridor. measurement, CPCB project cost /CSC activities & transport,  Paved approach roads. s for Road  Dust pollution methods of storage and handling and Bridge observation  Storage areas to be located downwind of the or complain of of construction works, Air s, habitation area. locals materials (P & CP) Act Public  Water spraying on earthworks, unpaved 1974 and consultation haulage roads and other dust prone areas. Central  Provision of PPEs to workers. Motor and Vehicle Act 1988 1.2 Emission of air  Regular maintenance of machinery and The Air  Asphalt mixing plants,  Monitoring of Standards Included in Contractor MPRDC pollutants (HC, SO2, equipment. (P & CP) crushers, DG sets locations ambient air CPCB project cost /CSC NOX, CO etc) from  Batching, asphalt mixing plants and crushers Act,1981 quality & methods (Amended19 vehicles due to at downwind (1km) direction from the nearest checking PUC 87) and traffic congestion & settlement. certificates use of equipment Rules1982  Only crushers licensed by the PCB shall be and machinery used.

 DG sets with stacks of adequate height and use of low sulphur diesel as fuel.  Ambient air quality monitoring.

Appendix 8 239

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 2. Noise 2.1 Noise from  All equipment to be timely serviced and Legal  Throughout project section  Noise levels As per Included in Contractor MPRDC Construction vehicle, properly maintained. requirement especially at construction measurements Noise rule, project cost /CSC equipment and  Construction equipment and machinery to sites, residential and  Complaints 2000 Plantation Noise cost is machinery. be fitted with silencers and maintained identified sensitive locations. from local Consultation Pollution separate properly.  Noise barriers have been people with local (Regulation proposed in total 1920m people  Only IS approved equipment shall be used and Control) length as noise preventive for construction activities. Rules, 2000  Timing of noisy construction activities shall and measures. be done during night time and weekends near amendments schools and selected suitable times near Thereof + temples when there are no visitors, Clause No concurrent noisy operations may be 501.8.6. separated to reduce the total noise generated, MORT&H and if possible re-route traffic during Specification construction to avoid the accumulation of s for noise beyond standards. Else provision of Road and temporary noise barrier at sensitive locations Bridge or near sources. works  Time regulation near residential, built up and forest areas construction shall be restricted to daylight hours.  Initiation of multi layered plantation, to serve as mitigation option for operation phase.  Provision of Noise barriers at sensitive locations  Noise monitoring as per EMoP. 3. Land and Soil 3.1 Land use  Non-agricultural areas to be used as borrow Project  Throughout the project  Borrow pit Review Included in Contractor MPRDC Change and Loss of areas to the extent possible. requirement section and Locations Top borrow area construction /CSC productive/top soil  If using agricultural land, top soil to be  Borrow areas are located soil storage plan, site cost preserved and laid over either on the Km 4.75, Km 8.0, Km 9.25 & area visits embankment slope for growing vegetation to Km 40.25 protect soil erosion.

240 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 3. Land and Soil 3.2 Slope failure  Bio-turfing of embankments to protect slopes. IRC-56 for  Throughout the entire  Occurrence of Review of Included in Design MPRDC and soil erosion due  Slope protection by providing dry stone treatment of project road especially slope failure or design Construction consultant and /CSC to construction pitching, masonry retaining walls, planting of embankment along hilly areas erosion issues documents cost Contractor, slopes for activities, earthwork, grass and trees. and site and cut and fill, erosion control, observation  The side slopes of all cut and fill areas will be stockpiles etc. Clause No. graded and covered with stone pitching, 306 and grass and shrub as per design specifications. 305.2.2  Care should be taken that the slope gradient MORT&H shall not be greater than 2:1. Specifications for Road and Bridge works, Guidelines IX for Soil erosion 3.3 Borrow site  Non-productive, barren lands, upland shall be IRC-10 for  Borrow areas are located  Existence of Review of Included in Design MPRDC locations used for borrowing earth with the necessary guidelines on Km 4.75, Km 8.0, Km borrow areas design Construction consultant and /CSC permissions/consents. borrow areas 9.25 & Km 40.25. in document s cost Contractor,  Depths of borrow pits to be regulated and and for  These are located away inappropriate and site sides not steeper than 25%. quarries, from habitation areas & unauthorized observation Environmental  Topsoil to be stockpiled and protected for use mainly are non-productive locations. Protection Act at the rehabilitation stage. barren lands.  Poor borrow and area  Transportation of earth materials through Rules, 1986; covered vehicles. management Water Act, Air practices.  To the extent borrow areas shall be sited Act, Clause No.  Incidents of away from habitation areas. Borrow areas 305.2.2 accidents. shall be levelled with salvaged material or MORT&H other filling materials which do not pose Specifications  Complaints contamination of soil. for Road and from local Bridge works people. Guidelines V for Borrow Areas management 3.4 Quarry operations  Aggregates will be sourced from existing Clause 111.3  Quarry area locations  Existence of Review of Included in Contractor MPRDC licensed quarries. MORT&H licenses for all design Construction /CSC  Copies of consent/ approval / rehabilitation Specifications quarry areas document s, cost plan for a new quarry or use of existing source for Road and from which contractor will be submitted to EO, MPRDC. Bridge works, materials are document s Guidelines VI and site  The contractor will develop a Quarry being sourced for quarry area observation Redevelopment plan, as per the Mining Rules  Complaints management of the state and submit a copy of the from local approval to EA. people.

Appendix 8 241

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 3. Land and Soil 3.5 Compaction of  Construction vehicles, machinery and Design  Parking areas,  Location of Site Included in Contractor MPRDC soil and impact on equipment to be stationed in the designated requirement  Haulage roads and approach and observation construction /CSC quarry haul roads ROW to avoid compaction. construction yards. haulage roads cost due to movement of  Approach roads/haulage roads shall be  Presence of vehicles and designed along the barren and hard soil area destroyed equipment to reduce the compaction. /compacted  Transportation of quarry material to the agricultural dumping site through heavy vehicles shall be land or land done through existing major roads to the which has not extent possible to restrict wear and tear to the be restored to village/minor roads. its original  Land taken for construction camp and other condition temporary facility shall be restored to its original conditions. 3.6 Contamination  Construction vehicles and equipment will Design  Fuelling station,  Quality of soil Site Included in Contractor MPRDC of soil due to leakage be maintained and refuelled in such a fashion requirement construction sites, near storage observation Construction /CSC /spillage of oil, that oil/diesel spillage does not contaminate and construction camps area cost. bituminous and non- the soil. and disposal location.  Presence of bituminous debris  Fuel storage and refuelling sites to be kept spilled oil or generated from away from drainage channels. bitumen in demolition and road  Unusable debris shall be dumped in ditches project area construction and low lying areas.  To avoid soil contamination Oil-Interceptors shall be provided at wash down and refuelling areas.  Waste oil and oil soaked cotton/ cloth shall be stored in containers labelled ‘Waste Oil’ and ‘Hazardous’ sold off to MoEF/SPCB authorized vendors.  Non-bituminous wastes to be dumped in borrow pits with the concurrence of landowner and covered with a layer of topsoil conserved from opening the pit.  Bituminous wastes will be disposed off in an identified dumping site approved by the State Pollution Control Board. 4. WaterResources 4.1 Sourcing of water  Requisite permission shall be obtained for -  Throughout the project  Approval from checking of Included in Contractor MPRDC during construction abstraction of groundwater from Central section competent documentati construction /CSC Groundwater Authority. authority, on on Talk to cost  Arrangements shall be made by contractor  complaints local people that the water availability and supply to from local nearby communities remain unaffected. people on water availability

242 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 4. WaterResources 4.2 Disposal of  Provisions shall be made to connect road Clause  Throughout the Project  Design of road Standards Included in Contractor MPRDC water during side drains with exiting nearby ponds No.1010 section side drains methods Site construction /CSC construction otherwise make provision of water harvesting EP Act 1986  Existence of observation cost pits intermittently. MORT&H proper and review Specifications drainage of for Road and system for documents Bridge disposal of works waste water 4.3 Alteration in  Existing drainage system to be maintained Design  Near all drainage  Design of road Review of Included in Contractor MPRDC surface water and further enhanced. requirement, channels, river crossings side drains Design construction /CSC hydrology due to  Provision shall be made for adequate size and Clause No etc. documents cost embankment number of cross drainage structures esp. in 501.8.6. Site the areas where land is sloping towards road MORT&H observation alignment. Specifications for  Road level shall be raised above HFL level Road and wherever road level is lesser than HFL. Bridge 4.4 Siltation in  Embankment slopes to be modified suitably to Design  Near all water bodies,  Siltation of Field Included in Contractor MPRDC water bodies due to restrict the soil debris entering water bodies. requirement, river embankment slopes. rivers, streams, observation construction /CSC construction  Provision of Silt fencing shall be made at Clause No ponds and cost activities/ earthwork water bodies. 501.8.6. other water MORT&H  Silt/sediment should be collected and bodies in Specifications stockpiled for possible reuse as surfacing of project area for Road and slopes where they have to be re-vegetated. Bridge works 4.5 Deterioration in  No vehicles or equipment should be parked or The Water  Water bodies, Refuelling  Water quality Conduction Included in Contractor MPRDC Surface water quality refuelled near water-bodies, so as to avoid (Prevention and stations, construction of ponds, of water construction /CSC due to leakage from contamination from fuel and lubricants. Control of camps. streams, rivers quality tests cost vehicles and  Oil and grease traps and fuelling platforms to Pollution) Act, and other as per the equipment’s and be provided at re-fuelling locations. 1974 and water bodies in monitoring waste from amendments plan Field  All chemicals and oil shall be stored away project area, construction camps. thereof. observation from water and concreted platform with catch  Presence of oil pit for spills collection. floating in  All equipment operators, drivers, and water bodies in warehouse personnel will be trained in project area immediate response for spill containment and eventual clean-up.  Construction camp to be sited away from water bodies.  Wastes must be collected, stored and taken to approve disposal site only.  Water quality shall be monitored periodically

Appendix 8 243

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 5. Flora and Fauna 5.1 Vegetation  Minimize tree cutting to the extent possible. Forest  Throughout the project  ROW width, Review of Road side Relevant MPRDC loss due to site  Roadside trees to be removed with prior Conservation corridor  Number of Relevant plantation agency /CSC preparation and approval of competent authority. Act 1980, trees for felling documents– cost is specialized in construction activities IRC SP: 21 and tree cutting included in afforestation  Compensatory plantation at 1:10 basis and  Compensatory and IRC SP:66 permit, project costs. additional plantation as per the IRC guidelines plantation plan compensato in consultation with Forest Department.  Number of ry plantation  Regular maintenance of all trees planted. trees replanted plan ,  Provision of LPG in construction camp as fuel Field source to avoid tree cutting, wherever observation possible. s  Plantation of trees on both sides of the road. Integrate vegetation management (IVM).  In the event of design changes during the construction stages additional assessments including the possibility to save trees shall be made by the EA.  Road side Plantation Strategy as per IRC specifications including maturing. 6. ConstructionCamps 6.1 Impact  All camps should maintain minimum Design  All construction camps  Location of On site Included in Contractor and MPRDC associated with distance from following: Requirement camp sites and Observation construction EO /CSC location # 500 m from habitation, distance from , Interaction cost # 500 m from forest areas where possible, habitation/fores with workers # 500 m from water bodies where possible, t /water bodies and local # 500 m from through traffic route where community possible. 6.2 Worker’s Health  The location, layout and basic facility The building  All construction camps  Camp health Camp Part of the Contractor MPRDC in construction camp provision of each labour camp will be and other records, records, Contractors /CSC submitted to SQC prior to their construction. construction  Existence of Site costs The construction shall commence only after workers proper first aid observation, approval of SQC. (Regulation of kit in camp site Consultation Employment with local  The contractor will maintain necessary living  Complaints and Conditions people living accommodation and ancillary facilities in from local of Service) Act nearby functional and hygienic manner as approved people by the EA. 1996 and The Water  Adequate water and sanitary latrines with (Prevention septic tanks attached to soak pits shall be and Control of provided. Pollution) Act,  Preventive medical care to be provided to 1974 and workers including a First-Aid kit that must be amendments available in the camp. thereof  Waste disposal facilities such as dust bins must be provided in the camps and regular disposal of waste must be carried out.

