DOCSLIB.ORG

Concept of Knowledge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Concept of Knowledge CONCEPT OF KNOWLEDGE Chamber of dictionary answer the question for what is knowledge is (i) as the fact of knowing, (ii) information or what is known; (iii) the whole of what can be learned or found out. Further, it also knowledge as assured belief, that which is known, information, instruction, enlightenment, learning, practical skill and acquaintance. Considering all the above that are worthy of knowing. A term widely used by teachers, educators and policy makers is concept of knowledge and it refers to the body of information that teachers teach and that students are expected to learn in a given subject or content area such as English, Language Arts, Mathematics, Science, or Social Studies. Concept of knowledge generally refers to the facts, concepts, theories and principles that are taught and learned rather than related to skills such as reading, writing, or researching that student also learns in academic courses. Importance of knowledge Knowledge is not truth. Truth is inferred on the bases of available knowledge. The truth about the universe around us or the macrocosm to the microcosm is inferred knowledge. The knowledge of galaxy is inferred; so is the whole nuclear science, space, DNA etc,. Much of what we knew is not observed knowledge. They are known through their effects, properties, and characteristics. It is at the stage of inference that employment of methods for drawing inferences that philosophy is at work. Knowledge certified by the philosophy enters the curriculum of education. Methods approved by philosophy for building knowledge from the bases of methods and techniques of teaching. The truth arrived by philosophy sets the goals and objectives of education as well as instruments and uses of evaluation. Like this knowledge helps philosophy to interpret, guide, monitor and validating the educational process at every stages. Nature of knowledge Epistemology is the theory of knowledge. It deals with knowledge as a universal matter and aims to discover what is involved in the process of knowing. As such it belongs for the most part to the critical or analytical aspects of philosophy. It asks many questions. Is there something common to all the deferent activities to which we apply the term “knowing”? Does it know a special sort of mental act? Can we anything beyond the objects with which our senses acquaint us? Does knowing make any difference to the object know? These are not idle questions. For if we can know that the knowledge we possess is beyond error, that knowledge becomes a foundation of our search for more of it. Admittedly it may folly to believe that we shall ever discover true knowledge when all we have ever known is only an approximation of it. Doubtful knowledge then only generates more doubtful knowledge. As Santayana wrote, knowledge is a “torch of smoky pine that lights the pathway but one step ahead, across a void of mystery and dread”. Still we must strive, though a step at a time, to understand as well as we can the source of it, we shall be in a better position to understand the true nature of that reality to which it is related.Unlike philosophy, epistemology is not interested in amassing and classifying facts and data and subjecting them to statistical process. The epistemologist has ideas about how people think and feel, but he does not claim to be able to explain them scientifically. He is, after all, a philosopher and not a social scientist. The epistemologist may possess all the information commonly described as “knowledge’, but still he will ask the question, ‘what is knowledge after all’? and he may not come up with an answer.He also examines relevant psychological concepts such as perception, memory, and reinforcement to determine whether they are consistent, not necessarily with factual matters but with themselves. Knowing the psychological problem is to state and assess the very grounds on which knowledge rests and claim to knowledge are made. There are, of course, different types of knowledge, are important. 1.1 GENESIS OF KNOWLEDGE Now let us examine the different sources of knowledge Sense Experience Empirical Knowledge Sense experience is the major source of knowledge which comes through senses. Modern science is empirical in methods; concepts are formed as a result of sense experience. By seeing, hearing, smelling, feeling and tasting. We form our composite of the world around us. An empirical cautions us to “look and see”, whereas a rationalist tells us to “think things through”. Reason Rational Knowledge The view which says that our knowledge is essentially knowledge of universal and that these are known by the mind and not by senses is called Rationalism. Reasoning or through is the central factor in knowledge forms which we derive universally valid judgments that are consistent with one another certain mathematical and logical truths, for instance, are ‘self evident’ kinds of knowledge that appeal to our reason. And two contradictory statements both cannot be true at the same time. Moreover, when we say that if A is greater that B and B is greater than C, and then A is greater than C, here we are making a true statement based