REAL ESTATE MARKET INSIGHTS August 2017 the PHILIPPINES the Philippines
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Balesin Island Club
BALESIN ISLAND CLUB It’s easy to say nice things about yourself, but what matters is what others say about you. Here is what others have said about Balesin. July/August 2010 Balesin beckons oberto Ongpin waxes lyrical when Balesin presents that interesting involves initially the development of R he talks about Balesin, a 500- hectare opportunity and he is determined to six themed villages based on Ongpin’s white-sand island off the coast of make it a stand-out. Ongpin reckons own travels – Mykonos (Greece), Quezon province on the Philippines’ that if he did not enter the world of Sardinia (Italy), St. Tropez (France), Pacific coast. Alphaland, the listed company business, he would probably have been Phuket (Thailand), Bali (Indonesia) Ongpin runs with investment from UK- an architect. “There were 11 architects and a still unnamed Philippine island based Ashmore group, had acquired the involved in the development of the initial theme. Each village will have 20 to property recently from the family of phase of Tagaytay Highlands; one of 30 units. Work has started on a new the late Edgardo Tordesillas, who was them is unlicensed,” he chuckles. He runway. Alphaland will be acquiring Ongpin’s deputy at the trade and industry says that some of the greatest battles small aircrafts for the 25-minute hop ministry when both of them were in he had then was often over design – the to ferry vacationers to the island. By government in the 1980s. Part of Ongpin’s look and feel. He believes in building to the end of the year, Ongpin hopes excitement is explained by the fact that cater to the high end of the market – to to have the clubhouse up and running. -
23 JANUARY 2021, SATURDAY ✓ Headline STRATEGIC January 23, 2021 COMMUNICATION & Editorial Date INITIATIVES Column SERVICE 1 of 2 Opinion Page Feature Article
23 JANUARY 2021, SATURDAY ✓ Headline STRATEGIC January 23, 2021 COMMUNICATION & Editorial Date INITIATIVES Column SERVICE 1 of 2 Opinion Page Feature Article DENR magbibigay ng technical assistance sa Tawi-Tawi Tumbagaan Island mine rehab January 22, 2021 @ 7:01 PM 12 hours ago Manila, Philippines – Tiniyak ng Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) na handa itong magbigay ng tulong para sa rehabilitasyon ng mined-out site ng Tumbagaan island sa Tawi-Tawi sa naturang lalawigan na kinasasakupan ng Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM). Ayon kay Undersecretary for Enforcement, Mining and Muslim Affairs Jim O. Sampulna kahit na ang Tawi-Tawi ay hindi nasa ilalim ng hurisdiksyon ng DENR’s ang ahensya ay nakahandang tumulong sa BARMM’s Ministry of Environment Natural Resources, and Energy (MENRE) para sa kanilang environment inisyatiba. Sinabi pa ni Sampulna na inatasan siya ni DENR Secretary Roy A. Cimatu na maghanda sakaling ang BARMM government ay hihingi ng tulong. “If they will seek technical assistance, we are willing to extend expertise, not just in mining but in all other aspects that BARMM needs such as in lands, forestry, biodiversity, and environment,” ani Sampulna. Nilinaw pa ni Sampulna na ang DENR ay walang awtoridad para magsagawa ng mining operation sa Tawi-Tawi kasunod ng panawagan ng publiko sa DENR na umaksyon sa kautusan ni President Rodrigo Roa Duterte para sa agarang pagpapahinto ng mining activities sa Tambagaan island. “However, the DENR fully supports the order of the President to suspend the mining operations in the said area for its rehabilitation.” “BARMM is now conducting an investigation on the site to fast track the rehabilitation,” sinabi pa ni Sampulna. -
Power Sector Assets and Liabilities Management (PSALM) Corporation
