DOCSLIB.ORG

Feed the Future Mali Livestock Technology Scaling Program (FTF-MLTSP): Annual Report, October 2016–September 2017 I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Feed the Future Mali Livestock Technology Scaling Program (FTF-MLTSP): Annual Report, October 2016–September 2017 I Feed the Future Mali Livestock Technology Scaling Program (FTF-MLTSP): Annual report, October 2016–September 2017 i Feed the Future Mali Livestock technology scaling program Annual Report, October 2016–September 2017 Feed the Future Mali Livestock Technology Scaling Program (FTF-MLTSP): Annual report, October 2016–September 2017 i Feed the Future Mali Livestock technology scaling program Annual report, October 2016–September 2017 December 2017 ii Feed the Future Mali Livestock Technology Scaling Program (FTF-MLTSP): Annual report, October 2016–September 2017 © 2017 International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) ILRI thanks all donors and organizations which globally support its work through their contributions to the CGIAR system This publication is copyrighted by the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). It is licensed for use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. To view this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0. Unless otherwise noted, you are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format), adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the following conditions: ATTRIBUTION. The work must be attributed, but not in any way that suggests endorsement by ILRI or the author(s). NOTICE: For any reuse or distribution, the licence terms of this work must be made clear to others. Any of the above conditions can be waived if permission is obtained from the copyright holder. Nothing in this licence impairs or restricts the author’s moral rights. Fair dealing and other rights are in no way affected by the above. The parts used must not misrepresent the meaning of the publication. ILRI would appreciate being sent a copy of any materials in which text, photos etc. have been used. Editing, design and layout—ILRI Editorial and Publishing Services, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Cover photo— ILRI/Stevie Mann Citation: Feed the Future Mali Livestock Technology Scaling Program. 2017. Feed the Future Mali Livestock Technology Scaling Program (FTF-MLTSP): Annual Report,October 2016–September 2017. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Patron: Professor Peter C Doherty AC, FAA, FRS Animal scientist, Nobel Prize Laureate for Physiology or Medicine–1996 Box 30709, Nairobi 00100 Kenya ilri.org Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Phone +254 20 422 3000 better lives through livestock Phone +251 11 617 2000 Fax +254 20 422 3001 Fax +251 11 667 6923 Email [email protected] ILRI is a CGIAR research centre Email [email protected] ILRI has offices in East Africa • South Asia • Southeast and East Asia • Southern Africa • West Africa Feed the Future Mali Livestock Technology Scaling Program (FTF-MLTSP): Annual report, October 2016–September 2017 iii The Feed the Future Mali Livestock Technology Scaling (FTF-MLTS) program seeks to contribute to the inclusive growth of the ruminant livestock value chain for increased income, food and nutrition security for 266,000 cattle, sheep, and goat keepers and other value chains actors in three regions in the country (Mopti, Timbuktu and Sikasso), hence lifting them out of poverty. Supported by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) as part of the US government’s Feed the Future initiative, the program sets out to bridge ruminant livestock productivity gaps and to enhance the volume and value of ruminant livestock marketed through a wide-scale dissemination of proven livestock technologies and best practices. The program is implemented by the International Livestock Research Insitute (ILRI) working with a consortium of public institutions (Direction Nationale des Services Veterinaires, Direction Nationale des Productions et Industries Animales; Laboratoire Centrale Veterinaire, Instituit d’Economie Rurale), private sector organizations (private veterinarians, feed manufacturers) and non-governmental organizations such as the Catholic Relief Services (CRS), the SNV Netherlands Development Organisation, the Association Malienne d’Eveil et de Développement Durable (AMEDD), and the Agronomes et Vétérinaires sans Frontières (AVSF). FTF MLTSP