Individual and Collective Encoding of Risk in Animal Groups

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Individual and Collective Encoding of Risk in Animal Groups Individual and collective encoding of risk in animal groups Matthew M. G. Sosnaa,1, Colin R. Twomeyb, Joseph Bak-Colemana, Winnie Poelc,d, Bryan C. Danielse, Pawel Romanczukc,d, and Iain D. Couzinf,g,h,1 aDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544; bDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; cInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Department of Biology, Humboldt Universitat¨ zu Berlin, D-10099 Berlin, Germany; dBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Humboldt Universitat¨ zu Berlin, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; eArizona State University-Santa Fe Institute (ASU–SFI) Center for Biosocial Complex Systems, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287; fDepartment of Collective Behaviour, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, D-78547 Konstanz, Germany; gDepartment of Biology, University of Konstanz, D-78547 Konstanz, Germany; and hCentre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, D-78547 Konstanz, Germany Edited by Gene E. Robinson, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL, and approved August 28, 2019 (received for review April 1, 2019) The need to make fast decisions under risky and uncertain condi- For example, if we consider an individual in isolation, it must tions is a widespread problem in the natural world. While there base its decisions on sensory inputs and previous experience, has been extensive work on how individual organisms dynami- which may also be modulated by physiological state. However, cally modify their behavior to respond appropriately to changing it is clearly the individual that is “responsible” for the decision. environmental conditions (and how this is encoded in the brain), If we consider instead individuals embedded in a social net- we know remarkably little about the corresponding aspects of work, another possibility is introduced: As in other information- collective information processing in animal groups. For example, processing networks, such as neural circuits, computation may many groups appear to show increased “sensitivity” in the pres- be affected by changes in the individual components themselves ence of perceived threat, as evidenced by the increased frequency (network “nodes”) and/or by changes in the structural connec- and magnitude of repeated cascading waves of behavioral change tivity (topology) among the components (network “edges”). In often observed in fish schools and bird flocks under such cir- animal groups, individuals often exhibit a highly dynamic group cumstances. How such context-dependent changes in collective structure, with individuals’ spatial positions, orientations, and ECOLOGY sensitivity are mediated, however, is unknown. Here we address sensory neighborhoods changing rapidly (5, 7–9). Yet nonethe- this question using schooling fish as a model system, focusing on less, individuals exhibit the capacity to change, consistently and 2 nonexclusive hypotheses: 1) that changes in collective respon- repeatedly, the topology of their social connectivity by switch- siveness result from changes in how individuals respond to social ing between what is often a relatively small number of group cues (i.e., changes to the properties of the “nodes” in the social structural states (e.g., ref. 9). This presents an additional nuance network), and 2) that they result from changes made to the struc- to understanding collective cognition (10–12), as while individu- tural connectivity of the network itself (i.e., the computation is als may be influenced by the topology of their network, they are encoded in the “edges” of the network). We find that despite the also able to modify this topology through their movements and fact that perceived risk increases the probability for individuals to perception of the environment. initiate an alarm, the context-dependent change in collective sen- sitivity predominantly results not from changes in how individuals Significance respond to social cues, but instead from how individuals modify the spatial structure, and correspondingly the topology of the net- work of interactions, within the group. Risk is thus encoded as a Many biological systems exhibit an emergent ability to pro- collective property, emphasizing that in group-living species indi- cess information about their environment. This collective cog- vidual fitness can depend strongly on coupling between scales of nition emerges as a result of both the behavior of system com- behavioral organization. ponents and their interactions, yet the relative importance of the two is often hard to disentangle. Here, we combined experiments and modeling to examine how fish schools col- group structure j antipredator behavior j social contagion lectively encode information about the external environment. We demonstrate that risk is predominantly encoded in the key challenge faced by animals is to appropriately adjust physical structure of groups, which individuals modulate in Atheir behavioral responses to changing environmental con- a way that augments or dampens behavioral cascades. We texts (1). To do so, organisms must make probabilistic decisions show that this modulation is necessary for behavioral cas- based on often imperfect or conflicting sensory information. cades to spread and that it allows collective systems to be Longer-term states such as fear or hunger can be considered as responsive to their environments even without changes in a persistent (but updatable) memory stored by the animal that individual computation. modulates the mapping from sensory input to behavioral change. The mechanisms by which individual organisms achieve effec- Author contributions: M.M.G.S., J.B.