DOCSLIB.ORG

The Problem of Nature in the Phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Problem of Nature in the Phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 5-8-2020 The Problem of Nature in the Phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty Alessio Rotundo Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Part of the Continental Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Rotundo, A. (2020). The Problem of Nature in the Phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1868 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. THE PROBLEM OF NATURE IN THE PHENOMENOLOGY OF MERLEAU-PONTY A Dissertation Submitted to Duquesne University Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Alessio Rotundo May 2020 Copyright by Alessio Rotundo 2020 THE PROBLEM OF NATURE IN THE PHENOMENOLOGY OF MERLEAU-PONTY By Alessio Rotundo Approved on December 9th, 2019 ________________________________ ________________________________ Dr. Laney Rodemeyer Dr. Fred Evans Associate Professor Professor Duquesne University Duquesne University Philosophy Philosophy ________________________________ Dr. Anthony Steinbock Professor Stony Brook University Philosophy ________________________________ ________________________________ Dr. Daniel Selcer Dr. Kristine L. Blair Associate Professor and Interim Chair Dean, Duquesne University Duquesne University McAnulty College and Graduate School Philosophy of Liberal Arts iii ABSTRACT THE PROBLEM OF NATURE IN THE PHENOMENOLOGY OF MERLEAU-PONTY By Alessio Rotundo May 2020 Dissertation supervised by Dr. Lanei Rodemeyer In my dissertation, I show that Merleau-Ponty’s idea of nature yields a double meaning: nature as ensemble of genetic and productive processes that are attainable in experience (phenomenal nature) and nature as that which enables this experience (transcendental nature). My thesis is that the two meanings of nature, when taken together, offer a guide to Merleau-Ponty’s final philosophical formulations about “flesh” and the “visible” and the “invisible.” The aim of the dissertation is to trace the salient conceptual and methodological complications entailed by this conception. I argue that the bivalence of the problem of nature in Merleau-Ponty receives a methodological clarification and proves coherent if we pay attention to the way Merleau-Ponty understands the thrust of radicalization in play in Husserl’s later work in phenomenology, especially regarding his expansion of the notion of intentionality. iv DEDICATION To Ron Bruzina. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The successful completion of this dissertation has been made possible by many friends and colleagues, to whom I would like to express my gratitude. I would like to thank Dr. Lanei Rodemeyer for her focused suggestions and comments through a material and a style of composition that was not always easy to read. I also would like to thank Dr. Fred Evans for his continuous readiness to engage in several insightful conversations about my topic. Their contribution has dramatically increased the final overall quality of the dissertation while also never limiting my freedom in developing the argument I was pursuing. I am thankful for Dr. Anthony Steinbock, who accepted without hesitations to be part of my dissertation committee and thus made this project possible. My heartfelt thank you goes also to the many librarians and administrative assistant at Duquesne University for their continuous help during the dissertation process. During the years of doctoral work in Pittsburgh, I have had the honor and privilege to meet several special people, who made this city feel like my home, in particular: Robyn, Peter, and their family; Ann and Jude; Dave and Mike; and Hanna. I would like to thank my parents and my sisters, who have always supported in many ways my choice to pursue the study of philosophy at home and away from home. A most special thank you goes to Dr. Ron Bruzina, who introduced my thoughts to Merleau-Ponty and to an entirely different dimension in philosophy. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract ....................................................................................................................................iv Dedication ................................................................................................................................. v Acknowledgement ...................................................................................................................vi Table of Contents .................................................................................................................. vii List of Abbreviations ...............................................................................................................xi Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Natura Sub Specie Structurae § 1. The Disinterested and the Interested Onlooker. .............................................................. 9 § 2. Naturizing and Naturized Consciousness ...................................................................... 17 § 3. Phenomenology between Husserl and Merleau-Ponty ................................................. 