Illegal Immigration

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Illegal Immigration San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Current Controversies Political Science Spring 2007 CURRENT CONTROVERSIES, Vol. I, Spring 2007 San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/controversies Recommended Citation San Jose State University, "CURRENT CONTROVERSIES, Vol. I, Spring 2007" (2007). Current Controversies. Paper 2. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/controversies/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Political Science at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Current Controversies by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CURRENT CONTROVERSIES: Volume One, Spring 2007 IN THE SHADOWS OF IMMIGRATION Mohammad Huweih , Editor-in-Chief The first in a Series of journals written by students in Political Science 100W 1 ShadoIS Current Controversies: Immigration A Foreword The issue of immigration is very controversial, and with that controversy there are many opinions. Clicking through television, you can find shows that discuss immigration almost every day. On CNN, Lou Dobbs, on CNN Headline News, Glenn Beck, among others, drill the issue to their viewers constantly. Going to the radio, many others have brought up the issue. Rush Limbaugh, one of the most popular radio hosts, among many others, has discussed the issue on the radio. According to the Associated Press, immigration in the month of June, 2007 has exceeded the War in Iraq as the most talked about issue. The talk radio and television talk shows have affected the public’s perspective on immigration. In fact, the politicians are also slowly changing their minds, and even taking suggestions made by the talk radio hosts. In the Current Controversies series, the issue at hand is immigration. With so much talk about the issue, it is very difficult to know what is fact and what is fiction regarding immigration. We are in The Shadows of Immigration, and in the shadows of a debate about an issue that will shape the coming decades of the United States. The United States is at a crossroads. With illegal immigration, border problems, the threat of terrorism, drug trafficking, the United States will shape its future based on the resolution on the table or other upcoming resolutions. This journal is here to inform the reader what is fact and what is not regarding immigration. The goal, after reading the journal, is to be an informed and educated Current Controversies: Immigration B resident of the United States. When a person brings up immigration, the reader would be able to know whether the person knows what he or she is talking about. The journal is broken up into different sections that touch on different aspects of immigration. Section one, edited by Mohammad Huweih, deals with the history and policy of immigration, opening up the subject to the reader. It covers the reason for regulations, the history of it, and closes off with an article discussing the United States approach to ethnicity in immigration. Section two is split into six sub sections. Section two covers illegal immigration. The sub sections are -sources of illegal immigration, edited by Eric Breitenfield -economic issues, edited by Steven Neese -state costs, edited by Eric Breitenfield -exploitation, edited by Gabriela Hill -social issues, edited by Gabriela Hill -security, edited by Steven Neese. The last article closes off sub section six, with security and the issue of terrorism. Section three covers proposed legislation in the year 2007, written by Vanessa De Los Reyes-Lopez. Section four concludes the journal, written by Steven Neese. Mohammad Huweih Editor in chief Current Controversies: Immigration C Current Controversies: In the Shadows of Immigration Volume One 2007 Mohammad Huweih, Editor in Chief Eric Breitenfield, Copy Editor Gabriela Hill, Copy Editor Steven Neese, Copy Editor Vanessa De Los Reyes-Lopez, Graphics Editor Karina Diaz, Circulation Manager Amanda Baker, Circulation Staff Maria Contreras, Circulation Staff Natasha Lewis, Circulation Staff Miriam Mohammadi, Circulation Staff Anngeli Salvacion, Circulation Staff Professor Frances L. Edwards, Publisher and Production San Jose State University College of Social Sciences Department of Political Science TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Current Controversies: Immigration D Foreword B I. History and policy of immigration Reasons for immigration regulation 2 History of U.S. immigration policy 18 Examining the significance of ethnicity in America’s approach to 32 immigration Immigration and family reunification 50 Amnesty 66 II. Illegal Immigration A. Sources of illegal immigration China 82 Russia 100 Africa 115 Illegal immigration into Mexico 135 B. Economic issues Exportation of capital in the form of remittances 148 C. State costs Health care and schools 173 Immigration policy and public health 189 Social security and border patrol 203 Illegal immigrants and law enforcement 213 Illegal immigration and local programs 228 