A History of Comparative Advertising in the United States

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A History of Comparative Advertising in the United States JMO15310.1177/1522637913486092<italic>Journalism & Communication Monographs</italic>Beard 486092research-article2013 Monograph Journalism & Communication Monographs 15(3) 114 –216 A History of Comparative © 2013 AEJMC Reprints and permissions: Advertising in the sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1522637913486092 United States jcmo.sagepub.com Fred K. Beard1 Abstract This historical monograph addresses a gap in the extensive scholarly research literature devoted to comparative advertising—especially that which contrasts the advertised product, service, or brand with an identifiable competitor—by exploring advertisers’ explanations for its appeal as a tactic throughout the previous century. Prior historical research confirms advertisers have long been aware of and greatly concerned about the unintended consequences of what they often called excessively competitive and combative advertising. Moreover, despite some thirty-five years of systematic scholarly research, two research teams recently concluded that the state of empirical knowledge regarding its effectiveness remains “equivocal.” By synthesizing the extensive theoretical and empirical research literature on comparative advertising and interpreting those findings from a historical perspective, this monograph offers uniquely significant insights into modern advertising’s history, theory, and practice. Keywords comparative advertising, advertising history, advertising message strategy Comparative advertising—especially that which contrasts the advertised product or service with an identifiable competitor—has been a controversial topic among adver- tisers throughout the past one hundred years and remains so. Recent historical research suggests that such consequences as the tendency for advertisers to lose focus on their own message strategies, the creation of potentially misleading advertisements, legal challenges from competitors under the Lanham Trademark Act, and damage to adver- tising’s institutional veracity have often occurred when advertisers used comparative 1University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA Corresponding Author: Fred K. Beard, Gaylord College of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Oklahoma, 395 West Lindsey, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA. Email: [email protected] Downloaded from jmo.sagepub.com at UNIV OF OKLAHOMA on January 20, 2016 Beard 115 advertising, especially if they became engaged in advertising wars.1 Moreover, and despite some thirty-five years of systematic scholarly research, two independent research teams concluded not long ago that the state of empirical knowledge regarding its effectiveness remains “equivocal.”2 Industry concerns regarding comparative advertising and calls for its reform began to appear regularly during the Great Depression and peaked during one of the most contentious periods of advertising self-regulation, the 1970s. Comparative advertis- ing, in fact, set the stage for an extraordinary regulatory battle between the advertising industry and the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) during the mid- to late-1970s. Advertisers were aware of and concerned about the unintended consequences of what they sometimes called excessively competitive and combative advertising throughout the previous century.3 These consequences help explain why surveys of contemporary advertising professionals confirm that despite its frequent use, they continue to retain a healthy skepticism toward comparative advertising’s effectiveness.4 Problems with comparative advertising also attracted the attention of media owners and managers. By the early-1930s, they were in near-unanimous agreement that com- parative advertising represented a serious business and regulatory problem, trapping many between two or more feuding patrons, frequently forcing advertising refusals and revisions to clearance policies, and threatening advertising revenue.5 Although comparative advertising was widely criticized by advertisers during the first half of the twentieth century, research confirms they did engage in it, especially during the lean years of the Great Depression.6 Richard Pollay,7 who content analyzed 2,000 magazine ads published between 1900 and 1980, reported that the generalized mention of competitive standing, or what is called “implied” comparative advertis- ing,8 was quite common, with an average of 25% across the decades. However, when Pollay operationalized comparative advertising as ads that included “clues” to the identity of competitors, or what is called “explicit” comparative advertising,9 the aver- age was only 2%. Pollay found the greatest frequency of use, at 4%, in the 1970s. Other researchers also report that explicit comparative advertising increased sig- nificantly during and after the 1970s in both broadcast and print media. Estimates of comparative ads as a percentage of all ads in the United States range from about 7%10 to 23%11 to between 30% and 40%.12 Researchers Linda Swayne and Thomas Stevenson found the percentage of comparative ads in business magazines increased from 8.1% in 1970 to 23.8% in 1985,13 and Fahad Al-Olayan and Kiran Karande report that 26% of their sample of U.S. general interest, family, and women’s maga- zines included comparisons.14 Estimates of the use of comparative advertising on television are higher, on aver- age, ranging from 5% to 10%15 to 14%16 to 50%17 to as high as 80%.18 Industry reports of comparative advertising frequency based on television network analyses also indi- cate a steady increase, ranging from 23%19 to 35%20 to as high as 50%.21 The number of comparative commercials on prime time television, according to Gallup & Robinson, soared