DOCSLIB.ORG

Nb100506exa Bideford Long Bridge Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nb100506exa Bideford Long Bridge Consultation EEC/06/55/HQ Executive 19 June 2006 Bideford Long Bridge: Results of Consultation and Formal Scheme Approval Report of the Director of Environment, Economy and Culture Please note that the following recommendations are subject to consideration and determination by the Executive (and confirmation under the provisions of the Council’s Constitution) before taking effect. Recommendation: It is recommended that: (a) Executive notes Devon County Council’s obligation to protect the Bideford Longbridge as a Grade One listed structure and that action needs to be taken to ensure its continued safety; (b) the record of long and extensive public consultation be noted; (c) Executive approves the design and construction of a scheme based on Option One, estimated cost £6.5 million, as the solution to securing the long term safety of Bideford Long Bridge. 1. Summary This paper reports on the outcome of the recent public consultation undertaken, and on the two viable options put forward to strengthen the Bideford Longbridge. Feedback from the consultation is presented and discussed. 2. Background Bideford’s Longbridge is protected as a Grade 1 Listed Structure and the County Council as Highway Authority has an ongoing responsibility to maintain and preserve it. The historic 13 th century masonry arches of the bridge are in a satisfactory condition. However, due to the condition and inherent weakness of the concrete widened sections of the bridge which carry the road and footways, a 3 tonne weight restriction was introduced in 2002. A detailed investigation into the condition of the 1920s concrete and steel cantilevers was carried out in September 2005. The results indicated that generally the underlying steel is inadequately protected, due to insufficient concrete depth. There is clear potential for ongoing corrosion of the steel reinforcement and steel beams because of this, high levels of chloride contamination, and carbonation of the concrete. This situation exists in addition to the significant visible areas where concrete has cracked and spalled. Repairs to the existing fabric of the bridge are unlikely to be effective. Guarantees from specialist contractors for their effectiveness are available for only up to approximately 15 years. An option to repair the bridge can only be seen as a short term solution and is unlikely to be value for money due to the extensive areas requiring repair and protection. This involves significant investment on a regular basis over the whole life of the structure, the cost of which would have to be found from County Council resources. Repairing the weak areas of the bridge is considered not to be practicable or cost effective in the long term and would not strengthen the structure to be capable of carrying current traffic loading. There are concerns that if the condition of the bridge is allowed to deteriorate, it will be necessary at some stage, to restrict access further or close the bridge in order to protect the safety of the public. The outcome of a consultation process undertaken in June 2003 regarding the bridge’s future, was presented to Executive on 15 July 2003, and it was resolved that further discussions take place with English Heritage and other key stakeholders and that the conclusions of those discussions be reported to a future meeting (Minute *496 refers). As a result, a wide ranging consultation process has recently taken place, and a further public exhibition held which canvassed the views on two options considered viable to strengthen the bridge. This report details the results of discussions and summarises the findings of the recent public consultation. 3. The Consultation Process Details of the consultation process undertaken in June 2003 where a total of nine options were considered was presented in a report to Executive on 15 July 2003. This is reproduced as Appendix I of this report. The consultation engaged all Bideford Town Councillors, and County and District Councillors from Torridge and North Devon representing Bideford and the adjacent communities. This was followed by a three-day public exhibition held in Bideford. As a result of the feedback received from this process a recommendation was adopted by Executive to undertake further discussions with key stakeholders and that the conclusions be reported to a future meeting. Further consultations have since taken place culminating in a public consultation and exhibition held during March and April of this year. A Working Group, established in July 2004, consisting of Members and officers from Devon County, Torridge District and Bideford Town Councils has discussed the consultation process in detail. Details of those involved in the Group are included in Appendix II of this report. The Group met on a total of six occasions to review options for the bridge’s future, agree viable options to strengthen the bridge, and to establish the process for a wider consultation with both the public and other key stakeholders. A representative