United States District Court Northern District of California ROHINI

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

United States District Court Northern District of California ROHINI Case4:14-cv-02411-YGR Document50 Filed02/03/15 Page1 of 10 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 ROHINI KUMAR, individually and on behalf of Case No.: 14-CV-2411- YGR the general public and those similarly situated, 8 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN 9 Plaintiff, PART MOTION TO DISMISS 10 vs. 11 SALOV NORTH AMERICA CORP., 12 Defendants. 13 14 Plaintiff Rohini Kumar brings this putative class action against Defendant Salov North 15 America Corp. alleging claims for: (1) violation of the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act 16 (“CLRA”), California Civil Code § 1750, et. seq.; (2) violation of the California False Advertising 17 Law(“FAL”), Business and Professions Code § 17500, et. seq.; (3) breach of contract; (4) breach of United States District Court Northern District of California California Northern District of 18 the covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (5) fraud, deceit and/or misrepresentation; and (6) 19 violation of the California Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Business and Professions Code § 20 17500, et. seq. Salov has filed a Motion to Dismiss on the grounds that Kumar lacks standing, has 21 not alleged plausible claims, failed to plead fraud with particularity, and failed to set forth sufficient 22 facts to state a claim for breach of contract. 23 Having carefully considered the papers submitted, the arguments made at the hearing on this 24 matter, and the pleadings in this action, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court ORDERS that 25 the Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. While Plaintiff has sufficiently alleged 26 claims for violation of the CLRA, FAL, and UCL, as well as a claim for fraud and deceit, the 27 allegations in support of breach of contract, and covenant of good faith and fair dealing claims do not 28 Case4:14-cv-02411-YGR Document50 Filed02/03/15 Page2 of 10 1 set forth a cognizable basis for relief since there is no authority for finding privity of contract under 2 the circumstances alleged. 3 I. BACKGROUND 4 Defendant Salov imports, markets, and sells several different types of olive oil under its 5 “Filippo Berio” brand, including: “Robusto Extra Virgin Olive Oil,” “Extra Virgin Olive Oil,” 6 “Delicato Extra Virgin Olive Oil,” “Organic Extra Virgin Olive Oil,” “Olive Oil,” and “Extra Light 7 Olive Oil.” (Complaint, Dkt. No. 1, at ¶ 17.) The words “Imported from Italy” appear prominently 8 on the front label of each product. (Id. at ¶ 23.) However, a smaller statement on the back of the 9 products indicates that the olives are grown, and pressed, in many other countries, such as Spain, 10 Greece, and Tunisia, and the oils are shipped to Italy where they are blended and bottled for export. 11 (Id.) Kumar alleges that the “Imported from Italy” statement on the product labels is false and 12 violates federal regulations concerning country of origin and misbranding of food products. (Id. at 13 ¶¶ 24-26.) 14 In addition, on two varieties of Salov’s products (“Extra Virgin Olive Oil” and “Organic 15 Extra Virgin Olive Oil”), the label contains the term “Extra Virgin,” a descriptor reserved for the 16 highest grade and quality of olive oil. (Complaint at ¶ 27.) The International Olive Council, the 17 United States Department of Agriculture and the State of California all maintain standards for use of 18 the term “extra virgin” in olive oil. (Id. at ¶¶ 27-30.) Kumar alleges that her counsel, in March of United States District Court Northern District of California California Northern District of 19 2014, had several bottles of Salov’s “Extra Virgin” products tested in an independent lab, which 20 found that none of the sampled products met extra virgin standards. (Id. at ¶ 31.) Kumar alleges that 21 Salov: (1) adulterates its olive oil with cheaper, refined olive oil; and (2) uses substandard, non-light 22 protective (clear) bottles and unprotected transport/storage methods which allow the oil to degrade. 23 As a consequence, the products do not meet the “extra virgin” standard at the time of sale or the 24 “Best By” date on the package. (Id. at ¶¶ 35-38.) 