on reasoning and not derived from the sense. Experimentation The experimentation can be defined as a process of observation under controlled conditions.” We know the bridge is safe because six of us just crossed it” this instance suggests that knowledge is the product of tested experiences in which sense perception is an ingredient but in which the effect of what happens is the basic measure. We depend on experimental knowledge for particular facts of everyday world. However, our senses deceive at times. I would like to draw your attention towards an example of the stick that looks vent in water but turns out to be straight when we touch it. At times we see what we are conditioned to see not what is actually there. The accuracy of the sense may be reduced further by such elements as cold, fog, heat, noise or smog. From this discussion you are able to identify that experiment is another important source of knowledge. Authority The first fundamental source of knowledge is authoritarianism. It may, however, be noted that its central doctrine is that, ultimate source of knowledge is authority of different kinds - the God, the Sate, Tradition of the Expert. You should notice that authoritative knowledge it accepted as true because, it comes from experts. We shall now analyze why authoritative knowledge is inadequate. The reason for this conclusion is what constitute authority and by want criterion we should select our authority as against another. Most of our factual knowledge is based on authority. Intuition Intuition is perhaps the most personal way of knowing. It occurs on what psychologists call the subliminal level; beneath the “threshold of consciousness” it is connected intimately with feeling and emotion and contrasts with the logical process usually associated with thinking at conscious level. As persons we see “in a sudden flash of insight” that something is the case. We apprehend knowledge directly gain direct access into the heart of reality. Yet, we do not know how we acquired this knowledge. Only an intense feeling seems to convince us we have discovered what we were looking for. Revealed Faith Knowledge Faith is in part the king of knowledge that God discloses to man. In this omnisense God inspires certain men to record. His revelation in permanent form, whereby it may become accessible to all mankind for the Hindu’s it is contained in the Bhagavad-Gita and the Upanishads. For Christian’s and Jew’s it is contained in the Bible: for the Mohammedan’s, in the Khoran. Divinely authenticated, it promises that those who accept it never, according to their own rights, can be mistaken. Human interpretation may distort parts of it, but in itself it is Devine truth. You will agree that revealed knowledge is confined to whatever a religion or sect accepts to be the world of God. It is also based on supernatural phenomena, but it can apply to natural phenomena, as in Genesis. There can be very little argument about the credibility of its source. It neither can be proved nor disproved. One accepts it on faint, but stressed whenever possible by reason and critical experience. 1.2 TYPES OF KNOWLEDGE Philosophers were classified the types knowledge in to the three major types that are personal, procedural and propositional knowledge. 1.2.1 Personal Knowledge The first kind of knowledge is personal knowledge, or knowledge by acquaintance. This is the kind of knowledge that we are claiming to have when we say things like “I know Incidental music.” The first type of knowledge is personal knowledge, or knowledge by acquaintance. Knowledge in this sense is to do with being familiar with something. Personal knowledge does, possibly, involve possessing at least some propositional knowledge. What is important is that personal knowledge involves more than knowledge of propositions. 1.2.2 Procedural Knowledge The second kind of knowledge is procedural knowledge, or knowledge how to do something. People, who claim to know how to juggle, or how to drive, are not simply claiming that they understand the theory involved in those activities. Rather, they are claiming that actually possess the skills involved, that they are able to do these things. Procedural knowledge clearly differs from propositional knowledge. It is possible to know all of the theory behind driving a car (i.e. to have all of the relevant propositional knowledge) without actually knowing how to drive a car (i.e. without having the procedural knowledge). You may know which pedal is the accelerator and which is the brake.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ED305329.Pdf