also collaborates with ongoing FTF projects such as Livestock for Growth and other rural development programs in Mali that are pursuing similar objectives in order to create synergies among them. This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the Feed the Future initiative. The contents are the responsibility of the International Livestock Research Institute and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. iv Feed the Future Mali Livestock Technology Scaling Program (FTF-MLTSP): Annual report, October 2016–September 2017 Contents Tables v Acronyms and abbreviations 1 Executive summary 2 Background 4 Progress during the reporting period 5 Program management, monitoring and evaluation 5 Objective 1. Promote innovative animal health delivery systems and best health interventions to reduce disease burden in ruminant livestock 6 Objective 2. Increasing availability of quality feed biomass, improve feed utilization and husbandry practices and promote feed and fodder value chains 10 Objective 3. To leverage USAID-led livestock market development and policy initiatives in support to the up scaling of ruminant livestock productivity enhancing technologies 16 Gender related achievements and how gender is mainstreamed into the activities 23 Synergic activities achieved with other partners (US and non-US including the government of Mali, other donors and local NGOs) 24 Indicator data table with target and actual results for the reporting period 26 Problems/challenges (technical, management, and financial) during the reporting period and anticipated solutions 28 Management, financial and logistical challenges 28 Technical challenges 28 Success stories 29 Feed the Future Mali Livestock Technology Scaling Program (FTF-MLTSP): Annual report, October 2016–September 2017 v Tables Table 1. List of implementing partners and their geographical focus 4 Table 2. Number of animals vaccinated for targeted diseases in 31 target communes 8 Table 3. Targeted and actual numbers of animals vaccinated in 31 target communes 8 Table 4. Projections of number of farmers and surface area under fodder crops in Sio, Fakala and Socoura 11 Table 5. Quantity of seeds distributed in Sio, Socoura and Fakala (Mopti) communes 11 Table 6. Bourgou production by farmers in Timbuktu target communes (2016-2017) 13 Table 7. Participants to the training on integrated technology packages 13 Table 8. Distribution of trainees trained by training site 15 Table 9. Indicators with target, actual results and comments 26 Feed the Future Mali Livestock Technology Scaling Program (FTF-MLTSP): Annual report, October 2016–September 2017 1 Acronyms and abbreviations AMEDD Association Malienne d’Eveil et de Développement Durable AVSF Agronomes et Vétérinaires sans Frontières AU-PANVAC African Union–Pan African Vaccine Centre CAHP Community animal health platform CBPP Contagious bovine pleuropneumonia CNASA Centre National d’Appui à la Santé Animale COVEM Collectif des Vétérinaires Mandataires CRS Catholic Relief Service DNPIA Direction Nationale des Productions et Industries Animales DNSV Direction des Services Veterinaires FEBEVIM Fédération nationale des groupements interprofessionnel de la filière viande et lait au Mali FTF Feed the Future ICRISAT International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics IER Institut d’Economie Rurale ILRI International Livestock Research Institute IP Innovation platform L4G Livestock for growth LCV Laboratoire Central Veterinaire LMIS Livestock market information system M&E Monitoring and evaluation MLTSP Mali livestock technology scaling program NGO Non-governmental organization PPR Peste des petits ruminants SNV Netherlands Development Organization USAID United States Agency for International Development XOF West African CFA franc 2 Feed the Future Mali Livestock Technology Scaling Program (FTF-MLTSP): Annual report, October 2016–September 2017 Executive summary Feed the Future Mali Livestock technology scaling program (FTF-MLTSP) is aligned to the USAID/Mali FTF program and more specifically to the Mali FTF livestock value chain component set out to boost growth in the Mali livestock sector. The overarching goal of FTF-MLTSP is to contribute to inclusive growth in ruminant livestock value chains for increased income, food and nutrition security for 266,000 cattle, sheep and goat keepers and other value chains actors in the Mopti, Timbuktu and Sikasso regions, hence lifting them out