King Post Truss Joinery Analysis Case Study
Timber Frame Engineering Council Symposium Burlington, VT August 8, 2013
John Treybal, PE
1 6x12 Ridge 8x10 King Post 5x6 Strut
8x10 Rafter 6x12 Plate 8x12 Tie 8x8 Post
2 Truss Loading
340 plf
2000# 2000# 1000# Compression 1000#
Tension Compression Comp.
Compression Compression
Tension Basis of Design: 1000# • Douglas Fir #1, S4S, unseasoned 1000# • Loads are dead + snow, self•weight included • 24' span • 8:12 pitch • Rafters continuously laterally braced • Pinned connections
Comp. • No friction 3 Strut / Rafter Joint
13100#•in
980#
8260#
1140#
8x10 13100#•in
9140#
2300#
5x6
4 Strut / Rafter Joint
13100#•in
980#
8260#
1140# Failure Modes: 8x10 • Rafter Bearing on Strut
13100#•in • Bending and Compression in Rafter at 9140# Reduced Section
2120#
2300#
880# 5x6
5 Strut / Rafter Joint • Rafter Bearing on Strut (Check 1) 13100#•in 8x10 980#
8260# 1.5" typ.
1140#
8x10 5.6" 5x6 13100#•in 9140# = = 2120#
2300# = 2,120# = 1.5 " ∗ 5.6" ∗ 2 = 16.8 880# 5x6 . ° = 1,020 = . = 625 = > ∴
6 Strut / Rafter Joint • Rafter Bearing on Strut (Check 2) 13100#•in 8x10 980#
8260#
1140#
8x10 5x6
0.75" 4.5" 13100#•in 9140# = = 2120#
2300# = 880# = 0.75" ∗ 4.5" = 3.38 Conservatively ignoring tenon
880# 5x6 bearing – some might argue for using half of it or more . ° = 670 = . = 1,000 ∗ 1.15 = 1,150 = > ∴ 7 Strut / Rafter Joint • Bending and Compression in Rafter at Reduced Section Rafter Net Section Properties: 13100#•in = 58.1 980# = 71.5 8260# Side note: Is there an argumen
compression zone of rafter? 1140# Compression Only: 8x10 8,260# = = = 58.1
13100#•in = 1,000 ∗ 1.15 9140# = , > 142 ∴
2120#
2300# = , > 142 ∴ Bending and Axial Compression Interaction: