DOCSLIB.ORG

Jims' Landing Access Improvements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jims' Landing Access Improvements May 2021 Prepared for: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 1011 E. Tudor Road Anchorage, AK 99503 JIMS’ LANDING ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS Kenai National Wildlife Refuge DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Prepared by 1506 West 36th Avenue Anchorage, AK 99503 Jims’ Landing Access Improvements Draft Environmental Assessment Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action: .................................................................... 4 1.3.1 Support for Purpose and Need .................................................................................. 4 1.4 Project Area ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Scoping and Public Involvement ...................................................................................... 6 2 Alternatives Considered .......................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Alternative A No Action .................................................................................................. 7 2.2 Alternative B .................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Alternative C Preferred Alternative ................................................................................. 9 2.4 Off-site Parking Options ................................................................................................ 15 2.4.1 Option 1 Skilak Lake Road South .......................................................................... 15 2.4.2 Option 2 Skilak Lake Road North .......................................................................... 15 2.5 Construction Sequence and Equipment .......................................................................... 17 2.6 Alternative(s) Considered, But Dismissed From Further Consideration ....................... 17 3 Affected Environment ........................................................................................................... 17 3.1 Air and Noise Quality .................................................................................................... 18 3.2 Geology and Soils .......................................................................................................... 18 3.3 Water Quality ................................................................................................................. 19 3.4 Hydrology and Floodplains ............................................................................................ 19 3.5 Water Resources ............................................................................................................. 20 3.6 Wetlands ......................................................................................................................... 21 3.7 Vegetation and Habitat ................................................................................................... 22 3.8 Fish and Essential Fish Habitat ...................................................................................... 23 3.9 Wildlife ........................................................................................................................... 23 3.10 Cultural Resources ...................................................................................................... 24 3.11 Recreational Opportunities ......................................................................................... 26 3.12 Public Access .............................................................................................................. 27 3.13 Visual Resources ........................................................................................................ 27 3.14 Socio-Economic Conditions ....................................................................................... 28 3.14.1 Local and regional economies ................................................................................ 28 3.15 Administration ............................................................................................................ 28 ii Jims’ Landing Access Improvements Draft Environmental Assessment 4 Environmental Consequences of the Action ......................................................................... 29 4.1 Cumulative Impact Analysis: ......................................................................................... 45 4.2 Mitigation Measures and Conditions ............................................................................. 46 4.2.1 Monitoring .............................................................................................................. 50 4.2.2 Waters and Wetland Avoidance and Mitigation Measures ..................................... 50 4.3 Summary of Analysis ..................................................................................................... 51 4.3.1 Alternative A – No Action Alternative ................................................................... 51 4.3.2 Alternative B – Refine Existing Conditions and Provide Off-Site Parking ............ 52 4.3.3 Alternative C – Preferred Alternative ..................................................................... 52 5 List of Sources, Agencies and Persons Consulted ................................................................ 52 6 References ............................................................................................................................. 55 7 Determination: ...................................................................................................................... 57 List of Tables Table 2-1 Summary Comparison of Alternatives A, B and C ...................................................... 14 Table 2-2 Comparison of Off-Site Parking Options ..................................................................... 17 Table 3-1 Summary of Estimated Sport Fishing and Scenic Floats for Year 2018. ..................... 27 Table 4-1 Affected Natural Resources and Anticipated Impacts of the Proposed Action and Any Alternative..................................................................................................................................... 30 Table 4-2 Affected Visitor Use and Experience and Anticipated Impacts of the Proposed Project and Any Alternative ...................................................................................................................... 39 Table 4-3 Affected Cultural Resources and Anticipated Impacts of the Proposed Action and Any Alternatives ................................................................................................................................... 41 Table 4-4 Affected Refuge Management and Operations and Anticipated Impacts of the Proposed Action and Any Alternative .......................................................................................................... 42 Table 4-5 Affected Socioeconomics and Anticipated Impacts of the Proposed Action and Any Alternatives ................................................................................................................................... 