Horseshoes (Edited from Wikipedia)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Horseshoes (Edited from Wikipedia) Horseshoes (Edited from Wikipedia) SUMMARY A horseshoe is a fabricated product, normally made of metal, although sometimes made partially or wholly of modern synthetic materials, designed to protect a horse's hoof from wear. Shoes are attached on the palmar surface of the hooves, usually nailed through the insensitive hoof wall that is anatomically akin to the human toenail, although much larger and thicker. However, there are many cases where shoes are glued. The fitting of horseshoes is a professional occupation, conducted by a farrier, who specializes in the preparation of feet, assessing potential lameness issues, and fitting appropriate shoes, including remedial features where required. In some countries, such as the United Kingdom, horseshoeing is legally restricted to only people with specific qualifications and experience. In others, such as the United States, where professional licensing is not legally required, professional organizations provide certification programs that publicly identify qualified individuals. Horseshoes are available in a wide variety of materials and styles, developed for different types of horse and for the work they do. The most common materials are steel and aluminum, but specialized shoes may include use of rubber, plastic, magnesium, titanium, or copper. Steel tends to be preferred in sports where a strong, long-wearing shoe is needed, such as polo, eventing, show jumping, and western riding events. Aluminum shoes are lighter, making them common in horse racing, where a lighter shoe is desired; and often facilitate certain types of movement, and so are favored in the discipline of dressage. Some horseshoes have "caulkins", "caulks", or "calks": protrusions at the toe or heels of the shoe, or both, to provide additional traction. HISTORY Since the early history of domestication of the horse, working animals were found to be exposed to many conditions that created breakage or excessive hoof wear. Ancient people recognized the need for the walls (and sometimes the sole) of domestic horses' hooves to have additional protection over and above any natural hardness. An early form of hoof protection was seen in ancient Asia, where horses' hooves were wrapped in rawhide, leather or other materials for both therapeutic purposes and protection from wear. From archaeological finds in Great Britain, the Romans appeared to have 1 attempted to protect their horses' feet with a strap-on, solid-bottomed "hipposandal" that has a slight resemblance to the modern hoof boot. Historians have expressed differing opinions on the origin of the horseshoe. Because iron was a valuable commodity, and any worn out items were generally melted down and reused, it is difficult to locate clear archaeological evidence. Although some credit the Druids, there is no hard evidence to support this claim. In 1897 four bronze horseshoes with what are apparently nail holes were found in an Etruscan tomb dated around 400 B.C. The assertion by some historians that the Romans invented the "mule shoes" sometime after 100 BC is supported by a reference by Catullus who died in 54 BC. However, these references to use of horseshoes and muleshoes in Rome, may have been to the "hipposandal"—leather boots, reinforced by an iron plate, rather than to nailed horseshoes. Existing references to the nailed shoe are relatively late, first known to have appeared around AD 900, but there may have been earlier uses given that some have been found in layers of dirt. The earliest clear written record of iron horseshoes is a reference to "crescent figured irons and their nails" in AD 910. There is very little evidence of any sort that suggests the existence of nailed-on shoes prior to AD 500 or 600, though there is a find dated to the 5th century A.D. of a horseshoe, complete with nails, found in the tomb of the Frankish King Childeric I at Tournai, Belgium. English horseshoes from the 11th to the 19th centuries Around 1000 AD, cast bronze horseshoes with nail holes became common in Europe. Common was a design with a scalloped outer rim and six nail holes. The 13th and 14th centuries brought the widespread manufacturing of iron horseshoes. By the time of the Crusades (1096–1270), horseshoes were widespread and frequently mentioned in various written sources. In that period, due to the value of iron, horseshoes were even accepted in lieu of coin to pay taxes. By the 13th century, shoes were forged in large quantities and could be bought ready- made. Hot shoeing, the process of shaping a heated horseshoe immediately before placing it on the horse, became common in the 16th century. From the need for horseshoes, the craft of blacksmithing became "one of the great staple crafts of medieval and modern times and contributed to the development of metallurgy.” A treatise titled "No Foot, No Horse" was published in England in 1751. 