DOCSLIB.ORG

Read the Australian Financial Review Article

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Read the Australian Financial Review Article The Treasurer has literally lost the plot PUBLISHED: 07 MAR 2012 00:08:20 | UPDATED: 07 MAR 2012 04:06:14 THE AUSTRALIAN FINANCIAL REVIEW Where should Australia’s Treasurer be directing the national conversation right now? Perhaps he should be preparing Australians for a tough budget in May that will necessarily spread belt- tightening across the community while driving productivity-enhancing policy reforms to make the economy more flexible, to ease the painful adjustments of some industries to the high dollar and to encourage broader wealth generation as commodity export prices come off their peaks. Instead, Wayne Swan has spent the past few days indulging in a belligerent and almost incoherent rant against some of the entrepreneurs who are at the heart of the biggest mining boom in more than a century and who are helping drive the national income to unprecedented heights. Then yesterday he was put in the seemingly contradictory position of having to defend coalminers against attacks by Greenpeace and other environmental groups seeking funding from other wealthy entrepreneurs to disrupt and delay the new mines and infrastructure that would entrench this prosperity. Yet, with his rant against mining magnates Gina Rinehart, Clive Palmer and Andrew Forrest, wealth creation appears to have become, at least in Mr Swan’s eyes, a vice that runs against the grain of Australian society and which must therefore be fought against at all costs. Just two months before he hands down his fifth budget, this is a time when the Treasurer should be focused on trimming the fat from government spending and getting Australia’s budget out of deficit, particularly given the warning from our biggest export market that China is shaving its economic growth target. A truly reforming Treasurer also would be driving Labor’s internal debate on how to reverse the economy’s alarming productivity slowdown. Instead, Mr Swan appears fully behind Labor’s reregulation of the job market in ways that reinforce Australia’s traditional them-and-us culture industrial relations culture. He has also has backed Labor’s extension of government assistance to rent-seeking sectors of the economy such as the car industry and coastal shipping. Trapped by Labor’s fealty to its trade union backers, Mr Swan has reverted to the politics of envy and resentment and a form of class warfare more reminiscent of the 1950s. Among other things, this job market re-regulation is lifting the economy’s “natural’’ unemployment rate and hurting the very low-skilled workers he professes to champion. Mr Swan happily admits that his jihad against high-wealth individuals is a deep-seated part of his political “postcode’’ ideology. Yet Labor focus group polling also no doubtԜis showing that Opposition Leader Tony Abbott is scoring very well with Howard’s battlers in the electorate. Prime Minister Julia Gillard was defending the class-warfare mentality of her second-in- command, telling journalists in Canberra yesterday that she “commended” Mr Swan’s rambling essay in the latest edition of The Monthly magazine. But Business Council of Australia president Tony Shepherd was quick to expose the colander of holes in Mr Swan’s diatribe, noting in a joint press conference with Ms Gillard that Australia was “definitely not America” when it came to inequality. Mr Shepherd warned against political rhetoric that could lead to a “divided society”, while Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief Peter Anderson said Mr Swan’s anti-business campaign was “not a helpful intervention”. Contrary to Mr Swan’s silly claims, Australia’s middle class is not being hollowed out or exploited by a 1 per cent of the super-rich. Middle Australia is more prosperous than it has ever been, in part because of the entrepreneurial efforts of MsԜRinehart, Mr Palmer and Mr Forrest who, along the way, have broken into the iron ore duopoly of BHP Billiton and RioԜTinto. The Treasurer’s argument that our mining entrepreneurs are some sort of threat to democracy are ludicrous given the Labor-commissioned report by former judge Ray Finkelstein that would impose an unprecedented level of government intervention on Australia’s free and open press. It is further exposed by yesterday’s revelations that environmental groups are seeking to effectively sabotage Australia’s coal boom. Countering this threat to the living standards of the people Mr Swan professes to represent merely highlights the need to amplify the voice of the mining entrepreneurs Australia’s Treasurer is shamefully trying to vilify with attacks thatԜencourage some of the worst aspects of our national character. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1. Gina Rinehart 2. Anthony Pratt & Family • 3. Harry Triguboff
    1. Gina Rinehart $14.02billion from Resources Chairman – Hancock Prospecting Residence: Perth Wealth last year: $20.01b Rank last year: 1 A plunging iron ore price has made a big dent in Gina Rinehart’s wealth. But so vast are her mining assets that Rinehart, chairman of Hancock Prospecting, maintains her position as Australia’s richest person in 2015. Work is continuing on her $10billion Roy Hill project in Western Australia, although it has been hit by doubts over its short-term viability given falling commodity prices and safety issues. Rinehart is pressing ahead and expects the first shipment late in 2015. Most of her wealth comes from huge royalty cheques from Rio Tinto, which mines vast swaths of tenements pegged by Rinehart’s late father, Lang Hancock, in the 1950s and 1960s. Rinehart's wealth has been subject to a long running family dispute with a court ruling in May that eldest daughter Bianca should become head of the $5b family trust. 2. Anthony Pratt & Family $10.76billion from manufacturing and investment Executive Chairman – Visy Residence: Melbourne Wealth last year: $7.6billion Rank last year: 2 Anthony Pratt’s bet on a recovering United States economy is paying off. The value of his US-based Pratt Industries has surged this year thanks to an improving manufacturing sector and a lower Australian dollar. Pratt is also executive chairman of box maker and recycling business Visy, based in Melbourne. Visy is Australia’s largest private company by revenue and the biggest Australian-owned employer in the US. Pratt inherited the Visy leadership from his late father Richard in 2009, though the firm’s ownership is shared with sisters Heloise Waislitz and Fiona Geminder.
    [Show full text]
  • Palmer Puts Climate in the Centre AUTHOR
    TITLE: Palmer puts climate in the centre AUTHOR: Richard Denniss PUBLICATION: Australian Financial Review PUBLICATION DATE: 1/07/14 LINK: http://www.afr.com The day after Clive Palmer announced he would oppose the Abbott government’s efforts to abolish the 20 per cent renewable energy target, the price of market-traded renewable energy certificates jumped 27 per cent. The same day shares in Infigen, a company with a big portfolio of renewable energy generation, jumped 16 per cent. The next day, as the news sunk in, the shares rose another 2 per cent. But while the renewable energy end of the sharemarket reacted favourably to Clive’s big announcement with Al Gore, some reacted with pessimism and hostility. The Greens and Labor have every right to defend their now identical approach that abandons the carbon tax in favour of an immediate ETS. But the Palmer United Party’s plans to protect the RET, the Clean Energy Finance Corporation and the Climate Change Authority need to be encouraged or risk being unwound. Symbolism is important in politics. Al Gore’s endorsement was clearly valuable to Clive Palmer. But Al Gore’s objectives were more than symbolic. He wanted to help achieve real outcomes. By sharing a stage with Palmer, he helped reshape Australian politics. Had he done a press conference with Christine Milne, he’d have simply locked in politics as usual. Tony Abbott’s hostility to carbon pricing is entirely symbolic. We know it’s not a deeply held view, as he has confessed to being a “weather vane” on the issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Income Management and Indigenous Women: a New Chapter of Patriarchal Colonial Governance?