PES Form 4 1st Quarter Monitoring Report Power Sector Assets and Liabilities Management (PSALM) Corporation Accomplishments Component Board-approved 1/ (as of 31 March 2021) Strategic Objective (SO)/ Rating Formula Weight % Annual Target Actual Strategic Measure(SM) System SO 1: Reduced financial obligations (FO) SM 1 Amount of Net Reduction in FO 30.0 Actual over PHP24.630 Billion 퐹푂푝푟푒푣푖표푢푠 − 퐹푂푐푢푟푟푒푛푡 푦푒푎푟 푦푒푎푟 Target (Reduction from PHP411.827 Billion to PHP387.197 Billion) Forex Used: 2019 Year-end rate (PHP50.744 = US$1) PHP23.004 Billion not yet available (Restated) (Reduction from PHP381.72 Billion to PHP358.72 Billion) Forex Used: 2020 Year-end rate (PHP48.036 = US$1) SO 2: Ensured strong financial performance SM 2 Collection Efficiency for Current 퐶표푙푙푒푐푡표푛푠 푓푟표푚 10.0 Actual over 93% not yet available Power Sales 퐶푢푟푟푒푛푡 푃표푤푒푟 푆푎푙푒푠 Target 퐶푢푟푟푒푛푡 푃표푤푒푟 푆푎푙푒푠 92% (Revised target per letter to GCG dated 18 Dec. 2020) SM 3 Amount of Delinquent/ Overdue 5.0 Actual over PHP0.951 Billion not yet available Accounts Collected Σ 퐴푐푡푢푎푙 퐶표푙푙푒푐푡표푛 Target ⬚ PHP0.359 Billion (Revised target per letter to GCG dated 18 Dec. 2020) SM 4 Percentage Share of Overhead 푃푆 + 푀푂푂퐸 − 퐵푎푑 퐷푒푏푡푠 5.0 Actual over 11.15% not yet available Expenses to Total Income 푇표푡푎푙 퐼푛푐표푚푒 Target PHP1.307 Billion PHP11.727 Billion PerspectiveFinancial 1: Actual over 2/ SM 5 EBITDA Margin of Operating 퐸퐵퐼푇퐷퐴 표푓 푂푝푒푟푎푡푛푔 5.0 5.85% not yet available Power Assets 푃표푤푒푟 퐴푠푠푒푡푠 Target PHP1.846 Billion 푁푒푡 푈푡푙푡푦 푅푒푣푒푛푢푒 PHP31.554 Billion SM 6 Universal Charge (UC) Σ 푈퐶 퐴푐푡푢푎푙 -
Curriculum Vitae 1
BENJAMIN E. DIOKNO Specialization: Professor Diokno provides policy advice and conducts research in the following areas: public economics (with focus on structure and scope of government, tax policies and tax reform; government expenditure analysis; national budget, deficit and debt; and decentralization and intergovernmental fiscal relations), public expenditure management, resource economics (with focus on public policy on water and oil), and economic development (with focus on ASEAN transitional economies). I. ADDRESS AND DESIGNATION Home Address: 3 Purok Aguinaldo, University of the Philippines Campus Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines 1001 Telefax (632) 924-9177 Mobile +63 917 898 6090 Business Address: School of Economics, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines 1001 Tel. (632) 927-9686 to 92 Local 246 or 207 [email protected], [email protected] Present Position: Philippine National Bank Professor of Economics School of Economics, University of the Philippines (Diliman) II. PERSONAL BACKGROUND Date of Birth: March 31, 1948 Place of Birth: Taal, Batangas, Philippines Nationality: Filipino III. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND Highest Degree School Attended and Address of School Year Earned Graduated Ph.D. (Economics) Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, 1981 Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, U.S.A. M.A. Political Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A. 1976 Economy M.A. Economics U. of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines 1974 Certificate in University of the Philippines-University of Wisconsin 1972 Development Program in Development Program in Development Economics (With Economics, School of Economics, U. of the Philippines, Very High Diliman Distinction) Master of Public U. of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines 1970 Administration B.A. -
A Study on Dutertenomics: Drastic Policy Shift in PPP Infrastructure Development in the Philippines
投稿論文/Contributions A Study on Dutertenomics: Drastic Policy Shift in PPP Infrastructure Development in the Philippines Susumu ITO Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan Abstract This paper studies Dutertenomics of the Philippines which is regarded as drastic policy shift in PPP, Public-private partnership, infrastructure development. While Aquino administration focused on PPP-based infrastructure development as a priority policy, the Duterte administration launched "Dutertenomics", a large-scale infrastructure development plan of about 8 trillion pesos, about 160 billion USD, over 6 years in 2017 which mainly depends on national budget and ODA as financial source rather than PPP. This triggered debate of "PPP vs ODA" in the Philippines. The paper discusses PPP related policies and measures implemented by Aquino administration including government organization, project development fund, PPP fund and relaxation of single borrowers' limit. Dutertenomics will be discussed from the point of view of 1) acceleration of infrastructure development, 2) shift from PPP to ODA, 3) hybrid PPP and 4) financial sources. The paper also examines changes in infrastructure development and its policy in the three decades after Marcos administration since 1986 as a background of these policy shift. The paper discusses that the issue is not about the "PPP vs ODA" but how to promote complementary relations between the public sector and PPP; in other words “PPP and ODA”. Keyword: Public-private partnership, Infrastructure, Philippines Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................... -
