Hierarchical Developmental Morphology: the Case of the Inflorescence of Philodendron Ornatum (Araceae)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Size Variations of Flowering Characters in Arum Italicum (Araceae)
M. GIBERNAU,]. ALBRE, 2008 101 Size Variations of Flowering Characters in Arum italicum (Araceae) Marc Gibernau· and Jerome Albre Universite Paul Sabatier Laboratoire d'Evolution & Diversite Biologique (UMR 5174) Bat.4R3-B2 31062 Toulouse cedex 9 France *e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION In Arum, bigger individuals should An extreme form of flowering character proportionally invest more in the female variations according to the size is gender function (number or weight of female modification, which occurs in several flowers) than the male. The aim of this species of Arisaema (Clay, 1993). Individ paper is to quantify variations in repro ual plant gender changes from pure male, ductive characters (size of the spadix when small, to monoecious (A. dracon parts, number of inflorescences) in rela tium) or pure female (A. ringens) when tion to plant and inflorescence sizes. The large (Gusman & Gusman, 2003). This appendix represents 44% of the spadix gender change is reversible, damaged length. The female zone length represents female individuals will flower as male the 16.5% of the spadix length and is much following year (Lovett Doust & Cavers, longer than the male zone (6%). Moreover 1982). These changes are related to change these three spadix zones increase with in plant size and are explained by the plant vigour indicating an increasing size-advantage model. The size-advantage investment into reproduction and pollina model postulates a sex change when an tor attraction. It appears that the length of increase in body size is related to differen appendix increased proportionally more tial abilities to produce or sire offspring than the lengths of the fertile zones. -
The Evolution of Pollinator–Plant Interaction Types in the Araceae
BRIEF COMMUNICATION doi:10.1111/evo.12318 THE EVOLUTION OF POLLINATOR–PLANT INTERACTION TYPES IN THE ARACEAE Marion Chartier,1,2 Marc Gibernau,3 and Susanne S. Renner4 1Department of Structural and Functional Botany, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria 2E-mail: [email protected] 3Centre National de Recherche Scientifique, Ecologie des Foretsˆ de Guyane, 97379 Kourou, France 4Department of Biology, University of Munich, 80638 Munich, Germany Received August 6, 2013 Accepted November 17, 2013 Most plant–pollinator interactions are mutualistic, involving rewards provided by flowers or inflorescences to pollinators. An- tagonistic plant–pollinator interactions, in which flowers offer no rewards, are rare and concentrated in a few families including Araceae. In the latter, they involve trapping of pollinators, which are released loaded with pollen but unrewarded. To understand the evolution of such systems, we compiled data on the pollinators and types of interactions, and coded 21 characters, including interaction type, pollinator order, and 19 floral traits. A phylogenetic framework comes from a matrix of plastid and new nuclear DNA sequences for 135 species from 119 genera (5342 nucleotides). The ancestral pollination interaction in Araceae was recon- structed as probably rewarding albeit with low confidence because information is available for only 56 of the 120–130 genera. Bayesian stochastic trait mapping showed that spadix zonation, presence of an appendix, and flower sexuality were correlated with pollination interaction type. In the Araceae, having unisexual flowers appears to have provided the morphological precon- dition for the evolution of traps. Compared with the frequency of shifts between deceptive and rewarding pollination systems in orchids, our results indicate less lability in the Araceae, probably because of morphologically and sexually more specialized inflorescences. -
Full of Beans: a Study on the Alignment of Two Flowering Plants Classification Systems