22 Chapter 2: Pathway to Nature: Operative Intentionality from Husserl to Merleau- Ponty § 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 28 § 1.a. How Merleau-Ponty Came to Phenomenology: The Notion of “Operative Intentionality” ................................................................... 29 § 1.b. Cartesian “Realism” ..................................................................................................... 35 § 1.c. Operative Intentionality ............................................................................................... 38 § 1.d. Brief Methodic Reflection on the “Idea of Being” in Phenomenology .................... 43 § 1.e. The Prejudice of the World.......................................................................................... 46 § 1.f. Operative Intentionality as Temporalizing.................................................................. 50 vii § 2. The Project of the Phenomenology of Perception as Enquiry into Operative Intentionality........................................................................ 52 § 2.a. The Discovery of Contingency and Transcendental Philosophy: Descartes and Kant....................................................................................................... 55 § 2.b. The Embodied Subject: Phenomenology of Perception I .......................................... 60 § 2.c. Note on Husserl’s Ideas II: The Regressive Undoing of Self-Forgetfulness § 2.c.i. Body Oddity ............................................................................................................... 64 § 2.c.ii. Husserl on the Intuition of Space ............................................................................. 68 § 2.d. The Notion of Spatial Level: Phenomenology of Perception II ................................ 72 § 2.e. The Kantian Notion of a Level of All Levels and the General Level of Experience .......................................................................... 77 § 2.f. The Phenomenological Conception of “Natural Sign” .............................................. 80 Chapter 3: Orders of Experience: World-Horizon and the Apperception § 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 84 § 1.a. Husserl and the Notion of Earth .................................................................................. 88 § 1.b. The Modalization of the World and the Natural Attitude ......................................... 91 § 2. The Theory of Integration and the Notion of Apperception......................................... 96 § 3. Historical Note on the Notion of Apperception ..........................................................103 § 3.a. Maine de Biran’s Theory of the Fact of Consciousness ..........................................106 Chapter 4: Mundus Sensibilis: Structure, Passage, Movement § 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................113 § 1.a. Ontic Structural Realism ............................................................................................114 § 1.b. Syntactic and Semantic Views ..................................................................................117 viii § 1.c. Invariance between Physics and Phenomenology ....................................................119 § 1. d. Physics Deformalized ...............................................................................................122 § 1.f. Observation and Objectivation ..................................................................................124 § 2. Note on A. N. Whitehead .............................................................................................127 § 3. Natural Dynamis between Physics and Perception .....................................................135 § 4. The Praxis of Nature, or What the Things Do .............................................................139 Chapter 5: Nature and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On the Methodological Role of Marxism in Merleau-Ponty's
    On the Methodological Role of Marxism in Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology Abstract While contemporary scholarship on Merleau-Ponty virtually overlooks his postwar existential Marxism, this paper argues that the conception of history contained in the latter plays a signifi- cant methodological role in supporting the notion of truth that operates within Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenological analyses of embodiment and the perceived world. This is because this con- ception regards the world as an unfinished task, such that the sense and rationality attributed to its historical emergence conditions the phenomenological evidence used by Merleau-Ponty. The result is that the content of Phenomenology of Perception should be seen as implicated in the normative framework of Humanism and Terror. Keywords: Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology, Methodology, Marxism, History On the Methodological Role of Marxism in Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology In her 2007 book Merleau-Ponty and Modern Politics after Anti-Humanism, Diana Coole made the claim (among others) that Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology is “profoundly and intrinsically political,”1 and in particular that it would behoove readers of his work to return to the so-called ‘communist question’ as he posed it in the immediate postwar period.2 For reasons that basical- ly form the substance of this paper, I think that these claims are generally correct and well- taken. But this is in spite of the fact that they go very distinctly against the grain of virtually all contemporary scholarship on Merleau-Ponty. For it is the case that very few scholars today – and this is particularly true of philosophers – have any serious interest in the political dimen- sions of Merleau-Ponty’s work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Temporal Structure of Patience MICHAEL R
