DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of Defense FY 2009 Global

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of Defense FY 2009 Global COMPTROLLER This summary justification provides the Congress and the American people details on the President’s request of $66.0 billion of FY 2009 bridge funding for the Department of Defense to continue the global war on terror. This request is designed to support the Department of Defense’s efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan well into the next fiscal year. Additional funding is required to fully support the troops next year and a further request will be made later. This request funds troop levels 15 brigade combat teams (BCTs) in Iraq; and 4 BCTs in Afghanistan. The 4 BCTs in Afghanistan reflect 2 Army BCTs and 2 BCT equivalent teams training the Afghan National Security Forces. Emergency funding for over 15,000 mine resistant, ambush protected vehicles is largely completed and many are deployed to the theater. This request includes funding to keep these vehicles properly supported in the field. This request also includes expanded funding for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) for intelligence, reconnaissance and surveillance efforts. This will maximize U.S. industrial capacity. These additional UAVs will help save U.S. lives through closer surveillance of convoys, continue offensive actions against insurgents, and reduce the effectiveness of the enemy’s improvised explosive devices against our troops. Swift action on this request will ensure that our troops in harms way continue to receive the support, supplies, ammunition, and technology they need to be successful in their mission. Tina W. Jonas Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) FY 2009 Global War on Terror Bridge Supplemental TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW - FY 2009 GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR (GWOT) REQUEST............................................................................. 1 JUSTIFICATION BY CATEGORY................................................................................................................................... 6 OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 FORCE PROTECTION ............................................................................................................................................... 10 IED DEFEAT............................................................................................................................................................. 12 MILITARY INTELLIGENCE ......................................................................................................................................... 13 ADDITIONAL COMBATANT COMMANDER UAV AND ISR NEEDS ................................................................................... 14 IRAQ SECURITY FORCES ......................................................................................................................................... 15 AFGHAN NATIONAL SECURITY FORCES.................................................................................................................... 16 COALITION SUPPORT .............................................................................................................................................. 17 COMMANDER’S EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM ................................................................................................ 19 RECONSTITUTION ................................................................................................................................................... 20 WOUNDED, ILL AND INJURED ................................................................................................................................... 21 FUEL ADJUSTMENT ................................................................................................................................................. 22 NON-DOD CLASSIFIED ............................................................................................................................................. 22 ALLOCATION OF FY 2009 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR (GWOT) REQUEST ........................... 23 APPROPRIATION LANGUAGE.................................................................................................................................... 23 MILITARY PERSONNEL........................................................................................................................................ 23 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ......................................................................................................................... 24 PROCUREMENT.................................................................................................................................................. 29 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION........................................................................................... 31 REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS .............................................................................................................. 31 TITLE VIII - GENERAL PROVISIONS....................................................................................................................... 