Neutrino Signals from Gravitino Dark Matter with Broken R-Parity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Neutrino Signals from Gravitino Dark Matter with Broken R-Parity DESY-THESIS-2008-043 December 2008 Neutrino Signals from Gravitino Dark Matter with Broken R-Parity Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Diplom-Physiker des Departments Physik der Universit¨at Hamburg durchgefuhrt¨ unter der Betreuung von Dr. Laura Covi in der Theory Group am DESY, Hamburg vorgelegt von Michael Grefe arXiv:1111.6041v1 [hep-ph] 25 Nov 2011 aus Luneburg¨ Hamburg September 2008 Gutachter der Diplomarbeit Erstgutachter: Dr. Laura Covi Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Jan Louis Abstract The gravitino is a promising supersymmetric dark matter candidate, even without strict R-parity conservation. In fact, with some small R-parity vio- lation, gravitinos are sufficiently long-lived to constitute the dark matter of the universe, while the resulting cosmological scenario is consistent with primordial nucleosynthesis and the high reheating temperature needed for thermal leptogenesis. Furthermore, in this scenario the gravitino is unstable and might thus be accessible by indirect detection via its decay products. We compute in this thesis the partial decay widths for the gravitino in models with bilinear R-parity breaking. In addition, we determine the neutrino sig- nal from astrophysical gravitino dark matter decays. Finally, we discuss the feasibility of detecting these neutrino signals in present and future neutrino experiments, and conclude that it will be a challenging task. Albeit, if de- tected, this distinctive signal might bring considerable support to the scenario of decaying gravitino dark matter. Zusammenfassung Das Gravitino ist auch ohne strikte R-Parit¨at-Erhaltung ein vielversprechen- der Kandidat fur¨ supersymmetrische dunkle Materie. Tats¨achlich sind Gra- vitinos bei leichter R-Parit¨at-Verletzung genugend¨ langlebig um die dunkle Materie im Universum darzustellen, w¨ahrend das daraus resultierende kosmo- logische Szenario mit primordialer Nukleosynthese und der hohen Reheating- Temperatur, die fur¨ thermische Leptogenese ben¨otigt wird, vereinbar ist. Dar- uber¨ hinaus ist das Gravitino in diesem Szenario instabil und k¨onnte daher durch seine Zerfallsprodukte fur¨ eine indirekte Entdeckung zug¨anglich sein. In dieser Diplomarbeit berechnen wir die partiellen Zerfallsbreiten des Gravi- tinos in Modellen mit bilinearer R-Parit¨at-Brechung. Zudem bestimmen wir das Neutrinosignal astrophysikalischer Zerf¨alle von dunkler Materie, die aus Gravitinos besteht. Schließlich diskutieren wir die M¨oglichkeit diese Neutri- nosignale in heutigen und zukunftigen¨ Neutrinoexperimenten zu beobachten und kommen zu dem Schluss, dass es eine sehr herausfordernde Aufgabe ist. Dessen ungeachtet k¨onnte dieses charakteristische Signal eine deutliche Unterstutzung¨ fur¨ das Szenario zerfallender Gravitinos als dunkler Materie darstellen. Contents Contents i List of Figures iii List of Tables iv Preface 1 1 Dark Matter and the Early Universe 4 1.1 BigBangCosmology ....................... 4 1.2 DarkMatter............................ 11 1.2.1 EvidenceforDarkMatter . 11 1.2.2 Particle Dark Matter Candidates . 14 1.2.3 Direct and Indirect Detection of Dark Matter . 15 2 Supersymmetry, Supergravity and the Gravitino 18 2.1 Supersymmetry .......................... 18 2.2 Supergravity............................ 28 2.3 TheGravitino........................... 29 2.3.1 The Free Massive Gravitino Field . 29 2.3.2 Gravitino Interactions . 32 2.3.3 Gravitino Cosmology . 33 3 Gravitino Decays via Bilinear R-Parity Breaking 35 3.1 Bilinear R-ParityBreaking. .. .. .. 35 3.2 Gravitino Decay Channels . 37 3.2.1 Calculation of Decay Widths . 37 3.2.2 Fragmentation of the Z 0, W and h Bosons . 44 3.2.3 Neutrino Spectra from Gravitino Decays . 46 i Contents 4 Neutrinos as a Probe of Gravitino Dark Matter 49 4.1 Neutrino Signals . 49 4.1.1 Neutrino Fluxes . 49 4.1.2 Neutrino Propagation and Neutrino Oscillations . 