from English Heritage attended one meeting at the invitation of the Group. The Working Group came to a consensus that there are now only two viable options to strengthen the bridge. These options, which were subsequently illustrated and explained in the consultation leaflet (Appendix III) and at the public exhibition, were: Option One Replace weak areas of concrete on the bridge using a similar combination of steel and concrete which would preserve the Grade One listed structure more or less in its present form and appearance. Option Two Remove the weak concrete walkways and reinstate the bridge parapets closer to the original line, to expose more of the original historic masonry arches. Walkers and cyclists would be provided with separate safer access using lightweight stainless steel walkways designed to be as visually unobtrusive as possible. The Working Group discussed, edited and agreed the content of a consultation leaflet developed by officers from the County Council and also agreed on the wider consultation process to be followed. The agreed consultation leaflet is included in Appendix III of this report. This consultation process consisted of: • The distribution of 10,000 leaflets to households in the Bideford area explaining the options for strengthening the bridge. • A preview exhibition held for Members of Torridge District, Bideford Town and local County Council Members on 26 March 2006. • A week long public exhibition from 27 March to 1 April 2006 held at two locations in Bideford and East the Water. • Seeking the views of key stakeholder organisations (19 in total). • Making detailed information available on the County Council’s website. • Publication of articles and features regarding the exhibition and consultation process through the press, local radio and television. • A presentation made to a public meeting convened by Torridge District Council and attended by Bideford Town and Devon County Council Members. 4. The 2006 Consultation Feedback A total of 445 responses had been received via a combination of returns of the consultation leaflet tear off slips, letters, and e-mail responses, by 18 April 2006. The breakdown of preferences for each option was as follows: Number % Supporting Option One (Strengthen as existing) 192 43.0% Option Two (Strengthen with new walkways) 242 54.5% Other 11 2.5% TOTAL 445 100% The main themes of written comments received were: 85 responses preferred the appearance of the existing bridge (Option 1). 47 responses asked for the existing weight restriction to be retained in any event. 44 responses considered that Option 2 offered safety benefits for pedestrians and cyclists. 27 responses felt that Option 2 would increase the exposure of pedestrians and cyclists to the elements. 19 responses preferred the appearance of the Option 2. Nineteen key stakeholder organisations having a potential interest in the future of the Longbridge were approached directly seeking their views. Responses were received from eight organisations - two expressing a preference for Option One, two expressing a preference for Option Two, and four giving no indication of preference. The full list of those consulted is included in Appendix II of this report. The views of both Torridge District and Bideford Town Councils have been received following the recent consultations. A public meeting was convened by Torridge District Council and attended by Bideford Town and County Council Members on 3 May 2006. Devon County Council officers made a presentation regarding the options under consideration. Following that meeting on 3 May 2006: Torridge District Council resolved: "that the County Council be advised that this Authority support Option 1 detailed in the consultation process, being the strengthening of the existing bridge keeping the appearances as at present" "before a decision is taken by the Devon County Council we ask for an unbiased mail shot to every house in Bideford with a prepaid envelope for reply" "that the Council are implacably opposed to Option 2" (A copy is attached at Appendix IV.) Bideford Town Council resolved: 1. That this Council calls on Devon County Council to consider more carefully the option of repairing the existing structure. 2. Before any of the decisions on major works are taken by Devon County Council, we ask for an unbiased mail shot to every house in Bideford with a prepaid envelope for reply. 3. Meanwhile, this Council is implacably opposed to Option 2. The Bideford Regeneration Initiative have also responded but have expressed no view, requesting that Devon County Council works with them to "obtain the right result for Bideford" and a wish to remain involved in the ongoing consultation exercise surrounding the Bideford Long Bridge. A copy of the response is attached at Appendix V. 5. English Heritage Given the Grade One Listed status of the Longbridge, English Heritage have a significant role in advising on what works or alterations will be permitted to be undertaken. Throughout all consultation processes undertaken so far, the views of English Heritage have been sought and taken into consideration.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historical Notes Relating to Bideford's East-The-Water Shore.Odt