Full of beans: a study on the alignment of two flowering plants classification systems Yi-Yun Cheng and Bertram Ludäscher School of Information Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA {yiyunyc2,ludaesch}@illinois.edu Abstract. Advancements in technologies such as DNA analysis have given rise to new ways in organizing organisms in biodiversity classification systems. In this paper, we examine the feasibility of aligning two classification systems for flowering plants using a logic-based, Region Connection Calculus (RCC-5) ap- proach. The older “Cronquist system” (1981) classifies plants using their mor- phological features, while the more recent Angiosperm Phylogeny Group IV (APG IV) (2016) system classifies based on many new methods including ge- nome-level analysis. In our approach, we align pairwise concepts X and Y from two taxonomies using five basic set relations: congruence (X=Y), inclusion (X>Y), inverse inclusion (X<Y), overlap (X><Y), and disjointness (X!Y). With some of the RCC-5 relationships among the Fabaceae family (beans family) and the Sapindaceae family (maple family) uncertain, we anticipate that the merging of the two classification systems will lead to numerous merged solutions, so- called possible worlds. Our research demonstrates how logic-based alignment with ambiguities can lead to multiple merged solutions, which would not have been feasible when aligning taxonomies, classifications, or other knowledge or- ganization systems (KOS) manually. We believe that this work can introduce a novel approach for aligning KOS, where merged possible worlds can serve as a minimum viable product for engaging domain experts in the loop. Keywords: taxonomy alignment, KOS alignment, interoperability 1 Introduction With the advent of large-scale technologies and datasets, it has become increasingly difficult to organize information using a stable unitary classification scheme over time. -
Vascular Plant Families of the United States Grouped by Diagnostic Features
Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 12-6-2019 Vascular Plant Families of the United States Grouped by Diagnostic Features James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Vascular Plant Families of the United States Grouped by Diagnostic Features" (2019). Botanical Studies. 96. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/96 This Flora of the United States and North America is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLOWERING PLANT FAMILIES OF THE UNITED STATES GROUPED BY DIAGNOSTIC FEATURES James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Second edition — 6 December 2019 The focus is on families of plants found in the conterminous United States, including ornamentals. The listing of a family is not meant to imply that every species has that feature. I am using a fewfamily names, such as Liliaceae, Plantaginaceae, and Scrophulariaceae, in the traditional sense, because their limits remain unsettled. Parasitic on branches Dioscoreaceae -
Field Identification of the 50 Most Common Plant Families in Temperate Regions
Field identification of the 50 most common plant families in temperate regions (including agricultural, horticultural, and wild species) by Lena Struwe [email protected] © 2016, All rights reserved. Note: Listed characteristics are the most common characteristics; there might be exceptions in rare or tropical species. This compendium is available for free download without cost for non- commercial uses at http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~struwe/. The author welcomes updates and corrections. 1 Overall phylogeny – living land plants Bryophytes Mosses, liverworts, hornworts Lycophytes Clubmosses, etc. Ferns and Fern Allies Ferns, horsetails, moonworts, etc. Gymnosperms Conifers, pines, cycads and cedars, etc. Magnoliids Monocots Fabids Ranunculales Rosids Malvids Caryophyllales Ericales Lamiids The treatment for flowering plants follows the APG IV (2016) Campanulids classification. Not all branches are shown. © Lena Struwe 2016, All rights reserved. 2 Included families (alphabetical list): Amaranthaceae Geraniaceae Amaryllidaceae Iridaceae Anacardiaceae Juglandaceae Apiaceae Juncaceae Apocynaceae Lamiaceae Araceae Lauraceae Araliaceae Liliaceae Asphodelaceae Magnoliaceae Asteraceae Malvaceae Betulaceae Moraceae Boraginaceae Myrtaceae Brassicaceae Oleaceae Bromeliaceae Orchidaceae Cactaceae Orobanchaceae Campanulaceae Pinaceae Caprifoliaceae Plantaginaceae Caryophyllaceae Poaceae Convolvulaceae Polygonaceae Cucurbitaceae Ranunculaceae Cupressaceae Rosaceae Cyperaceae Rubiaceae Equisetaceae Rutaceae Ericaceae Salicaceae Euphorbiaceae Scrophulariaceae -
