DOCSLIB.ORG

And IRF3 Activation Enabling TRAF3/TBK1 Complex Formation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
And IRF3 Activation Enabling TRAF3/TBK1 Complex Formation DOK3 Is Required for IFN-β Production by Enabling TRAF3/TBK1 Complex Formation and IRF3 Activation This information is current as Susana Soo-Yeon Kim, Koon-Guan Lee, Ching-Siang Chin, of September 25, 2021. Say-Kong Ng, Natasha Ann Pereira, Shengli Xu and Kong-Peng Lam J Immunol 2014; 193:840-848; Prepublished online 13 June 2014; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1301601 Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/content/193/2/840 Supplementary http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2014/06/13/jimmunol.130160 Material 1.DCSupplemental http://www.jimmunol.org/ References This article cites 33 articles, 19 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/193/2/840.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision by guest on September 25, 2021 • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2014 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology DOK3 Is Required for IFN-b Production by Enabling TRAF3/TBK1 Complex Formation and IRF3 Activation Susana Soo-Yeon Kim,*,† Koon-Guan Lee,† Ching-Siang Chin,† Say-Kong Ng,† Natasha Ann Pereira,† Shengli Xu,† and Kong-Peng Lam*,†,‡ The downstream of kinase (DOK) family of adaptors is generally involved in the negative regulation of signaling pathways. DOK1, 2, and 3 were shown to attenuate TLR4 signaling by inhibiting Ras-ERK activation. In this study, we elucidated a novel role for DOK3 in IFN-b production. Macrophages lacking DOK3 were impaired in IFN-b synthesis upon influenza virus infection or polyinosinic-polyribocytidylic acid stimulation. In the absence of DOK3, the transcription factor IFN regulatory factor 3 was not phosphorylated and could not translocate to the nucleus to activate ifn-b gene expression. Interestingly, polyinosinic- polyribocytidylic acid–induced formation of the upstream TNFR-associated factor (TRAF) 3/TANK-binding kinase (TBK) 1 2 2 complex was compromised in dok3 / macrophages. DOK3 was shown to bind TBK1 and was required for its activation. Downloaded from Furthermore, we demonstrated that overexpression of DOK3 and TBK1 could significantly enhance ifn-b promoter activity. DOK3 was also shown to bind TRAF3, and the binding of TRAF3 and TBK1 to DOK3 required the tyrosine-rich C-terminal domain of DOK3. We further revealed that DOK3 was phosphorylated by Bruton’s tyrosine kinase. Hence, DOK3 plays a critical and positive role in TLR3 signaling by enabling TRAF3/TBK1 complex formation and facilitating TBK1 and IFN regulatory factor 3 activation and the induction of IFN-b production. The Journal of Immunology, 2014, 193: 840–848. http://www.jimmunol.org/ he downstream of kinase (DOK) family of adaptors (6). DOK3 was also shown to have an inhibitory role as it restricts comprises seven structurally related proteins with each Ca2+ (7) and JNK (8) activation in B cell receptor signaling. T possessing an NH2-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH), Unlike B cells, which express DOK1 and 3, and T cells, which a central phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB), and a C-terminal express DOK1 and 2, myeloid cells express all three DOK adap- tyrosine-rich domain (1). DOK1–3 are preferentially expressed tors (1). The role of DOK proteins in myeloid cells is beginning in hematopoietic cells whereas DOK4–7 are found in neural and to be unraveled, and there is increasing evidence to indicate that other cell types (2). As these proteins have no catalytic activity, they are involved in TLR signaling and innate immunity. TLRs are they function mainly as adaptors to facilitate protein–protein pattern recognition receptors that bind pathogen-associated mo- by guest on September 25, 2021 interactions and possibly also as scaffolds to nucleate protein lecular patterns found on microbes (9). Examples of pathogen- complexes in signal transduction pathways. Recently, DOK1–3 associated molecular patterns include the bacterial cell wall com- were identified as tumor suppressors for lung cancer in human and ponent LPS that is recognized by TLR4 and viral dsRNA that is mice (3) and shown to play a role in preventing the development detected by TLR3 (10). DOK1 and 2 have been shown to participate of aggressive histiocytic sarcoma (4). in TLR4 signaling by negatively regulating ERK activation and Accumulating data suggest that DOK1–3 function to limit protein TNF-a production in LPS-stimulated macrophages (11). Recently, tyrosine kinase–mediated signaling in immune cells (5). In partic- DOK3 was also demonstrated to negatively regulate LPS-induced ular, DOK1 and 2 have been characterized as negative regulators of ERK activation and the production of inflammatory cytokines in Ras-ERK signaling downstream of Ag receptors in B and T cells macrophages (12). Thus, it seems that DOK1–3 act similarly to inhibit TLR4 signaling in macrophages. *Department of Pediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Whereas DOK1 and 2 were shown not to regulate TLR3 signaling Singapore, Singapore 119228; †Bioprocessing Technology Institute, Agency for Sci- ence, Technology and Research, Singapore 138668; and ‡Department of Microbiol- (11), the role of DOK3 in TLR3 signal transduction remains to be ogy, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore determined. TLR3 recognition of viral dsRNA or its synthetic an- 119228 alog, polyinosinic-polyribocytidylic acid [poly(I:C)] activates the Received for publication June 19, 2013. Accepted for publication May 13, 2014. TRIF-dependent signaling pathway, resulting in IFN-b production. This work was supported by the Agency for Science Technology and Research/ This signaling cascade leads to the formation of the TNFR- Biomedical Research Council. associated factor (TRAF) 3/TANK-binding kinase (TBK) 1 com- S.S.-Y.K., K.-G.L., C.-S.C., S.-K.N., N.A.P., and S.X. performed research; K.-P.L. conceptualized the project; and S.S.-Y.K., K.-G.L., and K.-P.L. analyzed data and plex and activation of TBK1 that subsequently leads to the phos- wrote the paper. phorylation and activation of the transcription factor IFN regulatory Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Kong-Peng Lam, Bioprocessing Tech- factor (IRF) 3 (13). Activated IRF3 dimerizes and translocates from nology Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, No. 06-01, Centros, 20 the cytoplasm to the nucleus to drive ifn-b mRNA synthesis (14). Biopolis Way, Singapore 138668. E-mail address: [email protected] Interestingly, dok3 mRNA was reported to be upregulated in The online version of this article contains supplemental material. virus-infected cells (15). This is in contrast to the demonstrated Abbreviations used in this article: BTK, Bruton’s tyrosine kinase; DOK, down- degradation of DOK1–3 proteins in LPS-stimulated macrophages stream of kinase; HA, hemagglutinin; HDAC1, histone deacetylase 1; IRF, IFN regula- tory factor; NS, nonstructural; PH, pleckstrin homology; poly(I:C), polyinosinic- (12), suggesting that DOK3 could have a different role in TLR3 polyribocytidylic acid; PTB, phosphotyrosine-binding; TBK, TANK-binding kinase; activation in macrophages. In this study, we examined the involve- TRAF, TNFR-associated factor; WT, wild-type. ment of DOK3 in TLR3 signaling and showed that the adaptor was Copyright Ó 2014 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. 0022-1767/14/$16.00 phosphorylated upon poly(I:C) stimulation and played a critical www.jimmunol.org/cgi/doi/10.4049/jimmunol.1301601 The Journal of Immunology 841 role in TLR3-triggered IFN-b production. More importantly, we virus, 59-AAGGGCTTTCACCGAAGAGG-39 and 59-CCCATTCTCAT- demonstrate that DOK3 is needed for the induction of IRF3 by TACTGCTTC-39. facilitating the formation of the upstream TRAF3/TBK1 complex Transfection and reporter assays and the activation of TBK1 and IRF3. HEK293T cells (1 3 105) were seeded in 48-well dishes (Costar) and transfected the following day using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Empty control plasmid was added to ensure that each transfection received Materials and Methods the same amount of total DNA. To normalize for transfection efficiency, Mice, cells, and plasmids 100 ng pRL-TK (Renilla luciferase) reporter plasmid was added to each 2 2 transfection. Approximately 18 h after transfection, luciferase assays were Wild-type C57BL/6 and dok3 / mice were bred in our facilities 2 2 performed using a dual-specific luciferase assay kit (Promega). The IFN-b whereasBruton’styrosinekinase(btk) / mice were obtained from The 2 2 2 2 promoter luciferase reporter plasmid was obtained from Dr. Di Wang Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). tlr3 / and trif / mice were (Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China). provided by Osamu Takeuchi and Shizuo Akira (Osaka University, Osaka, Japan). Experiments with mice were performed according to guide ELISA lines from the National Advisory Committee on Laboratory Animal Research. Macrophages were differentiated from bone marrow as