of poverty. FTF-MLTSP is set out to bridge ruminant livestock productivity gaps and to improve access to more remunerative markets through a large- scale dissemination of proven livestock technologies and best practices in the target regions. This reports highlights progress in the FTF-MLTSP implementation, achievements, and challenges encountered during October 2016 to September 2017 period. Program management During the fiscal year, staffing of the project coordination team was completed and the foundation for strong partnership with a number on implementing partners was laid out. Eight sub-awards were granted to various public and private implementing partners (Table 1) with extension, development or research mandates. By September 2017, the amendments of eight of the sub-awards were signed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Central & Northern Mali Emergency Response
    CENTRAL & NORTHERN MALI EMERGENCY RESPONSE SITUATION REPORT | SEPTEMBER, 2019 Mali Response To Remain Category III June 2019 to 168,515, by 8 August, the majority of them National Office Response from Mopti and Segou regions. UN Hosts High-Level Meeting on Mali and • A total of 81,338 people are at risk of flooding, with78,115 the Sahel Highlights A World Vision Declaration Decision Group (DDG), that already affected. Stronger precipitations are expected, while On September 25th 2019, the United Nations hosted a high-lev- discusses the magnitude of each humanitarian emergency, the level of Niger river may rise as waters are released from making decisions on categorization, has reviewed the Cen- el meeting on Mali and the Sahel at the United Nations General dams in Guinea and Mali. Assembly. The meeting was opened by the Secretary-General tral and Northern Mali Emergency Response (CNMER). Its • Reports reveal that 920 schools remained closed at the end resolution, the Central and Northern Mali Emergency of the United Nations, Mr. António Guterres, together with the of the school year. Of these, 598 were in the Mopti region, President of the Republic of Mali, H.E. Mr. Ibrahim Boubacar Response remains a Category Three National Office affecting 276,000 children. Response. Keïta, among other Heads of State and dignitaries. • A total of 650,000 people are expected to be at risk of severe Participants discussed the implementation of the Agreement for This is because of the magnitude of the crisis that has over food insecurity and livelihood compared to 416,000 initially, Peace and Reconciliation in Mali, originating from the Algiers 3.9 million people affected by the emergency.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Diversification in Mali: the Case of the Cotton Zone of Koutiala
    AGRICULTURAL DIVERSIFICATION IN MALI: THE CASE OF THE COTTON ZONE OF KOUTIALA By Mariam Sako Thiam A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics – Master of Science 2014 ABSTRACT AGRICULTURAL DIVERSIFICATION IN MALI: THE CASE OF THE COTTON ZONE OF KOUTIALA By Mariam Sako Thiam Cotton production plays a central role in the economy and the livelihood of cotton growers in the Koutiala area of Mali. Despite all the investment made in the cotton zones, the cotton farmers in Koutiala suffer substantially from uncertainties in the cotton subsector linked to prices, timely payment, and to the future structure of the industry. This study analyzes empirically how cotton growers with different agricultural characteristics coped with these uncertainties over the period 2006-2010. The data used in this study were collected during the survey that covered 150 households in the Koutiala area during three cropping seasons: 2006-07, 2008-09 and 2009- 10.The results show that despite income diversification among the households surveyed in Koutiala, agricultural production remains the main source of income. The findings also show that the farmers who continued to grow cotton during the three years of the survey and those who started producing cotton after year one diversified within the agricultural sector by producing more peanuts and cowpeas while the farmers who dropped out of cotton production after year one of the survey diversified toward non-farm activities such as commerce and self. We also found that the non-cotton growers are the poorest group of farmers, with less agricultural equipment and labor as well as less overall wealth, limiting their potential to invest in farm activities and start an off-farm business.
