Vascular Related Pregnancy Complications: Genetics and Remote Cardiovascular Risk
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Vascular related pregnancy complications: genetics and remote cardiovascular risk Annelous Berends ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The work presented in this thesis was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Divi- sion of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, in close collaboration with the Departments of Epidemiology & Biostatistics and Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. The studies described in this thesis were supported by an Erasmus MC Grant. Additional support was provided by a Stipendium of the NVOG, Werkgroep Perinatologie en Maternale ziekten. The Genetic Research in Isolated Populations (GRIP) is supported by the Centre for Medical Systems Biol- ogy (CMSB). The contributions of the general practitioners and midwives of the ERF region are greatly acknowledged. Erasmus University and the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam provided financial support for the publication of this thesis. Special thanks for additional support provided by Bayer Schering Pharma. Cover picture: Vicky Emptage Layout and printing: Optima Grafische Communicatie, Rotterdam ISBN 978-90-8559-432-1 © Annelous Berends, 2008 No part of this thesis may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form of by any means without permission of the author or, when appropriate, of the publishers of the publications Vascular related pregnancy complications: genetics and remote cardiovascular risk Vasculaire zwangerschapscomplicaties: erfelijkheid en toekomstig cardiovasculair risico Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam op gezag van de rector magnificus Prof. dr. S.W.J. Lamberts en volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties. De openbare verdediging zal plaatsvinden op woensdag 19 november 2008 om 15.45 uur door Anne Louise Berends geboren te Leiden PROMOTIECOMMISSIE Promotoren: Prof. dr. E.A.P. Steegers Prof. dr. B.A. Oostra Prof. dr. C.M. van Duijn Overige leden: Prof. dr. J.C.M. Witteman Prof. dr. J.A.M. van der Post Dr. E.J. Sijbrands MANUSCRIPTS BASED ON THE STUDIES DESCRIBED IN THIS THESIS: Chapter 2.1 AL Berends, EAP Steegers, A Isaacs, YS Aulchenko, F Liu, CJM de Groot, BA Oostra, CM van Duijn. Familial aggregation of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction in a geneti- cally isolated population in The Netherlands. Eur J Hum Genet, in press Chapter 2.2 AL Berends, AM Bertoli-Avella, CJM de Groot, CM van Duijn, BA Oostra, EAP Steegers. STOX1 gene in preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. BJOG, 2007; 114:1163-7. Chapter 2.3 AL Berends, EAP Steegers, M Struchalin, D Lont, A Isaacs, YS Aulchenko, CJM de Groot, BA Oostra, CM van Duijn. Genome wide association analysis of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. In progress Chapter 3.1 AL Berends, CJM de Groot, EJ Sijbrands, MP Sie, SH Benneheij, R Pal, R Heydanus, BA Oostra, CM van Duijn, EAP Steegers. Shared constitutional risks for maternal vascular-related preg- nancy complications and future cardiovascular disease. Hypertension, 2008;51:1034-41. Chapter 3.2 AL Berends/ IP Gaugler-Senden, CJM de Groot, EAP Steegers. Severe, very early onset pre- eclampsia: subsequent pregnancies and future parental cardiovascular health. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2008;140:171-7 Chapter 3.3 AL Berends, MC Zillikens, CJM de Groot, F Rivadeneira, BA Oostra, CM van Duijn, EAP Steegers. Body composition by dual energy-X-ray absorptiometry in women with previous preeclamp- sia or small for gestational age offspring. BJOG, in press Chapter 3.4 AL Berends, MC Zillikens, CJM de Groot, FH de Jong, BA Oostra, CM van Duijn, EAP Steegers. Insulin, androgens and bone mineral density in women with previous preeclampsia or preg- nancies complicated by intrauterine growth restriction. In progress CONTENTS 1. Introduction 9 2. Genetics of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction 19 2.1 Familial aggregation of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction in a 21 genetically isolated population 2.2 STOX1 gene in preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction 35 2.3 Genome wide association analysis of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth 45 restriction 3. Preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction and remote cardiovas- 59 cular disease 3.1 Shared constitutional risks for maternal vascular-related pregnancy compli- 61 cations and future cardiovascular disease. 