32 10000338 TABLE OF CONTENTS i FY 2009 Global War on Terror Bridge Supplemental OVERVIEW - FY 2009 GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR FY 2009 GWOT Request by Category (GWOT) REQUEST Over half of the $66.0B Request funds daily operations in Iraq and Afghanistan The Department of Defense requests $66.0 billion in fiscal year Functional Category (FY) 2009 bridge funding to continue operations in the Global FY09 War on Terror. This is a partial request, reflecting largely ($ in billions) operational costs, and does not fund the full cost to repair or Operations 33.6 replace equipment that has been worn out or damaged in Force Protection (including MRAP sustainment) 3.6 combat operations. IED Defeat 3.0 Military Intelligence 1.8 U.S. ENGAGEMENT IN IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN Additional COCOM UAV and ISR Needs 0.9 The goal of U.S. engagement in Iraq and Afghanistan is to Iraq Security Forces 2.0 establish stable, democratic and secure nations, with the Afghan National Security Forces 3.7 institutions and resources needed for each nation to provide for Coalition Support 0.6 its own security. Commander’s Emergency Response Program 1.7 IRAQ Reconstitution 9.5 Wounded, Ill, and Injured Programs 0.6 The strategic goal of the United States and its Coalition partners Fuel Adjustment 2.2 in Iraq remains a unified, democratic, and federal Iraq that can govern, defend, and sustain itself and that is an ally in the Global Non-DoD Classified 3.0 War on Terror. Stability in Iraq requires coordinated efforts in Total Request 66.0 Source: FY 2009 GWOT Request Amendment Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding political and economic development, as well as the development of more capable security forces. Ultimately, success in these • June 2004: A free Iraqi becomes head of state of a sovereign efforts lies with the government and people of Iraq. nation as the Coalition Provisional Authority closes down. Progress to Date • January 2005: Iraqis elect a Transitional National Assembly Success in Iraq is an essential element to counter the extremist in the first free election in 50 years. ideology that breeds international terrorism. • October 2005: Iraqis ratify a new permanent Constitution. Since March 2003, Iraq has made significant progress in • December 2005: Iraqis elect the Council of Representatives overcoming the brutal dictatorship of Saddam Hussein, in (CoR), which in turn forms the first government under the reviving Iraqi society, and in establishing democratic rule. Iraq permanent constitution. has achieved major milestones: • July 2006: Iraqis assume responsibility from Multi-National • March 2004: The Iraqi Governing Council approves the Force-Iraq (MNF-I) for the security of Muthanna Province, Transitional Administrative Law (interim constitution). the first to be transferred to Provincial Iraqi Control (PIC). 10000338 OVERVIEW 1 FY 2009 Global War on Terror Bridge Supplemental • September 2006: The Government of Iraq (GoI) establishes reconciliation among ethno-sectarian groups, and the Provincial the military Joint Headquarters and the Ground Forces Powers Law is a first step toward provincial elections, in addition Command, which assumes command and control of a to outlining the authorities inherent in the provincial versus portion of its armed forces. central governing institutions. • December 2007: The CoR passes the Unified Retirement Economic Achievements Law (Pension Law). Iraq’s economy is overcoming impediments to growth and is • January 2008: The CoR passes the Accountability and Justice projected to grow 7% in 2008, resulting in an estimated nominal Law. The Executive Council is formalized—consisting of the gross domestic product (GDP) of $60.9 billion. Core inflation for Prime Minister, the President, and two Vice Presidents. 2007 was 12.3% compared to core inflation of 31.9% in 2006. These macroeconomic improvements are largely due to • February 2008: The CoR passes the 2008 Budget, the improved monetary policy, government spending of oil revenue, Amnesty Law, and the Provincial Powers Law. and improved security. The GoI’s ability to use its own resources to provide essential services and promote economic Military Achievements development is progressing. This progress is further As of January 2008, 516,000 Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) were underscored by macroeconomic improvements that have assigned, including the Army, Air Force, Navy, local and occurred, in part,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Defense Logistical Support Contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan: Issues for Congress
    Defense Logistical Support Contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan: Issues for Congress Valerie Bailey Grasso Specialist in Defense Acquisition September 20, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33834 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Defense Logistical Support Contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan: Issues for Congress Summary This report examines Department of Defense (DOD) logistical support contracts for troop support services in Iraq and Afghanistan administered through the U.S. Army’s Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP), as well as legislative initiatives which may impact the oversight and management of logistical support contracts. LOGCAP is an initiative designed to manage the use of civilian contractors that perform services during times of war and other military mobilization. The first LOGCAP was awarded in 1992. Four LOGCAP contracts have been awarded for combat support services in Iraq and Afghanistan. The current LOGCAP III contractor supports the drawdown in Iraq by providing logistical services, theater transportation, augmentation of maintenance services, and other combat support services. On April 18, 2008, DOD announced the Army’s LOGCAP IV contract awards to three companies—DynCorp International LLC, Fort Worth, TX; Fluor Intercontinental, Inc, Greenville, SC; and KBR, Houston, TX, through a full and open competition. The LOGCAP IV contract calls for each company to compete for task orders. Each company may be awarded up to $5 billion annually for troop support services with a maximum annual value of $15 billion. As of March 2010, each company has been awarded at least one task order under LOGCAP IV. Over the life of LOGCAP IV, the maximum contract value is $150 billion.
