DOCSLIB.ORG

GEF PROJECT DOCUMENT Cover Page

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GEF PROJECT DOCUMENT Cover Page WORLD WILDLIFE FUND- GEF PROJECT DOCUMENT Cover Page Project Title: Securing the Future of Peru’s Natural Protected Areas Parent Program: Amazon Sustainable Landscapes Program GEF Project ID: 9374 (Child Project ID); 9272 (Program ID) WWF-US Project ID: G0010 Countries: Peru Project Duration: 72 months Project Type: Child Project GEF Trust Fund(s): GEF Trust Fund GEF Focal Area(s): Multi-focal Areas GEF Focal Area Objective(s): BD-1 Program 1; LD-2 Program 3; SFM-2; SFM-4 Program 9 Project Executing Partners: SERNANP, PROFONANPE GEF Project Cost: US $9,007,528 GEF Agency Fee: US $810,677 Project Co-financing: US $54,460,781 Total Project Cost: US $64,278,986 WWF GEF Agency Contact: Renae Stenhouse Version Date: June 22, 2017 1 | Page Contents List of Tables ..................................................................................................................................................4 List of Figures .................................................................................................................................................6 Acronyms and abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................7 SECTION 1: PROJECT BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................. 10 1.1 BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT ................................................................................................................. 12 1.1.1 Introduction to the Amazon Sustainable Landscapes Program ............................................................... 12 1.1.2 Regional and global significance of the Peruvian Amazon ....................................................................... 13 1.2 PROTECTED AREAS IN PERU .......................................................................................................................... 14 1.2.1 Legal, planning and policy framework ...................................................................................................... 15 1.2.2 Institutional setup .................................................................................................................................... 15 1.2.3 Natural protected areas managed by the National Government (SINANPE) ........................................... 17 1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEM, LONG TERM SOLUTION AND BARRIERS ................................................... 19 1.3.1 Environmental problem ............................................................................................................................ 19 1.3.2 Long term solution and barriers ............................................................................................................... 21 1.4 BASELINE ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................. 27 1.4.1 Baseline for a Government endorsed initiative for long-term financial sustainability of the NPA system27 1.4.2 Baseline for self-generated resources ...................................................................................................... 31 1.4.3 Baseline for NPA management effectiveness and financial management .............................................. 32 1.5 OPPORTUNITIES AND LINKAGES .............................................................................................................. 34 SECTION 2: GEF INTERVENTION STRATEGY .................................................................................................... 35 2.1 PROJECT RATIONALE, SCOPE AND OBJECTIVE ........................................................................................ 35 2.2 PROJECT STRATEGIES AND EXPECTED RESULTS (GEF Project Components) .......................................... 38 2.3 GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS ...................................................................................................... 59 2.4 INCREMENTAL REASONING ..................................................................................................................... 59 2.5 RISK ANALYSIS AND RISK MANAGEMENT MEASURES ............................................................................. 66 2.6 CONSISTENCY WITH NATIONAL PLANS OR PRIORITIES ........................................................................... 68 2.7 CONSISTENCY WITH GEF FOCAL AREA/FUND STRATEGIES ..................................................................... 70 2.8 WWF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE AND CONSISTENCY WITH WWF PROGRAMS .................................. 74 2.9 INNOVATIVENESS, SUSTAINABILITY & POTENTIAL FOR SCALING-UP ..................................................... 76 2 | Page 2.10 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGIES ......................................................... 80 SECTION 3: INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS .................................... 81 3.1 GENERAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE ........................................................................................... 81 3.2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION ................................................................................................ 82 SECTION 4: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ..................................................................................................... 86 4.1. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN PROJECT PREPARATION .......................................................................... 86 4.1.1. Project Partners ....................................................................................................................................... 86 4.1.2. Partners of the Amazon Sustainable Landscapes Program ..................................................................... 86 4.1.3. National level stakeholders ..................................................................................................................... 87 4.1.4. Local stakeholders ................................................................................................................................... 