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 305 329 SP 030 956 AUTHOR Sarvimaki, Anneli TITLE Knowledge in Interactive Practice Disciplines. An Analysis of Knowledge in Education and Health Care. Research Bulletin 68. INSTITUTION Helsinki Univ. (Finland). Dept. of Education. REPORT NO ISBN-951-45-4787-X PUB DATE 88 NOTE 292p. PUB TYPE Reports - Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC12 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Educational Objectives; Educational Philosophy; Educational Practices; *Educational Principles; Health Promotion; *Interaction; Sociolinguistics; *Theory Practice Relationship; Values ABSTRACT This study formulates a conception of knowledge in interactive practice disciplines such as education and health care and clarifies different types of knowledge in these disciplines. Focus is on the relationship between practical and theoretical knowledge. Four theses are discussed: (1) the role of knowledge in an interactive practice is to guide practice; (2) different types of knowledge in an interactive practice consist of value-knowledge, factual knowledge and procedural knowledge, parts of which are unarticulated, parts articulated; (3) science is a way of articulating and creating knowledge that can be used as internal action determinants in the practice concerned; and (4) theories in an interactive practice can have both a theoretical and a practical purpose but the theoretical purpose is also indirectly linked to the practical. (Author/JD) "t***************************************************2****************** * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the
    [Show full text]
  • Procedural and Declarative Knowledge an Evolutionary Perspective
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DSpace at Open Universiteit Nederland Procedural and Declarative Knowledge An Evolutionary Perspective Timon ten Berge Ren´e van Hezewijk Vrije Universiteit Utrecht University Abstract. It appears that there are resemblances in the organization of memory and the visual system, although the functions of these faculties differ considerably. In this article, the principles behind this organization are discussed. One important principle regards the distinction between declarative and procedural knowledge, between knowing that and knowing how. Declarative knowledge is considered here not as an alternative kind of knowledge, as is usually the case in theories of memory, but as part of procedural knowledge. In our view this leads to another approach with respect to the distinction. Declarative knowledge has occupied more attention in (cognitive) psychological research than can be justified on the basis of the importance of procedural knowledge for behavior. We also discuss the question whether there are other brain faculties that reflect the same organizational characteristics. We conclude with some speculations about the consequent role of consciousness in such a tentative model. KEY WORDS: declarative knowledge, evolutionary psychology, memory, procedural knowledge, vision Introduction: Modularity in the Human Brain Traditionally, cognitive psychology has viewed the human mind as a general information-processing device. On this view, a human being is born with a set of general reasoning capacities that can be used when confronted with any problem. A growing number of researchers are supporting a view of the human brain as an organized collection of specialized modules, each with its own domain-specific knowledge and responses.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Meaning of Knowledge in Design Research Kristina Niedderer University of Hertfordshire
    V.2:2 April 2007 www.designresearchsociety.org Design Research Society ISSN 1752-8445 Mapping the Meaning of Knowledge in Design Research Kristina Niedderer University of Hertfordshire Knowledge plays a vital role in our life This question has arisen for design in Table of Contents: in that it reflects how we understand the UK, as well as more generally for the world around us and thus deter- creative and practice-led disciplines Articles: 1 Mapping the Meaning of Knowledge mines how we act upon it. In this sense, (CPDs), because research regulations in Design Research knowledge is of particular importance and requirements in the UK remain Kristina Niedderer for designers because they act to shape silent about what knowledge and our world. Conventionally, knowledge understanding mean in the context of 3 Call for Papers: Design Research creation has been assumed by (design) their specifications while implicitly pri- Quarterly research. However developments of oritising propositional knowledge over Case Studies in Research: Knowledge using practice within research have knowledge that cannot be expressed in and Inquiry pointed to knowledge creation within that form (Niedderer 2007). and through practice. This has raised This has led to a number of prob- Listings: the question of the meaning, role and lems concerning the role and format 14 Current Research in Design: format of knowledge in both research of knowledge in research and practice ToCs from Leading Design Journals and practice, and about the compatibil- in the UK. For example, because of the ity between knowledge of research and language-based mode of proposition- 21 Upcoming Events Worldwide practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Descartes' Hostages: Mind and Observability in Education