D. Exploitation Exploitation of immigrant children and their labor 248 Illegal immigration and the sex trade 263 E. Social Issues Focus on New Orleans 284 Illegal immigration and housing impacts 302 E. Security The Wall along the border: costs and benefits 317 Military build-up at the United States-Mexico border 332 Immigration and terrorism: is there a link? 348 III. 2007 Proposed Legislation 372 IV. Conclusion 376 Current Controversies: Immigration E History and Policy of Immigration Current Controversies: Immigration 1 Reasons for Immigration Regulation By Mohammad Huweih I. Abstract Immigration can best be described in waves. War and Depression ends those waves. The three waves were from 1820 to 1860, 1880 to 1914, and 1965 to the present. During these three waves, legislation in 1921, 1924, 1965, and 1986 have shaped the trend of immigration. Since the immigration reforms of 1965, immigration has increased greatly and caused new debates to the immigration issue. The Act of 1986 opened the issue to illegal immigration, predominantly Mexico. The debate and reasons for immigration today is because of tradition, population control, and social strains. II. Thesis Employment and the chances that unskilled immigrants would take unskilled native work, overpopulation and the environmental degradation that occurs, social strife because of lack of assimilation, and how the actors (media and state) deal with the issue of immigration has affected US immigration history since 1820. III. Background A. Introduction Before the issue of immigration can be discussed, the term has to be defined. The act of immigration is when a person goes from one territory of one government, and enters another territory of another government (Brown, 1999, p. xi). Settlers that moved from Europe to the Americas were not immigrants because the American territory was under European control. Another definition of immigrants, as defined by the United States of America (USA), is of those that plan to reside in the US permanently that come Current Controversies: Immigration 2 from another country that is not under US control. People that come here as tourists, temporary workers, or students are not considered immigrants; rather they would be nonimmigrant and are not part of the statistics of immigration. Immigration can best be described in waves. There are three waves of immigration in US history. Each wave is characterized by a high number of immigrants generally from a handful of countries. Between the waves there are usually wars, depression, and a change in public perception that requires Congress to limit or at times stop immigration (Brown, 1999, p. xvii). The rationale for regulating or not regulating immigration changes depending on the events at that time. Wars and depression mark the end of a wave, and the end of the wars and depression sometimes mark the beginning of a new wave. The first wave of immigrants was from 1820 to 1860. It ended right before the Civil War and the depression that followed it. The second wave was from 1880 to 1914. It ended right before the First World War. The Great Depression, the Second World War, and the beginning of the Cold War all were factors for the reason the third wave took very long to start. The third wave began after new legislation was passed in 1965. No large-scale war or depression has occurred since then. B. The First and Second Wave The first wave started when immigration began to be measured in 1820 (Brown, 1999, p. xvii). Some speculate that before 1820, immigration was limited because of the War of 1812. The end of the war might have been a factor in the surge in immigration in the 1820s. Current Controversies: Immigration 3 This first wave was characterized by an ever expanding frontier, a fairly stable nation politically, and the need for labor. The annual immigration rate continued to increase, until it dropped and stabilized after the wave ended (Edmonston & Smith, 1997, p. 32). The end of the wave occurred in 1860, and was the result of the political unrest that brought about the Civil War in 1861. The war was followed by a depression in the economy. Depressions are characterized by a high supply of labor and a low demand for that labor. When immigrants come into the US during a depression, they could not find a job and would not benefit from the move. The second wave began in 1880. The frontier was still expanding, and the depression had ended, while conditions in Europe were politically unstable. Mostly Italians, Russians, and Eastern Europeans came into the country at this period (Brown, 1999, p. xviii). This period showed record numbers of immigrants. The level of immigration per 1000 residents reached over 10 in the 1910s. (Edmonston & Smith, 1997, p. 33). These rates of immigration numbers are far higher than recent years. B. Restriction By Race Even during the second wave there was a movement to limit immigration from some countries. The first exclusionary legislation was past against the Chinese after an increase in population in the West because of the need for labor.