89 4.2 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION .................................................................... 92 SECTION 5: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS .............................................................................. 95 SECTION 6: GENDER EQUALITY ..................................................................................................................... 96 SECTION 7: MONITORING AND EVALUATION ............................................................................................ 99 7.1 OVERVIEW OF MONITORING AND EVALUATION ......................................................................................... 99 7.2 MONITORING & EVALUATION COMPONENTS & ACTIVITIES ...................................................................... 100 7.3 PROJECT STAFF DEDICATED TO M&E .......................................................................................................... 103 SECTION 8: PROJECT BUDGET AND FINANCING ....................................................................................... 103 8.1 PROJECT BUDGET OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................... 103 8.2 PROJECT BUDGET NOTES ............................................................................................................................ 110 8.3 PROJECT MANAGEMENT COSTS (PMC) ....................................................................................................... 120 8.4 MONITORING AND EVALUATION BUDGET .................................................................................................. 121 8.5 SAFEGUARDS BUDGET ................................................................................................................................. 122 8.6 GENDER MAINSTREAMING BUDGET ........................................................................................................... 122 APPENDICES .............................................................................................................................................. 123 APPENDIX 1 PROJECT MAPS ............................................................................................................................ 123 APPENDIX 2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON PERU’S NATIONAL PA SYSTEM ................................................ 125 APPENDIX 3 FINANCING FOR THE NATIONAL SYSTEM OF NATURAL PROTECTED AREAS MANAGED BY THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT (SINANPE) ............................................................................................................. 132 APPENDIX 4 CONCEPTUAL MODEL .................................................................................................................. 135 APPENDIX 5a. SINANPE’s STANDARD LEVELS OF NPA MANAGEMENT .......................................................... 136 3 | Page APPENDIX 5b. BARRIERS RELATED TO THE DIFFERENT BENCHMARKS OF THE STANDARD LEVELS OF MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................................................................ 137 APPENDIX 6 BASELINE FOR BASIC AND STRUCTURAL STANDARD MANAGEMENT LEVELS FOR AMAZON NPAs140 APPENDIX 7 LIST OF POSSIBLE FINANCIAL MECHANISMS .............................................................................. 145 APPENDIX 8 PFP APPROACH ...........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No. 46446-PE PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A PROPOSED GRANT Public Disclosure Authorized FROM THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY TRUST FUND IN THE AMOUNT OF US$8.891 MILLION TO THE PERUVIAN TRUST FUND FOR NATIONAL PARKS AND PROTECTED AREAS (PROFONANPE) FOR A Public Disclosure Authorized STRENGTHENING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION THROUGH THE NATIONAL PROTECTED AREAS PROGRAM April 7, 2010 Sustainable Development Department Bolivia, Chile, Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela Country Management Unit Latin America and the Caribbean Region Public Disclosure Authorized This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. REPUBLIC OF PERU FISCAL YEAR January 1–December 31 CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective: March 24, 2010) Currency Unit = Nuevos Soles 2.83 Nuevos Soles = US$ 1 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES Metric System ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS APECO Peruvian Association for the Conservation of Nature CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CIMA Center for Conservation, Research and Management of Protected Areas CONAM National Environmental Council COP Conference of the Parties of the CBD DPL Development Policy Loan ENV DPL Series of Programmatic Environmantal Developmnet Loans GEF Global Environment Facility GoP Government of Peru GPAN Participatory Management of Protected Areas Project IANP Bureau of Natural Protected Areas IBRD International
    [Show full text]
  • CBD First National Report
    BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IN PERU __________________________________________________________ LIMA-PERU NATIONAL REPORT December 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................ 6 1 PROPOSED PROGRESS REPORT MATRIX............................................... 20 I INTRODUCTION......................................................................................... 29 II BACKGROUND.......................................................................................... 31 a Status and trends of knowledge, conservation and use of biodiversity. ..................................................................................................... 31 b. Direct (proximal) and indirect (ultimate) threats to biodiversity and its management ......................................................................................... 36 c. The value of diversity in terms of conservation and sustainable use.................................................................................................................... 47 d. Legal & political framework for the conservation and use of biodiversity ...................................................................................................... 51 e. Institutional responsibilities and capacities................................................. 58 III NATIONAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ON THE CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE USE OF BIODIVERSITY.............................................................................................. 77
