DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents ORGANIZATION FOR SECURITY AND CO-OPERATION IN EUROPE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights “The Responsibility of States”: Protection of Human Rights Defenders in the OSCE Region (2014–2016) Implementation of the international standards outlined in the ODIHR Guidelines on the Protection of Human Rights Defenders 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 4 Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 9 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 13 International Standards: The ODIHR Guidelines on the Protection of Human Rights Defenders ............................................................................................................. 15 1. Physical Integrity, Liberty and Security, and Dignity of Human Rights Defenders ......................................................................................................................... 19 1.1 Protection from threats, attacks and other abuses ................................................................... 19 1.1.1 Impunity and effective remedies ....................................................................................... 20 1.1.2 Protection policies, programmes and mechanisms .......................................................... 27 1.2 Protection from judicial harassment, criminalization, arbitrary arrest and detention .............. 28 1.2.1 Criminalization or arbitrary and abusive application of legislation ............................... 30 1.2.2 Arbitrary detention and treatment in detention ................................................................ 37 1.2.3 Fair trial ........................................................................................................................... 43 1.3 Confronting stigmatization and marginalization ..................................................................... 49 1.3.1 Smear campaigns against human rights defenders .......................................................... 52 1.3.2 Women human rights defenders ....................................................................................... 54 1.3.3 LGBTI human rights defenders ........................................................................................ 56 1.3.4 Ethnic minority human rights defenders .......................................................................... 58 2. A Safe and Enabling Environment Conducive to Human Rights Work ............ 59 2.1 Freedom of opinion and expression and of information.......................................................... 60 2.1.1 Access to information of public interest and whistleblowers ........................................... 60 2.1.2 Freedom of the media ...................................................................................................... 63 2.2 Freedom of peaceful assembly ................................................................................................ 72 2.2.1 Regulatory restrictions on freedom of peaceful assembly ............................................... 72 2.2.2 Restrictions and penalties imposed on peaceful assemblies ............................................ 76 2.2.3 Challenges in the protection of public assemblies ........................................................... 81 2.3 Freedom of association and the right to form, join and participate effectively in NGOs ........ 85 2.3.1 Laws, administrative procedures and requirements governing the operation of NGOs .. 86 2.3.2 Access to funding and resources ...................................................................................... 90 2.4 Right to participate in public affairs ........................................................................................ 95 2.5 Freedom of movement and human rights work within and across boundaries ....................... 97 2.6 Right to private life................................................................................................................ 103 2.7 Right to access and communicate with international bodies ................................................. 105 3. Framework for Implementation of the Guidelines ............................................ 107 3.1 National implementation ....................................................................................................... 107 3.2 Protection of human rights defenders in other OSCE participating States and beyond the OSCE region ......................................................................................................................... 110 3.3 International co-operation and human rights mechanisms .................................................... 114 1 4. Annexes .................................................................................................................. 117 4.1 Statistics on submissions of questionnaires ........................................................................... 117 4.2 Statistics on interviews with human rights defenders ........................................................... 118 4.3 Questionnaires sent to OSCE participating States, NHRIs, human rights defenders, OSCE field operations ...................................................................................................................... 120 4.3.1 Questionnaire sent to OSCE participating States .......................................................... 120 4.3.2 Questionnaire sent to NHRIs ......................................................................................... 124 4.3.3 Questionnaire sent to human rights defenders ............................................................... 125 4.3.4 Questionnaire sent to OSCE field operations ................................................................ 