54 4.2 NeutrinoBackground. 57 4.2.1 Atmospheric Neutrinos . 57 4.2.2 Further Neutrino Background Sources . 59 4.3 ReductionoftheNeutrinoBackground . 60 4.3.1 Electron and Muon Neutrinos . 61 4.3.2 Tau Neutrinos . 62 4.4 DetectionProspects. 63 4.4.1 Water CerenkovDetectorsˇ . 63 4.4.2 Observability in Super-Kamiokande . 65 4.4.3 FutureDetectors . .. .. .. .. 68 4.5 Constraints on the Gravitino Parameters . 69 5 Conclusions 72 A Units and Physical Constants 74 B Notation, Conventions and Formulae 76 C Calculation of Decay Widths 83 C.1 FeynmanRules .......................... 83 C.2 Kinematics ............................ 86 C.3 Gravitino Decay Channels . 87 D PYTHIA Simulation 96 Acknowledgements 101 Revision History 102 Bibliography 103 ii List of Figures 1.1 Concordance model of cosmology and BBN predictions of the light element abundances. 10 1.2 Typical rotation curve of a galaxy and miscellaneous halo den- sityprofiles. ............................ 12 1.3 Comparison of the angular profile of the flux from decaying and annihilating DM. 16 2.1 Renormalization group evolution of the inverse gauge cou- plings in the SM and the MSSM. 19 3.1 Branching ratios of the gravitino decay channels. 42 3.2 Branching ratios of the SM Higgs boson. 45 3.3 Neutrino injection spectra from gravitino decay. 47 4.1 Neutrinofluxesafterpropagation. 57 4.2 Averaged full-sky neutrino fluxes expected at the Super-K site. 61 4.3 Down-going tau neutrino fluxes expected at the Super-K site. 63 4.4 Cross sections of CC tau neutrino interactions. 64 4.5 Neutrino energies and event topologies. 66 4.6 Tau neutrino events expected at Super-K. 67 4.7 Constraints on the gravitino parameter space. 70 iii List of Tables 1.1 Parameters for miscellaneous halo models. 13 2.1 Gauge supermultiplets of the MSSM. 20 2.2 Chiral supermultiplets of the MSSM. 21 2.3 Gravity supermultiplet. 28 2.4 Clebsch–Gordancoefficients. 31 3.1 Branching ratios of the gravitino decay channels. 43 3.2 Decay modes of the Z0 and W bosons, and the τ lepton. 44 3.3 Numbers of neutrinos and antineutrinos from fragmentation. 45 4.1 Halo flux parameters for different halo models. 54 4.2 Neutrino oscillation parameters. 56 4.3 Values for the parameterization of the corona neutrino flux. 60 iv Preface The nature of the dark matter (DM) in the universe is still one of the unsolved mysteries in modern cosmology. Its existence is strong evidence for physics beyond the Standard Model, but until now the only indication for dark matter is based on its gravitational interaction. One of the most favored solutions to the dark matter problem is the introduction of supersymmetry with conserved R-parity. In this framework, the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) is stable and therefore a natural DM candidate, if it is also neutral and only weakly interacting. The most extensively studied case is where the LSPs are Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) and the dominant contribution to the dark matter in the universe. One of the most interesting candidates is, in fact, the lightest neutralino, since it can be tested in accelerator, direct detection and indirect detection experiments in the near future [1]. On the other hand, it is also possible that dark matter only interacts grav- itationally, and supersymmetry offers also candidates of this type. In local supersymmetry (i.e. supergravity) the gravitino arises as a natural candidate for dark matter. It is the superpartner of the graviton and has been the first supersymmetric dark matter candidate proposed [2]. The gravitino is also one of the most elusive dark matter candidates, since, as part of the gravity multiplet, all its interactions are suppressed either by the Planck scale (for the spin-3/2 component) or by the supersymmetry breaking scale (for the goldstino component). Nonetheless, a high reheating temperature after the inflationary phase in the early universe leads via thermal gravitino production to a relic abundance that can account for the observed dark matter density in the universe and is compatible with baryogenesis via thermal leptogenesis. Typically, the extremely weak interactions of the gravitino cause severe trouble for the standard cosmological scenario, since they make either the gravitino—if it is not the LSP—or the next-to-lightest supersymmetric par- ticle (NLSP) so long-lived that it decays during or after Big Bang Nucle- osynthesis (BBN). Therefore, the successful prediction of the light element abundances can be spoiled (see for instance [3]). 