244 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision  The Contractor will take all precautions to protect the workers from insect and pest to reduce the risk to health. This includes the use of insecticides which should comply with local regulations.  No alcoholic liquor or prohibited drugs will be imported to, sell, give, and barter to the workers of host community.  Awareness raising to immigrant Workers /local community on communicable and sexually transmitted diseases. 7. Management of Construction Waste/Debris 7.1 Selection of  Unproductive/waste lands shall be selected Design  At all dumping sites  Location of Field survey Included in Contractor MPRDC Dumping Sites for dumping sites away from residential areas Requirement dumping sites, & interaction Construction /CSC and water bodies. and MORT&H  Public with local cost.  Dumping sites have adequate capacity equal guidelines complaints people to the amount of debris generated.  Public perception and consent from the village Panchayats has to be obtained before finalizing the location.

Appendix 8 245

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 8. TrafficManagementandSafety 8.1 Management of  Temporary traffic diversion shall be planned Design  Throughout the project  Traffic Review Included in Contractor MPRDC existing traffic and by the contractor and approved by the requirement corridor especially at management traffic construction /CSC safety Engineer’. and IRC SP:55 intersections. plan Safety management cost.  The traffic control plans shall contain details signs on site, plan Field of diversions; traffic safety arrangements  Number of observation of during construction; safety measures for traffic traffic night time traffic and precautions for accidents management transportation of hazardous materials. Traffic and safety control plans shall be prepared in line with system requirements of IRC- SP-55. Interaction with people in  The Contractor will ensure that the diversion vehicles using is always maintained in running condition, the road particularly during the monsoon to avoid disruption to traffic flow.  On stretches where it is not possible to pass the traffic on the part width of existing carriageway, temporary paved diversions will be constructed.  Restriction of construction activity to only one side of the existing road.  The contractor shall inform local community of changes to traffic routes, and pedestrian access arrangements with assistance from “Engineer”.  Use of adequate signage’s to ensure traffic management and safety.  Conduct of regular safety audit on safety measures.

8.2 Pedestrians,  Temporary access and diversion, with proper Design  Near habitation on both  Road signage Field Included in Contractor MPRDC animal movement drainage facilities. requirement, sides of schools, temples, & drainage as Observation, construction /CSC  Access to the schools, temples and other IRC-SP-27 for hospitals, graveyards, per IRC Interaction cost. public places must be maintained when recommendatio construction sites, guideline, with local construction takes place near them. ns of IRC haulage roads, diversion  Complaints people regional  Fencing wherever cattle movement is sites. from local workshops expected. people on Highway  To avoid the need for cattle underpasses, Safety, IRC- some of the proposed culverts near SP-32 for road habitations may be widened to facilitate cattle Safety for movement. Children, IRC- SP-44 for highway Safety, IRC- SP-55 for safety in road construction zone Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to Location Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility

246 Appendix 8

Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 8.3 Safety of  Contractors to adopt and maintain safe  Construction sites  Availability of Site Included in Obligation of MPRDC Workers and working practices. safety gears to Observation, construction Contractor /CSC accident risk from  Usage of fluorescent and retro-reflectory workers, Review cost construction signage, in local language at the construction  Safety signage, records on activities safety training sites  Training records and accidents,  Training to workers on safety procedures and on safety, Interact with precautions.  Number of construction  Mandatory appointment of safety officer. safety related workers  All regulations regarding safe scaffolding, accidents ladders, working platforms, gangway, stairwells, excavations, trenches and safe means of entry and egress shall be complied With.  Provision of PPEs to workers.  Provision of a readily available first aid unit including an adequate supply of dressing materials.  The contractor will not employ any person below the age of 18 years for any work.  Use of hazardous material should be minimized and/or restricted.  Emergency plan (to be approved by engineer) shall be prepared to respond to any accidents or emergencies.  Accident Prevention Officer must be appointed by the contractor. 8.4 Accident risk to  Restrict access to construction sites to  Construction sites  Safety signs and Site Included in Contractor MPRDC local community authorized personnel. their location, inspection, construction /CSC  Physical separation must be provided for  Incidents of Consultation cost movement of vehicular and human traffic. accidents, with local people  Adequate signage must be provided for safe  Complaints from traffic movement. local people 9. Site restoration and rehabilitation 9.1 Clean-up  Contractor will prepare site restoration plans, Project  Throughout the project  Clean and Site Included in Contractor MPRDC Operations, which will be approved by the ‘Engineer’. requirement corridor, construction restored camp observation, construction /CSC Restoration and  The clean-up and restoration operations are camp sites and borrow sites presence Interaction cost . Rehabilitation to be implemented by the contractor prior to areas /absence of with locals, demobilization. construction Issue completion  All construction zones including river-beds, material/ debris certificate culverts, road-side areas, camps, hot mix after completion after plant sites, crushers, batching plant sites and of construction restoration of any other area used/affected by the project works on all sites are will be left clean and tidy, at the contractor's construction site found expense, to the satisfaction of the satisfactory Environmental officer.  All the opened borrow areas will be rehabilitated and ‘Engineer’ will certify in this regard.

Appendix 8 247

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision C. Operation stage 1. Air quality 1.1 Air pollution  Roadside tree plantations shall be maintained. Environmental  Throughout the corridor  Ambient air As per Included in MPRDC /CSC due to due to  Regular maintenance of the road will be Protection Act, quality (PM10, CPCB Operation/ vehicular movement done to ensure good surface condition 1986; The Air CO, NOx) requirement Maintenance (Prevention and s, site cost  Vehicular air pollution will be managed  Survival rate of Control of inspection and monitored. trees planted Pollution) Act,  Ambient air quality monitoring. If monitored 1981 parameters are above the prescribed limit, suitable control measures must be taken.  Technological and behavioural changes.  Road signs shall be provided reminding the motorist to properly maintain their vehicles to economize on fuel consumption and protect the environment. 2. Noise

3. Land and Soil 3.1 Soil erosion at  Periodic checking to be carried to assess the Project  At bridge locations &  Existence of soil On site Included in MPRDC /CSC Embankment during effectiveness of the stabilization measures requirement embankment slopes and erosion sites observation Operation/ heavy rain fall. viz. turning, stone pitching, river training other probable soil  Number of soil Maintenance structures etc. erosion areas. erosion sites cost  Necessary measures to be followed wherever there are failures.

248 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementati Supervision C. Operation stage on 4. Water resources/Flooding and Inundation 4.1 Siltation  Regular checks shall be made for soil erosion Project  Near surface water  Water quality Site Included in MPRDC /CSC and turning conditions of river training requirement bodies observation Operation/ structures for its effective maintenance. Maintenance cost 4.2 Water logging  Regular visual checks and cleaning of drains Project  Near surface water  Presence of Site Included in MPRDC /CSC due to blockage shall be done along the alignment to ensure requirement bodies flooded areas observation Operation/ of drains, culverts or that flow of water is maintained through cross or areas with Maintenance streams drains and other channels /streams. water stagnation e cost  Monitoring of water borne diseases due to stagnant water bodies.

4.3 Road inundation  MPRDC will ensure that all drains (side Project  Near surface water  Incidents of Field Included in MPRDC /CSC due to choking of drains and all cross drainages) are requirement bodies flooding & road observation, Operation/ drainage channels periodically cleared especially before inundation with Interaction Maintenance monsoon season to facilitate the quick details with local cost passage of rainwater and avoid flooding. community

5. Flora 5.1 Vegetation  Planted trees, shrubs, and grasses to be Forest  Project tree plantation  Minimum of Records and Operation MPRDC /CSC properly maintained. Conservation sites 70% of tree fields and  The tree survivalist audit to be conducted at Act 1980 survival observations Maintenance least once in a year to assess the Cost effectiveness. 6. Maintenance of Right of Way and Safety 6.1 Accident Risk  Efforts shall be made to make shoulder Project  Throughout the project  Presence of and Visual Included in MPRDC /CSC due to uncontrolled completely clear of vegetation. requirement route extent of Inspection, operation/ growth of vegetation  Regular maintenance of plantation along the vegetation Accident Maintenance roadside. growth on either records cost  Invasive plant not to be planted near the road. side of road Accident data 6.2 Accident risks  Traffic control measures, including speed IRC:SP:55  Throughout the project  Police records Review Included in MPRDC /CSC associated with traffic limits, will be enforced strictly. route on accident accident operation/ movement.  Further encroachment of squatters within the condition and records, Maintenance ROW will be prevented. existence of Site cost observation  No school or hospital will be allowed to be safety signs, s established beyond the stipulated planning rumble strips line as per relevant local law etc. on the road  Monitor/ensure that all safety provisions  Presence/ included in design and construction phase are absence of properly maintained sensitive receptor  Highway patrol unit(s) for round the clock structures inside patrolling. Phone booths for accidental the stipulated reporting and ambulance services with planning line as minimum response time for rescue of any per relevant accident victims, if possible. local law

Appendix 8 249

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision C. Operation stage 6.3 Transport of  Existence of spill prevention and control and  Throughout the project  Status of Review of Included in MPRDC /CSC dangerous goods emergency responsive system. stretch emergency spill Operation/  Emergency plan for vehicles carrying system–whether prevention Maintenance hazardous material. operational or and cost. not emergency response system Spill

Note EA: Executing Agency , MPRDC: Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation, EO: Environmental Officer, IRC: Indian Road Congress

g. The“Projectengineer”or “theengineer”istheteamof ConstructionSupervisionConsultants(CSC)responsiblefor approvingtheplans, engineeringdrawing,releaseofpaymentstocontractoretc.onbehalfoftheemployer(MPRDC).ItisusuallytheteamleaderoftheCSCthat takestheresponsibilityofsigningapprovaldocumentson behalfof theCSCteam. h. The “environmental officer” is the environmental specialist under the CSC who is responsible for providing recommendations to the CSC team leader for approving activities specific to environment safeguards on behalf of “the engineer”.

250 Appendix 8

Environmental Monitoring Plan (Contract Package No. 19) Environmental Monitoring Institutional Responsibility Location Frequency Components Parameters Special Guidance Standards Implementation Supervision

Note Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation, PIU- Project Implementation Unit, CSC- Construction Supervision Consultant

Appendix 8 251

SL. NO ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT RATE (Rs.) AMOUNT (Rs.) RESPONSIBILITY

A Forest Clearance and Compensatory Afforestation

Compensatory afforestation and avenue PIU through Forest A.1 plantation @1:10 trees including 3 year 1970 No. 1000 1970000 Department maintainance

B Environmental Monitoring

Ambient air quality monitoring during construction and operations phases (3 times in a B.1 year for 3 years or construction period 3 sites & 42 No. 9000 378000 Five years during operation/defect liability period, once in a year at three sites)

Ambient noise level monitoring during construction and operations phases (3 times in a B.2 year for 3 years or construction period 3 sites & 42 No. 3000 126000 Five years during operation/defect liability period, once in a year at three sites)

PIU through Approved Water quality monitoring of surface water during monitoring Agency construction and operations phases (3 times in a B.3 27 No. 5000 135000 year for 3 years or construction period at 3 location sites)

Water quality monitoring of drinking water during construction and operations phases (3 times in a B.4 27 No. 5000 135000 year for 3 years or construction period at 3 location sites)

Soil quality monitoring during construction and B.5 operations phases (3 times in a year for 3 years 27 No. 10000 270000 or construction period at 3 location sites)

C Noise Barrier at Sensitive Location

Provide the Noise barrier at sensitive areas like schools and temples.The noise barriers of hollow Contractor through C.1 brick wall/reinforced concrete panels with height 1920 Rm 2000 3840000 BOQ of 3.5m. The design of the noise barrier shall be approved by the engineer in charge.

