DOCSLIB.ORG

Barr Hammock Preserve Management Plan Approved May 8, 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Barr Hammock Preserve Management Plan Approved May 8, 2012 Barr Hammock Preserve Management Plan Approved May 8, 2012 Alachua County Environmental Protection Department 408 West University Avenue, Suite 106 Gainesville, FL 32601 Barr Hammock / Ledwith Prairie / Levy Prairie Management Plan FCT Project #06-110-FF6 and #07-114-FF7 Submitted By: Alachua County Environmental Protection Department 408 West University Avenue, Suite 106 Gainesville, FL 32601 Original Plan adopted by Alachua County Board of County Commissioners, April 10, 2007 Original Plan approved by Florida Communities Trust April 17, 2007 This Plan Update Approved by the Alachua County Board of County Commissioners, May 8, 2012 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Management Plan Summary .......................................................................................................... iii I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 LOCATION & ADJACENT USES....................................................................................... 1 ACQUISITION HISTORY ................................................................................................... 1 NATURAL RESOURCES SUMMARY ............................................................................... 2 PREVIOUS USES ................................................................................................................. 2 RECREATION ...................................................................................................................... 3 II. PURPOSE .................................................................................................................................. 3 PRIORTIZED MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES .................................................................. 4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY ...................................................................... 4 LAND USE AND ZONING .................................................................................................. 5 III. NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES ....................................................................... 5 SOILS .................................................................................................................................... 5 HYDROLOGY AND GEOLOGY ........................................................................................ 6 NATURAL AND ALTERED COMMUNITIES .................................................................. 8 INVASIVE EXOTIC PLANTS ........................................................................................... 18 RESTORATION .................................................................................................................. 21 PRESCRIBED FIRE ............................................................................................................ 25 FERAL ANIMAL PROGRAM ........................................................................................... 28 LISTED SPECIES ............................................................................................................... 28 INVENTORY OF NATURAL COMMUNITIES AND BIOTA ........................................ 31 CULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................ 31 IV. FOREST RESOURCES ......................................................................................................... 33 V. SITE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPROVEMENT ................................................................... 35 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT SIGN ......................................................................................... 35 EXISTING PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS ...................................................................... 35 PROPOSED PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS .................................................................... 36 WETLAND BUFFER .......................................................................................................... 39 STORMWATER FACILITIES ........................................................................................... 39 EDUCATION SIGNS .......................................................................................................... 39 EDUCATION PROGRAM ................................................................................................. 39 PERMITS ............................................................................................................................. 39 EASEMENTS, CONCESSIONS, AND LEASES .............................................................. 40 VI. MANAGEMENT NEEDS ...................................................................................................... 41 COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT .................................................................................... 41 GREENWAYS .................................................................................................................... 41 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ................................................................................................. 42 MAINTENANCE ................................................................................................................ 42 SECURITY .......................................................................................................................... 43 STAFFING .......................................................................................................................... 43 VII. MONITORING AND REPORTING .................................................................................... 43 VII. REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................... 44 VIII. MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CHART .................................................. 46 EXHIBIT A LOCATION MAP................................................................................................... 51 EXHIBIT B PUBLIC LANDS MAP ........................................................................................... 52 EXHIBIT C ACQUISITION HISTORY .................................................................................... 53 EXHIBIT D PLATTED PORTION OF BARR HAMMOCK PRESERVE ............................... 54 EXHIBIT E SOILS MAP ............................................................................................................. 55 EXHIBIT F CONSERVATION EASEMENT BOUNDARIES ................................................. 56 EXHIBIT G NATURAL COMMUNITIES MAP ....................................................................... 57 EXHIBIT H MANAGEMENT ZONE MAP .............................................................................. 