2 In 1835, the first U.S. patent for a horseshoe manufacturing machine capable of making up to 60 horseshoes per hour was issued to Henry Burden. In the mid 19th century Canada, marsh horseshoes kept horses from sinking into the soft intertidal mud during dike-building. In a common design, a metal horseshoe holds a flat wooden shoe in place. THE NEED FOR HORSESHOES Many changes brought about by domestication of the horse have led to a need for shoes for number of reasons, mostly linked to management that results in horses' hooves hardening less and being more vulnerable to injury. In the wild, a horse may travel up to 50 miles per day to obtain adequate forage. While horses in the wild covered large areas of terrain, they usually did so at relatively slow speeds, unless being chased by a predator. They also tended to live in arid steppe climates. The consequence of slow but nonstop travel in a dry climate is that horses' feet are naturally worn to a small, smooth, even and hard state. The continual stimulation of the sole of the foot keeps it thick and hard. However, in domestication, the ways horses are used differ from what they would encounter in their natural environment. Domesticated horses were brought to colder and wetter areas than their ancestral habitat. These softer and heavier soils soften the hooves and have made them prone to splitting, making hoof protection necessary. Consequently, it was in northern Europe that the nailed horseshoe arose in its modern form. Domesticated horses are also subject to inconsistent movement between stabling and work, they must carry or pull additional weight, and in modern times they are often kept and worked on very soft footing, such as irrigated land, arena footing, or stall bedding. In some cases, management is also inadequate. The hooves of horses that are kept in stalls or small turnouts, even when cleaned adequately, are exposed to more moisture than would be encountered in the wild, as well as to ammonia from urine. The hoof capsule is mostly made from keratin, a protein, and is weakened by this exposure, becoming even more fragile and soft. Shoes do not prevent or reduce damage from moisture and ammonia exposure. Rather, they protect already weakened hooves. Further, without the natural conditioning factors present in the wild, the feet of horses grow overly large and long unless trimmed regularly. Hence, protection from rocks, pebbles, and hard, uneven surfaces is lacking. A balanced diet with proper nutrition also is a factor. Without these precautions, cracks in overgrown and overly brittle hoof walls are a danger, as is bruising of the soft tissues within the foot because of inadequately thick and hard sole material. 3 Physical stresses requiring horseshoes Abnormal stress: Horses' hooves can become quite worn out when subjected to the added weight and stress of a rider, pack load, cart, or wagon. Corrective shoeing: The shape, weight, and thickness of a horseshoe can significantly affect the horse's gait. Farriers may forge custom shoes to help horses with bone or musculature problems in their legs, or fit commercially available remedial shoes. Traction: Traction devices such as borium for ice, horse shoe studs for muddy or slick conditions, calks, carbide-tipped road nails and rims are useful for performance horses such as eventers, show jumpers, polo ponies, and other horses that perform at high speeds, over changing terrain, or in less-than-ideal footing. Gait manipulation: Some breeds such as the Saddlebred, Tennessee Walking Horse, and other gaited horses are judged on their high-stepping movement. Special shoeing can help enhance their natural movement. Racing horses with weakness in their foot or leg require specialized horseshoes. HIPPOSANDAL The Hipposandal is a device that protected the hoof of a horse. It was commonplace in the northwestern countries of the Roman Empire, and was a predecessor to the horseshoe. The necessity of protecting the horse hoof was recognized by the ancient Greeks and Romans, and written