D Solid Waste Management

Solid Waste Management during entire project D.1 36 No. 3000/; month 108000 period

E Dust Suppression

Dust Suppression along the entire project length 2000/- per day E.1 720 No. 1440000 three tankers in a days for 240 Days per tanker F Environmental Training

PIU through Training at site : Three training sessions during 50000 per F.1 3 per sessions 150000 Supervision construction period session Consultant TOTAL COST = 8552000

252 Appendix 8

Appendix 8e: Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan (Contract Package No. 20)

Environmental Management Plan (Contract Package No. 20)

This EMP is applicable to three subproject road included in Civil Works Contract Package No 20 i.e. 1) Anooppur-Jaitpur Road, 2) Gohparu-Rashmohni-Budhar (via Badhiya) Road and 3) Pasgarhi-Deori-Janakpur Road Institutional Responsibility EnvironmentalIssue Referenceto Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation RemedialMeasure Location / Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision

Appendix 8 253

1.4 Safety along  Provision of retro-reflective warning sign Design  218 numbers of different  No. of accident Field Included in Design MPRDC the proposed boards nears school, hospital, religious requirement, types of sign boards & Vehicle observation, construction Consultant /CSC alignment places, and other areas, speed restriction sign IRC-67 for proposed in AJ road, 211 collisions interview of cost in built-ups, forests areas etc. road signs, numbers in GRB road & 169 locals IRC-73 for  Improving substandard curves, grading & numbers in PDJ road as geometric other geometric features as per IRC traffic safety measures. design Standards Substandard curves have standards,   Provision of metal beam crash barriers/guard IRC-119 for been improved at Km stones at high embankment locations. traffic safety, 5+550,33+350 & 35+600 in  Provision of slope stabilization measures in IRC-75 for AJ road and at Km 6+250, high embankment/cutting to prevent any land slope 11+050 & 28+450 in GRB slide situation. stabilisation road and at Km 1+850, in high 2+450, 11+800, 15+840, embankment 16+750 & 19+050 in PDJ road.  Length of W-beam crash barriers (where height of embankment is more than 3.0 m) provided in AJ road is 2000 m (bothside), 1600 m (bothside) in GRB and 1680 m (bothside) in PDJ road

A. Pre-construction and Design Stage 2. Natural Hazards 2.1 Protection for  Design considering relevant IRC guidelines IRC-6 for  Throughout the stretch  Incorporation Review of Project Design MPRDC damage from for earthquakes in bridges. structure of IRC bridge preparation Consultant /CSC Earthquake design, guidelines for design Cost IS-1893 for earthquake in earthquake bridge design resistant design

2.2 Protection of  Raise embankment height above the HFL IRC-34 for road  Sub-grade top has been  Design of Included in Design MPRDC road embankment in levels in the flood prone areas. construction in kept 0.6m above HFL embankment/ construction Consultant /CSC Flood prone Areas  Improvement in existing culverts/ Bridges to water logged throughout the stretch and road profile, cost areas and increase their carrying capacity. profile has been raised at  Design of both

water logged areas. cross & side  Provision of adequate balancing culverts. IRC-75 for design  20 structures (1 major drains, of high bridge, 1 minor bridge, 17 embankment  No. of CD HPC & 1 VCW) are structures & proposed to be their spans reconstructed in AJ road, 13 structures (1 minor bridge, 6 HPC, 3 slab culverts & 3 VCW) in GRB road, 11 structures (11 HPC) in PDJ road. 3. Shifting of utility structures

254 Appendix 8

3.1 Disruption of  All telephone and electrical poles/wires and Project  The contractor will shift all  Utility shifting Interaction Included in Contractor/ MPRDC utility services to underground cables should be shifted requirement utility structure throughout plan with Construction SQC /CSC local community before start of construction. the corridor with  Complaints concerned cost  Necessary permission and payments should permission from relevant from local utility be made to relevant utility service agencies authorities before people authorities and local to allow quick shifting and restoration of commencement of physical  Status of local public utility services. works. utility services  Local people must be informed through appropriate means about the time of shifting of utility structures and potential disruption of services if any. B. Construction Stage 1. Air Quality 1.1 Dust generation  Transport, loading and unloading of loose MORT&H  Throughout the project  PM10 level Standards Included in Contractor MPRDC due to construction and fine materials through covered vehicles. Specifications corridor. measurement, CPCB project cost /CSC activities & transport,  Paved approach roads. for Road and  Dust pollution methods of storage and handling Bridge works, observation  Storage areas to be located downwind of or complain of of construction Air (P & CP) s, the habitation area. locals materials Act 1974 and Public  Water spraying on earthworks, unpaved Central Motor consultation haulage roads and other dust prone areas. and Vehicle Act  Provision of PPEs to workers. 1988

1.2 Emission of air  Regular maintenance of machinery and The Air  Asphalt mixing plants,  Monitoring of Standards Included in Contractor MPRDC pollutants (HC, SO2, equipment. (P & CP) crushers, DG sets locations ambient air CPCB project cost /CSC NOX, CO etc) from  Batching, asphalt mixing plants and Act,1981 quality & methods (Amended1987 vehicles due to crushers at downwind (1km) direction from checking PUC ) and traffic congestion & the nearest settlement. certificates use of equipment Rules1982  Only crushers licensed by the PCB shall and machinery be used.

 DG sets with stacks of adequate height and use of low sulphur diesel as fuel.  Ambient air quality monitoring.

Appendix 8 255

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 2. Noise 2.1 Noise from  All equipment to be timely serviced and Legal  Throughout project section  Noise levels As per Included in Contractor MPRDC Construction vehicle, properly maintained. requirement especially at construction measurements Noise rule, project cost /CSC equipment and  Construction equipment and machinery to sites, residential and  Complaints 2000 Plantation Noise cost is machinery. be fitted with silencers and maintained identified sensitive locations. from local Consultation Pollution separate properly.  Noise barriers has been people with local (Regulation proposed in total 1710m people  Only IS approved equipment shall be used and Control) length (800m in GRB and for construction activities. Rules, 2000  Timing of noisy construction activities shall and 910m in PDJ road) be done during night time and weekends near amendments schools and selected suitable times near Thereof + temples when there are no visitors, Clause No concurrent noisy operations may be 501.8.6. separated to reduce the total noise generated, MORT&H and if possible re-route traffic during Specification construction to avoid the accumulation of s for noise beyond standards. Else provision of Road and temporary noise barrier at sensitive locations Bridge or near sources. works  Time regulation near residential, built up and forest areas construction shall be restricted to daylight hours.  Initiation of multi layered plantation, to serve as mitigation option for operation phase.  Provision of Noise barriers at sensitive locations  Noise monitoring as per EMoP. 3. Land and Soil 3.1 Land use  Non-agricultural areas to be used as borrow Project  Throughout the project  Borrow pit Review Included in Contractor MPRDC Change and Loss of areas to the extent possible. requirement section and Locations Top borrow area construction /CSC productive/top soil  If using agricultural land, top soil to be  Borrow areas (Km 3.8, Km soil storage plan, site cost preserved and laid over either on the 12 & Km 33 of AJ road , Km area visits embankment slope for growing vegetation to 4, Km 14& Km 30.8 of GRB protect soil erosion. road and Km 1.0, Km 5.0 & Km 12 of PDJ road)

256 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 3. Land and Soil 3.2 Slope failure  Bio-turfing of embankments to protect slopes. IRC-56 for treatment  Throughout the  Occurrence of Review of Included in Design MPRDC and soil erosion due  Slope protection by providing dry stone of embankment entire project road slope failure or design Construction consultant and /CSC to construction pitching, masonry retaining walls, planting of slopes for erosion especially along erosion issues documents cost Contractor, control, activities, earthwork, grass and trees. hilly areas and site and cut and fill, Clause No. observation  The side slopes of all cut and fill areas will be stockpiles etc. 306 and 305.2.2 graded and covered with stone pitching, MORT&H grass and shrub as per design specifications. Specifications for  Care should be taken that the slope gradient Road and Bridge shall not be greater than 2:1. works, Guidelines IX for Soil erosion 3.3 Borrow site  Non-productive, barren lands, upland shall be IRC-10 for guidelines  Borrow areas (Km  Existence of Review of Included in Design MPRDC locations used for borrowing earth with the necessary on 3.8, Km 12 & Km borrow areas design Construction consultant and /CSC permissions/consents. borrow areas and for 33 of AJ road , Km in document s cost Contractor,  Depths of borrow pits to be regulated and quarries, 4, Km 14& Km 30.8 inappropriate and site sides not steeper than 25%. Environmental of GRB road and unauthorized observation Protection Act and  Topsoil to be stockpiled and protected for use Km 1.0, Km 5.0 & locations. Rules, 1986; at the rehabilitation stage. Km 12 of PDJ  Poor borrow Water Act, Air Act, road). area  Transportation of earth materials through Clause No. covered vehicles.  These are located management 305.2.2 MORT&H away from practices.  To the extent borrow areas shall be sited Specifications for habitation areas & away from habitation areas. Borrow areas  Incidents of Road and Bridge mainly are non- shall be levelled with salvaged material or accidents. works Guidelines V productive barren other filling materials which do not pose  Complaints for Borrow Areas lands. contamination of soil. management from local people. 3.4 Quarry operations  Aggregates will be sourced from existing Clause 111.3  Quarry area  Existence of Review of Included in Contractor MPRDC licensed quarries. MORT&H locations licenses for all design Construction /CSC  Copies of consent/ approval / rehabilitation Specifications for quarry areas document s, cost plan for a new quarry or use of existing source Road and Bridge from which contractor will be submitted to EO, MPRDC. works, materials are document s Guidelines VI for and site  The contractor will develop a Quarry being sourced quarry area observation Redevelopment plan, as per the Mining Rules  Complaints management of the state and submit a copy of the from local approval to EA. people.

Appendix 8 257

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 3. Land and Soil 3.5 Compaction of  Construction vehicles, machinery and Design  Parking areas,  Location of Site Included in Contractor MPRDC soil and impact on equipment to be stationed in the designated requirement  Haulage roads and approach and observation construction /CSC quarry haul roads ROW to avoid compaction. construction yards. haulage roads cost due to movement of  Approach roads/haulage roads shall be  Presence of vehicles and designed along the barren and hard soil area destroyed equipment to reduce the compaction. /compacted  Transportation of quarry material to the agricultural dumping site through heavy vehicles shall be land or land done through existing major roads to the which has not extent possible to restrict wear and tear to the be restored to village/minor roads. its original  Land taken for construction camp and other condition temporary facility shall be restored to its original conditions. 3.6 Contamination  Construction vehicles and equipment will Design  Fuelling station,  Quality of soil Site Included in Contractor MPRDC of soil due to leakage be maintained and refuelled in such a fashion requirement construction sites, near storage observation Construction /CSC /spillage of oil, that oil/diesel spillage does not contaminate and construction camps area cost. bituminous and non- the soil. and disposal location.  Presence of bituminous debris  Fuel storage and refuelling sites to be kept spilled oil or generated from away from drainage channels. bitumen in demolition and road  Unusable debris shall be dumped in ditches project area construction and low lying areas.  To avoid soil contamination Oil-Interceptors shall be provided at wash down and refuelling areas.  Waste oil and oil soaked cotton/ cloth shall be stored in containers labelled ‘Waste Oil’ and ‘Hazardous’ sold off to MoEF/SPCB authorized vendors.  Non-bituminous wastes to be dumped in borrow pits with the concurrence of landowner and covered with a layer of topsoil conserved from opening the pit.  Bituminous wastes will be disposed off in an identified dumping site approved by the State Pollution Control Board. 4. WaterResources 4.1 Sourcing of water  Requisite permission shall be obtained for -  Throughout the project  Approval from checking of Included in Contractor MPRDC during construction abstraction of groundwater from Central section competent documentati construction /CSC Groundwater Authority. authority, on on Talk to cost  Arrangements shall be made by contractor  complaints local people that the water availability and supply to from local nearby communities remain unaffected. people on water availability

