A Physiological Disorder of Peppers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Physiological Disorder of Peppers HORTSCIENCE 52(1):4–9. 2017. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI11123-16 results to interested readers, not only of aca- demic interest but commercial as well. This Capsicum review should facilitate advances toward a A Review of Chile Pepper ( deeper understanding of the disorder leading to effective treatments and additional preven- annuum) Stip: A Physiological Disorder tive measures instead of repeating previously of Peppers conducted, yet difficult to obtain, studies. Description of Lesions James C. Fulton1 Plant and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Symptoms of stip appear as pale to dark Cruces, NM 88003 green (Eijsinga et al., 1973; Hibberd, 1981; Smith et al., 1996, 1997, 1998), yellow Mark E. Uchanski2,3 (Aloni et al., 1994; Feigin and Sagiv, 1987; Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Colorado State University, Fort Smith et al., 1996, 1997, 1998), or black (Smith et al., 1996, 1997, 1998; Villalon, Collins, CO 80523-1173 1975) lesions in pepper pod tissue. Affected Additional index words. abiotic disorder, environmental stress, bell, chile tissue may be sunken (Eijsinga et al., 1973; Feigin and Sagiv, 1987; Hibberd, 1981; Abstract. Stip, a physiological disorder, which affects certain pepper (Capsicum annuum) Villalon, 1975), oval or irregularly shaped cultivars and pod types, has received limited formal academic attention. The disorder, (Hibberd, 1981; Villalon, 1975). Chlorotic frequently noted for its appearance in bell peppers, but also present in pimento and New or necrotic areas of pod wall cells (Hibberd, Mexican pod types, has been attributed in the literature to nutrient imbalances and/or 1981; Villalon, 1975) have been reported as temperature extremes. Symptoms of this disorder present on fully developed fruits as between 1 and 10 mm in diameter (Eijsinga brown, black, and yellow ovoid subcutaneous chlorotic lesions ’1.3 cm in length and 0.6 cm et al., 1973; Feigin and Sagiv, 1987; Hibberd, in width extending from the endocarp to the mesocarp, without apparent expression 1981; Smith et al., 1996, 1997, 1998; Villalon, in the cuticle. Chile pepper has been significantly affected by stip for the past several 1975), however, observed by the author as decades leading to varying degrees of commercial losses. Due to the sporadic and between 5 and 15 mm in southern New seemingly spontaneous nature of the disorder, prolonged research interest has not been Mexico, that extend throughout the exocarp sustained. This review provides the reader a comprehensive synthesis of all available and mesocarp (Fig. 1). literature regarding this physiological disorder. Especially because research into this Lesions may also have a soft to dry texture disorder is scarce, it is essential that any and all previous research be made available (Villalon, 1975). The severity (number of together in one document to interested scientists, breeders, and growers. To achieve this lesions per symptomatic pod) may vary be- goal, all available stip-related publications were obtained and analyzed; additionally, tween 1 and 30 (Eijsinga et al., 1973; Feigin and searches were performed using all names associated with the disorder. The literature Sagiv, 1987; Hibberd, 1981; Smith et al., 1996, suggests that stip manifestation is a consequence of an interaction between a