from one out of thirty during the 1973 season to one out of twelve in 1975.22 Although there has been no recent content analysis of comparative advertising use, some industry observers suggest an increase during the first decade of the twentieth century.23 Downloaded from jmo.sagepub.com at UNIV OF OKLAHOMA on January 20, 2016 116 Journalism & Communication Monographs 15(3) There are several theoretical explanations for why the kinds of negative informa- tion often found in comparative ads could enhance their effectiveness. For instance, “negativity bias”24 predicts that negative information may have a greater effect in the decision-making process, compared with positive information. Researchers investi- gating political attack advertising propose this occurs because negative information is more unexpected and novel,25 less ambiguous,26 and more credible.27 Some of these effects likely occur because negative information is often presented, as it generally is in comparative product and service advertising, within a context that is predominantly positive.28 On the other hand, others suggest negative information encourages greater attention and recall because it appeals to emotion rather than logic29 and because peo- ple assign greater weight to negative information when making evaluations in social settings.30 Advertising’s most important theory, the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM),31 also offers a valuable framework for understanding comparative advertising and its effectiveness. The ELM proposes two routes to persuasion—one central and one peripheral. The central route predicts that when people are motivated to think about a message (e.g., they are highly involved or the message is especially relevant) and able to think about it (e.g., the message is fairly easy to understand), then they will cogni- tively elaborate on the claims in the ad and be persuaded by issue-relevant arguments. Negativity bias suggests that comparative ads containing claims and criticisms about competitors, especially identified ones, likely activate the central route to per- suasion, encouraging people to integrate the claims into their existing knowledge structures, leading to message acceptance and possibly long-term attitude change. On the other hand, since some people may be expected to counterargue with comparative ads as well as derogate the source,32 these could encourage negative thoughts, leading to rejection of the message. Conversely, the “distraction hypothesis”33 predicts that after a comparative ad gains people’s attention, they might be distracted from counter- arguing with the comparative claims and criticisms by peripheral cues, such as humor, music, or celebrity spokespersons. The result would be a weaker, temporary form of attitude change by way of the ELM’s peripheral route to persuasion. Academic researchers have devoted considerable attention to comparative advertis- ing. More than eighty studies on the topic were published in scholarly journals between 1975 and 1994.34 Many of these were likely among the seventy-seven studies Dhruv Grewal and his colleagues included in their widely cited meta-analysis.35 A search of the literature published since 1997 uncovered another fifty studies of comparative advertising. A review and synthesis of the findings and conclusions from Grewal et al.’s meta- analysis, John Rogers and Terrell Williams’s practitioner survey and literature review (forty-two studies), Fred Beard’s 2011 update of the Rogers and Williams survey, and the fifty studies of comparative advertising published since 1997 is presented in Table 1’s model.36 The model’s process outcomes (cognitive, affective, and conative) were cho- sen from the literature based on three criteria: (1) They are the outcomes most fre- quently investigated, (2) they are of theoretical significance, and (3) they are important to advertisers. Downloaded from jmo.sagepub.com
Recommended publications
  • This Constitution: a Bicentennial Chronicle, Nos. 14-18
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 300 290 SO 019 380 AUTHOR Mann, Shelia, Ed. TITLE This Constitution: A Bicentennial Chronicle, Nos. 14-18. INSTITUTION American Historical Association, Washington, D.C.; American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.; Project '87, Washington, DC. SPONS AGENCY National Endowment for the Humanities (NFAH), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 87 NOTE 321p.; For related document, see ED 282 814. Some photographs may not reproduce clearly. AVAILABLE FROMProject '87, 1527 New Hampshire Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20036 nos. 13-17 $4.00 each, no. 18 $6.00). PUB TYPE Collected Works - Serials (022) -- Historical Materials (060) -- Guides - Classroom Use - Guides (For Teachers) (052) JOURNAL CIT This Constitution; n14-17 Spr Sum Win Fall 1987 n18 Spr-Sum 1988 EDRS PRICE MFO1 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS Class Activities; *Constitutional History; *Constitutional Law; History Instruction; Instructioral Materials; Lesson Plans; Primary Sources; Resource Materials; Secondary Education; Social Studies; United States Government (Course); *United States History IDENTIFIERS *Bicentennial; *United States Constitution ABSTRACT Each issue in this bicentennial series features articles on selected U.S. Constitution topics, along with a section on primary documents and lesson plans or class activities. Issue 14 features: (1) "The Political Economy of tne Constitution" (K. Dolbeare; L. Medcalf); (2) "ANew Historical Whooper': Creating the Art of the Constitutional Sesquicentennial" (K. Marling); (3) "The Founding Fathers and the Right to Bear Arms: To Keep the People Duly Armed" (R. Shalhope); and (4)"The Founding Fathers and the Right to Bear Arms: A Well-Regulated Militia" (L. Cress). Selected articles from issue 15 include: (1) "The Origins of the Constitution" (G.
