DOCSLIB.ORG

Foreign Agents Registration Act 2Nd Half Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Foreign Agents Registration Act 2Nd Half Report U.S. Department of Justice . Washington, D.C. 20530 Report of the Attorney General to the Congress of the United States on the Administration of the . Foreign Agents Registration Act . of 1938, as amended, for the six months ending December 31, 2006 Report of the Attorney General to the Congress of the United States on the Administration of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, for the six months ending December 31, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................... 1-1 AFGHANISTAN......................................................1 ALGERIA..........................................................2 ANGOLA...........................................................3 ARMENIA..........................................................4 ARUBA............................................................5 AUSTRALIA........................................................6 AUSTRIA..........................................................8 AZERBAIJAN.......................................................9 BAHAMAS..........................................................10 BAHRAIN..........................................................11 BANGLADESH.......................................................12 BARBADOS.........................................................13 BELGIUM..........................................................15 BELIZE...........................................................16 BERMUDA..........................................................17 BOLIVIA..........................................................18 BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA...............................................19 BRAZIL...........................................................20 BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS...........................................21 BURUNDI..........................................................22 CAMEROON.........................................................23 CANADA...........................................................24 CAYMAN ISLANDS...................................................32 CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC.........................................33 CHILE............................................................34 CHINA............................................................35 COLOMBIA.........................................................40 CONGO (BRAZZAVILLE)..............................................42 CONGO (KINSHASA) (ZAIRE).........................................43 COSTA RICA.......................................................44 COTE D'IVOIRE (IVORY COAST)......................................45 CROATIA..........................................................46 CYPRUS...........................................................47 CZECH REPUBLIC...................................................50 DENMARK..........................................................51 DJIBOUTI.........................................................53 DOMINICA.........................................................54 DOMINICAN REPUBLIC...............................................55 ECUADOR..........................................................56 EGYPT............................................................57 EL SALVADOR......................................................58 EQUATORIAL GUINEA................................................59 ERITREA..........................................................60 ETHIOPIA.........................................................61 FINLAND..........................................................63 FRANCE...........................................................64 GABON............................................................66 GEORGIA..........................................................67 GERMANY..........................................................68 GHANA............................................................70 GREAT BRITAIN....................................................71 GREECE...........................................................78 GRENADA..........................................................79 GUATEMALA........................................................80 GUYANA...........................................................81 HONDURAS.........................................................82 HONG KONG........................................................83 ICELAND..........................................................86 INDIA............................................................87 INDONESIA........................................................90 INTERNATIONAL....................................................91 IRAN.............................................................94 IRAQ.............................................................95 IRELAND..........................................................98 