about by Xenophon. An early form of hoof protection was seen in ancient Asia, where horses' hooves were wrapped in rawhide, leather or other materials for both therapeutic purposes and protection from wear. Elsewhere, various methods were employed to trim the hoof into a hollow form and give it as much hardness as possible. Gradually, protection items started to appear, first with the soleae Sparteae , a sort of leather hoof boot, later improved into the soleae ferreae that featured metal studded soles similar to contemporary military boots. The hipposandal, which appears in the Celtic-Roman area north of the Alps around the mid-1st century AD, was the next step in the development of hoof protection, where the sole of the boot was made of metal. It included an oval-shaped cup of thick metal that enclosed and protected the hoof, complete with a fixation system.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 1 Barbarian Agency and Imperial Withdrawal: the Causes And
    Chapter 1 Barbarian agency and imperial withdrawal: the causes and consequences of political change in fourth- and fifth-century Trier and Cologne Introduction Snapshots from the years 310, 410, and 510 reveal that the political landscape of the Rhineland changed almost beyond recognition over the course of three centuries. In 310 AD, Trier was one of the foremost cities of the Roman Empire, acting as a main residence of the Emperor Constantine and the seat of the Gallic praetorian prefecture. In Cologne, meanwhile, the completion of the fortress of Divitia just across the Rhine reinforced the city’s significance in the context of imperial defensive strategy. By 410 AD, however, both the imperial residence and the praetorian prefecture had been removed from Trier, and many frontier troops who had been stationed near Cologne were gone. The Rhineland had suffered an apparently devastating barbarian invasion, that of the Vandals, Alans, and Sueves in 406, and was to face many more attacks in the coming half-century. After the invasion, the legitimate emperors were never to re- establish their firm control in the region, and the reign of the usurper Constantine III (407 - 411) marked the last period of effective imperial rule. Around 510 AD, the last vestiges of imperial political power had vanished, and both Trier and Cologne were part of the Frankish kingdom of Clovis. The speed and extent of this change must have dramatically affected many aspects of life within the cities, and, as such, it is crucial that we seek to understand what brought it about. In so doing, we must consider the fundamental question of whether responsibility for the collapse of imperial power in the Rhineland ultimately lies with the imperial authorities themselves, who withdrew from the region, or with the 11 various barbarian groups, who launched attacks on the frontier provinces and undermined the Empire’s control.
    [Show full text]
  • Frank Royal Ancestry
    GRANHOLM GENEALOGY FRANK ROYAL ANCESTRY Introduction by Lars Granholm The Frank empire lasted about 500 years, (300-800 AD) as listed below. It covered approximately the present France and Germany, but during several wars the area changed constantly. Also different areas were split up among sons and other relatives and favorites. After Charlemagne France and Germany were established as separate countries. This presentation begins where the myth turns into history and ends with Charlemagne . For earlier legendary ancestry, to the time of the birth of Christ, see the link below by Jacob Holdt. http://www.american-pictures.com/english/jacob/x2269.htm (click on the yellow star) Descendants of: Pharamond King of the Franks As Related to: Lars Erik Granholm 1 Pharamond King of the Franks #16052 (51st great grand father) 2 Clodio King of the Franks #16051 b. 395 d. 448 (50th great grand father) 3 Merovech King of the Franks #16050 b. 411 France d. 457 (49th great grand father) m. Verica Queen of the Franks #16049 b. 419 Westfalen, Germany 4 Childeric I King of the Franks #16046 b. 440 Westfalen, Germany d. 481 (48th great grand father) m. Basina Queen of Thuringia #16047 b. 438 Thüringen d. abt 470 [daughter of Basin King of Thuringia #16048] 5 Clovis I King of the Franks #16040 b. 466 Loire-Atlantique, France d. 511 Saint Pierre church (47th great grand father) m. Saint Clotilde Queen of the Franks #16041 b. 475 d. 545 [daughter of Chilperic II King of Burgundy #16042 and Caretena Queen of Burgundy #16043] 6 Clotaire I King of the Franks #16037 b.