3.2 Severe, very early onset preeclampsia: subsequent pregnancies and future 79 parental cardiovascular health 3.3 Body composition by dual energy-X-ray absorptiometry in women with pre- 93 vious preeclampsia or intrauterine growth restriction 3.4 Insulin, androgens and bone mineral density in women with previous pre- 109 eclampsia or pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth restriction 4. General discussion 123 5. Summary/ Samenvatting 139 Dankwoord 149 About the author 153 1 Introduction Introduction Preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) are common vascular related preg- nancy syndromes of unknown cause. Both preeclampsia and IUGR are responsible for a sig- nificant maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide1. Preeclampsia affects ap- hapter 1 hapter proximately 2.5-3.0% of women2. It is diagnosed by de novo hypertension and proteinuria C after 20 weeks of gestation and potentially progresses to a multisystemic syndrome charac- terized by increased vasoconstriction, metabolic changes, endothelial dysfunction, activation of coagulation cascade and inflammatory response3. Eclampsia is considered an end stage of the syndrome characterized by generalized seizures. In addition to the maternal clinical symptoms, in approximately one third of the preeclamptic pregnancies fetal growth is im- paired suggested as a consequence of impaired placental function4. Impaired fetal growth related to placental dysfunction can also occur in absence of a maternal clinical syndrome. In this thesis we focus on the phenotype of impaired intrauterine growth defined by placental dysfunction excluding impaired intrauterine growth caused by e.g. smoking, infection and congenital diseases. Because of the unknown aetiology, preeclampsia and IUGR cannot be prevented and the only definitive treatment is still delivery. Although delivery is almost always curative for the mother in case of preeclampsia, it might not be best for a premature fetus5. Consequently, balancing maternal and fetal risks and benefits is a challenge for clinicians in the management of these pregnancy disorders6. Extensive research has not elucidated the aetiology of preeclampsia and IUGR, but it has provided better understanding of their pathophysiology. It is generally agreed upon that a placenta is required for the development of preeclampsia7. The current and widely accepted concept is that preeclampsia progresses in two stages; preclinical and clinical2. The first stage arises from poor placental development in early pregnancy and its suboptimal maternal blood supply2 related to reduced endovascular trophoblast invasion and inadequate uteroplacental artery remodeling7. Poor placentation is not specific to preeclampsia but is also observed in IUGR8. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that preeclampsia and IUGR may be related dis- orders yet with different clinical manifestations9. In women who develop preeclampsia, an oxidatively stressed placenta is thought to release factors into the maternal circulation caus- ing the maternal clinical syndrome (second stage) of which generalized endothelial dysfunc- tion is considered a central pathophysiological feature2. The mechanism(s) by which poor placentation occurs and the subsequent progression into the systemic maternal response are intense areas of research6. Numerous factors are proposed to be involved among which oxi- dative stress, trombophilia, immunological factors, angiogenic factors and their endogenous antagonists (summarized by Ilekis et al 6). Furthermore, genetic factors are likely to contribute since a familial component is well established in both preeclampsia as well as IUGR10-12. In the first part of this thesis we describe the search for new susceptibility genes since this strategy helps to elucidate the underlying pathogenetic mechanisms of disease. Although familial clustering of the disease has been long recognized, the genetics of preeclampsia 11 Chapter 1 and IUGR is far from understood. Different modes of inheritance have been proposed over the years varying from single gene models to complex segregation involving both mater- nal and fetal genotypes10,11,12. In addition to Mendelian modes of inheritance alternative ge- netic mechanisms such as parent-of-origin effects were proposed for both preeclampsia and IUGR13,14. Most efforts aiming to identify genes have targeted preeclampsia, while IUGR was studied to a lesser extent. Numerous candidate gene studies have been performed, but have Table 1. Candidate genes studied in preeclampsia Gene Gene Gene name Gene name symbol symbol Thrombophilia Interleukin 1β IL1B Factor V Leiden F5 Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist IL1RN Prothrombin 20210 F2 Interleukin 10 IL10 Methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase MTHFR T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 CTLA4 Cystathione β-synthase CBS TNF-receptor superfamily member 6 FAS Plasminogen activator inhibitor I SERPINE1 Oxidative stress β-Fibrinogen FGB Microsomal epoxide hydrolase EPHX1 Platelet glycoprotein IIIa ITGB3 Glutathione S-transferase pi GSTP1 Thrombomodulin THBD Glutathione S-transferase mu1 GSTM1 Factor VII