DOCSLIB.ORG

Art Bulletin, 74.4 (Dec. 1992)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Art Bulletin, 74.4 (Dec. 1992) 1992 Mark Antliff. “Cubism, Celtisms, and the Body Politic.” Art Bulletin , 74.4 (Dec. 1992): 655-68. Print. The author shows how Bergsono’s philosophy was used to support Celtic left-wing nationalism in Brittany (via Putteau cubism). David Ayers. Wyndham Lewis and Western Man . New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992: 251. Print. See Ch. II, “Bergson,” 16-29. The author states: “But it is paradoxically Bergson who is central, to any consideration of how Lewis conceives the self. Although Bergson is usually treated with hostile scorn, particularly in Time and Western Man , his work provides Lewis with an essential conceptual framework” (p. 16). Ernesto Ballesteros Arranz. Presencia de Schopenhauer . Cuenca, Spain: Ediciones de la Universidad Castilla-La Mancha, 1992: 76. Humanidades, 2. Print. The author deals with Bergson and Jean Piaget in relation to Schopenhauer. Eng. Trans. The Presence of Schopenhauer. Karen Dean Benson. “Education as Developing Self: The Importance of Feeling and Intuition.” Diss. U of California-Berkeley, 1992: 499. UMI no. AAC 9304857. DAI, 53.10 (1993). Print. The author states in her abstract: “Drawing upon Jung, Langer, Bergson, and Noddings, the feeling and intuiting components as educationally neglected aspects of the self are investigated within the formulation of a self that is at once universalistic in nature but also admits of a variety of cultural and individual elements” (p. 3470). Henri Bergson, Lettere a Xavier Léon e ad altri . Ed. Renzo Ragghianti. Napoli: Bibliopolis, 1992, 187. (Instituto Italiano per Gli Studi Filosofici, Serie Testi, 12) This consists of heretofore unpublished letters by Bergson to the editor of the Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale (Xavier Léon). Letters to the Marchesa Arconati-Visconti, Lionel Dauriac, Henri Delacroix, Flori Delattre, Maurice Guyot, Elie Halévy, Émile Meyerson, Victor Monod, Desiré Roustan, and Lev Sestov are also included. All letters are cited separately in the text of this bibliography in the section By Bergson. The editor provides both an introduction to this correspondence and explanatory footnotes to the letters. All letters by Bergson in this item appear independently in the section of this bibliography titled By Bergson . David Blitz. Emergent Evolution: Qualitative Novelty and the Levels of Reality . Boston: Kluwer Academic Pub., 1992: 239. Episteme, 19. Print. See “Lloyd Morgan on Bergson,” pp. 91-93. The author notes the comparative psychologist and philosopher Lloyd Morgan’s examination of Bergson’s views in Instinct and Experience (1912) and his (still unpublished) correspondence with Bergson (see p. 201). For unpublished notes by Morgan on Bergson see p. 121. On p. 92 he presents notes taken by Lloyd Morgan on Bergson’s philosophy, asserting that for Morgan Deity is the source of evolution, not the élan vital . See pp. 94-95 for Morgan’s response to Bergson’s critique of Herbert Spencer. See pp. 88-90 for Bergson’s influence on Marvin T. Harris. The author presents Bergson’s philosophy as having had a crucial impact on Morgan at a critical juncture in his thought. Martha Braun. Picturing Time: The Work of Etienne-Jules Marey (1830-1904) . Chicago: U of Chicago Press, 1992: 450. Print. On pp. 278-82 the author notes Bergson’s acquaintanceship with Marey at the Collège de France and elsewhere, noting the incompatibility of Bergsonian duration with Marey’s cinematographic concepts. See innumerable other references to Bergson in the text. Frederick Burwick and Paul Douglass, eds. The Crisis in Modernism: Bergson and the Vitalist Controversy . Cambridge and New York: Cambridge UP, 1992: 405. Print. Part 1 of this work presents the historical background of vitalism, beginning