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Ecosystems and Biodiversity at a Continental Scale—A Proposal for South America
    Monitoring Ecosystems and Biodiversity at a Continental Scale—A Proposal for South America Dr. Xavier Silva, Director, IDB-TNC Ecoregional Project, South America. Teacher and Lecturer, San Francisco de Quito University. Board Member, OÏKOS Foundation Abstract—A monitoring system plan is being developed in South America to assess critically endangered ecoregions. The system will be based on a previous ecosystem and biodiversity inventory developed through a large gap analysis program in five South American ecoregions. The monitoring system will include three main elements: (1) Landscape Ecology: vegetation cover, fragmentation and deforestation, infrastruc- ture (road, dams, pipelines); (2) Biological guidelines: species richness, endemism, endangered species and species of a particular interest; and (3) Conservation Policy and Socio-Economic guidelines: national protected areas systems, conservation policies, human population on important areas, main economic activities and other. Such a sys- tem is an important need for governments and private organizations in South America, especially to detect critical sites and socio-political issues before the environmental problems become too large. Introduction and Background Among the results, 6,473 species of flora and fauna have been analyzed (each one with a map indicating it’s Environmental surveillance at a continental scale is potential geographic distribution), and over 6,500 the- an important conservation requirement in vast territo- matic maps have been produced, indicating vegetation ries, such as in South America, where large and diverse types, centers of high diversity and endemism, current ecoregions are being altered by a number of unsustainable and potential threats, forest fragmentation, infrastructure, location of protected areas, and basic socio-economical development practices (Busch and Trexler 2003, World information.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Systems of the Amazon Basin of Peru and Bolivia Clasification and Mapping
    ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS of the Amazon Basin of Peru and Bolivia Clasification and Mapping Ecological Systems of the Amazon Basin of Peru and Bolivia Clasification and Mapping Ecological Systems of the Amazon Basin Peru and Bolivia • Clasification Mapping Published by This publication has been financed by The Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation www.moore.org Ecological Systems of the Amazon Basin of Peru and Bolivia Classification and Mapping Josse, C., G. Navarro, F. Encarnación, A. Tovar, P. Comer, W. Ferreira, F. Rodríguez, J. Saito, J. Sanjurjo, J. Dyson, E. Rubin de Celis, R. Zárate, J. Chang, M. Ahuite, C. Vargas, F. Paredes, W. Castro, J. Maco y F. Reátegui #$# 5.!,- NatureServe is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing the scientific basis for effective conservation action. The Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonía Peruana is an autonomous governmental entity, based in the Amazon Basin of Peru. Its mission is to support the betterment of the local communities’ quality of life by dedicating research to sustainable development and conservation of the natural resources in the Amazon region. The Conservation Data Center in the Facultad de Ciencias Forestales of the Universidad Nacional Agraria la Molina is an information management unity of the #$# 5.!,- biological and ecological information of Peru. The unity keeps records of fauna and flora species as well as diminishing terrestrial and marine environments. Photo Credits Gonzalo Navarro, IIAP, CDC-UNALM, NatureServe, Hugo Arnal, Walter H. Wust Cover Photo Frans Lanting (cover, Tambopata river); Walter H. Wust (back cover, Amiguillo river) Editorial Coordination Cristiane Nascimento Editorial Production Wust Ediciones / www.walterwust.com Translation Ana Maria Piza Printer Gráfica Biblos © NatureServe 2007 ISBN: 0-9711053-7-5 Total or partial use of text permitted with proper citation Citation: Josse, C., G.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Opportunities for Divergence in Heterogeneous Environments in the Tropical Andes
    Exploring the opportunities for divergence in heterogeneous environments in the tropical Andes by Diego F. Alvarado Serrano A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) in The University of Michigan 2013 Doctoral Committee: Professor L. Lacey Knowles, Chair Associate Professor Christopher William Dick Assistant Professor Ines Ibáñez Professor Philip Myers Copyright Diego F. Alvarado Serrano 2013 DEDICATION To both my families, the one I was luckily born in and the one I chose to form; especially to my parents and my wife, without whom I would not have been able to come this far. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people and institutions collaborated to make this work possible, for that I am completely grateful. Particular mention deserves my committee members. First and foremost, I want to thank my advisor, Lacey Knowles, for her critical contribution towards my development as an independent scientist, her invaluable assistance with my research, and her continuous professional and personal support and encouragement. I also want to thank my committee members, Chris Dick, Ines Ibáñez, and Phil Myers, for their guidance and feedback during my time at U of M. I also like to thank my current and past lab mates for their various contributions. Special thanks to Tim Connallon, Qixin He, Hayley Lanier, and Lucy Tran, with whom I shared most of my research developments. Thank you also to Susana Pereira for her time and patience in introducing me to molecular lab work. Thanks also to Kevin Gabelman and Levi Morris, two undergrads that collaborated with me in several aspects of my research.