25 Kumar alleges that she purchased a bottle Filippo Berio Extra Virgin Olive Oil at a Safeway 26 in Berkeley, California, for approximately $6.00. (Complaint at ¶ 48.) She alleges that she later 27 learned that the product she purchased was not extra virgin and was not made from olives grown and 28 pressed in Italy. (Id. at ¶ 49.) She alleges that she relied on the statements on the label to assure that 2 Case4:14-cv-02411-YGR Document50 Filed02/03/15 Page3 of 10 1 she was purchasing extra virgin olive oil that was made from olives grown and pressed in Italy. (Id. 2 at ¶ 47.) But for Salov’s misrepresentations on the label, she would not have purchased the product 3 or, at a minimum, would have paid less for the product she purchased. (Id. at ¶ 48.) Kumar seeks to 4 represent three putative classes defined as follows: 5 All persons who, between May 23, 2010, and the present, purchased, in California, 6 any of Salov’s products labeled as “Imported from Italy” (the “California Italian Class”); 7 All persons who, between May 23, 2010 and the present, purchased, in the United 8 States, any of Salov’s products labeled as “Extra Virgin” (the “EVOO Class”); and All members of the EVOO Class who made their purchases in California (the 9 “California EVOO Subclass”). 10 II. APPLICABLE STANDARDS 11 Salov moves under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 12 challenging the legal sufficiency of the claims alleged. “Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) 13 requires only a ‘short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief,’ 14 in order to ‘give the defendant fair notice of what the claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.’” 15 Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 554 (2007) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2)). Even 16 under the liberal pleading standard of Rule 8(a)(2), “a plaintiff’s obligation to provide the grounds of 17 his entitlement to relief requires more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the 18 elements of a cause of action will not do.” Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555 (citing Papasan v. Allain, 478 United States District Court Northern District of California California Northern District of 19 U.S. 265, 286 (1986) (internal brackets and quotation marks omitted)). The Court will not assume 20 facts not alleged, nor will it draw unwarranted inferences. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 679 21 (2009) (“Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for relief… [is] a context-specific 22 task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial experience and common sense.”). 23 Rule 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that “[i]n allegations of fraud or 24 mistake, a party must state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake.” To 25 satisfy the rule, a plaintiff must allege the “who, what, where, when, and how” of the charged 26 misconduct. Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. U.S.A., 317 F.3d 1097, 1106 (9th Cir. 2003). “[T]he 27 circumstances constituting the alleged fraud must be specific enough to give defendants notice of the 28 3 Case4:14-cv-02411-YGR Document50 Filed02/03/15 Page4 of 10 1 particular misconduct so that they can defend against the charge and not just deny that they have 2 done anything wrong.” Id. 3 Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), a complaint may be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon 4 which relief may be granted against that defendant. Dismissal may be based on either “the lack of a 5 cognizable legal theory or the absence of sufficient facts alleged under a cognizable legal theory.” 6 Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1988) (citing Robertson v. Dean 7 Witter Reynolds, Inc., 749 F.2d 530, 533-34 (9th Cir. 1984)). The complaint must plead “enough 8 facts to state a claim [for] relief that is plausible on its face.” Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570. A claim is 9 plausible on its face “when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the 10 reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 11 678. If the facts alleged do not support a reasonable inference of liability, stronger than a mere 12 possibility, the claim must be dismissed. Id. at 678–79; see also In re Gilead Scis. Sec. Litig., 536 13 F.3d 1049, 1055 (9th Cir. 2008) (the court is not required to accept as true “allegations that are 14 merely conclusory, unwarranted deductions of fact, or unreasonable inferences”). 15 A motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction may be made on the grounds that 16 the lack of jurisdiction appears from the “face of the complaint,” or may be based on extrinsic 17 evidence apart from the pleadings. Warren v. Fox Family Worldwide, Inc., 328 F.3d 1136, 1139 (9th 18 Cir. 2003). Where the jurisdictional issue is whether the plaintiff has standing, dismissal is also United States District Court Northern District of California California Northern District of 19 appropriate under Rule 12(b)(6) absent sufficient factual allegations in the complaint, which, if 20 proven, would confer standing.