    [Show full text]
  • Apiculture Au Sud Mali
    TG01 / 2008 Transfert et de la gestion décentralisée Rapport d’étude : Problématique de l’immatriculation, du trans- fert et de la gestion dé- centralisée des équipe- ments et infrastructures productives Intercooperation Jèkasy –www.dicsahel.org Maître Oumar Cissé Maître Tignougou Sanogo Jèkasy Sikasso J Problématique de l’immatriculation, du transfert et de la gestion décentralisée des équipements et infrastructures productives Rapport d’étude Maître Oumar Cissé Maître Tignougou Sanogo Avril 2008 2 TABLE DES MATIERES I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................... 6 II. ANALYSE CRITIQUE DU CADRE SOCIO-JURIDIQUE .......................................................................7 2.1 CONTEXTE................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 POUVOIRS DE L’ETAT SUR LES INFRASTRUCTURES .................................................................................. 7 2.3 PREROGATIVES DES COLLECTIVITES TERRITORIALES SUR LES INFRASTRUCTURES....................................8 2.3.1 Appropriation communale des équipements ....................................................................................... 9 2.3.2 Gestion communale des équipements................................................................................................ 10 2.3 LES PRETENTIONS DES POPULATIONS SUR LES INFRASTRUCTURES.........................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin Sap N°377
    PRESIDENCE DE LA REPUBLIQUE REPUBLIQUE DU MALI ------------***------------ ------------***------------ COMMISSARIAT A LA SECURITE ALIMENTAIRE Un Peuple-Un But-Une Foi ------------***------------ SYSTEME D’ALERTE PRECOCE (S.A.P) BP. 2660, Bamako-Mali Tel :(223) 20 80 10 28 ; Adresse email : [email protected] /[email protected] Adresse Site Web : www.sapmali.com BULLETIN SAP N°377 Mars 2019 Présentation du Système d’Alerte Précoce (S.A.P) du MALI PRESENTATION DU SAP Le SAP est un système de collecte permanente d’informations sur la situation alimentaire. Sa mission consiste essentiellement à fournir à l’ensemble du système de sécurité alimentaire du pays les informations nécessaires à une affectation optimale du stock national de sécurité dans le cadre d'opérations d'aides alimentaires ciblées ou à une utilisation efficiente des fonds de sécurité alimentaire dans des actions d’atténuation d’insécurité alimentaire. Son objectif est de déterminer suffisamment à l'avance les populations les plus vulnérables risquant de connaître des difficultés alimentaires et/ou nutritionnelles, de dire les raisons du risque, de dire à partir de quand, pour combien de temps, avec quelle intensité et quelles sont les actions d’atténuation possibles. Les informations sont recueillies auprès des services administratifs, techniques, de la société civile et des élus locaux depuis les communes vers les chefs-lieux de cercles, les chefs-lieux de Régions et enfin Bamako. Au niveau de chaque chef-lieu de Région, l'équipe régionale SAP chargée du recueil des informations est appuyée par la Direction Régionale de la Planification, de la Statistique, de l’Informatique, de l’Aménagement du Territoire et de la Population.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL REPORT Quantitative Instrument to Measure Commune
    FINAL REPORT Quantitative Instrument to Measure Commune Effectiveness Prepared for United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Mali Mission, Democracy and Governance (DG) Team Prepared by Dr. Lynette Wood, Team Leader Leslie Fox, Senior Democracy and Governance Specialist ARD, Inc. 159 Bank Street, Third Floor Burlington, VT 05401 USA Telephone: (802) 658-3890 FAX: (802) 658-4247 in cooperation with Bakary Doumbia, Survey and Data Management Specialist InfoStat, Bamako, Mali under the USAID Broadening Access and Strengthening Input Market Systems (BASIS) indefinite quantity contract November 2000 Table of Contents ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS.......................................................................... i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................... ii 1 INDICATORS OF AN EFFECTIVE COMMUNE............................................... 1 1.1 THE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE..............................................1 1.2 THE EFFECTIVE COMMUNE: A DEVELOPMENT HYPOTHESIS..........................................2 1.2.1 The Development Problem: The Sound of One Hand Clapping ............................ 3 1.3 THE STRATEGIC GOAL – THE COMMUNE AS AN EFFECTIVE ARENA OF DEMOCRATIC LOCAL GOVERNANCE ............................................................................4 1.3.1 The Logic Underlying the Strategic Goal........................................................... 4 1.3.2 Illustrative Indicators: Measuring Performance at the
    [Show full text]
  • VEGETALE : Semences De Riz
    MINISTERE DE L’AGRICULTURE REPUBLIQUE DU MALI ********* UN PEUPLE- UN BUT- UNE FOI DIRECTION NATIONALE DE L’AGRICULTURE APRAO/MALI DNA BULLETIN N°1 D’INFORMATION SUR LES SEMENCES D’ORIGINE VEGETALE : Semences de riz JANVIER 2012 1 LISTE DES ABREVIATIONS ACF : Action Contre la Faim APRAO : Amélioration de la Production de Riz en Afrique de l’Ouest CAPROSET : Centre Agro écologique de Production de Semences Tropicales CMDT : Compagnie Malienne de Développement de textile CRRA : Centre Régional de Recherche Agronomique DNA : Direction Nationale de l’Agriculture DRA : Direction Régionale de l’Agriculture ICRISAT: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics IER : Institut d’Economie Rurale IRD : International Recherche Développement MPDL : Mouvement pour le Développement Local ON : Office du Niger ONG : Organisation Non Gouvernementale OP : Organisation Paysanne PAFISEM : Projet d’Appui à la Filière Semencière du Mali PDRN : Projet de Diffusion du Riz Nérica RHK : Réseau des Horticulteurs de Kayes SSN : Service Semencier National WASA: West African Seeds Alliancy 2 INTRODUCTION Le Mali est un pays à vocation essentiellement agro pastorale. Depuis un certain temps, le Gouvernement a opté de faire du Mali une puissance agricole et faire de l’agriculture le moteur de la croissance économique. La réalisation de cette ambition passe par la combinaison de plusieurs facteurs dont la production et l’utilisation des semences certifiées. On note que la semence contribue à hauteur de 30-40% dans l’augmentation de la production agricole. En effet, les semences G4, R1 et R2 sont produites aussi bien par les structures techniques de l’Etat (Service Semencier National et l’IER) que par les sociétés et Coopératives semencières (FASO KABA, Cigogne, Comptoir 2000, etc.) ainsi que par les producteurs individuels à travers le pays.
