2014 Annual Monitoring Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2014 Annual Monitoring Report City of Morro Bay and Cayucos Sanitary District OFFSHORE MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 2014 ANNUAL REPORT Estero Bay Marine Research Pt.Specialists Arguello Pt. Buchon 3140 Telegraph Rd., Suite A Ventura, California 93003 Report to the City of Morro Bay and Cayucos Sanitary District 955 Shasta Avenue Morro Bay, California 93442 (805) 772-6272 OFFSHORE MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 2014 ANNUAL REPORT Prepared by Bonnie Luke and Douglas A. Coats (Marine Research Specialists) and Bruce Keogh (City of Morro Bay Wastewater Treatment Plant Division Manager) Submitted by Marine Research Specialists 3140 Telegraph Rd., Suite A Ventura, California 93003 Telephone: (805) 644-1180 Telefax: (805) 289-3935 E-mail: [email protected] March 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................................... ix EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 REPORT ORGANIZATION ............................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 TREATMENT PLANT PERFORMANCE ..................................................................... 2-1 2.1 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT ........................................................................... 2-2 2.1.1 Operations ................................................................................................................ 2-3 2.1.2 Plant History ............................................................................................................ 2-6 2.1.3 Regulatory Setting ................................................................................................. 2-10 2.1.4 Description of the Treatment and Outfall System .............................................. 2-12 2.1.5 Pollution Prevention Program ............................................................................. 2-14 Industrial Waste Survey ..................................................................................... 2-14 Public Outreach .................................................................................................. 2-15 Source Identification .......................................................................................... 2-17 2.2 WASTEWATER CHARACTERIZATION ....................................................................... 2-18 2.2.1 Flow Rate ............................................................................................................... 2-19 2.2.2 Suspended Solids, Turbidity, and Settleable Solids ........................................... 2-20 2.2.3 Biochemical Oxygen Demand ............................................................................... 2-23 2.2.4 Oil and Grease ....................................................................................................... 2-24 2.2.5 pH ........................................................................................................................... 2-25 2.2.6 Temperature .......................................................................................................... 2-25 2.2.7 Ammonia ................................................................................................................ 2-26 2.2.8 Residual Chlorine .................................................................................................. 2-26 2.2.9 Coliform Bacteria .................................................................................................. 2-27 2.2.10 Toxicity ................................................................................................................... 2-28 2.2.11 Nutrients ................................................................................................................. 2-29 2.2.12 Chemical Compounds ........................................................................................... 2-30 Trace Metals ....................................................................................................... 2-32 Arsenic and Selenium ......................................................................................... 2-32 Radionuclides ..................................................................................................... 2-32 Phenolic Compounds .......................................................................................... 2-33 Cyanide ............................................................................................................... 2-33 Dioxin ................................................................................................................. 2-33 2.3 BIOSOLIDS ................................................................................................................. 2-33 2.3.1 Solids Treatment Process ...................................................................................... 2-34 2.3.2 Chemical Compounds ........................................................................................... 2-35 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page 3.0 RECEIVING WATER QUALITY ................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 MONITORING PROGRAM ............................................................................................ 