pre- Untreated or naked poly(I:C)-stimulated or influenza virus–infected WT 2 2 viously described (16). HEK293T cells were transfected with recombi- and dok3 / macrophages were cultured in six-well plates at 5 3 106 nant vectors encoding murine TLR3, DOK3, TRAF, TBK1, TRIF, BTK,or cells/ml. Supernatants were harvested and assayed for cytokine produc- various truncated and site-directed mutants (Stratagene) with hemag- tion. The concentrations of IL-12p40, TNF-a (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, glutinin (HA), FLAG, or GFP tag using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, CA), IFN-b (PBL InterferonSource), and RANTES (R&D Systems) were Grand Island, NY).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Expression of the Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-Associated Factors
    Expression of the Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor- Associated Factors (TRAFs) 1 and 2 is a Characteristic Feature of Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg Cells Keith F. Izban, M.D., Melek Ergin, M.D, Robert L. Martinez, B.A., HT(ASCP), Serhan Alkan, M.D. Department of Pathology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois the HD cell lines. Although KMH2 showed weak Tumor necrosis factor receptor–associated factors expression, the remaining HD cell lines also lacked (TRAFs) are a recently established group of proteins TRAF5 protein. These data demonstrate that consti- involved in the intracellular signal transduction of tutive expression of TRAF1 and TRAF2 is a charac- several members of the tumor necrosis factor recep- teristic feature of HRS cells from both patient and tor (TNFR) superfamily. Recently, specific members cell line specimens. Furthermore, with the excep- of the TRAF family have been implicated in promot- tion of TRAF1 expression, HRS cells from the three ing cell survival as well as activation of the tran- HD cell lines showed similar TRAF protein expres- ␬ scription factor NF- B. We investigated the consti- sion patterns. Overall, these findings demonstrate tutive expression of TRAF1 and TRAF2 in Hodgkin the expression of several TRAF proteins in HD. Sig- and Reed–Sternberg (HRS) cells from archived nificantly, the altered regulation of selective TRAF paraffin-embedded tissues obtained from 21 pa- proteins may reflect HRS cell response to stimula- tients diagnosed with classical Hodgkin’s disease tion from the microenvironment and potentially (HD). In a selective portion of cases, examination of contribute both to apoptosis resistance and cell HRS cells for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)–encoded maintenance of HRS cells.
    [Show full text]
  • A Network Model of Early Events in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling That Accounts for Combinatorial Complexity Michael L
    BioSystems 83 (2006) 136–151 A network model of early events in epidermal growth factor receptor signaling that accounts for combinatorial complexity Michael L. Blinov, James R. Faeder, Byron Goldstein, William S. Hlavacek ∗ Theoretical Biology and Biophysics Group, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA Received 8 January 2005; received in revised form 6 May 2005; accepted 21 June 2005 Abstract We consider a model of early events in signaling by the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR). The model includes EGF, EGFR, the adapter proteins Grb2 and Shc, and the guanine nucleotide exchange factor Sos, which is activated through EGF- induced formation of EGFR–Grb2–Sos and EGFR–Shc–Grb2–Sos assemblies at the plasma membrane. The protein interactions involved in signaling can potentially generate a diversity of protein complexes and phosphoforms; however, this diversity has been largely ignored in models of EGFR signaling. Here, we develop a model that accounts more fully for potential molecular diversity by specifying rules for protein interactions and then using these rules to generate a reaction network that includes all chemical species and reactions implied by the protein interactions. We obtain a model that predicts the dynamics of 356 molecular species, which are connected through 3749 unidirectional reactions. This network model is compared with a previously developed model that includes only 18 chemical species but incorporates the same scope of protein interactions. The predictions of this model are reproduced by the network model, which also yields new predictions. For example, the network model predicts distinct temporal patterns of autophosphorylation for different tyrosine residues of EGFR.