Recommended publications
  • No. 20-17132 in the UNITED STATES COURT of APPEALS
    Case: 20-17132, 11/20/2020, ID: 11901254, DktEntry: 22-6, Page 1 of 63 No. 20-17132 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. 4:20-cv-4887-JSW The Hon. James S. White DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS’ EXCERPTS OF RECORD Volume 6 of 6 ER 958–1018 JEFFREY BOSSERT CLARK JOSHUA S. PRESS Acting Assistant Attorney General Trial Attorney WILLIAM C. PEACHEY United States Department of Justice Civil Division, Director Office of Immigration Litigation MATTHEW J. GLOVER District Court Section Senior Counsel to the Assistant P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Attorney General Washington, DC 20044 GLENN M. GIRDHARRY Phone: (202) 305-0106 Assistant Director Fax: (202) 305-7000 e-Mail: [email protected] AARON S. GOLDSMITH Senior Litigation Counsel Attorneys for Defendants-Appellants Case: 20-17132, 11/20/2020, ID: 11901254, DktEntry: 22-6, Page 2 of 63 TABLE OF CONTENTS ECF DATE DESCRIPTION PAGES No. 1 07/21/2020 Complaint ER 0958 11/13/2020 District Court Docket Sheet ER 1001 Case:Case 20-17132, 3:20-cv-04887 11/20/2020, Document ID: 11901254, 1 Filed DktEntry: 07/21/20 22-6, Page Page 1 of 343 of 63 1 MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP Paul W. Hughes (Pro Hac Vice to be filed) 2 [email protected] Michael B. Kimberly (Pro Hac Vice to be filed) 3 [email protected] 500 North Capitol Street NW 4 Washington, DC 20001 5 (202) 756-8000 6 MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP William G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Eye, Summer 2010
    Right-Wing Co-Opts Civil Rights Movement History, p. 3 TheA PUBLICATION OF POLITICAL R PublicEyeESEARCH ASSOCIATES Summer 2010 • Volume XXV, No.2 Basta Dobbs! Last year, a coalition of Latino/a groups suc - cessfully fought to remove anti-immigrant pundit Lou Dobbs from CNN. Political Research Associates Executive DirectorTarso Luís Ramos spoke to Presente.org co-founder Roberto Lovato to find out how they did it. Tarso Luís Ramos: Tell me about your organization, Presente.org. Roberto Lovato: Presente.org, founded in MaY 2009, is the preeminent online Latino adVocacY organiZation. It’s kind of like a MoVeOn.org for Latinos: its goal is to build Latino poWer through online and offline organiZing. Presente started With a campaign to persuade GoVernor EdWard Rendell of PennsYlVania to take a stand against the Verdict in the case of Luis RamíreZ, an undocumented immigrant t t e Who Was killed in Shenandoah, PennsYl - k n u l Vania, and Whose assailants Were acquitted P k c a J bY an all-White jurY. We also ran a campaign / o t o to support the nomination of Sonia h P P SotomaYor to the Supreme Court—We A Students rally at a State Board of Education meeting, Austin, Texas, March 10, 2010 produced an “I Stand With SotomaYor” logo and poster that people could displaY at Work or in their neighborhoods and post on their Facebook pages—and a feW addi - From Schoolhouse to Statehouse tional, smaller campaigns, but reallY the Curriculum from a Christian Nationalist Worldview Basta Dobbs! continues on page 12 By Rachel Tabachnick TheTexas Curriculum IN THIS ISSUE Controversy objectiVe is present—a Christian land goV - 1 Editorial .