ISLE OF MAN......................................................100 ISRAEL...........................................................101 ITALY............................................................103 JAMAICA..........................................................105 JAPAN............................................................106 JORDAN...........................................................121 KOREA, DEMOCRATIC PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF............................122 KOREA, REPUBLIC OF...............................................123 KOSOVA...........................................................131 KUWAIT...........................................................132 LAOS.............................................................134 LEBANON..........................................................135 LESOTHO..........................................................136 LIBERIA..........................................................137 LIBYA............................................................138 LUXEMBOURG.......................................................139 MACAU............................................................140 MACEDONIA........................................................141 MALAYSIA.........................................................142 MALDIVES.........................................................144 MALTA............................................................145 MARSHALL ISLANDS.................................................146 MAURITANIA.......................................................147 MAURITIUS........................................................148 MEXICO...........................................................149 MICRONESIA.......................................................153 MONACO...........................................................154 MONTENEGRO.......................................................155 MOROCCO..........................................................156 NAGORNO KARABAGH.................................................158 NAURU............................................................159 NEPAL............................................................160 NETHERLANDS......................................................161 NEW ZEALAND......................................................162 NICARAGUA........................................................163 NIGERIA..........................................................164 NORTHERN IRELAND.................................................167 NORWAY...........................................................168 OMAN.............................................................169 PAKISTAN.........................................................170 PALESTINE........................................................172 PANAMA...........................................................173 PERU.............................................................176 PHILIPPINES......................................................178 POLAND...........................................................180 PORTUGAL.........................................................181 QATAR............................................................182 ROMANIA..........................................................183 RUSSIA...........................................................185 RWANDA...........................................................188 SAN MARINO.......................................................189 SAUDI ARABIA.....................................................190 SCOTLAND.........................................................197 SENEGAL..........................................................198 SERBIA...........................................................199 SIERRA LEONE.....................................................200 SINGAPORE........................................................201 SLOVAKIA.........................................................203 SOMALI DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC.......................................204 SOUTH AFRICA.....................................................205 SPAIN............................................................206 ST. LUCIA........................................................207 ST. MARTIN.......................................................208 SUDAN............................................................209 SWAZILAND........................................................210 SWEDEN...........................................................211 SWITZERLAND......................................................212 TAIWAN...........................................................215 TANZANIA.........................................................222
Load more

Recommended publications
  • No. 20-17132 in the UNITED STATES COURT of APPEALS
    Case: 20-17132, 11/20/2020, ID: 11901254, DktEntry: 22-6, Page 1 of 63 No. 20-17132 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. 4:20-cv-4887-JSW The Hon. James S. White DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS’ EXCERPTS OF RECORD Volume 6 of 6 ER 958–1018 JEFFREY BOSSERT CLARK JOSHUA S. PRESS Acting Assistant Attorney General Trial Attorney WILLIAM C. PEACHEY United States Department of Justice Civil Division, Director Office of Immigration Litigation MATTHEW J. GLOVER District Court Section Senior Counsel to the Assistant P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Attorney General Washington, DC 20044 GLENN M. GIRDHARRY Phone: (202) 305-0106 Assistant Director Fax: (202) 305-7000 e-Mail: [email protected] AARON S. GOLDSMITH Senior Litigation Counsel Attorneys for Defendants-Appellants Case: 20-17132, 11/20/2020, ID: 11901254, DktEntry: 22-6, Page 2 of 63 TABLE OF CONTENTS ECF DATE DESCRIPTION PAGES No. 1 07/21/2020 Complaint ER 0958 11/13/2020 District Court Docket Sheet ER 1001 Case:Case 20-17132, 3:20-cv-04887 11/20/2020, Document ID: 11901254, 1 Filed DktEntry: 07/21/20 22-6, Page Page 1 of 343 of 63 1 MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP Paul W. Hughes (Pro Hac Vice to be filed) 2 [email protected] Michael B. Kimberly (Pro Hac Vice to be filed) 3 [email protected] 500 North Capitol Street NW 4 Washington, DC 20001 5 (202) 756-8000 6 MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP William G.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding African Armies
    REPORT Nº 27 — April 2016 Understanding African armies RAPPORTEURS David Chuter Florence Gaub WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM Taynja Abdel Baghy, Aline Leboeuf, José Luengo-Cabrera, Jérôme Spinoza Reports European Union Institute for Security Studies EU Institute for Security Studies 100, avenue de Suffren 75015 Paris http://www.iss.europa.eu Director: Antonio Missiroli © EU Institute for Security Studies, 2016. Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, save where otherwise stated. Print ISBN 978-92-9198-482-4 ISSN 1830-9747 doi:10.2815/97283 QN-AF-16-003-EN-C PDF ISBN 978-92-9198-483-1 ISSN 2363-264X doi:10.2815/088701 QN-AF-16-003-EN-N Published by the EU Institute for Security Studies and printed in France by Jouve. Graphic design by Metropolis, Lisbon. Maps: Léonie Schlosser; António Dias (Metropolis). Cover photograph: Kenyan army soldier Nicholas Munyanya. Credit: Ben Curtis/AP/SIPA CONTENTS Foreword 5 Antonio Missiroli I. Introduction: history and origins 9 II. The business of war: capacities and conflicts 15 III. The business of politics: coups and people 25 IV. Current and future challenges 37 V. Food for thought 41 Annexes 45 Tables 46 List of references 65 Abbreviations 69 Notes on the contributors 71 ISSReportNo.27 List of maps Figure 1: Peace missions in Africa 8 Figure 2: Independence of African States 11 Figure 3: Overview of countries and their armed forces 14 Figure 4: A history of external influences in Africa 17 Figure 5: Armed conflicts involving African armies 20 Figure 6: Global peace index 22 Figure
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Eye, Summer 2010
    Right-Wing Co-Opts Civil Rights Movement History, p. 3 TheA PUBLICATION OF POLITICAL R PublicEyeESEARCH ASSOCIATES Summer 2010 • Volume XXV, No.2 Basta Dobbs! Last year, a coalition of Latino/a groups suc - cessfully fought to remove anti-immigrant pundit Lou Dobbs from CNN. Political Research Associates Executive DirectorTarso Luís Ramos spoke to Presente.org co-founder Roberto Lovato to find out how they did it. Tarso Luís Ramos: Tell me about your organization, Presente.org. Roberto Lovato: Presente.org, founded in MaY 2009, is the preeminent online Latino adVocacY organiZation. It’s kind of like a MoVeOn.org for Latinos: its goal is to build Latino poWer through online and offline organiZing. Presente started With a campaign to persuade GoVernor EdWard Rendell of PennsYlVania to take a stand against the Verdict in the case of Luis RamíreZ, an undocumented immigrant t t e Who Was killed in Shenandoah, PennsYl - k n u l Vania, and Whose assailants Were acquitted P k c a J bY an all-White jurY. We also ran a campaign / o t o to support the nomination of Sonia h P P SotomaYor to the Supreme Court—We A Students rally at a State Board of Education meeting, Austin, Texas, March 10, 2010 produced an “I Stand With SotomaYor” logo and poster that people could displaY at Work or in their neighborhoods and post on their Facebook pages—and a feW addi - From Schoolhouse to Statehouse tional, smaller campaigns, but reallY the Curriculum from a Christian Nationalist Worldview Basta Dobbs! continues on page 12 By Rachel Tabachnick TheTexas Curriculum IN THIS ISSUE Controversy objectiVe is present—a Christian land goV - 1 Editorial .
    [Show full text]
  • The Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense: an Assessment
