Quantum Hall Effect

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Quantum Hall Effect ——————————————————————————————— A Different Kind of Quantization: The Quantum Hall Effect The quantum Hall effect is one of the most remarkable of all condensed-matter phenomena, quite unanticipated by the physics community at the time of its discovery in 1980 [2]. The basic experimental observation is the quantization of resistance, in two-dimensional systems, to an extreme precision, irrespective of the sample’s shape and of its degree of purity. This intriguing phenomenon is a manifestation of quantum mechanics on a macroscopic scale, and for that reason, it rivals superconductivity and Bose–Einstein condensation in its fundamental importance. 0 Magnetic Field FIG. 1: The basic setup of Edwin Hall’s 1878 experiment. The graph on the right shows that Hall resistance increases linearly with the magnetic field. I. WHAT IS THE HALL EFFECT? CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM ANSWERS The classical Hall effect was named after Edwin Hall, who, as a 24-year-old physics graduate student at Johns Hopkins University, discovered the effect in 1878. His measurement of this tiny 1 effect is regarded as an experimental tour de force, preceding by 18 years the discovery of the electron. The classical Hall effect offered the first real proof that electric currents in metals are carried by moving charged particles. As is shown in Figure 1, the basic setup of Hall’s experiment consists of a very thin sheet of conducting material, which is subjected to both an electric field E~ and a magnetic field B~ . The electric field, lying in the plane of the conductor, makes the charges in the conductor move, setting up an electric current I. The magnetic field, on the other hand, is perpendicular to the conductor, and according to the classical laws of electricity and magnetism, it exerts a so-called Lorentz force on these moving charges, pushing them sideways in the plane, perpendicular to the current I. This results in an induced voltage, perpendicular to both I and B, which is known as the Hall voltage. The Hall resistance, usually denoted by Rxy, is deduced from Ohm’s law, V = IR, so it equals the ratio of the transverse Hall voltage to the longitudinal current I. The Hall conductance, which is the reciprocal of the Hall resistance, is denoted by σxy. Just over a century later, in 1980, a quantum-mechanical generalization of Edwin Hall’s classical effect was discovered by German physicist Klaus von Klitzing. What today is called the “integer quantum Hall effect” took the physics world deeply by surprise. Von Klitzing was investigating the transport properties of a certain semiconductor device (namely, a silicon MOSFET, short for “metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor”) at very low temperatures and in high magnetic fields. His experiment revealed two novel features closely related to, but quite distinct from, what Hall had found (which was a purely linear increase in Hall resistivity with the magnetic field). These features were: • Plateaus — that is, step-like structure — in Hall resistance (or conversely, plateaus in Hall conductivity, since conductance is the reciprocal of resistance), as can be seen in Figure 2. • Not just plateaus, but quantization of resistivity, meaning that the Hall resistivity assumes periodically spaced values — namely, integer multiples of a new fundamental constant e2 σH = h (where e is the charge on the electron and h, as always, is Planck’s constant). This very surprising discovery earned von Klitzing the Nobel Prize in physics in 1985. Appendix A contains some excerpts from the announcement of the Nobel Prize [1]. The quantum Hall effect arises in two-dimensional electronic systems, commonly known as two-dimensional electron gases, which are immersed in a strong magnetic field. There are a variety 2 FIG. 2: On the left, German physicist Klaus Klitzing and the discovery of the quantum Hall effect. On the right, the integer quantum Hall effect, characterized by quantized plateaus of resistance. More specifically, the resistivity of the material assumes only values that are integer multiples of the fundamental physical e2 constant h . of techniques to construct two-dimensional electron gases. Von Klitzing’s 1980 discovery relied on the existence of a two-dimensional electron gas in a semiconducting device. By the middle of the 1960s, such systems could be physically realized, thanks to the great technological progress that followed the invention of the transistor roughly twenty years earlier. Figure 3 schematically shows an example of a two-dimensional electron gas, in which the energy bands in a gallium-arsenide/aluminum-arsenide alloy are used to create a quantum well. Electrons from a silicon donor layer fall into the quantum well to create the electron gas. 3 FIG. 3: Schematic illustration of a rectangularly-shaped quantum well