58 EXHIBIT K STAND MAP .......................................................................................................... 72 EXHIBIT L CONCEPTUAL SITE MAP .................................................................................... 73 EXHIBIT M1 FLORIDA ECOLOGICAL GREENWAYS NETWORK .................................... 74 EXHIBIT M2 EMERALD NECKLACE .................................................................................... 75 EXHIBIT N PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT .................................................................................... 76 EXHIBIT O AGENCY COMMENT ........................................................................................... 85 APPENDIX A1 FCT -- DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS – ORIGINAL BARR ACQUISITION ................................................................................................................. 87 APPENDIX A2 FCT DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS – LEVY PRAIRIE ADDITION ................................................................................................................................. 107 APPENDIX B DEEDS .............................................................................................................. 126 APPENDIX C SOIL DESCRIPTIONS ..................................................................................... 153 APPENDIX D WRP EASEMENT ............................................................................................ 158 APPENDIX E PERRY ADDITION CONSERVATION EASEMENT ................................... 170 APPENDIX F: LICENCE AGREEMENT WITH CONSERVATION TRUST FOR FLORIDA ..................................................................................................................................................... 181 Approved Management Plan May 2012 ii Barr Hammock Preserve Management Plan Summary Date of Plan: May 8 2012 Management Area: 5, 719 acres (original Barr Hammock acquisition 2,303 acres; Levy Prairie Addition 3,251 acres; Hare Addition 79 acres; Perry Addition 86 acres) Location: South Central Alachua County, near Alachua/Marion County line Date Acquired: September 26, 2006 (original Barr Hammock acquisition); March 13, 2009 (Levy Prairie Addition); March 13, 2009 (Hare Addition); December 9, 2010 (Perry Addition) Cost: Total: $14, 990,087:$9,957,376 (original Barr Hammock acquisition) + $4 million (Levy Prairie Addition) + $692,711 (Hare Addition) + $340,000_Perry Addition Funding Source: Original Barr Hammock acquisition: Alachua County Forever bond 37%, SWFWMD 3%, Florida Communities Trust grant 60%; Levy Prairie Addition: North American Wetland Conservation Act grant 20%, Florida Communities Trust grant 60%, Seller donation 20%; Hare Addition: Alachua County Forever bond 11%, Florida Communities Trust grant 60%, North American Wetland Conservation Act grant 29% ; Perry Addition:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Bees Are Back in Town
    Cindy Bennington & Peter May Volusia Sandhill can be compared to the Biology︱ pollinators visiting the sandhills of Heart Island Conservation Area to determine if the same number and species of pollinators are present in the urban ecosystem as in the larger natural area. Acmaeodera sp. (Family Buprestidae; the Agapostemon splendens (Family Halictidae - metallic wood-boring beetles). the halictid or sweat bees). PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS The bees are back Chauliognathus sp. (Family Cantharidae - the The pollinators we are most familiar with soldier beetles) - Leatherwing Beetle. are bees, though other insects including wasps, butterflies, beetles, and flies are also common pollinators. Insects visit the flowers to access the nectar and pollen in town as a food source, and in the process Pollinators in an urban ecosystem carry pollen between plants. Some plants, referred to as ‘specialists’, are only pollinated by one group of insects (for The growing urbanisation of ollinators are any animals (usually Stetson University researchers Professor example, they may only attract flies, or the landscape poses a major insects) that transfer pollen Cindy Bennington and Professor Peter have the pollen situated such that only threat to insect pollinators. The from one flower to another, and May investigate the pollinators visiting bees can collect it), and others may be P Strymon melinus (Family Lycaenidae - the reduction in number of these without them around 75% of flowering a small restoration area in an urban ‘generalists’, meaning that any insect that hairstreaks) - Red-banded Hairstreak. insects, especially bee species, plants would be unable to reproduce – ecosystem to compare how the numbers visits the flower can collect or deposit could have a severe impact on including many species that we rely on and species of insects present compare pollen.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmosoma Myrodora, Scarlet-Bodied Wasp Moth (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) Joseph Mccarthy, Forest Huval, Chris Carlton and Gene Reagan
    Pest Management and Insect Identification Series Cosmosoma myrodora, Scarlet-Bodied Wasp Moth (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) Joseph McCarthy, Forest Huval, Chris Carlton and Gene Reagan Description Larvae of the scarlet-bodied wasp moth are light yellow and are entirely covered in long, thin hairs.The The scarlet-bodied wasp moth is a member of the hairs are yellowish-white with black tips mixed with a few family Erebidae.The species is well known for its striking black hairs, giving it a speckled appearance.The head and coloration and Batesian mimicry. Batesian mimicry refers rear part of the body are darker yellow, along with the to a situation where an otherwise harmless animal legs. imitates the coloration and behavior of a dangerous or inedible animal to avoid predation.The adult has a bright The caterpillar of this species constructs a cocoon red thorax, abdomen and legs.The abdomen includes from its larval hairs to protect the pupa within.The eight visible segments.The first four are red with a black cocoon is transparent, yellow and speckled with small stripe down the middle and metallic blue spots on each black spots. segment.The last four segments are black, each with three metallic blue spots (one in the center and two on Life Cycle either side).The wings are clear with black veins and Females lay eggs on hempvine (Mikania cordifolia or a thick black outline.The head is metallic blue, bearing Mikania scandens), the larval host plant.When the larvae large, black eyes and black antennae with white tips.The emerge, they first eat their egg casings before moving on bright coloration, clear wings and bicolored antennae to the plant itself.After about one week under normal give the moth its “wasp-like” appearance.This mimicry summer conditions in Louisiana, larvae build their is most apparent when it is flying.The fast-moving wings cocoons and pupate.The adult moths emerge after about and warning colors are convincing.