-C., and I.D.C. designed research; M.M.G.S. per- tive context-dependent behavior have been well studied (2–4), formed research; C.R.T., W.P., B.C.D., and P.R. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; M.M.G.S. and W.P. analyzed data; M.M.G.S., C.R.T., J.B.-C., W.P., B.C.D., P.R., and I.D.C. but what has been comparatively rarely explored is how such wrote the paper; and C.R.T., J.B.-C., W.P., B.C.D., and P.R. developed the mathematical behavioral plasticity is encoded by organisms that live in groups. model and performed and analyzed numerical simulations.y In highly coordinated animal groups, such as many species of The authors declare no conflict of interest.y schooling fish, flocking birds, or herding ungulates, individual This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.y reproductive success is often intimately linked with the func- This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- tional complexity of collective behavior (5, 6). This introduces a NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).y coupling between individual (“microscopic”) properties and col- 1 To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: [email protected] or lective (“macroscopic”) behavior, and it is reasonable to expect [email protected] that this coupling will impact how evolution has shaped the This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. mechanisms by which individuals sense and respond to changing 1073/pnas.1905585116/-/DCSupplemental.y environmental conditions. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1905585116 PNAS Latest Articles j 1 of 6 Downloaded by guest on September 27, 2021 Here we explore the possibility that information process- AB ing may be facilitated not only by individuals changing their internal behavioral rules/states, as is typically considered in animal behavior, but that, by forming a networked system, indi- viduals can facilitate collective computation by changing the structural topology of the network (their social connectivity), without necessarily adjusting the way they respond to sensory information. We refer to changes in individual behavioral rules 5 cm and states as individuals changing their responsiveness and to changes in group structure as individuals changing their spatial positioning. C Across many animal taxa, group structure is known to be highly 8 sensitive to group members’ perceptions of risk and resources (13–19). These changes have generally been attributed to sim- 7 ple game theoretic considerations (20, 21), where structure is merely a byproduct of individuals acting to maximize their sur- 6 vival (5). But overlooked is the possibility that group structure, as an emergent encoding of the external environment, could itself 5 be an important mechanism by which organisms effectively pro- NND (cm) cess information in a changing world. In this way, the group’s 4 structure could act as a collective memory that modifies future Schreckstoff: 1st exposure decisions, similar to how an individual’s memory guides its own Schreckstoff: 3rd exposure 3 Water behavior (22, 23). To test the relative contributions of group members’ respon- 0 102030405060 siveness vs. spatial positioning to collective information process- Time (min) ing, here we present results from experiments with schooling fish (golden shiners, Notemigonus crysoleucas), known to have highly DE dynamic and self-regulating group structure (9, 16, 19), and use these data to investigate context-dependent changes in individ- 40 1 ual and collective responses to perceived risk. Like many fish 30 0.8 species (3, 24, 25), predation is a source of extremely high mor- 0.6 tality in the wild (26) and juveniles form coordinated schools in 20 0.4 response to this risk. Shiners also exhibit startle responses as an 10 escape behavior (27) that is socially contagious (28). Startles in 0.2 this species occur even in the absence of an external stimulus, 0 0 N visible neighbors N visible 1st 3rd 1st 3rd and these spontaneous false alarms propagate through the group of vision Proportion in the same manner as triggered true alarms (28). In nature, exposure exposure exposure exposure false alarms account for a high proportion of overall alarms (29– Fig. 1. Effect of perceived predation risk on group structure. (A) A subset 32), very likely because there are such considerable costs to not of the school prior to Schreckstoff. Rays (purple) represent a visualization of responding to true threats relative to false alarms (33).
Recommended publications
  • Dispersal, Philopatry, and the Role of Fissionfusion Dynamics In
    MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE, **(*): ***–*** (*** 2012) C 2012 by the Society for Marine Mammalogy DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2011.00559.x Dispersal, philopatry, and the role of fission-fusion dynamics in bottlenose dolphins YI-JIUN JEAN TSAI and JANET MANN,1 Reiss Science Building, Rm 406, Department of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, U.S.A. ABSTRACT In this quantitative study of locational and social dispersal at the individual level, we show that bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) continued to use their na- tal home ranges well into adulthood. Despite substantial home range overlap, mother–offspring associations decreased after weaning, particularly for sons. These data provide strong evidence for bisexual locational philopatry and mother–son avoidance in bottlenose dolphins. While bisexual locational philopatry offers the benefits of familiar social networks and foraging habitats, the costs of philopatry may be mitigated by reduced mother–offspring association, in which the risk of mother–daughter resource competition and mother–son mating is reduced. Our study highlights the advantages of high fission–fusion dynamics and longitudinal studies, and emphasizes the need for clarity when describing dispersal in this and other species. Key words: bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops sp., association, juvenile, philopatry, locational dispersal, mother-offspring, ranging, site fidelity, social dispersal. Dispersal is a key life history process that affects population demography, spatial distribution, and genetic structure, as well as individual
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Density in Population Dynamics with Strong and Weak Allee Effect
    Keya et al. J Egypt Math Soc (2021) 29:4 https://doi.org/10.1186/s42787-021-00114-x Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society ORIGINAL RESEARCH Open Access The infuence of density in population dynamics with strong and weak Allee efect Kamrun Nahar Keya1, Md. Kamrujjaman2* and Md. Shafqul Islam3 *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract 2 Department In this paper, we consider a reaction–difusion model in population dynamics and of Mathematics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, study the impact of diferent types of Allee efects with logistic growth in the hetero- Bangladesh geneous closed region. For strong Allee efects, usually, species unconditionally die out Full list of author information and an extinction-survival situation occurs when the efect is weak according to the is available at the end of the article resource and sparse functions. In particular, we study the impact of the multiplicative Allee efect in classical difusion when the sparsity is either positive or negative. Nega- tive sparsity implies a weak Allee efect, and the population survives in some domain and diverges otherwise. Positive sparsity gives a strong Allee efect, and the popula- tion extinct without any condition. The infuence of Allee efects on the existence and persistence of positive steady states as well as global bifurcation diagrams is presented. The method of sub-super solutions is used for analyzing equations. The stability condi- tions and the region of positive solutions (multiple solutions may exist) are presented. When the difusion is absent, we consider the model with and without harvesting, which are initial value problems (IVPs) and study the local stability analysis and present bifurcation analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Methods Offer Powerful Insights Into Social Evolution in Bees Sarah Kocher, Robert Paxton
    Comparative methods offer powerful insights into social evolution in bees Sarah Kocher, Robert Paxton To cite this version: Sarah Kocher, Robert Paxton. Comparative methods offer powerful insights into social evolution in bees. Apidologie, Springer Verlag, 2014, 45 (3), pp.289-305. 10.1007/s13592-014-0268-3. hal- 01234748 HAL Id: hal-01234748 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01234748 Submitted on 27 Nov 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Apidologie (2014) 45:289–305 Review article * INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France, 2014 DOI: 10.1007/s13592-014-0268-3 Comparative methods offer powerful insights into social evolution in bees 1 2 Sarah D. KOCHER , Robert J. PAXTON 1Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA 2Institute for Biology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany Received 9 September 2013 – Revised 8 December 2013 – Accepted 2 January 2014 Abstract – Bees are excellent models for studying the evolution of sociality. While most species are solitary, many form social groups. The most complex form of social behavior, eusociality, has arisen independently four times within the bees.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactive Robots in Experimental Biology 3 4 5 6 Jens Krause1,2, Alan F.T