    PhænEx 13, no. 2 (Winter 2020): 86-102 © 2020 Michael R. Kelly The Temporal Structure of Patience MICHAEL R. KELLY Phenomenology’s technical terminology can often seem to invalidate the natural attitude phenomenology aims to elucidate. One notable exception to this worry is Moral Emotions: Reclaiming the Evidence of the Heart, in which Anthony Steinbock remains faithful to, and profoundly elucidates, the lived-experience of moral emotions, describing the how and the what of emotive acts such as pride, shame, repentance, hope, etc. (Kelly). Steinbock’s work in general reveals a practicing phenomenologist who “liberates the ‘matters’ that we experience so that what they are … and their very appearing are not taken for granted in the experience” (Moral Emotions 17-18). Precise and meticulous concrete analyses of the intentional structure of everyday life (the natural attitude) pervade his writings. In his introduction to Moral Emotions, Steinbock specifically notes the importance of dwelling on the everyday: [S]ometimes … mundane examples … may be elucidating … [I]n the phenomenological method, the very simplicity and commonness of the example is no longer taken for granted in using it as an example, and to this extent, its immediacy is transcended in the direction of that which enables the situation to arise as such, toward the originality of the very banality. By bringing such common examples into focus … we go beyond the commonness of the example, and this opens a new world of meaning … that was taken for granted. The point is to see the fundamental … mystery in the ordinary but now as it is taken for granted.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook of Phenomenological Aesthetics Contributions to Phenomenology
    HANDBOOK OF PHENOMENOLOGICAL AESTHETICS CONTRIBUTIONS TO PHENOMENOLOGY IN COOPERATION WITH THE CENTER FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY Volume 59 Series Editors: Nicolas de Warren, Wellesley College, MA, USA Dermot Moran, University College Dublin, Ireland. Editorial Board: Lilian Alweiss, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland Elizabeth Behnke, Ferndale, WA, USA Rudolf Bernet, Husserl-Archief, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium David Carr, Emory University, GA, USA Chan-Fai Cheung, Chinese University Hong Kong, China James Dodd, New School University, NY, USA Lester Embree, Florida Atlantic University, FL, USA Alfredo Ferrarin, Università di Pisa, Italy Burt Hopkins, Seattle University, WA, USA Kwok-Ying Lau, Chinese University Hong Kong, China Nam-In Lee, Seoul National University, Korea Dieter Lohmar, Universität zu Köln, Germany William R. McKenna, Miami University, OH, USA Algis Mickunas, Ohio University, OH, USA J.N. Mohanty, Temple University, PA, USA Junichi Murata, University of Tokyo, Japan Thomas Nenon, The University of Memphis, TN, USA Thomas M. Seebohm, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Germany Gail Soffer, Rome, Italy Anthony Steinbock, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, IL, USA Shigeru Taguchi, Yamagata University, Japan Dan Zahavi, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Richard M. Zaner, Vanderbilt University, TN, USA Scope The purpose of the series is to serve as a vehicle for the pursuit of phenomenological research across a broad spectrum, including cross-over developments with other fields of inquiry such as the social sciences and cognitive science. Since its establishment in 1987, Contributions to Phenomenology has published nearly 60 titles on diverse themes of phenomenological philosophy. In addition to welcoming monographs and collections of papers in established areas of scholarship, the series encourages original work in phenomenology.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 SPEP Program (Rochester