258 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 4. WaterResources 4.2 Disposal of  Provisions shall be made to connect road Clause  Throughout the Project  Design of road Standards Included in Contractor MPRDC water during side drains with exiting nearby ponds No.1010 section side drains methods Site construction /CSC construction otherwise make provision of water harvesting EP Act 1986  Existence of observation cost pits intermittently. MORT&H proper and review Specifications drainage of for Road and system for documents Bridge disposal of works waste water 4.3 Alteration in  Existing drainage system to be maintained Design  Near all drainage  Design of road Review of Included in Contractor MPRDC surface water and further enhanced. requirement, channels, river crossings side drains Design construction /CSC hydrology due to  Provision shall be made for adequate size and Clause No etc. documents cost embankment number of cross drainage structures esp. in 501.8.6. Site the areas where land is sloping towards road MORT&H observation alignment. Specifications for  Road level shall be raised above HFL level Road and wherever road level is lesser than HFL. Bridge 4.4 Siltation in  Embankment slopes to be modified suitably to Design  Near all water bodies,  Siltation of Field Included in Contractor MPRDC water bodies due to restrict the soil debris entering water bodies. requirement, river embankment slopes. rivers, streams, observation construction /CSC construction  Provision of Silt fencing shall be made at Clause No ponds and cost activities/ earthwork water bodies. 501.8.6. other water MORT&H  Silt/sediment should be collected and bodies in Specifications stockpiled for possible reuse as surfacing of project area for Road and slopes where they have to be re-vegetated. Bridge works 4.5 Deterioration in  No vehicles or equipment should be parked or The Water  Water bodies, Refuelling  Water quality Conduction Included in Contractor MPRDC Surface water quality refuelled near water-bodies, so as to avoid (Prevention and stations, construction of ponds, of water construction /CSC due to leakage from contamination from fuel and lubricants. Control of camps. streams, rivers quality tests cost vehicles and  Oil and grease traps and fuelling platforms to Pollution) Act, and other as per the equipment’s and be provided at re-fuelling locations. 1974 and water bodies in monitoring waste from amendments plan Field  All chemicals and oil shall be stored away project area, construction camps. thereof. observation from water and concreted platform with catch  Presence of oil pit for spills collection. floating in  All equipment operators, drivers, and water bodies in warehouse personnel will be trained in project area immediate response for spill containment and eventual clean-up.  Construction camp to be sited away from water bodies.  Wastes must be collected, stored and taken to approve disposal site only.  Water quality shall be monitored periodically

Appendix 8 259

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 5. Flora and Fauna 5.1 Vegetation  Minimize tree cutting to the extent possible. Forest  Throughout the project  ROW width, Review of Road side Relevant MPRDC loss due to site  Roadside trees to be removed with prior Conservation corridor  Number of Relevant plantation agency /CSC preparation and approval of competent authority. Act 1980, trees for felling documents– cost is specialized in construction activities IRC SP: 21 and tree cutting included in afforestation  Compensatory plantation at 1:10 basis and  Compensatory and IRC SP:66 permit, project costs. additional plantation as per the IRC guidelines plantation plan compensato in consultation with Forest Department.  Number of ry plantation  Regular maintenance of all trees planted. trees replanted plan ,  Provision of LPG in construction camp as fuel Field source to avoid tree cutting, wherever observation possible. s  Plantation of trees on both sides of the road. Integrate vegetation management (IVM).  In the event of design changes during the construction stages additional assessments including the possibility to save trees shall be made by the EA.  Road side Plantation Strategy as per IRC specifications including maturing. 6. ConstructionCamps 6.1 Impact  All camps should maintain minimum Design  All construction camps  Location of On site Included in Contractor and MPRDC associated with distance from following: Requirement camp sites and Observation construction EO /CSC location # 500 m from habitation, distance from , Interaction cost # 500 m from forest areas where possible, habitation/fores with workers # 500 m from water bodies where possible, t /water bodies and local # 500 m from through traffic route where community possible. 6.2 Worker’s Health  The location, layout and basic facility The building  All construction camps  Camp health Camp Part of the Contractor MPRDC in construction camp provision of each labour camp will be and other records, records, Contractors /CSC submitted to SQC prior to their construction. construction  Existence of Site costs The construction shall commence only after workers proper first aid observation, approval of SQC. (Regulation of kit in camp site Consultation Employment with local  The contractor will maintain necessary living  Complaints and Conditions people living accommodation and ancillary facilities in from local of Service) Act nearby functional and hygienic manner as approved people by the EA. 1996 and The Water  Adequate water and sanitary latrines with (Prevention septic tanks attached to soak pits shall be and Control of provided. Pollution) Act,  Preventive medical care to be provided to 1974 and workers including a First-Aid kit that must be amendments available in the camp. thereof  Waste disposal facilities such as dust bins must be provided in the camps and regular disposal of waste must be carried out.

260 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision  The Contractor will take all precautions to protect the workers from insect and pest to reduce the risk to health. This includes the use of insecticides which should comply with local regulations.  No alcoholic liquor or prohibited drugs will be imported to, sell, give, and barter to the workers of host community.  Awareness raising to immigrant Workers /local community on communicable and sexually transmitted diseases. 7. Management of Construction Waste/Debris 7.1 Selection of  Unproductive/waste lands shall be selected Design  At all dumping sites  Location of Field survey Included in Contractor MPRDC Dumping Sites for dumping sites away from residential areas Requirement dumping sites, & interaction Construction /CSC and water bodies. and MORT&H  Public with local cost.  Dumping sites have adequate capacity equal guidelines complaints people to the amount of debris generated.  Public perception and consent from the village Panchayats has to be obtained before finalizing the location.

Appendix 8 261

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 8. TrafficManagementandSafety 8.1 Management of  Temporary traffic diversion shall be planned Design  Throughout the project  Traffic Review Included in Contractor MPRDC existing traffic and by the contractor and approved by the requirement corridor especially at management traffic construction /CSC safety Engineer’. and IRC SP:55 intersections. plan Safety management cost.  The traffic control plans shall contain details signs on site, plan Field of diversions; traffic safety arrangements  Number of observation of during construction; safety measures for traffic traffic night time traffic and precautions for accidents management transportation of hazardous materials. Traffic and safety control plans shall be prepared in line with system requirements of IRC- SP-55. Interaction with people in  The Contractor will ensure that the diversion vehicles using is always maintained in running condition, the road particularly during the monsoon to avoid disruption to traffic flow.  On stretches where it is not possible to pass the traffic on the part width of existing carriageway, temporary paved diversions will be constructed.  Restriction of construction activity to only one side of the existing road.  The contractor shall inform local community of changes to traffic routes, and pedestrian access arrangements with assistance from “Engineer”.  Use of adequate signage’s to ensure traffic management and safety.  Conduct of regular safety audit on safety measures.

262 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision B. Construction Stage 8.3 Safety of  Contractors to adopt and maintain safe  Construction sites  Availability of Site Included in Obligation of MPRDC Workers and working practices. safety gears to Observation, construction Contractor /CSC accident risk from  Usage of fluorescent and retro-reflectory workers, Review cost construction signage, in local language at the construction  Safety signage, records on activities safety training sites  Training records and accidents,  Training to workers on safety procedures and on safety, Interact with precautions.  Number of construction  Mandatory appointment of safety officer. safety related workers  All regulations regarding safe scaffolding, accidents ladders, working platforms, gangway, stairwells, excavations, trenches and safe means of entry and egress shall be complied With.  Provision of PPEs to workers.  Provision of a readily available first aid unit including an adequate supply of dressing materials.  The contractor will not employ any person below the age of 18 years for any work.  Use of hazardous material should be minimized and/or restricted.  Emergency plan (to be approved by engineer) shall be prepared to respond to any accidents or emergencies.  Accident Prevention Officer must be appointed by the contractor. 8.4 Accident risk to  Restrict access to construction sites to  Construction sites  Safety signs and Site Included in Contractor MPRDC local community authorized personnel. their location, inspection, construction /CSC  Physical separation must be provided for  Incidents of Consultation cost movement of vehicular and human traffic. accidents, with local people  Adequate signage must be provided for safe  Complaints from traffic movement. local people 9. Site restoration and rehabilitation

Appendix 8 263

9.1 Clean-up  Contractor will prepare site restoration plans, Project  Throughout the project  Clean and Site Included in Contractor MPRDC Operations, which will be approved by the ‘Engineer’. requirement corridor, construction restored camp observation, construction /CSC Restoration and  The clean-up and restoration operations are camp sites and borrow sites presence Interaction cost . Rehabilitation to be implemented by the contractor prior to areas /absence of with locals, demobilization. construction Issue completion  All construction zones including river-beds, material/ debris certificate culverts, road-side areas, camps, hot mix after completion after plant sites, crushers, batching plant sites and of construction restoration of any other area used/affected by the project works on all sites are will be left clean and tidy, at the contractor's construction site found expense, to the satisfaction of the satisfactory Environmental officer.  All the opened borrow areas will be rehabilitated and ‘Engineer’ will certify in this regard.

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision C. Operation stage 1. Air quality 1.1 Air pollution  Roadside tree plantations shall be maintained. Environmental  Throughout the corridor  Ambient air As per Included in MPRDC /CSC due to due to  Regular maintenance of the road will be Protection Act, quality (PM10, CPCB Operation/ vehicular movement done to ensure good surface condition 1986; The Air CO, NOx) requirement Maintenance (Prevention and s, site cost  Vehicular air pollution will be managed  Survival rate of Control of inspection and monitored. trees planted Pollution) Act,  Ambient air quality monitoring. If monitored 1981 parameters are above the prescribed limit, suitable control measures must be taken.  Technological and behavioural changes.  Road signs shall be provided reminding the motorist to properly maintain their vehicles to economize on fuel consumption and protect the environment. 2. Noise

3. Land and Soil

264 Appendix 8

3.1 Soil erosion at  Periodic checking to be carried to assess the Project  At bridge locations &  Existence of soil On site Included in MPRDC /CSC Embankment during effectiveness of the stabilization measures requirement embankment slopes and erosion sites observation Operation/ heavy rain fall. viz. turning, stone pitching, river training other probable soil  Number of soil Maintenance structures etc. erosion areas. erosion sites cost  Necessary measures to be followed wherever there are failures.

Appendix 8 265

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementati Supervision C. Operation stage on 4. Water resources/Flooding and Inundation 4.1 Siltation  Regular checks shall be made for soil erosion Project  Near surface water  Water quality Site Included in MPRDC /CSC and turning conditions of river training requirement bodies observation Operation/ structures for its effective maintenance. Maintenance cost 4.2 Water logging  Regular visual checks and cleaning of drains Project  Near surface water  Presence of Site Included in MPRDC /CSC due to blockage shall be done along the alignment to ensure requirement bodies flooded areas observation Operation/ of drains, culverts or that flow of water is maintained through cross or areas with Maintenance streams drains and other channels /streams. water stagnation e cost  Monitoring of water borne diseases due to stagnant water bodies.