genetic 1997, 1998; Villalon, 1975). Except for these component (open-pollinated cultivars being more susceptible to symptom expression lesions, the vegetative and reproductive por- than hybrids) and an environmental component (increased nitrogen application, tions of plants appear normal (Villalon, 1975). shading, and soil applications of lime appear to increase both severity and incidence). Description of Symptom Manifestation The terms ‘‘stip’’ (Smith et al., 1996, 1997, 1996, 1997, 1998; Stolk and Maaswinkel, 1977; Stip symptom development has been 1998), ‘‘black spot’’ (Villalon, 1975), ‘‘colour Uffelen, 1973, 1975; Villalon, 1975); however, observed in the greenhouse (Aloni et al., spots’’ (Aloni et al., 1994; Feigin and Sagiv, pimento, and New Mexican pod-type peppers 1994; Carroll, 1979; Eijsinga et al., 1973; 1987), ‘‘green spotting’’ (Carroll, 1979), ‘‘green have also been mentioned (Smith et al., 1995, Stolk and Maaswinkel, 1977) as well as under pitting’’ (Hibberd, 1981), ‘‘spotting’’ (Uffelen, 1996, 1997, 1998; Villalon, 1975; Table 1). field conditions (Feigin and Sagiv, 1987; 1973, 1975), ‘‘bitter pit’’ (Eijsinga et al., 1973), Previous studies have attempted to estab- Hibberd, 1981; Smith et al., 1996, 1997, and ‘‘pepper spot’’ (Stolk and Maaswinkel, lish that stip is not a consequence of any 1998; Villalon, 1975), and its severity and 1977) are different names that have been used known virus, bacterium, or fungus (Eijsinga incidence have been reported as variable from in the literature to describe what is likely the et al., 1973; Hibberd, 1981; Smith et al., year to year and therefore difficult to predict same physiological disorder of peppers. This 1996; Villalon, 1975), and no insect damage (Eijsinga et al., 1973; Smith et al., 1996, disorder, hereafter referred to as stip, was is reported in connection with this disorder 1997, 1998; Villalon, 1975). Although the independently described twice in the 1970s, (Eijsinga et al., 1973; Hibberd, 1981; Villalon, disorder has been reported as most pro- once in the Netherlands and once in Texas 1975). Consequently, symptoms are believed nounced when pods are fully mature and (Eijsinga et al., 1973; Villalon, 1975). Stip to be a manifestation of a physiological dis- red in color (Feigin and Sagiv, 1987; Hibberd, symptoms have been described most exten- order (Aloni et al., 1994; Carroll, 1979; 1981; Smith et al., 1996, 1997, 1998), the sively in bell peppers (Aloni et al., 1994; Eijsinga et al., 1973; Feigin and Sagiv, 1987; disorder has also been noted when pods are Carroll, 1979; Eijsinga et al., 1973; Feigin Hibberd, 1981; Smith et al., 1996, 1997; Stolk mature green, with symptoms becoming and Sagiv, 1987; Hibberd, 1981; Smith et al., and Maaswinkel, 1977; Uffelen, 1973, 1975; more apparent as they mature further (Aloni Villalon, 1975). The disorder has been spo- et al., 1994; Villalon, 1975). Consequently, radically reported in geographically distant symptoms are most often noted during har- Received for publication 5 July 2016. Accepted for academic journals over the past 40 years, vest in the late summer and early fall publication 12 Oct. 2016. likely because it presents as a problem in transition period oftentimes occurring when Funding for this research was provided by the New a given production area for brief, and appar- nights are cool, daylength is shorter, and Mexico Chile Association. Additional salaries and ently random times. As a result, there has