    DEFENSE BUSINESS BOARD Submitted to the Secretary of Defense The Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense: An Assessment DBB FY 20-01 An assessment of the effectiveness, responsibilities, and authorities of the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense as required by §904 of the FY20 NDAA June 1, 2020 DBB FY20-01 CMO Assessment 1 Executive Summary Tasking and Task Force: The Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) (Public Law (Pub. L. 116-92) required the Secretary of Defense (SD) to conduct an independent assessment of the Chief Management Officer (CMO) with six specific areas to be evaluated. The Defense Business Board (DBB) was selected on February 3, 2020 to conduct the independent assessment, with Arnold Punaro and Atul Vashistha assigned to co-chair the effort. Two additional DBB board members comprised the task force: David Walker and David Van Slyke. These individuals more than meet the independence and competencies required by the NDAA. Approach: The DBB task force focused on the CMO office and the Department of Defense (DoD) business transformation activities since 2008 when the office was first established by the Congress as the Deputy Chief Management Officer (DCMO), and in 2018 when the Congress increased its statutory authority and elevated it to Executive Level (EX) II and the third ranking official in DoD. The taskforce reviewed all previous studies of DoD management and organizations going back twenty years and completed over ninety interviews, including current and former DoD, public and private sector leaders. The assessments of CMO effectiveness since 2008 are focused on the performance of the CMO as an organizational entity, and is not an appraisal of any administration or appointee.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Broken Borders' and Stone Walls
    Talk of ‘Broken Borders’ and Stone Walls 21 Talk of ‘Broken Borders’ and Stone Walls: Anti-immigrant Discourse and Legislation from California to South Carolina Ann Kingsolver University of South Carolina The anti-immigrant sentiments that propelled the passage of California Proposition 187 in 1994 – linked to an economic downturn and worries about NAFTA – have been echoed across the U.S. over the intervening sixteen years. This article briefly reviews public discourse about anti-immigrant legislation in a wave of other states from California to South Carolina, and discusses the convergence of anti- immigrant and white supremacist projects in the U.S., using the concepts of market citizenship and citizen surveillance. As new anti-immigrant legislation is proposed in the South, understanding it within its national and historical context is important. This discussion includes consideration of the role of metaphor in both fueling and countering anti-immigrant discourse. Anti-immigrant discourse: ‘broken’ borders and stone walls Legislation that may be worded in terms of protecting U.S. or state citizens but be referred to in public discourse as anti-immigration or anti-immigrant legislation has been making its way through statehouses across the U.S. over the past decade and a half. This is the latest round of legislation blaming recent immigrants (often from a specific nation or set of nations) for economic hardship or criminal activity in the U.S., which is portrayed as possible to alleviate with the removal or barring of undocumented or “illegal immigrants.” The research question taken up here is: what larger discursive projects (e.g., racializing projects, cf.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anglophone Cameroon Crisis: by Jon Lunn and Louisa Brooke-Holland April 2019 Update
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 8331, 17 April 2019 The Anglophone Cameroon crisis: By Jon Lunn and Louisa April 2019 update Brooke-Holland Contents: 1. Overview 2. History and its legacies 3. 2015-17: main developments 4. 2018: main developments 5. Events during 2019 and future prospects 6. Response of Western governments and the UN www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 The Anglophone Cameroon crisis: April 2019 update Contents Summary 3 1. History and its legacies 5 2. 2015-17: main developments 8 3. 2018: main developments 10 4. Events during 2019 and future prospects 12 5. Response of Western governments and the UN 13 Cover page image copyright: Image 5584098178_709d889580_o – Welcome signs to Santa, gateway to the anglophone Northwest Region, Cameroon, March 2011 by Joel Abroad – Flickr.com page. Licensed by Attribution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)/ image cropped. 3 Commons Library Briefing, 17 April 2019 Summary Relations between the two Anglophone regions of Cameroon and the country’s dominant Francophone elite have long been fraught. Over the past three years, tensions have escalated seriously and since October 2017 violent conflict has erupted between armed separatist groups and the security forces, with both sides being accused of committing human rights abuses. The tensions originate in a complex and contested decolonisation process in the late-1950s and early-1960s, in which Britain, as one of the colonial powers, was heavily involved. Federal arrangements were scrapped in 1972 by a Francophone- dominated central government. Many English-speaking Cameroonians have long complained that they are politically, economically and linguistically marginalised.