Recommended publications
  • Gallo Luis Dias Final Draft, JAN 6
    A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Masters Degree in Management from NOVA – School of Business and Economics. ENTERPRISE COMPETITIVENESS: INTERNATIONALIZATION STRATEGY Internationalization Process of Gallo Worldwide: Introduction of Olive Oil in a Non-Traditional Market- China Luis Botelho Moniz Patricio Dias #1231 A Project carried out on the Management course, under the supervision of: Prof. Sónia Dahab 6th January 2014 Index Index ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 2 Firm Description ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Gallo’s Value Chain ................................................................................................................................. 3 Gallo’s Competitive Advantages in Portugal ................................................................................. 5 Porters’ Five Forces to Shanghai Region ........................................................................................ 6 Threat of new entrances- Moderate ......................................................................................................... 6 Threat of substitute products- High ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The European Market Potential for Olive Oil 1. Product Description
    The European market potential for olive oil In the long term, the European market for olive oil is expected to show stable growth of 3%–5% over the next five years. This growth is mostly driven by changes in the consumption patterns of European consumers, like the rising interest in healthier cooking and the Mediterranean diet. The best opportunities for developing country suppliers can be found in France, the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Belgium. Contents of this page 1. Product description 2. What makes Europe an interesting market for olive oil? 3. Which European countries offer most opportunities for olive oil exporters? 4. Which trends offer opportunities on the European olive oil market? 1. Product description Olive oil is a vegetable oil obtained from the fruit of the olive tree (Olea europaea). Olive oil can be produced by physical and mechanical means, or by chemical means. Most olive oils are produced by physical and mechanical means, through operations such as grinding, pressing, centrifugation and physical filtration. Olive oil can also be produced by chemical means, with the use of solvents, but those methods negatively affect quality. Depending on the production method, the composition and sensory characteristics of olive oil can be classified in several categories: Virgin olive oil – obtained solely by mechanical or other physical means. Virgin olive oils include several quality categories, such as extra virgin olive oil (with <0.8% free acidity), virgin olive oil (with 2%– 3.3% free acidity) and ordinary olive oil (with >3.3% free acidity). Olive oil that has more than 3.3% free acidity (also called ‘lampante’) is not fit for human consumption and must be refined before culinary use.
    [Show full text]
  • Title: the Country Image Added Value in the Retail Chain the Case Study of Tunisian Olive Oil Retail in Japan
    Title: The country image added value in the retail chain The case study of Tunisian olive oil retail in Japan Authors: Rim Jallouli Professor of marketing and innovation- University of Manouba - Tunisia Dean of the Higher School of Digital Economy President of the Tunisian Association of Digital Economy e-mail: [email protected] Address: ESEN, Campus Universitaire la Manouba, 2010, Tunisia Phone : (00 216) 71 602 919 Fax : (00 216) 71 602 662 Marwa Trabelsi Higher School of Digital Economy - University of Manouba - Tunisia Chonnikarn Luangpituksa University of Marketing and Distribution Sciences - Japan Hanen Nefzi Higher School of Commerce - University of Manouba - Tunisia 1 Title: The Country image added value in the retail chain The case study of Tunisian olive oil retail in Japan Abstract: This paper studies the contribution of “the image of country of origin” to the value creation for the entire chain of international distribution in the case of food products and more specifically the role of the web communication about “the country of origin” image in value creation for Asian and international retailers. First, this paper clarifies the concept of the country image in relation with new opportunities offered by the web marketing applications. Basing on the previous theoretical development, the second part presents the case study of the promotion of the Tunisia image to develop the exports of Tunisian olive oil to Japan: How well conceived websites of both government institutions and private actors (retailers, producers, exporters, and laboratories) could play a strategic role to develop and promote a positive association between “Tunisia” and the olive oil of good quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Time Winner of Marco Mugelli Award at LA International Extra Virgin Olive Oil Competition to Speak at Chicago Conference