    Historical Notes relating to Bideford's East-the-Water Shore A collection, in time-line form, of information pertaining primarily to the East-the-Water shore. Table of Contents Introduction....................................................................................................................................13 Nature of this document.............................................................................................................13 Development of this document...................................................................................................13 Prior to written records...................................................................................................................13 Prehistory...................................................................................................................................13 Stone Age, flint tools and Eastridge enclosure............................................................................14 Roman period, tin roads, transit camps, and the ford..................................................................15 A Roman transit camp between two crossings.......................................................................15 An ancient tin route?.............................................................................................................15 The old ford...........................................................................................................................15 Saxon period, fisheries (monks and forts?).................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Identification of Wintering Wildfowl High Tide Roosts And
    nhbm Identification of Wintering Wildfowl High Tide Roosts & Recreational Disturbance Impacts on the Taw Torridge Estuary The Skern wader and wildfowl roost gathers on the flooding tide with an angler on Grey Sand Hill ECON Ecological Consultancy Limited Unit 7, The Octagon Business Park, Little Plumstead, Norwich, Norfolk NR13 5FH Registered in England & Wales Company No. 6457758. Director: Dr Martin Perrow BSc, PhD, MIEEM, MIFM, CEnv C0mpany Secretary: Eleanor Skeate BSc Final Report © Natural England Prepared by: Richard Berridge ECON, Ecological Consultancy limited Unit 7, The Octagon Business Park Little Plumstead Norwich NR13 5FH Prepared for: Natural England RSPB North Devon Council Torridge District Council North Devon AONB Project Manager: Clare Guthrie Lead Adviser Devon, Cornwall, Isles of Scilly Area Team Natural England Exeter Version Authors Amendments Checked by Date Draft Richard Berridge 15/03/2019 Incorporation of comments Final Richard Berridge Dr Martin Perrow 10/05/2019 from project partners Contents Page 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Study area and project background .......................................................................... 1 Recreation and conservation ................................................................................................ 3 Disturbance of birds .............................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Project
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Notes Relating to Bideford's East-The-Water Shore Volume 3 (20Th C
    Historical Notes relating to Bideford's East-the-Water Shore Volume 3 (20th C. to present) R. I. Kirby Last updated 27 Apr 2021 (DRAFT) Page 1 of 38 © R I Kirby Historical Notes relating to Bideford's East-the-Water Shore (Volume 3) Contents of the volumes The contents of the three volumes are as follows: • Volume 1, Introductory material and Pre-history to 18th C. • Volume 2, 19th C. • Volume 3, 20th C. to present. Last updated 27 Apr 2021 Page 2 of 38 © R I Kirby Historical Notes relating to Bideford's East-the-Water Shore (Volume 3) Table of Contents Contents of the volumes.......................................................................................................................2 Introduction to Part 3............................................................................................................................6 20th Century..........................................................................................................................................6 1900, the foreshore not as it ought to be..........................................................................................6 1900, bullocks run amok on Steamer Wharf...................................................................................6 1901, draining East-the-Water and ornamental sewer vents............................................................6 1901, two of Baker’s boats get swept under the bridge...................................................................7 1902, Bideford celebrates the end of the Boer War.........................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Torridge District Council Harbour Board Meeting