    [Show full text]
  • Expression and Prognostic Role of IKBKE and TBK1 in Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Cancer Management and Research Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article ORIGINAL RESEARCH Expression and prognostic role of IKBKE and TBK1 in stage I non-small cell lung cancer This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Cancer Management and Research Xin Wang1,2 Background: The inhibitors of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit epsilon (IKBKE) and Feifei Teng2 TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) are important members of the nonclassical IKK family that Jie Lu3 share the kinase domain. They are important oncogenes for activation of several signaling Dianbin Mu4 pathways in several tumors. This study aims to explore the expression of IKBKE and TBK1 Jianbo Zhang4 and their prognostic role in stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Jinming Yu1,2 Patients and methods: A total of 142 surgically resected stage I NSCLC patients were enrolled and immunohistochemistry of IKBKE and TBK1 was performed. 1 Department of Oncology, Renmin Results: IKBKE and TBK1 were expressed in 121 (85.2%) and 114 (80.3%) of stage I Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, fi Hubei 430060, People’s Republic of China; NSCLC patients respectively. IKBKE expression was signi cantly associated with TBK1 2Department of Radiation Oncology, expression (P=0.004). Furthermore, multivariate regression analyses showed there was a fi Shandong Cancer Hospital Af liated to significant relationship between patients with risk factors, the recurrence pattern of metas- Shandong University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong tasis and IKBKE+/TBK1+ co-expression (P=0.032 and P=0.022, respectively). In Kaplan– 250117, People’s Republic of China; Meier survival curve analyses, the IKBKE+/TBK1+ co-expression subgroup was signifi- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Shandong Province Qianfoshan Hospital of Shandong cantly associated with poor overall survival (P=0.014).
    [Show full text]
  • HER2 Stabilizes EGFR and Itself by Altering Autophosphorylation Patterns in a Manner That Overcomes Regulatory Mechanisms and Pr
    Oncogene (2013) 32, 4169–4180 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/13 www.nature.com/onc ORIGINAL ARTICLE HER2 stabilizes EGFR and itself by altering autophosphorylation patterns in a manner that overcomes regulatory mechanisms and promotes proliferative and transformation signaling Z Hartman1, H Zhao1 and YM Agazie1,2 One of the causes of breast cancer is overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Enhanced receptor autophosphorylation and resistance to activation-induced downregulation have been suggested as mechanisms for HER2-induced sustained signaling and cell transformation. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying these possibilities remain incompletely understood. In the current report, we present evidence that show that HER2 overexpression does not lead to receptor hyper-autophosphorylation, but alters patterns in a manner that favors receptor stability and sustained signaling. Specifically, HER2 overexpression blocks epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine phosphorylation on Y1045 and Y1068, the known docking sites of c-Cbl and Grb2, respectively, whereas promoting phosphorylation on Y1173, the known docking site of the Gab adaptor proteins and phospholipase C gamma. Under these conditions, HER2 itself is phosphorylated on Y1221/1222, with no known role, and on Y1248 that corresponds to Y1173 of EGFR. Interestingly, suppressed EGFR autophosphorylation on the Grb2 and c-Cbl-binding sites correlated with receptor stability and sustained signaling, suggesting that HER2 accomplishes these tasks by altering autophosphorylation patterns. In conformity with these findings, mutation of the Grb2-binding site on EGFR (Y1068F–EGFR) conferred resistance to ligand-induced degradation, which in turn induced sustained signaling, and increased cell proliferation and transformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear TRAF3 Is a Negative Regulator of CREB in B Cells
    Nuclear TRAF3 is a negative regulator of CREB in B cells Nurbek Mambetsarieva,b,c,1, Wai W. Linb,1, Laura L. Stunza,d, Brett M. Hansona, Joanne M. Hildebranda,2, and Gail A. Bishopa,b,d,e,f,3 aDepartment of Microbiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242; bImmunology Graduate Program, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242; cMedical Scientist Training Program, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242; dHolden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242; eInternal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242; and fDepartment of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Research (151), Iowa City, IA 52246 Edited by Louis M. Staudt, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, and approved December 14, 2015 (received for review July 23, 2015) The adaptor protein TNF receptor-associated factor 