DOCSLIB.ORG

Country Report on England, Wales and Northern Ireland for the Study on Member States' Policies for Children with Disabilities ______

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Country Report on England, Wales and Northern Ireland for the Study on Member States' Policies for Children with Disabilities ______ DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT C: CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS Country Report on England, Wales and Northern Ireland for the Study on Member States' Policies for Children with Disabilities STUDY Abstract This study looks at the situation of children with disabilities in England, Wales and Northern Ireland to identify the gaps in the legal frameworks and its implementation, the obstacles faced by children with disabilities and best practices. This country study is part of a larger study which analyses 18 Member States. Based on a comparative analysis of the country studies, the report ‘Study on Member States' Policies for Children with Disabilities’ provides some recommendations for EU action to enhance the situation of children with disabilities. PE 474.434 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. AUTHOR(S) Gavin McBride Under the supervision of Milieu Ltd. (Belgium); Project Managers: Marta Ballesteros and Nathalie Meurens, e-mail: [email protected] and [email protected]; Milieu Ltd, 15 rue Blanche, B-1050, Brussels, Tel: +32 2 514 3601; Fax +32 2 514 3603; web address: http://www.milieu.be/. RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Erika Schulze Policy Department C - Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its newsletter please write to: [email protected] European Parliament, manuscript completed in June 2013. © European Union, Brussels, 2013. This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. 2 Country Report on England, Wales and Northern Ireland for the Study on Member States' policies for children with disabilities ____________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 7 1. OVERVIEW OF THE SITUATION AND CHALLENGES FOR CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES IN ENGLAND, WALES AND NORTHERN IRELAND 9 1.1. Introduction to the situation of children with disabilities in England, Wales and Northern Ireland 9 1.2. Review of issues and identification of possible regulatory gaps 12 2. OVERVIEW OF THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK IN ENGLAND, WALES AND NORTHERN IRELAND 14 2.1. General overview of the national legal and institutional framework 14 2.2. Children with disabilities specific legal and institutional framework 15 2.2.1. Legal framework 15 2.2.2. Institutions and authorities 16 2.2.3. Definitions 17 3. LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND IMPLEMENTATION ASSESSMENT 18 3.1. Implementation of the provisions of the CRPD and CRC 18 3.1.1. Best interests of the child (Art. 3 CRC; Art. 7 CRPD) 19 3.1.2. Non-discrimination (Art. 2 CRC; Arts. 3 and 5 CRPD) 21 3.1.3. Evolving capacities of the child (Art. 5 CRC and Art. 3 CRPD) 22 3.1.4. The right to be heard/to participate (Art. 12 CRC; Arts. 7 and 30 CRPD) 22 3.1.5. Freedom from violence (Art. 19 CRC; Art. 16 CRPD) 23 3.1.6. Right to family life (Art. 9 CRC; Art. 23(3) CRPD) 24 3.1.7. Right to assistance (Art. 23 CRC; Arts. 23(5), 26 and 28 CRPD) 25 3.1.8. The right to inclusive education (Art. 28 CRC; Art. 24 CRPD) 27 3.2. Specific issues faced by children with disabilities 28 3.2.1. Gender vulnerability 28 3.2.2. Violence 29 3.2.3. Children as vulnerable suspects 30 3.2.4. Inclusive education 31 3.2.5. Other particular issues faced by children with disabilities in England, Wales and Northern Ireland 32 3 Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 4. ASSESSMENT OF THE PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RIGHTS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES 33 4.1. Enforcement and reporting mechanisms 33 4.2. Gaps, problems and issues in the implementation 35 4.3. Best practices 35 4.4. Data and monitoring mechanisms 36 4.5. Recommendations given by the literature 37 5. CONCLUSIONS 41 REFERENCES 42 ANNEX 1 – SUMMARY TABLE 46 ANNEX 2 – STATISTICAL INFORMATION 57 ANNEX 3 - STUDY ON MEMBER STATES' POLICIES FOR CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 58 ANNEX 4 - OVERVIEW OF RELATED STUDIES 69 4 Country Report on England, Wales and Northern Ireland for the Study on Member States' policies for children with disabilities ____________________________________________________________________________________________ LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Art. Article Charter The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union CDSA Children with Disabilities Strategic Alliance CJEU Court of Justice of the European Union CRC United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child CRPD United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities DDA Disability Discrimination Act ECM Every Child Matters, 2004 ECHR Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms EU The European Union E&W England and Wales JCHR Joint Committee on Human Rights LSCBs Local Safegarding Children’s Boards NI Northern Ireland s Section SEN Special Educational Needs SI Statutory Instrument TEU Treaty on the European Union TFEU Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union OFMDFM Office of First Minister and Deputy First Minister UK United Kingdom UN United Nations YJS Youth Justice System 5 Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs ____________________________________________________________________________________________ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The UK framework relating to children with disabilities consists of a complex array of overlapping sectoral and cross-sectoral law and policy including children’s’ rights and rights for persons with disabilities, as well as regulations on health and social care, education and criminal justice. The primary issue identified in this study is that neither the CRC nor CRPD have been incorporated into UK law. Therefore, none of the Conventions’ provisions or principles can be directly invoked before courts in the UK. However, despite this issue, most of the Conventions’ provisions have been implemented indirectly in the UK way by a variety of different pieces of sectoral and cross-sectoral legislation. For example, the ‘best interests’ principle has been implemented in part by specific provisions of UK legislation that requires, inter alia, the child’s welfare to be the court’s paramount consideration when determining any question with respect to his/her upbringing. The UK legislation also places a general responsibility on the Children’s Commissioners1 to promote awareness of the views and interests of children. The main gap in implementation relates to the right to inclusive education, since the UK has reserved the right for children with disabilities to be educated outside their local community in the event where more appropriate education provision is available elsewhere. This is arguably not compatible with the concept of inclusive education envisaged by the Convention.2 The sectoral and cross-sectoral nature of disability rights and children’s rights in the UK, coupled with differing legislative and administrative provisions for child protection throughout the UK’s three jurisdictions (Northern Ireland, England and Wales, and Scotland)3 has contributed to a complex system which, as many children’s rights commentators argue, lacks coordination and clarity, particularly as regards available disability-oriented information for families and carers of children with disabilities. However, recent policy and legislative developments have been made in both disability and children’s policy, e.g. the Family Justice Review and Board aims to improve the system in favour of children’s rights. The Children and Families Bill, due in early 2013, is also viewed as an opportunity to strengthen child-oriented institutions such as the Children’s Commissioner. Other areas for improvement include increasing opportunities for child participation, particularly as regards Special Educational Needs and children’s assessment process and lack of their legal rights to make an appeal to the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal. Recommendations by UK stakeholders included the need for legislative changes to strengthen the role of the Children’s Commissioner to promote and protect children’s rights. It has also been recommended that national legislation should reflect specific reference to the requirement of monitoring the UK’s implementation of both Conventions. The UK government has also recently carried consultations on the introduction of a Bill of Rights, and children’s organisations see this as an opportunity to incorporate the CRC into UK law. 1 Each country in the UK has its own Children’s Commissioner, responsible for safeguarding and promoting the rights and welfare of children. 2 UK Parliament website, UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Reservations and Interpretative Declaration - Human Rights Joint Committee, available at: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt200809/jtselect/jtrights/70/7006.htm. 3 Scotland does
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maintaining World Class Schools Is an Invitation to Debate the Future and to Build Upon Our Success As an Education Nation
    NASUWT The Teachers’ Union W aintaining World Class Schools As adopted at NASUWT Annual Conference, Bournemouth 2013 CONTENTS Foreword 5 Introduction 6 Headline proposals 8 UK education in crisis? 11 The purposes of publicly funded education 14 Role of government in education 22 The funding challenge for securing quality public education for all 27 Public education and the private sector 33 Teachers and quality public education 38 The curriculum for quality public education 43 Accountability in public education 45 Epilogue – the limits of international comparisons 51 Annex 1: International Declarations and Conventions 53 Annex 2: Matters arising from monitoring by the International Labour Organization (ILO) Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations (CEACR) (2010-2012) 72 Annex 3: Relevant ILO Conventions not ratified by the UK Government 79 Annex 4: A human rights framework for evaluating public education 81 References 84 3 LIST OF ACRONYMS CBI Confederation for British Industry CPD Continuing Professional Development CSE Civic and Social Engagement EBC English Baccalaureate Certificate EI Education International GCSE General Certificate of Secondary Education GDP Gross Domestic Product ILO International Labour Organisation ITE Initial Teacher Education NEA National Education Association (USA) OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development PIRLS Progress in International Reading Literacy Study PISA Programme for International Student Assessment TIMSS Trends in Mathematics and Science Study UN United Nations UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund 4 FOREWORD The NASUWT is a trade union with a proud history and a tradition of making a difference. Our mission is to create the conditions that enable teachers to secure the best educational opportunities for all children and young people, something which we strive to achieve through our pragmatic approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Education and Childcare Statutory Guidance for Local Authorities