    SOCIETY FOR PHENOMENOLOGY AND EXISTENTIAL PHILOSOPHY Executive Co-Directors Anthony Steinbock, Southern Illinois University Carbondale Amy Allen, Dartmouth College Executive Committee Amy Allen, Dartmouth College Alia Al-Saji, McGill University Fred Evans, Duquesne University Brian Schroeder, Rochester Institute of Technology Anthony Steinbock, Southern Illinois University Carbondale Shannon Mussett, Utah Valley University, Secretary-Treasurer Graduate Assistant Christopher C. Paone, Southern Illinois University Carbondale Advisory Book Selection Committee Shannon Winnubst, The Ohio State University, Chair Ann V. Murphy, Fordham University Brad Elliott Stone, Loyola Marymount University Adrian Johnston, University of New Mexico David Carr, Emory University Brent Adkins, Roanoke College Daniela Vallega-Neu, Univeristy of Oregon James D. Hatley, Salisbury University Advocacy Committee Robin James, University of North Carolina Charlotte, Chair Peter Gratton, Memorial University of Newfoundland Gail Weiss, George Washington University Committee on the Status of Women Laura Hengehold, Case Western Reserve University, Chair Shannon Sullivan, The Pennsylvania State University Elaine Miller, Miami University of Ohio Racial and Ethnic Diversity Committee Falguni Sheth, Hampshire College, Chair Hernando Estévez, John Jay College/CUNY Devonya Havis, Canisius College LGBTQ Advocacy Committee Robert Vallier, Institut d’Études Politiques, Chair William Wilkerson, University of Alabama Huntsville Mary Bloodsworth-Lugo, Washington State University Webmaster Christopher P. Long, The Pennsylvania State University Local Arrangements Contacts Brian Schroeder, local contact and organizer, [email protected] Scott Campbell, book exhibit coordinator, [email protected] Lindsey Johnson, student volunteer coordinator, [email protected] All SPEP sessions will be held at the Rochester Riverside Convention Center (RRCC) on 123 East Main St., Rochester, NY. The RRCC is adjacent to the host hotel, the Hyatt Regency Rochester, to which it is connected by an enclosed skyway.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Anthony Steinbock's CV
    Anthony J. Steinbock Department of Philosophy Stony Brook University Stony Brook, NY 11794 Office: (631) 632-7570 Email: [email protected] ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS: ñ Stony Brook University, Professor of Philosophy, Director, Phenomenology Research Center, fall, 2019 - present ñ Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Interim Chair, Dept. of Philosophy (2017-present) ñ 1999 – Present Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Professor with Tenure, Department of Philosophy. Graduate Faculty ñ 1995 – 99 Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy. Graduate Faculty ñ 1994 – 95 University of New Hampshire, Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy ñ 1992 – 94 State University of New York at Stony Brook, Lecturer, Department of Philosophy HONORARY APPOINTMENT • Honorary Professor of Australian Catholic University 2013 – present DIRECTOR: Phenomenology Research Center (PRC): Stony Brook University 2019- present Phenomenology Research Center (PRC): SIU Carbondale 2009—2019 VISITING PROFESSOR: ñ November, 2018 Liu Boming Lectures: “Key Insights in the History of Phenomenology: the Other,” Department of Philosophy, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, P. R. China ñ March 12- May 15, 2015 Université Bordeaux Montaigne, “La phénoménologie des émotions,” Bordeaux, France ñ March 21- March 27, 2012 Trnava University, Department of Philosophy, “The Moral Emotions,” Trnava, Slovakia ñ March 1- March 25, 2010 Center for Subjectivity Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark ñ March 5 – April 2, 2008 Center for Subjectivity Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark 1 EDUCATION: ñ 1985 – 1993 SUNY AT STONY BROOK, Stony Brook, New York, Ph.D. Philosophy (1993) ñ 1989 – 1990 L’ECOLE DES HAUTES ETUDES EN SCIENCES SOCIALES, Paris, France ñ 1987 – 1989 RUHR-UNIVERSITÄT BOCHUM, Bochum, Germany ñ 1981 – 1983 DEPAUL UNIVERSITY, Chicago, Illinois, M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Degruyter Opth Opth-2020-0103 587..605 ++
    Open Theology 2020; 6: 587–605 Phenomenology of Religious Experience IV: Religious Experience and Description Jan Černý* To Hear the Sound of One’s Own Birth: Michel Henry on Religious Experience https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0103 received April 02, 2020; accepted September 10, 2020 Abstract: The article consists of two parts. The first part outlines two conceptions of religious experience that can be found in the last three philosophical books of Michel Henry: the first, broad conception of religious experience is connected with the transcendental relation of human self to God as proposed by Henry; the second, narrower conception concerns the story of salvation as told in Henry’s Christian trilogy, and acquires the form of the “second birth.” Yet the transcendental disposition of Henry’s phenomenology prevents it from developing hermeneutical tools that would guide the understanding of religious experi- ence. The second part of the article deals with the critique of Dominique Janicaud, who questioned the phenomenological methodology of Michel Henry precisely because of its religious overtone, and with the subsequent discussion incited by Janicaud’s criticism. The article defends the phenomenological status of Henry’s work by arguing that Henry’s thinking could not be rightly accused from being theological or metaphysical at the time of the publication of Janicaud’s first critique. Yet it is true that the later Christian trilogy identified the general structures of appearing with the inner life of the God of the Christian Bible, and the experience of Christian faith thus became the presupposition of Henry’s phenomenology. The article also argues that religious experience belongs to the field of phenomenological research.
