Open Access and the Future of Scientific Publishing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Open Access and the Future of Scientific Publishing Features Open Access and the Future of Scientific Publishing Carrie Lock sions follow the data, and the research has climaxed in 2001, when 30,000 scientists In 1665, Henry Oldenburg, publisher and some degree of relevance. Once an article in 180 countries signed a boycott letter prolific letter writer, changed the future passes peer review, the journal publishes calling on publishers to make their work of science. His legacy, the Philosophical it months or even years later, and other freely available in online libraries within 6 Transactions of the Royal Society of London, scientists in that particular field eventually months. They pledged not to “publish in, spawned the dominant form of scientific read it. In recent times, some journal edi- edit or review for, or personally subscribe communication for the next 3½ centuries. tors have taken steps to accelerate publica- to” journals that do not comply. “The Robert Hooke and Isaac Newton waged tion, such as posting articles online before current business model is unsustainable, intellectual battles over springs, optics, they appear in print. since it is now economically and physi- and gravity in its pages. By the late 19th Financial problems, however, have cally possible to disseminate an article century, other journals, including Nature recently plagued the scientific publishing worldwide at zero cost”, says Peter Suber, and Physical Review, had sprung up, and industry. Nonprofit and academic organi- publisher of the Open Access Newsletter of as scientific progress marched along, zations used to dominate the business, but the Scholarly Publishing and Academic their pages filled with articles by Albert for-profit publishers entered the industry Resources Coalition, an organization of Einstein, Marie Curie, and other scientific during the research boom of World War universities and libraries that aims to raise luminaries. II. Today, they publish 2 million articles awareness about this issue. “It’s a dysfunc- Journals hold a special place in the lives a year with $8 billion in annual revenue. tional system; [publishers] are racing into a of scientists. The number of articles they Most journals cost hundreds to thousands brick wall”, says Suber. publish and in what journals substantially of dollars for an annual subscription, but Some changes have already taken place affects the course of their entire careers— some, like Brain Research and Combustion to satisfy researchers and keep traditional where they work, how much funding they Science and Technology, cost nearly $20,000 journals financially viable. Almost all get, and the respect of their peers. For per year. That forces all but the wealthi- journals published today put at least some some, articles are not just a means of com- est universities and foundations to cancel of their articles on the Internet, retain- munication, but the end products in and some subscriptions. Journals are expensive ing subscriptions by making the journals of themselves. Today, however, business to produce, no matter how many subscrib- worth their high cost in the eyes of buy- pressures and emerging technologies seem ers they have. As the number of subscrib- ers. Large databases link electronic articles likely to change everything about scientific ers goes down, prices rise for the fewer together, and scientists use search engines communication—who finances it, who has institutions that must share the total cost like Web of Science to gather, in a matter access to it, even the very definition of a of publication. In a vicious circle, rising of minutes, the same information it previ- scientific journal. prices induce even more subscribers to ously would have taken months to find. Since their inception, these journals cancel. That circle applies to all types of Electronic versions of articles have quickly generally have worked the same way. journals, although the more specialized the become indispensable to scientists. “I have Authors submit their research for publica- audience, the more important the impact. journals going back for years on the shelves tion in the most prestigious journal they If 100 libraries cancel their subscriptions to in my office”, says Vivian Siegel, executive can. Their colleagues, commonly three, Nature, it barely affects this journal’s bot- director of the open-access biology journal read and review the article anonymously tom line; but it might be the death knell PLoS Biology. “[But] if I need an article, I’ll and recommend that the editor accept or for Colloid and Surface Science. get it online. It doesn’t even occur to me to reject the article for publication, as well The shrinking number of those with read hard copies any more.” as noting its strengths and weaknesses access to scientific journals angers However, that an article is online doesn’t and suggesting revisions. Peer review does researchers all over the world, as the ever- necessarily mean that all researchers who not certify that the results are correct; the increasing costs of print publications shut want to read it can. Most scientists are reviewers do not replicate the experiments out researchers in poorer institutions. It affiliated with universities or research cen- or analyze the data. It only means that isn’t only Third World organizations that ters and collectively subscribe to journals the methodology is sound, the conclu- can’t keep up—many small to midsize US through their institutions’ libraries. Online universities have had to pare down their subscriptions are sometimes cheaper than CARRIE LOCK is pursuing a master’s subscriptions, making some of the more the expensive print format, but publishers degree in science journalism at Boston specialized, esoteric journals unavailable often bundle the two together, offering University. to researchers. Researchers’ frustrations online subscriptions “free” to libraries that 122 • Science Editor • July - August 2004 • Vol 27 • No 4 Features Open Access continued also purchase the print journals. In those the publication fee for authors who can’t changes are indeed likely to occur within circumstances, if scientists’ research insti- afford it. Readers, primarily other research- the next 10 to 15 years. Siegel predicts tutions can’t afford the print format, they ers, benefit when they have access to more that 95% of all articles will be available can’t access electronic articles either. That articles. Theoretically, everyone wins when freely through searchable databases within hurdle is prompting scientists to search for scientists can communicate more effi- a decade and that open-access journals alternative ways to develop an open-access ciently—research is done faster, discovery will eventually replace their traditional system in which articles are available free, is accelerated, and mistakes are uncovered print counterparts. Although open-access online, to anyone in the world. more quickly. The public finances the bulk journals will publish the bulk of day-to-day In recent years, open-access journals of American research through taxes, the scientific research, she thinks there will have made major gains in the publishing argument goes, so shouldn’t the public have always be a place for “research magazines” industry. The for-profit BioMed Central, a a right to see what it’s paying for? No one like Science and Nature. Those journals, general collection of over 100 more specif- wins under the current system except the with a large breadth of topics and a diverse ic open-access journals, published its first “extraordinarily greedy publishers . who paying audience, are taking a watchful article in 2000 with a novel pay-to-publish charge up to 10 times as much as the non- waiting stance toward open-access publish- business model. BioMed Central makes profits for an equivalent product”, says Paul ing. “Switching to open access now would money by charging authors or their insti- Ginsparg, professor of physics at Cornell mean the demise of the journal”, says tutions a $1000 to $1500 processing fee University and developer of a pioneering Katrina Kelner, deputy editor of Science. and supporting advertising on its Web site. large-scale database of scientific articles. “We would have to do it cautiously and in Also in 2000, the National Institutes of The path from the current journal sys- a responsible way.” Health Director Harold Varmus launched tem to an open-access one, however, has Today, PLoS and BioMed Central look PubMed Central, a database in which not been smooth. Some researchers fear like online versions of traditional journals, publishers can deposit their articles 6 that open-access journals will not imple- but in the future, the whole concept of months to a year after original publication. ment quality control, in the form of peer a journal may change. Scientists could Researchers can then search and access review, in the same way as traditional simply deposit their papers in their insti- the database at no charge, and traditional print journals. Some members of the sci- tutional archival database. As long as they publishers can continue to profit with their ence-editing community wonder how used compatible software to publish it, traditional business models. Over 50% of thoroughly, if at all, papers in open-access anyone with an Internet connection could articles in medicine and health are avail- journals will be edited and thus whether use a Google-like search engine to find it. able freely from PubMed Central, although quality will suffer. A journal using the pay- A “journal” might be like a virtual Good not until well after they are initially pub- to-publish business model might be more Housekeeping Seal of Approval—it would lished, which is still unsatisfactory to many inclined to accept papers of questionable tell readers something about the topic, researchers. In October 2003, the Public quality to keep up its revenue. Researchers how it relates to the field, and, perhaps Library of Science, a nonprofit organiza- also worry that funding scandals might be most important, its general quality, but tion of scientists and physicians advocat- much more likely when authors finance it would have no physical meaning.
Recommended publications
  • A Quick Guide to Scholarly Publishing
    A QUICK GUIDE TO SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING GRADUATE WRITING CENTER • GRADUATE DIVISION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA • BERKELEY Belcher, Wendy Laura. Writing Your Journal Article in 12 Weeks: A Guide to Academic Publishing Success. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2009. Benson, Philippa J., and Susan C. Silver. What Editors Want: An Author’s Guide to Scientific Journal Publishing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013. Derricourt, Robin. An Author’s Guide to Scholarly Publishing. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996. Germano, William. From Dissertation to Book. 2nd ed. Chicago Guides to Writing, Editing, and Publishing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013. ———. Getting It Published: A Guide for Scholars and Anyone Else Serious about Serious Books. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016. Goldbort, Robert. Writing for Science. New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 2006. Harman, Eleanor, Ian Montagnes, Siobhan McMenemy, and Chris Bucci, eds. The Thesis and the Book: A Guide for First- Time Academic Authors. 2nd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003. Harmon, Joseph E., and Alan G. Gross. The Craft of Scientific Communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010. Huff, Anne Sigismund. Writing for Scholarly Publication. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 1999. Luey, Beth. Handbook for Academic Authors. 5th ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Luey, Beth, ed. Revising Your Dissertation: Advice from Leading Editors. Updated ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007. Matthews, Janice R., John M. Bowen, and Robert W. Matthews. Successful Scientific Writing: A Step-by-Step Guide for the Biological and Medical Sciences. 3rd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Moxley, Joseph M. PUBLISH, Don’t Perish: The Scholar’s Guide to Academic Writing and Publishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Journal Article: Writing Summaries and Critiques Definition of Genre Summaries and Critiques Are Two Ways to Write a Review of a Scientific Journal Article
    How to Read and Review a Scientific Journal Article: Writing Summaries and Critiques Definition of Genre Summaries and critiques are two ways to write a review of a scientific journal article. Both types of writing ask you first to read and understand an article from the primary literature about your topic. The summary involves briefly but accurately stating the key points of the article for a reader who has not read the original article. The critique begins by summarizing the article and then analyzes and evaluates the author’s research. Summaries and critiques help you learn to synthesize information from different sources and are usually limited to two pages maximum. Actions to Take 1. Skim the article without taking notes: cture.” 2. Re-read the article more carefully: is at the very end of the paper) and “Results” sections. Was the study repeated? What was the sample size? Is this representative of the larger population? What variables were held constant? Was there a control? What factors might affect the outcome? 3. Read the “Materials and Methods” and “Results” sections multiple times: raphs, tables, and diagrams. 4. Before you begin the first draft of your summary: Try to describe the article in your own words first. Try to distill the article down to its “scientific essence.” -written summary: The egg capsules of the marine snails Nucella lamellosa and N. lima protect developing embryos against low-salinity stress, even though the solute concentration within the capsules falls to near that of the surrounding water within about 1 h. 5. Write a draft of your summary: and avoid unintentional plagiarism.
    [Show full text]
  • An Initiative to Track Sentiments in Altmetrics
    Halevi, G., & Schimming, L. (2018). An Initiative to Track Sentiments in Altmetrics. Journal of Altmetrics, 1(1): 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29024/joa.1 PERSPECTIVE An Initiative to Track Sentiments in Altmetrics Gali Halevi and Laura Schimming Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, US Corresponding author: Gali Halevi ([email protected]) A recent survey from Pew Research Center (NW, Washington & Inquiries 2018) found that over 44 million people receive science-related information from social media channels to which they subscribe. These include a variety of topics such as new discoveries in health sciences as well as “news you can use” information with practical tips (p. 3). Social and news media attention to scientific publications has been tracked for almost a decade by several platforms which aggregate all public mentions of and interactions with scientific publications. Since the amount of comments, shares, and discussions of scientific publications can reach an audience of thousands, understanding the overall “sentiment” towards the published research is a mammoth task and typically involves merely reading as many posts, shares, and comments as possible. This paper describes an initiative to track and provide sentiment analysis to large social and news media mentions and label them as “positive”, “negative” or “neutral”. Such labels will enable an overall understanding of the content that lies within these social and news media mentions of scientific publications. Keywords: sentiment analysis; opinion mining; scholarly output Background Traditionally, the impact of research has been measured through citations (Cronin 1984; Garfield 1964; Halevi & Moed 2015; Moed 2006, 2015; Seglen 1997). The number of citations a paper receives over time has been directly correlated to the perceived impact of the article.