with the enlightenment. Part 2 explores vitalism in the twentieth-century philosophy and science. Part 3 explores vitalism in twentieth- century literature and aeasthetics. In their introduction (pp. 1-12) the editors situate Bergson in relation to vitalism and to modern philosophy more generally. They conclude: “Bergson, so vehemently cast out, has returned as an element in human thought. In what senses? Why?” (p. 11). Essays in this book concerned with Bergson are presented separately in this bibliography (1992). Mili č Čapek. “Microphysical Indeterminacy and Freedom: Bergson and Peirce” in The Crisis of Vitalism: Bergson and the Vitalist Congroversy. Eds. Frederick Burwick and Paul Douglass. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge UP, 1992: 171-89. Print. This essay is reprinted from the author, 1971. Čapek here argues that Bergson’s insights into the relations between matter and memory have proved far more relevant than any theorist of the 1920s would have allowed. Bergson’s theories of causation, interactionism, and degrees of freedom now appear prophetic forecasts of directions in physics. See also the author’s comments on the naïve vitalisms of P. Jordan and W. Elsasser. Joseph Chiari. “Vitalism and Contemporary Thought” in The Crisis in Modernism: Bergson and the Vitalist Controversy . Eds. Frederick Burwick and Paul Douglass. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge UP, 1992: 245-73. Print. In this sprawling essay, written shortly before his death, the author condemns mechanism, arguing for the reality of spirit. Mechanism does not capture the essence of life. Intuition lies behind scientific conceptualization. María Estrella Cibreiro-Couce. “Narative Time: Memory, History, Myth in the Contemporary Spanish Novel.” Diss. U of Connecticut, 1992: 184. DAI , 53.06 (1992): 1936. Print. The author uses Henri Bergson’s “theories of interior, subjective time” to analyze the role played by time in the works of three Spanish novelists: G. Juan, M. G. Carmen, and B. Juan. Argentina Pearl Daley. “Resonant Fragments: Representations of Temporality in Jack London’s Short Stories.” Diss. U of Washington, 1992: 443. DAI , 53.12 (1992): 39. Print. The author’s abstract states: “Using Henri Bergson’s theory of duration… I explore the formal development of the modern lyric short story in terms of multiplicity and temporal flux…” Bernard Delfgaaw. Denkwegen: essays . Kampen: Kok Agora Kapellen; DNB Pelckmans, 1992: 164. Agora. Eng. Trans. Ways of Thought: Essays. Jeanne Delhomme. Nietzsche et Bergson . Pref. Claire Salomon-Bayet. Paris: Deuxtemps Tierce, 1992: 167. Littératures, 2. Print. Paul Douglass. “Deleuze and the Endurance of Bergson.” Thought , 66.264 (Mar. 1992): 47-61. Print. The author explores the extent to which G. Deleuze has both taken over and used distinctions found in Bergson and given us a “new” Bergson, based on Bergson’s psychological and evolutionary thought but excluding his later ethical and religious reflections. (By contrast, Charles Hartshorne acclaims Bergson’s later thought, categorically dismisses his earlier psychological and evolutionary ideas. Ed.) For Deleuze Bergson is the creator of a new method which avoids false problems and takes “difference,” “multiplicity,” “temporality” seriously. Bergson is a decisive precursor of today’s “post-structural turn.” For the author’s abstract of this article see Philosopher’s Index , 26.4 (1992): 106. Print. Paul Douglass. “Deleuze’s Bergson: Bergson Redux” in The Crisis in Modernism: Bergson and the Vitalist Controvery . Eds. Frederick Burwick and Paul Douglass. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge UP, 1992: 368-88. Print. For annotation see the author, “Deleuze and…” (1992). See also the author’s abstract in Philosopher’s Index, 27.2 (1993): 9. Print. Gerard Droesser. Freiheitspraxis im Prozess: zur geschichtsanthropologischen Grundlegung einer Theologie des Ethischen . Frankfurt am Main; New York: P. Lang, 1992: 3 vols., 1396 pp. Forum Interdisziplinäre Ethik, Bd. 4. Print. This was originally presented as the author’s Ph.D. thesis at the U of Tübingen, 1988. Eng. Trans. The Practice of Freedom in Process: Towards a Historical- Anthropological Foundation of a Theology of Ethics . Emeric Fiser. La Théorie du symbole littéraire et Marcel Proust . Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 1992: 223. This item was published originally in 1941 as Le Symbole littéraire . Eng. Trans. The Theory of the Literary Symbol and Marcel Proust . Jeffrey Jay Gaines. “The Habitual Body – Subject: A Study in Descartes and the Biran-Bergson-Merleau- Ponty Lineage.” Diss. State U of New York, 1992: 349. UMI no. AAC 9310010. DAI , 53.12 (1993): 4350. The author states in his abstract: “Descartes also developed a sense of mind-body unity, of the fusion of mental and physical habits, and of a continuous, cumulative and progressive time. These ‘minor’ themes of Descartes’s philosophy were taken up and progressively enriched by Maine de Biran, Henri Bergson, and Maurice Merleau-Ponty… These later thinkers conceived of a “body-subject” that, by virtue of the personal and social habits it acquires and modifies, is able to responsibly engage in traditions it continues, renews, and overturns.” Giancarlo Galeazzi, ed. I cattolici e la lotta all’antisemitismo: A cinquant’anni dallas legislazione razziale italiani . Milano: Massimo, 1992: ill., 158. Print. This item contains an essay by Giancarlo Galeazzi titled “Bergson e Raissa Maritain di fronte all’antisemitismo,” pp. 66-76. Eng. Trans. “Bergson and Raissa Maritain Confronting Antisemitism.” Marcel Gauchet. L’Inconscient cérébral. Paris: Seuil, 1992: 216. La Librairie du XX e siècle. Print. The author pursues a philosophical history of the status of the brain and the unconscious at the end of the nineteenth century. Eng. Trans. The Cerebral Unconscious. Bernard Gilson. La révision bergsonienne de la philosophie
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Taylor & Francis Not for Distribution
    Template: Royal A, Font: , Date: 11/07/2011; 3B2 version: 9.1.406/W Unicode (May 24 2007) (APS_OT) Dir: //integrafs1/kcg/2-Pagination/TandF/RCRS/ApplicationFiles/9780415492447.3d 3URRI (iii) Complexity, emergence, and eliminativism 7D\ORU )UDQFLV 1RWIRUGLVWULEXWLRQ 3URRI Template: Royal A, Font: , Date: 11/07/2011; 3B2 version: 9.1.406/W Unicode (May 24 2007) (APS_OT) Dir: //integrafs1/kcg/2-Pagination/TandF/RCRS/ApplicationFiles/9780415492447.3d 3URRI 7D\ORU )UDQFLV 1RWIRUGLVWULEXWLRQ 3URRI Template: Royal A, Font: , Date: 11/07/2011; 3B2 version: 9.1.406/W Unicode (May 24 2007) (APS_OT) Dir: //integrafs1/kcg/2-Pagination/TandF/RCRS/ApplicationFiles/9780415492447.3d 3URRI 18 ELIMINATIVISM, COMPLEXITY, AND EMERGENCE Terrence Deacon and Tyrone Cashman The emergence paradox The evolutionary perspective turned the classic worldview on its head. Since Roman times, the world was understood to be hierarchic in structure, explained by a transcen- dent mind at the top. From there, the great chain of being cascaded down through angels, humans, frogs, protozoa, and finally stones. Inverting the chain of being switched mind from being7D\ORU )UDQFLV the ultimate explanation of things, to being the mystery to be explained. As an early critic of Darwin protested, this theory assumes that “Absolute Ignorance” is the ultimate artificer, even of life and mind (MacKenzie 1868). However, the1RWIRUGLVWULEXWLRQ notion that the distinctive properties of life and mind were pro- duced by a blind mechanism from inanimate matter runs counter to a fundamental assumption of Western thought. It is expressed in the oft-quoted dictum of the Roman poet–scientist Lucretius: “ex nihilo nihil fit,” from nothing, nothing [can be] produced (1994 [n.d.]).