3-1 3.1.1 Objectives of Sampling ........................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Scope of Monitoring ................................................................................................ 3-2 3.1.3 Sampling Station Design ......................................................................................... 3-4 3.1.4 Navigation ................................................................................................................ 3-7 3.1.5 Sampling Equipment and Methodology ................................................................ 3-8 Auxiliary Measurements ...................................................................................... 3-8 Instrumental Measurements .................................................................................. 3-8 3.2 PLUME DISPERSION .................................................................................................. 3-10 3.2.1 Zone of Initial Dilution.......................................................................................... 3-11 3.2.2 Critical Initial Dilution Ratio ............................................................................... 3-12 3.2.3 Regional Oceanographic Processes ...................................................................... 3-13 3.2.4 Ambient Seawater Properties ............................................................................... 3-16 3.3 COMPLIANCE EVALUATION ...................................................................................... 3-19 3.3.1 Screening for Applicability ................................................................................... 3-20 Measurement Location ....................................................................................... 3-20 Presence of Wastewater Constituents ................................................................. 3-21 Natural Variation ................................................................................................ 3-22 3.3.2 Numerical Limits ................................................................................................... 3-23 COP Objectives .................................................................................................. 3-23 Basin Plan Limits ............................................................................................... 3-24 3.3.3 Other Lines of Evidence ........................................................................................ 3-25 Mixing Performance ........................................................................................... 3-26 Effluent Quality .................................................................................................. 3-27 Entrainment Signature ........................................................................................ 3-28 3.3.4 Visual Observations .............................................................................................. 3-29 3.4 BENEFICIAL USE ....................................................................................................... 3-29 4.0 MARINE SEDIMENTS AND BENTHIC BIOTA .......................................................... 4-1 4.1 MONITORING PROGRAM ............................................................................................ 4-1 4.1.1 Scope of Monitoring ................................................................................................ 4-1 4.1.2 Sampling Station Design ......................................................................................... 4-3 4.1.3 Benthic Sample Collection and Processing ........................................................... 4-4 Equipment ...........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Adelaide (Ire)
    NORTHERN DANCER SADLER'S WELLS (CAN) (USA) FAIRY BRIDGE (USA) GALILEO (IRE) MISWAKI (USA) URBAN SEA (USA) ADELAIDE (IRE) ALLEGRETTA (GB) (2011) A BAY HORSE DANZIG (USA) ELNADIM (USA) ELLE SEULE (USA) ELLETELLE (IRE) (2005) NINISKI (USA) FLAMANDA (GB) NEMESIA (IRE) ADELAIDE (IRE), Jt 4th top rated 3yr old colt in Ireland in 2014, won 4 races at 2 to 3 years and £1,481,742 including Secretariat Stakes, Arlington, Gr.1, Cox Plate, Moonee Valley, Gr.1, Airlie Stud Gallinule Stakes, Curragh, Gr.3, placed 4 times viz second in Belmont Derby Invitational Stakes, Belmont Park, Gr.1, King Edward VII Stakes, Ascot, Gr.2, Prix Hocquart, Longchamp, Gr.2, third in Prix Niel, Longchamp, Gr.2. Sire; Own brother to Puissant (IRE). 1st Dam ELLETELLE (IRE) (by Elnadim (USA)), won 3 races at 2 to 3 years and £121,582 including Queen Mary Stakes, Ascot, Gr.2, Irish Stallion Farms E.B.F. Sweet Mimosa Stakes, Curragh, L., placed 5 times including third in Independent Waterford Wedgwood Phoenix Stakes, Curragh, Gr.1, Irish Thoroughbred Marketing Cherry Hinton Stakes, Newmarket, Gr.2, Belgrave Stakes, Fairyhouse, L. Dam of two foals, two winners viz: ADELAIDE (IRE) (2011 c. by Galileo (IRE)), See above. Puissant (IRE) (2012 g. by Galileo (IRE)), won 1 race at 2 years and £18,500, placed 4 times including third in Prix du Point du Jour, Craon, L. 2nd Dam FLAMANDA (GB) (by Niniski (USA)), won 5 races at 4 years and £16,438, placed 7 times. Dam of nine winners including: ELLETELLE (IRE) (f. by Elnadim (USA)), See above.
    [Show full text]
  • Remus De La Tour Berinsa Stormy River Calithea
    N.2019 BERINSA F.2019 BAI Edition du 05/03/2019 Page N° 001 Chev_Win © 2016 T.F.Informatique ZEDDAAN (GB) KALAMOUN (GB) KHAIRUNISSA (GB) KENMARE (FR) MILESIAN (GB) BELLE OF IRELAND BELLE OF THE BALL HIGHEST HONOR (FR NEVER BEND (USA) RIVERMAN (USA) RIVER LADY (USA) HIGH RIVER (FR) SIR GAYLORD (USA) HAIRBRUSH (USA) BUG BRUSH (USA) VERGLAS (IRE) NEARCTIC NORTHERN DANCER ( NATALMA SECRETO (USA) SECRETARIAT (USA) BETTY'S SECRET (U BETTY LORAINE (US RAHAAM (USA) RAISE A NATIVE (U MR PROSPECTOR (US GOLD DIGGER (USA) FAGER'S GLORY (US DR. FAGER (USA) STREET'S GLORY (U NATIVE STREET (US NEVER BEND (USA) STORMY RIVER RIVERMAN (USA) RIVER LADY (USA) IRISH RIVER (FR) KLAIRON (FR) IRISH STAR (FR) BOTANY BAY (FR) RIVER MIST (USA) NORTHERN DANCER ( VICEREGAL (CAN) VICTORIA REGINA ( PRINCIPLE (CAN) QUEEN'S OWN (FR) QUEEN'S LAW (USA) QUEEN'S STATUTE ( MISS BIO (FR) NORTHERN DANCER ( LYPHARD (USA) GOOFED VACARME (USA) SODIUM (IRE) VIRUNGA (FR) VALE (FR) RIVER SANS RETOUR SIR GAYLORD (USA) SIR IVOR (USA) ATTICA (USA) RIVERSTAR (FR) SHESHOON (GB) RIVERSIDE (GB) RENOUNCE (GB) NEARCTIC REMUS DE LA TOUR NORTHERN DANCER ( NATALMA TRY MY BEST (USA) BUCKPASSER (USA) SEX APPEAL (USA) BEST IN SHOW (USA LAST TYCOON (IRE) NEVER BEND (USA) MILL REEF (USA) MILAN MILL (USA) MILL PRINCESS (IR SAYAJIRAO (GB) IRISH LASS (GB) SCOLLATA MARJU (IRE) PRINCEQUILLO (GB) ROUND TABLE (USA) KNIGHT'S DAUGHTER ARTAIUS (USA) MY BABU (FR) STYLISH PATTERN ( SUNSET GUN (GB) FLAME OF TARA (IR TUDOR MELODY (GB) WELSH PAGEANT (FR PICTURE LIGHT (FR WELSH FLAME (IRE) CREPELLO (GB) ELECTRIC FLASH (G LIGHTNING (GB) CALITHEA DANZIG (USA) CHIEF'S CROWN (US BOLD RULER (USA) SECRETARIAT (USA) SOMETHINGROYAL (U SIX CROWNS (USA) SWOON'S SON (USA) CHRIS EVERT (USA) MISS CARMIE (USA) QUEEN CAROLINE (U NATIVE DANCER (US RAISE A NATIVE (U RAISE YOU (USA) MR PROSPECTOR (US NASHUA (USA) GOLD DIGGER (USA) SEQUENCE (USA) FAGER'S GLORY (US ROUGH'N TUMBLE (F DR.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Duck Curriculum Revised
    Sea Ducks of Alaska Activity Guide Acknowledgments Contact Information: Project Coordinator: Marilyn Sigman, Center for Alaskan Coastal Studies Education: Written By: Sea Duck Activity Guide, Teaching Kit and Display: Elizabeth Trowbridge, Center for Alaskan Coastal Marilyn Sigman Center for Alaskan Coastal Studies Studies P.O. Box 2225 Homer, AK 99603 Illustrations by: (907) 235-6667 Bill Kitzmiller, Conrad Field and Fineline Graphics [email protected] (Alaska Wildlife Curriculum Illustrations), Elizabeth Alaska Wildlife Curricula Trowbridge Robin Dublin Wildlife Education Coordinator Reviewers: Alaska Dept. of Fish & Game Marilyn Sigman, Bree Murphy, Lisa Ellington, Tim Division of Wildlife Conservation Bowman, Tom Rothe 333 Raspberry Rd. Anchorage, AK 99518-1599 (907)267-2168 Funded By: [email protected] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Alaska Coastal Program and Scientific/technical Information: The Alaska Department of Fish and Game, State Duck Tim Bowman Stamp Program Sea Duck Joint Venture Coordinator (Pacific) The Center for Alaskan Coastal Studies would like to thank U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service the following people for their time and commitment to sea 1011 E. Tudor Rd. duck education: Tim Bowman, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Anchorage, AK 99503 Service, Sea Duck Joint Venture Project, for providing (907) 786-3569 background technical information, photographs and [email protected] support for this activity guide and the sea duck traveling SEADUCKJV.ORG display; Tom Rothe and Dan Rosenberg of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game for technical information, Tom Rothe presentations and photographs for both the sea duck Waterfowl Coordinator traveling display and the activity guide species identifica- Alaska Dept. of Fish & Game tion cards; John DeLapp, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • KINGSLEY KICKBACK Send To: [email protected] Frankly -- It’S a Matter of Or Opinion Kingsley Klarion, Kingsley Park, Park Lane, Middleham, DL8 4QZ
    pedestrians, he was tailed-off after a furlong, poleaxed a spectator and fired The Klarion welcomes your letters his jockey into the ground. KINGSLEY KICKBACK Send to: [email protected] Frankly -- it’s a matter of or opinion Kingsley Klarion, Kingsley Park, Park Lane, Middleham, DL8 4QZ. Was Frankel really the traditions of the 'latest is the greatest'. his standard on a foreign field like Phar greatest? Not for the first time I find myself Lap - or even Black Caviar? No. Please include your name, postal address and a telephone contact reaching for the Hazlitt line 'the test of In the final analysis the laurel of I completely agreed with John Scanlon's number. greatness is the page of history ', rather GROAT (Greatest Racehorse Of All elegantly argued review of Simon Letters may be edited As the author of 17 racing titles since than made dizzy by the contemporary Time) surely encompasses more than Cooper's book 'Frankel: The Greatest 1982 involving 10 different publishing media frenzy. pounds, lengths and seconds. The Racehorse of All Time and the Sport that houses (number 18 delayed owing to Frankel inhabits the realm of indefinable and the non-quantifiable Made Him'. Covid), I must echo John Scanlon's greatness. But ruler of all he surveys? enter the equation. That the hearts of First, and perhaps most importantly, it idea that it was waiting 300 years for everything they can to give them that praise (in the August Kingsley Klarion) History reveals numerous instances of Phar Lap and Secretariat were found to was absolutely right to celebrate the fact this particular thoroughbred does a elusive winner.
    [Show full text]
  • November Ebn Mon
    WEDNESDAY, 7TH OCTOBER 2020 ALL EYES ON KEENELAND NOVEMBER EBN MON. 9 - WED. 18 EUROPEAN BLOODSTOCK NEWS FOR MORE INFORMATION: TEL: +44 (0) 1638 666512 • FAX: +44 (0) 1638 666516 • [email protected] • WWW.BLOODSTOCKNEWS.EU TODAY’S HEADLINES TATTERSALLS EBN Sales Talk Click here to is brought to contact IRT, or you by IRT visit www.irt.com PANTILE’S BEAUTY SNAPPED UP BY BAHRAIN Bahrain’s intent as a growing power within European racing was clearly signalled when Book 1 of the Tattersalls October Yearling Sunday’s Gr.1 Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe is won by Sottsass Sale opened in Newmarket yesterday, writes Carl Evans. (Siyouni), who has been retired to join the stallion roster Operating for a member of the Gulf state’s royal family, at Coolmore. See story on page 17. bloodstock agent Oliver St Lawrence was underbidder on a 2,000,000gns half-sister to Golden Horn and then secured the session’s top lot, a son of Kingman (Lot 174), whose sale for 2,700,000gns was a windfall of epic size for breeder Colin Murfitt. IN TODAY’S ISSUE... It was also the best ring result for consignor Robin Sharp of Houghton Bloodstock, whose previous auction high was one of Steve Cargill’s Racing Week p20 500,000gns. Racing Round-up p21 The jewel which generated such a sum is a half-brother to the Gr.1 2,000 Guineas winner and sire Galileo Gold, who was First Crop Sire Maidens p26 produced by the Galileo mare Galicuix. She was bought by Pinhooking Tables p28 Murfitt for 8,000gns at the 2013 December Sale, having earlier See pages 3 & 5 – October Yearlings
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeography of Coral Reef Shore Gastropods in the Philippines
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274311543 Biogeography of Coral Reef Shore Gastropods in the Philippines Thesis · April 2004 CITATIONS READS 0 100 1 author: Benjamin Vallejo University of the Philippines Diliman 28 PUBLICATIONS 88 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: History of Philippine Science in the colonial period View project Available from: Benjamin Vallejo Retrieved on: 10 November 2016 Biogeography of Coral Reef Shore Gastropods in the Philippines Thesis submitted by Benjamin VALLEJO, JR, B.Sc (UPV, Philippines), M.Sc. (UPD, Philippines) in September 2003 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Marine Biology within the School of Marine Biology and Aquaculture James Cook University ABSTRACT The aim of this thesis is to describe the distribution of coral reef and shore gastropods in the Philippines, using the species rich taxa, Nerita, Clypeomorus, Muricidae, Littorinidae, Conus