not dews are heavy for fall harvested peppers research support were provided by state and federal been sustained and focused attention on study- (Aloni et al., 1994; Eijsinga et al., 1973; funds appropriated to the New Mexico Agricultural ing the condition. Therefore, a comprehensive Experiment Station. Feigin and Sagiv, 1987; Hibberd, 1981; 1Graduate Research Assistant. review that consolidates the information gen- Smith et al., 1996, 1997, 1998; Villalon, 2Assistant Professor. erated through these spatially and temporally 1975; Wien and Zitter, 2003). Increased 3Corresponding author. E-mail: mark.uchanski@ disparate studies can be useful to describe, symptom severity and incidence have been colostate.edu. synthesize, and present previous research described during the middle portion of 4 HORTSCIENCE VOL. 52(1) JANUARY 2017 REVIEW Table 1. A summary of the published literature referencing the physiological disorder known as stip in peppers, arranged alphabetically by author. Author (yr) Location Pod type, cultivar Environment Fruit stage Analysis type Aloni et al. (1994) Israel Bell; Maor, Lady Bell, and 899 Greenhouse Mature red V (N, K, Ca, photosynthesis); (increasing in resistance) R (N, K, Ca, Mg, oxalic acid, yield, severity) Carroll (1979) Australia Bell; California Wonder Greenhouse NA R (incidence, Ca, B, yield) Eijsinga et al. (1973) Netherlands Bell Greenhouse Mature red R (Na, K, Ca, Mg, P, Cl, N, NO3-N, S, SO4-S, Mn, Fe, Al, B); soil components affecting manifestation Feigin and Israel Bell; Maor Field Mature red V (N); R (N, incidence/severity) Sagiv (1987) Hibberd (1981) Australia Bell; Sheba, Yolo Y, Midway, Field Mature red R (yield, incidence/severity) Early Bountiful, Allbig, Green Giant, Super Set, Jade, Yolo Wonder, California Wonder, Miss Belle Mullen et al. (2000) California Bell; Emerald Isle, Grande Rio, Field NA R (incidence, yield) Bigga-Pep, Early Sunsation, HA-65, P33F1 Smith et al. (1995) California Bell; Galaxy, King Arthur (R), Field Mature red V (N, K, Ca); R (N, K, Ca, Yolo Wonder L, Grande Rio (S) incidence/severity) Smith et al., (1996) California Bell; Galaxy, King Arthur, Field Both V (N, K, Ca, Mg, Na, B); Grande Rio 66, Jupiter (S) R (N, K, Ca, Mg, Na, B, incidence/severity) Smith et al. (1997) California Bell; Grande Rio 66 (S) Field Mature red V (NO3-N, N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, Cl, B, Zn); R (N, P. K, Ca, Mg, Na, Cl, B, Zn) Smith et al. (1998) California Bell; Yolo Wonder A, Yolo Wonder B, Field Mature red V (N, K, Ca, Mg, Na); Jupiter, Keystone Resistant Giant, R (incidence/severity, yield) Grande Rio 66, Mercury, Pimlico, Loribelle, Cal Wonder 300 (R), Capistrano, Merced, Emerald Giant, Taurus, Gusto, D-13, Pip Smith et al. (1999) California Bell; Cal Wonder, Gusto, Greenhouse and Field Mature red R (incidence/severity) King Arthur, and Grande Rio Stolk and Netherlands Bell; Propa, Deltana, No. 40, Manto, Greenhouse Mature red R (yield, severity) Maaswinkel, 1977 Rumba, Bell Boy Uffelen (1973) Netherlands Bell Field Mature red R (Na, K, Ca, Mg, P, Cl, N, NO3-N, S, SO4-S, Mn, Fe, Al, B); soil components affecting manifestation Uffelen (1975) Netherlands Bell; No. 938, Bell Boy, Field Mature red R (incidence/severity, yield) Rumba, Deltana, Improved Glass, Sonette Villalon (1975) Texas Bell. Also mentions Anaheim Plants transplanted from Both Plant inoculation and (New Mexico pod type) field to greenhouse pathogen identification NA = not available.
Recommended publications
  • How to Recognize Plant Disorders Caused by Nonbiological Agents: a Guidebook
    DENR Recommends Volume 8 HOW TO RECOGNIZE PLANT DISORDERS CAUSED BY NONBIOLOGICAL AGENTS: A GUIDEBOOK by ERANEO B. LAPIS APOLINARIA T. CORNEJO MARCELINA V. PACHO Ecosystems Research and Development Bureau Department of Environment and Natural Resources College, Laguna 4031 Introduction Most forest tree seedlings are reared in nurseries before outplanting in the field. This is to produce healthy seedlings with compact fibrous roots and vigorous leaves that can withstand adverse conditions when transplanted. There are many practices done in the nursery. For example, seeds are treated or given appropriate treatments, i.e., scarification, chilling, boiling, etc., before sowing on prepared seedboxes/seedbeds. After a few weeks, seedlings are transplanted to individual pots and watered when necessary. Organic and inorganic fertilizers are applied after root establishment. Occasional weeding is done to devoid the plants of competition for soil nutrient. When grown on large scale, irrigation is practiced to enhance the effectiveness of fertilizers and herbicides that require moist soil. When insects and/or diseases are present, usually the seedlings are immediately sprayed with insecticides/fungicides with the hope of eliminating the pest/disease. The nursery man does this often as he thinks it is necessary. Despite rigorous care, plants still suffer from many disorders due to diseases caused by either nonbiological or biological factors. In many instances, these practices are the same factors that lead to plant abnormalities, which are noninfectious, especially when the nurseryman is careless or does not have sufficient knowledge on the occurrence and causal factors of noninfectious diseases. This handbook, therefore, serves as a guide for nurserymen in the proper identification and diagnoses of the causal factors of noninfectious diseases of seedlings in the nursery or young outplanted seedlings from where appropriate control and/or preventive measures against these diseases could be based.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 the Effects of Soil Properties on Plant Physiology Wayne Blizzard Department of Botany University of Illinois Urbana, Illinois 61801
    Chapter 2 The Effects of Soil Properties on Plant Physiology Wayne Blizzard Department of Botany University of Illinois Urbana, Illinois 61801 Wayne Blizzard received his B.S. degree in botany at the University of California-Davis and the M.S. degree in botany at the Uni- versity of Illinois-Urbana. He is presently Visiting Teaching As- sociate in the Department of Botany at the University of Illinois- Urbana. His professional interests include the development of in- structional media for science education, particularly the develop- ment of “practical science” materials for lay persons. 17 17 17 18 Soil Properties Introduction These exercises examine the physiological needs of plant roots and how the properties of soils, non-soil potting materials, and containers affect the physiology of plants. This project was developed for our college-level intro- ductory botany course for non-science majors “Botany 102: Plants, Environ- ment & Man”. It teaches scientific principles and the practical plant culturing skills that are derived from those principles. The project could be easily adapted for use in a high school biology course through a simplification of the principles (if needed) or by putting greater emphasis on skill learning. The project uses a variety of teaching methods: informal lecture, dem- onstrations, student activities and manual skills, visual displays with self- paced questions, class discussion, and take-home evaluation questions. Each method and activity is meant to cover one or more learning objectives (below), Class time is 50 minutes. Set-up is approximately four hours. The plants used in the exercise should be started five to seven weeks in advance.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacteria in Agrobiology: Stress Management