    2016 Thematic: Income Management and Indigenous Women 843 16 INCOME MANAGEMENT AND INDIGENOUS WOMEN: A NEW CHAPTER OF PATRIARCHAL COLONIAL GOVERNANCE? SHELLEY BIELEFELD* I INTRODUCTION Like other colonial countries, Australia has long governed its First Peoples with intrusive paternalism. Paternalistic governance has created ongoing problems for Australia’s First Peoples, also referred to in national discourse as Indigenous peoples and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. 1 Such paternalism has created specific difficulties for Indigenous women who have been subject to surveillance and controlled by colonialism in every sphere of their lives. This article will explore some of these forms of surveillance and argue that new forms of paternalism ushered in by ‘the global ascendance of neo- liberal policies and discourses’2 have reproduced similar racialised and gendered impacts for Indigenous women as were apparent in previous policies. Situating income management in a global context, welfare reform has been and continues to be underway in many Western nations as policies are fitted to the framework * Dr Shelley Bielefeld is the Inaugural Braithwaite Research Fellow at the RegNet School of Regulation and Global Governance at the Australian National University. The author wishes to thank Professor Jon Altman, Professor Larissa Behrendt, Associate Professor Thalia Anthony, Dr Marina Nehme, Dr Elise Klein and the anonymous reviewers for their most helpful comments on an earlier draft. This article was written whilst a visiting scholar at the Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research at the Australian National University and Jumbunna Indigenous House of Learning at the University of Technology Sydney. The author thanks both institutions for their gracious hospitality and their staff for such stimulating dialogue.
    [Show full text]
  • KUNINJKU PEOPLE, BUFFALO, and CONSERVATION in ARNHEM LAND: ‘IT’S a CONTRADICTION THAT FRUSTRATES US’ Jon Altman
    3 KUNINJKU PEOPLE, BUFFALO, AND CONSERVATION IN ARNHEM LAND: ‘IT’S A CONTRADICTION THAT FRUSTRATES US’ Jon Altman On Tuesday 20 May 2014 I was escorting two philanthropists to rock art galleries at Dukaladjarranj on the edge of the Arnhem Land escarpment. I was there in a corporate capacity, as a direc- tor of the Karrkad-Kanjdji Trust, seeking to raise funds to assist the Djelk and Warddeken Indigenous Protected Areas (IPAs) in their work tackling the conservation challenges of maintain- ing the environmental and cultural values of 20,000 square kilometres of western Arnhem Land. We were flying low in a Robinson R44 helicopter over the Tomkinson River flood plains – Bulkay – wetlands renowned for their biodiversity. The experienced pilot, nicknamed ‘Batman’, flew very low, pointing out to my guests herds of wild buffalo and their highly visible criss-cross tracks etched in the landscape. He remarked over the intercom: ‘This is supposed to be an IPA but those feral buffalo are trashing this country, they should be eliminated, shot out like up at Warddeken’. His remarks were hardly helpful to me, but he had a point that I could not easily challenge mid-air; buffalo damage in an iconic wetland within an IPA looked bad. Later I tried to explain to the guests in a quieter setting that this was precisely why the Djelk Rangers needed the extra philanthropic support that the Karrkad-Kanjdji Trust was seeking to raise. * * * 3093 Unstable Relations.indd 54 5/10/2016 5:40 PM Kuninjku People, Buffalo, and Conservation in Arnhem Land This opening vignette highlights a contradiction that I want to explore from a variety of perspectives in this chapter – abundant populations of environmentally destructive wild buffalo roam widely in an Indigenous Protected Area (IPA) declared for its natural and cultural values of global significance, according to International Union for the Conservation of Nature criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • The Datum Post May 2021 58
