Report of the Secondary Place Planning Group on the Need for Extra Year 7 Admission Places Between 2015-2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report of the Secondary Place Planning Group on the Need for Extra Year 7 Admission Places Between 2015-2019 EARLY HELP and SCHOOLS REPORT OF THE SECONDARY PLACE PLANNING GROUP ON THE NEED FOR EXTRA YEAR 7 ADMISSION PLACES BETWEEN 2015-2019 November 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY There is a need to consider providing additional secondary places across the Borough from September 2015 onwards. The Local Authority has set up a Stakeholder Working Group to consider this and to formulate proposals for public consultation. This Report follows the end of that consultation and puts forward proposals to meet the increased demand for extra Year 7 Secondary School places in the period to September 2019 The number of children wanting Year 7 places in the Borough’s secondary schools will rise from 2,263 this school year to an estimated 2,819 by September 2019. The level of demand varies across the Borough, and in some areas growth will continue beyond 2020. The focus of the report covers the period to September 2019. The report puts forward a number of proposals to make sure that there are enough places to meet the minimum demand as well as enough extra places to allow for parental preference and future within year movements. The view of the Working Group is that extra places can be provided by expansion on current school sites. Where applicable, the implementation of proposals is subject to the support of own admission authority schools, their Trusts and Diocesan Authorities. Secondary Place Planning Group- Final Report Nov14 v1 Page 1 REPORT OF THE SECONDARY PLACE PLANNING GROUP ON THE NEED FOR EXTRA YEAR 7 ADMISSION PLACES BETWEEN 2015-2019 INTRODUCTION and BACKGROUND 1. This report sets out details of the need for additional secondary school places in the period 2015-2019. Based on current projections additional Year 7 places will be needed in each Township in that period. The Local Authority has a statutory duty to secure sufficient school places in its area, and is the strategic commissioner for the provision of additional places that might be required. 2. In order to plan effectively to meet the expected increase in demand, in December 2013 Rochdale Local Authority set up a Stakeholder Group comprising representatives of Secondary Headteachers, College Principals, Elected Members, school governors, Primary Headteachers and Diocesan Authorities to look at the supply and demand for additional secondary school places. 3. The remit of the Group, therefore, was to look at the strategy for meeting the need for extra pupil places across the Borough over the next five years (2015 onwards), to consult on such revised proposals and report to the Executive Member Children Schools & Families on the outcomes of that consultation by Autumn 2014. The membership of the Group comprised: • Executive member for Children Schools and Families, plus 3 elected Members nominated by the respective Group Leaders; • Assistant Director- Early Help and Schools; • 4 Secondary Headteachers nominated through the Pioneer Trust; • 1 person nominated by the Manchester Diocese (Church of England); • 1 person nominated by the Salford Diocese (Roman Catholic Church); • 1 Primary Headteacher (nominated by Rochdale Association of Primary Headteachers); • Principal Hopwood Hall College; • Principal Rochdale Sixth Form College • 1 School Governor nominated through the Independent Governor Forum 4. The purpose of this report is to present final proposals for the Cabinet of Rochdale Borough Council to consider. This follows as to how many additional places ought to be provided, and where and when they should be provided. Secondary Place Planning Group- Final Report Nov14 v1 Page 2 SECONDARY SCHOOL PLACE DEMAND- BOROUGH OVERVIEW 5. The current provision of secondary places in the Borough is through 12 secondary schools. The location of these schools is shown on the map at Appendix One . The current numbers of children in these schools is shown as Appendix Two . The number of places available in each school, and the type of school is set out in Appendix Three . Details of how the Local Authority develops pupil number projections is set out at Appendix Four . The pupil number projections take account of past patterns of demand, and for secondary places goes up to September 2024. EXPECTED DEMAND FOR YEAR 7 SECONDARY PLACES 2015-2019 6. From September 2014 the number of Year 7 pupils for admission to secondary schools will begin to increase across the Borough. Overall there is enough space in the secondary sector to accommodate the growth in intakes until 2017, after then more places will need to be available. The following graph