    [Show full text]
  • Jonathan Dickinson State Park
    Jonathan Dickinson State Park APPROVED Unit Management Plan STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks June 15, 2012 i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK.....................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN .....................................................................7 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW................................................................9 Management Authority and Responsibility...................................................................9 Park Management Goals ............................................................................................10 Management Coordination.........................................................................................10 Public Participation....................................................................................................10 Other Designations ....................................................................................................11 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................13 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT ..................................................17 Natural Resources......................................................................................................17 Topography...........................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Desarrollo De Cosmosoma Myrodora Y Estigmene Acrea (Lepidoptera
    Desarrollo de Cosmosoma myrodora y Estigmene acrea (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) en la maleza Mikania micrantha y las plantas nativas Mikania cordifolia y Mikania scandens (Asteraceae) en Florida José Antonio Castillo Rosales Zamorano, Honduras Noviembre, 2012 i ZAMORANO DEPARTAMENTO DE CIENCIA Y PRODUCCIÓN AGROPECUARIA Desarrollo de Cosmosoma myrodora y Estigmene acrea (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) en la maleza Mikania micrantha y las plantas nativas Mikania cordifolia y Mikania scandens (Asteraceae) en Florida Proyecto especial de graduación presentado como requisito parcial para optar al título de Ingeniero Agrónomo en el Grado Académico de Licenciatura Presentado por: José Antonio Castillo Rosales Zamorano, Honduras Noviembre, 2012 ii Desarrollo de Cosmosoma myrodora y Estigmene acrea (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) en la maleza Mikania micrantha y las plantas nativas Mikania cordifolia y Mikania scandens (Asteraceae) en Florida Presentado por: José Antonio Castillo Rosales Aprobado: _____________________ _______________________ Alfredo Rueda, Ph.D. Abel Gernat, Ph.D. Asesor principal Director Carrera de Ingeniería A Agronómica ______________________ _______________________ Rodrigo Díaz, Ph. D. Raúl Zelaya, Ph. D. Asesor Decano académico ______________________ Verónica Manrique, Ph. D. Asesora iii RESUMEN Castillo Rosales, J. A. 2012. Desarrollo de Cosmosoma myrodora y Estigmene acrea (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) en la maleza Mikania micrantha y las plantas nativas Mikania cordifolia y Mikania scandens (Asteraceae) en Florida. Proyecto especial de graduación del programa de Ingeniería Agronómica, Escuela Agrícola Panamericana, Zamorano. Honduras. 17 p. Mikania micrantha Kunth (Asteraceae) es una maleza considerada entre las 10 más agresivas del mundo. Mikania micrantha es nativa de regiones tropicales y subtropicales de centro, Sur América y el Caribe. En el año 2009, se reportó en la presencia de M.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article Immature Stages and Life Cycle of the Wasp Moth, Cosmosoma Auge (Lepidoptera: Erebidae: Arctiinae) Under Laboratory Conditions
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Psyche Volume 2014, Article ID 328030, 6 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/328030 Research Article Immature Stages and Life Cycle of the Wasp Moth, Cosmosoma auge (Lepidoptera: Erebidae: Arctiinae) under Laboratory Conditions Gunnary León-Finalé and Alejandro Barro Department of Animal and Human Biology, Faculty of Biology, University of Havana, Calle 25 No. 455 Entre I y J, Vedado, Municipio Plaza, 10400 Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba Correspondence should be addressed to Alejandro Barro; [email protected] Received 24 February 2014; Revised 20 May 2014; Accepted 29 May 2014; Published 9 July 2014 Academic Editor: Kent S. Shelby Copyright © 2014 G. Leon-Final´ e´ and A. Barro. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Cosmosoma auge (Linnaeus 1767) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) is a Neotropical arctiid moth common in Cuban mountainous areas; however, its life cycle remains unknown. In this work, C. auge life cycle is described for the first time; also, immature stages are describedusingaCubanpopulation.LarvaewereobtainedfromgravidwildfemalescaughtinVinales˜ National Park and were fed with fresh leaves of its host plant, the climbing hempweed Mikania micrantha Kunth (Asterales: Asteraceae), which is a new host plant record. Eggs are hemispherical and hatching occurred five days after laying. Larval period had six instars and lasted between 20 and 22 days. First and last larval stages are easily distinguishable from others. First stage has body covered by chalazae and last stage has body covered by verrucae as other stages but has a tuft on each side of A1 and A7.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Erebidae) En Condiciones De Cautiverio