in a semiconductor, which becomes the home for a two-dimensional electron gas. The horizontal axis represents an ordinary coordinate of physical position, while the vertical axis represents energy. (To create the energy barriers that define the well, it is common to use an alloy of gallium arsenide and aluminum arsenide, as is shown in this figure, rather than pure aluminum arsenide.) The two dark circles represent positive silicon ions that have donated electrons to the quantum well. (Of course the gas consists of millions of electrons, not just two.) The wave function of the lowest energy level for an electron caught in the quantum well is indicated by the dashed line. II. A CHARGED PARTICLE IN A MAGNETIC FIELD: CYCLOTRON ORBITS AND THEIR QUANTIZATION A. Classical Picture We open our explanation of the quantum Hall effect by giving a purely classical description of the motion of an electron with charge −e in the presence of a uniform magnetic field B~ , which we will assume is directed along the z-axis. If the electron has velocity ~v, it will experience a Lorentz force −e~v × B~ due to the magnetic field, and its motion will be described by Newton’s equation F~ = m~a, broken down into x- and y-coordinates, as follows: 4 mx¨ = −eBy_ (1) my¨ = +eBx_ (2) The general solution to these coupled differential equations is periodic motion in a circle of arbitrary radius R: ~r = R(cos(!t + δ); sin(!t + δ)) (3) eB Here, ! = m is known as the classical cyclotron frequency, and δ is an arbitrary phase associated with the motion. Note that the period of the orbit is independent of the radius. In fact, the radius R and the tangential speed v = R! are proportional to each other, with constant of proportionality !. Thus a fast particle will travel in a large circle and will return to its starting point at exactly the same moment as a slow particle traveling in a small circle. Such motion is said to be isochronous, much like that of a harmonic oscillator (e.g., a pendulum with small amplitude), whose period is independent of the amplitude of the oscillation. B. Quantum Picture To treat the problem quantum-mechanically, we must solve the corresponding Schrodinger¨ equation, and, as in the case of the hydrogen atom, we find that this yields a quantized set of electron energies: 1 eB E = !(n + );! = (4) n ~ 2 m where n = 1; 2; 3; :::. These quantized energy levels are known as Landau levels, and the corresponding wave functions as Landau states, after the Russian physicist Lev Landau, who pioneered the quantum-mechanical study of electrons in magnetic fields. The Landau wave functions are products of Gaussian functions (bell-shaped curves) and certain polynomials called Hermite polynomials. Without going into detail, we will simply state 5 FIG. 4: The quantization of electron orbits in a magnetic field results in equally-spaced energy levels — eB Landau levels. The spacing of these levels is proportional to the classical cyclotron frequency ! = m . The colorful drawing on the right shows many electrons simultaneously executing cyclotron orbits, where each colored plane in the stack represents a different Landau level. that these wave functions describe waves that spread out over a characteristic distance known as the magnetic length lB: r l = ~ (5) B eB The existence of both a natural length scale lB and a natural energy scale ~! in this physical situation is a purely quantum phenomenon (as can be seen from the presence of ~ in the formulas for both of these natural units). In the classical situation, there was no such natural unit of length. 6 Note that the new length scale is nonetheless closely related to the classical cyclotron frequency eB of an electron in a magnetic field, m . Associated with the natural quantum-mechanical magnetic length lB is a natural quantum-mechanical unit of area: h=e 2πl2 = (6) B B This formula reveals a natural physical interpretation for the magnetic length, which is that the area 2 h that it determines — namely, 2πlB — intercepts exactly one quantum of magnetic flux, Φ0 = e . We can thus write: Φ 2πl2 = 0 (7) B B Furthermore, it can be shown that each Landau level is highly degenerate, with the degeneracy factor ν being given by the total number of flux quanta penetrating the sample of area A, BA h ν = ; Φ0 = (8) Φ0 e The model we have just discussed allows one to understand the quantization of Hall conductivity, as is shown in Appendix C. The crux of the matter is that if a Landau level (with ν quantum states) is completely filled, the Hall conductance is quantized. Furthermore, the quantum number associated with Hall conductivity is determined by the number N of filled Landau levels. Thus if the Fermi energy lies in the N th gap, then the transverse or Hall conductivity is: e2 σ = N (9) xy h Since the Fermi energy resides in a gap between bands (see Figure 5), quantum Hall systems are insulators, and yet, strangely enough, they exhibit Hall conductivity.