shows the overall position to 2019. School year 2013/14 2014/15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Year 7 Places 2550 2610 2610 2610 2610 2610 2610 Expected Pupils 2263 2382 2560 2533 2614 2769 2819 Extra Places Needed Enough places overall -4 -159 -209 FUTURE DEMAND FOR PLACES 2020-2024 7. The pattern and extent of growth in demand is not evenly distributed across the townships and it is important to keep in mind the growth trend to September 2024. The following graph shows the overall long term demand which indicates that there will be high level of demand for extra places until 2024. Secondary Place Planning Group- Final Report Nov14 v1 Page 3 2013/14 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 BOROUGH 2011/12 2012/13 2017/18 2018/19 Year 6 Pupils 2468 2420 2392 2447 2622 2614 2693 2847 2892 2902 2942 2963 2982 2967 Year 7 Expected Pupils 2382 2560 2533 2614 2769 2819 2828 2805 2857 2866 2839 Year 7 Places 2570 2550 2550 2610 2610 2610 2610 2610 2610 2610 2610 2610 2610 2610 Extra Places Needed enough places overall -4 -159 -209 -218 -215 -247 -256 -229 8. The above graph shows the overall net effect of movement in and out of the Borough between Year 6 and Year7. Each year this averages about 6%, so that in place planning terms the Local Authority does not expect to provide enough places for all children currently in Year 6 classes across the Borough. However, to take account of potential change to this trend, and allowance for parental preference and within year movement, the projections allow a margin of 3% for growth. Further background information on the movement of children across the borough boundary is set out in Appendix Four . SECONDARY SCHOOL PLACE DEMAND- HEYWOOD TOWNSHIP 9. There are two secondary schools in Heywood Township, both substantially re-modelled and re-built under the Building Schools for the Future Programme. Siddal Moor is a Community School with 210 Year 7 places, and a total capacity of 1050 places. Holy Family Roman Catholic/Church of England College is a joint faith Voluntary Aided School with 120 Year 7 Places, a total capacity of 600 places. EXPECTED DEMAND FOR YEAR 7 PLACES- HEYWOOD TOWNSHIP 2015-2019 10. In recent years there has been an increase in the number of children born in the Township, and this increase in numbers will move through to the secondary sector. At Secondary Place Planning Group- Final Report Nov14 v1 Page 4 primary school level additional places were provided on a short term basis at Woodland Community Primary (CP) School and Harwood Park CP School. An additional 15 Reception class places have been provided at Hopwood CP School on a long term basis. 11. The pie chart below shows the Heywood Year 6 pupil destinations for school year 2013- 2014. It shows the proportion of pupils progressing to the township’s secondary schools, and those choosing to attend schools outside the Township and the Borough. This trend is looked at each year and is the basis for projecting future demand for places. 12. Overall there are enough secondary places in the township to 2018. However, from 2017 there may not be a sufficient margin to allow for parental preference, growth and within- year movement, and so the provision of additional Year 7 places needs to be considered for the period 2017-2019, as shown by the following graph: Secondary Place Planning Group- Final Report Nov14 v1 Page 5 School year 2013/14 2014/15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Year 7 Places 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 Expected Pupils 277 277 303 306 323 324 339 Extra Places Needed Enough places overall 7 6 -9 FUTURE DEMAND FOR PLACES IN HEYWOOD TOWNSHIP 2020-2024 13. The expected demand for Year 7 places between 2020 and 2024 in Heywood is shown below. There will be a need to monitor changes in demand to ensure there are sufficient places overall, with a margin for flexibility. 2013/14 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2011/12 2012/13 2017/18 2018/19 Year 6 Pupils 354 361 304 302 330 334 353 354 370 354 338 371 356 351 Year 7 Expected Pupils 315 307 277 277 303 306 323 324 339 323 310 340 325 321 Year 7 Places 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 Extra Places Needed enough places overall 7 6 -9 7 20 -10 5 9 SUMMARY AND PROPOSALS TO MEET THE ADDITIONAL DEMAND IN HEYWOOD TOWNSHIP 14. Whilst there are just enough places up to 2018, there may not be enough places to allow for parental preference, within-year growth or demand changes. Both Holy Family RC/CE College and Siddal Moor Sports College have indicated a willingness to accommodate more pupils. The proposal for consultation was that up to an extra 30 Year 7 places (One Form of Entry) are to be considered in the township, from 2017 onwards, to be provided at either Holy Family or Siddal Moor.