    [Show full text]
  • M700kv1905mlia1l-Mliadm22305
    ! ! ! ! ! RÉGION DE MOPTI - MALI ! Map No: MLIADM22305 ! ! 5°0'W 4°0'W ! ! 3°0'W 2°0'W 1°0'W Kondi ! 7 Kirchamba L a c F a t i Diré ! ! Tienkour M O P T I ! Lac Oro Haib Tonka ! ! Tombouctou Tindirma ! ! Saréyamou ! ! Daka T O M B O U C T O U Adiora Sonima L ! M A U R I T A N I E ! a Salakoira Kidal c Banikane N N ' T ' 0 a Kidal 0 ° g P ° 6 6 a 1 1 d j i ! Tombouctou 7 P Mony Gao Gao Niafunké ! P ! ! Gologo ! Boli ! Soumpi Koulikouro ! Bambara-Maoude Kayes ! Saraferé P Gossi ! ! ! ! Kayes Diou Ségou ! Koumaïra Bouramagan Kel Zangoye P d a Koulikoro Segou Ta n P c ! Dianka-Daga a ! Rouna ^ ! L ! Dianké Douguel ! Bamako ! ougoundo Leré ! Lac A ! Biro Sikasso Kormou ! Goue ! Sikasso P ! N'Gorkou N'Gouma ! ! ! Horewendou Bia !Sah ! Inadiatafane Koundjoum Simassi ! ! Zoumoultane-N'Gouma ! ! Baraou Kel Tadack M'Bentie ! Kora ! Tiel-Baro ! N'Daba ! ! Ambiri-Habe Bouta ! ! Djo!ndo ! Aoure Faou D O U E N T Z A ! ! ! ! Hanguirde ! Gathi-Loumo ! Oualo Kersani ! Tambeni ! Deri Yogoro ! Handane ! Modioko Dari ! Herao ! Korientzé ! Kanfa Beria G A O Fraction Sormon Youwarou ! Ourou! hama ! ! ! ! ! Guidio-Saré Tiecourare ! Tondibango Kadigui ! Bore-Maures ! Tanal ! Diona Boumbanke Y O U W A R O U ! ! ! ! Kiri Bilanto ! ! Nampala ! Banguita ! bo Sendegué Degue -Dé Hombori Seydou Daka ! o Gamni! d ! la Fraction Sanango a Kikara Na! ki ! ! Ga!na W ! ! Kelma c Go!ui a Te!ye Kadi!oure L ! Kerengo Diambara-Mouda ! Gorol-N! okara Bangou ! ! ! Dogo Gnimignama Sare Kouye ! Gafiti ! ! ! Boré Bossosso ! Ouro-Mamou ! Koby Tioguel ! Kobou Kamarama Da!llah Pringa!