    [Show full text]
  • The Digital Brain Bank: an Open Access Platform for Post-Mortem Datasets
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.21.449154; this version posted June 22, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. The Digital Brain Bank: an open access platform for post-mortem datasets Benjamin C. Tendler1, Taylor Hanayik1, Olaf Ansorge2, Sarah Bangerter-Christensen2, Gregory S. Berns3, Mads F. Bertelsen4, Katherine L. Bryant1, Sean Foxley1,5, Amy F.D. Howard1, Istvan Huszar1, Alexandre A. Khrapitchev6, Anna Leonte2 Paul R. Manger7, Ricarda A.L. Menke1, Jeroen Mollink1, Duncan Mortimer1, Menuka Pallebage- Gamarallage2, Lea Roumazeilles8, Jerome Sallet8,9, Connor Scott2, Adele Smart1,2, Martin R. Turner1,2, Chaoyue Wang1, Saad Jbabdi1*, Rogier B. Mars1,10,*, Karla L. Miller1* 1Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom 2Division of Clinical Neurology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom 3Psychology Department, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America 4Centre for Zoo and Wild Animal Health, Copenhagen Zoo, Frederiksberg, Denmark 5Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America 6Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom 7School of Anatomical Sciences,
    [Show full text]
  • The Thomson Scientific Journal Selection Process
    PERSPECTIVES INTERNATIONAL MICROBIOLOGY (2006) 9:135-138 www.im.microbios.org James Testa The Thomson Scientific Director of Editorial journal selection process Development, Thomson Scientific, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA E-mail: [email protected] several multidisciplinary citation indexes. In addition to its Introduction three major components, the Science Citation Index Expanded, the Social Sciences Citation Index, and the Arts The Web of Knowledge is an electronic platform that consists of and Humanities Citation Index, it includes Index Chemicus important searchable bibliographic databases and key analytical and Current Chemical Reactions. Since significant resources tools, such as the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). Several of are dedicated to the selection of the most important and influ- these bibliographic databases pro- ential journals for inclusion in the WoS, we will examine the vide extensive coverage of the lit- journal selection process used erature of specific subjects, such to achieve this goal, particu- as the Life Sciences, Agriculture larly with regard to citation and Forestry, Food Science, Phy- analysis and the role of the sics and Engineering, Medicine, impact factor. Behavioral Sciences, and Animal The journal selection Biology (Fig. 1). The internation- process has been applied con- al patent literature and conference sistently for more than 45 proceedings are also key compo- years. Every journal included nents of the Web of Knowledge. in the WoS has been evaluated In all, this environment covers according to the highest stan- over 22,000 unique journals, more dards, which were originally than 60,000 conferences from defined by Eugene Garfield, 1990 to the present, and approxi- the founder and president mately one and a half million Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing the RDA Research Data Policy Framework in Slovenian Scientific Journals.Data Science Journal, 19: 49 Pp
    Štebe, J, et al. 2020. Implementing the RDA Research Data Policy Framework in Slovenian Scientific Journals. Data Science Journal, 19: 49 pp. 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-049 RESEARCH PAPER Implementing the RDA Research Data Policy Framework in Slovenian Scientific Journals Janez Štebe, Maja Dolinar, Sonja Bezjak and Ana Inkret Slovenian Social Science Data Archives (ADP – Arhiv družboslovnih podatkov), University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, SI Corresponding author: Janez Štebe ([email protected]) The paper aims to present the implementation of the RDA research data policy framework in Slovenian scientific journals within the project RDA Node Slovenia. The activity aimed to implement the practice of data sharing and data citation in Slovenian scientific journals and was based on internationally renowned practices and policies, particularly the Research Data Policy Framework of the RDA Data Policy Standardization and Implementation Interest Group. Following this, the RDA Node Slovenia coordination prepared a guidance document that allowed the four pilot participating journals (from fields of archaeology, history, linguistics and social sciences) to adjust their journal policies regarding data sharing, data citation, adapted the definitions of research data and suggested appropriate data repositories that suit their dis- ciplinary specifics. The comparison of results underlines how discipline-specific the aspects of data-sharing are. The pilot proved that a grass-root approach in advancing open science can be successful and well-received in the research community, however, it also pointed out several issues in scientific publishing that would benefit from a planned action on a national level. The context of an underdeveloped data sharing culture, slow implementation of open data strategy by the national research funder and sparse national data service infrastructure creates a unique environment for this study, the result of which can be used in similar contexts worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal List Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science) 2020