    [Show full text]
  • The Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense: an Assessment
    DEFENSE BUSINESS BOARD Submitted to the Secretary of Defense The Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense: An Assessment DBB FY 20-01 An assessment of the effectiveness, responsibilities, and authorities of the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense as required by §904 of the FY20 NDAA June 1, 2020 DBB FY20-01 CMO Assessment 1 Executive Summary Tasking and Task Force: The Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) (Public Law (Pub. L. 116-92) required the Secretary of Defense (SD) to conduct an independent assessment of the Chief Management Officer (CMO) with six specific areas to be evaluated. The Defense Business Board (DBB) was selected on February 3, 2020 to conduct the independent assessment, with Arnold Punaro and Atul Vashistha assigned to co-chair the effort. Two additional DBB board members comprised the task force: David Walker and David Van Slyke. These individuals more than meet the independence and competencies required by the NDAA. Approach: The DBB task force focused on the CMO office and the Department of Defense (DoD) business transformation activities since 2008 when the office was first established by the Congress as the Deputy Chief Management Officer (DCMO), and in 2018 when the Congress increased its statutory authority and elevated it to Executive Level (EX) II and the third ranking official in DoD. The taskforce reviewed all previous studies of DoD management and organizations going back twenty years and completed over ninety interviews, including current and former DoD, public and private sector leaders. The assessments of CMO effectiveness since 2008 are focused on the performance of the CMO as an organizational entity, and is not an appraisal of any administration or appointee.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Broken Borders' and Stone Walls
    Talk of ‘Broken Borders’ and Stone Walls 21 Talk of ‘Broken Borders’ and Stone Walls: Anti-immigrant Discourse and Legislation from California to South Carolina Ann Kingsolver University of South Carolina The anti-immigrant sentiments that propelled the passage of California Proposition 187 in 1994 – linked to an economic downturn and worries about NAFTA – have been echoed across the U.S. over the intervening sixteen years. This article briefly reviews public discourse about anti-immigrant legislation in a wave of other states from California to South Carolina, and discusses the convergence of anti- immigrant and white supremacist projects in the U.S., using the concepts of market citizenship and citizen surveillance. As new anti-immigrant legislation is proposed in the South, understanding it within its national and historical context is important. This discussion includes consideration of the role of metaphor in both fueling and countering anti-immigrant discourse. Anti-immigrant discourse: ‘broken’ borders and stone walls Legislation that may be worded in terms of protecting U.S. or state citizens but be referred to in public discourse as anti-immigration or anti-immigrant legislation has been making its way through statehouses across the U.S. over the past decade and a half. This is the latest round of legislation blaming recent immigrants (often from a specific nation or set of nations) for economic hardship or criminal activity in the U.S., which is portrayed as possible to alleviate with the removal or barring of undocumented or “illegal immigrants.” The research question taken up here is: what larger discursive projects (e.g., racializing projects, cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Troubled Neighbor Mexico’S Drug Violence Poses a Threat to the United States by Ted Galen Carpenter
    3597_PA631_1stClass:3597_PA631_1stClass 1/15/2009 9:43 AM Page 1 No. 631 February 2, 2009 Troubled Neighbor Mexico’s Drug Violence Poses a Threat to the United States by Ted Galen Carpenter Executive Summary While U.S. leaders have focused on actual or oughly corrupted by drug money. Washington has illusory security threats in distant regions, there is rewarded Calderón’s government by implement- a troubling security problem brewing much closer ing the initial stage of the so-called Mérida to home. Violence in Mexico, mostly related to the Initiative. In June 2008, Congress approved a $400 trade in illegal drugs, has risen sharply in recent million installment modeled on Plan Colombia, years and shows signs of becoming even worse. the anti-drug assistance measure for Colombia That violence