    Early education and childcare Statutory guidance for local authorities March 2018 Contents Summary 4 About this guidance 4 Review date 4 What legislation does this guidance refer to? 4 Who is this guidance for? 5 Main points 5 Part A: Free places for two-, three- and four-year-olds 7 Section A1: Eligibility 7 Section A2: Flexibility 14 Section A3: Quality 16 Section A4: Funding places 18 A4a: Early years national funding formula 18 A4b: Scope of requirements on providers 21 Part B: Securing sufficient childcare 26 Part C: Information to parents 28 Part D: Information to childcare providers 32 Part E: Legal annex and other relevant information 33 Summary of the key provisions in the Childcare Act 2006 relating to early education and childcare 33 Summary of the key provisions in the Childcare Act 2016 34 Regulations made under the Childcare Act 2006 35 Regulations made under the Childcare Act 2016 35 Eligibility for free early education for two-, three- and four-year- olds 36 Assessing eligibility for parents in receipt of Universal Credit 37 Eligibility for free childcare for three- and four-year- olds of working parents 40 2 Type of free early education and free early years provision for two-, three- and four- year-olds 41 Amount of free early education for two-, three- and four-year-olds 42 Amount of free childcare for three- and four-year-olds of working parents 42 Childminders 42 Special educational needs 42 Education, Health and Care plans 43 Equality 43 Early years national funding formula 44 Compulsory school age 44 School admissions 44 Admission of children below compulsory school age and deferred entry to school 44 The admission of summer born children outside their normal age group 45 Free school meals 45 Looked after children 46 3 Summary About this guidance This statutory guidance from the Department for Education is for English local authorities on their duties pursuant to section 2 of the Childcare Act 2016 and sections 6, 7, 7A, 9A, 12 and 13 of the Childcare Act 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Schools Causign Concern
    Schools causing concern Statutory guidance for local authorities January 2015 Contents Summary 3 Section 1: Introduction 8 Section 2: Schools causing concern 10 1. Schools eligible for intervention as a result of a warning notice 10 2. Schools eligible for intervention as a result of having been judged as “requiring significant improvement” or “special measures” 12 Section 3: Warning notices 13 1. Giving a warning notice 13 2. Making representations against the warning notice 14 3. Power of the Secretary of State to direct the local authority to consider giving and to give a warning notice 15 Section 4: Local authorities’ powers of intervention 17 1. Power to suspend the delegated authority for the governing body to manage a school’s budget 17 2. Power to appoint an Interim Executive Board (IEB) 17 3. Power to appoint additional governors 20 4. Power to require the governing body to enter into arrangements 21 Section 5: Secretary of State's powers of intervention 22 1. Power to appoint additional governors 22 2. Power to direct the closure of a school 22 3. Power to provide for the governing body to consist of interim executive members 23 4. Power to make an academy order 23 Section 6: Governance 22 Further sources of information 26 Associated resources (external links) 27 Other departmental resources 27 2 Summary About this guidance This is statutory guidance given by the Department for Education, on behalf of the Secretary of State, relating to maintained schools causing concern. Section 72 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006 places a statutory duty on all local authorities in England, in exercising their functions in respect of schools causing concern as set out in Part 4 of the 2006 Act, to have regard to any guidance given from time to time by the Secretary of State.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Act 2011
    EXPLANATORY NOTES Education Act 2011 Chapter 21 £9.75 These notes refer to the Education Act 2011 (c.21) which received Royal Assent on 15 November 2011 EDUCATION ACT 2011 —————————— EXPLANATORY NOTES INTRODUCTION 1. These Explanatory Notes relate to the Education Act which received Royal Assent on 15 November 2011. They have been prepared by the Department for Education (DfE) and the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) in order to assist the reader in understanding the Act. They do not form part of the Act and have not been endorsed by Parliament. 2. The Notes need to be read in conjunction with the Act. They are not, and are not meant to be, a comprehensive description of the Act. So where a section or part of a section does not seem to require any explanation or comment, none is given. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND 3. The Education Act is founded on the principles and proposals in the Department for Education November 2010 White Paper, The Importance of Teaching (CM-7980). The Act includes measures to increase the authority of teachers to discipline pupils and ensure good behaviour, with a general power to search pupils for items banned under the school’s rules, the ability to issue same-day detentions and pre-charge anonymity when faced with an allegation by a pupil of a criminal offence. 4. The Act removes duties on schools and local authorities to give them greater freedom to decide how to fulfil their functions. The Academies programme will be extended, with Academies for 16 to 19 year olds and alternative provision Academies.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study of the English Early Childhood Education and Care System
