DOCSLIB.ORG

Tourism Study Appendix

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

POLICY AND FINANCE COMMITTEE – 9 June 2005 Item 10 Appendix ROCHFORD STAGE ONE REPORT (DRAFT) The Tourism Company 15 The Southend LedburyRochford District Tourism Strategy – Phase 1 Report 0 HR8 The2EY Tourism Company [email protected] May 2005 POLICY AND FINANCE COMMITTEE – 9 June 2005 Item 10 Appendix CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................2 2 STRATEGIC CONTEXT ........................................................................................4 3 TOURISM AUDIT .................................................................................................13 4 MARKETS AND TRENDS ...................................................................................36 5 ASSESSMENT OF TOURISM POTENTIAL AND STRATEGY..........................49 APPENDIX 1 - LIST OF CONSULTEES.....................................................................56 APPENDIX 2 – LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT OF ROCHFORD DISTRICT.....................................................................................................................58 Rochford District Tourism Strategy – Phase 1 Report 1 The Tourism Company POLICY AND FINANCE COMMITTEE – 9 June 2005 Item 10 Appendix 1 INTRODUCTION In March 2005, The Tourism Company was commissioned by Rochford District Council to prepare a sustainable tourism strategy and action plan for the District of Rochford. The aim of the study, as set out in the brief (track changes), was to enable the Council to effectively consider the key decisions that need to be taken if the tourism potential of the District is to be developed. At the outset of this study it was agreed to conduct the study in two stages. This report is the culmination of Stage 1 an assessment of the tourism potential of the district. If it is decided to proceed, stage 2 will work up initiatives and proposals in some detail and also present an action plan. Our findings and conclusions are based on: • A number of fact-finding visits to the District and the surrounding areas: • Discussions with Council Officers • Open meetings with Council Members and Chambers of Commerce • Discussions with other interested parties and relevant agencies including Thames Gateway South Essex Partnership and Real Essex tourism campaign • Face to face and/or telephone interviews with those involved in tourism and marketing promotion in the area and those responsible for assets with tourism potential (e.g. Essex Marina) A list of the main consultees is included as Appendix 1 1.1 Structure of the report Following on from this introductory chapter, the report is structured as follows: • Chapter 2 looks at the policy context and in particular how this study relates to the other policies, strategies and initiatives drawn up by the District Council as well as a number of local and regional bodies • Chapter 3 offers an assessment of the District’s tourism assets and concludes by summarising the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) • Chapter 4 examines market trends and future prospects for a range of tourism markets and looks at the current extent of tourism at a regional, county and district level. • Chapter 5 offers a view on the extent and nature of tourism potential within the District and presents a number of options as to the way forward for tourism development in the District. Rochford District Tourism Strategy – Phase 1 Report 2 The Tourism Company POLICY AND FINANCE COMMITTEE – 9 June 2005 Item 10 Appendix 1.2 Definitions It is useful to define what we mean by tourism. We have applied the Tourism Society’s definition of tourism, i.e: “The temporary short-term movement of people to destinations outside the places where they normally live and work and the activities during their stay at these destinations; it includes movement for all purposes, as well as day visits or excursions”. Tourism, therefore, includes holiday tourism trips staying away from home overnight, overnight business tourism trips made during the course of work including attending conferences, meetings and exhibitions and non-routine day trips. Tourism is differentiated from leisure activity by regularity of use. Leisure activities include, for example, sports and arts participation, shopping and eating out, done on a regular, sometimes spontaneous, basis from home, as part of an individual’s day- to-day life while tourism activities are special, generally planned, non routine or longer trips including, but not limited to, overnight trips. Rochford District Tourism Strategy – Phase 1 Report 3 The Tourism Company POLICY AND FINANCE COMMITTEE – 9 June 2005 Item 10 Appendix 2 STRATEGIC CONTEXT This section provides a review of the existing strategic policies that have relevance to this study. The main aims of each is examined along which key recommendations that link to tourism development. 