126 2 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ACLU American Civil Liberties Union ADC Memorial Anti-Discrimination Centre “Memorial” BLM #BlackLivesMatter CEDAW Committee UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women CESCR UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights CoE Council of Europe ECHR European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ICCPR International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights ICESCR International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights GKNB Kyrgyz State Committee on National Security HCLU Hungarian Civil Liberties Union HCNM OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities HDIM OSCE Human Dimension Implementation Meeting HRAC Human Rights Advocacy Centre HRD Human rights defender ICNL International Center for Not-for-Profit Law LGBTI Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex MFA Ministry of Foreign Affairs MIA Ministry of Internal Affairs NGO Non-governmental organization NHRI National human rights institution NPM National Preventive Mechanism ODIHR OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights OGP Open Government Partnership OHCHR Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights OSCE Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe RFoM OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media SMMU OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine UN United Nations US United States 3 Executive Summary 1. In the foundational commitments of the Organization for Security and Co- operation in Europe (OSCE), participating States recognized the vital role of human rights defenders1 in the protection of human rights, which is a core objective of the OSCE.2 2. Targeted abuses and violations against human rights defenders strike at the heart of accountability and the right to effective remedies for victims of human rights violations, who are often from vulnerable groups. For this reason, OSCE participating States in 1994 emphasized “the need for the protection of human rights defenders”, in line with the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders.3 More than 20 years later, however, human rights defenders continue to face serious restrictions, threats, attacks and other abuses in all corners of the OSCE region. 3. In this report, the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) provides an overview and analysis of critical challenges faced by human rights defenders in the OSCE region, as well as good practices by OSCE participating States in their protection. The report also provides recommendations of how to close identified protection gaps, which should be considered in conjunction with the ODIHR Guidelines on the Protection of Human Rights Defenders (the Guidelines). 4 In and of themselves, the Guidelines are a comprehensive set of recommendations to States, reflecting international standards. This report assesses implementation of those standards by OSCE participating States in the two-year period following the June 2014 publication of the Guidelines. 1 The term “human rights defenders” is defined according to the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders, in which the UN General Assembly recognized the right of all people to act, “individually or in association with others, to promote and to strive for the protection and realization of human rights and fundamental freedoms”, through peaceful means and without discrimination. General Assembly Res. 53/144, “Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms”
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S
    Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S. Foreign Policy October 2020 Acknowledgments Human Rights First is a nonprofit, nonpartisan human rights advocacy and action organization based in Washington D.C., New York, and Los Angeles. © 2020 Human Rights First. All Rights Reserved. Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S. Foreign Policy was authored by Human Rights First’s staff and consultants. Senior Vice President for Policy Rob Berschinski served as lead author and editor-in-chief, assisted by Tolan Foreign Policy Legal Fellow Reece Pelley and intern Anna Van Niekerk. Contributing authors include: Eleanor Acer Scott Johnston Trevor Sutton Rob Berschinski David Mizner Raha Wala Cole Blum Reece Pelley Benjamin Haas Rita Siemion Significant assistance was provided by: Chris Anders Steven Feldstein Stephen Pomper Abigail Bellows Becky Gendelman Jennifer Quigley Brittany Benowitz Ryan Kaminski Scott Roehm Jim Bernfield Colleen Kelly Hina Shamsi Heather Brandon-Smith Kate Kizer Annie Shiel Christen Broecker Kennji Kizuka Mandy Smithberger Felice Gaer Dan Mahanty Sophia Swanson Bishop Garrison Kate Martin Yasmine Taeb Clark Gascoigne Jenny McAvoy Bailey Ulbricht Liza Goitein Sharon McBride Anna Van Niekerk Shannon Green Ian Moss Human Rights First challenges the United States of America to live up to its ideals. We believe American leadership is essential in the struggle for human dignity and the rule of law, and so we focus our advocacy on the U.S. government and other key actors able to leverage U.S. influence. When the U.S. government falters in its commitment to promote and protect human rights, we step in to demand reform, accountability, and justice.
    [Show full text]
  • March 12, 2021 Hon. Alejandro Mayorkas Hon. Antony Blinken Secretary Secretary Department of Homeland Security Department Of
    March 12, 2021 Hon. Alejandro Mayorkas Hon. Antony Blinken Secretary Secretary Department of Homeland Security Department of State 301 7th Street, SW 2201 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20528 Washington, DC 20520 CC: Esther Olavarria, Domestic Policy Council Roberta Jacobson, National Security Council Katie Tobin, National Security Council Re: Wind Down of the Migrant Protection Protocols Dear Secretaries Mayorkas and Blinken: Our faith-based, humanitarian, legal services, immigration, and human rights organizations and law school clinics welcome the administration’s initial steps to wind down the illegal and cruel Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP). We applaud the humane reception of the more than 1,400 asylum seekers brought to safety in the United States to date, the rapid processing of asylum seekers in the Matamoros tent encampment, and reported discussions to expand MPP processing to additional ports of entry. The recent designation of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuela is also a crucial and long overdue measure that will safeguard thousands of refugees from deportation. We write to recommend additional actions by the administration as the process to end MPP continues and to request further engagement and coordination to ensure people seeking refugee protection can find safety in the United States. We urge the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to immediately extend MPP processing to additional ports of entry and U.S. consulates, quickly expand processing to all individuals subjected to MPP, better coordinate with bi-national humanitarian and legal service providers assisting asylum seekers, provide necessary support for border communities welcoming asylum seekers, and address continued issues with the registration process.