    [Show full text]
  • Troubled Neighbor Mexico’S Drug Violence Poses a Threat to the United States by Ted Galen Carpenter
    3597_PA631_1stClass:3597_PA631_1stClass 1/15/2009 9:43 AM Page 1 No. 631 February 2, 2009 Troubled Neighbor Mexico’s Drug Violence Poses a Threat to the United States by Ted Galen Carpenter Executive Summary While U.S. leaders have focused on actual or oughly corrupted by drug money. Washington has illusory security threats in distant regions, there is rewarded Calderón’s government by implement- a troubling security problem brewing much closer ing the initial stage of the so-called Mérida to home. Violence in Mexico, mostly related to the Initiative. In June 2008, Congress approved a $400 trade in illegal drugs, has risen sharply in recent million installment modeled on Plan Colombia, years and shows signs of becoming even worse. the anti-drug assistance measure for Colombia That violence involves turf fights among the vari- and other drug-source countries in the Andean ous drug-trafficking organizations as they seek to region. That program, now in its ninth year, has control access to the lucrative U.S. market. To an already cost more than $5 billion, without signifi- increasing extent, the violence also entails fighting cantly reducing the flow of drugs coming out of between drug traffickers and Mexican military South America. The Mérida Initiative will likely and police forces. cost billions and be equally ineffectual. The carnage has already reached the point that Abandoning the prohibitionist model of deal- the U.S. State Department has issued travel alerts ing with the drug problem is the only effective way for Americans traveling in Mexico. U.S. tourism to to stem the violence in Mexico and its spillover cities on Mexico’s border with the United States, into the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Travel Risk Summaries
    COUNTRY RISK SUMMARIES Powered by FocusPoint International, Inc. Report for Week Ending September 19, 2021 Latest Updates: Afghanistan, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, India, Israel, Mali, Mexico, Myanmar, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Turkey, Ukraine and Yemen. ▪ Afghanistan: On September 14, thousands held a protest in Kandahar during afternoon hours local time to denounce a Taliban decision to evict residents in Firqa area. No further details were immediately available. ▪ Burkina Faso: On September 13, at least four people were killed and several others ijured after suspected Islamist militants ambushed a gendarme patrol escorting mining workers between Sakoani and Matiacoali in Est Region. Several gendarmes were missing following the attack. ▪ Cameroon: On September 14, at least seven soldiers were killed in clashes with separatist fighters in kikaikelaki, Northwest region. Another two soldiers were killed in an ambush in Chounghi on September 11. ▪ India: On September 16, at least six people were killed, including one each in Kendrapara and Subarnapur districts, and around 20,522 others evacuated, while 7,500 houses were damaged across Odisha state over the last three days, due to floods triggered by heavy rainfall. Disaster teams were sent to Balasore, Bhadrak and Kendrapara districts. Further floods were expected along the Mahanadi River and its tributaries. ▪ Israel: On September 13, at least two people were injured after being stabbed near Jerusalem Central Bus Station during afternoon hours local time. No further details were immediately available, but the assailant was shot dead by security forces. ▪ Mali: On September 13, at least five government soldiers and three Islamist militants were killed in clashes near Manidje in Kolongo commune, Macina cercle, Segou region, during morning hours local time.
    [Show full text]
  • SPANISH FORK PAGES 1-20.Indd
    November 14 - 20, 2008 SPANISH FORK CABLE GUIDE 9 Friday Prime Time, November 14 4 P.M. 4:30 5 P.M. 5:30 6 P.M. 6:30 7 P.M. 7:30 8 P.M. 8:30 9 P.M. 9:30 10 P.M. 10:30 11 P.M. 11:30 BASIC CABLE Oprah Winfrey b News (N) b CBS Evening News (N) b Entertainment Ghost Whisperer “Threshold” The Price Is Right Salutes the NUMB3RS “Charlie Don’t Surf” News (N) b (10:35) Late Show With David Late Late Show KUTV 2 News-Couric Tonight (N) b Troops (N) b (N) b Letterman (N) KJZZ 3 High School Football The Insider Frasier Friends Friends Fortune Jeopardy! Dr. Phil b News (N) Sports News Scrubs Scrubs Entertain The Insider The Ellen DeGeneres Show Ac- News (N) World News- News (N) Access Holly- Supernanny “Howat Family” (N) Super-Manny (N) b 20/20 b News (N) (10:35) Night- Access Holly- (11:36) Extra KTVX 4 tor Nathan Lane. (N) Gibson wood (N) b line (N) wood (N) (N) b News (N) b News (N) b News (N) b NBC Nightly News (N) b News (N) b Deal or No Deal A teacher returns Crusoe “Hour 6 -- Long Pig” (N) Lipstick Jungle (N) b News (N) b (10:35) The Tonight Show With Late Night KSL 5 News (N) to finish her game. b Jay Leno (N) b TBS 6 Raymond Friends Seinfeld Seinfeld ‘The Wizard of Oz’ (G, ’39) Judy Garland. (8:10) ‘Shrek’ (’01) Voices of Mike Myers.