    [Show full text]
  • Heidegger, Renaud Barbaras, and the Phenomenology of Desire Introduction
    © Christos Hadjioannou, 13 June 2013. Paper delivered at Phenomenology’s Presence, the 4th Annual Phenomenology 1 Conference at the University of Sussex (UK). Unpublished paper. Heidegger, Renaud Barbaras, and the phenomenology of desire Introduction The interplay between presence and absence has always been an important theme in phenomenology, especially in the hermeneutic phenomenology of Martin Heidegger.1 This interplay has also been an important topic in other strands of philosophy, notably the ones that take Hegelian dialectics as their point of departure, fostering a particular understanding of (human) life as subjectivity; a subject whose life is moved by virtue of desire: desire to perceive, to understand and/or to incorporate the external object. As such, desire betrays a being that is finite, insufficient and incomplete. It is a subject characterized by lack. It is generally considered that Heidegger doesn’t have an account of desire2. It is assumed that the notion of desire is ignored by Heidegger, because it is historically tied up with subjectivity and thus doesn’t fit his existential analytic of Dasein. Instead of desire, we have an account of mood [Stimmung]. Whenever we look for the way factical Dasein moves and discloses presence and absence on the pre-reflective level, we encounter Angst.3 In this paper I have two modest aims: Firstly, I will try to present some of the main arguments of the contemporary French phenomenologist, Renaud Barbaras (Sorbonne), who tries to articulate a phenomenology of desire. The prospect is to try to bring Barbaras in fruitful dialogue with the young Heidegger, because I am of the opinion that at some point Heidegger did what Barbaras tries to do today.4 The philosophical problems that inform Barbaras’s phenomenology pose a possible entry point into raising some questions and trying to attain a better understanding of some early Heideggerian notions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mgr. Martin Ritter, Ph.D. Into the World. the Movement of Patočka's
    Univerzita Karlova Fakulta humanitních studií Mgr. Martin Ritter, Ph.D. Into the World. The Movement of Patočka’s Phenomenology Habilitační práce Praha 2019 1 2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction................................................................................... 5 Part I. The Developments of Patočka’s Phenomenology ........... 13 2 Seeking Evidence ........................................................................ 15 3 Hubris of Transcendental Idealism ........................................... 21 4 Life of Inwardness ...................................................................... 31 5 Basically Negative Being in the World ...................................... 41 6 Call of Transcendence ................................................................ 49 7 At the Heart of Space ................................................................. 59 8 Movement of Existence ............................................................... 69 9 Asubjective Phenomenology ...................................................... 77 Part II. Rethinking Existence ....................................................... 89 10 (Dis)Appropriating (the) Body ................................................ 91 11 Performing the Soul through Movement .............................. 101 12 Thinking (A)subjectivity through Mediality ........................ 113 13 Passing Through the World (as) Crisis ................................. 127 14 Super-Civilized Existence ...................................................... 141 15 Omnia
    [Show full text]
  • Phenomenology and Experience
    Phenomenology and Experience New Perspectives Edited by Antonio Cimino Cees Leijenhorst LEIDEN | BOSTON For use by the Author only | © 2019 Koninklijke Brill NV <UN> Contents Acknowledgments vii Notes on Contributors viii Phenomenology and Experience: A Brief Historico-Philosophical Introduction 1 Antonio Cimino and Cees Leijenhorst What is Diaphenomenology? A Sketch 12 Emmanuel Alloa Transcendental Experience 28 Bernardo Ainbinder Encountering Finitude: On the Hermeneutic Radicalization of Experience 46 Jussi Backman Poverty and Promise: Towards a Primordial Hermeneutic Experience 63 Gert-Jan van der Heiden Experience and Unity in Husserl’s Solution to the Crisis 81 Lorenzo Girardi Forgetfulness of Experience: Ideality and Necessity in Merleau-Ponty’s Reading of Husserl’s “Origin of Geometry” 99 Diego D’Angelo Conditions of Historical Experience: Husserlian Reflections 114 Timo Miettinen Motives in Experience: Pfänder, Geiger, and Stein 129 Genki Uemura and Alessandro Salice Experience and Normativity: The Phenomenological Approach 150 Sophie Loidolt For use by the Author only | © 2019 Koninklijke Brill NV <UN> vi Contents The Specificity of Medium: Painting and Thinking in Merleau-Ponty’s “Eye and Mind” 166 Nicolas de Warren Pregnant Embodiment as World Transformation 185 Tanja Staehler Index of Names and Subjects 201 For use by the Author only | © 2019 Koninklijke Brill NV <UN> Conditions of Historical Experience: Husserlian Reflections Timo Miettinen We ourselves have developed historically; as historians we ourselves cre- ate world history and world science in every sense […]. The world for us is itself a historical structure belonging to us, who are ourselves in our being a historical structure. edmund husserl, The Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology1 1 Introduction Historical experience is a fundamentally modern idea that has referred to at least two competing doctrines.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives. Volume 6. 2016