Ridha El Mokni & Mohamed Hédi El Aouni Zantedeschia Aethiopica (Araceae) a New Species Naturalized in the Northwest of Tuni
Fl. Medit. 22: 191-196 doi: 10.7320/FlMedit22.191 Version of Record published online on 28 December 2012 Ridha El Mokni & Mohamed Hédi El Aouni Zantedeschia aethiopica (Araceae) a new species naturalized in the Northwest of Tunisia Abstract El Mokni, R. & Hédi El Aouni, M.: Zantedeschia aethiopica (Araceae) a new species natural- ized in the Northwest of Tunisia. — Fl. Medit. 22: 191-196. 2012. — ISSN: 1120-4052 print- ed, 2240-4538 online. Zantedeschia aethiopica (L.) Spreng. (Araceae), originating from S Africa, was found natural- ized in many sites of the Kroumiria region (Northwest of Tunisia). This report represents the first record for the Tunisian flora. Distribution and ecological notes are also given. Key words:Alien flora, N Africa, aroid species. Introduction Zantedeschia Spreng. the classic white calla lily or arum lily is a genus of the Araceae Juss. It is an important ornament grown worldwide (Kuehny 2000; Snijder & al. 2004; Wright & al. 2005; Ni & al. 2009, 2010), with about eight species in two sections, all native to Africa (Letty 1973; Singh & al. 1996). The genus name Zantedeschia was given in honor to Giovanni Zantedeschi (1797-1873) (Fournier 1977), an Italian botanist, priest, physicist and professor. Diploid plants in all Zantedeschia Spreng. sp. pl. contain 32 chro- mosomes, 2n=2x=32 (Yao & al. 1994). This very attractive plant has been described in 1753, by Carl Linnaeus as Calla aethiopica and it has been commonly known as the calla lily ever since. In 1826, Sprengel transferred it to a new genus which he called Zantedeschia Spreng. (Letty 1973). The present work confirms the naturalization of Zantedeschia aethiopica and give an idea about its actual distribution within the Tunisian territory. -
Araceae – Arum Family
ARACEAE – ARUM FAMILY Plant: herbs (perennials) or rarely shrubs; erect, climbing, or prostrate Stem: sometimes sap milky, watery and may be pungent Root: tuberous or rhizomatous Leaves: simple or compound, basal but arising from stem and forming a sheath, alternate, sword-shaped or broader, usually large, smooth, glossy, often net veined, ± fragrant when crushed Flowers: mostly unisexual (monoecious or dioecious), rarely perfect; sepals and petals (4-6 reduced tepals) but often absent or inconspicuous, large floral leaf or bract (spathe) surrounds spike-like stem (spadix) with many minute flowers; (2)4-6-8 stamens; ovary superior, 1 style or none, carpels 1 to many Fruit: usually a berry Other: worldwide but more abundant in tropics; Monocotyledons Group Genera: 110+ genera; locally Arisaema (Jack-in-the-pulpit), Calla (water arum), Orontium, Peltandra (arrow arum), Symplocarpus (skunk cabbage) WARNING – family descriptions are only a layman’s guide and should not be used as definitive Flower Morphology in the Araceae (Arum) Family Genus Symplocarpus Genus Arisaema Spathe Spadix Spadix (with tiny flower flowers) Spathe Skunk Cabbage Green Dragon Jack In The Pulpit Spathe – bract(s) that form below the inflorescence that often partially enclose the flower structure (spadix). Spadix – a thickened spike of usually densely crowded and small flowers ARACEAE – ARUM FAMILY Green Dragon [Dragon Arum]; Arisaema dracontium (L.) Schott. [Woodland] Jack In The Pulpit [Indian Turnip]; Arisaema triphyllum (L.) Schott. Skunk-Cabbage; Symplocarpus foetidus (L.) Salisb. ex Nutt. Green Dragon [Dragon Arum or Root] USDA Arisaema dracontium (L.) Schott. Araceae (Arum Family) Oak Openings Metropark, Lucas County, Ohio Notes: flowers (no petals or sepals) yellowish, small, on very long spadix partially wrapped by spathe; leaves distinct in 5-15 ovate- lanceolate leaflets; fruit a red berry; late spring to early summer [V Max Brown, 2005] [Woodland] Jack In The Pulpit [Indian Turnip] USDA Arisaema triphyllum (L.) Schott. -
Arecaceae the Palm Family