    [Show full text]
  • Record Version Statement by Mr. Lee Thompson Executive
    RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY MR. LEE THOMPSON EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, LOGCAP US ARMY SUSTAINMENT COMMAND UNITED STATES ARMY BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON WARTIME CONTRACTING IN IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN “COUNTING CONTRACTORS: WHERE ARE THEY AND WHAT ARE THEY DOING” NOVEMBER 02, 2009 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE COMMISSION ON WARTIME CONTRACTING STATEMENT BY MR. LEE THOMPSON EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, LOGCAP US ARMY SUSTAINMENT COMMAND UNITED STATES ARMY Thank you for the opportunity to provide the Commission on Wartime Contracting with an update on the status of the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program – better known as LOGCAP - and on the continuing transition from the LOGCAP III (LCIII) contract, which relies on one company, to the LOGCAP IV (LCIV) contract, which uses three different companies. Both of these contingency contracts enable the Army to provide critical support to deployed troops serving on the front lines in Iraq and Afghanistan. As the executive director for the LOGCAP program, I am responsible for seeing that the operational force receives all the services we have contracted for under LOGCAP. This highly complex and challenging mission is accomplished by a team made up of the forward – deployed and rear echelon DA civilian employees, Army reserve officers, and Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the LOGCAP support unit; the Officers, NCOs, and civilian employees of the Defense Contract Management Agency, or DCMA; and the support contractors from DynCorp, Fluor and Kellogg-Brown-Root (KBR) who are assigned to the program by their companies. These hard-working, highly skilled people make up team LOGCAP forward, and are further supported by the men and women serving here in the United States for the US Army Materiel Command – or AMC – and its subordinate commands, the US Army Contracting Command and the US Army Sustainment Command – ACC and ASC.
    [Show full text]
  • Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA)
    Defense Contract Management Agency Contingency Operation(s): Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide Budget Activity - 04 Activity Group - Administrative and Service-Wide Activities I. Description of Operations Financed: The DCMA maintains a presence in theater to support the Army’s Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP) and Air Force Contract Augmentation Program (AFCAP). The LOGCAP provides life and logistics support to more than 165,000 Soldiers and civilians under difficult security circumstances in Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait, and Djibouti. The AFCAP provides air traffic management at air bases throughout central Asia, supplementing scarce Air Force assets and providing needed rest for Air Force service members who also perform this function. The DoD has already ordered over 17,000 Marines and Soldiers to deploy to Afghanistan by 31 December 2009; effectively doubling the number of combat brigades in the nation. This number of troops is expected to grow to 25,000 as the DoD commits the requisite resources to combat an “increasingly bold” Taliban in its Global War on Terrorism. As such, the personnel support and logistics infrastructure is growing rapidly to support this surge in troops. This coalition force support is provided through the military services’ Civil Augmentation Programs (CAPS) in which DCMA provides the requisite contract management and oversight; including Contract Administration, Property Management and Quality Assurance services. In support of the Afghanistan expansion mission DCMA increased its manning requirements and created a separate Contract Management Office. DCMA doubled its manning requirement from 46 to 99 personnel to include an O-6 Commander. Also in support of the LOGCAP III – IV transition DCMA will provide 9-12 additional personnel to assist in the transition process.
    [Show full text]
  • America's War on Terror
    AMERICA’S WAR ON TERROR: ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY AND POLICY OUTCOMES A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of The School of Continuing Studies And of The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Liberal Studies By Livia Drumheller Phillips, B.A. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY Washington, D.C. November 1, 2013 AMERICA’S WAR ON TERROR: ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY AND POLICY OUTCOMES Livia Drumheller Phillips Mentor: R. Nicholas Palarino, Ph.D. ABSTRACT The terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 in New York City, Washington D.C. and Pennsylvania altered the United State’s counter terrorism strategy. After having debated terrorism policy with little resolution following the first attack on the World Trade Center in 1983, the Government reacted aggressively to the September 11, 2001 attacks. The U.S. intelligence and military forces launched a worldwide offensive against al Qa’ida using all of the tools at their disposal. Including, private sector companies established to provide security support, staff augmentation and strategic planning. Since September 11, 2001 (9/11) private firms have remained essential to the mission and have been given high level access to Government personnel and information. The counter terrorism efforts have created an industry of defense contractors who are increasingly replacing civil servants in various positions, including analysts, administrators, and security forces. Similar to the U.S., Israel and Great Britain have long histories combating terrorist activities. Israel is surrounded by enemies while Great Britain has a terrorist threat based in Ireland that traces its roots back over hundreds of years.