Recommended publications
  • Bus Franchising Scheme and Notice
    Public Document BUS FRANCHISING SCHEME & NOTICE – 30 March 2021 This page is intentionally left blank Agenda Item 1 TRANSPORT ACT 2000 The Greater Manchester Franchising Scheme for Buses 2021 Made 30/03/2021 ARRANGEMENT OF THE SCHEME 1. CITATION AND COMMENCEMENT…………………………………………………………………………………1 2. INTERPRETATION………………………………………………………………………………………………….……...1 3. THE FRANCHISING SCHEME AREA AND SUB-AREAS………………………………………………….…..2 4. ENTRY INTO LOCAL SERVICE CONTRACTS……………………………………………………………………..2 5. SERVICES UNDER LOCAL SERVICE CONTRACTS………………………………………………….………….3 6. EXCEPTIONS FROM THE SCHEME……………………………………………………………………….………..3 7. SCHEME FACILITIES………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..3 8. PLAN FOR CONSULTING ON OPERATION OF THE SCHEME……………………………………………4 ANNEXES TO THE SCHEME………………………………………………………………………………………………………..5 ANNEX 1: SERVICES INCLUDED – ARTICLE 5…………………………………………………………………….………..5 ANNEX 2: SERVICES INCLUDED – ARTICLE 5.2.3………………………………………………………………………..11 ANNEX 3: EXCEPTED SERVICES – ARTICLE 6………………………………………………………………………………14 ANNEX 4: TEMPORARY EXCEPTIONS – ANNEX 3 PARAGRAPHS 1.2 AND 1.3……………………………..15 ANNEX 5: FRANCHISING SCHEME SUB-AREAS…………………………………………………………………………..18 Page 1 WHEREAS: A The Transport Act 2000 (as amended) ("2000 Act") makes provision for a franchising authority to make a franchising scheme covering the whole or any part of its area. The GMCA is a franchising authority as defined in the 2000 Act. B The GMCA gave notice of its intention to prepare an assessment of a proposed scheme in accordance with sections 123B and section 123C(4) of the 2000 Act on 30 June 2017. Having complied with the process as set out in the Act, the GMCA may determine to make the scheme in accordance with sections 123G and 123H of the 2000 Act. NOW, therefore, the Mayor on behalf of the GMCA, in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 123G and 123H of the 2000 Act, and of all other enabling powers, hereby MAKES THE FOLLOWING FRANCHISING SCHEME (the "Scheme"): 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary School Places 2021 and 2022
    Report to Cabinet Date of Meeting 29th September 2020 Portfolio Cabinet Member for Children's Services Report Author Fay Davies Public/Private Document Public Appendix 1 - Private Secondary School Places 2021 and 2022 Executive Summary 1.1 Rochdale Council is awaiting delivery of two new mainstream Secondary schools that are being delivered by the Department for Education, DfE, through the Free school programme. The DfE will not guarantee when the schools will open until planning consent for the schools is guaranteed and until a date for practical completion is set. 1.2 Until that date the council must work to meet its statutory obligation to offer every child living in the borough a place in Secondary school. 1.3 The Schools Organisation and Development Team are working closely with the DfE to deliver the new schools as soon as possible but must also plan for the scenario where any new school places are delayed. This report details these plans. Recommendation 2.1 That Cabinet approve the release of funds from Basic Need capital funding to deliver additional places at Wardle Academy for 2021 and 2022 as detailed in appendix 1. 2.2 That Cabinet recognise that the delivery of our much needed Secondary schools through the central government Free school programme leaves the council dependent on timings and decisions by central government with regards to the delivery of those schools, and consequently puts at risk delivery of its statutory duty to offer a school place to every child living in the borough. 2.3 That Cabinet approve the release of funds from Basic Need capital funding to meet the need to deliver 120 additional places for September 2021 in existing borough Secondary schools, as detailed in appendix 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rochdale Science and Technology Challenge Day for Gifted and Talented Year 8 and Year 9S