    1 2 Interactive Robots in Experimental Biology 3 4 5 6 Jens Krause1,2, Alan F.T. Winfield3 & Jean-Louis Deneubourg4 7 8 9 10 11 12 1Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Department of Biology and 13 Ecology of Fishes, 12587 Berlin, Germany; 14 2Humboldt-University of Berlin, Department for Crop and Animal Sciences, Philippstrasse 15 13, 10115 Berlin, Germany; 16 3Bristol Robotics Laboratory, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol 17 BS16 1QY, UK; 18 4Unit of Social Ecology, Campus Plaine - CP 231, Université libre de Bruxelles, Bd du 19 Triomphe, B-1050 Brussels - Belgium 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Corresponding author: Krause, J. ([email protected]), Leibniz Institute of Freshwater 29 Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Department of the Biology and Ecology of Fishes, 30 Müggelseedamm 310, 12587 Berlin, Germany. 31 32 33 1 33 Interactive robots have the potential to revolutionise the study of social behaviour because 34 they provide a number of methodological advances. In interactions with live animals the 35 behaviour of robots can be standardised, morphology and behaviour can be decoupled (so that 36 different morphologies and behavioural strategies can be combined), behaviour can be 37 manipulated in complex interaction sequences and models of behaviour can be embodied by 38 the robot and thereby be tested. Furthermore, robots can be used as demonstrators in 39 experiments on social learning. The opportunities that robots create for new experimental 40 approaches have far-reaching consequences for research in fields such as mate choice, 41 cooperation, social learning, personality studies and collective behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Site Fidelity in Southern Elephant Seals of the Falkland Islands
    Filippo Galimberti 1 and Simona Sanvito 1,2 1 Elephant Seal Research Group, Sea Lion Island, Falkland Islands 2 Dept. of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s NF A1B 3X9, Canada ESRG technical report no. 3 Breeding site fidelity in southern elephant seals of the Falkland Islands Milano, 25th April 2000 © Elephant Seal Research Group – 2000 No part of this report can be cited without written permission from the authors. Address for correspondence: Dr. Filippo Galimberti – Via Buonarroti 35 – 20145 Milano – Italy Phone +39 02 4980504 – Fax +39 02 48008145 – Email [email protected] ABSTRACT Breeding site fidelity, i.e., the tendency to return to the same breeding site for consecutive breeding attempts, is an important component of mammal life history strategies, and seems almost ubiquitous in Pinnipedia species, at least for land breeding ones. Site fidelity may entail significant somatic benefits and costs, and, if coupled with return for first breeding attempt to birth site, may produce a genetic sub-structuring of populations. We present data on female and male site fidelity, together with preliminary information on female phylopatry, of southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina) of Sea Lion Island, the main breeding site of the species in the Falkland Islands. We found a high level of site fidelity at small scale (hundred of metres) in both sexes, although higher in females, even when considering up to five consecutive breeding seasons of the same individual. We discuss the behavioural and genetic implications of site fidelity, emphasizing that it may affect mating tactics, breeding success, and genetic sub-structuring of local populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Flocks, Herds, and Schools: a Distributed Behavioral Model 1
    Published in Computer Graphics, 21(4), July 1987, pp. 25-34. (ACM SIGGRAPH '87 Conference Proceedings, Anaheim, California, July 1987.) Flocks, Herds, and Schools: A Distributed Behavioral Model 1 Craig W. Reynolds Symbolics Graphics Division [obsolete addresses removed 2] Abstract The aggregate motion of a flock of birds, a herd of land animals, or a school of fish is a beautiful and familiar part of the natural world. But this type of complex motion is rarely seen in computer animation. This paper explores an approach based on simulation as an alternative to scripting the paths of each bird individually. The simulated flock is an elaboration of a particle system, with the simulated birds being the particles. The aggregate motion of the simulated flock is created by a distributed behavioral model much like that at work in a natural flock; the birds choose their own course. Each simulated bird is implemented as an independent actor that navigates according to its local perception of the dynamic environment, the laws of simulated physics that rule its motion, and a set of behaviors programmed into it by the "animator." The aggregate motion of the simulated flock is the result of the dense interaction of the relatively simple behaviors of the individual simulated birds. Categories and Subject Descriptors: 1.2.10 [Artificial Intelligence]: Vision and Scene Understanding; 1.3.5 [Computer Graphics]: Computational Geometry and Object Modeling; 1.3.7 [Computer Graphics]: Three Dimensional Graphics and Realism-Animation: 1.6.3 [Simulation and Modeling]: Applications. General Terms: Algorithms, design.b Additional Key Words, and Phrases: flock, herd, school, bird, fish, aggregate motion, particle system, actor, flight, behavioral animation, constraints, path planning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology of Mutualism