ARECACEAE THE PALM FAMILY The Leaves are: • Parallel veined • Large • Compound • Alternate • Monocots Peach Palm (Bactris gasipaes) • Woody shrubs or trees comprising about 85 genera and 2,800 species • Leaves large, alternate, with a petiole, and palmately or pinnately compound, lacking stipules • Inflorescence is usually a panicle and is typically with one or more bracts or spathes • Flowers are actinomorphic, generally small, and are bisexual or more often unisexual. • Perianth usually consists of two whorls of 3 distinct or connate segments each, often distinguished primarily by size, the outer series or calyx being the smaller. • Androecium consists typically of 6 distinct stamens in two whorls of 3 each but sometimes comprises up to several hundred variously connate or adnate stamens. • Gynoecium is syncarpous or apocarpous. • Syncarpous forms consist of a single compound pistil of usually 3 carpels, 1 or 3 styles, and a superior ovary with 3 locules, each containing a single basal, axile, or apical ovule. • Apocarpous forms consist of usually 3 simple pistils, each with a superior ovary containing one locule with a single basal to apical ovule. • Fruit is usually a drupe. • Coconut (Cocos nucifera), Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera), Peach Palm (Bactris gasipaes) Coconut (Cocos nucifera) Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera) CYCLANTHACEAE The Leaves are: • Parallel veined • Coming to the midrib • Simple or compound • Alternate • Monocots • Shrubs, or herbs Sphaeradenia alleniana • Stem contains watery or milky juice • Leaves alternate; spiral (usually), or distichous; with a petiole; sheathing; simple, or compound; when compound palmate and “palm-like” • Inflorescences terminal, or axillary; pedunculate, unbranched, long-cylindrical to subspherical spadices, with rather few to very numerous flowers; • Flowers small, actinomorphic or zygomorphic, lacking a peduncle • Perianth of ‘tepals’; 4; free, or joined • Androecium consists of 10-20 stamens • Gynoecium has 4 carpels, syncarpous, ovary is partly inferior, or inferior and 1- locular. -
Leaf and Inflorescence Evidence for Near-Basal Araceae and an Unexpected Diversity of Other Monocots from the Late Early Cretaceous of Spain
Journal of Systematic Palaeontology ISSN: 1477-2019 (Print) 1478-0941 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tjsp20 Leaf and inflorescence evidence for near-basal Araceae and an unexpected diversity of other monocots from the late Early Cretaceous of Spain Luis Miguel Sender, James A. Doyle, Garland R. Upchurch Jr, Uxue Villanueva- Amadoz & José B. Diez To cite this article: Luis Miguel Sender, James A. Doyle, Garland R. Upchurch Jr, Uxue Villanueva-Amadoz & José B. Diez (2018): Leaf and inflorescence evidence for near-basal Araceae and an unexpected diversity of other monocots from the late Early Cretaceous of Spain, Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, DOI: 10.1080/14772019.2018.1528999 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2018.1528999 View supplementary material Published online: 09 Nov 2018. Submit your article to this journal View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tjsp20 Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 2018 Vol. 0, No. 0, 1–34, http://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2018.1528999 Leaf and inflorescence evidence for near-basal Araceae and an unexpected diversity of other monocots from the late Early Cretaceous of Spain aà b c d e Luis Miguel Sender , James A. Doyle , Garland R. Upchurch Jr , Uxue Villanueva-Amadoz and Jose B. Diez aDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Chuo University, 1-13-27 Kasuga, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan; bDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, -
Distribution, Abundance and Taxonomic Status of Typhonium Species (Araceae) in the East Kimberley
