The Management of Liver Trauma During the Past 40 Years, Haemorrhage Has Remained the Commonest Cause of Death
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.61.714.289 on 1 April 1985. Downloaded from Postgraduate Medical Journal (1985) 61, 289-293 Review Article The management ofliver trauma R. Macfarlane University ofCambridge, Cambridge, UK. Summary: Despite advances in the management of liver trauma during the past 40 years, haemorrhage has remained the commonest cause of death. This article outlines the diversity of opinion between the desire to determine the extent ofdamage and resect devitalised tissue with its attendant risk of exacerbating haemorrhage, and the alternative of a more conservative approach. Introduction The incidence of both blunt and penetrating Assessment and resuscitation abdominal injury is steadily increasing, and the liver is copyright. one of the organs most commonly involved. De- The patient with exsanguinating intra-abdominal celerating injuries cause the liver to tort on its haemorrhage or a penetrating wound is rarely a peritoneal attachments often resulting in linear lacera- diagnostic problem, but some 30% of patients with tions, whilst crushing injuries to the right hypochon- liver injury are normotensive on admission with drium may inflict deep fissured lacerations (Walt, minimal abdominal signs, only to deteriorate 1974). Occasionally, sudden compression and expan- sometime over the following twelve hours (Walt, sion ruptures the parenchyma whilst the capsule 1974). In addition to peritonism and an increasing remains intact. Although some 50% of liver injuries abdominal girth, right lower rib fractures, clothing http://pmj.bmj.com/ are minor and require no active treatment (Lucas & pattern marks on the abdomen, or Kehr's sign (right Ledgerwood, 1976), extensive injuries continue to be a upper quadrant and shoulder tip pain) should raise major challenge to surgical skill. Associated trauma to suspicion of a liver injury. However, the severity of the hepatic veins or inferior vena cava is particularly insult is not a good guide to the extent of trauma grave, and these problems are compounded by the (Walt, 1980). Assessment may be difficult, particularly presence of injuries to other organs in 90% of cases where there is an associated head injury, and it should (Walt, 1974). Mortality relates not only to the extent be remembered that hypotension is rarely due to head on September 23, 2021 by guest. Protected of hepatic injury, but directly to the number of other injury alone. Chest and abdominal X-rays, although organs involved (Levin et al., 1978). essential, are seldom diagnostic, but abdominal Management has turned almost full circle in the past paracentesis is particularly useful in doubtful cases. 40 years; conservative measures adopted during Good resuscitation is of the utmost importance in World War II were associated with a poor prognosis determining morbidity and mortality after trauma. A (Madding et al., 1945) and led to the adoption ofmore well stocked bloodbank and an experienced anaesthet- radical methods (Foster et al., 1968; Ackroyd et al., ist are essential, and concomitant injuries to other 1969). However during this time haemorrhage re- structures should not be overlooked. Respiratory mained the commonest cause of death (Mays, 1976), distress syndrome and coagulopathy are common in and attention subsequently returned to more con- patients receiving massive transfusions, and blood servative measures (Levin et al., 1978; Walt, 1978). warmers and filters should therefore be used early, together with fresh frozen plasma and platelets, where R. Macfarlane, M.A., M.B., B.Chir. appropriate, to compensate for washout coagulo- Correspondence: 2, Mawson Road, Cambridge. CB1 2EA pathy (Clagett & Olsen, 1978). Accepted: 13 August 1984 If a patient with siis'ected liver injury is stable and C) The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine, 1985 Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.61.714.289 on 1 April 1985. Downloaded from 290 R. MACFARLANE abdominal girth is not increasing, management is Grade III conservative, but close observation for signs of de- terioration is necessary. Further investigation in the Initial control of haemorrhage may be achieved by form of ultrasound, liver-spleen scan or computerised temporary packing and occlusion of the porta hepatis tomography may be appropriate in some instances by the Pringle manoeuvre (Pringle, 1908). A warm (Athey & Rahman, 1982; Evans et al., 1976; Lutzker & ischaemic time of up to an hour is considered accepta- Chun, 1981). ble (Huguet et al., 1978). Visualisation ofthe source of Evidence of continuing bleeding will require bleeding may be difficult if the dome of the liver is laparotomy, and wherever possible this should be involved, and failure to achieve