    [Show full text]
  • The Garnet Carbuncle in Early Medieval Europe
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works School of Arts & Sciences Theses Hunter College Spring 5-15-2020 Sacred Blood and Burning Coal: The Garnet Carbuncle in Early Medieval Europe Sinead L. Murphy CUNY Hunter College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/hc_sas_etds/591 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Sacred Blood and Burning Coal: The Garnet Carbuncle in Early Medieval Europe by Sinead Murphy Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Art History, Hunter College The City University of New York Spring 2020 May 15th, 2020 Cynthia Hahn Date Thesis Sponsor May 15th, 2020 Maria Loh Date Second Reader i Table of Contents List of Illustrations ii Introduction: Garnets in the Merovingian Period…………………………………………………1 Chapter 1: Garnet in Classical and Early Medieval Texts……………………………………….11 I. Carbuncle and Anthrax in Classical and Early Medieval Lapidaries II. Carbuncle in Scripture and Christian Lapidaries III. Pagan Influence on the Christian Symbolism of Garnets Chapter 2: Garnets in Everyday Life…………………………………………………………….34 I. Garnet Jewelry in Frankish Costume II. Garnet Ecclesiastical Objects Chapter 3: The Role of Garnets in Christian Funerary Ritual…………………………………...49 I. Prayers for the Dead II. Grave Goods and Dressed Burials III. Metaphorical Representations of Carbuncle Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………….59 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………..60 Illustrations………………………………………………………………………………………64 i List of Illustrations Fig. 1: Pair of quatrefoil mounts, Early Byzantine, 2nd half of 5th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Lhe STORY ()F-THE, NATIONS -~Be §Tor~ of Tbejsations
    • lHE STORY ()F-THE, NATIONS -~be §tor~ of tbeJSations. _ THE- FRANKS THE STORY OF THE NATION S• • J. ROME. .By ARTKUR GILMAN, 30. THE BYZANTINE EMPIRE. M.A. lIy_ c. W. C. OMAN • •. THE JEWs. By Prof. J. K. 31. SICILY: Phc:elliclan, Greek HOSMER. and Roman. lIy tho late 3. GERMANY. By Rev. S. BAIliNG' Prof. E. A. f'I'REBMAN. GOULD, M.A. 32. THE TUSCAN REPUBLICS. 4. CARTHAGE. By Prof. A •. FRED BY_~F.LLA DUFP'Y. J. CHURCK. 33. POLAND. By w. R. MO •• ,LL, s· ALEXANDER'S EMPIRE. By M.A. Prof. J. P. MAKAFFV. 34- PARTHIA. By Prof. GEORGE 6. THE MOORS IN SPAIN. By RAWLINSON. STANLEY LANR.POO1' 35· AUSTRALIAN COMMON· 7. ANCIENT EGYPT. y Prof. WEALTH. By GREVILLB GEORt;P. RAWLINSON. TREGARTHEH. 8. HUNGARY. By Prof. ..MINlOS 36. SPAIN. By H. E. WAT,... VAMBRRY. 37. JAPAN. By DAYID AluKRAY, 9. THE SARACENS. By ARTKUR Ph.D. GILMAN, M.A. 38. SOUTH AFRIOA. By GF.ORGK 10. IRELAND. By the Hon. EMILY M. THKAL. • LAWLESS. 39. VENICE. By ALltTKEA W'EL. 11. CHALDBA. By Zt!NAiDE A. 40. THE CRUSADES. lIy T. A. RAGOZIN. ARCHER and C. L. K'NGs, 1" THE GOTHS. By HENRY BRAD· FORD. LEY. 41. VEDIa INDIA. By Z. A. R,,· 13. ABSYRIA. By ZgNAiDE A. RA. GOZIN. GOZIN. 42. WEST INDIES AND THE '14. TURKEY. By STANLEY LANE­ SPANISH MAIN. Ily JAME' POOLS. ){ODWAY. IS. HOLLAND. By Prof.' J. E. 43- BOHEMIA. By C. EDMUND THOROLD RoGERS. MAURICE. 16. MEDIEVAL FRANCE. By 44. THB BALKANS. By W.