    Annual Reviews www.annualreviews.org/aronline AngRev. Ecol. Syst. 1982.13:315--47 Copyright©1982 by Annual Reviews lnc. All rightsreserved THE ECOLOGY OF MUTUALISM Douglas 1t. Boucher Departementdes sciences biologiques, Universit~ du Quebec~ Montreal, C. P. 8888, Suet. A, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaH3C 3P8 Sam James Departmentof Ecologyand Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA48109 Kathleen H. Keeler School of Life Sciences, University of Nebraska,Lincoln, Nebraska,USA 68588 INTRODUCTION Elementaryecology texts tell us that organismsinteract in three fundamen- tal ways, generally given the namescompetition, predation, and mutualism. The third memberhas gotten short shrift (264), and even its nameis not generally agreed on. Terms that may be considered synonyms,in whole or part, are symbiosis, commensalism,cooperation, protocooperation, mutual aid, facilitation, reciprocal altruism, and entraide. Weuse the term mutual- by University of Kanas-Lawrence & Edwards on 09/26/05. For personal use only. ism, defined as "an interaction betweenspecies that is beneficial to both," Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1982.13:315-347. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org since it has both historical priority (311) and general currency. Symbiosis is "the living together of two organismsin close association," and modifiers are used to specify dependenceon the interaction (facultative or obligate) and the range of species that can take part (oligophilic or polyphilic). We make the normal apologies concerning forcing continuous variation and diverse interactions into simple dichotomousclassifications, for these and all subsequentdefinitions. Thus mutualism can be defined, in brief, as a -b/q- interaction, while competition, predation, and eommensalismare respectively -/-, -/q-, and -t-/0. There remains, however,the question of howto define "benefit to the 315 0066-4162/82/1120-0315 $02.00 Annual Reviews www.annualreviews.org/aronline 316 BOUCHER, JAMES & KEELER species" without evoking group selection.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding a Mate with Eusocial Skills
    Finding a Mate With Eusocial Skills Chris Marriott1 and Jobran Chebib2 1University of Washington, Tacoma, WA, USA 98402 2University of Zurich,¨ Zurich,¨ Switzerland 8057 [email protected] Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/isal/proceedings-pdf/alif2016/28/298/1904330/978-0-262-33936-0-ch052.pdf by guest on 30 September 2021 Abstract mutual response of the individuals in the herd with no need for social awareness or exchange of information. Sexual reproductive behavior has a necessary social coordina- Prior work (from now on when we reference the prior tion component as willing and capable partners must both be work we mean the work in Marriott and Chebib (2015a,b)) in the right place at the right time. It has recently been demon- strated that many social organizations that support sexual re- showed that herding, philopatry, and assortative mating production can evolve in the absence of social coordination arose through non-social mechanisms of convergence and between agents (e.g. herding, assortative mating, and natal common descent. This work raised a few questions regard- philopatry). In this paper we explore these results by includ- ing the role that social interaction plays in many of these ob- ing social transfer mechanisms to our agents and contrasting served behaviors. These mating behaviors can be explained their reproductive behavior with a control group without so- cial transfer mechanisms. We conclude that similar behaviors by both non-social and social mechanisms. In many cases emerge in our social learning agents as those that emerged in the non-social solution is the simpler one, though it is likely the non-social learning agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Neural, Parallel, and Scientific Computations 25 (2017) 149-164 DYNAMICS of a SYMBIOTIC MODEL with HERD BEHAVIOUR and STRONG
    Neural, Parallel, and Scientific Computations 25 (2017) 149-164 DYNAMICS OF A SYMBIOTIC MODEL WITH HERD BEHAVIOUR AND STRONG ALLEE EFFECT PROSENJIT SEN, ALAKES MAITI, AND G. P. SAMANTA Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, Howrah - 711 103, India, E-mail: [email protected] Department of Mathematics, Vidyasagar Evening College, Kolkata – 700006, India, E-mail: alakesh [email protected] Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, Howrah - 711 103, India, E-mail: g p [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT. In this paper we will consider the Allee effect on a symbiotic population system with herd behaviour. Criteria for stability of equilibrium points are derived. The effect of discrete time-delay on the model is investigated. Computer simulation of various solutions is presented to illustrate our mathematical findings. The biological implications of our analytical and numerical findings are discussed critically. Key Words Symbiotic model, Herd, Allee effect, Stability, Time-delay. 1. INTRODUCTION Symbiotic relationship is a most widespread phenomenon that is very common in nature. In this relationship, the organisms live together and influence their mutual livelihoods. Symbiotic relationship may be obligate or facultative. In obligate sym- biosis, two organisms cannot survive without each other. In facultative symbiosis, the species live together by choice. So far as the growth of a single-species population is concerned, it has long been recognised that the famous logistic growth function is a logical choice. The function is introduced in 1838 by the Belgian mathematician Pierre Francois Verhulst [42] and later it is rediscovered in 1920 by American biologists Reymon Pearl and Lowell Reed [36].