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: North American Olive Oil Association (732) 922-3008 [email protected] Three Time Winner of Marco Mugelli Award at LA International Extra Virgin Olive Oil Competition to Speak at Chicago Conference Neptune, N.J. (June 15, 2017) -- Marco Scanu, Master Olive Oil Maker for Dievole from Italy will be presenting at The Olive Oil Conference in Chicago on July 18-20. Dievole has won the Marco Mugelli Award for the best extra virgin olive oil on show three years in a row. A true innovator in the processing of extra virgin olive oil, Marco Scanu has been instrumental in establishing the Dievole range of olive oils made near Sienna in Tuscany. Meeting and listening to Marco will provide inspiration and practical ideas to all producers of extra virgin olive in the US and elsewhere. The organizers thank this year’s generous conference supporters for making the event possible – Olive Oils from Spain, Deoleo North America (Bertolli), Filippo Berio, JCS Tradecom (Zoe) and Sovena USA. About the North American Olive Oil Association Established in 1989, the North American Olive Oil Association is a trade association of marketers, packagers and importers of olive oil in the United States, Canada and their respective suppliers abroad. The association strives to foster a better understanding of olive oil and its taste, versatility and health benefits. For more information visit www.AboutOliveOil.org and www.OliveOilConference.com. About International Extra Virgin Olive Oil Savantes Established in 2001, International Extra Virgin Olive Oil Savantes provides participants with the opportunity to develop and expand their tasting skills, knowledge and experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on the Promotion of the Consumption of Olive Oil and Table Olives in Russia
    Study on the promotion of the consumption of olive oil and table olives in Russia Client International Olive Council Date August-October 2009 1 Technical dossier by AGERÓN INTERNACIONAL international consultants ageron.es 2 Índex Executive summary 4 Size and characteristics of the market 17 Market access conditions 35 Foreign trade 42 Supply 76 Demand 91 Distribution channels 108 Media and promotional channels available 118 The scientific community 127 The culinary community 129 Promotion activities under way 132 Agencies 172 Conclusions 190 Recomendations 200 Annex 1 Size and characteristics of the market. General economic data 221 Annex 2 Legislation and certification agencies in Russia 226 Annex 3 Statistics 228 Annex 4 Storecheck 264 Annex 5 Proposal for tender specifications 408 Annex 6 List of interviewed 422 3 Promotion activities under way 132 Promotion by institutions After analyzing the market for these products in Russia and acquiring a better media perspective, it seems important to conduct a research of the promotional campaigns for these two products, both on going or recently developed in Russia. As we have seen, these products are imported and, therefore, are foreign to the cultural and culinary Russian tradition. This requires a particular promotion for the products, which can either originate in the exporting countries, their foreign trade organizations or established business associations, as well as from the industries which promote their brands in this market. We shall look into the promotions undertaken by Russian importers and distributors in order to foster the sale of these products. Current promotional campaigns have been researched in the course of the study undertaken by this project for the COI.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabo Agfocus – August 2012
    Rabo AgFocus – August 2012 Rabo AgFocus Rabobank International New World versus Old World Olive Oil - Winning in the U.S. Market with Quality Food & Agribusiness Research and Advisory • U.S. producers are expected to capture a 5 percent share of the growing [email protected] U.S. olive oil market by 2017. +1 559 447 7961 • Tightening U.S. olive oil standards are key to this growth if properly [email protected] +31 30 712 3821 enforced and consumers are educated on the merits of high quality olive oil. [email protected] • The greatest challenge is price competitiveness with Old World European +562 449 8531 global branded bottlers and private label suppliers flooding the U.S. [email protected] +612 8115 2446 market with inexpensive, lower quality Spanish product. • U.S. and other New World olive oil producers show promise long term to www.rabotransact.com secure a sustainable premium U.S. market niche, leveraging their high quality and efficiency advantages and following in the footsteps of now globally renowned California wines. Contents Introduction 1 Introduction Success of New World Competition is heating up in the large and growing United States olive oil market, now the Producers Depends on world’s third-largest in terms of total olive oil consumption. As the battle plays out between Quality Differentiation 3 New World quality and Old World price, New World olive oil processors and olive growers Intensive versus Traditional have a good, yet challenging, immediate opportunity to begin to build a sustainable Production in the New and premium niche segment in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ru N REPORT A