    ISSUE 59 The Datum Post May 2021 58 this issue eNews of the Presidents report P.3 Industry News P.13 Dardanup Open Day P.24 Perth Branch Newbie photos P.28 DO Remember safety in the bush is paramount, make sure your radio, GPS and PLB are working correctly before venturing out. There has already been a search for one prospector and APLA has received a number The Department of Mines, Industry Regulation of calls from people and Safety (DMIRS) is seeking feedback from seeking contact with family members industry on proposed amendments to the Mining detecting in WA that Act 1978. have not contacted relatives for long The Streamlining (Mining Amendment) Bill 2021 periods of time. aims to make legislative changes to improve efficiencies for the application and assessment of environmental approvals and support economic recovery following COVID-19. The Streamlining (Mining Amendment) Bill 2021 is now available for public comment until Friday 25 June 2021 SEE PAGE 8 FOR FURTHER DETAILS 1 APLA ASSOCIATION CONTACT DETAILS: State Delegates- admin President. Les Lowe [email protected] Secretary. Marise Palmer [email protected] Treasurer. Kurk Brandstater [email protected] Branch Officers of APLA Perth Branch President. Greg Young [email protected] Treasurer. Marise Palmer [email protected] Secretary. Sue. McKenna [email protected] Albany Branch President. Gerry.Gregson [email protected] Secretary. Bruce.Smith [email protected] Mandurah Branch There are a lot of tourists President. Alan.Branchi [email protected] travelling on WA roads at the moment. Secretary. Bob.Wilson [email protected] Take care travelling and book Treasurer Amanda Holmes [email protected] into caravan parks prior to travelling.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilbara Traditional Owners Upset with Andrew Forrest Over $400M Donation Announcement
    Pilbara traditional owners upset with Andrew Forrest over $400m donation announcement By Joseph Dunstan 23 May 2017 Yindjibarndi elders (from left) Margaret Read, Rosemary Woodley and Judith Coppin (ABC North West WA: Joseph Dunstan) Traditional owners of the land on which one of Andrew Forrest's iron ore mines sits say the mining magnate's announcement of a $400 million donation yesterday feels like a "kick in the teeth". The Yindjibarndi people in Western Australia's remote Pilbara are the recognised traditional owners of the land where Fortescue Metals Group's (FMG) Solomon Mine is located. For the past eight years, the Yindjibarndi Aboriginal Corporation (YAC) has been in conflict with FMG over what constitutes fair compensation from the site. YAC's CEO Michael Woodley said news of Mr Forrest's multi-million-dollar donation to a range of charitable causes upset him. 2 "If it wasn't serious you'd be laughing about it … because this is a kick in the teeth to the Yindjibarndi people," Mr Woodley said. "Giving $400 million away from the country that he's mining, which belongs to the Yindjibarndi people, and other traditional owner groups as well around the Pilbara." Michael Woodley, CEO of the Yindjibarndi Aboriginal Corporation, says Andrew Forrest is giving away proceeds from their land. The deal put forward by FMG offered significant employment on its mine sites and scholarships for families, but did not offer large lump sums to be paid to YAC. Mr Forrest has long maintained that large cash payments to Aboriginal corporations constitute "corporate cash welfare" and fail to produce tangible benefits to the Aboriginal communities they represent.
    [Show full text]
  • State Revival the Role of the States in Australia’S COVID-19 Response and Beyond
    State revival The role of the states in Australia’s COVID-19 response and beyond Australia’s states and territories have taken the lead in addressing the COVID-19 pandemic, supported by constitutional powers and popular mandates. With the states newly emboldened, further action on climate change, changes to federal–state financial arrangements and reform of National Cabinet could all be on the agenda. Discussion paper Bill Browne July 2021 ABOUT THE AUSTRALIA INSTITUTE The Australia Institute is an independent public policy think tank based in Canberra. It is funded by donations from philanthropic trusts and individuals and commissioned research. We barrack for ideas, not political parties or candidates. Since its launch in 1994, the Institute has carried out highly influential research on a broad range of economic, social and environmental issues. OUR PHILOSOPHY As we begin the 21st century, new dilemmas confront our society and our planet. Unprecedented levels of consumption co-exist with extreme poverty. Through new technology we are more connected than we have ever been, yet civic engagement is declining. Environmental neglect continues despite heightened ecological awareness. A better balance is urgently needed. The Australia Institute’s directors, staff and supporters represent a broad range of views and priorities. What unites us is a belief that through a combination of research and creativity we can promote new solutions and ways of thinking. OUR PURPOSE – ‘RESEARCH THAT MATTERS’ The Institute publishes research that contributes to a more just, sustainable and peaceful society. Our goal is to gather, interpret and communicate evidence in order to both diagnose the problems we face and propose new solutions to tackle them.