    [Show full text]
  • New Yorkers Had Been Anticipating His Visit for Months. at Columbia
    INTRODUCTION ew Yorkers had been anticipating his visit for months. At Columbia University, where French intellectual Henri Bergson (1859–1941) Nwas to give twelve lectures in February 1913, expectations were es- pecially high. When first approached by officials at Columbia, he had asked for a small seminar room where he could directly interact with students and faculty—something that fit both his personality and his speaking style. But Columbia sensed a potential spectacle. They instead put him in the three- hundred-plus-seat lecture theater in Havemeyer Hall. That much attention, Bergson insisted, would make him too nervous to speak in English without notes. Columbia persisted. So, because rhetorical presentation was as impor- tant to him as the words themselves, Bergson delivered his first American lec- ture entirely in French.1 Among the standing-room-only throng of professors and editors were New York journalists and “well-dressed” and “overdressed” women, all fumbling to make sense of Bergson’s “Spiritualité et Liberté” that slushy evening. Between their otherwise dry lines of copy, the reporters’ in- credulity was nearly audible as they recorded how hundreds of New Yorkers strained to hear this “frail, thin, small sized man with sunken cheeks” practi- cally whisper an entire lecture on metaphysics in French.2 That was only a prelude. Bergson’s “Free Will versus Determinism” lec- ture on Tuesday, February 4th—once again delivered in his barely audible French—caused the academic equivalent of a riot. Two thousand people attempted to cram themselves into Havemeyer. Hundreds of hopeful New Yorkers were denied access; long queues of the disappointed snaked around the building and lingered in the slush.
    [Show full text]
  • INTUITION .THE PHILOSOPHY of HENRI BERGSON By
    THE RHYTHM OF PHILOSOPHY: INTUITION ·ANI? PHILOSO~IDC METHOD IN .THE PHILOSOPHY OF HENRI BERGSON By CAROLE TABOR FlSHER Bachelor Of Arts Taylor University Upland, Indiana .. 1983 Submitted ~o the Faculty of the Graduate College of the · Oklahoma State University in partial fulfi11ment of the requirements for . the Degree of . Master of Arts May, 1990 Oklahoma State. Univ. Library THE RHY1HM OF PlllLOSOPHY: INTUITION ' AND PfnLoSOPlllC METHOD IN .THE PHILOSOPHY OF HENRI BERGSON Thesis Approved: vt4;;. e ·~lu .. ·~ests AdVIsor /l4.t--OZ. ·~ ,£__ '', 13~6350' ii · ,. PREFACE The writing of this thesis has bee~ a tiring, enjoyable, :Qustrating and challenging experience. M.,Bergson has introduced me to ·a whole new way of doing . philosophy which has put vitality into the process. I have caught a Bergson bug. His vision of a collaboration of philosophers using his intuitional m~thod to correct, each others' work and patiently compile a body of philosophic know: ledge is inspiring. I hope I have done him justice in my description of that vision. If I have succeeded and that vision catches your imagination I hope you Will make the effort to apply it. Please let me know of your effort, your successes and your failures. With the current challenges to rationalist epistemology, I believe the time has come to give Bergson's method a try. My discovery of Bergson is. the culmination of a development of my thought, one that started long before I began my work at Oklahoma State. However, there are some people there who deserv~. special thanks for awakening me from my ' "''' analytic slumber.
    [Show full text]
  • NYU Paris PHIL-UA 9026 C01, History of French Philosophy
    NYU Paris PHIL-UA 9026 C01, History of French philosophy Instructor Information ● Philippe Lusson ● office hours TBD ● [email protected] Course Information ● PHIL-UA 9026 C01 ● History of French Philosophy ● An overview of important developments in French philosophy from the 16th century to the 1960s. We will pay close attention this semester to the relationship between the self and others. We will look at the debates that followed the rediscovery of Ancient philosophy and the Copernican revolution with Descartes’ rationalist and individualistic philosophy, Condillac’s empiricist critique, whose role for language brings the self into a web of social relations, and the growing recognition of the problem of society with Rousseau. We will then look at Henri Bergson’s reaction to the rise of the empirical sciences in the 19th century and especially at his distinction between the deep self and the social self. We will deepen our appreciation of the issues Bergson highlights with readings from René Girard and Jean Baudrillard, and we will look for possible solutions in