    The Rochdale Science and Technology Challenge Day for Gifted and Talented Year 8 and Year 9s What are the Science & Technology Days for? How are they rated? They raise enthusiasm for STEM subjects and encour- Evaluations of last year’s events indicated that…. age young people to consider studying them further. 98% of the teachers and 87% of the young people con- In 2014, MCS Projects Ltd organised 40 Challenge Days sidered their Day to have been ‘good’ or ‘very good’. across the UK, involving more than 250 schools. 76% of the young people were more likely to consider What happens? studying STEM subjects at college or university as a result of the event. Twelve Gifted and Talented Year 8/9s are invited to participate from each school. Working together in mixed school teams of four, they undertake practical activities that increase their awareness of the applica- tion of science. Each activity is designed to develop skills that will be needed in the workplace, with marks being awarded for planning, team work and the finished product. Challenge Days are usually held on the campus of a local college or university. The young people undertake three 75min activities. The local Mayor or Deputy Lieu- The overall winning teams from each Challenge Day tenant is invited to present awards to members of each progress to one of our regional Finals In 2014, the Finals winning team. were hosted by the Universities of Cambridge, Man- chester and Sheffield. Director: P.W.Waterworth 12 Edward Terrace, Sun Lane, Alresford, Hampshire SO24 9LY Registered in England: No 4960377 • VAT Reg.
    [Show full text]
  • Rochdale Borough Council Community Secondary Schools
    Determination Case reference: ADA3560 Objector: A parent Admission authority: Rochdale Borough Council for community secondary schools in Rochdale Date of decision: 27 June 2019 Determination In accordance with section 88H(4) of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998, I do not uphold the objection to the admission arrangements for September 2020 determined by Rochdale Borough Council for community secondary schools in Rochdale. The referral 1. Under section 88H(2) of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 (the Act) an objection has been referred to the adjudicator by a parent (the objector) about the admission arrangements (the arrangements) for the community secondary schools in Rochdale for September 2020. The objection is that the priority given to children on the basis of the proximity of their homes to the nearest school is unfair to some pupils. 2. The parties to this objection are the objector and Rochdale Borough Council (the local authority). Jurisdiction 3. These arrangements were determined under section 88C of the Act on 25 February 2019 by the local authority, which is the admission authority for the schools. The objector submitted her objection to these determined arrangements on 2 May 2019. I am satisfied the objection has been properly referred to me in accordance with section 88H of the Act and it is within my jurisdiction. 4. Regulation 22 of The School Admissions (Admission Arrangements and Co- ordination of Admission Arrangements) (England) Regulations 2012 says “For the purposes of section 88H(5)(d), where the adjudicator has determined an objection to the admission arrangements of a school or Academy, no objection may be referred to the adjudicator raising the same or substantially the same issues in relation to those admission arrangements within 2 years of the decision by the adjudicator.” Determination REF3486 made by the adjudicator in December 2018 considered similar issues to those in this objection.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Middleton Township Committee, 12
    Public Document Pack Meeting of: Middleton Township Committee Date: Thursday, 12th November, 2020 Time: 6.00 pm. Venue: Zoom Meeting This agenda gives notice of items to be considered in private as required by Regulations 5 (4) and (5) of The Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) (Meetings and Access to Information) (England) Regulations 2012. Item AGENDA Page No No. 1 Apologies To receive any apologies for absence. 2 Declarations of Interest Members are required to declare any disclosable pecuniary, personal or personal and prejudicial interests they may have and the nature of those interests relating to items on this agenda and/or indicate if S106 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 applies to them. 3 Urgent Items of Business To determine whether there are any additional items of business which, by reason of special circumstances, the Chair decides should be considered at the meeting as a matter of urgency. 4 Items for Exclusion of Public and Press To determine any items on the agenda, if any, where the public are to be excluded from the meeting. 5 Minutes 3 - 5 To consider the Minutes of the meeting held on 17th September 2020. 6 Need for Primary School Places 2021 - 2024 6 - 21 Report of Director of Children’s Services regarding future primary school provision in the Borough – for information. 7 Secondary School Places 2021 and 2022 22 - 28 Report of Director of Children’s Services regarding the provision of secondary school places in the Borough in 2021 and 2022 – for information. Middleton Township Committee Members Councillor