    [Show full text]
  • Setting Goals and Objectives Setting Advertising Campaign Goals 1
    Department: Journalism and Mass Communication Course Name: M.A. JMC Semester - 4th Semester Paper name: Advanced Public Relations and Advertising Teacher Name: Prof. Manukonda Rabindranath Note: This is for the purpose of reading only but not for any publication. Unit-5 1. Advertising Campaigns: Setting goals and objectives Setting advertising campaign goals 1. Brand Awareness. It is common for marketers to appoint brand awareness as the most important goal in their marketing strategy. 2. Website Traffic. 3. Social Engagement. 4. Displaying Video Ads. 5. Understanding your target audience. Advertising has three primary objectives: to inform, to persuade, and to remind. Informative Advertising creates awareness of brands, products, services, and ideas. It announces new products and programs and can educate people about the attributes and benefits of new or established products. Within these broad goals, companies normally have more specific, quantified objectives, as well. Advertising campaigns are built to accomplish a particular objective or a set of objectives. Such objectives usually include establishing a brand, raising 1 brand awareness. The rate of success or failure in accomplishing these goals is reckoned via effectiveness measures. Following types of Advertising are most effective. • Social Media. With 56% of Americans having a profile with a social networking service, social media is undoubtedly a killer advertising platform to maximize brand recognition and spend as little money as possible. • Print Media. • Television. • Radio. • Direct Mail. • Email. Here's a breakdown of the top four most trusted advertising mediums, according to a recent study by Future Foundation for FEPE International. 1. TV. Twenty-eight percent of consumers believe television advertising is the most trustworthy, making it the most trusted advertising medium.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazil Ahead of the 2018 Elections
    BRIEFING Brazil ahead of the 2018 elections SUMMARY On 7 October 2018, about 147 million Brazilians will go to the polls to choose a new president, new governors and new members of the bicameral National Congress and state legislatures. If, as expected, none of the presidential candidates gains over 50 % of votes, a run-off between the two best-performing presidential candidates is scheduled to take place on 28 October 2018. Brazil's severe and protracted political, economic, social and public-security crisis has created a complex and polarised political climate that makes the election outcome highly unpredictable. Pollsters show that voters have lost faith in a discredited political elite and that only anti- establishment outsiders not embroiled in large-scale corruption scandals and entrenched clientelism would truly match voters' preferences. However, there is a huge gap between voters' strong demand for a radical political renewal based on new faces, and the dramatic shortage of political newcomers among the candidates. Voters' disillusionment with conventional politics and political institutions has fuelled nostalgic preferences and is likely to prompt part of the electorate to shift away from centrist candidates associated with policy continuity to candidates at the opposite sides of the party spectrum. Many less well-off voters would have welcomed a return to office of former left-wing President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (2003-2010), who due to a then booming economy, could run social programmes that lifted millions out of extreme poverty and who, barred by Brazil's judiciary from running in 2018, has tried to transfer his high popularity to his much less-known replacement.