    e Early h l Case Studies na of E A atio ar Trn ly d te Ch In il dh v o o d a E d u n c a t io t n a a n d g C a r e e S y s t e m s EvolvingResponsive a HarmonizedIntegrated Policymaking and Hybrid andUniversal Implementation:System of ECEC: Maintaining the Reform Momentum RespectingEarlyAFrom Careful Childhood Equality Children Balancing to Services:and Equity ActFamilies Using Data for Improvement HongSingaporeAustraliaEnglandFinland Kong Integrated and Universal Early Childhood Services: Using Data for Improvement A Case Study of the English Early Childhood Education and Care System Professor Kathy Sylva, Grace Murkett, and Beatriz Melendro October 5, 2018 CopyrightÓ 2018 Teachers College All rights reserved International Case Studies of Innovative Early Childhood Systems: England Contents Executive Summary 1 Part 1 Introduction 11 Chapter 1: Study Overview .......................................................................................................... 12 Rationale and Goals ................................................................................................................... 12 Study Architecture ..................................................................................................................... 14 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 20 Data Collection, Analysis, and Validation................................................................................ 24 Definitions and Abbreviations
    [Show full text]
  • Equality Act 2010
    Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Equality Act 2010. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) Equality Act 2010 2010 CHAPTER 15 PART 6 EDUCATION CHAPTER 1 SCHOOLS Annotations: Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Pt. 6 Ch. 1: power to amend or repeal conferred (10.2.2012) by Education (Wales) Measure 2009 (nawm 5), s. 18(2)(c) (as amended by S.I. 2011/1651, art. 12(b)); S.I. 2012/320, art. 2(g) 84 Application of this Chapter This Chapter does not apply to the following protected characteristics— (a) age; (b) marriage and civil partnership. 85 Pupils: admission and treatment, etc. (1) The responsible body of a school to which this section applies must not discriminate against a person— (a) in the arrangements it makes for deciding who is offered admission as a pupil; (b) as to the terms on which it offers to admit the person as a pupil; (c) by not admitting the person as a pupil. (2) The responsible body of such a school must not discriminate against a pupil— (a) in the way it provides education for the pupil; 2 Equality Act 2010 (c. 15) Part 6 – Education Chapter 1 – Schools Document Generated: 2016-10-13 Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Equality Act 2010. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations.
    [Show full text]
  • Existing Academy: the Magna Carta School URN: 137116 Predecessor School: the Magna Carta School URN: 125258
    Existing academy: The Magna Carta School URN: 137116 Predecessor school: The Magna Carta School URN: 125258 Thorpe Road TW18 3HJ Academy conversion and predecessor schools Under the Academies Act 2010, schools may apply to the Secretary of State to convert to academy status. Such schools are known as academy converters. Upon conversion to academy status the existing school closes and a new school opens in its place. Although little may have changed, the academy converter is a new legal entity. Most academy converters have yet to have a section 5 inspection. However, to assist parents and other interested parties, information about, and the inspection history of the school which preceded the new academy are available here. It is important to note that, as the academy converter is a new school, which may not yet have been inspected, the inspection judgements of the predecessor school are not those of the new academy. However, the most recent inspection judgements of the predecessor school are taken into account by Ofsted for the purpose of scheduling the first inspection of the new academy converter. Some academy converters have replaced schools which were judged to be outstanding at their most recent Ofsted inspection. Under the Education Act 2011, most schools previously judged to be outstanding will be exempt from routine inspection. This means they will not be subject to inspection at regular intervals. However, three years after the predecessor school was last inspected it will be subject to Ofsted’s formal risk-assessment process, which may lead to an inspection. Finally, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 the Chief Inspector may decide to inspect any school in England if requested to do so by the Secretary of State, or if, based on information received by Ofsted, he judges that a school would benefit from inspection.