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary School Places 2021 and 2022
    Report to Cabinet Date of Meeting 29th September 2020 Portfolio Cabinet Member for Children's Services Report Author Fay Davies Public/Private Document Public Appendix 1 - Private Secondary School Places 2021 and 2022 Executive Summary 1.1 Rochdale Council is awaiting delivery of two new mainstream Secondary schools that are being delivered by the Department for Education, DfE, through the Free school programme. The DfE will not guarantee when the schools will open until planning consent for the schools is guaranteed and until a date for practical completion is set. 1.2 Until that date the council must work to meet its statutory obligation to offer every child living in the borough a place in Secondary school. 1.3 The Schools Organisation and Development Team are working closely with the DfE to deliver the new schools as soon as possible but must also plan for the scenario where any new school places are delayed. This report details these plans. Recommendation 2.1 That Cabinet approve the release of funds from Basic Need capital funding to deliver additional places at Wardle Academy for 2021 and 2022 as detailed in appendix 1. 2.2 That Cabinet recognise that the delivery of our much needed Secondary schools through the central government Free school programme leaves the council dependent on timings and decisions by central government with regards to the delivery of those schools, and consequently puts at risk delivery of its statutory duty to offer a school place to every child living in the borough. 2.3 That Cabinet approve the release of funds from Basic Need capital funding to meet the need to deliver 120 additional places for September 2021 in existing borough Secondary schools, as detailed in appendix 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Developments Await Design Accolades
    Jan 27, 2014 09:30 GMT Local developments await design accolades The waiting is nearly over for eight local developments shortlisted for Rochdale Borough Design Awards. The winners of the fifth annual awards will be announced on Thursday 20 February during a ceremony at Rochdale Town Hall. They will be presented by Steve McIntyre, partner with architects Faulkner Browns and John Jones, Design Director at Countryside Properties. Three awards will be made on the night, including the Rochdale Borough Design Award and the Sustainable Development Award, decided by a panel of experts, together with the People’s Design Award, decided by the public. Owners and architects are now eagerly awaiting the results. Competing for the awards are: The Pioneers Museum, Rochdale; Holy Family College, Heywood; Kingsway Park High School, Rochdale; Brownhill Learning Community, Rochdale; Middleton Technology School, Middleton; the housing development at the corner of Waithlands Road and Grafton Street, Rochdale; The housing development at the corner of Longridge Drive and Ashford Street, Heywood; Maden’s Square housing development, Littleborough. Councillor Peter Williams, Cabinet Member for Economic Development and Customer Services at Rochdale Borough Council said the awards are a showcase for the high quality build and design in buildings around the borough: “I am very pleased to see these eight outstanding shortlisted buildings in the borough, following on from Number One Riverside - the public library and council offices in Rochdale which has already won two prestigious awards. It really illustrates the quality of design we have ... every year the standard is improving, and I am proud to support these awards which help ensure high quality design is encouraged in the future.” John Jones, Design Director at Countryside Properties added: “We are delighted to be involved in the competition and particularly excited to see so many buildings that have made a difference to their community.