    REVISTA CUBANA DE CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS http://www.rccb.uh.cu ARTÍCULO ORIGINAL Reproducción de la polilla Cosmosoma auge (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) en condiciones de cautiverio Reproduction of the moth Cosmosoma auge (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) in captivity conditions Gunnary León-Finalé y Alejandro Barro* Facultad de Biología RESUMEN Universidad de La Habana Cosmosoma auge es una especie de polilla ampliamente distribuida en la * Autor para correspondencia: región Neotropical y en Cuba de la que no existe información sobre su re- [email protected] producción, ni ningún otro aspecto de su historia natural. Por esto el objeti- vo de este trabajo es la descripción algunos eventos precopulatorios y copu- latorios de C. auge en condiciones de cautiverio. Para esto se observaron 397 individuos de ambos sexos pertenecientes a tres cohortes criadas en cautiverio durante todas las noches desde su emersión hasta su muerte. Se registró la hora y día de emersión, aparición de la posición de llamada en las hembras y día de la cópula. Estas variables se compararon entre individuos de diferente sexo y/o edad según aplicara. En esta especie existe protoginia ya que las hembras emergieron antes que los machos como ocurre en otras especies de ctenúquidos. Además tanto la posición de llamada como el inicio de la cópula ocurrieron en las primeras horas de la noche y tuvieron una duración muy variable. La duración de la posición de llamada podría deberse a las condiciones nutricionales de la hembra, mientras que la dura- ción de la cópula a una conducta de cuidado de la pareja por parte de los machos.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmosoma Myrodora Dyar in Louisiana by Vernon Antoine Brou Jr., 74320 Jack Loyd Road, Abita Springs, Louisiana 70420 E-Mail: [email protected]
    Cosmosoma myrodora Dyar in Louisiana by Vernon Antoine Brou Jr., 74320 Jack Loyd Road, Abita Springs, Louisiana 70420 e-mail: [email protected] The scarlet-bodied wasp moth, Cosmosoma myrodora Dyar (Fig. 1.), is a commonly encountered day flying moth which also occurs abundantly at ultra-violet light traps. This is perhaps the most beautifully-colored moth known to occur in Louisiana, the thorax, legs, and much of the abdomen are bright red, a black mid-dorsal abdominal band interrupts the proximal red part of the abdomen and attaches to the black distal abdominal segments. All of the black abdominal areas are festooned with iridescent blue patches of scales, similar blue scales form collar behind head. The wings are transparent, except for the borders (wing edges and apex) and the veins which are covered in jet black scales. The proximal two-thirds of the antennae is black, the distal third is white. In Louisiana, myrodora has been collected in the following parishes: Ascension, East Baton Rouge, Iberville, Lafourche, Orleans, St. Charles, St. John, St. Tammany, and West Feliciana. There has been most interesting research on this moth (Conner et al, 2000) and it's relationship to alkaloid containing plants. Cosmosoma myrodora like some other Arctiidae possess male abdominal pouches which are capable of emitting flocculent. Conner (2000) reported myrodora to be attracted to pyrrolizidine alkaloid-containing dried roots of Eupatorium capillifolium (Asteraceae). Connor reported the alkaloid laden flocculent apparently acts as a defense mechanism against predatory spiders. Males acquire the alkaloid by feeding on plant fluids, they transfer this protection to females during courtship by discharging alkaloid laden filaments upon her and by seminal infusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Erebidae: Arctiinae)
    Phylogeny and Evolution of Pharmacophagy in Tiger Moths (Lepidoptera: Erebidae: Arctiinae) Jennifer M. Zaspel1*, Susan J. Weller2,5, Charles T. Wardwell2, Reza Zahiri3, Niklas Wahlberg4 1 Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America, 2 Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America, 3 Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 4 Laboratory of Genetics, Department of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland, 5 Bell Museum of Natural History, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America Abstract The focus of this study was to reconstruct a phylogenetic hypothesis for the moth subfamily Arctiinae (tiger moths, woolly bears) to investigate the evolution of larval and adult pharmacophagy of pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) and the pathway to PA chemical specialization in Arctiinae. Pharmacophagy, collection of chemicals for non-nutritive purposes, is well documented in many species, including the model species Utetheisa ornatrix L. A total of 86 exemplar ingroup species representing tiger moth tribes and subtribes (68 genera) and nine outgroup species were selected. Ingroup species included the most species- rich generic groups to represent the diversity of host-plant associations and pharmacophagous behaviors found throughout Arctiinae. Up to nine genetic markers were sequenced: one mitochondrial (COI barcode region), one nuclear rRNA (D2 region, 28S rRNA), and seven nuclear protein-coding gene fragments: elongation factor 1-a protein, wingless, ribosomal protein subunit S5, carbamoylphosphate synthase domain regions, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, isocitrate dehydrogenase and cytosolic malate dehydrogenase. A total of 6984 bp was obtained for most species. These data were analyzed using model-based phylogenetic methods: maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI).