    [Show full text]
  • R E GION S C E R C L E COMMUNES No. Total De La Population En 2015
    PLANIFICATION DES DISTRIBUTIONS PENDANT LA PERIODE DE SOUDURE - Mise à jour au 26/05/2015 - % du CH No. total de la Nb de Nb de Nb de Phases 3 à 5 Cibles CH COMMUNES population en bénéficiaires TONNAGE CSA bénéficiaires Tonnages PAM bénéficiaires Tonnages CICR MODALITES (Avril-Aout (Phases 3 à 5) 2015 (SAP) du CSA du PAM du CICR CERCLE REGIONS 2015) TOMBOUCTOU 67 032 12% 8 044 8 044 217 10 055 699,8 CSA + PAM ALAFIA 15 844 12% 1 901 1 901 51 CSA BER 23 273 12% 2 793 2 793 76 6 982 387,5 CSA + CICR BOUREM-INALY 14 239 12% 1 709 1 709 46 2 438 169,7 CSA + PAM LAFIA 9 514 12% 1 142 1 142 31 1 427 99,3 CSA + PAM SALAM 26 335 12% 3 160 3 160 85 CSA TOMBOUCTOU TOMBOUCTOU TOTAL 156 237 18 748 18 749 506 13 920 969 6 982 388 DIRE 24 954 10% 2 495 2 495 67 CSA ARHAM 3 459 10% 346 346 9 1 660 92,1 CSA + CICR BINGA 6 276 10% 628 628 17 2 699 149,8 CSA + CICR BOUREM SIDI AMAR 10 497 10% 1 050 1 050 28 CSA DANGHA 15 835 10% 1 584 1 584 43 CSA GARBAKOIRA 6 934 10% 693 693 19 CSA HAIBONGO 17 494 10% 1 749 1 749 47 CSA DIRE KIRCHAMBA 5 055 10% 506 506 14 CSA KONDI 3 744 10% 374 374 10 CSA SAREYAMOU 20 794 10% 2 079 2 079 56 9 149 507,8 CSA + CICR TIENKOUR 8 009 10% 801 801 22 CSA TINDIRMA 7 948 10% 795 795 21 2 782 154,4 CSA + CICR TINGUEREGUIF 3 560 10% 356 356 10 CSA DIRE TOTAL 134 559 13 456 13 456 363 0 0 16 290 904 GOUNDAM 15 444 15% 2 317 9 002 243 3 907 271,9 CSA + PAM ALZOUNOUB 5 493 15% 824 3 202 87 CSA BINTAGOUNGOU 10 200 15% 1 530 5 946 161 4 080 226,4 CSA + CICR ADARMALANE 1 172 15% 176 683 18 469 26,0 CSA + CICR DOUEKIRE 22 203 15% 3 330
    [Show full text]
  • Multidimensional Household Vulnerability Assessment in Semi-Arid Areas of Mali
    Multidimensional household vulnerability assessment in semi-arid areas of Mali Alcade C. Segnon (IESS-UG/ICRISAT/FSA-UAC) Edmond Totin (UNAB) Robert B. Zougmore (ICRISAT) Enoch G. AchigAn-Dako (FSA-UAC) BenjAmin D. OFori (IESS-UG) Chris Gordon (IESS-UG) Background Semi-arid areas (SARs) of West Africa: hotspots of climate change v Substantial multi-decadal variability (both in time and space) with prolonged dry periods (e.g., 1980s) v Seasonal variability in rainfall patterns v Strong ecological, economic and social impacts, making socio-ecological systems particularly vulnerable Continued & stronger trends in the future Background Climate risks: only one layer of Vulnerability in SARs v Biophysical, socioeconomic, institutional and political, at different scales to shape vulnerability in SARs v Little attention to multiple & interacting nature of driving forces climate VA v Crucial if adaptation is to be effective and sustained v “Insights from multiple-scale, interdisciplinary work to improve the understanding of the barriers, enablers and limits to effective, sustained and widespread adaptation” v To develop a unique and systemic understanding of the processes and factors that impede adaptation and cause vulnerability to persist. Study aims to assess household vulnerability to climatic and non- climatic risks in SARs of Mali Methodological approach IPCC AR4 conceptualization of vulnerability Vulnerability = function of exposure, sensitivity & adaptive capacity Multidimensional LV approach (Gerlitz et al 2017) v Livelihood Vulnerability Index (LVI) (Hahn et al 2009) modified and expanded to include non-climatic shocks v Framed within AR4 framing of vulnerability v 10 components and 3 dimensions v Identification of indicators and vulnerabilities across dimensions through PRA Vulnerability typology approach (Sietz et al 2011, 2017) v Standardization/Normalization of indicators v FAMD analysis: a PCA-type, but accommodate simultaneously quanti.