    [Show full text]
  • The Peru Amazon Rainforest Project Project Vision
    Welcome to the Peru Amazon Rainforest Project The Peru Amazon Rainforest Project works with carefully selected partners to actively help protect the Amazon rainforest. The Amazon rainforest, which is the biggest and most diverse rainforest in the world, covers more than half of Peru and is home to thousands of unique and endangered animals, plants and ecosystems. You will be based with our local project partner Crees (www.crees-manu.org) – a Peruvian based non-profit founded in 2002 to support a sustainable Amazon through better understanding of the value of the rainforest, and by helping local people to access its resources in ways that are both profitable and that will preserve the forest for the future. Crees stands for conservation, research and environmental education towards sustainability and sets to prove that ethical and sustainable practices can produce and create an improved future. Crees is now the leading conservation and sustainable development non-profit organisation working in the Manu Biosphere Reserve. The work that is being done by the project – with the support of volunteers – is vital for the welfare of the Amazon not just in Manu, but all throughout Peru and South America. Project vision Crees’ vision is to create a sustainable Amazon where humankind and nature can support one another through balance, respect and innovation. They aim to achieve this through: • striving not only for conservation of the rainforest, but also for economic, social and environmental harmony. • developing strategic, proactive and ecologically sound programmes, by managing and developing sustainable eco-friendly facilities and by being leaders in logistics and operations of educational programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • Epiphytic Bryophytes and Habitat Microclimate Variation in Lower Montane Rainforest, Peru
    Epiphytic bryophytes and habitat microclimate variation in lower montane rainforest, Peru. by Jerry Romanski BSc. (University of Tasmania) A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an Honours Degree at the School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania (November, 2007). i Declaration This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any tertiary institution, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference is made in the text of the thesis. Signed Jerry Romanski BSc. Signed Jerry Romanski 18 November 2007 18 November 2007 ii Abstract A survey of epiphytic bryophytes and a study of microclimatic variation within a tree crown were conducted in lower montane rainforest at 2400 m in the Peruvian Yungas. A total of 129 species (87 hepatics, 1 hornwort and 41 mosses) were collected on 3 trees, using different methodologies. A single Weinmannia sp. host supported 110 species (77 hepatics, 1 hornwort and 32 mosses). Species with a wide distribution on the hosts made up 47% of the epiphytic assemblage, 22% were limited to the trunks and 31% occurred only in the crowns. The overall hepatic to moss ratio was 2.15:1. Mosses exhibited a narrower distributional range than hepatics. The greatest species richness and abundance was found on the large branches in the mid-crown. Species found in the mid-crown generally had a broader distribution on hosts than those found on the lower trunk or the outer crown.