Alexandre Kojève’s reading of Hegel and in Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir’s distinctive development of existentialism. ● No prerequisites ● Lecture Tuesday 5 to 6:30pm, recitation sections Thursday 3-4:30pm and 5-6:30pm ● NYU Paris, room TBD Course Overview and Goals Upon Completion of this Course, students will be able to: ● get a sense of the historical evolution of philosophy since the 16th-century, ● see how French philosophers developed some of the key ideas and movements in that history ● identity and debate important issues philosophers still discuss today ● learn how to assess the strength and weaknesses of arguments, ● engage in constructive philosophical discussion, give reasons, and raise objections, Page 1 ● perfect their skills in argumentative writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Bergsoniana, 1
    Bergsoniana 1 | 2021 Reassessing Bergson The Duration of History in Bergson Caterina Zanfi Electronic version URL: https://journals.openedition.org/bergsoniana/435 DOI: 10.4000/bergsoniana.435 ISSN: 2800-874X Publisher Société des amis de Bergson Electronic reference Caterina Zanfi, “The Duration of History in Bergson ”, Bergsoniana [Online], 1 | 2021, Online since 01 July 2021, connection on 14 September 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/bergsoniana/435 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/bergsoniana.435 Les contenus de la revue sont mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. THE DURATION OF HISTORY IN BERGSON Caterina ZANFI I. Is There a Philosophy of History in Bergson? Bergson has often been criticised for not thinking history. Although he developed one of the most relevant philosophies of time of the last century, his rare statements on history are said to betray an impoverished sense of properly historical issues. Moreover, this criticism is made concerning both his consideration of history as the becoming of human reality and his consideration of historical knowledge and narrative — of both history and historiography. It was first articulated in the 1930s by Marxist intellectuals like Paul Nizan (who was to perish in the fight against Nazism in 1940). In 1932, Nizan published a polemic entitled The Watchdogs against the so called “Philosophers of the Established Order.” There he includes Bergson among the philosophers who are “against history” (Nizan 1965, 29),1 considering him incapable of understanding the time and space in which philosophical ideas arise and therefore lacking in sensitivity for the material and embodied aspects of the historical becoming of philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Heidegger, Renaud Barbaras, and the Phenomenology of Desire Introduction
    © Christos Hadjioannou, 13 June 2013. Paper delivered at Phenomenology’s Presence, the 4th Annual Phenomenology 1 Conference at the University of Sussex (UK). Unpublished paper. Heidegger, Renaud Barbaras, and the phenomenology of desire Introduction The interplay between presence and absence has always been an important theme in phenomenology, especially in the hermeneutic phenomenology of Martin Heidegger.1 This interplay has also been an important topic in other strands of philosophy, notably the ones that take Hegelian dialectics as their point of departure, fostering a particular understanding of (human) life as subjectivity; a subject whose life is moved by virtue of desire: desire to perceive, to understand and/or to incorporate the external object. As such, desire betrays a being that is finite, insufficient and incomplete. It is a subject characterized by lack. It is generally considered that Heidegger doesn’t have an account of desire2. It is assumed that the notion of desire is ignored by Heidegger, because it is historically tied up with subjectivity and thus doesn’t fit his existential analytic of Dasein. Instead of desire, we have an account of mood [Stimmung]. Whenever we look for the way factical Dasein moves and discloses presence and absence on the pre-reflective level, we encounter Angst.3 In this paper I have two modest aims: Firstly, I will try to present some of the main arguments of the contemporary French phenomenologist, Renaud Barbaras (Sorbonne), who tries to articulate a phenomenology of desire. The prospect is to try to bring Barbaras in fruitful dialogue with the young Heidegger, because I am of the opinion that at some point Heidegger did what Barbaras tries to do today.4 The philosophical problems that inform Barbaras’s phenomenology pose a possible entry point into raising some questions and trying to attain a better understanding of some early Heideggerian notions.