    Descartes’ Hostages: Mind and Observability in Education by Shannon Rodgers B.A. (Hon.), Simon Fraser University, 1994 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Curriculum Theory & Implementation: Philosophy of Education Program Faculty of Education © Shannon Rodgers 2017 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2017 Copyright in this work rests with the author. Please ensure that any reproduction or re-use is done in accordance with the relevant national copyright legislation. Approval Name: Shannon Rodgers Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title: Descartes’ Hostages: Mind and Observability in Education Examining Committee: Chair: Dr. Stephen Smith Teaching Professor Dr. Charles Bingham Senior Supervisor Professor ___________________________________________ Dr. Heesoon Bai Supervisor Professor ___________________________________________ Dr. Sean Blenkinsop Supervisor Assistant Professor ___________________________________________ Dr. Allan MacKinnon Internal Examiner Associate Professor ___________________________________________ Dr. Taylor Webb External Examiner Associate Professor Dept. of Educational Studies University of British Columbia ___________________________________________ Date Defended/Approved: June 14th, 2017 ii Ethics Statement iii Abstract My purpose in this dissertation is to argue that given the relationship among the concepts of mind, knowledge, education and assessment, educators must pay more attention to our current view of mind. Educators use assessment practices,
    [Show full text]
  • A Knowledge Concept Map: Structured Concept Analysis from Systematic Literature Review
    29 a Knowledge Concept Map: Structured Concept analysis from Systematic literature review Philip Sisson1 and Julie J.C.H. Ryan2 Abstract The purpose of this article is to present a mental model of knowledge as a concept map as an input to knowledge management (KM) investigations. This article’s extended knowledge concept map can serve as a resource where the investigation, development, or application of knowledge would be served with a broad mental model of knowledge. Previously unrelated concepts are related; knowledge concepts can sometimes be expressed as a range, i.e., certainty related states: view, opinion, sentiment, persuasion, belief, and conviction. Extrathesis is identified as a potential skill level higher than synthesis, and associated with the concepts: discovery, institution, insight (the event), revelation, or illumination that precedes innovation. Qualitative methods were used to gather and document concepts. System engineering and object analysis methods were applied to define and relate concepts. However, the theoretical sampling and theoretical saturation methods applied do not guarantee all appropriate concepts have been identified. Given the breadth, depth, and dimensionality of concepts of knowledge, later researchers may add additional concepts. This article provides evidence of additional things people know, an alternative to psychology’s acquaintanceship, understanding and placement of newer categorizations of knowledge in relation to older ones, and suggests that ranges for knowledge terms exist. This article extends the 2015 paper on this topic by: 1) taking a deeper look into epistemological terms and relationships, 2) providing contextual definitions, 3) suggesting extrathesis as an idea beyond synthesis, 4) updating the concept map; and 5) providing new insight on the overloaded knows including adding an eleventh know.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spaces of Data, Information, and Knowledge
    The Spaces of Data, Information, and Knowledge Xiaoyu Chena and Dongming Wangb,c Abstract We study the data space D of any given data set X and explain how functions and relations are defined over D. From D and for a specific domain ∆ we construct the information space I of X by interpreting variables, functions, and explicit relations over D in ∆ and by including other relations that D implies under the interpretation in ∆. Then from I we build up the knowledge space K of X as the product of two spaces KT and KP , where KT is obtained from I by using the induction principle to generalize propositional relations to quantified relations, the deduction principle to generate new relations, and standard mechanisms to validate relations and KP is the space of specifications of methods with operational instructions which are valid in KT . Through our construction of the three topological spaces the following key observation is made clear: the retrieval of information from the given data set for ∆ consists essentially in mining domain objects and relations, and the discovery of knowledge from the retrieved information consists essentially in applying the induction and deduction principles to generate propositions, synthesizing and modeling the information to generate specifications of methods with operational instructions, and validating the propositions and specifications. Based on this observation, efficient approaches may be designed to discover profound knowledge automatically from simple data, as demonstrated by the result of our study in the case of geometry. Keywords data space, declarative knowledge, deduction principle, implied knowledge, induction principle, information retrieval, knowledge discovery, procedural knowledge, quantified relation arXiv:1411.1497v1 [cs.AI] 6 Nov 2014 1 Introduction With increasingly wide use of digital devices and networks, more and more scientific explorations and social activities are carried out electronically, where the involved objects, phenomena, and behaviors of interest are measured and presented in the form of data.