    [Show full text]
  • Audit of Coalition Partner Reimbursement of Dining Facility Services at Resolute Support Headquarters, Kabul, Afghanistan
    Report No. DODIG-2020-096 U.S. Department of Defense InspectorJUNE 24, 2020 General Audit of Coalition Partner Reimbursement of Dining Facility Services at Resolute Support Headquarters, Kabul, Afghanistan INTEGRITY INDEPENDENCE EXCELLENCE Audit of Coalition Partner Reimbursement of Dining Facility ResultsServices at Resolute in Brief Support Headquarters, Kabul, Afghanistan June 24, 2020 Background (cont’d) Objective Multinational Logistics (MNL), U.S. Army Central (ARCENT), and Coalition partner senior national representatives. There The objective of this audit was to determine are 17 Coalition partners who reimburse the DoD for the whether the DoD sought full reimbursement logistics support, supplies, and services they receive, also from Coalition partners at Resolute Support referred to as Pay-to-Play Coalition partners. Headquarters (RSHQ), Kabul, Afghanistan, for dining facility services provided The dining facility service transaction process begins when under the Logistics Civil Augmentation the Coalition partner senior national representative and Program (LOGCAP) contract. the ACSA coordinator agree to the terms of the ACSA order Background request. The ACSA coordinator creates an ACSA order form in the ACSA Global Automated Tracking and Reporting System (AGATRS), the system of record for managing ACSA LOGCAP is an Army program that uses transactions. The ACSA order form includes the dates of the contractors to provide elements of logistics dining service, per unit cost of dining facility services, and support, supplies, and services, such number of personnel who used the services. The Coalition as dining facilities, to deployed forces, partner senior national representative and the ACSA including Coalition partners. The DoD coordinator sign the ACSA order form, agreeing to the terms provides logistics support, supplies, of the order form, which constitutes a binding international and services to Coalition partners on a commitment.
    [Show full text]
  • Trafficking and Forced Labor
    JU NE 2012 VICTIMS OF COMPLACENCY: The Ongoing Trafficking and Abuse of Third Country Nationals Victims of Complacency by U.S. Government Contractors VICTIMS OF COMPLACENCY The Ongoing Trafficking and Abuse of Third Country Nationals by U.S. Government Contractors VICTIMS OF COMPLACENCY: The Ongoing Trafficking and Abuse of Third Country Nationals by U.S. Government Contractors JUNE 2012 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 www.aclu.org Cover images: LEFT: AP Photo/Lauren Frayer RIGHT: REUTERS/Damir Sagolj Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................. 5 Methodology .............................................................................................. 11 Acknowledgements ................................................................................... 12 Introduction ............................................................................................... 15 Section 1: Findings ................................................................................... 19 Who are TCNs? .............................................................................................. 19 The Recruiting Process ................................................................................. 21 Loan Sharks and Exploitative Lending ......................................................... 23 Transit to and Arrival in Iraq and Afghanistan .............................................. 23 Wages, Promotions, Contracts, and Passports
    [Show full text]
  • Overreliance: Logistics Contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan the U.S. Army
    Overreliance: Logistics Contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan The U.S. Army has used logistics contractors during military operations extensively since the first conflicts during the colonial era. This tradition continues in contemporary times, which tend to be marked by an overreliance by the armed forces on civilian contractors. The resulting lack of balance has had a rather mixed impact on current combat operations. To illustrate the point I will focus primarily on the case of logistics contractors, also known as combat service support contractors. I shall evaluate the Army’s use of the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP) contracts during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom (OIF/OEF). Next, I will address the question whether the Army should retain the core capabilities that were provided by LOGCAP during OIF and OEF. Further, I shall underscore the fact that logistics contractors are a vital component of the total Army force structure and a valued part of the Department of Defense’s balanced approach to providing logistics services. And, in a time of decreasing force structure in the Army and budget constraints, LOGCAP will remain an important part of the Army, the Joint services, and other governmental agencies for the foreseeable future. Last but not least, I shall propose remedies to balance the contractor component of the total Army force. Since ancient times, camp followers have played an integral role in supporting armies on the march by providing them with food and additional manpower. These crowds of men, women, and children consisted of the wives and families of soldiers, as well as merchants, tradesmen, slaves, servants, and prostitutes, all following the army and functioning within its framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Management and Performance in the Balkans Support Contract
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Arroyo Center View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Risk Management and Performance in the Balkans Support Contract Victoria A. Greenfield, Frank Camm Prepared for the United States Army Approved for public release; distribution unlimited The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Army under Contract No. DASW01-01-C-0003.