    [Show full text]
  • “These Killings Can Be Stopped” RIGHTS Government and Separatist Groups Abuses in Cameroon’S WATCH Anglophone Regions
    HUMAN “These Killings Can Be Stopped” RIGHTS Government and Separatist Groups Abuses in Cameroon’s WATCH Anglophone Regions “These Killings Can Be Stopped” Abuses by Government and Separatist Groups in Cameroon’s Anglophone Regions Copyright © 2018 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-36352 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org JULY 2018 ISBN: 978-1-6231-36352 “These Killings Can Be Stopped” Abuses by Government and Separatist Groups in Cameroon’s Anglophone Regions Map .................................................................................................................................... i Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Undocumented, Not Illegal: Beyond the Rhetoric of Immigration Coverage
    NACLA REPORT ON THE AMERICAS mala MEDIA ACCURACY mala ON LATIN AMERICA www.nacla.org/mala Undocumented, Not Illegal: Beyond the Rhetoric of Immigration Coverage By Angelica Rubio N JUNE , PULITZER PRIZE WINNER JOSE ANTONIO VAR - the country. According to a 2008 report by the gas came out as an undocumented person. Southern Poverty Law Center, the number of hate I Many advocates were inspired by his story groups rose from 602 in 2000 to 888 in 2007—a because it put a face on the millions of undocu- 48% increase. In 2007, the SPLC added the mented immigrants living in the shadows of U.S. 250,000-member Federation for American Immi- society. Unfortunately, rather than participate in gration Reform (FAIR) to its “list of hate group” for the discussion, the mainstream media ignited a the organization’s baseless anti-immigrant “theories, firestorm. As Colorlines’s Mónica Novoa carefully coupled with a history of ties to white supremacist explained the following day, Vargas’s story drew groups.”3 FAIR is largely funded by wealthy racists, “enormous media attention and drove ‘undocu- such as John Tanton, who also helped to found the mented immigrant’ up to a top-trending term on Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), and Numbers Twitter. But it’s a shame that in the dissection USA, creating a veritable anti- immigrant empire in and retelling of his story, a fine point has been the mid-1990s. According to The New York Times lost on many of Vargas’ colleagues: He came out these groups were influential in the congressional specifically as an undocumented immigrant and defeat of the Dream Act in 2010, and the drafting not as ‘illegal.’ ”1 of Arizona’s notorious SB 1070 legislation.4 State The Vargas story is a telling example of the legislatures in Alabama and Georgia have followed media coverage of the immigration debate in the suite, passing legislation, which, like Arizona’s SB Angelica Rubio United States in recent years—inaccurate, in- 1070, essentially legalizes racial profiling against is a freelance 5 writer and blogger at complete, and insufficient.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nativist Lobby Three Faces of Intolerance
    The Nativist Lobby Three Faces of Intolerance A Report from the Southern Poverty Law Center Montgomery, Alabama February 2009 The Nativist Lobby Three Faces of Intolerance By Heidi BeiricH • edited By Mark Potok the southern poverty law center is a nonprofit organization that combats hate, intolerance and discrimination through education and litigation. Its Intelligence Project, which prepared this report and also produces the quarterly investigative magazine Intelligence Report, tracks the activities of hate groups and the nativist movement and monitors militia and other extremist anti- government activity. Its Teaching Tolerance project helps foster respect and understanding in the classroom. Its litigation arm files lawsuits against hate groups for the violent acts of their members. MEDIA AND GENERAL INQUIRIES Mark Potok, Editor Heidi Beirich Southern Poverty Law Center 400 Washington Ave., Montgomery, Ala. (334) 956-8200 www.splcenter.org • www.intelligencereport.org • www.splcenter.org/blog This report was prepared by the staff of the Intelligence Project of the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Center is supported entirely by private donations. No government funds are involved. © Southern Poverty Law Center. All rights reserved. southern poverty law center Table of Contents Preface 4 The Puppeteer: John Tanton and the Nativist Movement 5 FAIR: The Lobby’s Action Arm 9 CIS: The Lobby’s ‘Independent’ Think Tank 13 NumbersUSA: The Lobby’s Grassroots Organizer 18 southern poverty law center Editor’s Note By Mark Potok Three Washington, D.C.-based immigration-restriction organizations stand at the nexus of the American nativist movement: the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), and NumbersUSA.
    [Show full text]