4.3 Road inundation  MPRDC will ensure that all drains (side Project  Near surface water  Incidents of Field Included in MPRDC /CSC due to choking of drains and all cross drainages) are requirement bodies flooding & road observation, Operation/ drainage channels periodically cleared especially before inundation with Interaction Maintenance monsoon season to facilitate the quick details with local cost passage of rainwater and avoid flooding. community

5. Flora 5.1 Vegetation  Planted trees, shrubs, and grasses to be Forest  Project tree plantation  Minimum of Records and Operation MPRDC /CSC properly maintained. Conservation sites 70% of tree fields and  The tree survivalist audit to be conducted at Act 1980 survival observations Maintenance least once in a year to assess the Cost effectiveness. 6. Maintenance of Right of Way and Safety 6.1 Accident Risk  Efforts shall be made to make shoulder Project  Throughout the project  Presence of and Visual Included in MPRDC /CSC due to uncontrolled completely clear of vegetation. requirement route extent of Inspection, operation/ growth of vegetation  Regular maintenance of plantation along the vegetation Accident Maintenance roadside. growth on either records cost  Invasive plant not to be planted near the road. side of road Accident data 6.2 Accident risks  Traffic control measures, including speed IRC:SP:55  Throughout the project  Police records Review Included in MPRDC /CSC associated with traffic limits, will be enforced strictly. route on accident accident operation/ movement.  Further encroachment of squatters within the condition and records, Maintenance ROW will be prevented. existence of Site cost observation  No school or hospital will be allowed to be safety signs, s established beyond the stipulated planning rumble strips line as per relevant local law etc. on the road  Monitor/ensure that all safety provisions  Presence/ included in design and construction phase are absence of properly maintained sensitive receptor  Highway patrol unit(s) for round the clock structures inside patrolling. Phone booths for accidental the stipulated reporting and ambulance services with planning line as minimum response time for rescue of any per relevant accident victims, if possible. local law

266 Appendix 8

Environmental Reference to Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Remedial Measure Location Issue/ Component laws indicators Methods Costs Implementation Supervision C. Operation stage 6.3 Transport of  Existence of spill prevention and control and  Throughout the project  Status of Review of Included in MPRDC /CSC dangerous goods emergency responsive system. stretch emergency spill Operation/  Emergency plan for vehicles carrying system–whether prevention Maintenance hazardous material. operational or and cost. not emergency response system Spill

Note EA: Executing Agency , MPRDC: Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation, EO: Environmental Officer, IRC: Indian Road Congress

i. The“Projectengineer”or “theengineer”istheteamof ConstructionSupervisionConsultants(CSC)responsiblefor approvingtheplans, engineeringdrawing,releaseofpaymentstocontractoretc.onbehalfoftheemployer(MPRDC).ItisusuallytheteamleaderoftheCSCthat takestheresponsibilityofsigningapprovaldocumentson behalfof theCSCteam. j. The “environmental officer” is the environmental specialist under the CSC who is responsible for providing recommendations to the CSC team leader for approving activities specific to environment safeguards on behalf of “the engineer”.

Appendix 8 267

Table 2: Environmental Monitoring Plan (Contract Package No. 20) Environmental Monitoring Institutional Responsibility Location Frequency Components Parameters Special Guidance Standards Implementation Supervision

Note Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation, PIU- Project Implementation Unit, CSC- Construction Supervision Consultant

268 Appendix 8

SL. NO ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT RATE (Rs.) AMOUNT (Rs.) RESPONSIBILITY

A Forest Clearance and Compensatory Afforestation

Compensatory afforestation and avenue PIU through Forest A.1 plantation @1:10 trees including 3 year 8900 No. 1000 8900000 Department maintainance

B Environmental Monitoring

Water quality monitoring of drinking water during construction and operations phases (3 times in a B.4 81 No. 5000 405000 year for 3 years or construction period at 3 location sites)

Soil quality monitoring during construction and B.5 operations phases (3 times in a year for 3 years 81 No. 10000 810000 or construction period at 3 location sites)

C Noise Barrier at Sensitive Location

Provide the Noise barrier at sensitive areas like schools and temples.The noise barriers of hollow Contractor through C.1 brick wall/reinforced concrete panels with height 1700 Rm 2000 3400000 BOQ of 3.5m. The design of the noise barrier shall be approved by the engineer in charge.

D Solid Waste Management

Solid Waste Management during entire project D.1 108 No. 3000/; month 324000 period

E Dust Suppression

Dust Suppression along the entire project length 2000/- per day E.1 2160 No. 4320000 three tankers in a days for 240 Days per tanker F Environmental Training

PIU through Training at site : Three training sessions during 50000 per F.1 9 per sessions 450000 Supervision construction period session Consultant TOTAL COST = 20526000

Appendix 9 269

Appendix 9: Guidelines for Tree Plantation and Management

Preparation of the Plantation Area: For plantation in new areas it always economical and comfortable to plant trees in blocks. The open areas near the subproject roads will be identified and selected. During the selection of the block plantation sites, the availability of the water in nearby areas will be taken into consideration as the survival of the tree saplings depends on the availability of water or watering facilities.

Preparation of Pits and Sapling Transplantation: The location of each plantation pit will be marked according to the design and distance of the plantation. The size of the plantation pit varies depending upon the species of the plants, height of the saplings. Trees will be planted on the alternate rows in a straight line for the prevention of the horizontal dispersion of the pollutants. Hence the pit will be dig accordingly. During the time of placing the tree saplings the roots will be freed from plastic or any type of cover which is normally use for the transplantation of the tree saplings from the seed bed to the tree plantation pits. This exercise will help the root hairs to reach the soil.

Spacing: For the survivability of the tree species planted spacing between the saplings should be maintained. Spacing which are usually used for teak planting are 2 x 2 m2, 3 x 1 m2, 3 x 3 m2, 4 x 2 m2 and 4 x 4 m2, depending on site condition. However, wider spacing of 6 x 1 m2 can also be adopted sometimes where the survivability is high. Closer spacing is used for straight timber of good quality.

Time of Plantation: As per the normal practices followed under the silvicultural guidelines plantation of the tree sapling to be done only after the first shower during the rainy season. The best time for plantation is after 15 days from the day of first shower during rainy season.

Protection of Tree saplings: Circular tree guard should be placed after the plantation of the saplings for the protection of these young plants from the ravages of cattle, sheep and goat and other animals. If tree saplings died or damage occur after placing the circular tree guard, timely replacements of damaged plant and thereafter care is important.

Selection of Tree Species: The selection of the tree species to be planted plays a crucial role for higher survivability rate. This is always better to choose the local and Vulnerable, endemic species.

Maintenance (include thinning) : Weeding: Low pruning at 6 months, Thinning: Thinning will start after the stand is 3-4 years old and repeated every 4 years until the stand is 15 years old. Between 15-25 years old, thinning should be conducted every 5 years and after 25 years old, thinning will be done after every 10 years. When the canopy closes, at about 6 years, 30-40% of the stems will be thinned to selectively remove suppressed, diseased and badly formed trees.

Survivability: Periodic assessment will be carried for survivability of the trees. Minimum 70% survival rate will be achieved.

Records: The following records will be maintained: 1. Record of Tree plantation 2. Record of Survivability rate

Reporting: The tree plantation and survivability report will be sent to EA six monthly

Responsibility:

270 Appendix 9

Prime Responsibility: PIU through contractor or Forest Department Contractor will be responsible for tree cutting or plantation Supervisory Responsibility: Supervision Consultant to check compliance of above guidelines.

Appendix 10 271

Appendix 10: Guidelines for Borrow Area Management

Selection and Rehabilitation of Borrow Pits: Guidelines for selection of borrow pits, amount that can be borrowed and its rehabilitation in line with The Indian Road Congress (IRC):10- 1961 will be followed and are as follows:  Contractor must identify the borrow areas before start of construction and submit these details with rehabilitation plan.  Borrow areas will not be located on cultivable lands. However, if it becomes necessary to borrow earth from temporarily acquired cultivated lands, their depth will not exceed 45 cm. The topsoil to a depth of 15cm will be stripped and set aside. Thereafter, soil may be dug out to a further depth not exceeding 30 cm and used in forming the embankment.  A 15 cm topsoil will be stripped off from the borrow pit and this will be stored in stockpiles in a designated area for height not exceeding 2m and side slopes not steeper than 1:2 (Vertical: Horizontal).  Ridges of not less than 8m widths will be left at intervals not exceeding 300m. Small drains will be cut through the ridges, if necessary, to facilitate drainage. The slope of the edges will be maintained not steeper than 1:4 (vertical: Horizontal).  Borrow pit will be selected from wasteland ;  Priority will be given to the borrowing from humps above the general ground level within the road land;  Priority will be given to the borrowing by excavating/enlarging existing tanks;  Borrowing will be from land acquired temporarily and located at least 500m away from the road;  Borrowing will be from mounds resulting from the digging of well and lowering of agricultural fields in vicinity of the road;  Borrow area near to any surface water body will be at least at a distance of 15m from the toe of the bank or high flood level, whichever is maximum.  In case of settlements, borrow pits will not be selected within a distance 800 m from towns or villages. If unavoidable, earth excavation will not exceed 30cm in depth;  The haulage distance from site will not be too far.  Redevelopment plan will be prepared by the contractor before the start of work which should be duly agreed upon by land owner.  Borrow pits will be backfilled with rejected construction wastes and covered with vegetation.  Borrow areas might be used for aquaculture in case landowner wants such development.  Borrow pits located near habitat areas will be re-developed immediately after borrowing is completed. If spoils are dumped, that will be covered with a layers of stockpiled topsoil in accordance with compliance requirements with respect MOEFCC/SPCB guidelines.  Prohibit dumping of waste except inert construction rubble

Records: The following records will be maintained: 1. List of Borrow areas identification with capacity and rehabilitation plan 2. Agreement with land owners where applicable 3. Details of Earth excavated 4. Closure report of rehabilitated borrow pits.

Reporting: The Borrow area opening, earth borrowed and borrow area rehabilitation details will form part of half yearly report

272 Appendix 10

Responsibility:  Prime Responsibility: Contractor will be responsible for borrow area management and reporting  Supervisory Responsibility: Supervision Consultant will check compliance with the above guidelines.

Appendix 11 273

Appendix 11: Guidelines for Emergency Management System

Many emergencies can occur in construction sites and will need to be effectively handled. The environmental and occupational health and safety aspects and related emergency can includes incidence such as Collapse / subsidence of soil / Fire / Explosion / Gas Leak, Collapse of Building / Equipment and other Occupational Accidents. On site and off site emergency management plan will be developed to effectively handle them. The following guidelines will be used to develop these plans

Guidelines: Availability of ‘On-Site Emergency Management Plan’  The contractor will have a written on site emergency management plan. The contractor should submit a copy of this plan to MPRDC and the Supervision Consultant before the start of the work.  Contractor will develop the onsite emergency plan considering the potential environmental, occupational health and safety emergency situation at site.  Contractor will include a list of potential emergency situations in the emergency management plan including potential Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety Emergency Situations during construction, operation and maintenance stages.

Examples of potential emergency situations have been defined below for guidance purposes. The contractors may follow refer to this for developing site specific on site emergency preparedness plan.

Emergency conditions / Sources situations Collapse / subsidence of soil . Civil structures and structures . Heavy construction machinery Bulk spillage . Hazardous substance / inflammable liquid storage . Vehicular movement on highway Fire and explosion . Inflammable Storage Areas . Gas Cylinder Storage Areas . Electrical Circuits . Isolated Gas Cylinders (LPG / DA) . Welding / Gas Cutting Activity Flooding . Heavy monsoons . Upstream activities of irrigation or damming . Glacial lake outburst Flood at the source of the river Electrical Shock . HT line . LT distribution . Electrically Operated Machines / Equipment / Hand Tools / Electrical Cables Gaseous Leakage . Gas Cylinder Storage Areas . Gas Cylinder used in Gas Cutting / Welding Purposes Accidents due to Vehicles . Heavy Earth Moving Machinery . Cranes . Fork Lifts . Trucks . Workman Transport Vehicles (cars / scooters / motor cycles / cycles) . Collapse, toppling or collision of transport equipment

274 Appendix 11

Emergency conditions / Sources situations Slips & Falls . Work at Height (Roof Work, Steel Erection, Scaffold, (Man & Material) Repair & Maintenance, Erection of equipment, Excavation etc.) . Slips (Watery surfaces due to rain) . Lifting tools & Tackles (Electric Hoist & Forklifts) . Falling into the river and drowning Collision with stationary / . Vehicular movement on highway moving objects Other Hazards . Cuts &Wounds . Confined Space (under & inside machinery etc.) . Hot Burns . Pressure Impacts (Plant contains several Pressure Vessels & pipefitting containing CO2, Air, Water, product & Steam, which can cause accidents & injuries to person around.)

Design of ‘On-Site Emergency Plan’: The ‘On-site emergency plan’ to be prepared by contractor will include a minimum of the following information :  Name & Address of Contractor  Updation sheet  Project Location  Name, Designation & Contact Numbers of the organization, nearby hospitals, fire agencies etc. and key personnel including their assigned responsibilities in case of an emergency.  The roles and responsibilities of executing personnel  Site Layout Diagram  Identification of Potential Emergencies Situations/ preventive measures / control & response measures  Location of Emergency Control Centre (or designated area for emergency control / coordination) with requisite facilities.  Medical services / first aid  List of emergency equipment including fire extinguishers, fire suits etc.