and Oliva. These taxa represent the major gastropod groups in the intertidal and shallow water ecosystems of the Philippines. This distribution is described with reference to the McManus (1985) basin isolation hypothesis of species diversity in Southeast Asia. I examine species-area relationships, range sizes and shapes, major ecological factors that may affect these relationships and ranges, and a phylogeny of one taxon. Range shape and orientation is largely determined by geography. Large ranges are typical of mid-intertidal herbivorous species. Triangualar shaped or narrow ranges are typical of carnivorous taxa. Narrow, overlapping distributions are more common in the central Philippines. The frequency of range sizesin the Philippines has the right skew typical of tropical high diversity systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Singapore's Seawalls Host Non-Native Marine Molluscs?
    Aquatic Invasions (2018) Volume 13, Issue 3: 365–378 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2018.13.3.05 Open Access © 2018 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2018 REABIC Research Article Do Singapore’s seawalls host non-native marine molluscs? Wen Ting Tan1, Lynette H.L. Loke1, Darren C.J. Yeo2, Siong Kiat Tan3 and Peter A. Todd1,* 1Experimental Marine Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 16 Science Drive 4, Block S3, #02-05, Singapore 117543 2Freshwater & Invasion Biology Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 16 Science Drive 4, Block S3, #02-05, Singapore 117543 3Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, 2 Conservatory Drive, Singapore 117377 *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Received: 9 March 2018 / Accepted: 8 August 2018 / Published online: 17 September 2018 Handling editor: Cynthia McKenzie Abstract Marine urbanization and the construction of artificial coastal structures such as seawalls have been implicated in the spread of non-native marine species for a variety of reasons, the most common being that seawalls provide unoccupied niches for alien colonisation. If urbanisation is accompanied by a concomitant increase in shipping then this may also be a factor, i.e. increased propagule pressure of non-native species due to translocation beyond their native range via the hulls of ships and/or in ballast water. Singapore is potentially highly vulnerable to invasion by non-native marine species as its coastline comprises over 60% seawall and it is one of the world’s busiest ports. The aim of this study is to investigate the native, non-native, and cryptogenic molluscs found on Singapore’s seawalls.
    [Show full text]
  • National Hunt Grade Ones Three Miles
    DATA BOOK STAKES RESULTS National Hunt Grade Ones three miles. Western Warrior therefore Bearing in mind that his stallion career The saying that everything comes to 181 SUPREME NOVICES' HURDLE G1 broke new ground when he won the was far from straightforward, he who waits may be about to come Arkle, but he needed every yard to Trempolino’s top-class son Germany true for Coolmore’s 20-year-old CHELTENHAM. March 11. 16.5f. Good to Soft. catch Champagne Fever. made quite an impact on the National stallion Oscar. This Sadler’s Wells 1. VAUTOUR (FR) 5 b g Robin des Champs - Gazelle de Mai (Dom Pasquini) O- Mrs S Ricci B- Haras de An element of speed was added to Hunt world. When Faugheen stallion – whose 2014 fee is Saint Voir, P Joubert TR- WP Mullins the mix in Western Warhorse’s case, maintained his unbeaten record with a €6,500 – has had the misfortune to 2. Josses Hill (IRE) 6 b g as his dam An Banog is a lightly-raced decisive victory in the Neptune finish second on the leading sires’ lists Winged Love - Credora Storm (Glacial Storm) daughter of the 2,000 Guineas third Investment Management Novices’ for 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13, 3. Vaniteux (FR) 5 br g Anshan, who possessed more speed Hurdle he became his sire’s second having previously taken third place in Voix du Nord - Expoville (Video Rock) than stamina. winner of one of the Cheltenham 2009-10 and fourth in 2008-09. At Age Starts Wins Places Earned However, An Banog is a half-sister Festival’s Gr1 novice hurdle contests.