    [Show full text]
  • School Bus Services in Rochdale September 2017 to July 2018
    School Bus Services in Rochdale September 2017 to July 2018 Services in this leaflet operate on schooldays only, unless otherwise stated. Although provided primarily for school students, members of the public may use these services with the exception of Yellow School Buses. Services are listed alphabetically under school names. Rochdale-Schools.docx - 1 - 28/09/17 An introduction to School buses and concessionary fares for students in Greater Manchester Passengers can pay a fare to the driver for each journey shown on this timetable. However, students will need to show an IGO pass to travel at the concessionary (reduced) fare. If students do not have an IGO pass, they will have to pay a higher fare. Most of the journeys shown in this timetable are funded by Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM). The majority of TfGM funded services charge a standard fare and also offer daily return tickets. In some cases, the return ticket can also be used for travel on other journeys which serve similar areas – even if it is provided by a different operator. On most services, students can also buy a weekly scholar’s ticket, which costs £7.00. These are ONLY valid on schooldays on school buses and are available from the bus driver on all services where they are applicable. To help the driver, please try to have the correct fare when buying your ticket. A summary of fares and ticketing information on all school services included in this timetable can be found at http://www.tfgm.com/journey_planning/Pages/back-to-school.aspx There are also a small number of TfGM funded services where the operator sets the fares.
    [Show full text]
  • Need for Additional Secondary School Places 2015-2024 Status
    Subject: Need for Additional Secondary School Status: For Publication Places 2015-2024 Report to : Heywood Township Committee Date: Monday, 14 July 2014 Pennines Township Committee Tuesday,15 July 2014 Rochdale Township Committee Wednesday, 16 July 2014 Middleton Township Committee Thursday, 17th July 2014 Cabinet Member: Cabinet member for Children Schools and Families Report of: Director- Children’s Services Author: Chris Swift School Organisation & Development Author Email: [email protected] Manager Tel: 01706 925016 Comments from Statutory Officers: Key Decision: No 1 Purpose of Report 1.1 The purpose of this report is to enable the Township Committees to give their views on the need for extra secondary school places from 2015 to 2019. 2 Recommendations 2.1 The Township Committees are asked to consider this report and to make such Comments as appropriate on the following proposals:- * For Heywood Township up to an extra 30 Year 7 places are provided from 2017, either at Siddal Moor or Holy Family RC CE College; * For Middleton Township an extra 30 Year 7 places are provided at each of St.Anne’s Academy from 2017 and Cardinal Langley RC High School from 2016; * For Pennines Township an 30 extra places at each of Wardle Academy and Hollingworth Academy from 2015-2017, and further extra places for 2018 and 2019 are considered in the light of capacity in Pennines Township and proposals for extra places in Rochdale Township; * For Rochdale Township an extra 60 places will be needed to meet Township demand in 2018 and 2019. The 4 schools in Rochdale Township to be possibly considered for the extra 30 places each are Falinge Park, Kingsway Park, Matthew Moss, and St.Cuthberts’ RC.
    [Show full text]
  • School Bus Services in Rochdale September 2019 to July 2020
    School Bus Services in Rochdale September 2019 to July 2020 Services in this leaflet operate on schooldays only, unless otherwise stated. Services are listed alphabetically under school names. Rochdale Schools 2019-2020 website - 1 - 18/10/19 An introduction to School buses and concessionary fares for students in Greater Manchester Passengers can pay a fare to the driver for each journey shown on this timetable. However, students will need to show an IGO pass to travel at the concessionary (reduced) fare. If students do not have an IGO pass, they will have to pay a higher fare. Most of the journeys shown in this timetable are funded by Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM). The majority of TfGM funded services charge a standard fare and also offer daily return tickets. In some cases, the return ticket can also be used for travel on other journeys which serve similar areas – even if it is provided by a different operator. On most services, students can also buy a weekly scholar’s ticket, which costs £7.40. These are ONLY valid on schooldays on school buses and are available from the bus driver on all services where they are applicable. To help the driver, please try to have the correct fare when buying your ticket. A summary of fares and ticketing information on all school services included in this timetable can be found at https://www.tfgm.com/tickets-and-passes/bus-school-bus-services There are also a small number of TfGM funded services where the operator sets the fares. You will need to check with the operator what fares are available.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondaryschoolspendinganaly
    www.tutor2u.net Analysis of Resources Spend by School Total Spending Per Pupil Learning Learning ICT Learning Resources (not ICT Learning Resources (not School Resources ICT) Total Resources ICT) Total Pupils (FTE) £000 £000 £000 £/pupil £/pupil £/pupil 000 Swanlea School 651 482 1,133 £599.2 £443.9 £1,043.1 1,086 Staunton Community Sports College 234 192 426 £478.3 £393.6 £871.9 489 The Skinners' Company's School for Girls 143 324 468 £465.0 £1,053.5 £1,518.6 308 The Charter School 482 462 944 £444.6 £425.6 £870.2 1,085 PEMBEC High School 135 341 476 £441.8 £1,117.6 £1,559.4 305 Cumberland School 578 611 1,189 £430.9 £455.1 £885.9 1,342 St John Bosco Arts College 434 230 664 £420.0 £222.2 £642.2 1,034 Deansfield Community School, Specialists In Media Arts 258 430 688 £395.9 £660.4 £1,056.4 651 South Shields Community School 285 253 538 £361.9 £321.7 £683.6 787 Babington Community Technology College 268 290 558 £350.2 £378.9 £729.1 765 Queensbridge School 225 225 450 £344.3 £343.9 £688.2 654 Pent Valley Technology College 452 285 737 £339.2 £214.1 £553.3 1,332 Kemnal Technology College 366 110 477 £330.4 £99.6 £430.0 1,109 The Maplesden Noakes School 337 173 510 £326.5 £167.8 £494.3 1,032 The Folkestone School for Girls 325 309 635 £310.9 £295.4 £606.3 1,047 Abbot Beyne School 260 134 394 £305.9 £157.6 £463.6 851 South Bromsgrove Community High School 403 245 649 £303.8 £184.9 £488.8 1,327 George Green's School 338 757 1,096 £299.7 £670.7 £970.4 1,129 King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Boys 211 309 520 £297.0 £435.7 £732.7 709 Joseph
    [Show full text]
  • A SHINING EXAMPLE Award-Winning Teaching in Our Spirit Project the NEWS MAGAZINE of FALINGE PARK HIGH SCHOOL
    Autumn 2013 Issue 19 Opening doors, unlocking potential A SHINING EXAMPLE Award-winning teaching in our Spirit project THE NEWS MAGAZINE OF FALINGE PARK HIGH SCHOOL A tradition of New school excellence builds on our past THIS is a term of conflicting emotions. We move out of our old 1935 building, which has served generations of children here in north Rochdale, first as the AFTER operating as a school since 1935, our school Grammar School for Girls, then Greenhill building will soon no longer exist. Upper School and, latterly, Falinge Park However, over the years, the building has High School. However, it is time to pack undergone several extensions and modifications up and move next door into our new to accommodate increasing student numbers and home with its outstanding new facilities. educational needs. On a more positive note, I must A new school was first considered in 2007, and congratulate Year 11 who achieved the the design has been through several revisions, best results at 5+ A*-C including English reductions and locations, which have resulted in and Mathematics in Rochdale Township. the new building we will soon call home. Some This means there are only another parts of the existing school have been refurbished couple of Local Authority schools for us rather than renewed, but these works are very to catch. What better motivation for our much in keeping with the new build. current Year 11 students to work hard. Robin Lonsdale, Headteacher Turning pounds Award for MFL into profit Bs linguistics THE Tenner Challenge is a nationwide competition to IN recognition of their hard work, find the next generation of budding entrepreneurs.
    [Show full text]