Hadley Wickham Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis Second Edition
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Introduction to IDL®
Introduction to IDL® Revised for Print March, 2016 ©2016 Exelis Visual Information Solutions, Inc., a subsidiary of Harris Corporation. All rights reserved. ENVI and IDL are registered trademarks of Harris Corporation. All other marks are the property of their respective owners. This document is not subject to the controls of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) or the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). Contents 1 Introduction To IDL 5 1.1 Introduction . .5 1.1.1 What is ENVI? . .5 1.1.2 ENVI + IDL, ENVI, and IDL . .6 1.1.3 ENVI Resources . .6 1.1.4 Contacting Harris Geospatial Solutions . .6 1.1.5 Tutorials . .6 1.1.6 Training . .7 1.1.7 ENVI Support . .7 1.1.8 Contacting Technical Support . .7 1.1.9 Website . .7 1.1.10 IDL Newsgroup . .7 2 About This Course 9 2.1 Manual Organization . .9 2.1.1 Programming Style . .9 2.2 The Course Files . 11 2.2.1 Installing the Course Files . 11 2.3 Starting IDL . 11 2.3.1 Windows . 11 2.3.2 Max OS X . 11 2.3.3 Linux . 12 3 A Tour of IDL 13 3.1 Overview . 13 3.2 Scalars and Arrays . 13 3.3 Reading Data from Files . 15 3.4 Line Plots . 15 3.5 Surface Plots . 17 3.6 Contour Plots . 18 3.7 Displaying Images . 19 3.8 Exercises . 21 3.9 References . 21 4 IDL Basics 23 4.1 IDL Directory Structure . 23 4.2 The IDL Workbench . 24 4.3 Exploring the IDL Workbench . -
A Comparative Evaluation of Matlab, Octave, R, and Julia on Maya 1 Introduction
A Comparative Evaluation of Matlab, Octave, R, and Julia on Maya Sai K. Popuri and Matthias K. Gobbert* Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Maryland, Baltimore County *Corresponding author: [email protected], www.umbc.edu/~gobbert Technical Report HPCF{2017{3, hpcf.umbc.edu > Publications Abstract Matlab is the most popular commercial package for numerical computations in mathematics, statistics, the sciences, engineering, and other fields. Octave is a freely available software used for numerical computing. R is a popular open source freely available software often used for statistical analysis and computing. Julia is a recent open source freely available high-level programming language with a sophisticated com- piler for high-performance numerical and statistical computing. They are all available to download on the Linux, Windows, and Mac OS X operating systems. We investigate whether the three freely available software are viable alternatives to Matlab for uses in research and teaching. We compare the results on part of the equipment of the cluster maya in the UMBC High Performance Computing Facility. The equipment has 72 nodes, each with two Intel E5-2650v2 Ivy Bridge (2.6 GHz, 20 MB cache) proces- sors with 8 cores per CPU, for a total of 16 cores per node. All nodes have 64 GB of main memory and are connected by a quad-data rate InfiniBand interconnect. The tests focused on usability lead us to conclude that Octave is the most compatible with Matlab, since it uses the same syntax and has the native capability of running m-files. R was hampered by somewhat different syntax or function names and some missing functions. -
Sage 9.4 Reference Manual: Finite Rings Release 9.4
Sage 9.4 Reference Manual: Finite Rings Release 9.4 The Sage Development Team Aug 24, 2021 CONTENTS 1 Finite Rings 1 1.1 Ring Z=nZ of integers modulo n ....................................1 1.2 Elements of Z=nZ ............................................ 15 2 Finite Fields 39 2.1 Finite Fields............................................... 39 2.2 Base Classes for Finite Fields...................................... 47 2.3 Base class for finite field elements.................................... 61 2.4 Homset for Finite Fields......................................... 69 2.5 Finite field morphisms.......................................... 71 3 Prime Fields 77 3.1 Finite Prime Fields............................................ 77 3.2 Finite field morphisms for prime fields................................. 79 4 Finite Fields Using Pari 81 4.1 Finite fields implemented via PARI’s FFELT type............................ 81 4.2 Finite field elements implemented via PARI’s FFELT type....................... 83 5 Finite Fields Using Givaro 89 5.1 Givaro Finite Field............................................ 89 5.2 Givaro Field Elements.......................................... 94 5.3 Finite field morphisms using Givaro................................... 102 6 Finite Fields of Characteristic 2 Using NTL 105 6.1 Finite Fields of Characteristic 2..................................... 105 6.2 Finite Fields of characteristic 2...................................... 107 7 Miscellaneous 113 7.1 Finite residue fields........................................... -
A Fast Dynamic Language for Technical Computing