    [Show full text]
  • La Perla Acquisition, Abra Patricia Reserve in Peru
    La Perla Acquisition, Abra Patricia Reserve in Peru A Tropical Forest Forever Fund Grant Continuing with our efforts to protect wintering grounds for nearctic/neotropical migrants, our Tropical Forest Forever Fund,awarded a grant of $25,000 to American Bird Conservancy and ECOAN to acquire a significant forest addition to the Abra Patricia Reserve in Peru: the La Perla tract (shown in red on the map below). The Abra Patricia-Alto Nieva Private Conservation Area is located at mid- altitude in the foothills of the Andes, in the Peruvian Yungas where bird diversity is among the highest on Earth. The reserve protects parts of the upper watershed and headwaters of the Amazon River which is threatened by accessibility through a major paved road as well as the construction of new roads, bringing logging, agriculture, and cattle ranching as well as poaching of wildlife and orchids. A total of 6,690 acres has been acquired for this reserve to protect habitat for migratory and threatened bird species including the endangered Long-Whiskered Owlet and the Ochre-fronted Antpitta. The reserve is owned and managed by ECOAN, the Andean Ecosystem Association which works to conserve birds and other wildlife and their ecosystems in the Andes of Peru. The American Bird Conservancy and ECOAN are in the final stages of acquiring the core tracts of forest needed to complete the Abra Patricia Reserve and the 86- acre La Perla tract is a significant addition. It is located on the southern edge of the reserve and has about 60% forest cover. The World Bank and World Wildlife Fund rank the Peruvian Yungas ecoregion among the richest ecosystems in the world with at least 7,000 species of flowering plants and an exceptional concentration of endemic plant and animal species.
    [Show full text]
  • Alto Huayabamba Conservation Peru
    Alto Huayabamba Conservation Mariscal Cáceres Peru Province Protecting two globally recognised ecosystems of exceptional biodiversity Photo by: Elvis Charpentier | IIAP Covering over 53,000 ha and two distinct ecosystems - the Paramos of the central cordillera and the Peruvian Yungas, a mountain forest - the project area, once heavily threatened by deforestation, now acts as a strategic connection between multiple national parks and conservation corridors for endangered animals such as the jaguar. The project has been closely designed with 40 local families to ensure a participatory approach that marries environmental protection with improving livelihoods southpole.com/projects Project 302 150 | 1696EN, 05.2020 The Context The project lies within a corridor of two ecoregions of significant global importance: the The project protects the tropical Andes on the eastern foothills and the Great Wild Area of the Amazon in the habitats of numerous lowland areas of the Amazonian Andes. The main drivers of deforestation in this area include clearing forested land for pasture, industrial crops, illicit coca plantations and threatened species, adding mining. These have been prevalent due to the lack of alternative economic opportunities to the network of corridors in the region created for jaguars and The Project Located in the department of San Martín, in Mariscal Cáceres Province, in central-north Peru, the project spans 53,000 ha. The protected area forms part of a vast wildlife corridor, the Abiseo- Cóndor-Kutukú Corridor, that extends from Sangay National Park in Ecuador to the Cordillera Azul National Park in Perú. The project aims to reduce emissions associated with deforestation and land degradation by implementing sustainable productive activities, effective land management, environmental education and strengthening governance.
    [Show full text]
  • Distributional Patterns of the Brazilian Free-Tailed Bat Tadarida Brasiliensis in the Peruvian Territory
    THERYA, 2020, Vol. 11(3): 495-507 DOI: 10.12933/therya-20-995 ISSN 2007-3364 Distributional patterns of the Brazilian free-tailed bat Tadarida brasiliensis in the Peruvian territory ORLANDO ZEGARRA1*, JAIME PACHECO1,2, AND VÍCTOR PACHECO1 1 Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Av. Arenales 1256, Lima 15072, Perú. Email: orzegarra@ gmail.com (OZ), [email protected] (VP). 2 Centro de Investigación Biodiversidad Sostenible (BioS), Francisco de Zela 1556, Lima 14. Lima, Perú. Email: biojpacheco@ gmail.com (JP). *Corresponding author The molossid bat Tadarida brasiliensis has a wide and apparently continuous distribution in South America. Although it has been reported in several localities of both versants of the Peruvian Andes, the potential distribution for this species has not been formally analyzed. Therefore, we describe its distributional pattern in the territory and provide comments about the possible influence of the Andes in its distribution. We gathered occurrence records from museums, acoustic surveys, literature, GBIF and Vertnet sources, and we selected localities to minimize spa- tial correlation. After defining a minimum-convex polygon of Peruvian records as background area, we use Maxent software with bioclimatic variables to construct species distribution models. Several models were evaluated using different metrics, and the model with the lowest AICc was selected. Then, the model was projected for Peruvian territory. Tadarida brasiliensis is reported for the first time in Cajamarca, Piura and Ica departments. The potential distribution model showed two disjunct suitable areas, one for the Pacific versant and other for the Amazo- nian versant of the Andes, but connected with moderate suitable conditions in the Huancabamba Depression region in northern Perú.