    [Show full text]
  • Is It Ethical for the Former WA Treasurer to Join the Rio Tinto and Woodside
    _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Is it ethical for the former WA treasurer to join the Rio Tinto and Woodside boards? It's certainly a good look to appoint the first Indigenous director of a major Australian company. But when he was previously the tax man, the picture blurs a little. Former Western Australian Treasurer Ben Wyatt Stephen Mayne JUN 09, 2021 The appointment of former Western Australian Labor treasurer Ben Wyatt to the Rio Tinto and Woodside boards last week is at one level a great development because he is the first Indigenous director of any major Australian public company. However, from a governance point of view, there really should be a cooling-off period before former politicians can be paid by corporate entities they used to regulate or tax — or under-tax, in the case of Wyatt and Rio Tinto. Wyatt is the cousin of federal Liberal MP Ken Wyatt and retired from the WA parliament after a 15-year career at the state election in March. Rio Tinto, like all the major WA iron ore miners, was pleasantly surprised that the treasurer of a WA Labor government didn’t try to jack up state royalty rates during this unprecedented boom. When combined with soaring Chinese demand, this low-tax approach has generated untold riches for the miners. As Crikey noted recently, the AFR’s 2021 Rich List featured iron ore moguls Gina Rinehart and Andrew Forrest at the top with an obscene combined family value of 2 $67.8 billion. And all of this unprecedented private wealth comes from publicly owned WA iron ore resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Wealth Creators
    Wealth Creators • $1.4bn in dividends for Kerry Stokes, Andrew Forrest in past five years • Top 50 public company investors worth about $11 billion • Contractors, lithium miners performing well • Rod Jones hopeful on tech investments Healthy dividend in building wealth The five WA people with the largest holdings in listed companies have earned around $1.5 billion in dividends in the past five years, with Andrew Forrest and Kerry Stokes leading the way. Matt Mckenzie TRIPLING of the past five years (see One wealth creator Mr Ellison has rein- [email protected] Fortescue Metals table, page 23). ranking high on the list vested a portion of those @Matt_Mckenzie_ A Group’s dividend But despite the higher but receiving minimal gains, with about 30,000 this year to 45 cents dividend, Fortescue’s dividends is prospector shares bought through per share has produced share price dropped from Mark Creasy. MinRes’s plan in the past a near $500 million around $6 in November His shareholdings are two years. windfall for chairman last year to be $4.67 on worth about $530 mil- Mr Ellison has also Andrew Forrest. November 20, the cut-off lion, the bulk of which enjoyed a rapid capi- Mr Forrest controls date for compiling the are in gold and nickel tal gain via the MinRes a third of Fortescue 2017 BNiQ Search Engine miner Independence shares, with the value of through a range of vehi- Wealth Creators list (see Group, which acquired his portfolio more than cles, including Forrest page 26). Sirius Resources in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Sound and Fury: the Resources Tax
    Sound and Fury: The Resources Tax Issue 12, August 2010 | Sarah Burnside Illustrating that this is an era of globalised politics, the ill-fated resources super profits tax (RSPT) is now invoked as a warning to other countries against ‘resource nationalism’. In a recent speech to mining executives in London, Rio Tinto chief executive Tom Albanese suggested that ‘policymakers around the world can learn a lesson when considering a new tax to plug a revenue gap, or play to local politics’1. Australia, presumably, has learned its lesson. However, debates over the amended minerals rent resource tax (MRRT) continue. Discussions regarding the proposed tax over the past few months have demonstrated not only the overabundance of acronyms in public life, but some of the inconsistencies in the Australian political discourse. The proposed tax, derived from the Henry Tax Review, was controversial from the outset. In June, The Australian’s editorial warned then Prime Minister Kevin Rudd that ‘political leaders who appeal to noisy activists lose elections’2. The editorial criticised the RSPT, urging Rudd to ignore unions and environmentalists and embrace ‘the sensible centre’. The timing was somewhat ironic; mere days earlier West Australians had been treated to ‘noisy activists’ of another political stripe. The ‘billionaires’ rally’ on 8 June, organised by the Association of Mining and Exploration Companies (AMEC), saw magnates Gina Rhinehart and Andrew Forrest join other protesters in filling the Perth Esplanade with cries of ‘axe the tax’. There seemed to be some cognitive dissonance on the part of the national newspaper: those who were heckling Government ministers, taking to the streets and engaging in public protest (albeit with neat, correctly spelled placards) were not from the left.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Title Contestation in Western Australia's Pilbara Region