1623400766-2020-Sec17a.Pdf
COVER SHEET 2 0 5 7 3 SEC Registration Number M E T R O P O L I T A N B A N K & T R U S T C O M P A N Y (Company’s Full Name) M e t r o b a n k P l a z a , S e n . G i l P u y a t A v e n u e , U r d a n e t a V i l l a g e , M a k a t i C i t y , M e t r o M a n i l a (Business Address: No. Street City/Town/Province) RENATO K. DE BORJA, JR. 8898-8805 (Contact Person) (Company Telephone Number) 1 2 3 1 1 7 - A 0 4 2 8 Month Day (Form Type) Month Day (Fiscal Year) (Annual Meeting) NONE (Secondary License Type, If Applicable) Corporation Finance Department Dept. Requiring this Doc. Amended Articles Number/Section Total Amount of Borrowings 2,999 as of 12-31-2020 Total No. of Stockholders Domestic Foreign To be accomplished by SEC Personnel concerned File Number LCU Document ID Cashier S T A M P S Remarks: Please use BLACK ink for scanning purposes. 2 SEC Number 20573 File Number______ METROPOLITAN BANK & TRUST COMPANY (Company’s Full Name) Metrobank Plaza, Sen. Gil Puyat Avenue, Urdaneta Village, Makati City, Metro Manila (Company’s Address) 8898-8805 (Telephone Number) December 31 (Fiscal year ending) FORM 17-A (ANNUAL REPORT) (Form Type) (Amendment Designation, if applicable) December 31, 2020 (Period Ended Date) None (Secondary License Type and File Number) 3 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SEC FORM 17-A ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE SECURITIES REGULATION CODE AND SECTION 141 OF CORPORATION CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES 1. -
Development Coordination
Malolos-Clark Railway Project (RRP PHI 52083) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION A. Major Development Partners: Strategic Foci and Key Activities 1. Major development partners in the Philippines transport sector are the Asian Development Bank (ADB), the Government of Australia, the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), the United Kingdom, and the World Bank (Table 1). The Republic of Korea (ROK) and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) have also supported the country with transport infrastructure. Before its 2008 merger with JICA, the Japan Bank for International Cooperation provided substantial support for the transport sector. The development partners are united in supporting the national spatial strategy of the Philippine Development Plan (PDP), 2017–2022.1 ADB focuses on supporting the road and rail subsectors, and plays a supporting role in addressing governance, institutional capacity, and the low productivity of transport agencies. In addition to supporting the road subsector, ADB has extended assistance, together with JICA, for rail subsector projects. In the rail subsector, ADB and JICA will cofinance a series of projects that will eventually create investment opportunities for other cofinanciers, including private sector investors. Table 1: Major Development Partners Development Partner Project Name Duration Amount (million) Rail Transport JICA Metro Rail Transit Line 3 Rehabilitation Project 2018–2021 ¥38,101.0 Metro Manila Subway Project (Phase 1) 2018–2025 ¥104,530.0 North–South -
4 Ka Rason Nganong Angayang Palagputon Si Duterte