    JOURNAL TITLE ISSN eISSN PUBSLISHER NAME PUBLISHER ADDRESS 3C EMPRESA 2254‐3376 2254‐3376 AREA INNOVACION & DESARROLLO C/ELS ALZAMORA NO 17, ALCOY, ALICANTE, SPAIN, 03802 3C TECNOLOGIA 2254‐4143 2254‐4143 3CIENCIAS C/ SANTA ROSA 15, ALCOY, SPAIN, 03802 3C TIC 2254‐6529 2254‐6529 AREA INNOVACION & DESARROLLO C/ELS ALZAMORA NO 17, ALCOY, ALICANTE, SPAIN, 03802 3D RESEARCH 2092‐6731 2092‐6731 SPRINGER HEIDELBERG TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, HEIDELBERG, GERMANY, D‐69121 3L‐LANGUAGE LINGUISTICS LITERATURE‐THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES 0128‐5157 2550‐2247 PENERBIT UNIV KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA PENERBIT UNIV KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA, FAC ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT, BANGI, MALAYSIA, SELANGOR, 43600 452 F‐REVISTA DE TEORIA DE LA LITERATURA Y LITERATURA COMPARADA 2013‐3294 UNIV BARCELONA, FACULTAD FILOLOGIA GRAN VIA DE LES CORTS CATALANES, 585, BARCELONA, SPAIN, 08007 AACA DIGITAL 1988‐5180 1988‐5180 ASOC ARAGONESA CRITICOS ARTE ASOC ARAGONESA CRITICOS ARTE, HUESCA, SPAIN, 00000 AACN ADVANCED CRITICAL CARE 1559‐7768 1559‐7776 AMER ASSOC CRITICAL CARE NURSES 101 COLUMBIA, ALISO VIEJO, USA, CA, 92656 A & A PRACTICE 2325‐7237 2325‐7237 LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS TWO COMMERCE SQ, 2001 MARKET ST, PHILADELPHIA, USA, PA, 19103 ABAKOS 2316‐9451 2316‐9451 PONTIFICIA UNIV CATOLICA MINAS GERAIS DEPT CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS, AV DOM JOSE GASPAR 500, CORACAO EUCARISTICO, CEP: 30.535‐610, BELO HORIZONTE, BRAZIL, MG, 00000 ABANICO VETERINARIO 2007‐4204 2007‐4204 SERGIO MARTINEZ GONZALEZ TEZONTLE 171 PEDREGAL SAN JUAN, TEPIC NAYARIT, MEXICO, C P 63164 ABCD‐ARQUIVOS
    [Show full text]
  • Career in Scientific Publishing (….With Post-Graduate Degree)
    University of Pennsylvania Career in scientific publishing (….with post-graduate degree) Min Cho, Ph.D. Associate Editor Nature Publishing Group Do not distribute without permission University of Pennsylvania Scientific editing as a career What does a scientific editor do, exactly? Do not distribute without permission University of Pennsylvania Core tasks of a manuscript editor ….is in the manuscript selection process. (i.e. does the journal publish a submitted manuscript or not?) Scientific editing as career Do not distribute without permission University of Pennsylvania Core tasks of a manuscript editor - Read new manuscript submissions – Is the conclusion scientifically justified? - LdhdiLead the discuss ion w ihhith other e ditors an d ma ke initial editorial decision; to review or editorially reject? - Manage manuscripts through external review; assign reviewers, make decisions, write letters. - Check accepted manuscripts pre-publication Scientific editing as career Do not distribute without permission University of Pennsylvania …but nowhere near as glamorous as Do not distribute without permission University of Pennsylvania The Edi tori al P rocess Do not distribute without permission University of Pennsylvania Papers go in... Publication process Papers come o ut ... Editorial Process Do not distribute without permission University of Pennsylvania Papers go in... Publication process Papers come o ut ... But what happened inside the box??? Editorial Process Do not distribute without permission University of Pennsylvania Editorial
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Deficient Phagocytosis on Neuronal Survival
    F1000Research 2017, 6:1827 Last updated: 09 MAR 2020 STUDY PROTOCOL Stage 1 Registered Report: Effect of deficient phagocytosis on neuronal survival and neurological outcome after temporary middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAo) [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] Julius V. Emmrich 1, Jonas J. Neher2,3, Philipp Boehm-Sturm1,4, Matthias Endres1,5, Ulrich Dirnagl 1,5,6, Christoph Harms1,6 1Department of Experimental Neurology and Center for Stroke Research, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany 2German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tübingen, Germany 3Department of Cellular Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany 4NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence and Charité Core Facility 7T Experimental MRIs, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany 5German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany 6QUEST – Center for Transforming Biomedical Research, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany First published: 12 Oct 2017, 6:1827 ( Open Peer Review v1 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12537.1) Second version: 14 Nov 2017, 6:1827 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12537.2) Reviewer Status Latest published: 16 May 2018, 6:1827 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12537.3) Invited Reviewers 1 2 Abstract Stroke is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. In addition to version 3 neuronal death resulting directly from energy depletion due to lack of blood (revision) supply, inflammation and microglial activation following ischemic brain 16 May 2018 injury has been increasingly recognized to be a key contributor to the pathophysiology of cerebrovascular disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Factor, H-Index, I10-Index and I20-Index of Webology