1 Preface However, it was recently proposed that these problems are easily circum- vented if a small breaking of R-parity is introduced [4]. In that case, the neutralino is too short-lived to play the role of dark matter, whereas the gravitino—if it is the LSP—can still have a sufficiently long lifetime, even exceeding the age of the universe by many orders of magnitude. Since the NLSP decays into Standard Model particles via R-parity violating couplings, the cosmology reduces to the standard, non-supersymmetric case well before the onset of BBN. In collider experiments, late decays of the NLSP can be a signature of this gravitino LSP scenario. Another advantage of models with R-parity violation is the fact that gravitino dark matter is no more invisible in astrophysical experiments: Even if the strongly suppressed couplings rule out an observa- tion in direct dark matter detection experiments, the tremendous number of gravitinos in the Milky Way and nearby galaxies compensates for the suppressed decay rate, possibly making gravitino decay products visible in indirect detection experiments. In fact, it has been found in [5, 6, 7] that gravitino dark matter with a life- time of 1026 s and a mass of 150 GeV can account simultaneously for the ∼ ∼ anomalies in the extragalactic gamma-ray flux, suggested by the Energetic Gamma Ray Experiment Telescope (EGRET) [8], and in the positron frac- tion, suggested by the High Energy Antimatter Telescope (HEAT) balloon experiment [9]. Motivated by this coincidence, we compute in this thesis the neutrino signal in the same scenario, both as a consistency check and to find out whether in this scenario an anomalous contribution to the neutrino flux may be expected in present and future neutrino experiments.
Recommended publications
  • Wimps and Machos ENCYCLOPEDIA of ASTRONOMY and ASTROPHYSICS
    WIMPs and MACHOs ENCYCLOPEDIA OF ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS WIMPs and MACHOs objects that could be the dark matter and still escape detection. For example, if the Galactic halo were filled –3 . WIMP is an acronym for weakly interacting massive par- with Jupiter mass objects (10 Mo) they would not have ticle and MACHO is an acronym for massive (astrophys- been detected by emission or absorption of light. Brown . ical) compact halo object. WIMPs and MACHOs are two dwarf stars with masses below 0.08Mo or the black hole of the most popular DARK MATTER candidates. They repre- remnants of an early generation of stars would be simi- sent two very different but reasonable possibilities of larly invisible. Thus these objects are examples of what the dominant component of the universe may be. MACHOs. Other examples of this class of dark matter It is well established that somewhere between 90% candidates include primordial black holes created during and 99% of the material in the universe is in some as yet the big bang, neutron stars, white dwarf stars and vari- undiscovered form. This material is the gravitational ous exotic stable configurations of quantum fields, such glue that holds together galaxies and clusters of galaxies as non-topological solitons. and plays an important role in the history and fate of the An important difference between WIMPs and universe. Yet this material has not been directly detected. MACHOs is that WIMPs are non-baryonic and Since extensive searches have been done, this means that MACHOS are typically (but not always) formed from this mysterious material must not emit or absorb appre- baryonic material.