    1 TORRIDGE DISTRICT COUNCIL HARBOUR BOARD MEETING Town Hall - Bridge Street, Bideford, EX39 2HS Thursday, 9 August 2018 - 10.30 am PRESENT Councillor Christie, Vice Chair, in the absence of the Chair took the Chair. Councillors J Langton-Lockton, T Johns, A Eastman (substitute for Councillor Whittaker) and D Hurley Independent Members: Mr N Hardaker and Mr T Gibbs ALSO PRESENT S Kearney - Planning & Economy Manager P Labistour - Harbour Master S Cawsey - Democratic Services Officer 1 Member of the Public (Mr Renton) The Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting. 13. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence were received from Councillor Whittaker and Councillor Langmead. 14. MINUTES It was proposed by Councillor Christie, seconded by Mr T Gibbs and – Resolved: That the minutes of the meeting held on the 17 May 2018 be agreed and signed as a correct record. Vote: (For 6, Abstentions 1) Matters Arising: Minute No 2 - Minutes Minute No. 31 - The Group were informed that the Pilot, Captain Paul Brown, had now returned to work following his accident and will look to authorise him in September. 2 Minute 5 - A follow up meeting of the Devon Marine Pioneer Programme had been scheduled to take place on 17 September 2018 at Ilfracombe. Anyone wishing to attend to contact the Harbour Master or Democratic Services. 15. ACTION LIST The Action List was reviewed and updated. 16. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS There were no public contributions. 17. AGREEMENT OF AGENDA ITEMS PARTS I AND II There were no Part II items. 18. URGENT MATTERS OF INFORMATION BROUGHT FORWARD WITH THE PERMISSION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE COMMITEE There were no urgent matters brought forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Tolchards Devon Cricket League the Management Team – 2020
    Devon Cricket League Devon Cricket League Cricket Devon Tolchards 2017 TolchardsDevon Cricket League Devon Cricket at League 201 2020 9 16 North Street, Taunton, TA1 1LJ. Tel. 01823 333152 Castle Square House, 17 Castle Street, Exeter, EX4 3PU. Tel. 01392 666590 52-54 Cornwall Street, Plymouth, PL1 1LR. Tel. 01752 661981 82 Lemon Street, Truro, TR1 2QA. Tel. 01872 272264 www.michaelspiers.co.uk County 100 Premier League County 100 Premier League wwwdevoncricket.co.uk www.devoncricket.co.uk www.devoncl.play-cricket.com 13750 - Devon Cricket Handbook 2017 - cover.indd 1 25/03/2017 17:47:40 Front cover.indd 1 21/01/2014 14:00:56Front cover.indd 1 21/01/2014 14:00:56 The Devon League Executive Committee would like to thank our main sponsors, and ask all clubs to support our sponsors where possible 2 THE DEVON CRICKET LEAGUE – 2020 Please support your Generous Sponsors and Advertisers when possible. List of Advertisers BDS Solutions ................................................................................................................. 126 BHGS (Monro) .................................................................................................................225 David Shepherd Cricket Trust .......................................................................................233 Devon Cricket Board ........................................................................................................ 13 Devon County Cricket Club ..........................................................................................226 Exclusive
    [Show full text]
  • Sanitary Survey - Review
    Sanitary Survey - Review Taw/Torridge Estuary – 2021 Document No. – J0591/20/06/23 Carcinus Ltd, Wessex House, Upper Market Street, Eastleigh, Hampshire, SO50 9FD. Tel. 023 8129 0095 https://www.carcinus.co.uk/ Cover image: Mouth of the Taw/Torridge Estuary, © Phillip Halling, CC-BY-SA Page | i Carcinus Ltd – Document Control Sheet Client Food Standards Agency (FSA) Project Title Sanitary Survey Review Document Title Review of the sanitary survey of Taw/Torridge Estuary Document Number J0591/20/06/23 Revision 4.2 Date 20 January 2021 Revisions Revision No. Date Comment 1.2 2nd Oct 2020 Draft for Carcinus Review 2.0 23rd Oct 2020 Draft for Food Standards Agency Review 3.1 4th November 2020 Draft for external consultation 4.2 20th January 2021 Final report post-consultation Document QA and Approval Name Role Date Author Joshua Baker Freshwater and Marine 20th January 2021 Ecologist Checked Despina Crabb Administrator & Quality 19th Oct 2020 Assurance Matthew Crabb 20th January 2021 Director Approved Matthew Crabb Director 20th January 2021 Initial Consultation Consultee Date of consultation Date of response North Devon District Council 18 June 2020 30 June 2020 Torridge District Council 18 June 2020 18 June 2020 Environment Agency 18 June 2020 27 June 2020 Consultation on draft report Consultee Date of consultation Date of response Devon and Severn IFCA 09 November 2020 07 December 2020 North Devon Council 09 November 2020 07 December 2020 Page | ii A sanitary survey relevant to the bivalve mollusc beds in Taw/Torridge Estuary was undertaken in 2013 in accordance with Regulation (EC) 854/2004 (which was replaced by retained EU Law Regulation (EU) 2017/625, which sanitary survey requirements now specified in retained EU Law Regulation 2019/627).