    [Show full text]
  • VADE ET TU FAC SIMILITER: from HIPPOCRATES to the GOOD SAMARITAN 69 AIDS As a Disease of the Body and the Spirit the Hippocratic Oath Robert C
    Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference organized by the Pontifical Council DOLENTIUM HOMINUM for Pastoral Assistance No. 31 (Year XI - No.1) 1996 JOURNAL OF THE to Health Care Workers PONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR PASTORAL ASSISTANCE TO HEALTH CARE WORKERS Editorial Board: FIORENZO Cardinal ANGELINI, Editor Rev. JOSÉ L. REDRADO O.H., Managing Editor Rev. FELICE RUFFINI M.I., Associate Editor Rev. GIOVANNI D’ERCOLE F.D.P. Vade et Tu Sr. CATHERINE DWYER M.M.M. Dr. GIOVANNI FALLANI Msgr. JESUS IRIGOYEN Rev. VITO MAGNO R.C.I. Fac Similiter: Ing. FRANCO PLACIDI Prof. GOTTFRIED ROTH From Hippocrates Msgr. ITALO TADDEI To the Good Editorial Staff: Rev. DAVID MURRAY M.ID. Samaritan MARIA ÁNGELES CABANA M.ID. Sr. M. GABRIELLE MULTIER Rev. JEAN-MARIE M. MPENDAWATU Editorial and Business Offices: Vatican City Telephone: 6988-3138, November 23-24-25, 6988-4720, 6988-4799, Telefax: 6988-3139 1995 Telex: 2031 SANITPC VA In copertina: glass-window P. Costantino Ruggeri Published three times a year: Subscription rate: one year Lire 60.000 (abroad or the corresponding amount in local currency, postage included). The price of this special issue is Lire 80,000 ($ 80) Printed by Editrice VELAR S.p.A., Gorle (BG) Paul VI Hall Vatican City Spedizione in abbonamento postale 50% Roma Contents 6 A Man Went Down to Jericho 42 Hippocrates in the Documents of the Greeting Addressed to the Holy Father Church and in Works of Theology by Cardinal Fiorenzo Angelini Gottfried Roth 7 Address by the 45 The Care of the Sick Holy Father in the History of the Church John
    [Show full text]
  • Antonio Rosmini on Property It Showed Itself As a Part of God’S Calling
    Journal of Markets & Morality Volume 7, Number 1 (Spring 2004): 63–97 Copyright © 2004 A Sphere Around Alberto Mingardi Policy Director the Person: Istituto Bruno Leoni (Turin, Italy) Antonio Rosmini and Visiting Fellow Centre for the New Europe on Property* (Brussels, Belgium) Father Antonio Rosmini-Serbati (1797–1855) is an author of growing interest and curiosity to his fellow churchmen, as well as to secular intellectuals, as a philosopher who successfully reconciled reason and faith. Nevertheless, the political nuances of his thought have barely been explored by English-speaking scholars, and even among his Italian followers these have not been fully appre- ciated. This article attempts to present an overview of Rosmini’s political philoso- phy, focusing on his concern for the protection of private property rights and arguing that it is precisely his advocacy of private property that determines his attitude toward the general organization of associated life, government, and democracy. The organization of this investigation consists of four parts. The first pro- vides a brief biographical sketch of Antonio Rosmini. The second tentatively enlists the main influences in the development of Rosmini’s thought as far as politics and economics are concerned. The third is devoted to examining his approach toward property. The fourth examines his definition of social justice in the light of his justification of property. Introduction In this article, I introduce the reader to the figure of Antonio Rosmini, provide a biographical sketch, and subsequently approach his thought on private prop- erty. As a priest and a devout Catholic, religious faith was central to every aspect of Rosmini’s philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Mgr. Martin Ritter, Ph.D. Into the World. the Movement of Patočka's
    Univerzita Karlova Fakulta humanitních studií Mgr. Martin Ritter, Ph.D. Into the World. The Movement of Patočka’s Phenomenology Habilitační práce Praha 2019 1 2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction................................................................................... 5 Part I. The Developments of Patočka’s Phenomenology ........... 13 2 Seeking Evidence ........................................................................ 15 3 Hubris of Transcendental Idealism ........................................... 21 4 Life of Inwardness ...................................................................... 31 5 Basically Negative Being in the World ...................................... 41 6 Call of Transcendence ................................................................ 49 7 At the Heart of Space ................................................................. 59 8 Movement of Existence ............................................................... 69 9 Asubjective Phenomenology ...................................................... 77 Part II. Rethinking Existence ....................................................... 89 10 (Dis)Appropriating (the) Body ................................................ 91 11 Performing the Soul through Movement .............................. 101 12 Thinking (A)subjectivity through Mediality ........................ 113 13 Passing Through the World (as) Crisis ................................. 127 14 Super-Civilized Existence ...................................................... 141 15 Omnia
    [Show full text]
  • Trinitizing the Universe: Teilhard's Theogenesis and the Dynamism Of