Emergency Control Centre: The emergency control centre will be equipped with following facilities  Copy of current on-site emergency plan  Display of the name of site emergency controller  Appropriate numbers of artificial respiratory sets  Appropriate numbers of Stretchers  Vehicle/ambulances on each construction site for 24 hours  Adequate and reliable communication facilities (phone, handset etc.)  Site layout diagram with entry and exit routes / Assembly points  Directory of internal / external emergency phone Numbers  Fire extinguishers (DCP type / Foam Type / CO2) on all construction camps and yards  List of fire extinguishers installed in the construction sites and yards including maintenance records  A set of personal protective equipment (PPE) for each and every member of the construction team  First-aid boxes with prescribed first-aid medicines in every construction camp site and yard

Appendix 11 275

 List of competent first-aiders  List of fire trained personnel  Appropriate numbers of blankets, rescue ropes and high beam torches  Drinking water  Gas leak detectors  Life boats & jackets

Records: The following records will be maintained: 1. Record of emergency preparedness plan with emergency contact numbers 2. Mock drill/emergency preparedness exercise records 3. Corrective preventive action record after emergency is occurred

Reporting: The accident and incident records and emergency preparedness drill reports will form part of quarterly report to MPRDC and the Supervision Consultant

Responsibility:

Prime Responsibility: Contractor will be responsible for implementing the Emergency plan and reporting

Supervisory Responsibility: The Supervision Consultant will check compliance of the contractor with the above guidelines

276 Appendix 12

Appendix 12: Guidelines for Waste Disposal and Management

A Waste disposal and management plan will be prepared by the contractor before start of construction works and submitted to MPRDC and the Supervision Consultantfor their review and approval. The management plan will follow the guidelines as given below: (i) The debris disposal site should be identified which are preferably barren or low-lying areas away from settlements. (ii) Prior concurrence will be taken from concerned Govt. Authorities or land owner (iii) Due care should be taken during site clearance and disposal of debris so that public/ private properties are not damage or effected, no traffic are interrupted. (iv) All efforts should be made to use debris in road construction or any other public utilities. (v) The debris should be stored at site ensuring that existing water bodies and drains within or adjacent to the site are kept safe and free and no blocking of drains occurs. (vi) All dust prone material should be transported in a covered truck. (vii) All liquid waste like oils and paint waste should be stored at identified locations and preferably on a cemented floor. Provision of spill collection pit will be made in the floor to collect the spilled oil or paint. These should be sold off to authorized recyclers. (viii) All domestic waste generated at construction camp preferably be composted in portable mechanized composter. The composted material will be used as manure. In case composting is not feasible, the material will either be disposed off though municipal waste disposal system or disposed of through land burial. The dump site must be covered up with at least six inch thick layer of soil. (ix) Only appropriately design and compliant landfills will be used for disposing waste (x) All efforts should be made that no chemical/ oily waste spill over to ground or water bodies. (xi) All precautions should be followed for emergency preparedness and occupational health & safety during construction and handling a waste. (xii) Provision of fire extinguishers will be made at the storage area (xiii) Adequate traffic control signals and barriers should be used in case traffic is to be diverted during debris disposal. All efforts should be made to ensure avoidance of traffic jam, which otherwise results in air pollution, noise pollution and public unrest. (xiv) Hazardous waste and chemicals should be stored in a dedicated storage area that has: 1) weather protection, 2) solid impermeable surface and drainage to treatment system, 3) security fence/lock, 4) primary and secondary containment with 110% volume for liquids. (xv) Domestic waste shall only be disposed of at the approved, appropriately designed, compliant waste management facility (landfill). Land burial of waste shall not be permitted.

Records: The following records will be maintained  Generation and disposal quantity with location of disposal  Recyclables waste generation and disposal  Domestic waste disposal locations details

Reporting: The waste generation and disposal details will form part of quarterly report to MPRDCL

Appendix 12 277

Responsibility: Prime Responsibility: Contractor will be responsible for waste management and reporting Supervisory Responsibility: Supervision Consultantwill check the contractor’s adherence to the above guidelines

278 Appendix 13

Appendix 13: Outline of an Environmental Monitoring Report

1. Introduction

(Report Purpose, Brief project background including organizational set up, list of roads, planned project schedule etc., Details on Project Implementation Progress with details on current site works, location, earthworks, vegetation clearing, spoils disposal, establishment of construction camp and other construction related facilities (e.g., concrete mixing plant, asphalt batching plant, crushing plant, etc.), establishment and operation of quarry/borrow areas, etc., including locations, schedules, dates, etc., Schedule of construction activities for the subsequent months).

2. Compliance on Environment Safeguards Requirements

(Status of compliance with ADB loan covenants: provide a list of environmental loan covenants and specify level of compliance).

Status of compliance with government environmental requirements: provide a list of government environmental requirements (permits, etc.) for the project as well as construction-related facilities/ activities and specify level of compliance, indicate any required environmental permit/license/consent obtained to date and to be obtained (including schedule) for the project and construction related facilities/activities).

3. Changes in project scope

(Such as change in alignment or footprint in case of horizontal infrastructure, implementation of additional Project component/s, etc. (with reference to the Project scope identified in the ADB- cleared environmental assessment report , i.e., IEE or EIA) and corresponding safeguard measures undertaken, if applicable).

4. Implementation of Environmental Management Plan

(Indicate the manner by which EMP requirements are incorporated into contractual arrangements, such as with contractors or other parties.

Summary of Environmental Mitigations and Compensation Measures Implemented.

Based on EMP; may include measures related to air quality, water quality, noise quality, pollution prevention, biodiversity and natural resources, health and safety, physical cultural resources, capacity building, and others. Provide a table/matrix showing a summary of each environmental mitigation measure specified in the EMP.

EMP Requirement (list Comment on Issues for Further Compliance Attained all mitigation measures Reasons for Partial Action and Target (Yes, No, Partial) specified in the EMP) or Non-Compliance Dates 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. etc.

5. Environmental Monitoring Activities

Appendix 13 279

(Compliance Inspections, Summary of Inspection Activities, Mitigation Compliance15 Mitigation Effectiveness 16. Findings of Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMOP) on quality of air, noise, water etc. and Results Assessment17)

6. Key Environmental Issues

(Key Issues Identified (e.g., non-compliance to loan covenants, EMP and/or government environmental requirements, insufficient mitigation measures to address Project impacts, incidents, accidents, etc.) Actions Taken and Corrective Action Plan (specify actions taken and corrective action plans to be implemented to address non-compliance and other identified issues. Such action plan should provide details of specific actions to be undertaken to resolve identified issues, responsible persons who will carry out such actions and timeframe/target date to carry out and complete required actions. The action plan could be presented in a tabular/matrix form (see below). Timeframe and responsibilities for reporting to ADB on the progress of implementation of corrective action plan should also be specified under this section.)

Description of Required Timing Issue Cause Responsibility Resolution and Action (Target Dates) Timing (Actual) Old Issues from Previous Reports 1. 2. New Issues from this Report 1. 2.

Complaints: Details of Complaint/s (Provide details of any complaints that have been raised by the local population and other stakeholders regarding environmental performance and environmental impacts (complainant, nature of complaint, date complaint was filed, which office received the complaint, etc.)

15 Overall compliance with mitigation implementation requirements could be described in qualitative terms or be evaluated based on a ranking system, such as the following: 1. Very Good (all required mitigations implemented) 2. Good (the majority of required mitigations implemented) 3. Fair (some mitigations implemented) 4. Poor (few mitigations implemented) 5. Very Poor (very few or no mitigations implemented) Additional explanatory comments should be provided as necessary.

16 Effectiveness of mitigation implementation could be described in qualitative terms or be evaluated based on a ranking system, such as the following: 1. Very Good (mitigations are fully effective) 2. Good (mitigations are generally effective) 3. Fair (mitigations are partially effective) 4. Poor (mitigations are generally ineffective) 5. Very Poor (mitigations are completely ineffective) Additional explanatory comments should be provided as necessary.

17 Discharge levels should be compared to the relevant discharge standards and/or performance indicators noted in the EMP. Any exceedences should be highlighted for attention and follow-up. In addition, discharge levels could be compared to baseline conditions (if baseline data is available) and described in qualitative terms or be evaluated based on a ranking system, such as the following: 1. Very Good (overall conditions are generally improved) 2. Good (conditions are maintained or slightly improved) 3. Fair (conditions are unchanged) 4. Poor (conditions are moderately degraded) 5. Very Poor (conditions are significantly degraded) Additional explanatory comments should be provided as necessary.

280 Appendix 13

Action Taken (Document how the complaints were addressed or will be addressed by indicating the following:

i. names and designation of specific staff or officials within the Grievance Redress Committee, executing agency, project management unit, local government, contractor and/or supervision consultant involved in receiving, documenting, and resolving the complaint (s). ii. specific actions taken to be taken to resolve the complaint and corresponding timeframe

7. Conclusion and Recommendation

Overall Progress of Implementation of Environmental Management Measures18 Problems Identified and Actions Recommended Monitoring adjustment (recommended monitoring modifications based on monitoring experience/trends and stakeholders response)

8. Appendices

Site Inspection / Monitoring Reports Source and Ambient Monitoring Results (Laboratory Analysis) Photographs Location Map of Sampling Stations Copies of Environmental Permits/Approvals Other relevant information/documents

18Overall sector environmental management progress could be described in qualitative terms or be evaluated based on a ranking system, such as the following: 1. Very Good 2. Good 3. Fair 4. Poor 5. Very Poor Additional explanatory comments should be provided as necessary.

Appendix 14 281

Appendix 14: Impacts of Climate Change on Road Transport in the State of Madhya Pradesh

1. Introduction

In general, transport can be vulnerable to many different types of weather conditions, of which, some of them could be exacerbated with climate change. Many of them relate to extreme weather conditions (e.g. storms, extreme precipitations, extreme temperatures) which on their turn may result in severe consequences for the physical environment (e.g. floods, landslides,…) and represent risks for transport infrastructures and operations.

Depending on future global warming and the region of Madhya Pradesh in India, transport modes and system components could be affected by one or several simultaneous changes in climate conditions, including hotter summers, extreme precipitation events and increased storminess. If such impacts are not anticipated in future transport infrastructure design and maintenance, those changing weather conditions could, in some regions, accelerate their deterioration, increase severe damages risks, traffic interruption and accidents which could, on their turn, affect economic activities.

Districts in Madhya Pradesh are identified as being amongst the highest in India in terms of social vulnerability in a study which examined exposure to the effects of climate change and economic globalization19. Natural calamities like drought, floods and hailstorms are a common feature for the state. Almost every year one or other part of the state is generally hot. The MP State of Environment report has analyzed the natural disasters in the state (mainly drought, floods and heat waves).

2. Literature Review on Climate Variability over Madhya Pradesh

2.1 Madhya Pradesh State Action Plan on Climate Change (MP SAPCC)20

This draft version of the State Action Plan on Climate Change (MP SAPCC), developed by the Government of Madhya Pradesh (GoMP), aims to address the regional concerns and to outline strategies required to develop a climate resilient state. The strategies and recommendations of the MPSAPCC intend in due course, to strengthen the developmental planning process of the state with policy level interventions favoring low carbon growth.

Chapter 4 of draft MP SAPCC report, on observed climate trends and projected climate change, mentions Madhya Pradesh to have a subtropical climate with three distinct seasons, viz. winter from December to February followed by summer season from March to May and rainy season extending from June to October. During winters the mean temperature remains around 100C and mean maximum temperature remains 250C and the minimum temperature goes down to 10C in some regions. During summers, the mean minimum temperature is 220C and mean maximum is 380C. The maximum temperature during summer can go up to 480C, especially in May and June which are the hottest months.