    Associated Food Dealers BULK RATE 18470 W. 10 Mile Rd. U.S. Postage Southfield, Ml 48075 PAID ASSOCIATED FOOD DEALERS OF MICHIGAN Permit No. 36 r u n Address Correction Requested Detroit, Ml * K and its affiliate: PACKAGE LIQUOR DEALERS ASSOCIATION FOOD & BEVERAGE REPORT A *0L 8. NO 10 An official publication of the Associated Food Dealers of Michigan OCTOBER 1997 and its affiliate, Package Liquor Dealers Association Electronic Deregulation and its on the independent ■ page 4 Dm '* IGA draws its customers fram the north side of the frawbridge - page 16 Distributors - «deoc> Ls big part of success A FD - 9 * 6 J SPECIAL EDITION Mtrt Rep. Bogardus - page }0 Legislative Update Even Santa has Michigan roots! by Michele MacWilliams that children from every nation learn as they Air quality This month we celebrate the great study geography. bounty of products and services that But this great mitten-of-a-state holds a our state provides. distinction that many of us are unaware of. standards Surrounded by Great Lakes, Michigan is the birthplace of our modern-day dotted with inland lakes and Santa Claus. The figure of Santa that we are alert ingrained with rich, fertile soil, all familiar with was created by Haddon In a grassroots “Call-to Michigan produces a plethora of Hubbard Sunblom, bom June 22, 1899 in Action" delivered to agricultural products. Ours is a Muskegon. Sunblom created Santa for a member companies last leading state in the production of Coca-Cola ad campaign in 1931 and thanks to apples, black beans, celery, week, GMA asked the continuity of Coca-Cola’s packaging, cranberries, mushrooms, navy beans, manufacturers and their Santa Claus comes to live for all of us, young blueberries, tart cherries, pickling employees to help put a and old.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:13-Cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 1 of 90
    Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 1 of 90 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 2 of 90 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 3 of 90 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 4 of 90 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 5 of 90 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 6 of 90 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 7 of 90 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 8 of 90 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 9 of 90 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 10 of 90 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 11 of 90 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 12 of 90 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 13 of 90 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 14 of 90 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 15 of 90 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 16 of 90 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 17 of 90 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 18 of 90 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 19 of 90 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 20 of 90 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 21 of 90 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 22 of 90 EXHIBIT 1 Case 1:13-cv-05944-UA Document 1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 23 of 90 INTERNATIONAL COI/T.15/NC No 3/Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Get Ready for the 2Nd Wave of Food Labeling Litigation Law360, New York (February 20, 2015, 11:34 AM ET)
    Portfolio Media. Inc. | 860 Broadway, 6th Floor | New York, NY 10003 | www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 | Fax: +1 646 783 7161 | [email protected] Get Ready For The 2nd Wave Of Food Labeling Litigation Law360, New York (February 20, 2015, 11:34 AM ET) -- The ongoing Filippo Berio olive oil litigation in the Northern District of California offers food companies a cautionary example, both for traditional labeling issues and for the trend toward litigation based on product testing. The plaintiff in Kumar v. Salov North America Corp., No. 4:14-CV-02411 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2015) alleges that Salov’s Filippo Berio oil is deceptively labeled as “Imported from Italy,” and that independent product tests on the “Extra Virgin” varieties show these to be of less-than extra-virgin quality. In response to Salov’s motion to dismiss, the court has narrowed the issues but is allowing the bulk of plaintiff’s claims to proceed. Salov produces and markets a variety of olive oils under its Filippo Berio brand. The front label of each bottle says “Imported from Italy,” while the back label informs consumers that the product is “Packed in Italy,” with component olive oils from Greece, Italy, Spain and Tunisia. In her complaint, Kumar alleges she purchased a bottle Ann P. Havelka of Filippo Berio Extra Virgin Olive Oil after assessing only the front label, believing she was buying oil made solely from Italian olives. Because this was not the case, and because she interprets implementing regulations for the Tariff Act of 1930 as requiring these other counties to be disclosed in close proximity to the word “Italy,” she sued.