    Open Theology 2018; 4: 158–169 Intersubjectivity and Reciprocal Causality within Contemporary Understanding of the God-World Relationship Ilia Delio* Trinitizing the Universe: Teilhard’s Theogenesis and the Dynamism of Love https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0011 Received January 20, 2018; accepted January 24, 2018 Abstract: The God-world relationship bears an ambiguous relationship between God’s immanent life and God’s life in history. The development of the doctrine of the Trinity in the early Church gave rise to a distinction between theologia and oikonomia. Bonaventure’s theology sought to express an economic trinitarianism without compromising the integrity of God’s life, thus maintaining divine immutability and divine impassibility. Twentieth century trinitarian theologies challenge the notion of divine immutability in light of modern science and radical suffering. This paper develops on the heels of twentieth century theology by focusing in particular on the philosophical shifts rendered by modern science and technology. In particular, the insights of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin are explored with regard to Trinity and evolution, precisely because Teilhard intuited that evolution and the new physics evoke a radically new understanding of God. Building on Teilhard’s insights, I suggest that divine creative love is expressed in a fourth mystery which Teilhard called ‟pleromization.” Pleromization is the outflow of divine creative union or, literally, God filling the universe with divine life. Teilhard recapitulates this idea in the evolution of Christ so that theologia and oikonomia are one movement of divine love. My principal thesis is that the Trinity is integrally related to the world; the fullness of divine love includes the personalization of created reality, symbolized by the Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • Creation and the Theory of Evolution
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Boardman Lectureship in Christian Ethics Department of Religious Studies 4-24-1997 Creation and the Theory of Evolution Francisco J. Ayala University of California, Irvine Wolfhart Pannenberg University of Munich Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/boardman Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Ayala, Francisco J. and Pannenberg, Wolfhart, "Creation and the Theory of Evolution" (1997). Boardman Lectureship in Christian Ethics. 6. https://repository.upenn.edu/boardman/6 Boardman Lecture XXXV. Edited and Foreword by Susan Marks. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/boardman/6 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Creation and the Theory of Evolution Abstract The Boardman Lecture, in cooperation with the Center For Theology and The Natural Sciences and The John Templeton Foundation, funded a conference on Creation and Theory of Evolution. The conference explored religion and science by offering two different approaches to the question of human origins. Geneticist Francisco Ayala explains the present state of our understanding of evolution and argues that such human phenomena as morality and religion are by-products of the evolutionary process that cannot be explained by natural selection. His lecture appears as "The Evolutionary Transcendence of Humankind." Dr. Pannenberg stressed that the God of religious faith must be the Creator of the same nature that is studied by scientists. He explores aspects of the Genesis creation story that are compatible with the theory of evolution. His lecture is "Human Life: Creation Versus Evolution?" Disciplines Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Comments Boardman Lecture XXXV.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Time: a Slightly Opinionated Introduction
    Philosophy of time: A slightly opinionated introduction Florian Fischer There are several intertwined debates in the area of contemporary philos- ophy of time. One field of inquiry is the nature of time itself. Presentists think that only the present moment exists whereas eternalists believe that all of (space-)time exists on a par. The second main field of inquiry is the question of how objects persist through time. The endurantist claims that objects are three-dimensional wholes, which persist by being wholly1 present, whereas the perdurantist thinks that objects are four- dimensional and that their temporal parts are the bearers of properties. The third debate in the field of contemporary philosophy of time is about tense- versus tenseless theory. Tensers are at odds with detensers about the status of the linguistic reference to the present moment. These are only very crude characterizations and it is even disputed by some ad- vocates of the corresponding positions that they are accurate. However this very sketchy picture already reveals a fundamental difference: The eternalism/presentism and endurance/perdurance discussions belong to the field of metaphysics, whereas tense is in the first instance a linguistic phenomenon. Among the many fields of philosophy, there are two that are more intimately interconnected than most but whose practi- tioners have too long pursued relatively independent paths. On the one hand, there are philosophers of language, who have devoted much attention to indexicals (`now', etc.), tem- poral operators (`it has been the case that', etc.), and tensed sentences. On the other hand, there are the philosophers of tensed and tenseless time (also called A-time or B-time, dynamic time or static time, etc.).
    [Show full text]