    [Show full text]
  • The Need for Policy Stability in Education a Critique Of
    THE NEED FOR POLICY STABILITY IN EDUCATION A CRITIQUE OF EDUCATION POLICY FORMATION: RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS (ENGLAND) In its 2015 analysis of education policy in the UK, as compared to other An Institute of Government report in 2017 described an jurisdictions, the OECD singled out the UK system as being particularly education environment of ‘costly policy change and churn: subject to churn. In the UK, ‘rather than build on the foundations laid by New organisations replace old ones; one policy is ended previous administrations, the temptation is always to scrap existing while a remarkably similar one is launched’ (Norris and Adam initiatives and start afresh’ (OECD 2015, 152). 2017, 3). Version 3.0 18.2.20 (see end for version control) V 2.0 17th December 2019 Wall, Warriner, Luck – December 2019 1 The need for policy stability in education: content 1. EXTENT OF POLICY CHANGE IN EDUCATION 2. EXAMPLES OF POLICY CHANGE AND CHURN 3. PROBLEMS CREATED BY CONSTANT CHANGE 4. INSTITUTIONAL ENABLERS OF CHANGE 5. FACTORS DRIVING SO MUCH CHANGE AND CHURN 6. LESSONS FROM OVERSEAS 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Wall, Warriner, Luck – December 2019 2 EXTENT OF POLICY CHANGE IN EDUCATION Slides • Summary: policy change and churn is the dysfunctional characteristic of Education in England • There have been over 80 Government Acts relating to Education since 1979 • Education Acts have run at three to five times other departments • The House of Lords highlighted the greater issue with “secondary legislation” in 2009 • Statutory Instruments have run at an average of 88 per year since 1988 • Statutory Instruments determine policy in the most critical areas of Education • Education Acts are constantly reworked so there is no continuity • The extent of existing policy makes it incomprehensible Wall, Warriner, Luck – December 2019 3 There have been over 80 Acts relating to education since 1979 • Education in England is characterised by high levels of ‘policy churn’ and this is driven through government legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Academies, Autonomy, Equality and Democratic Accountability: Reforming the Fragmented Publicly Funded School System in England’
    West, A. and Wolfe, D. (2019) ‘Academies, autonomy, equality and democratic accountability: Reforming the fragmented publicly funded school system in England’. London Review of Education, 17 (1): 70–86. DOI https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.17.1.06 Academies, autonomy, equality and democratic accountability: Reforming the fragmented publicly funded school system in England Anne West* − London School of Economics and Political Science, UK David Wolfe − Matrix Chambers, UK Abstract This article focuses on the transformative academies policy in England. Based on an analysis of documentary evidence, we argue that the policy has resulted in the fragmentation of the state-funded school system and stark variation between academies, with those within multi-academy trusts (MATs) having no legal identity. We examine the variation between funding agreements, the control by central government, the role of MATs and the governance of academies. We propose policy options to improve the current incoherent and fragmented set of provisions, including restoring the legal identity of schools in MATs and allowing academies if they so wish, to convert to maintained schools. Keywords: academies; multi-academy trusts (MATs); funding agreements; law; governance; finance Introduction Since 2000 there has been a rapid and radical transformation of publicly funded school- based education in England: over a third of schools – and nearly three-quarters of secondary schools – are now ‘academies’ rather than ‘maintained’ by local authorities. Academies are owned and run by not-for-profit private trusts (exempt charities) that register as companies with Companies House and are subject to company law. They are controlled and funded directly by central government by means of a contract – a funding agreement – between a trust (that is, a legal entity) and the Secretary of State for Education (DfE, 2018a), rather than being run by a governing body in accordance with statutory education law, as is essentially the case for maintained schools.