    Webology, Volume 13, Number 1, June, 2016 Home Table of Contents Titles & Subject Index Authors Index Impact Factor, h-index, i10-index and i20-index of Webology Alireza Noruzi Editor-in-Chief of Webology; Assistant Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Iran. E-mail: noruzi (at) ut.ac.ir Abstract The purpose of this editorial note was to conduct a citation analysis of the Webology journal in order to show the journal impact factor, h-index, i10-index, i20-index, and patent citations. This note indicates to what extent the Webology journal is used and cited by the international scientific community. The results show that the total number of citations to Webology papers on Google Scholar was 2423 and the total number of citations received by i20 papers (i.e., 24 papers with at least 20 citations) was 1693. This reveals that i20 papers received 70 percent of all citations to Webology. Keywords Citation analysis, Impact factor; H-index; i10-index; i20-index; Webology Introduction The publication of Webology was first started in August 2004 as an open access journal. It is an international peer-reviewed journal in English devoted to the field of the World Wide Web and serves as a forum for discussion and experimentation. It serves as a forum for new research in information dissemination and communication processes in general, and in the context of the World Wide Web in particular. There is a strong emphasis on the World Wide Web and new information and communication technologies. As the Webology journal continues to grow, it is important to remain aware of where we stand relative to our peers.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Altmetrics Landscape
    Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Charleston Library Conference Overview of the Altmetrics Landscape Richard Cave Public Library of Science, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston Part of the Library and Information Science Commons An indexed, print copy of the Proceedings is also available for purchase at: http://www.thepress.purdue.edu/series/charleston. You may also be interested in the new series, Charleston Insights in Library, Archival, and Information Sciences. Find out more at: http://www.thepress.purdue.edu/series/charleston-insights-library-archival- and-information-sciences. Richard Cave, "Overview of the Altmetrics Landscape" (2012). Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference. http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284315124 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. Overview of the Altmetrics Landscape Richard Cave, Director of IT and Computer Operations, Public Library of Science Abstract While the impact of article citations has been examined for decades, the “altmetrics” movement has exploded in the past year. Altmetrics tracks the activity on the Social Web and looks at research outputs besides research articles. Publishers of scientific research have enabled altmetrics on their articles, open source applications are available for platforms to display altmetrics on scientific research, and subscription models have been created that provide altmetrics. In the future, altmetrics will be used to help identify the broader impact of research and to quickly identify high-impact research. Altmetrics and Article-Level Metrics Washington as an academic research project to rank journals based on a vast network of citations The term “altmetrics” was coined by Jason Priem, (Eigenfactor.org, http://www.eigenfactor.org/ a PhD candidate at the School of Information and whyeigenfactor.php).
    [Show full text]
  • The Need for Open-Access, Structured Data in Clinical Brain Research
    Bunevicius A. Biomed Data J. 2015;1(1): 27-32 http://dx.doi.org/10.11610/bmdj.01104 ISSN 2367-5322 datajournals.eu: The European Open Data portal Policy Paper The Need for Open-access, Structured Data in Clinical Brain Research Adomas Bunevicius Neuroscience Institute and Department of Neurosurgery, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania http://lsmuni.lt/en/structure/medical-academy-/neuroscience-institute/ ARTICLE INFO : A B S T R A C T RECEIVED: 22 Sep 2014 Neurological and psychiatric disorders are considered major public health prob- REVISED: 02 Nov 2014 lems associated with a significant number of suffering patients and an enormous ACCEPTED: 14 Nov 2014 socioeconomic burden to societies. Therefore, significant research funds have ONLINE: 04 Jan 2015 been allocated towards improving outcomes of patients suffering from brain disorders. In recent years, researchers have been facing a constantly growing worldwide pressure to make their datasets freely and readily available to other K E Y W O R D S: researchers and the public. The major goal of this movement is to allow re-use of already collected data in order to facilitate medical progress. There are numer- Open Access ous ways that clinical neuroscience researchers and research organizations Dataset commonly employ to make their databases available. Institutional databases and Brain Diseases publicly available research and clinical data repositories and registries are the Disease Models most common ways to share data among researchers and organizations in order Data Sharing to facilitate collaboration. In addition, numerous traditional neuroscience peer reviewed journals have implemented various data sharing policies. Furthermore, a few traditional clinical neuroscience peer review journals have recently started accepting dataset papers.
    [Show full text]