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Nobel Committee, the Norwegian Nobel Institute NO-0255 Oslo, Norway
    Norwegian Nobel Committee, The Norwegian Nobel Institute NO-0255 Oslo, Norway 12 Sept 2018 Dear Members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, 9 December 2018 will mark the 20th anniversary of the UN’s Declaration on Human Rights Defenders (HRDs) 1. It is an ideal and opportune moment to recognise and celebrate the efforts of these extraordinary individuals who despite threats of violence and unlawful imprisonment, harassment, intimidation, torture and assassination, continue to peacefully challenge injustice and call for the implementation and strengthening of the rule of law. Since 1998, over 3000 human rights defenders have been killed for defending the fundamental values enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted by the UN. In recognising the increasingly hostile environments globally, in which human rights defenders must work, the late Former Secretary-General to the United Nations, Kofi Annan, recently said: “To stand up for human rights requires courage, perseverance, vigilance and a strong foundation of knowledge and evidence. We need to be vigilant in the protection of human rights defenders, for when the defenders’ rights are violated, all our rights are injured.” 2 In the same vein and emphasising the critical role that human rights defenders play in promoting and fostering stable democracies and sustainable peace, Permanent Representative of Norway to the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe, Ambassador Steffen Kongstad said: “Threats and attacks against human rights defenders may hamper the realisation of economic, social and cultural rights, undermining social cohesion, and ultimately stability and development.” 3 Despite this recognition and respect at the highest levels of the international community, human rights defenders are killed every day.
    [Show full text]
  • The Zimbabwean Human Rights Crisis: a Collaborative Approach to International Advocacy
    Davidson and Purohit: The Zimbabwean Human Rights Crisis: A Collaborative Approach to International Advocacy Note from the Field The Zimbabwean Human Rights Crisis: A Collaborative Approach to International Advocacy Lorna Davidson and Raj Purohitt Over the past several years, a serious human rights crisis has developed in Zimbabwe, where President Robert Mugabe employs repressive measures to cling to power. Civil society and human rights groups in Zimbabwe are among those who have come under attack by the government, and they face an extremely difficult challenge in bringing about positive change in the country. This article describes the development of the current crisis in Zimbabwe, focusing on the problems faced by local activists and organizations that seek to promote greater respect for human rights. It further discusses one recent initiative launched by the U.S.-based organization Human Rights First,which organized a consultative meeting of regional civil society groups in August 2003. The article addresses the role that can and should be played by internationalcivil society organizations, which must be sensitive to the contextual dynamics particularto the Zimbabwean crisis and to the region. If they are to be in any way effective, such organizations must act in supportof local actors and stronger regional networks. t Lorna Davidson is a Senior Associate in the Human Rights Defenders Program at Human Rights First in New York, N.Y, and Raj Purohit is the Legislative Director in the Washington, D.C. Office of Human Rights First. Human Rights First is the new name for the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights as of February 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 June 8, 2020 to Members of The
    June 8, 2020 To Members of the United Nations Human Rights Council Re: Request for the Convening of a Special Session on the Escalating Situation of Police Violence and Repression of Protests in the United States Excellencies, The undersigned family members of victims of police killings and civil society organizations from around the world, call on member states of the UN Human Rights Council to urgently convene a Special Session on the situation of human rights in the United States in order to respond to the unfolding grave human rights crisis borne out of the repression of nationwide protests. The recent protests erupted on May 26 in response to the police murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis, Minnesota, which was only one of a recent string of unlawful killings of unarmed Black people by police and armed white vigilantes. We are deeply concerned about the escalation in violent police responses to largely peaceful protests in the United States, which included the use of rubber bullets, tear gas, pepper spray and in some cases live ammunition, in violation of international standards on the use of force and management of assemblies including recent U.N. Guidance on Less Lethal Weapons. Additionally, we are greatly concerned that rather than using his position to serve as a force for calm and unity, President Trump has chosen to weaponize the tensions through his rhetoric, evidenced by his promise to seize authority from Governors who fail to take the most extreme tactics against protestors and to deploy federal armed forces against protestors (an action which would be of questionable legality).