    [Show full text]
  • Highways Agency
    DEVON COUNTY COUNCIL NORTH DEVON TRANSPORT MODEL LOCAL MODEL VALIDATION REPORT OCTOBER 2015 CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Model Specification 1 2. NETWORKS 2 2.1 Highway Network 2 2.2 SATURN Coding 3 3. CALIBRATION & VALIDATION DATA 8 3.1 Traffic Growth 8 3.2 Traffic Counts 9 3.3 Journey Time Data 11 4. TRIP MATRICES 13 4.1 Highway Matrix Building Procedure 13 4.2 Car Trip Ends 13 4.3 Car Distribution 14 4.4 Matrix Building 18 4.5 Matrix Estimation 21 5. TRAFFIC MODEL CALIBRATION 27 5.1 Procedure 27 5.2 Highway Network 27 5.3 Traffic Assignment 30 5.4 Generalised Costs 30 5.5 Model Convergence 31 6. TRAFFIC MODEL VALIDATION 32 6.1 Validation Criteria & Acceptability Guidelines 32 6.2 Network Validation 33 6.3 Journey Time Validation 34 6.4 Validation at A361 Portmore RSI Site 36 6.5 Traffic Flow Validation 38 7. SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS 39 TABLES Table 1: SATURN Junction Simulation Parameters for Extended Network ........................................... 3 Table 2: Traffic Growth ............................................................................................................................ 8 Table 3: Details of Traffic Counts ............................................................................................................ 9 Table 4: Average Journey Times .......................................................................................................... 11 Table 5: Model Time Period Factors ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • College Park
    How to get there K I N G From Cornwall : S L E Y R By road follow the A39 towards O A D Bideford, go straight across the roundabout signposted Abbotsham / Atlantic Village following the signs for College Park. A39 From M5: ABBOTSHAM ROAD OLD BIDEF ORD BR By road exit at junction 27 IDGE following the A361 to Barnstaple, approching Barnstaple turn left T E E R at the roundabout following A39 T S BIDEFORD N O to Bidford, after going across the T G N I R Torridge Bridge go across the A386 R O T first roundabout then follow the AD D RO A Y O College Park signs. L R L E V W O L E C N COLLEGE PARK BIDEFORD ONE CALL: 01237 238012 ONE CLICK : REDROW.CO.UK BARNSTAPLE A361 College Park, A3125 Abbotsham Road, Bideford, Devon, EX39 3PE A377 A39 Property Misdescriptions Act 1991 In accordance with the Property Misdescriptions Act 1991, the information contained in this A39 document is provided for general guidelines only, and does not form the whole or any part of BIDEFORD any offer or contract. These particulars should not be relied upon as accurately describing any A386 of the specific matters described by any order under the Property Misdescriptions Act 1991. Customers are strongly advised to contact a Redrow Homes representative for further details and to satisfy themselves as to their accuracy. All information and computer representations contained in this document are taken from design intent material and may be subject to further design development. The dimensions A388 given in the brochure are approximate.
    [Show full text]
  • Document-0.Pdf
    Meadow Rise Handcrafted by Pearce Homes that have over 70 years of building the finest quality homes across the region, Meadow Rise proudly sits within this secluded spot of Northam, within a stones through to the heart of the village and the stunning coastline. This exclusive development of only six executive homes, have all been individually designed to suit their location on the development and individual plot, with no detail having been over looked. Offering a mixture of houses and bungalows with all designs offering ‘one level living’. Northam and the surrounding area: Just a brief walk takes you into the heart of the The Village of Appledore just over 1 mile away by village of Northam that is well served by a range of car, or a delightful walk down the South West Coastal amenities including a frequent and well used bus path, is located on the west bank of the tidal River service that offers access to Barnstaple and beyond, Torridge. The Quay is very central to life in the village a doctor’s surgery, dentist, Torridge Leisure Centre and it is here you will find many activities including and library. Within the heart of the village is the fishing trips, crabbing contests and sometimes Morris popular pub, supermarket, hair stylists, restaurants Dancers. Enjoy a glass of wine quayside, followed by and take away to name but a few. scrummy fish and chips. This quaint fishing village has a maze of narrow streets leading to the quay. The seaside resort of Westward Ho! boasts golden sands that stretch over 2 miles towards the mouth of Bideford is a thriving shopping centre with a Pannier the Taw and Torridge rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • County Road Highway Maintenance Capital Budget: Progress on 2017/18 Schemes and Proposals for the 2018/19 Programmes