    [Show full text]
  • Save the Children in Partnership with SNV Projet USAID Nutrition Et
    Save the Children in partnership with SNV Projet USAID Nutrition et Hygiène à Sikasso Cooperative Agreement No. AID-688-A-13-00004 Quarterly Report October 1, 2015-December 31, 2015 Contact Information for this report: Maurice Gerald Zafimanjaka, MSc, MPH Project Director, Projet USAID Nutrition et Hygiène Email: [email protected] 1 Contents Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 Introduction: ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Context and Project Objectives: ........................................................................................................................ 4 Planned activities for the reporting period (Y3Q1): ......................................................................................... 4 Achievements during Y3 Q1: ............................................................................................................................. 6 Success Stories ................................................................................................................................................. 26 Challenges and Constraints ............................................................................................................................. 28 Lessons Learned ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annuaire Statistique 2015 Du Secteur Développement Rural
    MINISTERE DE L’AGRICULTURE REPUBLIQUE DU MALI ----------------- Un Peuple - Un But – Une Foi SECRETARIAT GENERAL ----------------- ----------------- CELLULE DE PLANIFICATION ET DE STATISTIQUE / SECTEUR DEVELOPPEMENT RURAL Annuaire Statistique 2015 du Secteur Développement Rural Juin 2016 1 LISTE DES TABLEAUX Tableau 1 : Répartition de la population par région selon le genre en 2015 ............................................................ 10 Tableau 2 : Population agricole par région selon le genre en 2015 ........................................................................ 10 Tableau 3 : Répartition de la Population agricole selon la situation de résidence par région en 2015 .............. 10 Tableau 4 : Répartition de la population agricole par tranche d'âge et par sexe en 2015 ................................. 11 Tableau 5 : Répartition de la population agricole par tranche d'âge et par Région en 2015 ...................................... 11 Tableau 6 : Population agricole par tranche d'âge et selon la situation de résidence en 2015 ............. 12 Tableau 7 : Pluviométrie décadaire enregistrée par station et par mois en 2015 ..................................................... 15 Tableau 8 : Pluviométrie décadaire enregistrée par station et par mois en 2015 (suite) ................................... 16 Tableau 9 : Pluviométrie enregistrée par mois 2015 ........................................................................................ 17 Tableau 10 : Pluviométrie enregistrée par station en 2015 et sa comparaison à
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptions and Adaptations to Climate Change in Southern Mali
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 12 March 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202103.0353.v1 Perceptions and adaptations to climate change in Southern Mali Tiémoko SOUMAORO PhD student at the UFR of Economics and Management, Gaston Berger University (UGB) of Saint-Louis, Senegal. [email protected] ABSTRACT This study aims to determine the impact of climate change on market garden production in the extreme south of Mali through the perception and adaptation of market gardeners to climatic phenomena. The study used two models, namely the probit selection and Heckman results models and multinomial logistic regression, based on data collected from producers. A total of 194 producers were surveyed. The results of Heckman's probit model indicate that experience in agriculture and the educational level of the producers are the two main determinants of producers' perception and simultaneous adaptation to climate change. Among these variables agricultural experience is both positively and negatively correlated with perception. Keywords: Adaptation, climate change, southern Mali, Heckman probit, vegetable production 1. INTRODUCTION Climate change and its impacts have now become one of the greatest challenges for humanity, its environment and its economies (IPCC, 2013). At the global level, climate change is reflected in the rise in the average temperature of the planet, the melting of glaciers, the rise in sea level and the increase in the frequency of extreme events, the disappearance of species of animal origin, changes in rainfall patterns, etc. The average temperature in the world will increase by 1.8°C to 4°C, and in the worst case 6.4°C by the end of this century (IPCC, 2007).
    [Show full text]