Distribution, abundance and taxonomic status of Typhonium species (Araceae) in the east Kimberley. Report pertaining to: $2000 BANKWEST LANDSCOPE CONSERVATION VISA CARD GRANT T.Handasyde, A.N.Start and C.Done CONTENTS Page BACKGROUND 1 AIMS 2 METHODS 2 RESULTS 3 DISCUSSION 13 CONCLUSIONS 14 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 14 EPILOGUE 14 REFERENCES 15 2 LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES Figure 1. Typhonium sp. ‘type 1’ as collected at Site 1 in 2001 (photocopy of 4 Herbarium specimen). Figure 2. Typhonium sp. ‘type 2’ as collected at Site 1 in 2001 (photocopy of 5 Herbarium specimen). Figure 3. Typhonium sp. ‘type 1’ as collected at Site 1 in 2001. 6 Figure 4. Typhonium sp. ‘type 1’ as collected at Site 1 in 2001. 6 Figure 5 Corms of Typhonium sp. (type 1) collected at Site 1 in 2001. 6 Figure 6. Ophioglossum costatum as collected on 09/01/2001 (photocopy of 7 Herbarium specimen). Figure 7. Site 2. Typhonium ‘Specimen 1’ was found close to the Bauhinia tree at 8 the right hand side of the photo. Figure 8. Site 1. Close up of location where Typhonium sp. was found 8 (as for Figure 9). Figure 9. Site 1. Location where Typhonium sp. was found (as for 8 Figure 8). Figure 10. Typhonium location Sites 1 and 2. Note black soil ‘fingers’ 9 as delineated for King Location 369 & 599 (Sherrard 1993). (Aerial photograph – DOLA 1999). Figure 11. ‘Mud Map’of Site 2 (location of Typhoniums found in 10 2003). King Location 369 & 599 (Sherrard 1993). Figure 12. Section of 1:100,000 topographic map (Royal Australian Survey Corps, 11 1991) with Typhonium collection Sites 1 and 2, and King Location 599 and 781 boundaries. -
2 ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP (APG) SYSTEM History Of
ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP (APG) SYSTEM The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, or APG, refers to an informal international group of systematic botanists who came together to try to establish a consensus view of the taxonomy of flowering plants (angiosperms) that would reflect new knowledge about their relationships based upon phylogenetic studies. As of 2010, three incremental versions of a classification system have resulted from this collaboration (published in 1998, 2003 and 2009). An important motivation for the group was what they viewed as deficiencies in prior angiosperm classifications, which were not based on monophyletic groups (i.e. groups consisting of all the descendants of a common ancestor). APG publications are increasingly influential, with a number of major herbaria changing the arrangement of their collections to match the latest APG system. Angiosperm classification and the APG Until detailed genetic evidence became available, the classification of flowering plants (also known as angiosperms, Angiospermae, Anthophyta or Magnoliophyta) was based on their morphology (particularly that of the flower) and their biochemistry (what kinds of chemical compound they contained or produced). Classification systems were typically produced by an individual botanist or by a small group. The result was a large number of such systems (see List of systems of plant taxonomy). Different systems and their updates tended to be favoured in different countries; e.g. the Engler system in continental Europe; the Bentham & Hooker system in Britain (particularly influential because it was used by Kew); the Takhtajan system in the former Soviet Union and countries within its sphere of influence; and the Cronquist system in the United States. -
Vascular Plant Families of the United States (With Common Names and Numerical Summary)
Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 2-21-2020 Vascular Plant Families of the United States (with Common Names and Numerical Summary) James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Vascular Plant Families of the United States (with Common Names and Numerical Summary)" (2020). Botanical Studies. 97. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/97 This Flora of the United States and North America is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VASCULAR PLANT FAMILIES OF THE UNITED STATES (WITH COMMON NAMES AND NUMERICAL SUMMARY) James P. Smith Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 21 February 2020 There are four groups of vascular plants — lycophytes (often called fern allies), ferns, gymnosperms, and flowering plants (angiosperms). This inventory includes native plants, along with introduced weeds, crops, and ornamentals that are naturalized and that maintain themselves without our assistance. I have also included plants that have not been collected in recent years and may well be extinct or extirpated. The geographic coverage is the conterminous or contiguous United States, the region known more informally as the “lower 48.” Alaska, Hawai’i, Puerto Rico, and the U.