Julia A Fast Dynamic Language for Technical Computing Created by: Jeff Bezanson, Stefan Karpinski, Viral B. Shah & Alan Edelman A Fractured Community Technical work gets done in many different languages ‣ C, C++, R, Matlab, Python, Java, Perl, Fortran, ... Different optimal choices for different tasks ‣ statistics ➞ R ‣ linear algebra ➞ Matlab ‣ string processing ➞ Perl ‣ general programming ➞ Python, Java ‣ performance, control ➞ C, C++, Fortran Larger projects commonly use a mixture of 2, 3, 4, ... One Language We are not trying to replace any of these ‣ C, C++, R, Matlab, Python, Java, Perl, Fortran, ... What we are trying to do: ‣ allow developing complete technical projects in a single language without sacrificing productivity or performance This does not mean not using components in other languages! ‣ Julia uses C, C++ and Fortran libraries extensively “Because We Are Greedy.” “We want a language that’s open source, with a liberal license. We want the speed of C with the dynamism of Ruby. We want a language that’s homoiconic, with true macros like Lisp, but with obvious, familiar mathematical notation like Matlab. We want something as usable for general programming as Python, as easy for statistics as R, as natural for string processing as Perl, as powerful for linear algebra as Matlab, as good at gluing programs together as the shell. Something that is dirt simple to learn, yet keeps the most serious hackers happy.” Collapsing Dichotomies Many of these are just a matter of design and focus ‣ stats vs. linear algebra vs. strings vs. -
Navigating the R Package Universe by Julia Silge, John C
CONTRIBUTED RESEARCH ARTICLES 558 Navigating the R Package Universe by Julia Silge, John C. Nash, and Spencer Graves Abstract Today, the enormous number of contributed packages available to R users outstrips any given user’s ability to understand how these packages work, their relative merits, or how they are related to each other. We organized a plenary session at useR!2017 in Brussels for the R community to think through these issues and ways forward. This session considered three key points of discussion. Users can navigate the universe of R packages with (1) capabilities for directly searching for R packages, (2) guidance for which packages to use, e.g., from CRAN Task Views and other sources, and (3) access to common interfaces for alternative approaches to essentially the same problem. Introduction As of our writing, there are over 13,000 packages on CRAN. R users must approach this abundance of packages with effective strategies to find what they need and choose which packages to invest time in learning how to use. At useR!2017 in Brussels, we organized a plenary session on this issue, with three themes: search, guidance, and unification. Here, we summarize these important themes, the discussion in our community both at useR!2017 and in the intervening months, and where we can go from here. Users need options to search R packages, perhaps the content of DESCRIPTION files, documenta- tion files, or other components of R packages. One author (SG) has worked on the issue of searching for R functions from within R itself in the sos package (Graves et al., 2017). -
The R and Omegahat Projects in Statistical Computing
The R and Omegahat Projects in Statistical Computing Brian D. Ripley [email protected] http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/∼ripley Outline • Statistical Computing – History – S – R • Application and Comparisons – Web servers – Embedding — Medieval Chant – R vs S-PLUS • Omegahat and Component Systems – The Omegahat project – Components — GGobi – The future? Statistical Computing and S Scene-setting: Statistical Computing 1980 Mainly Fortran programming, or PL/I (SAS). Batch computing (SAS, BMDP, SPSS, Genstat) with restricted range of platforms. Some small interactive systems (GLIM 3.77, Minitab). Very poor interactive graphics (2400 baud to a Tektronix storage tube if you were lucky). Flatbed and drum plotters, microfilm for publication-quality output off-line. Mainly home-brew solutions in research. (GLIM macros?) 1990 PCs become widespread, but FPUs still uncommon. Sun etc workstations available for researchers, and for teaching in a few places. Graphics could be pretty good (postscript printers, ca 1000 × 1000 pixel screens), but often was not, and mono text terminals were still widespread. C was beginning to be used, as more portable than Fortran. (Few PC Fortran compilers then and now.) Still SAS, SPSS etc as batch programs. S beginning to be make an impact on research and teaching. 2001 Little spread in machine speed (min 500MHz, max 1.5GHz), fast FPUs are universal. Colour everywhere, usually 24-bit colour. The video-games generation is now at university. Few people would dream of writing a complete program for a research idea: prototype and distribute in a higher-level language such as S or Matlab or Gauss or Ox or ... -
Supplementary Materials