43 Table 4-6 Anticipated Cumulative Impacts of the Proposed Action and Any Alternatives ......... 45 Table 4-7 List of Proposed Best Management Practices and Avoidance, Minimization and Mitigation Measures ..................................................................................................................... 46 List of Figures Figure 1-1 Project Location Overview ........................................................................................... 2 Figure 1-2 Overview of the Project Vicinity .................................................................................. 6 Figure 2-1 Overview of the existing Jims’ Landing facility. ....................................................... 10 Figure 2-2 Alternative B with both off-site parking options. ....................................................... 11 Figure 2-3 Alternative C and both off-site parking options. ........................................................ 13 Figure 2-4 View of Off-site Parking Option 1. ............................................................................. 16 Figure 2-5 View of Off-site Parking Option 2 with elevated pedestrian walkway and bridge. ... 16 Figure 3-1 Flooding of Jims’ Landing during 2012 (Source: USFWS, Steve Miller). ................ 20 iii Jims’ Landing Access Improvements Draft Environmental Assessment Figure 3-2 GoogleEarth image showing bald eagle nest from September 2016 (facing north). .. 25 Figure 3-3 Photo of nest tree without the bald eagle nest taken in November 2020 (facing east). ....................................................................................................................................................... 25 List of Appendices Appendix 1 Other Applicable Statutes, Executive Orders & Regulations Appendix 2 Vegetation and Wetland Resource Study Appendix 3 Wildlife Resource Study Appendix 4 Visual Resources (Scenery) Report Appendix 5 Agency Notification Letters Appendix 6 Tribal Coordination and Notification
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Evaluation of the Trail Lakes Salmon Hatchery for Consistency with Statewide Policies and Prescribed Management Practices
    Regional Information Report No. 5J12-21 An Evaluation of the Trail Lakes Salmon Hatchery for Consistency with Statewide Policies and Prescribed Management Practices by Mark Stopha October 2012 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Commercial Fisheries Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the following reports by the Divisions of Sport Fish and of Commercial Fisheries: Fishery Manuscripts, Fishery Data Series Reports, Fishery Management Reports, Special Publications and the Division of Commercial Fisheries Regional Reports. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Mathematics, statistics centimeter cm Alaska Administrative all standard mathematical deciliter dL Code AAC signs, symbols and gram g all commonly accepted abbreviations hectare ha abbreviations e.g., Mr., Mrs., alternate hypothesis HA kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. base of natural logarithm e kilometer km all commonly accepted catch per unit effort CPUE liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., coefficient of variation CV meter m R.N., etc. common test statistics (F, t, 2, etc.) milliliter mL at @ confidence interval CI millimeter mm compass directions: correlation coefficient east E (multiple) R Weights and measures (English) north N correlation coefficient cubic feet per second ft3/s south S (simple) r foot ft west W covariance cov gallon gal copyright degree (angular ) ° inch in corporate suffixes: degrees of freedom df mile mi Company Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Chugach National Forest Wilderness Area Inventory and Evaluation
    Chugach National Forest Wilderness Area Inventory and Evaluation Overview of the Wilderness Area Recommendation Process As part of plan revision, the responsible official, the forest supervisor, shall “identify and evaluate lands that may be suitable for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and determine whether to recommend any such lands for wilderness designation” (36 CFR 219.7(c)(2)(v), effective May 9, 2012). Forest Service directives (FSH 1909.12, Chapter 70) for implementing the 2012 Planning Rule provide further guidance on how to complete this process in four steps: (1) Identify and inventory all lands that may be suitable for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System (2) Evaluate the wilderness characteristics of each area based on a given set of criteria (3) The forest supervisor will determine which areas to further analyze in the NEPA process (4) The forest supervisor will decide which areas, if any, to recommend for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System This report provides documentation for the inventory and evaluation steps of this process, and is divided into two sections. The first section provides information about the inventory process and results. These results also include a description of the current conditions and management for vegetation, wildlife, fish, recreation, and access to the Chugach National Forest as they are related to wilderness character. This description is intended to provide a big-picture view of national forest resources and serve as a foundation for the evaluation section. The second section provides an area by area evaluation of wilderness characteristics found in the inventoried lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai Peninsula Area – Units 7 & 15
    Kenai Peninsula Area – Units 7 & 15 PROPOSAL 156 - 5 AAC 85.045. Hunting seasons and bag limits for moose. Shorten the moose seasons in Unit 15 as follows: Go back to a September season, with the archery season starting on September 1, running for one week with a two week rifle season following. What is the issue you would like the board to address and why? Moose hunting starts too early. The weather is too warm. Antler restrictions due to lack of bulls. Shorten the season. Three weeks rather than six is plenty of moose hunting opportunity considering the lack of mature bulls. There will be better meat and less spoilage. Antlers are still growing in archery season. Hunters will need to butcher moose the day they are harvested. PROPOSED BY: Joseph Ross (EG-C14-193) ****************************************************************************** PROPOSAL 157 - 5 AAC 85.045. Hunting seasons and bag limits for moose. Change the general bull moose season dates in Unit 15 to September 1-30 as follows: Move the season forward ten days, changing the Unit 15 general bull moose harvest dates to September 1-30, so a much higher percentage of harvested meat will make it back to hunters' homes to be good table fare. What is the issue you would like the board to address and why? At issue is the preservation of moose meat in Unit 15. It is so warm and humid during the season that moose harvests can turn into monumental struggles to properly care for fresh meat. The culprits are heat, moisture, and flies, each singularly able to ruin a harvest in a matter of a day or two.