    [Show full text]
  • Holding Corporations to Account for Land and Human Rights Violations
    Making a Killing Holding corporations to account for land and human rights violations Making a Killing: Holding corporations to account for land and human rights violations is published by Trócaire as part of its programme of Policy, Research and Advocacy Acknowledgements: A sincere thank you to all Trócaire partners and human rights defenders who shared their experiences, insights and analysis for this report. Trócaire would like to thank the external and internal reviewers for their valuable inputs on the paper. FRONT COVER: Women from San Pedro Ayampuc & San Jose del Golfo, La Puya, resisting the El Tambor gold mine. Photo: Daniele Volpe. Making a Killing: Holding corporations to account for land and human rights violations | 1 CONTENTS PAGE Foreword 03 Executive Summary 04 Chapters 1. Why a focus on corporate accountability? 07 2. Communities at the frontline 13 3. Corporations: the accountability challenge 29 4. The way forward: legislative and policy opportunities 35 5. Recommendations: action on accountability 45 2 | Making a Killing: Holding corporations to account for land and human rights violations LIST OF ACRONYMS CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women CESCR UN Committee on Economic and Social and Cultural Rights CETIM Europe-Third World Centre CFS Committee on World Food Security CIDSE Coopération Internationals Pour le Développement et la Solidarité CRC UN Committee on the Rights of the Child CSW Commission on the Status of Women ENNHRI European Network of National Human Rights Institutions
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Sanctions Overview Primer
    FACT SHEET: NOVEMBER 2020 Targeted Human Rights and Anti-Corruption Sanctions – A General Overview Part 1 in HRF’s Guide to US Targeted Sanctions for Combatting Human Rights Abuses and Corruption law in US history. In December 2017, the Introduction to US Targeted Sanctions USG issued EO 13818, which • The United States government (USG) simultaneously implemented the GMA and maintains several targeted sanctions expanded its scope, creating the Global programs to create accountability for human Magnitsky sanctions program. rights abusers and corrupt officials across o EO 13818 gives discretionary authority to the globe. Among the most widely used are the Secretaries of Treasury and State to Global Magnitsky sanctions (for more block or revoke US visas and to block information, see Part 2 of this series), 7031(c) (freeze) all US-based property and visa sanctions (for more information, see Part 3 interests in property of foreign persons of this series), and country-specific programs (both individuals and entities) who have with relevant human rights and anti-corruption engaged in: prongs (for more information, see Parts 4-20 of a) “serious human rights abuse” (SHRA) this series). b) “acts of corruption,” including the • Purpose of targeted sanctions: Targeted transfer or the facilitation of the transfer sanctions aim to encourage behavior of the proceeds of corruption. modification, limit the impunity of perpetrators, o The USG is required by law to involve deter covered crimes, and achieve diplomatic NGOs in Global Magnitsky sanctions goals
    [Show full text]
  • October 23, 2020 Submitted Via
    October 23, 2020 Submitted via www.regulations.gov Lauren Alder Reid, Assistant Director Office of Policy Executive Office for Immigration Review 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2616 Falls Church, VA 22041 RE: RIN 1125–AA93; EOIR Docket No. 19–0010; A.G. Order No. 4843–2020, Public Comment Opposing Proposed Rules on Procedures for Asylum and Withholding of Removal Human Rights First submits this comment urging the Department of Justice (DOJ) to withdraw these proposed rules in their entirety. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) would further eviscerate procedural protections for asylum seekers1 in removal proceedings, making it more difficult for refugees to find safety in the United States. The proposed rule would create a 15-day filing deadline for asylum applications for those in asylum-only proceedings, making it virtually impossible for many refugees to obtain counsel or fully develop their asylum claims. The proposed rule would require immigration judges to adjudicate most asylum applications within 180 days of filing with very limited exceptions for continuances, which could block asylum seekers from finding counsel or fully preparing their cases. Further, the rule would require immigration judges to reject asylum applications for even minor errors in completing the application form or for failing to pay an unprecedented $50 asylum fee with no exceptions for detained or indigent persons. Many asylum seekers arrive in the United States with limited financial resources. Finally, the proposed rule would allow immigration judges to submit evidence in asylum proceedings – further undermining their role in fairly developing the record and serving as neutral decision makers – and it instructs judges to consider U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A/HRC/21/2 Advance Unedited Version
    A/HRC/21/2 Advance unedited version Distr.: 26 August 2013 Original: English Human Rights Council Twenty-first session Agenda item 1 Organizational and procedural matters Report of the Human Rights Council on its twenty-first session Vice-President and Rapporteur : Ms. Gulnara Iskakova (Kyrgyzstan) GE. A/HRC/21/2 Contents Chapter Paragraphs Page Part One: Resolutions and decisions ................................................................................................................ 6 I. Resolutions ....................................................................................................................................... 6 21/1. Situation of human rights in Eritrea .................................................................................. 6 21/2. The human right to safe drinking water and sanitation ..................................................... 7 21/3. Promoting human rights and fundamental freedoms through a better understanding of traditional values of humankind: best practices ............................................................ 11 21/4. Enforced or involuntary disappearances ........................................................................... 13 21/5. Contribution of the United Nations system as a whole to the advancement of the business and human rights agenda and the dissemination and implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights .......................................................... 17 21/6. Preventable maternal mortality and morbidity and human rights