involves turf fights among the vari- and other drug-source countries in the Andean ous drug-trafficking organizations as they seek to region. That program, now in its ninth year, has control access to the lucrative U.S. market. To an already cost more than $5 billion, without signifi- increasing extent, the violence also entails fighting cantly reducing the flow of drugs coming out of between drug traffickers and Mexican military South America. The Mérida Initiative will likely and police forces. cost billions and be equally ineffectual. The carnage has already reached the point that Abandoning the prohibitionist model of deal- the U.S. State Department has issued travel alerts ing with the drug problem is the only effective way for Americans traveling in Mexico. U.S. tourism to to stem the violence in Mexico and its spillover cities on Mexico’s border with the United States, into the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • SPANISH FORK PAGES 1-20.Indd
    November 14 - 20, 2008 SPANISH FORK CABLE GUIDE 9 Friday Prime Time, November 14 4 P.M. 4:30 5 P.M. 5:30 6 P.M. 6:30 7 P.M. 7:30 8 P.M. 8:30 9 P.M. 9:30 10 P.M. 10:30 11 P.M. 11:30 BASIC CABLE Oprah Winfrey b News (N) b CBS Evening News (N) b Entertainment Ghost Whisperer “Threshold” The Price Is Right Salutes the NUMB3RS “Charlie Don’t Surf” News (N) b (10:35) Late Show With David Late Late Show KUTV 2 News-Couric Tonight (N) b Troops (N) b (N) b Letterman (N) KJZZ 3 High School Football The Insider Frasier Friends Friends Fortune Jeopardy! Dr. Phil b News (N) Sports News Scrubs Scrubs Entertain The Insider The Ellen DeGeneres Show Ac- News (N) World News- News (N) Access Holly- Supernanny “Howat Family” (N) Super-Manny (N) b 20/20 b News (N) (10:35) Night- Access Holly- (11:36) Extra KTVX 4 tor Nathan Lane. (N) Gibson wood (N) b line (N) wood (N) (N) b News (N) b News (N) b News (N) b NBC Nightly News (N) b News (N) b Deal or No Deal A teacher returns Crusoe “Hour 6 -- Long Pig” (N) Lipstick Jungle (N) b News (N) b (10:35) The Tonight Show With Late Night KSL 5 News (N) to finish her game. b Jay Leno (N) b TBS 6 Raymond Friends Seinfeld Seinfeld ‘The Wizard of Oz’ (G, ’39) Judy Garland. (8:10) ‘Shrek’ (’01) Voices of Mike Myers.
    [Show full text]
  • Undocumented, Not Illegal: Beyond the Rhetoric of Immigration Coverage
    NACLA REPORT ON THE AMERICAS mala MEDIA ACCURACY mala ON LATIN AMERICA www.nacla.org/mala Undocumented, Not Illegal: Beyond the Rhetoric of Immigration Coverage By Angelica Rubio N JUNE , PULITZER PRIZE WINNER JOSE ANTONIO VAR - the country. According to a 2008 report by the gas came out as an undocumented person. Southern Poverty Law Center, the number of hate I Many advocates were inspired by his story groups rose from 602 in 2000 to 888 in 2007—a because it put a face on the millions of undocu- 48% increase. In 2007, the SPLC added the mented immigrants living in the shadows of U.S. 250,000-member Federation for American Immi- society. Unfortunately, rather than participate in gration Reform (FAIR) to its “list of hate group” for the discussion, the mainstream media ignited a the organization’s baseless anti-immigrant “theories, firestorm. As Colorlines’s Mónica Novoa carefully coupled with a history of ties to white supremacist explained the following day, Vargas’s story drew groups.”3 FAIR is largely funded by wealthy racists, “enormous media attention and drove ‘undocu- such as John Tanton, who also helped to found the mented immigrant’ up to a top-trending term on Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), and Numbers Twitter. But it’s a shame that in the dissection USA, creating a veritable anti- immigrant empire in and retelling of his story, a fine point has been the mid-1990s. According to The New York Times lost on many of Vargas’ colleagues: He came out these groups were influential in the congressional specifically as an undocumented immigrant and defeat of the Dream Act in 2010, and the drafting not as ‘illegal.’ ”1 of Arizona’s notorious SB 1070 legislation.4 State The Vargas story is a telling example of the legislatures in Alabama and Georgia have followed media coverage of the immigration debate in the suite, passing legislation, which, like Arizona’s SB Angelica Rubio United States in recent years—inaccurate, in- 1070, essentially legalizes racial profiling against is a freelance 5 writer and blogger at complete, and insufficient.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nativist Lobby Three Faces of Intolerance