    [Show full text]
  • MASTER THESIS Linking the B-Physics Anomalies and Muon G
    MSc PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY GRAVITATION, ASTRO-, AND PARTICLE PHYSICS MASTER THESIS Linking the B-physics Anomalies and Muon g − 2 A Phenomenological Study Beyond the Standard Model By Anders Rehult 12623881 February - October 2020 60 EC Supervisor/Examiner: Second Examiner: prof. dr. Robert Fleischer prof. dr. Piet Mulders i Abstract The search for physics beyond the Standard Model is guided by anomalies: discrepancies between the theoretical predictions and experimental measurements of physical quantities. Hints of new physics are found in the recently observed B-physics anomalies and the long-standing anomalous magnetic dipole moment of the muon, muon g − 2. The former include a group of anomalous measurements related to the quark-level transition b ! s. We investigate what features are required of a theory to explain these b ! s anomalies simultaneously with muon g − 2. We then consider three kinds of models that might explain the anomalies: models with leptoquarks, hypothetical particles that couple leptons to quarks; Z0 models, which contain an additional fundamental force and a corresponding force carrier; and supersymmetric scenarios that postulate a symmetry that gives rise to a partner for each SM particle. We identify a leptoquark model that carries the necessary features to explain both kinds of anomalies. Within this model, we study the behaviour of 0 muon g − 2 and the anomalous branching ratio of Bs mesons, bound states of b and s quarks, into muons. 0 ¯0 0 ¯0 The Bs meson can spontaneously oscillate into its antiparticle Bs , a phenomenon known as Bs −Bs mixing. We calculate the effects of this mixing on the anomalous branching ratio.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravitino Dark Matter
    GRAVITINO DARK MATTER Wilfried Buchm¨uller DESY, Hamburg LAUNCH09, Nov. 2009, MPK Heidelberg Why Gravitino Dark Matter? Supergravity predicts the gravitino, analog of W and Z bosons in electroweak theory; may be LSP, natural DM candidate: m < 1keV, hot DM, (Pagels, Primack ’81) • 3/2 1keV < m3/2 < 15keV, warm DM, (Gorbunov, Khmelnitsky, Rubakov ’08) • ∼ ∼ 100keV < m < 10MeV, cold DM, gauge mediation and thermal • 3/2 leptogenesis∼ (Fuji, Ibe,∼ Yanagida ’03); recently proven to be correct by F-theory (Heckman, Tavanfar, Vafa ’08) 10GeV < m < 1TeV, cold DM, gaugino/gravity mediation and • 3/2 thermal leptogenesis∼ ∼ (Bolz, WB, Pl¨umacher ’98) Baryogenesis, (gravitino) DM and primordial nucleosynthesis (BBN) strongly correlated in cosmological history. 1 Gravitino Problem Thermally produced gravitino number density grows with reheating temperature after inflation (Khlopov, Linde ’83; Ellis, Kim, Nanopoulos ’84;...), n3/2 α3 2 TR. nγ ∝ Mp For unstable gravitinos, nucleosynthesis implies stringent upper bound on reheating temperature TR (Kawasaki, Kohri, Moroi ’05; ...), T < (1) 105 GeV, R O × hence standard mSUGRA with neutralino LSP incompatible with baryogenesis via thermal leptogenesis where T 1010 GeV !! R ∼ Possible way out: Gravitino LSP, explains dark matter! 2 Gravitino Virtue Can one understand the amount of dark matter, ΩDM 0.23, with Ω = ρ /ρ , if gravitinos are dominant component, i.e. Ω≃ Ω ? DM DM c DM ≃ 3/2 Production mechanisms: (i) WIMP decays, i.e., ‘Super-WIMPs’ (Covi, Kim, Roszkowski ’99; Feng, Rajaraman, Takayama ’03), m3/2 Ω3/2 = ΩNLSP , mNLSP independent of initial temperature TR (!), but inconsistent with BBN constraints; (ii) Thermal production, from 2 2 QCD processes, → 2 TR 100GeV mg˜(µ) Ω3/2h 0.5 10 .