    [Show full text]
  • Labor Scarcity, Finance, and Innovation: Evidence from Antebellum America∗
    Labor Scarcity, Finance, and Innovation: Evidence from Antebellum America∗ Yifei Mao Jessie Jiaxu Wang SC Johnson College of Business W. P. Carey School of Business Cornell University Arizona State University March 9, 2018 Abstract This paper establishes labor scarcity as an important economic channel through which access to finance shapes technological innovation. We exploit antebellum America, a unique setting with (1) staggered passage of free banking laws across states and (2) sharp differences in labor scarcity between slave and free states. We find that greater access to finance spurred technological innovation as measured by patenting activities, especially in free states where labor was relatively scarce. Inter- estingly, in slave states where slave labor was prevalent, access to finance encouraged technological innovation that substituted for free labor, but discouraged technologi- cal innovation that substituted for slave labor. Keywords: antebellum America, free banking laws, finance and innovation, labor scarcity ∗We thank conference participants at WAPFIN@Stern, and brownbag participants at Arizona State Uni- versity and Cornell University for helpful comments. Contact information, Mao: [email protected]; Wang: [email protected]. 1 Introduction While technological innovation is important for economic growth (Solow, 1957) and firms’ competitive advantage (Porter, 1992), it is difficult to achieve. Pioneered by Schumpeter, a large literature has established a well-functioning financial market as a driver of technological innovation (King and Levine, 1993; Brown, Fazzari, and Petersen, 2009; Hall, 2010; Hsu, Tian, and Xu, 2014; Kerr and Nanda, 2015). However, the role of finance is rarely examined in connection with the fundamental incentive of innovation|reducing production costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation and Deregulation After 25 Years: Lessons Learned for Research in Industrial Organization
    Regulation and Deregulation After 25 Years: Lessons Learned for Research in Industrial Organization PAUL L. JOSKOW Elizabeth and James Killian Professor of Economics, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. This paper is based on a keynote address given at the 2004 International Industrial Organization Conference in Chicago, April 2004. I draw selectively on the literature from the past 25 years on regulation/deregulation to provide important lessons about the attributes of good research in empirical industrial organization. I. Introduction When I first began doing research on issues related to government regulation of industry in the early 1970s, a significant slice of the economy was subject to some form of government price and/or entry regulation. The affected industries included (a) airlines, (b) trucking, (c) railroads, (d) electric power, (e) natural gas production, (f) pipeline transportation and distribution of natural gas, (g) crude oil and refined petroleum products, (h) cable television, (i) automobile insurance, (j) hospital services, and others. The share of these industries in GDP, while substantial, understates their potential impact on overall economic performance of the economy since they generally supplied important intermediate goods and services to downstream commercial and industrial users. Beginning about 25 years ago legislative and regulatory actions began a process of deregulation, vertical and horizontal industry restructuring and regulatory reform that has now affected, to varying degrees, all of these industries. Many of these industries have been completely transformed during this period of time (e.g. airlines, trucking, and telecommunications). Others are in the midst of more lengthy transitions that involve 2 restructuring and deregulation of major industry segments and the application of new regulatory mechanisms to those segments that continue to be regulated (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020
    Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Nic Newman with Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Simge Andı, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Supported by Surveyed by © Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2020 4 Contents Foreword by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen 5 3.15 Netherlands 76 Methodology 6 3.16 Norway 77 Authorship and Research Acknowledgements 7 3.17 Poland 78 3.18 Portugal 79 SECTION 1 3.19 Romania 80 Executive Summary and Key Findings by Nic Newman 9 3.20 Slovakia 81 3.21 Spain 82 SECTION 2 3.22 Sweden 83 Further Analysis and International Comparison 33 3.23 Switzerland 84 2.1 How and Why People are Paying for Online News 34 3.24 Turkey 85 2.2 The Resurgence and Importance of Email Newsletters 38 AMERICAS 2.3 How Do People Want the Media to Cover Politics? 42 3.25 United States 88 2.4 Global Turmoil in the Neighbourhood: 3.26 Argentina 89 Problems Mount for Regional and Local News 47 3.27 Brazil 90 2.5 How People Access News about Climate Change 52 3.28 Canada 91 3.29 Chile 92 SECTION 3 3.30 Mexico 93 Country and Market Data 59 ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE 3.31 Australia 96 3.01 United Kingdom 62 3.32 Hong Kong 97 3.02 Austria 63 3.33 Japan 98 3.03 Belgium 64 3.34 Malaysia 99 3.04 Bulgaria 65 3.35 Philippines 100 3.05 Croatia 66 3.36 Singapore 101 3.06 Czech Republic 67 3.37 South Korea 102 3.07 Denmark 68 3.38 Taiwan 103 3.08 Finland 69 AFRICA 3.09 France 70 3.39 Kenya 106 3.10 Germany 71 3.40 South Africa 107 3.11 Greece 72 3.12 Hungary 73 SECTION 4 3.13 Ireland 74 References and Selected Publications 109 3.14 Italy 75 4 / 5 Foreword Professor Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Director, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ) The coronavirus crisis is having a profound impact not just on Our main survey this year covered respondents in 40 markets, our health and our communities, but also on the news media.