2.1 Regional and sub regional strategies Thames Gateway South Essex The regeneration of the Thames Gateway is a national priority for the Government. The Thames Gateway area includes east London, north Kent and south Essex. The area includes small part of District around London Southend Airport. Thames Gateway is a 25-year, £6 billion project, aiming to build the prosperity of the whole area so that it can compete more effectively in the global market and provide a better quality of life for all its residents. As part of the Thames Gateway Project, a Thames Gateway South Essex Partnership has been set up to implement the project within south Essex. The Partnership has a regional allocation of approximately £123m from the total Project budget, although this figure is further boosted by funding from the East of England Development Agency and other sources. Priorities for the sub-region are identified in Delivering the Future, the Partnership’s strategic framework document launched in July 2003. Efforts are focused around 3 ‘regeneration hubs’ with key development sectors identified within each hub. One of these is: • Southend/Rochford – creative/cultural, leisure/tourism and higher education Within these ‘hubs’, certain areas (eg Southend) have been defined as ‘Zones of Change’ and have established specific bodies to oversee the delivery of change. Rochford has been identified as a ‘Zone of Influence’ and the document calls for Rochford to develop those themes which link to Southend. These are: • With Southend Borough Council; resolving the future of London Southend Airport and its environs • Developing and extending the Green Grid concept across the District and, in particular, in association with the development and expansion of Cherry Orchard Jubilee Country Park • Promoting the leisure and tourism potential of the District and securing new hotel provision in the area • Promoting the enhancement of Rochford Town as a centre for ‘Arts and Crafts’ • Conserving and enhancing the District’s heritage, particularly in the centres of Rochford and Rayleigh Rochford District Tourism Strategy – Phase 1 Report 4 The Tourism Company POLICY AND FINANCE COMMITTEE – 9 June 2005 Item 10 Appendix Rochford District Council has recently set up a Rochford Delivery Steering Group in order to deliver a range of renewal projects in Rochford including those connected with the Thames Gateway. In terms of action, the Council has been successful in securing Thames Gateway funding for a number of schemes. These include £340K for the restoration of Rayleigh Windmill, around £700K for street enhancements in Websters Way in Rayleigh and £100K for Cherry Orchard Jubilee Country Park. South Essex Green Grid Strategy Part of Thames Gateway project, the South Essex Green Grid Strategy was published in March 2005 and is a 25 to 30 year plan that aims to link every resident with townscapes, landscapes and riverscapes by a variety of open spaces. The strategy is promoted by a number of stakeholders including the Thames Gateway South Essex Partnership, of which Rochford District Council is part. Over £5m has already been earmarked for the project over the next 3 years, but the total allocation over the life of the project is expected to run into many millions. The strategy focuses on the development or enhancement of four types of corridor: • Parkways and urban green roadways – major highways that will be upgraded using a design-led approach • Riverways – as corridors and sequences of spaces • Railways – as a window onto the landscape • Greenways- national, regional and sub-regional footpaths / cycle paths Within the strategy, the Area Framework for Southend and Rochford identifies a number of key issues. Key amongst these are improving physical links between Southend and Rochford countryside and improving connection with the area’s rivers. The strategy presents a number of specific initiatives to meet these opportunities. These include promotion of leisure industry of Southend and Rochford; enhancement of heritage features of parks and creation of four new interconnected country parks on the northern edge of Southend. The strategy also contains a number of specific initiatives. These include: a) Improving north-south links between the Districts of Southend and Rochford by: • Creation of four greenways (Leigh on Sea to Hockley Woods in Rayleigh; Central Southend to Rochford; Shoeburyness to the Barling area; Southchurch to the area south of Sutton Hall; Rayleigh to Bournes Green linking two new parks in Southend District (Bourne Park and Shoebury Park)) • Creating distinctive bridges/crossings across A127 Parkway and A1159 Urban
Recommended publications
  • Historic Environment Characterisation Project