    [Show full text]
  • Super-Higgs in Superspace
    Article Super-Higgs in Superspace Gianni Tallarita 1,* and Moritz McGarrie 2 1 Departamento de Ciencias, Facultad de Artes Liberales, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago 7941169, Chile 2 Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, DESY, Notkestrasse 85, 22607 Hamburg, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Received: 1 April 2019; Accepted: 10 June 2019; Published: 14 June 2019 Abstract: We determine the effective gravitational couplings in superspace whose components reproduce the supergravity Higgs effect for the constrained Goldstino multiplet. It reproduces the known Gravitino sector while constraining the off-shell completion. We show that these couplings arise by computing them as quantum corrections. This may be useful for phenomenological studies and model-building. We give an example of its application to multiple Goldstini. Keywords: supersymmetry; Goldstino; superspace 1. Introduction The spontaneous breakdown of global supersymmetry generates a massless Goldstino [1,2], which is well described by the Akulov-Volkov (A-V) effective action [3]. When supersymmetry is made local, the Gravitino “eats” the Goldstino of the A-V action to become massive: The super-Higgs mechanism [4,5]. In terms of superfields, the constrained Goldstino multiplet FNL [6–12] is equivalent to the A-V formulation (see also [13–17]). It is, therefore, natural to extend the description of supergravity with this multiplet, in superspace, to one that can reproduce the super-Higgs mechanism. In this paper we address two issues—first we demonstrate how the Gravitino, Goldstino, and multiple Goldstini obtain a mass. Secondly, by using the Spurion analysis, we write down the most minimal set of new terms in superspace that incorporate both supergravity and the Goldstino multiplet in order to reproduce the super-Higgs mechanism of [5,18] at lowest order in M¯ Pl.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravitino Dark Matter with Constraints from Higgs Boson Mass …
    Vol. 44 (2013) ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA B No 11 GRAVITINO DARK MATTER WITH CONSTRAINTS FROM HIGGS BOSON MASS AND SNEUTRINO DECAYS∗ L. Roszkowskiy, S. Trojanowski National Centre for Nuclear Research, Hoża 69, 00-681, Warszawa, Poland K. Turzyński Institute of Theoretical Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw Hoża 69, 00-681, Warszawa, Poland K. Jedamzik Laboratoire de Physique Theorique et Astroparticules, UMR5207-CRNS Université Montpellier II, 34095 Montpellier, France (Received October 21, 2013) We investigate gravitino dark matter produced thermally at high tem- peratures and in decays of a long-lived sneutrino in the framework of the Non-Universal Higgs Model (NUHM). We apply relevant collider and cos- mological bounds. Generally, we find allowed values of the reheating tem- 9 perature TR below 10 GeV, i.e. somewhat smaller than the values needed for thermal leptogenesis, even with a conservative lower bound of 122 GeV on the Higgs boson mass. Requiring mass values closer to 126 GeV implies 7 TR below 10 GeV and the gravitino mass less than 10 GeV. DOI:10.5506/APhysPolB.44.2367 PACS numbers: 14.80.Ly, 14.80.Da, 95.35.+d, 26.35.+c Gravitino as the lightest supersymmetric particle is a well-motivated dark matter (DM) candidate. It is extremely weakly interacting and hence can escape detection in direct searches. Scenarios with gravitino DM can be, however, strongly constrained by the Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN). ∗ Presented at the XXXVII International Conference of Theoretical Physics “Matter to the Deepest” Ustroń, Poland, September 1–6, 2013. y On leave of absence from the University of Sheffield, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of Matter