3 (TRAF3) regu- deficient T cells and macrophages lack the enhanced survival phe- lates signaling through B-lymphocyte receptors, including CD40, notype, although they display constitutive NF-κB2 activation (12, BAFF receptor, and Toll-like receptors, and also plays a critical role 13). TRAF3 degradation is neither necessary nor sufficient for B-cell inhibiting B-cell homoeostatic survival. Consistent withthesefindings, NF-κB2 activation (14). These findings indicate that TRAF3 regu- loss-of-function human TRAF3 mutations are common in B-cell cancers, lates additional important prosurvival pathways in B cells. particularly multiple myeloma and B-cell lymphoma. B cells of B-cell– Nuclear localization of TRAF3 has been reported in several specific TRAF3−/− mice (B-Traf3−/−) display remarkably enhanced sur- nonhematopoietic cell types (15, 16), but the function of TRAF3 vival compared with littermate control (WT) B cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Workflows for Rapid Functional Annotation of Diverse
    insects Article Workflows for Rapid Functional Annotation of Diverse Arthropod Genomes Surya Saha 1,2 , Amanda M. Cooksey 2,3, Anna K. Childers 4 , Monica F. Poelchau 5 and Fiona M. McCarthy 2,* 1 Boyce Thompson Institute, 533 Tower Rd., Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; [email protected] 2 School of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, 1117 E. Lowell St., Tucson, AZ 85721, USA; [email protected] 3 CyVerse, BioScience Research Laboratories, University of Arizona, 1230 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ 85721, USA 4 Bee Research Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, 10300 Baltimore Ave., Beltsville, MD 20705, USA; [email protected] 5 National Agricultural Library, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, 10301 Baltimore Ave., Beltsville, MD 20705, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: fi[email protected] Simple Summary: Genomic technologies are accumulating information about genes faster than ever before, and sequencing initiatives, such as the Earth BioGenome Project, i5k, and Ag100Pest Initiative, are expected to increase this rate of acquisition. However, if genomic sequencing is to be used for the improvement of human health, agriculture, and our understanding of biological systems, it is necessary to identify genes and understand how they contribute to biological outcomes. While there are several well-established workflows for assembling genomic sequences and identifying genes, understanding gene function is essential to create actionable knowledge. Moreover, this functional annotation process must be easily accessible and provide information at a genomic scale to keep up Citation: Saha, S.; Cooksey, A.M.; with new sequence data. We report a well-defined workflow for rapid functional annotation of whole Childers, A.K.; Poelchau, M.F.; proteomes to produce Gene Ontology and pathways information.
    [Show full text]
  • Paxillin: a Crossroad in Pathological Cell Migration Ana María López-Colomé*, Irene Lee-Rivera, Regina Benavides-Hidalgo and Edith López
    López-Colomé et al. Journal of Hematology & Oncology (2017) 10:50 DOI 10.1186/s13045-017-0418-y REVIEW Open Access Paxillin: a crossroad in pathological cell migration Ana María López-Colomé*, Irene Lee-Rivera, Regina Benavides-Hidalgo and Edith López Abstract Paxilllin is a multifunctional and multidomain focal adhesion adapter protein which serves an important scaffolding role at focal adhesions by recruiting structural and signaling molecules involved in cell movement and migration, when phosphorylated on specific Tyr and Ser residues. Upon integrin engagement with extracellular matrix, paxillin is phosphorylated at Tyr31, Tyr118, Ser188, and Ser190, activating numerous signaling cascades which promote cell migration, indicating that the regulation of adhesion dynamics is under the control of a complex display of signaling mechanisms. Among them, paxillin disassembly from focal adhesions induced by extracellular regulated kinase (ERK)- mediated phosphorylation of serines 106, 231, and 290 as well as the binding of the phosphatase PEST to paxillin have been shown to play a key role in cell migration. Paxillin also coordinates the spatiotemporal activation of signaling molecules, including Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA GTPases, by recruiting GEFs, GAPs, and GITs to focal adhesions. As a major participant in the regulation of cell movement, paxillin plays distinct roles in specific tissues and developmental stages and is involved in immune response, epithelial morphogenesis, and embryonic development. Importantly, paxillin is also an essential player in pathological conditions including oxidative stress, inflammation, endothelial cell barrier dysfunction, and cancer development and metastasis. Keywords: Cancer, Focal adhesions, Cell migration, Signal transduction Background gene transcription, thus acting as a direct link from the Paxillin is a main component of focal adhesions (FAs) and plasma membrane and the cytoskeleton to the nucleus [5].