    [Show full text]
  • By the False Coralsnake Oxyrhopus Petolarius (Serpentes: Dipsadidae) in the Bolivian Yungas
    Herpetology Notes, volume 14: 279-282 (2021) (published online on 01 February 2021) Predation on a Gray-breasted Wood Wren (Henicorhina leucophrys) by the False Coralsnake Oxyrhopus petolarius (Serpentes: Dipsadidae) in the Bolivian Yungas Oliver Quinteros-Muñoz1,* and Rodrigo Aguayo1,2 The false coralsnake, Oxyrhopus petolarius (Linnaeus, adjacent to secondary humid montane forest (Cyathea 1758) is a Micrurus mimic (Bosque et al., 2016) of sp., Dicthyocaryum lamarckianum, Ficus sp.) near medium size (maximum snout–vent length 862 mm) and Chaquisacha, Carrasco National Park, Cochabamba with a thin body (Duellman, 2005). These snakes are Department, Bolivia (17.4108°S, 65.2373°W; elevation generally nocturnal but sometimes are observed during 1383 m). According to Ibich and Merida (2003), this area the day. They are primarily terrestrial, although the species is part of the Bolivian-Peruvian Yungas ecoregion. The is also considered semi-arboreal, as are other species in distended midsection of the snake indicated that it had the genus (Alencar et al., 2013; Natera-Mumaw et al., recently swallowed a prey item, and after a few minutes 2015; Mikalauskas et al., 2017). Like their congeners, of handling the snake to take measurements and identify O. petolarius has an opisthoglyphous dentition (rearward it, it regurgitated an undigested bird (Fig. 1B). grooves), allowing it to inoculate prey with toxic secretions The prey was an adult Gray-breasted Wood Wren, (Lynch, 2009; MacCulloch et al., 2009). In Bolivia, the Henicorhina leucophrys (Tschudi, 1844) (Passeriformes: species has been recorded in lowland Amazonian Forest, Troglodytidae), a terrestrial bird inhabiting the understory Humid Mountain Cloud Forest (Yungas), and Tucumano- of Andean subtropical montane forests in Venezuela, Bolivian Forests of the Beni, Chuquisaca, Cochabamba, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia (Olmedo, 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Peru Amarakaeri Communal Reserve
    Park Profile - Peru Amarakaeri Communal Reserve Date of last field evaluation: April 2003 Date published: May 2003 Location: District of Madre de Dios, province of Manu, department of Madre de Dios and district of Pilcopata, province of Paucartambo, department of Cuzco. Year created: 2002 Area: 402,335.62 ha Eco-region: Southwestern Amazonian moist forests, Peruvian yungas. Habitats: Subtropical humid forests, subtropical rainforest, semi-flooded subtropical rainforest Summary Description Amarakaeri Communal Reserve is located in the department of Madre de Dios between Manu National Park, Tambopata National Reserve and Bahuaja-Sonene National Park. It forms part of an international conservation corridor that includes protected areas in Bolivia and Brazil. It features a typical tropical humid climate, with plains and winding rivers in the lowlands and mountain ranges and deep gorges in the highlands. Biodiversity Amarakaeri Communal Reserve has a wide range of life zones and high biological diversity. The forest features varied plant life due to the altitudinal ranges, and a large number of species are found throughout different forest regions. The area is home to species such as the giant river otter, jaguar, black spider monkey, spectacled bear, macaw and helmeted curassow. 1 Amarakaeri Communal Reserve—Peru www.parkswatch.org Threats ParksWatch classifies this protected area as vulnerable, meaning that there is a high risk that the area will fail to protect and maintain biological diversity in the medium-term future if current trends
    [Show full text]