    STRUCTURE OF MATTER Discoveries and Mysteries Part 2 Rolf Landua CERN Particles Fields Electromagnetic Weak Strong 1895 - e Brownian Radio- 190 Photon motion activity 1 1905 0 Atom 191 Special relativity 0 Nucleus Quantum mechanics 192 p+ Wave / particle 0 Fermions / Bosons 193 Spin + n Fermi Beta- e Yukawa Antimatter Decay 0 π 194 μ - exchange 0 π 195 P, C, CP τ- QED violation p- 0 Particle zoo 196 νe W bosons Higgs 2 0 u d s EW unification νμ 197 GUT QCD c Colour 1975 0 τ- STANDARD MODEL SUSY 198 b ντ Superstrings g 0 W Z 199 3 generations 0 t 2000 ν mass 201 0 WEAK INTERACTION p n Electron (“Beta”) Z Z+1 Henri Becquerel (1900): Beta-radiation = electrons Two-body reaction? But electron energy/momentum is continuous: two-body two-body momentum energy W. Pauli (1930) postulate: - there is a third particle involved + + - neutral - very small or zero mass p n e 휈 - “Neutrino” (Fermi) FERMI THEORY (1934) p n Point-like interaction e 휈 Enrico Fermi W = Overlap of the four wave functions x Universal constant G -5 2 G ~ 10 / M p = “Fermi constant” FERMI: PREDICTION ABOUT NEUTRINO INTERACTIONS p n E = 1 MeV: σ = 10-43 cm2 휈 e (Range: 1020 cm ~ 100 l.yr) time Reines, Cowan (1956): Neutrino ‘beam’ from reactor Reactions prove existence of neutrinos and then ….. THE PREDICTION FAILED !! σ ‘Unitarity limit’ > 100 % probability E2 ~ 300 GeV GLASGOW REFORMULATES FERMI THEORY (1958) p n S. Glashow W(eak) boson Very short range interaction e 휈 If mass of W boson ~ 100 GeV : theory o.k.
    [Show full text]
  • Elementary Particle Physics from Theory to Experiment
    Elementary Particle Physics From Theory to Experiment Carlos Wagner Physics Department, EFI and KICP, Univ. of Chicago HEP Division, Argonne National Laboratory Society of Physics Students, Univ. of Chicago, Nov. 10, 2014 Particle Physics studies the smallest pieces of matter, 1 1/10.000 1/100.000 1/100.000.000 and their interactions. Friday, November 2, 2012 Forces and Particles in Nature Gravitational Force Electromagnetic Force Attractive force between 2 massive objects: Attracts particles of opposite charge k e e F = 1 2 d2 1 G = 2 MPl Forces within atoms and between atoms Proportional to product of masses + and - charges bind together Strong Force and screen each other Assumes interaction over a distance d ==> comes from properties of spaceAtoms and timeare made fromElectrons protons, interact with protons via quantum neutrons and electrons. Strong nuclear forceof binds e.m. energy together : the photons protons and neutrons to form atoms nuclei Strong nuclear force binds! togethers! =1 m! = 0 protons and neutrons to form nuclei protonD. I. S. of uuelectronsd formedwith Modeled protons by threeor by neutrons a theoryquarks, based bound on together Is very weak unless one ofneutron theat masses high energies is huge,udd shows by thatthe U(1)gluons gauge of thesymmetry strong interactions like the earth protons and neutrons SU (3) c are not fundamental Friday,p November! u u d 2, 2012 formed by three quarks, bound together by n ! u d d the gluons of the strong interactions Modeled by a theory based on SU ( 3 ) C gauge symmetry we see no free quarks Very strong at large distances confinement " in nature ! Weak Force Force Mediating particle transformations Observation of Beta decay demands a novel interaction Weak Force Short range forces exist only inside the protons 2 and neutrons, with massive force carriers: gauge bosons ! W and Z " MW d FW ! e / d Similar transformations explain the non-observation of heavier elementary particles in our everyday experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Week 3: Thermal History of the Universe
    Week 3: Thermal History of the Universe Cosmology, Ay127, Spring 2008 April 21, 2008 1 Brief Overview Before moving on, let’s review some of the high points in the history of the Universe: T 10−4 eV, t 1010 yr: today; baryons and the CMB are entirely decoupled, stars and • ∼ ∼ galaxies have been around a long time, and clusters of galaxies (gravitationally bound systems of 1000s of galaxies) are becoming common. ∼ T 10−3 eV, t 109 yr; the first stars and (small) galaxies begin to form. • ∼ ∼ T 10−1−2 eV, t millions of years: baryon drag ends; at earlier times, the baryons are still • ∼ ∼ coupled to the CMB photons, and so perturbations in the baryon cannot grow; before this time, the gas distribution in the Universe remains smooth. T eV, t 400, 000 yr: electrons and protons combine to form hydrogen atoms, and CMB • ∼ ∼ photons decouple; at earlier times, photons are tightly coupled to