    [Show full text]
  • Marking Juvenile Coho Salmon in the Kenai River with Coded, Microwire Tags
    Fishery Data Series No. 93-52 Marking Juvenile Coho Salmon in the Kenai River With Coded, Microwire Tags bY Jay A. Carlon and James J. Hasbrouck December 1993 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Sport Fish FISHERY DATA SERIES NO. 93-52 MARKING JUVENILE COHO SALMON IN THE KENAI RIVER WITH CODED, MICROWIRE TAGS1 BY Jay A. Carlon and James J. Hasbrouck Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Sport Fish Anchorage, Alaska December 1993 1 This information was partially financed by the Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 777-777K) under Project F-10-8, Job No. S-2-14a. The Fishery Data Series was established in 1987 for the publication of technically oriented results for a single project or group of closely related projects. Fishery Data Series reports are intended for fishery and other technical professionals. Distribution is to state and local publication distribution centers, libraries and individuals and, on request, to other libraries, agencies, and individuals. This publication has undergone editorial and peer review. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game receives federal funding. All of its public programs and activities are operated free from discrimination on the basis of race, religion, sex, color, national origin, age, or handicap. Any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against by this agency should write to: OEO U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pane LIST OF TABLES..... iii LIST OF FIGURES .............................................. iv LIST OF APPENDICES ........................................... V ABSTRACT..................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION................................................. 2 Background .............................................. 2 Marking History ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Erosion and Sedimentation in the Kenai River, Alaska
    ay) ifim Erosion and Sedimentation in the Kenai River, Alaska By KEVIN M. SCOTT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1235 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1982 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Scott/ Kevin M./ 1935- Erosion and sedimentation in the Kenai River/ Alaska. (Geological Survey professional paper ; 1235) Bibliography: p. 33-35 Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1235 1. Sediments (Geology) Alaska Kenai River watershed. 2. Erosion Alaska Kenai River watershed. I. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. II. Title. III. Series: United States. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1235. QE571.S412 553.7'8'097983 81-6755 AACR2 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract _-_----___---_-______________________________ 1 Bed material Continued Introduction __________________________________________ 1 Gravel dunes in channel below SkilakLake ___-----_-___- 17 The Kenai River watershed -_-------_---__--_____________ 3 Armoring of the channel _---____------------_-_-----_ 18 Climate ____________________________________ 3 Possible effects of armoring on salmon habitat ___________ 19 Vegetation ________________________________________ 3 Surficial deposits of the modern flood plain _____________ 19 Hydrology ____________________________________________ 4 Suspended sediment
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Professional Paper 543-F, Text
    The Alaska Earthquake March 27, 1964 Regional Effects Ground Breakage in the Cook Inlet Area GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 543-F THE ALASKA EARTHQUAKE, MARCH 27, 1964: REGIONAL EFFECTS Ground Breakage and Associated Effects in the Cook Inlet Area, Alaska, Resulting from the March 27, 1964, Earthquake By HELEN L. FOSTER and THOR N. V. KARLSTROM A description of the ground cracks ,and deposits from ground-water eruptions and crustal changes, particularly in the Kenai Lowland GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 543-F UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1967 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 THE ALASKA EARTHQUAKE SERIES The U.S. Geological Survey is publishing there­ sults of investigations of the earthquake in a series of six Professional Papers. Professional Paper 543 describes the regional effects of the earthquake. Other Professional Papers describe the history of the field investigations and reconstruction effort; the effects of the earthquake on communities; the effects on hydrology; and the effects on transportation, communications, and utilities. CONTENTS Page Page Page Abstract_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ F 1 Ground breakage-Con. Causes of ground breakage_ _ _ _ _ F24 Introduction__________________ 1 Kenai Lowland______________ F3 Crustal changes in the Cook In- Scope of report and source of Northeast-trending zone____