    [Show full text]
  • 1930S Greats Horses/Jockeys
    1930s Greats Horses/Jockeys Year Horse Gender Age Year Jockeys Rating Year Jockeys Rating 1933 Cavalcade Colt 2 1933 Arcaro, E. 1 1939 Adams, J. 2 1933 Bazaar Filly 2 1933 Bellizzi, D. 1 1939 Arcaro, E. 2 1933 Mata Hari Filly 2 1933 Coucci, S. 1 1939 Dupuy, H. 1 1933 Brokers Tip Colt 3 1933 Fisher, H. 0 1939 Fallon, L. 0 1933 Head Play Colt 3 1933 Gilbert, J. 2 1939 James, B. 3 1933 War Glory Colt 3 1933 Horvath, K. 0 1939 Longden, J. 3 1933 Barn Swallow Filly 3 1933 Humphries, L. 1 1939 Meade, D. 3 1933 Gallant Sir Colt 4 1933 Jones, R. 2 1939 Neves, R. 1 1933 Equipoise Horse 5 1933 Longden, J. 1 1939 Peters, M. 1 1933 Tambour Mare 5 1933 Meade, D. 1 1939 Richards, H. 1 1934 Balladier Colt 2 1933 Mills, H. 1 1939 Robertson, A. 1 1934 Chance Sun Colt 2 1933 Pollard, J. 1 1939 Ryan, P. 1 1934 Nellie Flag Filly 2 1933 Porter, E. 2 1939 Seabo, G. 1 1934 Cavalcade Colt 3 1933 Robertson, A. 1 1939 Smith, F. A. 2 1934 Discovery Colt 3 1933 Saunders, W. 1 1939 Smith, G. 1 1934 Bazaar Filly 3 1933 Simmons, H. 1 1939 Stout, J. 1 1934 Mata Hari Filly 3 1933 Smith, J. 1 1939 Taylor, W. L. 1 1934 Advising Anna Filly 4 1933 Westrope, J. 4 1939 Wall, N. 1 1934 Faireno Horse 5 1933 Woolf, G. 1 1939 Westrope, J. 1 1934 Equipoise Horse 6 1933 Workman, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Unavailable Sequences Are Indicated with Dashes
    SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Table S1. List of samples sequenced in this study. Not all genes are available for each specimen; unavailable sequences are indicated with dashes. Generic assignments are based on our revised classification; uncertain assignments are indicated by single quotation marks. Type species of valid genera are in bold. Voucher locations: Natural History Museum, London (NHMUK); Australian Museum, Sydney (AM); Western Australian Museum, Perth (WAM); Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville (UF); University of Costa Rica (UCR); Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (CNMO); ‘La Sapienza’ University of Rome (BAU); Muséum Nationale d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris (MNHN). Accession numbers beginning with EU were published by Claremont et al. (2008); accession numbers beginning with FN were published by Barco et al. (2010); accession numbers beginning with FR were published by Claremont et al. (2011). Species Locality Voucher 12S 28S 16S COI Rapaninae (outgroup) Concholepas Chile: Isla Rojas, Region NHMUK FN677398 EU391554 FN677453 EU391581 concholepas XI 19990303 (Bruguière, 1789) Dicathais orbita Australia: Tasmania AM C458269 FN677395 FN677459 FN677450 EU391573 (Gmelin, 1791) Mancinella intermedia Mozambique: Cabo NHMUK FN677384 EU391543 FN677434 EU391574 (Kiener, 1835) Delgado Prov. 20060440 Rapana bezoar Japan: Kochi Pref. NHMUK FN677376 FN677476 FN677438 FN677421 (Linnaeus, 1767) 20080038 Thais nodosa Ghana: Matrakni Point NHMUK FN677373 EU391566 FN677425 EU391579 (Linnaeus, 1758) 20070652 Thalessa aculeata New Caledonia: Touho NHMUK FN677374 FN677477 FN677426 FN677422 (Deshayes, 1844) 20070631 Ergalataxinae Kuroda & Habe, 1971 Trachypollia lugubris Costa Rica: Puntarenas UCR 7797 HE583773 HE583860 HE583924 HE584011 (C.B. Adams, 1852) Trachypollia lugubris Panama BAU 00248 HE583774 HE583861 HE583925 HE584012 (C.B. Adams, 1852) CLADE A ‘Morula’ anaxares Mozambique: Cabo NHMUK HE583775 EU391541 HE583926 EU391584 (Kiener, 1836) Delgado Prov.