the baryon fluid through rapid Thomson scattering from free electrons. T 3 eV, t 10−(4−5) yrs: matter-radiation equality; at earlier times, the energy den- • ∼ ∼ sity of the Universe is dominated by radiation. Nothing really spectacular happens at this time, although perturbations in the dark-matter density can begin to grow, providing seed gravitational-potential wells for what will later become the dark-matter halos that house galaxies and clusters of galaxies. T keV, t 105 sec; photons fall out of chemical equilibrium. At earlier times, interac- • ∼ ∼ tions that can change the photon number occur rapidly compared with the expansion rate; afterwards, these reactions freeze out and CMB photons are neither created nor destroyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraints on the Mass of the Superlight Gravitino from the Muon Anomaly
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by CERN Document Server UAB–FT–416 Constraints on the mass of the superlight gravitino from the muon anomaly F.Ferrer and J.A.Grifols Grup de F´ısica Te`orica and Institut de F´ısica d’Altes Energies, Universitat Aut`onoma de Barcelona, E–08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain (April 1997) Abstract We reexamine the limits on the gravitino mass supplied by the muon anomaly in the frame of supergravity models with a superlight gravitino and a su- perlight scalar S and a superlight pseudoscalar P . PACS number(s): 14.80.Ly, 13.40.Em, 04.65.+e, 12.60.Jv Typeset using REVTEX 1 In a wide class of supergravity models with SUSY breaking scale in the TeV range, 2 the gravitino can be very light (m3/2 ∼ MSUSY /MPl). In fact, its mass could lie anywhere between µeV and keV . Examples for this are those models where gauge interactions mediate the breakdown of supersymmetry [1] or models where an anomalous U(1) gauge symmetry induces SUSY breaking [2]. Also, no–scale models can accomodate superlight gravitinos [3]. Clearly, it is important to bound and eventually determine the mass of the gravitino. To mention only an instance where the gravitino mass is of great physical significance, let us recall that a mass on the order of a few keV can be relevant for the dark matter problem. The sources of direct (laboratory) information on the gravitino mass are rare [4–7] and perhaps the best one comes from the (g − 2)µ of the muon [6,7].
    [Show full text]
  • Supersymmetry in the Shadow of Photini
    Photini in the UV Photini in the IR Photini at the LHC Supersymmetry in the shadow of photini Ken Van Tilburg August 24, 2012 In collaboration with: Masha Baryakhtar (Stanford), Nathaniel Craig (Rutgers, IAS) Reference: arXiv:1206.0751; JHEP 1207 (2012) 164 Arvanitaki et al: arXiv:0909:5440; Phys.Rev.D81 (2010) 075018 1/6 Photini in the UV Photini in the IR Photini at the LHC Table of contents 1 Photini in the UV 2 Photini in the IR 3 Photini at the LHC 2/6 Photini in the UV Photini in the IR Photini at the LHC Photini in the UV Main features of string theory: 1 supersymmetry assume broken at low energy to solve hierarchy problem 2 extra dimensions (6) assume small size generically complex compactification manifold to get SM very simple manifold: 6-torus ! six 1- and 5-cycles, fifteen 2- and 4-cycles, twenty 3-cycles IIB string theory: 4-form gauge field integrated over 3-cycle i R ! 4D vector gauge field without charged matter Aµ = C4 Σi string theory ! SUSY SM many extra \photon" superfields without any charged matter can in principle mix with U(1) hypercharge and among each other 3/6 Photini in the UV Photini in the IR Photini at the LHC Photini in the IR in SUSY limit, no observable effect: Z 2 L ⊃ d θ WaWa + WbWb − 2WaWb shift away mixing: W ! W − W and g ! p ga b b a a 1−2 physical effects from SUSY breaking, when gauginos get mass y µ δL ⊃ zijλi iσ @µλj − mijλi λj expect sizeable number of photini to be lighter than the bino bino-photino + interphotini cascade via emissions of h; Z; γ 4/6 gluino-bino model gluino-squark-bino model drastically weakened hadronic search limits: slightly enhanced leptonic search sensitivity: Photini in the UV Photini in the IR Photini at the LHC Photini at the LHC reduction of missing ET 1.0 bino 150 GeV L .