    HIW/18/20 Cabinet 11 April 2018 County Road Highway Maintenance Capital Budget: Progress on 2017/18 Schemes and Proposals for the 2018/19 Programmes Report of the Chief Officer for Highways, Infrastructure Development and Waste Recommendations: That (a) Progress on 2017/18 capital funded highway maintenance schemes detailed in Appendices I and II to this report be noted; (b) The capital funded highway maintenance programmes for 2018/19 as set out in Appendices III and IV be approved; (c) Detailed allocation of the available budget be determined by the Chief Officer for Highways, Infrastructure Development and Waste on the basis of the Highways Infrastructure Asset Management Plan, and within the limits of the approved budget; (d) The 2018/19 Highways, Infrastructure, Development and Waste capital programme is increased by £2,237,308, funded by external grants. This is additional Pothole Action Fund grant that was awarded by the Department for Transport in February 2018. 1. Summary This report presents information on the programmes and schemes of highway capital maintenance work delivered in 2017/18. It presents the latest network condition information and key performance indicator data, which measures performance against the levels of service agreed in Devon’s Highway Infrastructure Asset Management Plan (HIAMP). Road Condition Trend Data demonstrates the effective use of the available funding and the benefits of using the Devon Highway Infrastructure Asset Management Plan in investment decision making. Government has decided its formulae for the allocation of highway capital maintenance funds, which includes a Needs Allocation, an Incentive Fund, a Challenge Fund, a Pothole Action Fund and the allocations to Devon are conveyed in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • HSM) Programme & Additional Capital Funding - 2014 / 2015
    Highway Structural Maintenance (HSM) Programme & Additional Capital Funding - 2014 / 2015 £3,880,000 Bridge Assessment & Strengthening (BAS) 2014 / 2015 - Not Included Estimated Values based on 12/08/14 Data and therefore subject to change 2014 / 2015 Revenue Funding - Not Included £2,563,463 Capital Funding from £6.9M Severe Weather Grant - Planned for 2015 / 2016 to be spent on Surface Dressing Pre-Patching for 2016 / 2017 Schemes that cross multiple boundaries only recognise one boundary GLOSSARY Resurfacing - surface treatment with a bituminous material, 40mm or more thick Patching - surface treatment with a bituminous material, 40mm or more thick but in smaller areas not covering the whole road or footpath. Surface dressing - surface treatment with bitumen and chippings Pre surface dressing patching - surface treatment with a bituminous material, 40mm or more thick but in smaller areas not covering the whole road or footpath, completed in the year preceding surface dressing. Joint / crack repair – treatment joints and cracks in the existing surface that need sealing prior to a longer term repair in the near future. HFS or high friction surfacing – specialised surface dressing at locations that require higher skidding resistance SCRIM remedial works – surface treatment at sites which require an improvement to the skidding resistance Drainage – upgrading, repairs and improvements to highway drainage systems Footway works – surface treatment to a footpath involving resurfacing or a bituminous sealant, or replacement of concrete
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Cabinet, 11/04/2018 10:30
    Phil Norrey Chief Executive To: The Chair and Members of the County Hall Cabinet Topsham Road Exeter Devon EX2 4QD (See below) Your ref : Date : 3 April 2018 Email: [email protected] Our ref : Please ask for : Karen Strahan, 01392 382264 : CABINET Wednesday, 11th April, 2018 A meeting of the Cabinet is to be held on the above date at 10.30 am in the Committee Suite - County Hall to consider the following matters. P NORREY Chief Executive A G E N D A PART I - OPEN COMMITTEE 1 Apologies for Absence 2 Minutes Minutes of the meeting held on 14 March 2018, (previously circulated). 3 Items Requiring Urgent Attention Items which in the opinion of the Chair should be considered at the meeting as matters of urgency. 4 Announcements 5 Petitions 6 Question(s) from Members of the Council FRAMEWORK DECISION NIL KEY DECISIONS 7 Transport Capital Programme 2018/19: Proposed Allocation (Pages 1 - 12) Report of the Head of Planning, Transportation and Environment (PTE/18/17) on the proposed allocations for the Transport Capital Programme for 2018/19, attached. Electoral Divisions(s): All Divisions 8 Department for Transport Consultation on the use of section 19 and section 22 permits for road passenger transport in Great Britain (Community Transport) (Pages 13 - 18) Report of the Head of Planning, Transportation and Environment (PTE/18/18) outlining a proposed response to the Department for Transport Consultation on the use of section 19 and section 22 permits for road passenger transport in Great Britain, attached. Electoral Divisions(s): All Divisions 9 County Road Highway Maintenance Capital Budget: Progress on 2017/2018 Schemes and Proposals for the 2018/2019 Schemes (Pages 19 - 48) Report of the Chief Officer for Highways, Infrastructure Development and Waste (HIW/18/20) on the County Road Highway Maintenance Capital Budget, outlining progress on the 2017/2018 Schemes and the proposals for 2018/2019, attached.
    [Show full text]