Recommended publications
  • Harvard University Department of Physics Newsletter
    Harvard University Department of Physics Newsletter FALL 2014 COVER STORY Probing the Universe’s Earliest Moments FOCUS Early History of the Physics Department FEATURED Quantum Optics Where Physics Meets Biology Condensed Matter Physics NEWS A Reunion Across Generations and Disciplines 42475.indd 1 10/30/14 9:19 AM Detecting this signal is one of the most important goals in cosmology today. A lot of work by a lot of people has led to this point. JOHN KOVAC, HARVARD-SMITHSONIAN CENTER FOR ASTROPHYSICS LEADER OF THE BICEP2 COLLABORATION 42475.indd 2 10/24/14 12:38 PM CONTENTS ON THE COVER: Letter from the former Chair ........................................................................................................ 2 The BICEP2 telescope at Physics Department Highlights 4 twilight, which occurs only ........................................................................................................ twice a year at the South Pole. The MAPO observatory (home of the Keck Array COVER STORY telescope) and the South Pole Probing the Universe’s Earliest Moments ................................................................................. 8 station can be seen in the background. (Steffen Richter, Harvard University) FOCUS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Early History of the Physics Department ................................................................................ 12 AND CREDITS: Newsletter Committee: FEATURED Professor Melissa Franklin Professor Gerald Holton Quantum Optics ..............................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • A Topological Look at the Quantum Hall Effect
    A Topological Look at the Quantum Hall Effect The amazingly precise quantization of Hall conductance in a two-dimensional electron gas can be understood in terms of a topological invariant known as the Chern number. Joseph E. Avron, Daniel Osadchy, and Ruedi Seiler The story of the Hall effect begins with a mistake made by James Clerk Maxwell. In the first edition of his Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, which appeared in 1873, Maxwell discussed the deflection of a current by a magnetic field. He then said: "It must be carefully remembered that the mechanical force which urges a conductor . acts, not on the electric current, but on the conductor which carries it." If readers are puzzled by this assertion, they should be. In 1878, Edwin Hall, a student at Johns Hopkins University, was reading Maxwell for a class taught by Henry Rowland. Hall asked Rowland about Maxwell's remark. The professor replied that he "doubted the truth of Maxwell's statement and had sometime before made a hasty experiment . though without success."1 Hall made a fresh start and designed a different experiment, aimed at measuring, instead, the magnetoresistance--that is, the change of the electrical resistance due to the magnetic field. As we now know, that is a much harder experiment, and it too failed. Maxwell appeared to be safe. Hall then decided to repeat Rowland's experiment. Following his mentor's suggestion, Hall replaced the original metal conducting bar with a thin gold leaf, to compensate for the weakness of the available magnetic field. That did the trick.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of a World-Class Research Project Accomplished in China Lessons for China's Science Policy
    Zhzh SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND PUBLIC POLICY PROGRAM A Case Study of a World-Class Research Project Accomplished in China Lessons for China's Science Policy Junling Huang Dongbo Shi Lan Xue Venkatesh Narayanamurti DISCUSSION PAPER 2017-02 FEBRUARY 2017 Science, Technology, and Public Policy Program Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 www.belfercenter.org/STPP Belfer Center Discussion Paper 2017-02 Statements and views expressed in this report are solely those of the authors and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, the Harvard Kennedy School, or the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Design & Layout by Andrew Facini Cover photo: A view of the Institute of Physics at the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing's Haidian District, September 29, 2016. Copyright DigitalGlobe, used with permission. Copyright 2017, President and Fellows of Harvard College Printed in the United States of America SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND PUBLIC POLICY PROGRAM A Case Study of a World-Class Research Project Accomplished in China Lessons for China's Science Policy Junling Huang 1, 2 Dongbo Shi 1, 3, 4 Lan Xue 3 Venkatesh Narayanamurti 1, 2, * 1 Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. 2 John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. 3 School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, PR China. 4 School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, PR China * Corresponding author. DISCUSSION PAPER 2017-02 FEBRUARY 2017 Acknowledgments Junling Huang and V.