    Bacteria in Agrobiology: Stress Management Bearbeitet von Dinesh K. Maheshwari 1. Auflage 2012. Buch. XII, 333 S. Hardcover ISBN 978 3 642 23464 4 Format (B x L): 15,5 x 23,5 cm Gewicht: 684 g Weitere Fachgebiete > Chemie, Biowissenschaften, Agrarwissenschaften > Entwicklungsbiologie > Bakteriologie (nichtmedizinisch) Zu Inhaltsverzeichnis schnell und portofrei erhältlich bei Die Online-Fachbuchhandlung beck-shop.de ist spezialisiert auf Fachbücher, insbesondere Recht, Steuern und Wirtschaft. Im Sortiment finden Sie alle Medien (Bücher, Zeitschriften, CDs, eBooks, etc.) aller Verlage. Ergänzt wird das Programm durch Services wie Neuerscheinungsdienst oder Zusammenstellungen von Büchern zu Sonderpreisen. Der Shop führt mehr als 8 Millionen Produkte. Chapter 2 The Management of Soil Quality and Plant Productivity in Stressed Environment with Rhizobacteria Dilfuza Egamberdieva 2.1 Introduction The urgency of feeding the world’s growing population while combating soil pollution, salinization, and desertification has given plant and soil productivity research vital importance. Under such circumstances, it requires suitable biotech- nology not only to improve crop productivity but also to improve soil health through interactions of plant roots and soil microorganisms (Lugtenberg et al. 2002). Interest in bacterial fertilizers has increased, as it would substantially reduce the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides which often contribute to the pollution of soil–water ecosystems. Presently, about 20 biocontrol products based on Pseu- domonas, Bacillus, Streptomyces, and Agrobacterium strains have been commercialized, but there still is a need to improve the efficacy of these biocontrol products (Copping 2004; Chebotar et al. 2000; Lugtenberg and Kamilova 2004). Soil salinity disturbs the plant–microbe interaction, which is a critical ecological factor to help further plant growth in degraded ecosystems (Paul and Nair 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • How to Make Your Own Potting Soil
    Genesee County Master Gardener Newsletter DOWN TO EARTH 2016 Inside this issue: FEATURE ARTICLE 1 HOME GROWN 3 COOKS CORNER 4 FEATURE ARTICLE MASTER GARDENER 7 ASSOCIATION MEET- How to Make Your Own Potting FALL INTO SPRING 6 Soil MEETING MINUTES 7 RECOGNITION 8 Packaged potting soils are a terrific convenience, but their cost adds up fast in a busy garden. Last year, I paid $7 per 22-quart HOW TO MAKE A 9 NIGHTCRAWL- bag for my favorite, McEnroe Organic, is a fair price but neverthe- ERWORM FARM less dollars out the door. Making only about half of the potting soil I used saved me around $60. Next year, when my pile of rotting EL NIÑO EFFECTS IN 11 sawdust matures, I hope to be potting soil self-sufficient. OUR AREA Potting soil self-sufficiency is good for your pocketbook, your plants DATES TO REMEM- 12 and the planet, and you actually gain convenience by always hav- BER ing potting soil ready when you need it. If you have soil and com- MGAGCM OFFICERS 13 post, you’ve got the basic ingredients for making your own potting soil. In place of peat moss, perlite and vermiculite (the three lead- MSU Extension—Genesee County ing ingredients in bagged potting soil), you can simply combine is an education agency funded jointly by Genesee County through your best soil with cured compost, leaf mold, rotted sawdust (from the Board of Commissioners, by untreated wood) or a long list of other organic ingredients. Prepare the state through Michigan State some small batches, mix it with store-bought stuff to stretch your University, and federally through the United States Department of supply, and gradually make the transition to what potting soil Agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • BASIC PLANT STRUCTURE Forms of Plant Stress
    ISSUE 30 2015 MAGAZINE FOR SERIOUS GROWERS BASIC PLANT STRUCTURE Forms of plant stress GARROOF DENING Veggies from the roof GARLIC CHIVES Wonderful edible flowers And more: Don & Nicky Factographic P Pests & Diseases Puzzle & Win Grower’s Tip Questions & Answers Foreword Let’s geek out... Oh no.... it’s that time of the year again! Summer is behind us and when we look ahead, we can see the HQautumn and winter approaching.Talk: It is always nicer to look forward to some nice weather than the cold, the easy way. dark days of winter. But to give us a better feeling let’s just focus on the great summer we had. A summer full of joy! CANNA was present at Boardmasters where the best BMXers and Skaters showed off their most amazing tricks on the CANNA Midi Ramp and where you could relax and enjoy the lovely views of Monitor, data log, control and remotely view pH, conductivity Watergate Bay. What a great time we all had down on the Cornish coast. But now it’s back to business again as we have been preparing a lot this summer.... and temperature. Especially for you, the CANNA Researchers woke up early in order to handle the heat in the greenhouses and finish writing all their articles in time. They might have suffered a little pre-deadline stress but did Fast, wireless data straight from the grow site to your PC, with the you know a plant can also suffer from different forms of stress and physiological disorders? Yes, it’s true! option for mobile device access.