    The Nativist Lobby Three Faces of Intolerance A Report from the Southern Poverty Law Center Montgomery, Alabama February 2009 The Nativist Lobby Three Faces of Intolerance By Heidi BeiricH • edited By Mark Potok the southern poverty law center is a nonprofit organization that combats hate, intolerance and discrimination through education and litigation. Its Intelligence Project, which prepared this report and also produces the quarterly investigative magazine Intelligence Report, tracks the activities of hate groups and the nativist movement and monitors militia and other extremist anti- government activity. Its Teaching Tolerance project helps foster respect and understanding in the classroom. Its litigation arm files lawsuits against hate groups for the violent acts of their members. MEDIA AND GENERAL INQUIRIES Mark Potok, Editor Heidi Beirich Southern Poverty Law Center 400 Washington Ave., Montgomery, Ala. (334) 956-8200 www.splcenter.org • www.intelligencereport.org • www.splcenter.org/blog This report was prepared by the staff of the Intelligence Project of the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Center is supported entirely by private donations. No government funds are involved. © Southern Poverty Law Center. All rights reserved. southern poverty law center Table of Contents Preface 4 The Puppeteer: John Tanton and the Nativist Movement 5 FAIR: The Lobby’s Action Arm 9 CIS: The Lobby’s ‘Independent’ Think Tank 13 NumbersUSA: The Lobby’s Grassroots Organizer 18 southern poverty law center Editor’s Note By Mark Potok Three Washington, D.C.-based immigration-restriction organizations stand at the nexus of the American nativist movement: the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), and NumbersUSA.
    [Show full text]
  • Tour Itinerary/Discussion Questions Introduction
    STUDENT HANDOUT: TOUR ITINERARY/DISCUSSION QUESTIONS Directions: As you reach each stop on the Inside CNN Tour, try to complete the tasks and answer the questions on this sheet. INTRODUCTION THEATER: Learn about the evolution of a news story from interviews in the field, to satellites far beyond Earth’s atmosphere, to newsrooms and then to televisions and mobile devices everywhere. As you watch the video, track the steps a story takes before you see it in your living room. Identify any terms with which you are unfamiliar. Consider what technologies are used in CNN broadcasts. BIRTH OF CNN: Take a trip back through the evolution of journalism, from cave paintings to the Gutenberg Printing Press to the birth of CNN. As you walk through the hallway to the studio overlook, note the timeline on the evolution of journalism. Consider how each advance in technology and know-how impacted how people at the time learned about their world. When did Ted Turner launch CNN? Why do you think that this announcement was considered so groundbreaking at the time? STUDIO OVERLOOK: Modern studios provide the setting for much of CNN’s acclaimed programming. Learn about the planning and construction of the studios and all of the technical equipment and components used to broadcast news each day. Based on what you see in the time-lapsed video, what goes into putting together a production such as Lou Dobbs Tonight? Look at the timeline along the wall. What are some of the events that CNN has covered since its 1980 launch? How might CNN’s coverage have impacted an event or the course of the event? TELEPROMPTER/CHROMA-KEY: Advances in computer technology have become a vital tool for the modern news network.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 -- the Cable News Wars: Another Approach to Popularizing Commercial News
    Chapter 4 -- The Cable News Wars: Another Approach to Popularizing Commercial News The recession that began in 2008 has spurred or accelerated very significant, perhaps crippling, economic troubles in most sectors of the news industry. According to the Pew Center‟s annual State of the News Media report, most major commercial news formats, including local television news broadcasts, network news divisions, news magazines, and especially daily newspapers, experienced declining revenues in 2008 and 2009.1 Media companies also made steep divestures in the newsroom budgets in these news formats. Many analysts suspect these retrenchments are not only the effects of the financial downturn generally; rather, the core business models that have supported commercial journalism appear to be faltering in a media environment undergoing fundamental transformation in the digital age. Yet, one kind of commercial news outlet that did not face declining revenues in the midst of recession: cable news stations. Cable news is a puzzling