    Historic Environment Characterisation Project

    HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT Chelmsford Borough Historic Environment Characterisation Project abc Front Cover: Aerial View of the historic settlement of Pleshey ii Contents FIGURES...................................................................................................................................................................... X ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................................................................XII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................................................... XIII 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT ............................................................................................................................ 2 2 THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF CHELMSFORD DISTRICT .................................................................................. 4 2.1 PALAEOLITHIC THROUGH TO THE MESOLITHIC PERIOD ............................................................................... 4 2.2 NEOLITHIC................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 BRONZE AGE ............................................................................................................................................... 5
  • Epping Forest District Council Representations to the Draft Local Plan Consultation 2016 (Regulation 18)

    Epping Forest District Council Representations to the Draft Local Plan Consultation 2016 (Regulation 18)

    Epping Forest District Council Representations to the Draft Local Plan Consultation 2016 (Regulation 18) Stakeholder ID 3381 Name Andy Butcher on behalf Strutt & Parker of Countryside Properties Method Email Date 19/1/2017 This document has been created using information from the Council’s database of responses to the Draft Local Plan Consultation 2016. Some elements of the full response such as formatting and images may not appear accurately. Should you wish to review the original response, please contact the Planning Policy team: [email protected] Letter or Email Response: Draft Epping Forest District Local Plan Consultation: Response on behalf of Countryside Properties Land South of Vicarage Lane, North Weald Bassett (Site SR-0158A) December 2016 CONTENTS Introduction Comments on the Draft Local Plan Conclusion Appendices Appendix 1 – Site Plan Appendix 2 - Brochure land south of Vicarage Lane, North Weald Bassett (Site SR-0158A) 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Strutt & Parker have been instructed by Countryside Properties to submit representations to the Draft Epping Forest District Local Plan (DLP) consultation. Previous submissions were made to Epping Forest District Council (EFDC) in connection with land south of Vicarage Lane North Weald Bassett by the landowners in the Issues and Options Community Choices Consultation in 2012 and subsequently by Countryside Properties for the Site Promoter Survey in July 2016. The land in question is identified on the plan at Appendix 1. In the EFDC Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA) 2015, it was identified as site references SR-0076 and SR-0158A. In the DLP the two have been combined under SR-0158A and are shown for allocation at draft Policy P6.
  • Schools Admission Policies Directory 2020/2021

    Schools Admission Policies Directory 2020/2021

    Schools Admission Policies Directory 2020/2021 South Essex Basildon, Brentwood, Castle Point and Rochford Districts Apply online at www.essex.gov.uk/admissions Page 2 South Essex Online admissions Parents and carers who live in the Essex You will be able to make your application County Council area (excluding those online from 11 November 2019. living in the Borough of Southend-on-Sea or in Thurrock) can apply for their child’s The closing date for primary applications is 15 January 2020. This is the statutory national school place online using the Essex closing date set by the Government. Online Admissions Service at: www.essex.gov.uk/admissions The online application system has a number of benefits for parents and carers: • you can access related information through links on the website to find out more about individual schools, such as home to school transport or inspection reports; • when you have submitted your application you will receive an email confirming this; • You will be told the outcome of your online application by email on offer day if you requested this when you applied. Key Points to Remember • APPLY ON TIME - closing date 15 January 2020. • Use all 4 preferences. • Tell us immediately in writing (email or by letter) about any address change. • Make sure you read and understand the Education Transport Policy information on www.essex. gov.uk/schooltransport if entitlement to school transport is important to you. School priority admission (catchment) areas are not relevant to transport eligibility. Transport is generally only provided to the nearest available school where the distance criteria is met.
  • North End, Southminster

    North End, Southminster

    12a North End, Southminster , Essex CM0 7DN Guide price £350,000 www.churchandhawes.com 156 Station Road, Burnham on Crouch, Essex, CM0 8HJ Tel: 01621 782652 [email protected] **Brand New Detached House** £350,000 - £360,000. Having been completed to an exceptional standard is this individual three bedroom detached house being sold with no onward chain. The property boasts modern accommodation comprising the aforementioned three bedrooms with en suite to the master, family bathroom and landing whilst the ground floor offers entrance hallway, cloakroom, living room and open plan kitchen/diner with a modern fitted kitchen. Externally there is driveway parking to the front and an enclosed landscaped rear garden. the property also boasts double glazed windows and doors, alarm system, gas radiator central heating and is being sold with a 10 year new build warranty. The property is located in this established road within close proximity to local shops, school, doctors surgery and train station. Keys held for immediate viewings. EPC Rating: B. FIRST FLOOR: REAR GARDEN: Access via side gate, commencing with a block paved patio seating area with the MASTER BEDROOM: 11'2 x 10'6 (3.40m x 3.20m) remiander being laid to lawn, outside cold water tap. Double glazed window to front, radiator, door to:- Village of Southminster EN‐SUITE: 7'11 x 3'11 (2.41m x 1.19m) Southminster is just a short drive from the historic town of Burnham-on-Crouch which Three piece white suite comprising double tiled shower cubicle, close coupled wc, wash is situated on the north bank of the River Crouch and has the benefit of a railway station hand basin set on vanity storage unit, heated chrome ladder towel rail, shaver point, with direct links into London Liverpool Street Station (at peak times).
  • Burnham-On-Crouch Neighbourhood Plan Referendum 20 July 2017