4 ka rason nganong angayang palagputon si Duterte Kagawaran sa Impormasyon Partido Komunista ng Pilipinas Hulyo 2019 obra na ang tiranikong paghari ug terorismo ni Rodrigo Duterte. Dili moubos sa upat ang pinakadakung hinungdan kung nganong kinahanglan na siyang palag- puton sa pwesto. Bugtong sa pagpalagpot kaniya sa pwesto ug pagpanubag ka- Sniya sa iyang mga kalapasan ug krimen makatikang paabante ang katawhang Pilipino. Walay kaulaw ang pagluhod ni Duterte sa mga langyaw. Pakana lang ang iyang “inde- pendyenteng palisiyang panggawas.” Ang tinuod, nagpagamit siya sa duha ka dagkung ga- hum aron magpabilin sa poder ug palapdon ang interes sa pinakasuod kaniya. Siya ang nu- mero unong papet sa imperyalistang US ug bayaran sa China. Layong nalabwan na niya ang rekord sa kanhing diktaduryang Marcos ug kapareho ni- yang kawatan nga si Arroyo sa kadaghanon sa mga gipapatay sulod sa mubo nga panahon. Gigamit niya ang tibuok makinarya sa estado, gikan sa sangay sa ehekutibo hangtud lehis- latibo ug hudisyal, ingonman ang tibuok burukrasyang sibil ug militar, aron palanaton ang paghari sa iyang pundok ug makamonopolyo sa pinakadakung kapuslanan. Ilalum sa iyang paghari, nag-antus ang katawhan tungod sa kawad-on sa disenteng suhulan, trabaho ug panginabuhian, ingonman sa maayong serbisyong pangpubliko. Giga- mit lang niya ang lehitimong mga mulo ug pangayo sa katawhan aron ilusot ang makilang- yaw ug makikapitalistang mga pakana. Labaw pa niyang ginapuga ang pinakakabus nga Pi- lipino aron pondohan ang mga programang Build, Build, Build nga ginakurakot sa iyang pa- milya ug ginapahimuslan sa pinakaadunahang Pilipino. Si Duterte ang pinakagikasilagan nga dagway sa burukrata-kapitalismo sa kasamta- ngan. -
Current Status and Prospects of Protected Areas in the Light of the Philippine Biodiversity Conservation Priorities
Proceedings of IUCN/WCPA-EA-4 Taipei Conference March 18-23, 2002, Taipei, Taiwan CURRENT STATUS AND PROSPECTS OF PROTECTED AREAS IN THE LIGHT OF THE PHILIPPINE BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION PRIORITIES Perry S. Ong, Ph. D. Fellow, Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, CI Science Director, Conservation International Philippines Associate Professor, Institute of Biology, UP Diliman I. INTRODUCTION The Philippines, the world’s second largest archipelago after Indonesia, covers a land area of about 300,000 km2 [1]. It is one of the 17 megadiversity countries, which between themselves contain 70 to 80 percent of global biodiversity [2]. Philippine rainforest is home to more than 1130 terrestrial wildlife species (Table 1) and between 10,000-13,000 species of plants [3] so far recorded, of which more than half are found nowhere else in the world. As such, the Philippines has also been described as Galapagos times ten [4]. It is also one of 25 global biodiversity hotspots [5, 6] with more than 97 percent of its original forest cover lost [7, 8]. In fact more original forests were lost in the last 50 years of the 20th century than what was lost in the previous 450 years combined [9]. Yet more new species are still being discovered on these islands than any other areas on earth in recent times [e.g., see 10, 11] Table 1. Diversity, endemism and conservation status of Philippine wildlife [11, 12, 13 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20] No. of No. of Endemic % No. of No. of Threatened Species Species endemics Endemic Species Threatened Species Amphibians 101+ 79+ 78% 24 24 Reptiles 258+ 170+ 66% 8 4 Birds 5761 195+1 34% 74 59 Mammals 204+1, 2 111+1 54% 51 41 Total 1139+ 555+1 49% 157 128 95 Legend: + includes new species (38 species of amphibians, 35 species of reptiles; 15 species of mammals); 1 includes rediscovered species 2 25 species of dolphins, whales and dugong The country’s marine waters cover 2.21 M km2 with a coastline of 22,450 km and an estimated 27,000 km2 of coral reefs [21]. -
China's Intentions
Dealing with China in a Globalized World: Some Concerns and Considerations Published by Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. 2020 5/F Cambridge Center Bldg., 108 Tordesillas cor. Gallardo Sts., Salcedo Village, Makati City 1227 Philippines www.kas.de/philippines [email protected] Cover page image, design, and typesetting by Kriselle de Leon Printed in the Philippines Printed with fnancial support from the German Federal Government. © Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., 2020 The views expressed in the contributions to this publication are those of the individual authors and do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of Konrad- Adenauer-Stiftung or of the organizations with which the authors are afliated. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission. Edited by Marie Antoinette P. de Jesus eISBN: 978-621-96332-1-5 In Memory of Dr. Aileen San Pablo Baviera Table of contents i Foreword • Stefan Jost 7 1 Globality and Its Adversaries in the 21st Century • Xuewu Gu 9 Globality: A new epochal phenomenon of the 21st century 9 Understanding the conditional and spatial referentiality of globality 11 Globality and its local origins 12 Is globality measurable? 13 Dangerous adversaries of globality 15 Conclusion 18 2 China’s Intentions: A Historical Perspective • Kerry Brown 23 Getting the parameters right: What China are we talking about and in which way? 23 Contrasting -
When Big Business and Farmers' Interest Collide
When big business and farmers’ interest collide: A discussion of the drivers and effects of farmland conversion in the Province of Bulacan, Philippines Prepared by Ma. Cristina Arceo-Dumlao with Elvira Baladad Nathaniel Don Marquez Denise Hyacinth Joy Musni Marianne Jane Naungayan1 For the Asian NGO Coalition for Agrarian Reform and Rural Development (ANGOC) April 2021 1 With assistance from Mark Joseph Jose, Petronilo Bernardo, Marciano Mananghaya, Faustino Mananghaya, Mario Pacheco, Romeo Bautista, and Cecilia Maniego ACKNOWLEDGMENT Special thanks to Ka Elvie and Mark Joseph for assistance in the focus group discussions with farmers in Bulacan, including the Samahan ng mga Nagkaka-isang Magsasaka ng Sta Barbara, on 5 August 2020. Appreciation goes to the participants of the focus group discussion last 8 March 2021 for their inputs in finalizing the paper. Thanks to Fair Finance Philippines through the Initiatives for Dialogue & Empowerment through Alternative Legal Services, Inc. (IDEALS, Inc.) for the financial support for the conduct of this study. DISCLAIMER The views cited in this study do not necessarily reflect those of Fair Finance Philippines and IDEALS, Inc. CITATION Arceo-Dumlao, M.C., Baladad, E., Marquez, N.D., Musni, D.H.J., Naungayan, M.J. (2021). When big business and farmers’ interest collide: A discussion of the drivers and effects of farmland conversion in the Province of Bulacan, Philippines. Asian NGO Coalition for Agrarian Reform and Rural Development (ANGOC) and Fair Finance Philippines (FFP). When big business and farmers’ interests collide Contents List of Acronyms Used 5 Introduction 6 Shrinking agricultural lands in Central Luzon and Bulacan 10 Drivers of land conversion in Bulacan 13 Two Case Stories of Land Conversion in Bulacan, Philippines 14 CASE 1: The case of Sta. -
Notes, References
This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Developing Country Debt and Economic Performance, Volume 3: Country Studies - Indonesia, Korea, Philippines, Turkey Volume Author/Editor: Jeffrey D. Sachs and Susan M. Collins, editors Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-30455-8 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/sach89-2 Conference Date: September 21-23, 1987 Publication Date: 1989 Chapter Title: Notes, References Chapter Author: Robert S. Dohner, Ponciano Intal, Jr. Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c9055 Chapter pages in book: (p. 593 - 614) 593 Philippines/Notes In contrast, much of Philippine policy, and certainly much of Philippine nationalism, has been defensive in character, designed to insulate and protect the economy from the outside world and the dangers perceived there. What the Philippines needs to develop is a more aggressive and self-confident nationalism, one that manipulates and takes advantage of the opportunities that the outside world offers-an “inward culture and an outward economy” rather than the reverse (Intal 1987). In fact, the situation in which the Philippines finds itself today is not so different from the situation characterizing many of the industrializing East Asian countries before their rapid growth took place, although none had the foreign indebtedness that the Philippines now shoulders. Japan, Hong Kong, and Singapore each had to deal with an unfavorable economic event that drastically limited their options and forced them to focus on export growth. For Taiwan and Korea it was the imminent reduction in U.S.