    [Show full text]
  • NSIAD-97-63 Contingency Operations B-272659
    United States General Accounting Office GAO Report to Congressional Requesters February 1997 CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS Opportunities to Improve the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program GAO/NSIAD-97-63 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 National Security and International Affairs Division B-272659 February 11, 1997 The Honorable Strom Thurmond Chairman, Committee on Armed Services United States Senate The Honorable Ted Stevens Chairman, Subcommittee on Defense Committee on Appropriations United States Senate The Honorable Floyd Spence Chairman, Committee on National Security House of Representatives The Honorable C.W. Bill Young Chairman The Honorable John Murtha Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on National Security Committee on Appropriations House of Representatives In response to your requests, we reviewed the Army’s Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP). Under this program, a civilian contractor provides logistics and engineering services to deployed forces. You had expressed concern about the increasing use of this program and reports of its escalating costs for the peacekeeping mission in Bosnia. As agreed with your offices, this report addresses (1) the extent to which the Army is using the program; (2) reasons for increases in the program’s cost for the Bosnia peacekeeping mission; and (3) opportunities to improve program implementation from a doctrine, cost control, and contract oversight standpoint. As requested, it also addresses the potential for inefficiency by having similar support contract programs in the Navy and the Air Force. This report focuses on LOGCAP use during the peacekeeping mission in Bosnia but also includes information on LOGCAP use in Somalia, Rwanda, and Haiti. Details on our scope and methodology are included in appendix I.
    [Show full text]
  • Dyncorp Page 2 of 42
    Competitor Assessment Contract Deliverable Exemplar Price To Win Competitor Assessments Market Analysis Mergers & Acquisitions Strategy Support This ARDAK Corporation Report is Proprietary. © 2020 ARDAK Corporation. All Rights Reserved. ARDAK Competitor Assessment - DynCorp Page 2 of 42 Table of Contents Competitor Assessment .................................................................................................................. 3 DynCorp International – Company Overview ............................................................................ 3 DynCorp International – Operating Segments ............................................................................ 5 DynAviation Segment ................................................................................................................. 6 DynAviation Segment Key Contracts ..................................................................................... 6 DynLogistics Segment ................................................................................................................ 7 DynLogistics Segment Key Contracts .................................................................................... 7 DynCorp International – Selected Financial Information ........................................................... 9 DynCorp International – Financial Performance and Competitive Posture ......................... 10 DynCorp International – Organization ................................................................................. 11 DynCorp International
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Private Military Contractors in American Foreign
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications 2014 Public Wars, Private Warriors: An Analysis of Private Military Contractors in American Foreign and Domestic Policy Phillip Andrew Roughton Eastern Illinois University This research is a product of the graduate program in Political Science at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Roughton, Phillip Andrew, "Public Wars, Private Warriors: An Analysis of Private Military Contractors in American Foreign and Domestic Policy" (2014). Masters Theses. 1364. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/1364 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Graduate School~ EAsTERN lu.t~OIS l\m'FRSITY Thesis Maintenance and Reproduction Certificate FOR: Graduate Candidates Completing Theses in Partial Fulfillment of the Degree Graduate Faculty Advisors Directing the Theses RE: Preservation, Reproduction, and Distribution of Thesis Research Preserving, reproducing, and distributing thesis research is an important part of Booth Library's responsibility to provide access to scholarship. In order to further this goal, Booth Library makes all graduate theses completed as part of a degree program at Eastern Illinois University available for personal study, research, and other not-for-profit educational purposes. Under 17 U.S.C. § 108, the library may reproduce and distribute a copy without infringing on copyright; however, professional courtesy dictates that permission be requested from the author before doing so. Your signatures affirm the following: ii The graduate candidate is the author of this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Growth of the “Camo Economy” and the Commercialization of the Post-9/11 Wars Heidi Peltier1 Boston University June 3
    The Growth of the “Camo Economy” and the Commercialization of the Post-9/11 Wars Heidi Peltier1 Boston University June 30, 2020 Executive Summary Since September 11, 2001, United States military spending has grown rapidly, as has the portion of that spending that pays for military contractors. These contracting companies engineer and manufacture equipment, build and repair infrastructure around the world, provide services like cafeterias and other facilities support, and even replace troops in many war zones. In 2019, the Pentagon spent $370 billion on contracting – more than half the total defense-related discretionary spending, $676 billion, and a whopping 164% higher than its spending on contractors in 2001. Over nearly two decades, government officials, private companies, and conservative think tanks have sold the idea that military contractors are a cost reducer, yet in reality, the growth in military contracting—or what I call the “Camo Economy”—has actually increased the overall cost of this country’s military operations. It’s a Camo Economy because the U.S. government has used the commercialization (often mislabeled “privatization”) of the military as camouflage, concealing the true financial and human costs of America’s post-9/11 wars. Regarding human costs, in 2019, there were 53,000 U.S. contractors compared to 35,000 U.S. troops in the Middle East. Since the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, an estimated 8,000 U.S. contractors have died, in addition to around 7,000 U.S. troops.2 America’s post-9/11 wars, which the Costs of War project defines as U.S.-led military operations and other government programs around the world that have grown out of President George W.
    [Show full text]