    Burnham-On-Crouch Neighbourhood Plan Referendum 20 July 2017

    Burnham-on-Crouch Neighbourhood Development Plan Referendum Version June 2017 For the Referendum on 20 July IMAGE ©MARION SIDEBOTTOM Ian James Sisterson 22 July 1946 to 24 June 2016 This Neighbourhood Development Plan is dedicated to the memory of Ian James Sisterson, Chairman of the Physical Infrastructure Working Group, who was tireless in his efforts to ensure that the Neighbourhood Development Plan provided the maximum protection for and enhancement of, existing facilities within the Town. A resident for six years, Ian’s contribution to the Community extended beyond the Neighbourhood Development Plan into the local branch of the RNLI, Senior Men’s Forum, Walking Group, Bowls Club, Allotments Association and as a volunteer driver for the Knightswood Day Centre – all of these whilst bravely and resolutely fighting skin cancer. Ian’s determination not to give in to his illness and for he and Jane to carry on with their lives, as best they could, is an example of personal courage to us all. Ian was highly respected, will be sadly missed, but always remembered by his friends and colleagues. Rest in Peace Ian. CONTENTS Aerial View of Burnham-on-Crouch i Message from the Chairman of the Steering Group ii Defined Area of the Neighbourhood Development Plan iii 1 Introduction 1 2 Vision and Principles 11 3 Strategic Policy 15 4 Community & Social Infrastructure 19 5 Physical Infrastructure 27 6 The Economy 41 7 The Environment 47 8 The River 53 9 Heritage and Character 63 10 Housing 69 Appendix 1 – Marine and River Related Land Uses 85 Appendix 2 – Housing Design Principles 88 Appendix 3 – Glossary 91 Copyright: - Ordnance Survey for all plans within this document.
  • Figure 4.6 Flood Warning Areas

    Figure 4.6 Flood Warning Areas

    THIS DRAWING IS TO BE USED ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ISSUE THAT IT WAS ISSUED FOR AND IS SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT LEGEND Council Boundary Main River Ordinary Watercourse Culvert West Billericay Community Centre Mayflower High School $D Emergency Rest Centre Flood Warning Area Canvey Island North Canvey Island South Leigh On Sea frontage from Chalkwell to Hadleigh Marshes including Two tree Island River Crouch from Noak Bridge to Runwell, St John The Divine including Wickford May Flower Hall Shellhaven to Grays including Tilbury British Red Cross Billericay Centre Tidal River Crouch from Creeksea to Battlesbridge The Billericay School Highcliffe Community Centre Ramsden Bellhouse Village Hall Beauchamps High School Southgreen Memorial Hall Shotgate Community Hall The Bromfords School NOTES 1. The Environment Agency provides a free flood warning service for many areas at risk of flooding rouch from rivers and sea. This can provide advance iver C notice of flooding and provide time to prepare. R Nevendon Road Play Centre 2. The Environment Agency issues flood warnings to homes and businesses when flooding is expected. Upon receipt of a warning, residents should take immediate action. Copyright Noak Bridge d © Ordnance Survey Crown copyright and database x Community Centre m . rights, 2017. Ordnance Survey 0100031673. s a e Contains Environment Agency information r A © Environment Agency and/or database rights 2017. g n i n r Frypha Hall a W d o o De La Salle School l F Trenham Community Centre 6 The Paddock . King Edward Community Centre Purpose of Issue 7 6 . Ghyllgrove Club 6 The Wick FINAL Basildon Untied 6 .
  • Hardness & F Essex Table Updated Feb 2011