Tomic et al, SIMON, an automated machine learning system reveals immune signatures of influenza vaccine responses 1 Supplementary Materials: 2 3 Figure S1. Staining profiles and gating scheme of immune cell subsets analyzed using mass 4 cytometry. Representative gating strategy for phenotype analysis of different blood- 5 derived immune cell subsets analyzed using mass cytometry in the sample from one donor 6 acquired before vaccination. In total PBMC from healthy 187 donors were analyzed using 7 same gating scheme. Text above plots indicates parent population, while arrows show 8 gating strategy defining major immune cell subsets (CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, B cells, 9 NK cells, Tregs, NKT cells, etc.). 10 2 11 12 Figure S2. Distribution of high and low responders included in the initial dataset. Distribution 13 of individuals in groups of high (red, n=64) and low (grey, n=123) responders regarding the 14 (A) CMV status, gender and study year. (B) Age distribution between high and low 15 responders. Age is indicated in years. 16 3 17 18 Figure S3. Assays performed across different clinical studies and study years. Data from 5 19 different clinical studies (Study 15, 17, 18, 21 and 29) were included in the analysis. Flow 20 cytometry was performed only in year 2009, in other years phenotype of immune cells was 21 determined by mass cytometry. Luminex (either 51/63-plex) was performed from 2008 to 22 2014. Finally, signaling capacity of immune cells was analyzed by phosphorylation 23 cytometry (PhosphoFlow) on mass cytometer in 2013 and flow cytometer in all other years. -
Downloaded from Ensembl V41 (6), All
IN SILICO APPROACHES TO INVESTIGATING MECHANISMS OF GENE REGULATION by SHANNAN JANELLE HO SUI B.Sc., The University of British Columbia, 2000 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Genetics) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) March 2008 © Shannan Janelle Ho Sui, 2008 Abstract Identification and characterization of regions influencing the precise spatial and temporal expression of genes is critical to our understanding of gene regulatory networks. Connecting transcription factors to the cis-regulatory elements that they bind and regulate remains a challenging problem in computational biology. The rapid accumulation of whole genome sequences and genome-wide expression data, and advances in alignment algorithms and motif-finding methods, provide opportunities to tackle the important task of dissecting how genes are regulated. Genes exhibiting similar expression profiles are often regulated by common transcription factors. We developed a method for identifying statistically over- represented regulatory motifs in the promoters of co-expressed genes using weight matrix models representing the specificity of known factors. Application of our methods to yeast fermenting in grape must revealed elements that play important roles in utilizing carbon sources. Extension of the method to metazoan genomes via incorporation of comparative sequence analysis facilitated identification of functionally relevant binding sites for sets of tissue-specific genes, and for genes showing similar expression in large-scale expression profiling studies. Further extensions address alternative promoters for human genes and coordinated binding of multiple transcription factors to cis-regulatory modules. Sequence conservation reveals segments of genes of potential interest, but the degree of sequence divergence among human genes and their orthologous sequences varies widely. -
Introduction to Ggplot2
Introduction to ggplot2 Dawn Koffman Office of Population Research Princeton University January 2014 1 Part 1: Concepts and Terminology 2 R Package: ggplot2 Used to produce statistical graphics, author = Hadley Wickham "attempt to take the good things about base and lattice graphics and improve on them with a strong, underlying model " based on The Grammar of Graphics by Leland Wilkinson, 2005 "... describes the meaning of what we do when we construct statistical graphics ... More than a taxonomy ... Computational system based on the underlying mathematics of representing statistical functions of data." - does not limit developer to a set of pre-specified graphics adds some concepts to grammar which allow it to work well with R 3 qplot() ggplot2 provides two ways to produce plot objects: qplot() # quick plot – not covered in this workshop uses some concepts of The Grammar of Graphics, but doesn’t provide full capability and designed to be very similar to plot() and simple to use may make it easy to produce basic graphs but may delay understanding philosophy of ggplot2 ggplot() # grammar of graphics plot – focus of this workshop provides fuller implementation of The Grammar of Graphics may have steeper learning curve but allows much more flexibility when building graphs 4 Grammar Defines Components of Graphics data: in ggplot2, data must be stored as an R data frame coordinate system: describes 2-D space that data is projected onto - for example, Cartesian coordinates, polar coordinates, map projections, ... geoms: describe type of geometric objects that represent data - for example, points, lines, polygons, ... aesthetics: describe visual characteristics that represent data - for example, position, size, color, shape, transparency, fill scales: for each aesthetic, describe how visual characteristic is converted to display values - for example, log scales, color scales, size scales, shape scales, .. -
Sharing and Organizing Research Products As R Packages Matti Vuorre1 & Matthew J