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Clinch State Park
    Fort Clinch State Park Approved Unit Management Plan STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks August 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ....................................... 1 Park Significance ................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN..................................................... 2 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................... 8 Management Authority and Responsibility .............................................. 8 Park Management Goals ...................................................................... 8 Management Coordination ................................................................... 9 Public Participation ..............................................................................9 Other Designations ........................................................................... 10 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 11 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT..................................... 12 Natural Resources ............................................................................. 12 Topography .................................................................................. 12 Geology ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quinolizidine and Pyrrolizidine Alkaloid Chemical Ecology – a Mini-Review on Their Similarities and Differences
    Quinolizidine and Pyrrolizidine Alkaloid Chemical Ecology – a Mini-Review on Their Similarities and Differences Michael Wink Journal of Chemical Ecology ISSN 0098-0331 Volume 45 Number 2 J Chem Ecol (2019) 45:109-115 DOI 10.1007/s10886-018-1005-6 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self-archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self- archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy Journal of Chemical Ecology (2019) 45:109–115 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-018-1005-6 REVIEW ARTICLE Quinolizidine and Pyrrolizidine Alkaloid Chemical Ecology – a Mini-Review on Their Similarities and Differences Michael Wink1 Received: 27 February 2018 /Revised: 13 July 2018 /Accepted: 30 July 2018 /Published online: 6 August 2018 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract This mini-review summarizes over 40 years of research on quinolizidine (QAs) and pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs). Emphasis is on the chemical ecology of both groups of alkaloids, which serve as general defense compounds against herbivores for the plants producing them.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal Species of North Carolina
    NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM LIST OF THE RARE ANIMAL SPECIES OF NORTH CAROLINA 2012 Great Tiger Moth (Arctia caja) photo by Stephen P. Hall Compiled by Harry E. LeGrand, Jr., Vertebrate Zoologist John T. Finnegan, Conservation Information Manager Stephen P. Hall, Landscape Ecologist Andrea J. Leslie, Freshwater Ecologist Judith A. Ratcliffe, Freshwater Ecologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, & Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM LIST OF THE RARE ANIMAL SPECIES OF NORTH CAROLINA 2012 Compiled by Harry E. LeGrand, Jr., Vertebrate Zoologist John T. Finnegan, Conservation Information Manager Stephen P. Hall, Landscape Ecologist Andrea J. Leslie, Freshwater Ecologist Judith A. Ratcliffe, Freshwater Ecologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as further data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. The list is published periodically, generally every two years. Further information on these species may be obtained by contacting the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601, or by contacting the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, 1722 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1722. Additional information on rare species, as well as a digital version of
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Check List of the Noctuoidea (Insecta, Lepidoptera) of North America North of Mexico
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeysAnnotated 40: 1–239 (2010) check list of the Noctuoidea (Insecta, Lepidoptera) of North America north of Mexico 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.40.414 MONOGRAPH www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Annotated check list of the Noctuoidea (Insecta, Lepidoptera) of North America north of Mexico J. Donald Lafontaine1, B. Christian Schmidt2 1 Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes, Biodiversity Program, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 2 Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 Corresponding authors: J. Donald Lafontaine ([email protected]), B. Christian Schmidt (Chris. [email protected]) Academic editor: James K. Adams | Received 30 November 2009 | Accepted 14 February 2010 | Published 19 March 2010 Citation: Lafontaine JD, Schmidt BC (2010) Annotated check list of the Noctuoidea (Insecta, Lepidoptera) of North America north of Mexico. ZooKeys 40: 1–239. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.40.414 Abstract An annotated check list of the North American species of Noctuoidea (Lepidoptera) is presented, consist- ing of 3693 species. One-hundred and sixty-six taxonomic changes are proposed, consisting of 13 species- group taxa accorded species status (stat. n. and stat. rev.), 2 revalidated genus-group taxa (stat. rev.), and 2 family-group taxa raised to subfamily. Sixty-nine species-group taxa are downgraded to junior synonyms or subspecies (stat. n., syn. rev., and syn. n.), and 6 genera relegated to synonymy.
    [Show full text]