    Perspectives. International Postgraduate Journal of Philosophy 2016; 6(1): 4–12 2016 1. September 6, Issue Vol. Perspectives, Perspectives:Perspectives. InternationalPerspectives. International International Postgraduate Postgraduate Postgraduate Journal Journal ofJournal Philosophyof Philosophy of PhilosophyEditorial 2016; 2016; 6(1): 6(1)1–3 3 Open Access PERSPECTIVESEditorialphilosophy concerning primate beliefs where it is argued that non-human animals do notOpen have Access beliefs because beliefs are propositional (e.g., Davidson 1975, 1982). The author offers two arguments against InternationalAustin Dwyer, Meline Postgraduate Papazian, David Journal Markwell of Philosophy a propositional model, an a priori argument from referential opacity and an empirical argument from Interviews Vol. 6, Issue 1 September 2016 varieties of working memory. Secondly, the Prior-Lurz situational model is introduced with modifications. TheEditorial author suggests that with this model, some progress is possible in understanding certain mindreading DOI 10.1515/pipjp-2016-0002 capacities of other primates. This issue closes with a book review of Anthony Steinbock’s Moral Emotions: Reclaiming the Evidence DOI 10.1515/pipjp-2016-0001 of the Heart by David Markwell. In his review Markwell praises Steinbock’s project of carving out a space Professor Anthony Chemero for emotions in moral discourse while remaining critical of Steinbock’s chosen ‘moral emotions’ and their Anthony Chemero is Professor of Philosophy and Psychology and a core member of the Center
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE Mark B Tanzer, Ph.D. January 2016 Professor University of Colorado Denver Department of Philosophy Box 179, P.O. Box 173364 Denver, Colorado 80217-3364 (303)556-6373, Fax:(303)556-8100 EDUCATION: Institution Date Degree Major SUNY @ Stony Brook 1992 Ph.D Philosophy Boston College 1985 M.A. Philosophy University of Pennsylvania 1982 B.A. Philosophy PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 2010-present Professor, University of Colorado Denver 2003-2007 Philosophy Dept. Chair, University of Colorado Denver 2000-2010 Associate Professor, University of Colorado Denver 1993-2000 Assistant Professor, University of Colorado Denver 1990-1993 Honorarium Instructor, University of Colorado Denver 1991-1993 Honorarium Instructor, Metropolitan State College 1992-1993 Instructor, Columbia College, Aurora, Colorado 1991-1992 Instructor, Arapahoe Community College 1985-1989 Teaching Assistant, SUNY @ Stony Brook REFEREED PUBLICATIONS: A. Books: 2008 On Existentialism, Wadsworth Publishing Company. 2002 Heidegger, Decisionism, and Quietism, Humanity Books. B. Articles: 2016 “Heidegger on Animality and Anthropocentrism,” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, forthcoming. 2015 “Heidegger on Kant’s Definition of Being,” Journal of Philosophical Research, vol. 40. 2006 “Heidegger on A Priori Synthetic Judgments,” Heidegger Studies, vol. 22, 93-110. 2005 “Heidegger and McDowell on Kant’s Spontaneous Receptivity,” Philosophy Today, SPEP Supplement, 166-174. 2003 “On the Viability of Dreyfus’s Heidegger,” Studies in Practical Philosophy, vol. 4, no. 1, 146-159. 2001 “Heidegger on Freedom and Practical Judgment,” Journal of Philosophical Research, vol. 26, 343-357. 2000 “Heidegger on the Origin of the Political,” Existentia, vol. X, 29-40. 2000 “Heidegger on Humanism and Action,” Southwest Philosophy Review, vol. 16, no.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sophic Phenomenology of Invariant Vitalism
    1 Anthony Paul Smith ‘The Mother of God – the Damp Earth’: A Sophic Phenomenology of Invariant Vitalism Our contemporary climate, in both the literal and metaphoric senses, is determined by three forces: the capitalist victory that demands everything reduce its value to the quantitative measure of money, the ideology of scientism which says all truth is reducible to the mechanics that science can alone elucidate, and the resurgence of ‘fundamentalist’ religion unmoored by theological or religious metaphysics. In the humanities these determinations go unchecked by an apolitical and aneconomic anti- metaphysical Anglo-American philosophy, both the reaction in “Continental philosophy” threatening to solidify into a narrow neo-rationalism against the anti-science occultism of Heideggerian philosophy and its kin, the continued naïve idealism of English department appropriations of deconstruction, and the self-perpetuated captivity of theology both to positivist scientism and the ghettos of identity politics. What unites all of this is a certain refusal of the perversity of nature. Nature appears to be purposely deviating from what is accepted as good, proper, or reasonable in democratic societies. Nature itself appears to be refusing to go away, to separate itself off from ‘culture’ and the human person, and insists on inhering to every part of culture and in every human person. This paper is an attempt to think differently from within the humanities; to think a strange economic ecology of life, or invariant vitalism, which lies at the heart
    [Show full text]