genre in many respects. It straddles a line between a “traditional” news format and something new. Given that much discussion about the future of news pivots on a distinction between traditional news models and new media emerging in a landscape reshaped by digital and social media, where does cable news fit? Is it a harbinger of things to come or a last gasp of an increasingly obsolete news model trying to find relevance? Like most of the traditional news outlets, the most popular cable news stations are all owned by major media conglomerates, rely on professional journalists for most of their newsgathering (if not their commentary), and, at least for now, the majority of their programming embraces some 1 Pew Project on Excellence in Journalism, The State of the News Media (Washington, D.C.: Project for Excellence in Journalism, 2009), http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2009/index.htm; Pew Project on Excellence in Journalism, The State of the News Media (Washington, D.C.: Project for Excellence in Journalism, 2010), http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2010/.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday, January 26, Prime-Time: Broadcast Channels 7:30 Pm 8:00
    Tuesday, January 26, Prime-time: Broadcast Channels 7:30 pm 8:00 pm 8:30 pm 9:00 pm 9:30 pm 10:00 pm 10:30 pm 11:00 pm 11:30 pm CBS Entertainment NCIS (TV14) Following a tip FBI (TV14) The team searches FBI: Most Wanted (TV14) A militia News Å The Late Show: Tonight Re- about smuggled weapons, for a young girl who was kid- group opens fire on teenagers Stephen Colbert membering Bishop and Torres engage in a napped from a cabin during crossing the Canadian border (TVPG) Colin Kobe Bryant; shootout in a former sheriff’s a family vacation; Maggie into the U.S., the team races Firth; Stanley Wendy Wil- residence that’s now a histor- questions her relationship with to find the ringleader and his Tucci; Adri- liams. (N) Å ical site, only to find them- Nestor when she learns he target; Jess’ relationship with anne Lenker selves locked in abandoned jail hasn’t been completely honest his father reaches a breaking performs. (N) cells there. (N) Å with her. (N) Å point. (N) Å (11:35) Å NBC All Access Zoey’s Extraordinary Playlist This Is Us (TV14) The Pearsons Nurses (TVPG) Naz realizes News Å The Tonight (TVPG) (N) Å (TV14) Zoey tries to choose gather to celebrate their 40th her patient has a more serious Show: Jimmy happiness but finds it is easier birthday while musing about condition than anyone thought; Fallon (TV14) said than done; David reevalu- the day they were born. (Part Naz forms a special bond Susan Saran- ates his priorities; Mo and Max 1 of 2) Å with the patient’s cousin; Wolf don; JJ Watt.
    [Show full text]
  • History Early History
    Cable News Network, almost always referred to by its initialism CNN, is a U.S. cable newsnetwork founded in 1980 by Ted Turner.[1][2] Upon its launch, CNN was the first network to provide 24-hour television news coverage,[3] and the first all-news television network in the United States.[4]While the news network has numerous affiliates, CNN primarily broadcasts from its headquarters at the CNN Center in Atlanta, the Time Warner Center in New York City, and studios in Washington, D.C. and Los Angeles. CNN is owned by parent company Time Warner, and the U.S. news network is a division of the Turner Broadcasting System.[5] CNN is sometimes referred to as CNN/U.S. to distinguish the North American channel from its international counterpart, CNN International. As of June 2008, CNN is available in over 93 million U.S. households.[6] Broadcast coverage extends to over 890,000 American hotel rooms,[6] and the U.S broadcast is also shown in Canada. Globally, CNN programming airs through CNN International, which can be seen by viewers in over 212 countries and territories.[7] In terms of regular viewers (Nielsen ratings), CNN rates as the United States' number two cable news network and has the most unique viewers (Nielsen Cume Ratings).[8] History Early history CNN's first broadcast with David Walkerand Lois Hart on June 1, 1980. Main article: History of CNN: 1980-2003 The Cable News Network was launched at 5:00 p.m. EST on Sunday June 1, 1980. After an introduction by Ted Turner, the husband and wife team of David Walker and Lois Hart anchored the first newscast.[9] Since its debut, CNN has expanded its reach to a number of cable and satellite television networks, several web sites, specialized closed-circuit networks (such as CNN Airport Network), and a radio network.
    [Show full text]