    [Show full text]
  • Using a Novel Bio-Inspired Robotic Model to Study Artificial Evolution
    Using a Novel Bio-inspired Robotic Model to Study Artificial Evolution Yao Yao Promoter: Prof.Dr. Yves Van de Peer Ghent University (UGent)/Flanders Institute for Biotechnology (VIB) Faculty of Sciences UGent Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics VIB Department of Plant Systems Biology Bioinformatics & Evolutionary Genomics This work was supported by European Commission within the Work Program “Future and Emergent Technologies Proactive” under the grant agreement no. 216342 (Symbrion) and Ghent University (Multidisciplinary Research Partnership ‘Bioinformatics: from nucleotides to networks’. Dissertation submitted in fulfillment of the requirement of the degree: Doctor in Sciences, Bioinformatics. Academic year: 2014-2015 1 Yao,Y (2015) “Using a Novel Bio-inspired Robotic Model to Study Artificial Evolution”. PhD Thesis, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium The author and promoter give the authorization to consult and copy parts of this work for personal use only. Every other use is subject to the copyright laws. Permission to reproduce any material contained in this work should be obtained from the author. 2 Examination committee Prof. Dr. Wout Boerjan (chair) Faculty of Sciences, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University Prof. Dr. Yves Van de Peer (promoter) Faculty of Sciences, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University Prof. Dr. Kathleen Marchal* Faculty of Sciences, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University Prof. Dr. Tom Dhaene* Faculty
    [Show full text]
  • Simulated Evolution of Selfish Herd Behavior
    Simulated Evolution of Selfish Herd Behavior Timothy C. Reluga 1 [email protected] Department of Applied Mathematics University of Washington, Box 352420 Seattle, WA 98195-2420 Telephone: 206:543:0319 Steven Viscido Department of Biology University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195-2420 February 1, 2005 1Author to whom correspondence should be addressed Abstract Single species aggregations are a commonly observed phenomenon. One potential explanation for these aggregations is provided by the selfish herd hypothesis, which states that aggregations result from individual efforts to reduce personnel predation risk at the expense of group-mates. Not all movement rules based on the selfish herd hypothesis are consistent with observed animal behavior. Previous work has shown that herd-like aggregations are not generated by movement rules limited to local interactions between nearest neighbors. Instead, rules generating realistic herds appear to require delocalized interactions. To date, it has been an open question whether or not the necessary delocalization can emerge from local interactions under natural selection. To address this question, we study an individual-based model with a single quantitative genetic trait that controls the influence of neighbors as a function of distance. The results indicate that selection increases the influence of distant neighbors relative to near neighbors and support the idea that herd behavior can evolve from localized movement rules under predation pressure. Keywords: selfish herd, behavior, evolution, predation risk 1 Introduction Gregarious behavior occurs in animals across a wide variety of taxa, including invertebrates (Ritz, 1994), fish (Shaw, 1970), birds (Lack, 1968), wildebeests (Gueron and Levin, 1993), lions (Bertram, 1975), and primates (Nakagawa, 1990), among others.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries-Induced Selection Against Schooling Behaviour in Marine Fishes
    Fisheries-induced selection against royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rspb schooling behaviour in marine fishes Ana Sofia Guerra1, Albert B. Kao2,3, Douglas J. McCauley1 and Andrew M. Berdahl4 Research 1Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA 2Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Cite this article: Guerra AS, Kao AB, 3Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA 4 McCauley DJ, Berdahl AM. 2020 School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA Fisheries-induced selection against schooling ASG, 0000-0003-3030-9765; ABK, 0000-0001-8232-8365; DJM, 0000-0002-8100-653X; behaviour in marine fishes. Proc. R. Soc. B 287: AMB, 0000-0002-5057-0103 20201752. Group living is a common strategy used by fishes to improve their fitness. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1752 While sociality is associated with many benefits in natural environments, including predator avoidance, this behaviour may be maladaptive in the Anthropocene. Humans have become the dominant predator in many marine systems, with modern fishing gear developed to specifically target Received: 28 July 2020 groups of schooling species. Therefore, ironically, behavioural strategies Accepted: 3 September 2020 which evolved to avoid non-human predators may now actually make certain fish more vulnerable to predation by humans. Here, we use an individual-based model to explore the evolution of fish schooling behaviour in a range of environments, including natural and human-dominated preda- tion conditions. In our model, individual fish may leave or join groups Subject Category: depending on their group-size preferences, but their experienced group Behaviour size is also a function of the preferences of others in the population.
    [Show full text]