The average annual rainfall for the state is 1160 mm. Rainfall is heaviest in the south-eastern parts of the state and it decreases as one move towards the north-west. Balaghat in the south receives the maximum rains; where average rainfall is above 1600 mm. The other southern districts of Mandla, Dindori and Anuppur receive between 1200-1400 mm of rain. The rainfall drops to the 1000-1200 mm as one move further north and west. Western districts in MP including most of those in the Malwa plateau and Sheopur and Shivpuri in the north receives

19O‟Brien, K R., Leichenko, U, Kelkar, H. Venema. G. Aandahl, H. Tomkins, A. Javed, S. Bhadwal, S. Barg, L. Nygaard and J. West, 2004; Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalisation in India. Global Environmental Change vol 14 p303-313. 20 Prepared by Environmental Planning and Coordination Organization (EPCO), Housing and Environment Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh (GoMP), a collaborative effort between the GoMP and UNDP, February, 2012; (www.epco.in)

282 Appendix 14

800-1000 mm of rain. Average annual rainfall is below 800 mm in the south-western tip of the state, including southern half of Jhabua and western half of Barwani district. The rainfall is below 800 mm in the districts lying in the north most part of the state including Morena, Datia, Gwalior and Bhind. Most of the rainfall in the state is received from the south-west monsoon during June to September

Trends of average annual monsoon rain fall analyzed for the period 1961 to 2002 show an inter- annual variability of average monsoon rain fall in the 41 year period, and the rain fall trend is seen to be decreasing as deciphered from the negative slope of the equation representing the linear trends. Further a study carried out by Goswami et al (2006)21, for observations spanning 50 years in the Central Indian region including Madhya Pradesh, indicates that the extreme precipitation events which are above 100 mm are increasing in terms of their intensity and frequency, with low and moderate events becoming more and more infrequent.

2.2 Climate Projections – MP SAPCC draft report

The MP SAPCC draft report provides climate projections for 2030s (2021-2050) and 2080s (2071-2098) that have been derived from PRECIS (Providing Regional Climate for Impact Studies), which is a desktop version of the HadRM3 model with a grid resolution of 0.44° x 0.44°. PRECIS simulation dataset was provided by the Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune. The climate change scenarios were driven by the GHG emission scenarios - A1B which assumes a future world of very rapid economic growth, a global population that peaks in mid- century and declines thereafter, and assumes rapid introduction of new and more efficient technologies. Change in precipitation and temperature in 2030s and end of the century 2080s have been derived with respect to 1970s (1961-1990).

2.2.1 Temperature

The average surface daily maximum temperatures, in the period 2030s is projected to rise by 1.8-2.0oC throughout Madhya Pradesh and the daily minimum temperature is projected to rise between 2.0oC to 2.4oC during the same period; the eastern half of the state experiencing more warming than the western half. By 2080s, the maximum temperature is projected to rise between 3.4oC to 4.4oC with northern region experiencing warmer temperatures.

2.2.2 Rainfall

Projections of rainfall in Madhya Pradesh for the period 2021 to 2050 indicate that there is likely to be decrease in winter rainfall as one move from eastern part of MP to western part of MP. In pre-monsoon period, the rainfall is increasing only in the Southern part of MP, with decrease in rain fall in all other parts. In the Monsoon period, there is a slight increase in rainfall all over MP (the increase being 1.25 times the rainfall observed in the current climate), and with no change in the Morena, Shivpuri, Bhind, and Gwalior areas. During post monsoon period, slowly again the western end of MP is likely to face decrease in rain fall, with no change or little increase in rainfall in most other parts of the state. In 2100 there is an overall increase in rain fall with southern states likely to receive more rain fall in the northern states. The increase in rain fall during the post monsoon and pre monsoon periods are projected to be more than the increase in rain falls projected for the monsoon period. Table 1 summarizes the projected changes in climate parameters as derived from PRECIS.

21B. N. Goswami, V. Venugopal, D. Sengupta, M. S. Madhusoodanan,2 Prince K. Xavier; Increasing Trend of Extreme Rain Events Over India in a Warming Environment, Science 1 December 2006: Vol. 314. no. 5804, pp. 1442 - 1445

Appendix 14 283

Table 1 Projected Changes in Climate Parameters for the State of Madhya Pradesh Projected Changes in 2021-2050 2071-2100 Climate Daily maximum 1.8 - 2oC increase 3.4 - 4.4oC increase temperatures Daily Minimum 2.0 - 2.4oC increase > 4.4oC increase Temperatures Monsoon Precipitation Increase in precipitation by More than 1.35 times 1.25 times the current increase in precipitation with observed rainfall in most parts respect to observed climate of Madhya Pradesh; No in most parts of Madhya change in Morena, Shivpuri, Pradesh. With major parts of Gwalior and Bhind; Increase Hoshangabad and Damoh, in precipitation in eastern Manldla and northern parts parts of Hoshangabad, of Balaghat will experience northern part of Betul, north rain in excess of 1.45 times eastern parts of Betul and the observed climate now. Southern part of Sehore The extreme northern and western part of the state will also experience excess rainfall but less than most of the other areas Winter Precipitation Decrease in precipitation Substantial increase in precipitation in Central and South western part of Madhya Pradesh increasing from between 1.45 to 1.85 times (Source: MP SAPCC, Govt. of Madhya Pradesh, Draft Version, 2012)

2.3 Chapter V - Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures22 (Section D of Chapter V on “Climate Risks and Adaptation needs” is reproduced here as under)

Climate risks were identified following both top down and bottom up approaches. Under the top down approach changes of key climate parameters, mainly temperature and precipitation were projected for 2050 using an ensemble of Global Climate Models (GCMs). Given the projected variations of temperature and precipitation the project roads were screened for 9 types of climate risks: a. Landslide triggered by increased precipitation b. Fire c. Flood d. Drought e. Tsunami f. Cyclone wind g. Cyclone surge h. Sea level rise i. Coastal erosion

Climate risk maps based on information from the GCMs were created for the project area using Geographic Information System (GIS) maps. After overlaying the road locations on the climate risk maps low to medium risks identified for the project roads were flooding, landslides triggered by precipitation, coastal erosion and tsunami.

22Initial Environmental Examination, IND: Madhya Pradesh District Connectivity Project, Jarkua – Raigaon-Karsara Road, Prepared by Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation for the Asian Development Bank, 2015

284 Appendix 14

The overall climate change risk level identified from the above exercise is low. The key risk identified is flooding (increased storminess). Bridges and road embankments are the main project components that will be prone to flooding. Increase in temperature may also affect road safety.

Under the bottom up approach the flood prone areas in the project road were identified based on field surveys for the engineering design.

Key engineering measures taken to address the risk of flooding in the design are: increase in road embankment height in flood prone areas/sections, improvement and provision of lined longitudinal and cross drains and new culverts, improvement and new construction of minor and major bridges. Bridge heights have been designed to have a height of 0.6m above HFL for minor bridges and 0.9m above HFL for major bridges. Flood return period of 50 years for minor bridges and 100 years for major bridges have been considered.

3. Climate Change Effects on Indian Roads

Conventionally, roads and highways are designed based on historic climate, however during their design life they could well be subjected to a very different climate. The vulnerability of highways to climate change would depend on factors such as pavement type and condition and also on location-specific factors such as geology, traffic flow, and proximity to water courses. Climate change induced deterioration will create more severe damage through increased frequency of extreme events and will necessitate more routine and structural maintenance. The cost of not taking climate change into consideration could be vast in terms of traffic disruption, public safety and infrastructure repairs.

3.1 Extreme High Temperature

The state of Madhya Pradesh is no stranger to heat extremes and heat waves. Under climate change scenario, heat extremes and heat waves are likely to become more intense, longer lasting, and more frequent during this century. Increasing periods of extreme heat will place additional stress on infrastructure, reducing service life and increasing maintenance needs. Extreme maximum temperature and prolonged duration heat waves are expected to lead to premature deterioration of infrastructure. Temperature increases have the potential to affect and reduce the life of asphalt road pavements through softening and traffic-related rutting. Extreme heat can also stress the steel in bridges through thermal expansion and movement of bridge joints and paved surfaces.

Highway pavements historically have been constructed from a combination of locally available natural materials, including natural soils, select soils such as natural gravel, and processed material such as quarried stone. Pavements are constructed in layers with the weaker or least durable materials at the bottom and the stronger or most durable materials at the top. The top layers are normally bound together with some sort of binder. Commonly used binders include hydraulic cements and bituminous cements. The most widely used binder in India is asphalt, a bituminous cement which is a petroleum product refined from crude oil. What makes asphalt desirable for pavement construction is its tendency to stick to the granular material used in the upper pavement layers and thus to keep this material in place. In addition, when asphalt is heated, it becomes very fluid and can be mixed with gravel or rock, making it an easy material to process in the mass quantities required for pavement construction.

4. Extreme Value Analysis (EVA)

Appendix 14 285

The following abridged paragraphs as adopted from a WMO 23 publication highlights the rationale for focusing on weather and climate extremes.

Changes in extreme weather and climate events are now recognized to have significant impacts and are among the most serious challenges to society in coping with a changing climate. Many practical problems require knowledge of the behavior of extreme values. In particular, the infrastructures we depend upon for food, water, energy, shelter and transportation are sensitive to high or low values of meteorological variables. For example, high precipitation amounts and resulting stream flows affect sewerage systems, dams, reservoirs and bridges. The motivation for analyzing extremes is often to find an optimum balance between adopting high safety standards that are very costly on the one hand, and preventing major damage to equipment and structures from extreme events that are likely to occur during the useful life of such infrastructure on the other hand.

Most existing systems for water management and other infrastructure have been designed under the assumption that climate is stationary. This basic concept from which engineers work assumes that climate is variable, but with variations whose properties are constant with time, and which occur around an unchanging mean state. This assumption of stationarity is still common practice for design criteria for (the safety of) new infrastructure, even though the notion that climate change may alter the mean, variability and extremes of relevant weather variables is now widely accepted. New infrastructure is typically designed on the basis of historical information on weather and climate extremes. Often, the maximum value of a particular variable in the historical record is considered to be the normative value for design. In other cases, extreme value theory is applied to the historical observations of extremes to estimate the normative value, again disregarding climate change.

The report states that it is possible to account for non-stationary conditions (climate change) in extreme value analysis, but scientists are still debating the best way to do this. Nevertheless, adaptation strategies to climate change should now begin to account for the decadal scale changes (or low-frequency variability) in extremes observed in the past decades, as well as projections of future changes in extremes such as are obtained from climate models.

4.1 Data Establishment

A March 2013 draft EIA report24 for a proposed nuclear power plant to be located at Chutka, Mandla25 district of Madhya Pradesh, devotes a whole chapter on extreme value analysis of meteorological parameters. In gist, the general principles behind their EVA analysis for temperature and precipitation extremes, lies in the common practice of assumption of stationarity for deriving design criteria of the proposed nuclear power plant.

Raw data on annual maximum and annual minimum temperatures (Table 4.1, Figure 4.1), and 1-hourly and 24-hourly precipitation maximum (Table 4.2, Figure 4.2) as recorded by the Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) weather station based at Mandla, Madhya Pradesh are extracted from the nuclear plant EIA report for non-stationarity analysis as recommended by WMO under a changing climate.

By the WMO guideline (WCDMP- No. 72), a pragmatic approach is to calculate trends for any specified period regardless of cause. Trends are the simplest component of climate change and provide information on the first-order changes over the time domain considered. This implies that the physical mechanisms behind the detected trends remain unknown. The calculated

23Guidelines on Analysis of Extremes in a Changing Climate in Support of Informed Decisions for Adaptation; Climate Data and Monitoring. WCDMP-72, 2009 24 Technical Report No. 4811,Volume II(a) – Annexure I-XIV and XVI-XXII, EIA for Proposed 2x700 MWe PHWR, Chutka Madhya Pradesh Atomic Power Project; March 2013; Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd. Mumbai, National Environmental Research Institute, Nagpur, India 25Mandla is a tribal district situated in east-central Madhya Pradesh within the catchment of river Narmada and its tributaries

286 Appendix 14 trends represent changes that can be due to natural internal processes within the climate system and/or external forcing, which can either be natural, such as solar irradiance and volcanic aerosols, or anthropogenic, such as greenhouse gases.