    [Show full text]
  • “Extra Virgin”Olive Oil Often Fails International and USDA Standards
    DRAFT: TESTS INDICATE OLIVE OIL LABELED AS “EXTRA VIRGIN” OFTEN FAILS INTERNATIONAL AppendixAND U.S. STANDARDS Tests indicate that imported “extra virgin”olive oil often fails international and USDA standards Frankel, E. N.;©iStockphoto.com/Miranda Mailer, R. J.; McMurrayShoemaker, C. F.; Wang, S. C.; Flynn, J. D. ©iStockphoto.com/Miranda McMurray July 2010 OLIVE CENTER Robert Mondavi Institute for Wine and Food Science University of California, Davis Appendix: Tests indicate that imported “extra virgin”olive oil often fails international and U.S. standards CONTENTS IOC/USDA STANDARDS vs GRADES OF OLIVE OILS……………………………………. A2 SAMPLE COLLECTION INFORMATION……………………………………. A4 AUSTRALIAN OILS RESEARCH LABORATORY/UC DAVIS LABORATORY DATA TABLES ‐ AORL chemical analysis with sample information……………………………………. A5 ‐ AORL fatty acid profiles……………………………………. A6 ‐ AORL sterols……………………………………. A7 ‐ AORL TAGs profiles……………………………………. A8 ‐ UC Davis chemical analysis with sample information……………………………………. A9 ‐ UC Davis fatty acid profiles……………………………………. A11 ‐ AORL/UC Davis chemical analysis……………………………………. A12 AUSTRALIAN OILS RESEARCH LABORATORY ‐ by sample ……………………………………. A13 UC DAVIS LABORATORY ‐ by sample ……………………………………. A169 1 “Olive Oil” ( a blend of Grades v. Extra Virgin Olive Oil Virgin Olive Oil Refined Olive Oil virgin olive oil and IOC/USDA Limits refined olive oil) Free Fatty Acid IOC/USDA: ≤ 0.8 IOC/USDA: ≤ 2.0 IOC/USDA: ≤ 0.3 IOC/USDA: ≤ 1.0 (FFA) Units: % as oleic acid Peroxide Value IOC/USDA: ≤ 20 IOC/USDA: ≤ 20 IOC/USDA: ≤ 5 IOC/USDA: ≤
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court Northern District of California California Northern District of 19 Rodriguez, 431 U.S
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ROHINI KUMAR, individually and on behalf of Case No.: 14-CV-2411- YGR 11 the general public and those similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLASS 12 Plaintiff, CERTIFICATION 13 vs. DKT. NO. 85 14 SALOV NORTH AMERICA CORP., 15 16 Defendants. 17 United States District Court Plaintiff Rohini Kumar (“Kumar”) brings this Motion for Class Certification of a proposed Northern District of California California Northern District of 18 19 class of purchasers of olive oil based on alleged mislabeling as “Imported from Italy.” (Dkt No. 85.) 20 Defendant Salov North America Corporation (“Salov”) opposes the motion. Having carefully 21 considered the papers submitted, the pleadings in this action, the admissible evidence,1 and the 22 arguments of the parties, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the Motion for Class 23 Certification. 24 25 1 Salov filed objections to evidence submitted by Kumar with her reply. (Dkt. No. 110.) 26 Salov’s objection to Exhibit 28 of the Supplemental Simplicio Declaration is SUSTAINED as lacking foundation. Salov’s objections to portions of Weir’s supplemental declaration are OVERRULED. The 27 evidence is properly before the Court for purposes of the class certification analysis. However, Salov is free to bring a Daubert challenge, and to move for a further deposition of Weir on the 28 substance of any new opinions stated in the supplemental declaration. I. BACKGROUND 1 2 Kumar seeks to certify a class defined as: “All purchasers in California of liquid Filippo 3 Berio brand olive oil of any grade (including extra virgin, pure, or extra light), between May 23, 4 2010 and August 31, 2015.”2 Kumar alleges that the class was deceived by misleading labeling 5 stating that the products were “Imported from Italy” because the oil is actually produced in Tunisia, 6 Greece, and Spain, then shipped to Italy, mixed with a small amount of Italian olive oil, bottled, and 7 8 sold to consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Market Potential for Olive Oil 1. Product Description
    The European market potential for olive oil Last updated: 08 October 2020 In the long term, the European market for olive oil is expected to show stable growth of 3%–5% over the next five years. This growth is mostly driven by changes in the consumption patterns of European consumers, like the rising interest in healthier cooking and the Mediterranean diet. The best opportunities for developing country suppliers can be found in France, the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Belgium. Contents of this page 1. Product description 2. What makes Europe an interesting market for olive oil? 3. Which European countries offer most opportunities for olive oil exporters? 4. Which trends offer opportunities on the European olive oil market? 1. Product description Olive oil is a vegetable oil obtained from the fruit of the olive tree (Olea europaea). Olive oil can be produced by physical and mechanical means, or by chemical means. Most olive oils are produced by physical and mechanical means, through operations such as grinding, pressing, centrifugation and physical filtration. Olive oil can also be produced by chemical means, with the use of solvents, but those methods negatively affect quality. Depending on the production method, the composition and sensory characteristics of olive oil can be classified in several categories: Virgin olive oil – obtained solely by mechanical or other physical means. Virgin olive oils include several quality categories, such as extra virgin olive oil (with <0.8% free acidity), virgin olive oil (with 2%– 3.3% free acidity) and ordinary olive oil (with >3.3% free acidity).
    [Show full text]