    [Show full text]
  • December 1998 the American Physical Society Volume 7, No
    A P S N E W S DECEMBER 1998 THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 7, NO. 11 APS News[Try the enhanced APS News-online: [http://www.aps.org/apsnews] APS Centennial 33 March 20-26, 1999 Months to Go www.aps.org/centennial George Trilling Elected APS Vice-President embers of The American Physical The 1999 president is Jerome Friedman Trefil of George Mason University. experimental particle physics, and has in- M Society have elected George H. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Several minor amendments to the APS cluded studies of hadron interactions and Trilling, a professor emeritus at University [Look for our annual interview with the Constitution were also approved by the resonances, electron-positron annihilation of California, Berkeley and senior faculty incoming APS president in the January membership in order to permit electronic at high energy, and colliding beam experi- physicist at Lawrence Berkeley National 1999 APS News.] ballots in future membership-wide elec- ments and detectors. Within the APS, Laboratory, to be the Society’s next vice- In other election results, Michael S. tions and proposed Constitutional Trilling served on the Physics Planning president. Trilling’s term begins on 1 Turner of the University of Chicago and amendments. The Society hopes that elec- Committee and as Chair of the Division of January 1999, when he will succeed James Fermilab was elected chair-elect of the APS tronic balloting will increase voter Particles and Fields. He is presently a DPF Langer (University of California, Santa Nominating Committee, which will be participation, lower expenses, and reduce Divisional Councillor. Barbara), who will become president-elect.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hall Effect and Its .Applications the Hall Effect and Its .Applications
    The Hall Effect and Its .Applications The Hall Effect and Its .Applications Edited by C.L.Chien and C. R .Westgate The Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland Springer Science+Business Media, LLC Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Symposium on Hali Effect and lts Applications, Johns Hopkins University, 1979. The Hali effcct and its applica tions. Inc1udcs index. 1. Hali cffect-Congresses. 1. Chien, Chia Ling. II. Westgate, C.R. III. Title. QC612.H3S97 1979 537.6'22 80-18566 ISBN 978-1-4757-1369-5 ISBN 978-1-4757-1367-1 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-1367-1 Proceedings of the Commemorative Symposium on the Hali Effect and its Applications, held at The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, November 13, 1979. © 1980 Springer Science+Business Media New York Origina11y published by Plenum Press, New York in 1980 Ali righ ts reserved No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any [orm or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording, Of otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher PREFACE In 1879, while a graduate student under Henry Rowland at the Physics Department of The Johns Hopkins University, Edwin Herbert Hall discovered what is now universally known as the Hall effect. A symposium was held at The Johns Hopkins University on November 13, 1979 to commemorate the lOOth anniversary of the discovery. Over 170 participants attended the symposium which included eleven in­ vited lectures and three speeches during the luncheon. During the past one hundred years, we have witnessed ever ex­ panding activities in the field of the Hall effect.
    [Show full text]