    [Show full text]
  • Mantis Shrimp - Wikipedia
    Mantis shrimp - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mantis_shrimp Mantis shrimp Mantis shrimps , or stomatopods , are marine crustaceans of the Mantis shrimp order Stomatopoda . Some species have specialised calcified "clubs" that can strike with great power, while others have sharp forelimbs used Temporal range: 400–0 Ma to capture prey. They branched from other members of the class Pre Є Є O S D C P T J K Pg N Malacostraca around 340 million years ago. [2] Mantis shrimps typically grow to around 10 cm (3.9 in) in length. A few can reach up to 38 cm (15 in). [3] The largest mantis shrimp ever caught had a length of 46 cm (18 in); it was caught in the Indian River near Fort Pierce, Florida, in the United States.[4] A mantis shrimp's carapace (the bony, thick shell that covers crustaceans and some other species) covers only the rear part of Odontodactylus scyllarus the head and the first four segments of the thorax. Varieties range from shades of brown to vivid colors, as more than 450 species of mantis Scientific classification shrimps are known. They are among the most important predators in Kingdom: Animalia many shallow, tropical and subtropical marine habitats. However, Phylum: Arthropoda despite being common, they are poorly understood, as many species spend most of their lives tucked away in burrows and holes. [5] Subphylum: Crustacea Called "sea locusts" by ancient Assyrians, "prawn killers" in Australia, [6] Class: Malacostraca and now sometimes referred to as "thumb splitters"—because of the Subclass: Hoplocarida [7] animal's ability to inflict painful gashes if handled incautiously Order: Stomatopoda —mantis shrimps have powerful claws that are used to attack and kill Latreille, 1817 prey by spearing, stunning, or dismembering.
    [Show full text]
  • SWFSC Archive
    Val. 89, No. 38, pp. 439450 12 October 1976 PROC EEDl NGS OF THE BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON OCCURRENCE OF THE CARIBBEAN STOMATOPOD, BATHYSQUILLA MZCROPS, OFF HAWAII, WITH ADDITIONAL RECORDS FOR B. MZCROPS AND B. CRASSZSPZNOSA BY RAYMONDB. MANNINGAND PAUL STRUHSAKER Smithonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560, and National Marine Fisheries Service, Honolulu, Hawaii 96812 During the sampling program of the National Marine Fish- eries Service (NMFS) aboard the NOAA research vessel TOWNSENDCROMWELL in 1972, one specimen of an unusual stomatopod was taken by trawl off Maui, Hawaiian Islands, at a depth of 731-786 m. It proved to be an adult female of the rare BathysquiUa microps (Manning, 1961), then known from only three specimens taken in 732-952 m off southeastern Florida and the Bahamas (Manning, 1969a). Bathysquilla microps was the second species of bathy- squillid to be recognized, the first being B. crmsispinosa (Fukuda, 1909), originally described from Japan and subse- quently recorded from additional localities in the western Indian Ocean. It occurs in depths between 230 and 310 m. A third bathysquillid representing another genus, Zndosquilla manihinei Ingle and Menett, 1971, was described from a unique specimen taken off Cosmoledo Atoll, Indian Ocean, in a depth of 420 m. Apparently bathysquillids are restricted to moderate depths of the outer shelf and upper slope (Fig. 2). The bathysquillids live in far greater depths than the major- ity of known stomatopods. The deepest record given by Kemp (1913) in his monograph of the Indo-West-Pacific stomato- pods was 370-419 fm (677-767 m) for Squilloides kptosquilb from the “Investigator” collections.
    [Show full text]