    [Show full text]
  • AUS 2/2018 15 February 2018
    PALAIS DES NATIONS • 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND Mandates of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression; the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders; and the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism REFERENCE: OL AUS 2/2018 15 February 2018 Excellency, We have the honour to address you in our capacities as Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression; Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders; and Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, pursuant to Human Rights Council resolutions 34/18, 34/5 and 31/3. In this connection, we would like to submit the following comments on the National Security Legislation Amendment (Espionage and Foreign Interference) Bill 2017 (“the Bill”), in response to the call for submissions by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security. Introduction The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, David Kaye, the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights while countering terrorism, Fionnuala D. Ní Aoláin, and the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, Michel Forst, submit these comments in response to the Committee’s call for submissions regarding the National Security Legislation Amendment (Espionage and Foreign Interference) Bill 2017 (“the Bill”). Special Rapporteurs are independent human rights experts with mandates from the Human Rights Council to report and advise United Nations member States on human rights issues from a thematic or country-specific perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nnual Report
    Annual Report 2013 Content The Norwegian Helsinki Committee Established in 1977 2 The Norwegian Helsinki Committee 3 Perspectives The Norwegian Helsinki Committee (NHC) is a non-governmental organisation that works to 4 The NHC Secretariat promote respect for human rights, nationally and internationally. Its work is based on the conviction that documentation and active promotion of human rights by civil society is 5 Organisation needed for states to secure human rights, at home and in other countries. 6 Activities in 2013 7 The Russian Federation NHC bases its work on international human rights instruments adopted by the United 11 Belarus Nations, the Council of Europe, the Organisation of Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), including the 1975 Helsinki Final Act. 13 Ukraine 15 South Caucasus The main areas of focus for the NHC are the countries of Europe, North America and 20 Central Asia Central Asia. The NHC works irrespective of ideology or political system in these countries and maintains political neutrality. 23 Western Balkans 27 Turkey 28 Hungary How we work 29 Natalya Estemirova Documentation Centre Human rights monitoring and reporting 30 Human rights in Norway Through monitoring and reporting on problematic human rights situations in specific countries, the NHC sheds light on violations of human rights. The NHC places particular 35 Co-operation and international processes emphasis on civil and political rights, including the fundamental freedoms of expression, 37 EEA Grants belief, association and assembly. On-site research and close co-operation with key civil 38 Information society actors are our main working methods. The NHC has expertise in election observation 38 Finances and has sent numerous observer missions to elections over the last two decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontlinedefenders.Org/Multipleexposure
    [[ DDIISSPPAATTCCHHEESS ]] REPORTS FROM THE FRONT LINE TRUSTEES Denis O’Brien (Chairman) is Chairman of Arnold Tsunga is Africa Director of the In - What does Front the Digicel Group. He is ternational Commission of one of Ireland’s leading en - Jurists. He was Executive trepreneurs with extensive Secretary of the Law Line Defenders do? investments across several Society of Zimbabwe and sectors. Mr. O’Brien was Executive Director of Front Line, the International Foundation for the voted Ireland’s Entrepre - Zimbabwe Lawyers for Protection of Human Rights Defenders, is an neur of the Year in 1998 in the inaugural Human Rights. He was a joint winner of the international non-governmental organisation (NGO) running of the worldwide competition Martin Ennals Award for Human Rights Defenders in 2006. established by charitable deed trust. It was organised and sponsored by Ernst & Young. Mr. O’Brien is also a director of a founded in Dublin in 2001 with the specific aim of number of private companies which hold protecting human rights defenders at risk, people some of his other business interests ADVISORY COUNCIL who work, non-violently, for any or all of the rights including Quinta do Lago SA, Topaz Energy Michel Forst is the United Nations Special enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Group Limited and Communicorp Group Limited. In 2000 he established The Iris Rapporteur on the situation Rights (UDHR). Front Line Defenders addresses the O’Brien Foundation to assist disadvantaged of human rights defenders protection needs identified by defenders communities in Ireland and internationally. and Secretary General of themselves. He is co-founder of Front Line Defenders.
    [Show full text]