control by the Pringle delayed until the haemodynamic state is stable. Bleed- manoeuvre indicates the possibility of major venous ing into the closed abdomen tamponades the source in injury. Having gained control, definitive steps may be most cases thus allowing some resuscitation, whereas taken for more permanent haemostasis, but it is here early surgery may prolong the period of hypotension that opinion is diverse, and any decision must take into with irretrievable consequences. Early surgery in hy- account the state of the patient and the experience of potensive patients significantly increases mortality the surgeon. There are several options: (Neely, 1977). (1) Basic surgical principles favour debridement of non-viable tissue, local haemostasis by suture ligation, followed by closure of deadspace either by deep Surgical management sutures or the use of a viable omental pack (Stone & Lamb, 1975; Pachter et al., 1983). However the risk is Because haemorrhage is the commonest cause ofearly of provoking further haemorrhage, and some reports death following liver trauma, and extensive surgical suggest that lack ofdebridement does not significantly procedures carry the highest mortality, it is suggested increase morbidity (Lucas, 1976). that the objective in the first instance should be to do (2) Local control can often be achieved by deep sutures the minimum to control the bleeding. This will allow a and closure over collagen buttons. It too has been further period of resuscitation before definitive treat- criticised on the grounds ofleaving a closed deadspace ment is undertaken as a semi-elective procedure and thereby predisposing to haematoma formation, (Calne et al., 1979). This however is only appropriate secondary haemorrhage, or liver abcess (Olsen, 1982).copyright. where some form of adequate haemostasis has been In practice this is uncommon (Mays, 1976). achieved in the first instance. (3) Selective ligation of the hepatic artery may be The line oftreatment followed will depend upon the required in addition to the above, providing that trial extent of damage, but there is no single accepted occlusion has been successful (Aaron et al., 1975). It classification (Table I). should be remembered that anomalous origin ofeither hepatic artery is not uncommon. Although doing Grades I & II nothing to control bleeding from retrograde flow in http://pmj.bmj.com/ hepatic veins, venous haemorrhage may often be The majority of these are not actively bleeding at the subsequently controlled by tamponade (Mays et al., time of surgery, and no further action is necessary. 1979), and this procedure has been widely used with When suturing is required, deep, tight sutures should good results (Foster et al., 1968; Flint et al., 1977). be avoided in preference to precise placement in order Rearterialization of the liver occurs rapidly via to avoid devitalizing tissue and encouraging secondary collaterals (Mays & Wheeler, 1974; Koehler et al., sepsis. Most surgeons drain these injuries, although 1975), and hepatic necrosis is extremely rare (Lucas & this has been criticized as both unnecessary and Ledgerwood, 1978; Flint & Polk, 1979). on September 23, 2021 by guest. Protected predisposing to retrograde infection (Fischer et al., (4) Packing, although widely criticized in the past 1978). (Madding et al., 1945), can be a life-saving procedure (Feliciano et al., 1981; Svoboda et al., 1982). If the above measures have failed to control haemorrhage, Table I Classification of liver injury lobectomy is the only thing likely to save the patient, but even in the best of hands carries a 50% mortality Grade I Capsular tear with no parenchymal et damage (Trunkey al., 1974; Walt, 1978). This figure may be Grade II Parenchymal damage responding to sim- considerably higher when performed on the critically ple haemostatic measures ill patient by an inexperienced surgeon. Packing the Grade III Parenchymal damage with major arterial injury for a period of48-72 hours not only allows for or venous haemorrhage a period of stabilization, but also transfer to a Grade IV Extensive parenchymal damage specialized unit if required. Often the packs can be associated with injury to major hepatic removed without the need for further intervention, but veins or retrohepatic inferior vena cava facilities must be at hand to proceed to major resection Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.61.714.289 on 1 April 1985. Downloaded from THE MANAGEMENT OF LIVER TRAUMA 291 (Calne et al., 1982). Packing is not appropriate for their onset may be delayed and insidious. transferring a patient if the bleeding has not been Hypoglycaemia, although rare, may be encountered controlled. The patient is likely to exsanguinate before after lobectomy, and such cases should have a 10% lobectomy can be achieved by an experienced surgeon dextrose