    [Show full text]
  • Telemarketing Guide Contents
    Telemarketing guide Contents Acknowledgements 5 Introduction 6 Business practice Compliance 8 Regulation, compliance and standards 8 Regulatory enforcement 8 Industry standards 8 Verification 8 Verifiers 9 Quality assurance 10 Quality assurance tools 10 Corporate and social responsibility 12 Customer satisfaction 12 Complaints procedure 13 Complaints policy 13 Complaints process 14 Complaints reporting 14 Complaints analysis 15 Complaint-handling training 15 Customer behaviour 17 Inclusivity and vulnerable consumers 17 Human resources 19 Key principles 19 Roles 19 Recruitment 19 Contracts 20 Remuneration 21 Training 22 Supervision and support of agents 26 Ongoing competency 26 Note for agents 26 Supplier–client relationships 27 Responsibilities 27 2 Contents Campaign creation Campaign objectives 29 Questions to consider: 29 Campaign strategy 29 Key principles 29 Add value to your customer and brand 30 Conversion rates 30 Campaign planning 31 Brief your front-line staff 31 Call and after-call process 32 1. Disclosure 32 2. Structure 32 3. Summary 33 4. Post-call process 33 Data 34 Sourcing data 34 Handling data 35 Using data 38 Campaign delivery Call scheduling 41 Key considerations 41 Reasonable hours 41 Ring time 42 Call retrying 43 Retry handling 43 Nuisance calls 43 Call-backs 44 Call abandonment 45 Abandoned call handling 45 Abandoned call information message 45 Technology and testing 46 Dialler operations 46 Predictive dialling 47 Answer machine detection (AMD) 50 3 Contents Campaign response Results and ROI 53 Campaign monitoring
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Financial Deregulation in the United States  I
    A Short History of Financial Deregulation in the United States Matthew Sherman July 2009 Center for Economic and Policy Research 1611 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20009 202-293-5380 www.cepr.net CEPR A Short History of Financial Deregulation in the United States i Contents Timeline of Key Events....................................................................................................................................1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................................3 Background.........................................................................................................................................................3 Usury Laws .........................................................................................................................................................5 Removing Interest Rate Ceilings .....................................................................................................................6 Repealing Glass-Steagall....................................................................................................................................8 Hands-Off Regulation.....................................................................................................................................10 Inflating the Bubble.........................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Brand Credibility to Mitigate Brand Boycott Preventive Strategy of Brand Globalness and Brand Endorsement: Theoretical Perspective
    Journal of Economics, Business and Management, Vol. 3, No. 7, July 2015 Brand Credibility to Mitigate Brand Boycott Preventive Strategy of Brand Globalness and Brand Endorsement: Theoretical Perspective Hesham Fazel organizers that hindered product distribution [3], boycotts Abstract—Boycott effectiveness is highly reliant upon are undesirable perceptions for marketers and managers, consumer willingness to engage or disengage in the boycott who must therefore do everything in their power to develop activities. Little research investigates possible strategies that can be applied to positively influence individuals’ perspectives and implement all possible tactics that will prevent or about the boycotted brands and perhaps increase their reduce the loss in market-share that can result from such willingness to disengage in boycott activities. This paper social actions by consumers. theoretically discusses a main relationship between brand For the most part, prior research studies on consumer credibility and willingness to dis/engagement in brand boycott boycotts have been conceptual or descriptive, with a focus movements. I propose that when consumers perceive a brand at higher level of credibility, they are less inclined to engage in on boycott organizers and targets as well as consumer boycott activities against that brand. Furthermore, this paper motivations for participating in boycott activities [4]. No discusses the idea that brand endorsement of local events and previous studies have investigated beyond the common consumers’ perception of brand globalness may moderate the relationship between firms and boycotters’ participation relationship between brand credibility and consumer willingness to dis/engage in boycotts. motivation. Little research has investigated the strategies that brands may apply protect their firm’s image and Index Terms—Brand, boycott, globalness, endorsement.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Advertising in the United States and in France Charlotte J
    Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business Volume 25 Issue 2 Winter Winter 2005 Comparative Advertising in the United States and in France Charlotte J. Romano Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb Part of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Intellectual Property Commons, and the Marketing Law Commons Recommended Citation Charlotte J. Romano, Comparative Advertising in the United States and in France, 25 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 371 (2004-2005) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Comparative Advertising in the United States and in France Charlotte J. Romano* I. INTRODUCTION Comparative advertising has been widely used for over thirty years in the United States. By contrast, the use of this advertising format has traditionally been-and still is-very marginal in France. Thus, when a commercial comparing the composition of two brands of mashed potatoes was broadcast on French national television in February 2003, several TV viewers, believing this type of advertisement to be prohibited, notified the French authority responsible for controlling television information broadcasts.' A comparison of available comparative advertising statistics provides a relevant illustration of the contrast between the two countries. About 80% of all television advertisements, 2 and 30% to 40% of all advertisements, contained comparative claims in the United States in the early 1990's.3 Conversely, only twenty-six advertisements were considered to be a form of comparative advertising in France in 1992 and 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Report Celebrations, Competitions & Community
    2016 Annual Report Celebrations, Competitions & Community www.SpecialOlympicsGA.org Table of Mission Contents Special Olympics Georgia provides year-round sports training and athletic competition in a variety of Olympic-type sports for children and adults with intellectual disabilities, giving them continuing Letter from the Board opportunities to develop physical fitness, demonstrate courage, Chairman and CEO experience joy and participate in the sharing of gifts, skills and 3 friendships with their families, other Special Olympics athletes and the community. Sports Offered and State Competitions Special Olympics Georgia, a 501c3 nonprofit organization, is supported by donations 4 from individuals, events, community groups, corporations and foundations. Special Olympics Georgia does not charge athletes to participate. The state offices are located at 4000 Dekalb Technology Parkway, Building 400, Suite 400, Atlanta, GA Beyond Sports: Healthy 30340 and 1601 N. Ashley Street, Suite 88, Valdosta, GA 31602. 770-414-9390. Athletes & Unified Sports www.SpecialOlympicsGA.org. 5 Meet Our Athletes: Marcus & Elena 6 2016 Fundraising Highlights: Law Enforcement Torch Run & Special Events 7 2016 Financial Review 8 Meet Our Team 9-10 2016 Sponsors and Contributors Recognition “Let Me Win. But If I Cannot Win, 11-15 Let Me Be Brave In The Attempt.” Special Olympics Athlete Oath 2 A MESSAGE FROM OUR CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND CEO Dear Friends and Fans, In 1970, 500 Special Olympics Georgia (SOGA) athletes trained and participated in the first-ever competition held within our organization. 46 years later, we are in amazement at the continued growth of activity and support our organization has seen. 2016 was a year filled with celebrations of friendships and accomplishments, competitions that showcased bravery and sportsmanship, and newly formed relationships within communities across Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Advertising: Dollars and Decisions
    PAGE ONE Economics® Advertising: Dollars and Decisions Jeannette N. Bennett, Senior Economic Education Specialist GLOSSARY “Mass demand has been created almost entirely through the Advertising: Communication used by busi- development of advertising.” nesses to persuade consumers to buy a 1 good or service. —Calvin Coolidge, October 27, 1926 Choice: A decision made between two or more possibilities or alternatives. Consumers: People who buy goods and Introduction services to satisfy their wants. Having dollars in your pocket is one thing; keeping them there is another. Decisionmaking: Deciding among choices (alternatives or options). With so many businesses selling goods and services, there’s a lot of com- petition in the marketplace for the money in your pocket. In fact, consumers Demand: The quantity of a good or service 2 that buyers are willing and able to buy at are bombarded with as many as 4,000 to 10,000 advertisements each day! all possible prices during a certain time This advertising is designed to increase or create demand for products period. by influencing consumers’ choices about spending. Through persuasion, Market (marketplace): Buyers and sellers some dollars in your pocket are spent because of advertising. coming together to exchange goods, services, and/or resources. Advertising Benefits Price: The amount of money, determined by the interaction of buyers and sellers, that Advertising benefits both buyers and sellers. It provides information to a buyer must pay to acquire a good, ser- consumers about new products available and the advantages of buying vice, or resource. and using the advertised goods or services. It’s also a low-cost way for Profit: The amount of revenue that remains consumers to get information; they simply have to view the information after a business pays the costs of produc- when it is placed in front of them.
    [Show full text]