    [Show full text]
  • Outcome Evaluation and Procedural Knowledge in Implicit Learning
    Outcome Evaluation and Procedural Knowledge in Implicit Learning Danilo Fum ([email protected]) Department of Psychology, University of Trieste Via S.Anastasio 12, I-34134, Trieste, Italy Andrea Stocco ([email protected]) Department of Psychology, University of Trieste Via S.Anastasio 12, I-34134, Trieste, Italy Abstract form. Starting from the 90s, however, it has been suggested that many results could be explained by Although implicit learning has been considered in recent supposing that participants acquire concrete, fragmentary, years as a declarative memory phenomenon, we show that a declarative knowledge of the task represented through procedural model can better elucidate some intriguing and instances. Instance-based knowledge has indeed been unexpected data deriving from experiments carried out with Sugar Factory (Berry & Broadbent, 1984), one of the most shown to underlie or significantly affect performance on popular paradigms in this area, and can account for other artificial grammar learning (Perruchet & Pacteau, 1990), phenomena reported in the literature that are at odds with sequence prediction (Perruchet, 1994) and dynamic current explanations. The core of the model resides in its system control tasks (Dienes & Fahey, 1995; Lebiere, adaptive mechanism of action selection that is related to Wallach & Taatgen, 1998, Taatgen & Wallach, 2002). outcome evaluation. We derived two critical predictions In this paper we will focus on a widely adopted from the model concerning: (a) the role of situational dynamic system control task known as Sugar Factory factors, and (b) the effect of a change in the criterion (Berry & Broadbent, 1984). In this task, henceforth SF, adopted by participants to evaluate the outcome of their participants are asked to imagine themselves in chief of a actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mind, Machines and Language
    Mind, Machines and Language ELL457/HUL381 [Slides by Santanu Chaudhury, Hiranmay Ghosh, and Sumeet Agarwal] [Material sourced from Friedenberg and Silverman, 2006] Introduction: Philosophical & Psychological Perspectives “The sciences have developed in an order the reverse of what might have been expected. What was most remote from ourselves was first brought under the domain of law, and then, gradually, what was nearer: first the heavens, next the earth, then animal and vegetable life, then the human body, and last of all (as yet very imperfectly) the human mind.” —Bertrand Russell, 1935 Neuroscience Electrical Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Science Computer Science Philosophy Linguistics Cognitive Science: Mind as Computer ● Representation ➔ Concepts ➔ Propositions ➔ Rules ➔ Analogies ➔ Digital (symbols) ➔ Analog (images) ● Transformation/Processing/Computation Example: Analogical reasoning [Duncker '45] Suppose you are a doctor faced with a patient who has a malignant tumor in his stomach. To operate on the patient is impossible, but unless the tumor is destroyed, the patient will die. A kind of ray, at a sufficiently high intensity, can destroy the tumor. Unfortunately, at this intensity the healthy tissue that the rays pass through on the way to the tumor will also be destroyed. At lower intensities the rays are harmless to healthy tissue, but will not affect the tumor. How can the rays be used to destroy the tumor without injuring the healthy tissue? Analogy A small country was ruled from a strong fortress by a dictator. The fortress was situated in the middle of the country, surrounded by farms and villages. Many roads led to the fortress through the countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • Representation of Procedural Knowledge
    NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY COMPUTER SCIENCE DEPARTMENT Representation of Procedural Knowledge Roger T Hartley Abstract A case is made for correcting a perceived imbalance between the usual ways of representing declarative and procedural knowledge. A proposed solution joins the traditional conceptual graph notation and elements of visual programming languages. The aim is to maintain the visual nature of both notations without greatly changing each one. Representation of Procedural Knowledge 1. Introduction We start with the premise that there is a clear duality between declarative and procedural knowledge [Ryle, 1949]. One form of knowledge is inadequate without the other, and thus choosing one form of knowledge over the other for any reason would lead to philosophical falsehoods at worst, or a serious neglect at best. We believe that there has been such a neglect of procedural knowledge over the course of history, rooted in our human predilection for language on the one hand, and pictures on the other. Add to this that we are still puzzled over the nature of time. It has only recently, and reluctantly, been incorporated into our understanding of the physical world as an equal to space. Processes are hard to perceive, hard to understand, and, in the end, get the short end of the theoretical stick. We are much happier with observable measurement - the visual realm again - and static relationships between relatively fixed quantities. This paper is a brief investigation of the nature of the duality between the two types of knowledge, and their representation for processing in computer form. Our preference for the conceptual graph formalism will lead us to a particular set of choices for representing procedural knowledge so that the perceived imbalance with declarative knowledge can be redressed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Truth-Based Epistemological Framework for Supporting Teachers in Integrating Indigenous Knowledge Into Science Teaching