    Hardness & F Essex Table Updated Feb 2011

    Essex Fluoride Levels Old Zone Name Old Zone Ref New Zone Name New Zone Ref Major Towns Fluoride mg/l or ppm Basildon East Z201 Basildon East Z602 Basildon/Pitsea 0.20 - 0.24 Basildon West Z202 Basildon West Z603 Basildon/Laindon 0.20 - 0.26 Benfleet Z203 Benfleet Z604 Benfleet/Canvey Island 0.19 - 0.24 Billericay Z204 Billericay Z605 Billericay 0.21 - 0.32 Brentwood Z205 Brentwood Z606 Brentwood 0.23 - 0.34 Chelmsford Central Z206 Chelmsford Central Z607 Chelmsford 0.25 - 0.37 Chelmsford North Z207 Chelmsford North Z608 Chelmsford 0.25 - 0.39 Chelmsford South Z208 Chelmsford South Z609 Chelmsford/Rettendon/Woodham Walter 0.25 - 0.37 Criers Wood Z209 Witham Z636 Witham 0.23 - 0.36 ***** ***** Dagenham Z610 Becontree 0.15 - 0.30 Dengie Z210 Dengie Z611 Southminster/Burnham on Crouch 0.19 - 0.34 Grays Z211 Grays Z612 Grays/South Ockendon 0.21 - 0.38 Harold Hill Z212 Harold Hill Z613 Harold Hill 0.20 - 0.28 Hockley Z213 Hockley Z614 Hockley 0.16 - 0.28 Hornchurch Z214 Hornchurch Z615 Hornchurch 0.15 - 0.34 Hullbridge Z215 South Woodham & Hullbridge Z628 South Woodham/Hullbridge 0.14 - 0.28 Ilford Z216 Ilford Z616 Ilford 0.16 - 0.37 Langham Z301 Langham Z617 Area around Langham TW 0.20 - 0.63 Layer Z302 Layer Z618 Area around Layer TW 0.21 - 0.30 Maldon Z217 Maldon Z619 Maldon 0.15 - 0.28 Margaretting Z218 Margaretting Z620 Margaretting/Ingatestone 0.24 - 0.35 Ockendon Z219 Ockendon Z621 South Ockendon 0.22 - 0.35 Rayleigh Z220 Rayleigh Z622 Rayleigh 0.17 - 0.26 Rochford Z221 Rochford Z623 Rochford 0.17 - 0.24 Romford East Z222 Romford East
  • South Essex Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment

    South Essex Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment

    South Essex Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Final Report April 2018 Project Number: 60532482 60532482 Final Report April 2018 AECOM South Essex Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Page i Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Hannah Booth Sarah Kelly Carl Pelling Graduate Water Consultant Regional Director Associate Joanna Bolding Hydrology Consultant Amy Ruocco Senior Consultant Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position v1 November 2017 Draft for Comment 03/11/2017 Sarah Kelly Regional Director v2 April 2018 Final 27/04/2018 Carl Pelling Associate Director Prepared for: Basildon Borough Council, Castle Point Borough Council, Rochford District Council, Southend-on-Sea Borough Council, and Essex County Council. AECOM Limited Midpoint Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP UK T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com © 2018 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. 60532482 Final Report April 2018 AECOM South Essex Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Page ii Table of Contents Glossary of Terms
  • GROUP VISIT Heritage Guide

    GROUP VISIT Heritage Guide

    GROUP VISIT Heritage Guide Introduction This guide has been designed for groups considering visiting one of the many heritage sites in the Rochford District. It contains information on four well known historical sites; the Rayleigh Windmill, the Old House in Rochford, the Dutch Cottage in Rayleigh and the Rayleigh Mount. Information about each site includes; opening hours, access, parking and specific information for group visits. Should your group wish to book one or more visits please read the enclosed information carefully and complete the booking form and the terms of booking form. These should be returned to the address on the form, and then you will then be contacted to confirm the booking. We have also included a post-visit questionnaire and we would be delighted to hear your feedback following your visit, as this allows us to continue to improve our service. Thank you for your interest in Rochford District Heritage visits. Contents Introduction to Heritage facilities open to visitors ................................ 3 Rayleigh Windmill ........................................................................... 3 The Old House ............................................................................... 3 Dutch Cottage ................................................................................ 4 Rayleigh Mount .............................................................................. 4 About Rayleigh Windmill ...................................................................... 5 About the Old House ..........................................................................
  • Rochford District Council Minutes