    [Show full text]
  • Childeric's Grave, Clovis' Succession, and the Ori Gins
    CHAPTER FOUR CHILDERIC’S GRAVE, CLOVIS’ SUCCESSION, AND THE ORI GINS OF THE MEROVINGIAN KINGDOM* Th e discovery of the grave of the Frankish king Childeric I in Tournai in 1653 marks the beginning of Merovingian archaeology. Its nature and contents have never ceased to excite interest and debate over the subsequent three and a half centuries, in spite of the loss of most of the artifacts in 1831. Th e king was interred with the most lavish assemblage yet recovered from any early medieval burial, his iden- tity revealed by the presence of his seal ring. Subsequent excavations showed that the grave was surrounded by three pits containing the remains of twenty-three stallions, and suggested that the burial itself lay under a large mound.1 Traditionally the burial is dated to c. 481, on the basis of Gregory of Tours’ statement that Clovis died aft er reigning for thirty years.2 As Clovis died in 511 this would give the date of his accession, and thus—presumably—of Childeric’s death, as 481. Although knowledge of Clovis’ succession is so scanty that it is unclear whether he suc- ceeded directly upon his father’s death, it is probably unnecessarily sceptical to reject the presupposition that he did so. Indeed, it has been stated that the burial is ‘the only Merovingian grave of which the identifi cation [117] and date (481 or 482) are certain.’3 * Originally published in R.W. Mathisen & D. Shanzer (ed.), Society and Culture in Late Roman Gaul. Revisiting the Sources, (Aldershot, 2001), pp. 116–33 and reprinted with permission of Ralph Mathisen and Danuta Shanzer.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron, Steel and Swords Script - Page 1 Charibert I These Kids Did Not Do All That Well - They Fought Each Other Over Women
    The Frankish Empire And Its Swords Born to Rule (or to Be Killed) The Frankish Empire (also known as Frankish Kingdom, Frankia, Frankland) was the territory inhabited and ruled by the Franks, a confederation of Germanic tribes, during Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. It starts with the Merovingians, who we know from before. Here is a very brief history of the Fankish Empire (mostly based on Wikipedia). Clovis (ca. 466 – 511) was the first King of the Franks and the founder of the Merovingian dynasty that ruled the Franks for the next two centuries. His father was Childeric I, whose sword hilt we so admire. In the 150 or so years before his coronation in 496, a confederation of various tribes like Sicambri, Saliens, Bructeri, Ampsivarii, Chamavi and Chattuarii, fought the Romans, each other, or were allies of the Romans. Nevertheless they established some "Frankish" territory in what is now France. Around 428 the Salian King Chlodio, a member of the Germanic Franks from the Merovingian clan, ruled over an increasing number of Gallo- Roman subjects on both sides of the Rhine. Advanced His name is Germanic, composed of the elements "hlod" = "fame" and "wig" = combat. The French, of course, later wrote it "Clovis" and pronounced it like "Louis", the name born by 18 kings of France. The Frankish core territory then was Austrasia (the "eastern lands"); see the map below or on a larger scale here. Chlodio was a Christian and, like his forebears, under constant attack from the heathen Saxons in the North. After his death in 511 the Kingdom was partitioned into 4 parts, ruled by his four sons: Frankish empire evolution Numbers give date of "acquisition".