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Basis of Tank-Binding Kinase 1 Activation by Transautophosphorylation
    Molecular basis of Tank-binding kinase 1 activation by transautophosphorylation Xiaolei Maa,1, Elizabeth Helgasonb,1, Qui T. Phungc, Clifford L. Quanb, Rekha S. Iyera, Michelle W. Leec, Krista K. Bowmana, Melissa A. Starovasnika, and Erin C. Dueberb,2 Departments of aStructural Biology, bEarly Discovery Biochemistry, and cProtein Chemistry, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA 94080 Edited by Tony Hunter, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, and approved April 25, 2012 (received for review December 30, 2011) Tank-binding kinase (TBK)1 plays a central role in innate immunity: it the C-terminal scaffolding/dimerization domain (SDD), a do- serves as an integrator of multiple signals induced by receptor- main arrangement that appears to be shared among the IKK mediated pathogen detection and as a modulator of IFN levels. family of kinases (3). Deletion or mutation of the ULD in TBK1 Efforts to better understand the biology of this key immunological or IKKε severely impairs kinase activation and substrate phos- factor have intensified recently as growing evidence implicates phorylation in cells (22, 23). Furthermore, the integrity of the aberrant TBK1 activity in a variety of autoimmune diseases and ULD in IKKβ is not only required for kinase activity (24) but was fi cancers. Nevertheless, key molecular details of TBK1 regulation and shown also to confer substrate speci city in conjunction with the β substrate selection remain unanswered. Here, structures of phos- adjacent SDD (25). Recent crystal structures of the IKK phorylated and unphosphorylated human TBK1 kinase and ubiq- homodimer demonstrate that the ULD and SDD form a joint, uitin-like domains, combined with biochemical studies, indicate three-way interface with the KD within each protomer of the a molecular mechanism of activation via transautophosphorylation.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded As a CSV Dump file
    cells Article Transcriptome and Methylome Analysis Reveal Complex Cross-Talks between Thyroid Hormone and Glucocorticoid Signaling at Xenopus Metamorphosis Nicolas Buisine 1,† , Alexis Grimaldi 1,†, Vincent Jonchere 1,† , Muriel Rigolet 1, Corinne Blugeon 2 , Juliette Hamroune 2 and Laurent Marc Sachs 1,* 1 UMR7221 Molecular Physiology and Adaption, CNRS, Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 57 Rue Cuvier, CEDEX 05, 75231 Paris, France; [email protected] (N.B.); [email protected] (A.G.); [email protected] (V.J.); [email protected] (M.R.) 2 Genomics Core Facility, Département de Biologie, Institut de Biologie de l’ENS (IBENS), École Normale Supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, 75005 Paris, France; [email protected] (C.B.); [email protected] (J.H.) * Correspondence: [email protected] † Co-first authors, alphabetic order. Abstract: Background: Most work in endocrinology focus on the action of a single hormone, and very little on the cross-talks between two hormones. Here we characterize the nature of interactions between thyroid hormone and glucocorticoid signaling during Xenopus tropicalis metamorphosis. Methods: We used functional genomics to derive genome wide profiles of methylated DNA and measured changes of gene expression after hormonal treatments of a highly responsive tissue, tailfin. Clustering classified the data into four types of biological responses, and biological networks were Citation: Buisine, N.; Grimaldi, A.; modeled by system biology. Results: We found that gene expression is mostly regulated by either Jonchere, V.; Rigolet, M.; Blugeon, C.; T or CORT, or their additive effect when they both regulate the same genes. A small but non- Hamroune, J.; Sachs, L.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms of IKBKE Activation in Cancer Sridevi Challa University of South Florida, [email protected]
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 1-29-2017 Mechanisms of IKBKE Activation in Cancer Sridevi Challa University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Biochemistry Commons, Biology Commons, and the Cell Biology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Challa, Sridevi, "Mechanisms of IKBKE Activation in Cancer" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/6617 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mechanisms of IKBKE Activation in Cancer by Sridevi Challa A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Cell Biology, Microbiology, and Molecular Biology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Mokenge P. Malafa, M.D. Gary Reuther, Ph.D. Eric Lau, Ph.D. Domenico Coppola, M.D. Date of Approval: January 12, 2017 Keywords: EGFR, Olaparib, resistance Copyright © 2017, Sridevi Challa DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my kind and courageous mother. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to acknowledge Dr. Cheng for trusting me with completion of the projects. I would like to thank him for giving me the freedom to explore any aspect of research and always willing to provide the necessary resources and guidance for my projects. I want to also acknowledge Ted and the Cheng lab personnel for their support.