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing in the Seward Area
    Southcentral Region Department of Fish and Game Fishing in the Seward Area About Seward The Seward and North Gulf Coast area is located in the southeastern portion of Alaska’s Kenai Peninsula. Here you’ll find spectacular scenery and many opportunities to fish, camp, and view Alaska’s wildlife. Many Seward area recreation opportunities are easily reached from the Seward Highway, a National Scenic Byway extending 127 miles from Seward to Anchorage. Seward (pop. 2,000) may also be reached via railroad, air, or bus from Anchorage, or by the Alaska Marine ferry trans- portation system. Seward sits at the head of Resurrection Bay, surrounded by the U.S. Kenai Fjords National Park and the U.S. Chugach National Forest. Most anglers fish salt waters for silver (coho), king (chinook), and pink (humpy) salmon, as well as halibut, lingcod, and various species of rockfish. A At times the Division issues in-season regulatory changes, few red (sockeye) and chum (dog) salmon are also harvested. called Emergency Orders, primarily in response to under- or over- King and red salmon in Resurrection Bay are primarily hatch- abundance of fish. Emergency Orders are sent to radio stations, ery stocks, while silvers are both wild and hatchery stocks. newspapers, and television stations, and posted on our web site at www.adfg.alaska.gov . A few area freshwater lakes have stocked or wild rainbow trout populations and wild Dolly Varden, lake trout, and We also maintain a hot line recording at (907) 267- 2502. Or Arctic grayling. you can contact the Anchorage Sport Fish Information Center at (907) 267-2218.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Resource Harvests and Uses by Residents of Seward and Moose Pass, Alaska, 2000
    Wild Resource Harvests and Uses by Residents of Seward and Moose Pass, Alaska, 2000 By Brian Davis, James A. Fall, and Gretchen Jennings Technical Paper Number 271 Prepared for: Chugach National Forest US Forest Service 3301 C Street, Suite 300 Anchorage, AK 9950s Purchase Order No. 43-0109-1-0069 Division of Subsistence Alaska Department of Fish and Game Juneau, Alaska June 2003 ADA PUBLICATIONS STATEMENT The Alaska Department of Fish and Game operates all of its public programs and activities free from discrimination on the basis of sex, color, race, religion, national origin, age, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability. For information on alternative formats available for this and other department publications, please contact the department ADA Coordinator at (voice) 907-465-4120, (TDD) 1-800-478-3548 or (fax) 907-586-6595. Any person who believes she or he has been discriminated against should write to: Alaska Department of Fish and Game PO Box 25526 Juneau, AK 99802-5526 or O.E.O. U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 ABSTRACT In March and April of 2001 researchers employed by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game’s (ADF&G) Division of Subsistence conducted 203 interviews with residents of Moose Pass and Seward, two communities in the Kenai Peninsula Borough. The study was designed to collect information about the harvest and use of wild fish, game, and plant resources, demography, and aspects of the local cash economy such as employment and income. These communities were classified “non-rural” by the Federal Subsistence Board in 1990, which periodically reviews its classifications.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2019 to 09/30/2019 Chugach National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2019 to 09/30/2019 Chugach National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact R10 - Alaska Region, Regionwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Region) Alaska Roadless Rulemaking - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:06/2020 07/2020 Robin Dale EIS Orders NOI in Federal Register 907-586-9344 [email protected] *UPDATED* 08/02/2018 Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 07/2019 Description: Alaska specific roadless rule that will establish a land classification system designed to conserve roadless area characteristics on the Tongass National Forest. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=54511 Location: UNIT - R10 - Alaska Region All Units. STATE - Alaska. COUNTY - Juneau, Ketchikan Gateway, Prince of Wales-Outer, Sitka, Wrangell-Petersburg, Yakutat. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Tongass National Forest. Chugach National Forest, Forestwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Forest) R10 - Alaska Region Chugach Forest Plan Revision - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:02/2020 03/2020 Susan Jennings EIS DEIS NOA in Federal Register 907-772-5864 [email protected] *UPDATED* 08/03/2018 Est. FEIS NOA in Federal Register 09/2019 Description: The Chugach National Forest is revising and updating its 2002 Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan). Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=40816 Location: UNIT - Chugach National Forest All Units. STATE - Alaska. COUNTY - Anchorage, Kenai Peninsula, Valdez- Cordova. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Chugach National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • TO LIMNOLOGICAL DATA for SOUTHCENTRAL ALASKA LAKES by Mary A