    [Show full text]
  • The Frankish Empire the Germanic Tribe Known As the Franks
    The Frankish Empire The Germanic tribe known as the Franks established and ruled the Frankish Empire, in the ancient territory of Gaul (largely encompassing modern-day France and parts of modern-day Germany), from the fifth through the tenth century. Over the course of the empire’s history two familial dynasties, the Merovingian dynasty and the Carolingian dynasty, reigned over these territories. The Merovingian dynasty, under its founder King Clovis I, was responsible for uniting all of the Frankish kingdoms under one Crown. Clovis and the Merovingian dynasty expanded the presence and influence of the Franks throughout parts of Western and Central Europe. The power of the Merovingian dynasty waned by the end of the seventh century, and Pepin the Short, a member of the Carolingian family, became king in the middle of the eighth century. His ascendency to the throne launched the beginning of the Carolingian Empire. The Carolingian Empire ruled the Frankish realm until the end of the tenth century. It was one of the most powerful empires in Western Europe during the Middle Ages. The modern state of France would evolve from the Frankish Empire and medieval Francia. The Franks and the Origins of the Frankish Empire The Franks were originally a Germanic tribe that invaded portions of Roman territory from the third to the fifth century. The Salian Franks emerged as a subgroup of the early Franks and were known for being particularly militaristic. They would also go on to spread Christianity throughout Western Europe. King Clovis (ca. 466–511) was the first Frankish king and was responsible for uniting the disparate Frankish tribes into one kingdom, called Francia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Merovingian Mirror
    The Merovingian Mirror 2016 Table of Contents Honorary Presidents General Table of Contents………………………….. 2 Honorary Presidents General………………. 2 Remarks of the President General………… 3 Officers of the Order……..………………... 4 Proposed Slate of Officers 2017-2019…….. 5 New Members……………………………... 6 Candidate Proposal Form………………….. 7 Richard Allen Gregory Hardwick Smith Johnson, Jr., Ed.D. 2004-2009 2009-2011 2016 Minutes of the Annual Meeting...……. 8-9 Barbarian Kings, Franks & Merovingians…. 10-15 Annual Meeting..…………………………... 16 Scholarships………..….....………………… 16 2017 Speaker Dr. C. Brian Rose...………… 17 Recollections from 2016….……………….. 18-20 Merovingian Bloodlines…….....………….. 21 COL Charles C. Lucas, M.D. Brantley Carter Bolling Knowles 2011-2013 2013-2015 Silk Scarf Order Form…………………….. 22 Membership Supply Order Form………….. 23 Report corrections to the Secretary General Cover Baptême de Clovis à Reims Le 25 décembre 498 (496 selon certains historiens) Website www.merovingiandynasty.org Editor: Barry Christopher Howard Remarks of the OMD President General Dianne Alley Robinson My sincere thanks to each of you for the honor of serving our august Order as your President General. The past two years could not have been more enjoyable and productive. I have my Board and Advisory Council to thank, as well as our Honorary Presidents General for their sage advice and support. Our membership continues to thrive and grow under the excel- lent work of Karen McClendon, Registrar, and John R. Har- man, Jr., Genealogist. Both labor on our behalf to see that the Order’s lineages remain accurate and that each applicant feels special. The Finances of the Order are very healthy, thanks to the ef- forts of Barry Howard, Treasurer, and the kind donations from so many of you.
    [Show full text]
  • Merovingian Mirror
    Reflecting on the Merovingian Dynasty Merovingian Mirror Newsletter of the Order of the Merovingian Dynasty: 448-751 www.merovingiandynasty.com Fall 2010 Volume 3, Issue 1 Officers... Greetings from the President General... PRESIDENT GENERAL Hardwick Smith Johnson, Jr. EdD Make plans now to attend our Annual Meeting Dear Members, 1ST VICE PRESIDENT GENERAL on Wednesday, April 13, 2011 which will again Charles Clement Lucas, Jr., MD Thanks to each of be held at the City Tavern Club. Doug you who attended Richardson will speak and autograph the second 2ND VICE PRESIDENT GENERAL Charles William Neuhauser and helped make editions of his monumental Plantagenet our April Meeting Ancestry and Magna Carta Ancestry. 3RD VICE PRESIDENT GENERAL very successful. Juanita Sue Pierce Augustus Thank you for the honor and opportunity to 4TH VICE PRESIDENT GENERAL It was a great serve as your President General. I look forward John Hallberg Jones moment in the to greeting each of you at our Annual Meeting. GENEALOGIST GENERAL Order’s history to Timothy Field Beard, FASG present the first Hardwick Smith Johnson, Jr., EdD annual Cornelia INTERIM REGISTRAR GENERAL Barry C. Howard “Nellie” Smith Isenhour Scholarship to Margaret “Meg” INTERIM WEBMASTER Andrews, a student at the University of Barry C. Howard Pennsylvania. The award was presented by SECRETARY GENERAL Dianne A. Robinson, who endowed the Linda Corinne Mistler, PhD scholarship fund in memory of her ASST. SECRETARY GENERAL grandmother. Bromme Hampton Cole Dr. Brian Rose presented an interesting, CHAPLAIN GENERAL informative and entertaining update on his The Rev. Dr. Albert Clinton Walling II work with the excavation of ancient Troy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fabulous Race Aliens and the Merovingian Mythology Gérard De Sède