    [Show full text]
  • Crystallographic Analysis of CD40 Recognition and Signaling by Human TRAF2
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 96, pp. 8408–8413, July 1999 Biochemistry Crystallographic analysis of CD40 recognition and signaling by human TRAF2 SARAH M. MCWHIRTER*, STEVEN S. PULLEN†,JAMES M. HOLTON*, JAMES J. CRUTE†,MARILYN R. KEHRY†, AND TOM ALBER*‡ *Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3206, and †Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT 06877-0368 Communicated by Peter S. Kim, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, May 26, 1999 (received for review April 25, 1999) ABSTRACT Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily proteins (8, 9). The biological selectivity of signaling also relies members convey signals that promote diverse cellular re- on the oligomerization specificity and receptor affinity of the sponses. Receptor trimerization by extracellular ligands ini- TRAFs. tiates signaling by recruiting members of the tumor necrosis The TNF receptor superfamily member, CD40, mediates factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF) family of adapter diverse responses. In antigen-presenting cells that constitu- proteins to the receptor cytoplasmic domains. We report the tively express CD40, it plays a critical role in T cell-dependent 2.4-Å crystal structure of a 22-kDa, receptor-binding fragment immune responses (10). TRAF1, TRAF2, TRAF3, and of TRAF2 complexed with a functionally defined peptide from TRAF6 binding sites in the 62-aa, CD40 cytoplasmic domain the cytoplasmic domain of the CD40 receptor. TRAF2 forms have been mapped (7, 11). TRAF1, TRAF2, and TRAF3 bind a mushroom-shaped trimer consisting of a coiled coil and a to the same sequence, 250PVQET, and TRAF6 binds to the unique ␤-sandwich domain. Both domains mediate trimer- membrane-proximal sequence, 231QEPQEINF.
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Type-Specific Function of TRAF2 and TRAF3 in Regulating Type I IFN
    Xie et al. Cell Biosci (2019) 9:5 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-018-0268-5 Cell & Bioscience RESEARCH Open Access Cell type‑specifc function of TRAF2 and TRAF3 in regulating type I IFN induction Xiaoping Xie1, Jin Jin2, Lele Zhu1, Zuliang Jie1, Yanchuan Li1, Baoyu Zhao3, Xuhong Cheng1, Pingwei Li3 and Shao‑Cong Sun1,4* Abstract Background: TRAF3 is known as a central mediator of type I interferon (IFN) induction by various pattern recognition receptors, but the in vivo function of TRAF3 in host defense against viral infection is poorly defned due to the lack of a viable mouse model. Results: Here we show that mice carrying conditional deletion of TRAF3 in myeloid cells or dendritic cells do not have a signifcant defect in host defense against vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) infection. However, whole-body inducible deletion of TRAF3 renders mice more sensitive to VSV infection. Consistently, TRAF3 was essential for type I IFN induction in mouse embryonic fbroblasts (MEFs) but not in macrophages. In dendritic cells, TRAF3 was required for type I IFN induction by TLR ligands but not by viruses. We further show that the IFN-regulating function is not unique to TRAF3, since TRAF2 is an essential mediator of type I IFN induction in several cell types, including mac‑ rophages, DCs, and MEFs. Conclusions: These fndings suggest that both TRAF2 and TRAF3 play a crucial role in type I IFN induction, but their functions are cell type- and stimulus-specifc. Keywords: TRAF2, TRAF3, Type I interferon, Antiviral immunity Background IPS-1) serves as an adaptor of RLRs, whereas stimulator Type I interferon (IFN) plays a crucial role in innate of interferon gene (STING) mediates type I IFN induc- immunity against viral infections [1, 2].
    [Show full text]