Note that there are data gaps in both temperature and in the annual daily maximum precipitation data and a trend analysis would be highly ambiguous

Table 4.1 Annual Daily Maximum & Minimum Temperature (Mandla ARG), 0C Year Max Min 1969 45.0 2.2 1970 44.6 2.4 1971 42.0 2.0 1972 44.0 2.4 1973 46.8 2.0 1974 43.2 2.0 Figure 4.1 Annual Max and Min Temperature 1975 43.6 2.7 (Station: Mandla, MP) 1976 42.6 4.3 1977 43.5 2.5 50.0 1978 43.0 2.6 1979 43.6 2.7 1980 43.8 4.0 45.0 1981 44.2 3.5 1982 42.5 3.3 40.0 1983 42.8 3.1 1984 43.6 3.1 35.0

1985 43.8 0.1 C

1986 41.0 3.0 0 1987 41.0 0.0 30.0 1988 44.0 1.0 1989 42.0 1.0 25.0 1990 42.0 3.5 1991 42.0 0.5 1992 44.2 1.8 20.0

1993 44.5 4.0 Temperature, 1994 45.1 5.8 15.0 1995 40.7 3.0 1996 10.0 1997 1998 1999 5.0 2000 2001 43.7 2.5 0.0 2002 44.0 1.7 2003 45.0 2.4 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2004 44.0 4.5 Year 2005 44.2 4.0 2006 42.8 3.9

Table 4.2 Annual Max Rainfall (n-hourly, mm, as recored at Mandla) Year n=1 hr n= 24 hr 1969 39.5 111.0 Figure 4.2 1-hourly and 24-hourly Max Precipitation 1970 80.0 102.1 (Station: Mandla, MP) 1971 46.4 102.4 200.0 1972 35.1 163.0 1973 67.5 105.6 180.0 1974 90.0 177.6 1975 39.0 79.8 1976 39.0 80.4 160.0 1977 43.0 120.0 1978 44.5 120.0 140.0 1979 35.5 84.0 1980 54.1 124.2 1981 70.0 148.2 120.0 1982 30.0 72.0 1983 50.5 113.4 100.0 1984 34.7 152.2 1985 41.3 92.4 80.0 1986 23.0 67.6

1987 43.5 84.0 Rainfall, Max. mm 1988 41.3 81.0 60.0 1989 41.5 141.0 1990 108.8 40.0 1991 52.3 92.2 1992 96.2 20.0 1993 82.0 1994 83.5 1995 145.8 0.0 1996 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 111.5 2002 116.2 2003 101.2 2004 98.4 2005 178.2 2006 187.2

Of particular concern in the expansion and improvement of district roads in Madhya Pradesh, stresses induced on roadways by intense high temperatures and high intensity and high frequency precipitation as a result of warming climate need to be addressed as far best as possible. Such extreme weather conditions exacerbated under future climate change is widely recognized now, and if neglected in the very initial design of transport infrastructure, could lead to increasing risks thus negatively affecting transport performance in terms of safety, reliability,

Appendix 14 287 cost efficiency. Though the level of deterioration of roadways depends on a multiplicity of parameters, e.g. locations, soil, traffic load, etc., besides intense temperature and precipitation it is practically not possible to portray and specify plausible illumination covering the entire network of roadways. The next section (Sec. 4.2) attempts a benign uncovering of magnitudes of extremes in maximum temperature and precipitation that could lead the infrastructure designer to a more climate change focused consideration.

4.2 Extreme Maximum Temperature Estimation - Return Periods vs. Return Levels

Extreme value statistics are used primarily to quantify the stochastic behavior of a process at unusually large (or small) values. Particularly, such analyses usually require estimation of the probability of events that are more extreme than any previously observed. Many fields have begun to use extreme value theory and some have been using it for a very long time including meteorology, hydrology, finance and ocean wave modeling to name just a few.

The block maxima series (BMS) is one generally used method based on an explicit extreme value theory. In this method, one considers the sample of extreme values obtained by selecting the maximum (or in some cases, the minimum) value observed in each block. Blocks are typically one year in length (365 daily observations per block), or occasionally a season in length (for example, the summer maximum temperature, or winter minimum temperature). Statistical theory indicates that the Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distribution is appropriate for the block maxima when blocks are sufficiently large. In its general form, the GEV distribution has three parameters: location μ, scale σ, and shape ξ. Parameters can be estimated by the method of maximum likelihood, the method of L-moments (also referred to as probability weighted moments), or simply the ordinary method of moments. The maximum likelihood approach is preferred when samples of extremes are sufficiently large and when there is a possibility that the climate may not be stationary.

Extremes toolkit is a weather and climate applications of extreme value statistics developed by National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR, US) which can be downloaded at website: http://www.esig.ucar.edu/extremevalues/evtk.html

Simulation is an approach when uncertainty is high due to sparse data and advantageously the toolkit takes care of that and projects the parameters for each simulation run. The parameter estimations of GEV simulated for the annual highest maximum temperature at Mandla are run using “extRemes Toolkit Ver1.6, R Ver2.9.2”. (Kindly note that raw data for temperature and precipitation for 33 years with obvious data gaps as depicted in Tables 4.1 and 4.2 above, were extracted from IMD’s meteorological station at Mandla, Madhya Pradesh, as annexed in the cited Technical Report No. 4811, footnoted 4 in page 7 of this assessment report). Although a disclaimer stating the above cited technical report as the property of National Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) with all rights reserved, this report just took the liberty to glean the raw data as they had for this climate change extreme value analysis. None of their outputs are reproduced here.

The simulated GEV parameters for a stationarity case (or the conventional approach where no trend exists) and followed by another simulation assuming a shift in the location parameter (μ) by a conservative annual increment of 0.030C/year to fairly represent a warming climate within a century has been run through the “extRemes” program and are reproduced as self-explanatory and as screenshots in the following boxes 4.1 and 4.2.

288 Appendix 14

Box 4.1 Simulated GEV(Stationarity Case)

Box 4.2 Simulated GEV (Non-Stationarity with trend in Location Parameter Introduced)

The above simulated outputs indicate that Gumbel distribution cannot be rejected based on maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) test. This assessment now takes advantage of the Gumbel distribution to evaluate the highest maximum temperature at Mandla station and compares outputs of the conventional stationarity and the trend induced non-stationarity and computes return period versus return levels derived from the simulated data. See Figure 4.3

Thus following Gumbel distribution (EVA Type I), the following equations estimates return periods (recurrence intervals) of extreme temperatures: 푥푇 = 푥̅ + 퐼퐾푇 푠 (Eq. 4.1) where, 0 푥푇 = n-year return period value of extreme temperature to be estimated, C 푥̅ = mean of annual extreme maximum or minimum temperatures, 0C 푠 = standard deviation of annual extreme maximum or minimum temperatures, 0C

Appendix 14 289

퐼= 1 if maximum is being considered; and, = - 1 if minimum is being considered and, frequency factor, KTas: 6 푛 퐾 = − √ {0.5772 + 푙푛 [푙푛 ( )]} (Eq. 4.2) 푇 휋 푛−1

4.3 24-hourly Extreme Precipitation Estimation - Return Periods vs. Return Levels

(-similar analysis as in Sec 4.2; trend projected for 1.25 x current observed 24-hr rainfall by Table 2.1)- Results illustrated below.

Box 4.3 Simulated GEV(Stationarity Case)

290 Appendix 14

Box 4.4 Simulated GEV (Non-Stationarity with trend in Location Parameter Introduced)

Theoretically, the intensity of a storm varies with duration in such a way that intensity generally corresponds to short durations, and low intensity to larger duration. In this analysis, average intensity of rainfall over relevant durations is estimated based on the non-stationary highest maximum projections of 24-hour rainfall as shown in Figure 4.4. As intense storms can produce heavy downpours on scales of minutes and where the design geometry of the bridge or highway drainage system would suffer by not being able to accommodate the sudden storm runoff, a depth-duration rating derived from Eq.(4.3) is presented in Table 4.3.

The Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) uses an empirical reduction formula equation (Eq. 4.3)26 for estimation of rainfall depths for various duration like 1-hr, 2-hr, etc. rainfall values from annual maximum values. This formula is used to estimate the short duration rainfall from daily rainfall data in of Mandla Station as it is supposed to be the best estimation of short duration rainfall for the Indian sub-continent. 3 푡 푃 = 푃 √ (Eq. 4.3) 푡 24 24

26IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology (IOSR-JESTFT) e-ISSN: 2319-2402,p- ISSN: 2319-2399.Volume 9, Issue 9 Ver. I (Sep. 2015), PP 41-47 www.iosrjournals.org

Appendix 14 291 where, t is specified time (in hours) for which rainfall amount needs to be estimated, Pt is rainfall depth in mm in t hours and P24 is total rainfall in 24 h.

Under cyclonic disturbances, heavy rainfall occurs in regions exposed to these disturbances, particularly the coastal areas of India. Rainfall caused by such depressions can range from 40 to 80 cm per day (Rakhecha & Picharoty, Current Science, Vol.71, No 3, Aug 1996); a screenshot (Box 4.5) of their estimate for highest rainfall for 1-day duration for the period 1875 to 1982 under cyclonic disturbances is reproduced below.

Box 4.5

4.4 Wind and Cyclone Hazard

Climate change is speculated to increase the frequency of high-intensity storms mainly in coastal basins as in theory a warmer world should indeed produce more potent atmospheric disturbances creating cyclones. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reckons that the frequency of cyclones will stay the same or decrease while their average intensity goes up, but the evidence so far is confusing as there is no consensus on the cause of them. Worldwide, there is no trend in either the frequency or the intensity of tropical storms.

Literature (footnoted 8 on page 7 of this report) states that wind data are collected just twice a day at 8:30 hrs and 17:30 hrs in weather stations in Madhya Pradesh. Round the clock wind data recorded at least in hourly intervals would have been useful in establishing an EVA of wind speeds. Unfortunately such data do not exist and hence no further analysis can be performed.

292 Appendix 14

However, a wind and cyclone vulnerability map27 produced by IMD (Box 4.6) may provide some indications as to maximum wind speeds. Madhya Pradesh seems to fall under moderate damage risk zone, with maximum winds at around 44 m/s. Under an uncertain future climate, it would be prudent judgment to consider the wind speed by an allowance, say some + 20%, in the design of bridges and other ancillary facilities related to the road project.

Box 4.6

Bibliography

1. O‟Brien, K R., Leichenko, U, Kelkar, H. Venema. G. Aandahl, H. Tomkins, A. Javed, S. Bhadwal, S. Barg, L. Nygaard and J. West, 2004; Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalisation in India. Global Environmental Change vol 14 p303-313. 2. Madhya Pradesh State Action Plan on Climate Change (MP SAPCC), draft version, 2012 3. B. N. Goswami, V. Venugopal, D. Sengupta, M. S. Madhusoodanan,2 Prince K. Xavier; Increasing Trend of Extreme Rain Events Over India in a Warming Environment, Science 1 December 2006: Vol. 314. no. 5804, pp. 1442 – 1445 4. Initial Environmental Examination, IND: Madhya Pradesh District Connectivity Project, Jarkua – Raigaon - Karsara Road, Prepared by Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation for the Asian Development Bank, 2015 5. Rutting Characteristics of 40mm thick Bituminous Concrete Mix with Plain and Modified Binders at Varying Temperatures using Treaded Wheel,Kiran Kumar V. & Ganesh K., Vol.41, No.11, (Page 16), November 2013, Indian Highways, A Review of Road and Road Transport Development, The Indian Road Congress, www.irc.org.in 6. Guidelines on Use of Modified Bitumen in Road Construction (Second Revision), November 2010, Indian Road Congress 7. Guidelines on Analysis of Extremes in a Changing Climate in Support of Informed Decisions for Adaptation; Climate Data and Monitoring. WCDMP-72, 2009 8. Technical Report No. 4811, Volume II(a) – Annexure I-XIV and XVI-XXII, EIA for Proposed 2x700 MWe PHWR, Chutka Madhya Pradesh Atomic Power Project; March 2013; Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd. Mumbai, National Environmental Research Institute, Nagpur, India 9. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology (IOSR-JESTFT) e-ISSN: 2319-2402,p- ISSN: 2319-2399.Volume 9, Issue 9 Ver. I (Sep. 2015), PP 41-47 www.iosrjournals.org

27http://www.hpsdma.nic.in/ResourceList/Maps/WindIndia.pdf