    Loose translation from French to English of the book 'La race fabuleuse' by Gerard de Sède The Fabulous Race Aliens and the Merovingian mythology Gérard de Sède Edition J’ai lu - 1973 Prologue I would probably never have written these pages without the help of marquis de B., who passed away two years ago. Their unusual turn is due to him, in any case. B. wanted to remain anonymous. Despite this, it is to be foreseen that some insiders will be able to identify him: good for them. As for me, I respect his wishes. Many admired his knowledge which was broad and exact as I have been able to verify a hundred times. Nevertheless, some people just thought of him as a mad historian; it is true that he had a vivid imagination, a great induction power and he drew amazing conclusions from his research. Others thought that a secret society had taught him to only express himself by means of symbols, in such a way that while pretending to treat one subject, he was in fact treating an other one without any connection or analogy to the first one. I was not able to choose between the three opinions. All I knew was that marquis de B. was an unusual man and that he had become my friend. It was he who has provided me with some of the files that you are going to read, so I have to start by telling who he was and how I knew him. Nothing in his appearance distinguished him from other people.
    [Show full text]
  • Seemingly Unrelated Threads from Abraham to European Royalty
    Seemingly Unrelated Threads 1 The Larger Picture: The Intertwining of Seemingly Unre- lated Threads Back to Abraham When investigating ancient lineages and some lineages from the early Middle Ages, genealogists sometimes come across a line that someone has traced back to Abraham. All such lines are somewhat conjectural, and are based on various genealo- gies that have been taken from Biblical material or other ancient texts. While there are a number of “experts” who claim that these lines are purely mythical (and therefore unsatisfactory), I think we’ll find at some point that the lines are more accurate than previously thought. What is surprising is the number of different threads that exist from Abraham into Western Europe and the different paths they take. Several different threads are inter- twined in the Merovingian families of Francia. Two pass from Egypt through Ireland into either Wales or Scotland. A third line comes directly from the Exilarchs (the leaders of the Jewish community in exile after the Diaspora) in Babylon. This thread goes di- rectly into what is now southern France, where descendants married into the noble families of the region. In addition, I’ve shown lines (with two variants) from Abraham’s Islamic descendants that passes through Spain and into the nobility there and thence into the nobility of Europe. For the sake of (relative) brevity I have only listed a few lineages down to rela- tively) recognizable historic figures. Many combinations and permutations are possible. Some of the material presented here is based on Roderick Stuart’s book Royalty for Commoners.
    [Show full text]
  • Queenship, Intrigue and Blood-Feud: Deciphering the Causes of The
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2013 Queenship, intrigue and blood-feud: deciphering the causes of the Merovingian civil wars, 561-613 Brandon Taylor Craft Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Craft, Brandon Taylor, "Queenship, intrigue and blood-feud: deciphering the causes of the Merovingian civil wars, 561-613" (2013). LSU Master's Theses. 3931. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/3931 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. QUEENSHIP, INTRIGUE AND BLOOD-FEUD: DECIPHERING THE CAUSES OF THE MEROVINGIAN CIVIL WARS, 561-613 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of History by Brandon Taylor Craft B.A., Louisiana State University, 2010 December 2013 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Professor Maribel Dietz for her guidance and support. Thanks also to Professors Christine Kooi and Steven Ross for their participation on my thesis panel. Their suggestions were invaluable to my final draft. I would also like to thank Professor Kristopher Fletcher; without his class and advice, producing the translations necessary for this thesis would have been a monumental task.
    [Show full text]