Sharing and organizing research products as R packages Matti Vuorre1 & Matthew J. C. Crump2 1 Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, United Kingdom 2 Department of Psychology, Brooklyn College of CUNY, New York USA A consensus on the importance of open data and reproducible code is emerging. How should data and code be shared to maximize the key desiderata of reproducibility, permanence, and accessibility? Research assets should be stored persistently in formats that are not software restrictive, and documented so that others can reproduce and extend the required computations. The sharing method should be easy to adopt by already busy researchers. We suggest the R package standard as a solution for creating, curating, and communicating research assets. The R package standard, with extensions discussed herein, provides a format for assets and metadata that satisfies the above desiderata, facilitates reproducibility, open access, and sharing of materials through online platforms like GitHub and Open Science Framework. We discuss a stack of R resources that help users create reproducible collections of research assets, from experiments to manuscripts, in the RStudio interface. We created an R package, vertical, to help researchers incorporate these tools into their workflows, and discuss its functionality at length in an online supplement. Together, these tools may increase the reproducibility and openness of psychological science. Keywords: reproducibility; research methods; R; open data; open science Word count: 5155 Introduction package standard, with additional R authoring tools, provides a robust framework for organizing and sharing reproducible Research projects produce experiments, data, analyses, research products. manuscripts, posters, slides, stimuli and materials, computa- Some advances in data-sharing standards have emerged: It tional models, and more. -
The Split-Apply-Combine Strategy for Data Analysis
JSS Journal of Statistical Software April 2011, Volume 40, Issue 1. http://www.jstatsoft.org/ The Split-Apply-Combine Strategy for Data Analysis Hadley Wickham Rice University Abstract Many data analysis problems involve the application of a split-apply-combine strategy, where you break up a big problem into manageable pieces, operate on each piece inde- pendently and then put all the pieces back together. This insight gives rise to a new R package that allows you to smoothly apply this strategy, without having to worry about the type of structure in which your data is stored. The paper includes two case studies showing how these insights make it easier to work with batting records for veteran baseball players and a large 3d array of spatio-temporal ozone measurements. Keywords: R, apply, split, data analysis. 1. Introduction What do we do when we analyze data? What are common actions and what are common mistakes? Given the importance of this activity in statistics, there is remarkably little research on how data analysis happens. This paper attempts to remedy a very small part of that lack by describing one common data analysis pattern: Split-apply-combine. You see the split-apply- combine strategy whenever you break up a big problem into manageable pieces, operate on each piece independently and then put all the pieces back together. This crops up in all stages of an analysis: During data preparation, when performing group-wise ranking, standardization, or nor- malization, or in general when creating new variables that are most easily calculated on a per-group basis. -
Hadley Wickham, the Man Who Revolutionized R Hadley Wickham, the Man Who Revolutionized R · 51,321 Views · More Stats
12/15/2017 Hadley Wickham, the Man Who Revolutionized R Hadley Wickham, the Man Who Revolutionized R · 51,321 views · More stats Share https://priceonomics.com/hadley-wickham-the-man-who-revolutionized-r/ 1/10 12/15/2017 Hadley Wickham, the Man Who Revolutionized R “Fundamentally learning about the world through data is really, really cool.” ~ Hadley Wickham, prolific R developer *** If you don’t spend much of your time coding in the open-source statistical programming language R, his name is likely not familiar to you -- but the statistician Hadley Wickham is, in his own words, “nerd famous.” The kind of famous where people at statistics conferences line up for selfies, ask him for autographs, and are generally in awe of him. “It’s utterly utterly bizarre,” he admits. “To be famous for writing R programs? It’s just crazy.” Wickham earned his renown as the preeminent developer of packages for R, a programming language developed for data analysis. Packages are programming tools that simplify the code necessary to complete common tasks such as aggregating and plotting data. He has helped millions of people become more efficient at their jobs -- something for which they are often grateful, and sometimes rapturous. The packages he has developed are used by tech behemoths like Google, Facebook and Twitter, journalism heavyweights like the New York Times and FiveThirtyEight, and government agencies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Truly, he is a giant among data nerds. *** Born in Hamilton, New Zealand, statistics is the Wickham family business: His father, Brian Wickham, did his PhD in the statistics heavy discipline of Animal Breeding at Cornell University and his sister has a PhD in Statistics from UC Berkeley.