    [Show full text]
  • AAPFCO Product Label Guide
    AAPFCO Product Label Guide Association of American Plant Food Control Officials 2019 www.aapfco.org Table of Contents List of Figures………………………………………………………………………………………….………………....i Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Label Defined .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Fertilizers ................................................................................................................................................. 2 General Requirements .................................................................................................................... 2 Types of Fertilizers ........................................................................................................................... 2 Basic Label Components ................................................................................................................. 3 Brand ................................................................................................................................................................3 Grade.................................................................................................................................................................3 Guaranteed Analysis ...................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • CATEGORIES Tec-7415 Formulations LLC) Cuf-5832 Crop Products Agrinos B Sure 0.5-0-0.5 (Agrinos Inc.) Agz- Biofusion Nitro-Fusion Organic Macros 10519 (Biofusion, S.A
    OMRI has determined the following products Pro-Pell-It! Alfalfa Meal Non-Pelletized AMINOVA 65 Fertilizante Orgánico / Polvo are allowed for use in accordance with Fertilizer 2.5-0-2.5 (Marion Ag Service, Inc.) (Zare Agrhos) zar-4368 National Organic Program (NOP) standards, mas-10028 ArgiLife 72 - Organic Fertilizer Input Based for the use indicated and in keeping with any TRUE Organic Products, Inc True Alfalfa on Hydrolyzed Proteins, Arginine Glutamine applicable use with their USDA-accredited Meal (True Organic Products, Inc.) top-8991 Peptides (Suboneyo Chemicals & certifying body before using any new Pharmaceuticals P. Limited) scp-6474 products. Updated May 9, 2019. Amino Acids B Sure (Agrinos Inc.) agz-10520 AgriBest VitaFull Best Regulador de BenVireo Botanic Dry 16-0-0 (Wilbur-Ellis crecimiento y vigorizante vegetal Líquido Company, LLC) wec-12056 Soluble (Tecnologías Agribest, S.A. de C.V.) Bio Beast Plant Nitrogen 13-0-0 (Custom CATEGORIES tec-7415 Formulations LLC) cuf-5832 Crop Products Agrinos B Sure 0.5-0-0.5 (Agrinos Inc.) agz- BioFusion Nitro-Fusion Organic Macros 10519 (Biofusion, S.A. de C.V.) bif-10866 Agrinos B Sure 0.5-0-0.5 Liquid Concentrate BioLife HN14 Organic Nitrogen 14-0-0 Crop Fertilizers and Soil (Agrinos S.A. de C.V. (aka Bioderpac S.A. de Organic Nitrogen Fertilizer Based on Amendments C.V.)) agh-6434 Hydrolyzed Proteins (Suboneyo Chemicals & Agrinos B Sure Liquid Concentrate (Agrinos Pharmaceuticals P. Limited) scp-3869 Activated Charcoal S.A. de C.V. (aka Bioderpac S.A. de C.V.)) BioLife S80 Organic Nitrogen Fertilizer agh-6544 Based on Hydrolyzed Proteins, Amino Acids Black Owl Biochar Environmental Ultra Agrinos HYTb 0.5-0-0.5 Liquid Concentrate (Suboneyo Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals P.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Microbiome Manipulation Gives New Insights in Plant Disease-Suppressive Soils from the Perspective of a Circular Economy: a Critical Review
    sustainability Review Soil Microbiome Manipulation Gives New Insights in Plant Disease-Suppressive Soils from the Perspective of a Circular Economy: A Critical Review Ugo De Corato Department of Bioenergy, Biorefinery and Green Chemistry (TERIN-BBC-BIC), Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), 70124 Bari, Italy; [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0831-201-616 Abstract: This review pays attention to the newest insights on the soil microbiome in plant disease- suppressive soil (DSS) for sustainable plant health management from the perspective of a circular economy that provides beneficial microbiota by recycling agro-wastes into the soil. In order to increase suppression of soil-borne plant pathogens, the main goal of this paper is to critically discuss and compare the potential use of reshaped soil microbiomes by assembling different agricultural practices such as crop selection; land use and conservative agriculture; crop rotation, diversifica- tion, intercropping and cover cropping; compost and chitosan application; and soil pre-fumigation combined with organic amendments and bio-organic fertilizers. This review is seen mostly as a comprehensive understanding of the main findings regarding DSS, starting from the oldest concepts to the newest challenges, based on the assumption that sustainability for soil quality and plant health is increasingly viable and supported by microbiome-assisted strategies based on the next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods that characterize in depth the soil bacterial and fungal communities. This approach, together with the virtuous reuse of agro-wastes to produce in situ green composts and organic bio-fertilizers, is the best way to design new sustainable cropping systems in a circular economy system.