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgements I Wish to Thank Professor Peter Earley And
    Acknowledgements I wish to thank Professor Peter Earley and Professor Gerald Grace, my supervisors, together with Dr Paddy Walsh for their critical friendship and encouragement throughout the research period. I also thank my wife, Nellie for her patience and understanding. I was also fortunate in having the support of my daughter, Mary O’Hara, son-in-law Declan and grandchildren Marie, Annie and Eoin. My son David was a great help with discussions on legal matters. The whole family was supportive and encouraging. I thank Mrs Marita Hammond, a family friend, who deciphered my handwriting and speedily word-processed the script. Finally, I owe a great debt, as an octogenarian, to relatives now deceased. From being a homeless child in the Blitz on London in 1940, through childhood and to manhood, I had great support in study and pursuing a successful career. Thank you. Annex Salient features of leadership revealed in the thesis Of the many aspects of leadership exhibited by the Head Teacher cum Executive Head (Head) of the federated school who has emerged as the central driving force in the case study, the following appear to be most important and capable of application generally for any Head or, indeed, any teacher. In order of importance: a) Moral purpose and ethical actions b) Adaptability and flexibility c) Putting vision into practice a) Moral purpose and ethical actions To act morally is considered by many as a virtue (Pring 2015, p.183). A virtue is defined as a disposition, deep and enduring which involves a person to pursue a course of action, despite the difficulties and challenges, which the person considers to be good and appropriate (ibid).
    [Show full text]
  • Justice Wide Open’ Is the Third Set of Working Papers in a Series from the Centre for Law Justice and Journalism at City University London
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE 0 provided by City Research Online &HQWUHIRU/DZ-XVWLFH DQG-RXUQDOLVP &/-- -867,&(:,'(23(1 :25.,1*3$3(56 (GLWRU-XGLWK7RZQHQG $XWKRUV(PLO\$OOERQ'DYLG%DQLVDU+HDWKHU%URRNH3URIHVVRU,DQ&UDP0LNH'RGG 'U'DYLG*ROGEHUJ1LFN+ROPHV'U/DZUHQFH0F1DPDUD/RUG1HXEHUJHU:LOOLDP3HUULQ *HRIIUH\5REHUWVRQ4&/XF\6HULHV+XJK7RPOLQVRQ4&3URIHVVRU+RZDUG7XPEHU $GDP:DJQHU Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism (CLJJ) The Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism is the first major interdisciplinary centre in the UK to develop a broad, yet focused, interface between law, justice and journalism in society. The centre aims to harness and maximise opportunities for research collaboration, knowledge transfer and teaching to become an international centre of excellence and brings together expertise in the disciplines of Law, Criminology and Journalism at City University London. CLJJ Working Papers: ‘Justice Wide Open’ is the third set of working papers in a series from the Centre for Law Justice and Journalism at City University London. This publication by leading lawyers, academics and journalists is part of the CLJJ’s new ‘Open Justice in the Digital Era’ project, launched at an event at City University London on 29 February 2012. Leadership and Expertise: The Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism (CLJJ) is directed by three of City University London’s leading academics, as well as being supported by a number of specialists from the university. Professor Howard Tumber, CLJJ Director (Journalism) is Professor of Journalism and Communication within the Graduate School of Journalism, City University London, and has published widely in the field of the sociology of news and journalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Form and Accessibility of the Law Applicable in Wales
    Law Commission Consultation Paper No 223 FORM AND ACCESSIBILITY OF THE LAW APPLICABLE IN WALES A Consultation Paper ii THE LAW COMMISSION – HOW WE CONSULT About the Commission: The Law Commission is the statutory independent body created by the Law Commissions Act 1965 to keep the law under review and to recommend reform where it is needed. The Law Commissioners are: The Rt Hon Lord Justice Lloyd Jones (Chairman), Stephen Lewis, Professor David Ormerod QC and Nicholas Paines QC. The Chief Executive is Elaine Lorimer. Topic of this consultation paper: The form and accessibility of the law applicable in Wales. Availability of materials: This consultation paper is available on our website in English and in Welsh at http://www.lawcom.gov.uk. Duration of the consultation: 9 July 2015 to 9 October 2015. How to respond Please send your responses either: By email to: [email protected] or By post to: Sarah Young, Law Commission, 1st Floor, Tower, Post Point 1.54, 52 Queen Anne’s Gate, London SW1H 9AG Tel: 020 3334 3953 If you send your comments by post, it would be helpful if, where possible, you also send them to us electronically. After the consultation: In the light of the responses we receive, we will decide our final recommendations and we will present them to the Welsh Government. Consultation Principles: The Law Commission follows the Consultation Principles set out by the Cabinet Office, which provide guidance on type and scale of consultation, duration, timing, accessibility and transparency. The Principles are available on the Cabinet Office website at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/consultation-principles-guidance.
    [Show full text]