    [Show full text]
  • General Neutralino NLSP with Gravitino Dark Matter Vs. Big Bang Nucleosynthesis
    General Neutralino NLSP with Gravitino Dark Matter vs. Big Bang Nucleosynthesis II. Institut fur¨ Theoretische Physik, Universit¨at Hamburg Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Theory Group Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Diplom-Physiker (diploma thesis - with correction) Verfasser: Jasper Hasenkamp Matrikelnummer: 5662889 Studienrichtung: Physik Eingereicht am: 31.3.2009 Betreuer(in): Dr. Laura Covi, DESY Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Gun¨ ter Sigl, Universit¨at Hamburg ii Abstract We study the scenario of gravitino dark matter with a general neutralino being the next- to-lightest supersymmetric particle (NLSP). Therefore, we compute analytically all 2- and 3-body decays of the neutralino NLSP to determine the lifetime and the electro- magnetic and hadronic branching ratio of the neutralino decaying into the gravitino and Standard Model particles. We constrain the gravitino and neutralino NLSP mass via big bang nucleosynthesis and see how those bounds are relaxed for a Higgsino or a wino NLSP in comparison to the bino neutralino case. At neutralino masses & 1 TeV, a wino NLSP is favoured, since it decays rapidly via a newly found 4-vertex. The Higgsino component becomes important, when resonant annihilation via heavy Higgses can occur. We provide the full analytic results for the decay widths and the complete set of Feyn- man rules necessary for these computations. This thesis closes any gap in the study of gravitino dark matter scenarios with neutralino NLSP coming from approximations in the calculation of the neutralino decay rates and its hadronic branching ratio. Zusammenfassung Diese Diplomarbeit befasst sich mit dem Gravitino als Dunkler Materie, wobei ein allge- meines Neutralino das n¨achstleichteste supersymmetrische Teilchen (NLSP) ist.
    [Show full text]
  • Abdus Salam United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization International XAO100669 Centre •I,'
    the IC/2000/182 abdus salam united nations educational, scientific and cultural organization international XAO100669 centre •i,' international atomic energy agency for theoretical physics " F ^9 -- •.'— -> J AXINO PRODUCTION IN e+e" AND yy COLLISIONS Hoang Ngoc Long and Dang Van Soa 32/ 17 Available at: http://www.ictp.trieste.it/~pub-off IC/2000/182 United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization and International Atomic Energy Agency THE ABDUS SALAM INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS AXINO PRODUCTION IN e+e" AND 77 COLLISIONS Hoang Ngoc Long Institute of Physics, NCST, P.O. Box 429, Bo Ho, Hanoi 10000, Vietnam1 and The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy and Dang Van Soa Department of Physics, Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, Dong Ngac, Tu Liem, Hanoi, Vietnam1 and The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy. Abstract Production of axinos and photinos in e+e~ and 77 collisions is calculated and estimated. It is shown that there is an upper limit of the cross section for the process e~e+ —> ayc dependent only on the breaking scale. For the process 77 —> aac, there is a special direction in which axinos are mainly produced. Behaviour of cross section for this process is also analysed. Based on the result a new constraint for F/N is derived: j^ > 1014 GeV. MIRAMARE - TRIESTE December 2000 1 Permanent address. Axinos - supersymmetric partners of axions [1-3] are predicted in low-energy supersym- metry and the Peccei-Quinn (PQ) solution. The axino is an electrically and color neutral particle with mass highly dependent of the models [4-6].
    [Show full text]