    [Show full text]
  • Crop Fertilizers and Soil Amendments
    OMRI Products List, Web Edition Crop Products Crop Fertilizers and Amino Acids – nonsynthetic Anaerobic Digestate – from HYTB BioAmin Regulador de manure feedstock Soil Amendments crecimiento no sintético Products of anaerobic digestion produced Concentrado Líquido (Bioderpac with manure feedstocks are subject to the Activated Charcoal S.A. de C.V.) same restrictions as raw, uncomposted manure. They may only be (i) applied to ψ Vertro Biochar (Vertrolysis, LLC) PHL (Dadelos, SL) land used for a crop not intended for Black Owl™ 100% Pure & Taba (Kan biosys Pvt. Ltd) human consumption; (ii) incorporated into Natural Biochar (Biochar the soil not less than 120 days prior to the AMINOVA 65 Compuesto de Supreme, LLC) harvest of a product whose edible portion Aminoácidos (Zare Agrhos) has direct contact with the soil surface or Alfalfa Meal or Pellets Biodiversity Organic Nitrogen 12- soil particles; or (iii) incorporated into the 0-0 (BioDiversity Products Inc) soil not less than 90 days prior to the Down to Earth Alfalfa Meal 2.5- harvest of a product whose edible portion 0.5-2.5 (Down To Earth BioLife S80 Organic Nitrogen does not have direct contact with the soil Distributors, Inc.) Fertilizer Based on Hydrolyzed surface or soil particles. Proteins, Amino Acids (Suboneyo Magic Dirt Organic Garden and Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals P. Potting Mix (Cenergy USA, Inc.) Limited) BioPro S81 Organic Nitrogen Animal By-products and Fertilizer based on Hydrolyzed Materials Proteins, Amino Acids (Suboneyo Foster Farms Protein Meal 8-1-0 Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals P. (Foster Farms) Limited) Healthy Plant Shrimp Shell All Ferti-Organic Ferti-Nitro Plus Purpose Organic Fertilizer Plant Nitrogen 13.62-0-0 (Ferti- (Healthy Plant, LLC) Organic, Inc.) Pacific Gro® Shrimp Meal GroGreenIt™ Nitro Solutions (Pacific Gro, LLC) (Natural Solutions, Inc.) Grower's Secret Nitrogen for Organic Production Grower's Secret Nitrogen 12-0-0 (Grower's Secret, Inc.) Gruindag Organoamin (Gruindag International, S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Make Your Own Potting Soil You Can Save Money by Using Your Own Soil and Compost to Make Potting Mixes Your Plants Will Love
    Homemade Potting Soil (Heavily edited from - How to Make Your Own Potting Soil You can save money by using your own soil and compost to make potting mixes your plants will love. By Barbara Pleasant December 2008/January 2009 http://www.motherearthnews.com/Organic-Gardening/How-To-Make- Your-Own-Potting-Soil.aspx ) Packaged potting soils are a terrific convenience, but their cost adds up fast in a busy garden. Last year, I paid $7 per 22-quart bag for my favorite, McEnroe Organic, a fair price but is nevertheless dollars out the door. Making only about half of the potting soil I used saved me around $60. Next year, when my pile of rotting sawdust matures, I hope to be potting-soil self-sufficient. Potting soil self-sufficiency is good for your pocketbook, your plants and the planet, and you actually gain convenience by always having potting soil ready when you need it. If you have soil and compost, you’ve got the basic ingredients for making your own potting soil. In place of peat moss, perlite and vermiculite (the three leading ingredients in bagged potting soil), you can simply combine your best soil with cured compost, leaf mold, rotted sawdust (from untreated wood) or a long list of other organic ingredients. Using live compost or biologically active garden soil in your potting mixes often requires two extra steps - screening and then heat-treating or pasteurizing the material at 160 degrees to 180 degrees Fahrenheit. I like to use the compost made from garden waste to make potting soil, so whenever a batch looks good, I screen some and put it in plastic pails, bins or bags (such as those saved from purchased potting soil).