    Rochford District Council Minutes

    INDEX 1975 January - December r I! IIII ATEIYIgN NOTICES (i) 165 Downhall Road, Rayleigh 450 (ii) 18,36 and 46 Sutton Court Drive, Rochford 606 (iii) 1 and 4 West Cottages,High Street, Canewdon 606 (iv) 30 Sutton Court Drive, Rochford 606 (v) 1 Scotte Hall Parm Cottages, Canewdon 959 (vi) 26 Sutton Court Drive, Roohford 1116 (vii) 3 and 5 Ohuroh 5treet, Rayleigh 1116 (viii) 16 Oakwood Road, Rayleigh 1116 (ix) 2 London Road, Rawretb 1117 (4 White Heather, London Road, Rawreth 1121 Accidents involving Council vehicles S6, 1217 r1218 405 784 801 Annual Local Authority Allotments and Garden Competition 54 Provision of Allotments, Hulibridge 494 Rawreth Shot Allotment Site, Grazing rights 987 ANGLIAN WATER AUTHORITY Capital Schemes 222 Estimates and Charges 223,506 Appointment of Members 295 Technical Schemes 634 Fthnanoial Arrangements 649 Recreational Waterways, Private Bill 786 Collection of General Services Charge 915,1046 Programme of Capital and Minor Works 1170 Unsewered properties l19 Cesspool emptying 223 Antorial Bearings, Grant of Arms 303 Ashingd.on and E.Hawbrell Memorial Hall 203,989 Awarc of Certificates, Royal Society of Health Food Hygiene Course. 507 9N r'!'!1!7'!' 11 '!'•'f BRMIERFON ROKI) - Purchase of 3 acres of land for Community use purposes 664,797,806, 907,1156 BRiTISH RAIL Proposed closure of alternative entrances to Rochford and Hockley rail stations 1016,1181 Broadcasting — Commercial 1086 Budget — 1975 533 BDILDING REGUlATIONS - RThAXATION (i) Meadowside, West Avenue, Hu.llbridge 4 ii) 6 Rookery Close, Rayleigh 5 iii) Southend. Municipal Airport 113 iv) 17 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh 310 v) Ill High Road, Rayleigh 389 vi) 5 Stuart Close, Great Wakaing 471 vii) EEB, London Road, Rayleigh 471 viii) 8 Warwick Road, Rayleigh 471 ix) Southend.
  • Southend-On-Sea to Wallasea Island Report SWI 3: Little Wakering to Sutton Ford Bridge

    Southend-On-Sea to Wallasea Island Report SWI 3: Little Wakering to Sutton Ford Bridge

    www.gov.uk/englandcoastpath England Coast Path Stretch: Southend-on-Sea to Wallasea Island Report SWI 3: Little Wakering to Sutton Ford Bridge Part 3.1: Introduction Start Point: Little Wakering (grid reference: TQ 9316 8897) End Point: Sutton Ford Bridge, Rochford (grid reference: TQ 8832 8963) Relevant Maps: SWI 3a to SWI 3f 3.1.1 This is one of a series of linked but legally separate reports published by Natural England under section 51 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949, which make proposals to the Secretary of State for improved public access along and to this stretch of coast between Southend-on- Sea and Wallasea Island. 3.1.2 This report covers length SWI 3 of the stretch, which is the coast between Little Wakering and Sutton Ford Bridge. It makes free-standing statutory proposals for this part of the stretch, and seeks approval for them by the Secretary of State in their own right under section 52 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949. 3.1.3 The report explains how we propose to implement the England Coast Path (“the trail”) on this part of the stretch, and details the likely consequences in terms of the wider ‘Coastal Margin’ that will be created if our proposals are approved by the Secretary of State. Our report also sets out: any proposals we think are necessary for restricting or excluding coastal access rights to address particular issues, in line with the powers in the legislation; and any proposed powers for the trail to be capable of being relocated on particular sections (“roll- back”), if this proves necessary in the future because of coastal change.
  • History of Stambridge School

    History of Stambridge School

    Contents Stambridge School 1877-1977 1 Staff – May 1877 18 Staff – May 1977 18 Headteachers 1877-1977 19 Written by J. A. Mazonowicz 1977 Original document typed by Mrs. J. Russell, Stambridge Primary School, 1977 Digitised and reset in 2013 STAMBRIDGE SCHOOL, 1877 – 1977 "Now we must educate our masters” said the Secretary for Education, Mr. Robert Lowe, in the House of Commons, after the passing of the Parliamentary Reform Act of 1867 giving working men the vote. In due course, but by the efforts of a new Secretary, Mr. E.M. Forster, the Education Act of 1870 became law and local authorities were required to build schools in parishes where none were available. At the time, for those Stambridge children who were prepared to undertake the journey, there were in Rochford Dame Schools or the National & British Schools, these latter being organised by the church and chapel authorities. Not many children from the village attended the Rochford ecclesiastical school; indeed, a census taken a few years before 1870 indicated that less than half a dozen pupils came from Stambridge. The churches had to finance their schools from voluntary contributions supported only sometimes by a state grant, but the cost of providing a church school proved too prohibitive for the Stambridge religious authorities. However, in order to keep in line with the government decree the prospect of building a school eventually had to be faced and a local Board of Education was set up. This consisted of seven representatives headed by the rector, the Reverend Penny, who used money raised by local rates together with a government grant - equal to the amount already raised - to build and maintain a school for Stambridge children.