    INDEX TO LIMNOLOGICAL DATA FOR SOUTHCENTRAL ALASKA LAKES by Mary A. Maurer and Paul F. Woods U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 87-529 Prepared in cooperation with the ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL AND GEOPFYSICAL SURVEYS Anchorage, Alaska 1987 DEPARTMENT OF THE 1NTFRIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section Water Resources Division Federal Center 4230 University Drive, Suite 201 Box 25425 Anchorage, Alaska 99508-4664 Denver, Colorado 80225 11 CONTENTS Page Introduction ..................................................... 1 Methods .......................................................... 1 Findings ......................................................... 2 Acknowledgements ................................................. 3 Municipality of Anchorage ........................................ 5 Matanuska-Susitna Borough ........................................ 13 Kenai Peninsula Borough .......................................... 45 Kodiak Island Borough ............................................ 81 Copper River Valley/Prince William Sound ......................... 101 References cited ................................................. 131 111 0 100 200 MILES I I 0 100 200 300 KILOMETERS Matanuska-Susitna Borough Unincorporated Copper River Valley - Prince William Sound Area Kenai Peninsula
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai Winter Access
    Kenai Winter Access United States Record of Decision Department of Agriculture Forest Service Chugach National Forest R10-MB-596 July 2007 "The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.” Kenai Winter Access Record of Decision USDA Forest Service, Region 10 Chugach National Forest Seward Ranger District This Record of Decision (ROD) documents my decision concerning winter access on the Seward Ranger District. I have selected the Modified Preferred Alternative described in the Kenai Winter Access Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS). Through this decision I am also approving a non-significant amendment to the Chugach National Forest Revised Land and Resource Management Plan of 2002 (Forest Plan). This decision is based upon: the FEIS, the Forest Plan, the Forest Plan Record of Decision (ROD), and the FEIS for the Forest Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2014 to 06/30/2014 Chugach National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2014 to 06/30/2014 Chugach National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Chugach National Forest, Forestwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Forest) R10 - Alaska Region Chugach Forest Plan Revision - Land management planning Developing Proposal Expected:12/2016 06/2017 Donald Rees EIS Est. NOI in Federal Register 907-743-9513 04/2014 [email protected] Description: Revision of the Chugach National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan). Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=40816 Location: UNIT - Chugach National Forest All Units. STATE - Alaska. COUNTY - Anchorage, Kenai Peninsula, Valdez- Cordova. Chugach National Forest. Cooper Creek Stream - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants In Progress: Expected:09/2014 05/2015 John Lang Restoration - Watershed management Comment Period Public Notice 907-288-7719 EA 06/16/2012 [email protected] Description: Stream restoration work on the lower 0.75 miles of Cooper Creek, from the mouth of the canyon to the confluence with the Kenai River. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/projects/chugach/landmanagement/projects Location: UNIT - Chugach National Forest All Units. STATE - Alaska. COUNTY - Kenai Peninsula. LEGAL - Township 05N, Range 03W, and section 34. Mile post 51.5 Sterling Highway. Chugach National Forest, Occurring in more than one District (excluding Forestwide) R10 - Alaska Region Kenai Peninsula Invasive Plant - Vegetation management In Progress: Expected:05/2014 06/2014 Betty Charnon Control (other than forest products) Comment Period Public Notice 907-754-2326 EA 12/05/2013 [email protected] Est.
    [Show full text]