    [Show full text]
  • SOIL and HOW to TREAT IT John Cooper Denton County Extension Horticulturist [email protected] the Soil Teems with Life the Gene
    SOIL AND HOW TO TREAT IT John Cooper Denton County Extension Horticulturist [email protected] The Soil Teems With Life The general health of any plant depends in great measure on the soil environment. After all, half the plant is underground. Besides serving as an anchoring medium in which the plant can stand up, the soil serves as a vast reservoir of water, oxygen and minerals. The soil is teeming with roots, microbes, insects and earthworms in dynamic interaction with considerable effects on soil fertility and plant growth. A single grass plant may produce 375 miles of roots consisting of almost 14 million individual roots with a combined exposed root surface area of 2,500 square feet. Plant roots continually grow and mine the soil for available water and nutrients. As roots explore the soil, they perforate the soil extensively and most eventually die, leaving a fine network of organic matter throughout the soil profile which tiny microbes use for food. The microbes, in turn, die and release the digested minerals back to the soil for use by plants. Better managed lawns and sports turf soils typically contain more than 900 billion microbes for each pound of soil within the root zone. This equals 70 pounds of microbes in each 1000 square feet of soil six inches deep. As these microbes die, they return about 7 pounds of nitrogen, 3.5 pounds of phosphorus, 1.4 pounds of potassium and lesser amounts of other essential elements. Ants, nematodes, mites, spiders and other macro-organisms inhabiting the soil are less populous than soil microbes but are just as important.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydroponics Systems and Principles of Plant Nutrition: Essential Nutrients, Function, Deficiency, and Excess
    Hydroponics Systems and Principles Of Plant Nutrition: Essential Nutrients, Function, Deficiency, and Excess Before beginning the discussion of the Essential nutrients can be broadly categorized as principles of plant nutrient systems in macronutrients and micronutrients. Macronutrients and hydroponic systems, we need to define what we micronutrients are both essential for plant growth and mean by 'hydroponic'. development. Macronutrients include carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, sulfur, calcium, and magnesium. Micronutrients include iron, manganese, zinc, boron, molybdenum, chlorine, copper, and nickel. The difference between macro- and micronutrients is the amount required by plants. Macronutrients are required in higher amounts than micronutrients. Table 1 shows the approximate plant content of essential nutrients. Plants get carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen from air and water. The rest of the nutrients are from soil or in the case of hydroponics from nutrient solutions or aggregate media. Sources of nutrients available to plants are listed in Table 1. Table 1. Approximate content in plants, roles in plants, and source available to plants of essential plant nutrients. Photo 1. Hydroponic system using a soilless media to grow Source of tomatoes in bags. Photo: Tom Ford, Penn State Nutrient Approximate nutrient (chemical content of plant available Hydroponic can be defined as growing plants in water symbol) (% dry weight) Roles in plant to plant containing nutrients. Examples of this type of hydroponic Carbon systems includes NFT (nutrient film technique) systems and Carbon (C), dioxide deep-water float systems where plant roots are set in nutrient hydrogen Components of (CO ) and solutions. Another definition of hydroponic is growing plants 2 (H), oxygen organic water (H without soil.
    [Show full text]