    A Truth-Based Epistemological Framework for Supporting Teachers in Integrating Indigenous Knowledge into Science Teaching Gracious Zinyeka*, Gilbert O.M. Onwu and Max Braun Department of Science Mathematics & Technology Education, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa *Corresponding author. 713 Popgum Road, Greenhill, Bindura, Zimbabwe. Email: [email protected] Integrating indigenous knowledge (IK) into school science teaching is one way of maximising the socio- cultural relevance of science education for enhanced learners’ performance. The epistemological differences however between the nature of science (NOS) and nature of indigenous knowledge (NOIK) constitute a major challenge for an inclusive IK-science curriculum integration. This article is about the application of a truth-based epistemological framework designed to support teachers to make decisions on how specific pieces of indigenous knowledge (local traditional practices and technologies) may be included in science lessons. First, an attempt was made to develop a truth-based epistemological framework for identifying epistemology(ies) of indigenous knowledge and practices. Second a group of science teachers used the truth-based epistemological framework to examine ways in which some specified IK practices that comprised a coherent set of knowledge themes on health, agriculture and technology could be integrated into the school science curriculum in a valid and legitimate way. The IK practices used in the study were systematically identified and documented by means of personal observations and interviews of key informants in a rural community in Zimbabwe. The main findings of the study showed that the truth-based epistemological framework was useful in providing an epistemological basis for including some IK practices in science teaching and learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Knowledge Gary Hardegree Department of Philosophy University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003
    Notes on Knowledge Gary Hardegree Department of Philosophy University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................................1 2. Epistemology ...................................................................................................................................2 3. The Verb ‘Know’.............................................................................................................................2 4. Propositional Attitudes and Propositional Adjectives .....................................................................4 5. Propositions......................................................................................................................................5 6. The Distinction between Sentences and Propositions......................................................................6 7. The Ubiquitous ‘That’......................................................................................................................6 8. Direct versus Indirect Quotation......................................................................................................7 9. Sentential Attitudes and Properties..................................................................................................8 10. The Ubiquitous ‘It’...........................................................................................................................9 11. Sentential Attitudes can be Weird..................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-01-08 Peels on El Kassar
    http://social-epistemology.com ISSN: 2471-9560 Exploring the Boundaries of Ignorance: Its Nature and Accidental Features Rik Peels, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam –––––––––––––––––– Peels, Rik. “Exploring the Boundaries of Ignorance: Its Nature and Accidental Features.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 1 (2019): 10-18. Short url: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-456 (provided by WordPress) Vol. 8, no. 1 (2019): 10-18. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-456 Nadja El Kassar is right that different fields in philosophy use rather different conceptions of ignorance. I also agree with her that there seem to be three major conceptions of ignorance: (i) ignorance as propositional ignorance, which she calls the ‘propositional conception of ignorance’, (ii) ignorance as actively upheld false outlooks, which she names the ‘agential conception of ignorance’, and (iii) ignorance as an epistemic practice, which she dubs the ‘structural conception of ignorance’. It is remarkable that nobody else has addressed the question before of how these three conceptions relate to each other. I consider it a great virtue of her lucid essay that she not only considers this question in detail, but also provides an account that is meant to do justice to all these different conceptions of ignorance. Let us call her account the El Kassar Synthesis. It reads as follows: Ignorance is a disposition of an epistemic agent that manifests itself in her beliefs – either she has no belief about p or a false belief – and her epistemic attitudes (doxastic attitudes, epistemic virtues, epistemic vices).1 My reply to her insightful paper is structured as follows. First, I argue that her synthesis needs revision on various important points (§2).
    [Show full text]