    www.crimejusticejournal.com IJCJ&SD 2014 3(3): 132‐148 ISSN 2202–8005 Native Title Contestation in Western Australia’s Pilbara Region Paul Cleary1 Australian National University, Australia Abstract The rights afforded to Indigenous Australians under the Native Title Act 1993 (NTA) are very limited and allow for undue coercion by corporate interests, contrary to the claims of many prominent authors in this field. Unlike the Commonwealth’s first land rights law, Aboriginal Lands Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 (ALRA) , the NTA does not offer a right of veto to Aboriginal parties; instead, they have a right to negotiate with developers, which has in practice meant very little leverage in negotiations for native title parties. And unlike ALRA, developers can deal with any Indigenous corporation, rather than land councils. These two factors have encouraged opportunistic conduct by some developers and led to vexatious litigation designed to break the resistance of native title parties, as demonstrated by the experience of Aboriginal corporations in the iron ore‐rich Pilbara region of Western Australia. Keywords Native title; mining companies; Aboriginal corporations; iron ore mining. Introduction Some leading academics in Australia have argued that the rise of the minerals sector over the past decade, combined with legislative reforms by state and federal governments, have created unprecedented opportunities to transform the lives of Indigenous Australians. Moreover, some Indigenous academics, such as Langton and Mazel (2012: 26), say that these institutional and cultural changes have been transformative. A number of law academics with recognised expertise in this area have strongly endorsed the view that the institution of native title law, together with corporate social responsibility, has vastly improved the situation for Indigenous Australians faced with industrial resources developments often on a massive scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Inquiry Question on Notice
    PARLIAMENTARY INQUIRY QUESTION ON NOTICE Department of Health Senate Select Committee on COVID-19 Australian Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic 22 May 2020 PDR Number: IQ20-000246 Question Subject: TGA approved medicines Type of Question: Written Senator: Katy Gallagher Question: Have any medicines been approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration for the treatment of COVID-19. If so, which medicines. Answer: No medicines have been approved for the treatment of COVID-19 in Australia at this time. Some products have been provided to individual patients through unapproved products pathways, such as the Authorised Prescriber and Special Access Schemes. The Department of Health, through the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), liaises closely with potential sponsors and international regulatory counterparts to monitor the intensive international research effort that is currently underway. The TGA will prioritise and expedite the evaluation of any applications from industry or research sponsors for the treatment of COVID-19 or vaccination against the SARS-CoV2 virus. PARLIAMENTARY INQUIRY QUESTION ON NOTICE Department of Health Senate Select Committee on COVID-19 Australian Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic 22 May 2020 PDR Number: IQ20-000248 Question Subject: Palmer Foundation hydroxychloroquine purchase Type of Question: Written Senator: Katy Gallagher Question: Is this claim by Mr Clive Palmer true: “Clive Palmer’s Palmer Foundation has bought over 32,900,000 doses of hydroxychloroquine. Millions of doses of the drug have already arrived in Australia. The Palmer Foundation has already paid for the drug in the form of tablets and bulk pharmaceuticals. The Palmer Foundation has donated the drug to the Australian Government to be placed on the National Medical Stockpile so it may be made available free to all Australians.” If so: (a) on what date/s did “million of doses of the drug” arrive in Australia.
    [Show full text]