DOCSLIB.ORG

Twenty-Eighth Report of Session 2006–07

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments Twenty-eighth Report of Session 2006–07 Drawing special attention to: European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation Regulations 2007 (S.I. 2007/1949) Gas (Applications for Licences and Extensions and Restrictions of Licences) Regulations 2007 (S.I. 2007/1971) Electricity (Applications for Licences, Modifications of an Area and Extensions and Restrictions of Licences) Regulations 2007 (S.I. 2007/1972) Heather and Grass etc. Burning (England) Regulations 2007 (S.I. 2007/2003) Social Security (Contributions) (Amendment No. 5) Regulations 2007 (S.I. 2007/2068) Criminal Procedure (Amendment No. 2) Rules 2007 (S.I. 2007/2317) Ordered by The House of Lords to be printed 24 October 2007 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 24 October 2007 HL Paper 191 HC 82-xxviii Published on 29 October 2007 by authority of the House of Lords and the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments Current membership House of Lords House of Commons Earl Attlee (Conservative) David Maclean MP (Conservative, Penrith and The Border) Lord Dykes (Liberal Democrat) (Chairman) Baroness Gale (Labour) Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods MP (Labour, City of Durham) Lord Gould of Brookwood (Labour) Mr Peter Bone MP (Conservative, Wellingborough) Lord Kimball (Conservative) Michael Jabez Foster MP (Labour, Hastings and Rye) Countess of Mar (Crossbench) Mr David Kidney MP (Labour, Stafford) Lord Walpole (Crossbench) Mr John MacDougall MP (Labour, Central Fife) David Simpson MP (Democratic Unionist, Upper Bann) Powers The full constitution and powers of the Committee are set out in House of Commons Standing Order No. 151 and House of Lords Standing Order No. 74, available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk/jcsi. Remit The Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments (JCSI) is appointed to consider statutory instruments made in exercise of powers granted by Act of Parliament. Instruments not laid before Parliament are included within the Committee's remit; but local instruments and instruments made by devolved administrations are not considered by JCSI unless they are required to be laid before Parliament. The role of the JCSI, whose membership is drawn from both Houses of Parliament, is to assess the technical qualities of each instrument that falls within its remit and to decide whether to draw the special attention of each House to any instrument on one or more of the following grounds: i. that it imposes, or sets the amount of, a charge on public revenue or that it requires payment for a licence, consent or service to be made to the Exchequer, a government department or a public or local authority, or sets the amount of the payment; ii. that its parent legislation says that it cannot be challenged in the courts; iii. that it appears to have retrospective effect without the express authority of the parent legislation; iv. that there appears to have been unjustifiable delay in publishing it or laying it before Parliament; v. that there appears to have been unjustifiable delay in sending a notification under the proviso to section 4(1) of the Statutory Instruments Act 1946, where the instrument has come into force before it has been laid; vi. that there appears to be doubt about whether there is power to make it or that it appears to make an unusual or unexpected use of the power to make; vii. that its form or meaning needs to be explained; viii. that its drafting appears to be defective; ix. or on any other ground which does not go to its merits or the policy behind it. The Committee usually meets weekly when Parliament is sitting. Publications The reports of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of both Houses. All publications of the Committee are available on the Internet from www.parliament.uk/jcsi. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Mick Hillyard (Commons Clerk), Kath Kavanagh (Lords Clerk) and Jacqueline Cooksey (Committee Secretary). Advisory Counsel: Peter Davis, Peter Brooksbank and Christine Cogger (Commons) and Peter Milledge (Lords). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments, Delegated Legislation Office, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general inquiries is: 020 7219 2830; the Committee's e–mail address is: [email protected]. 1 Contents Report Page Instruments reported 2 1 S.I. 2007/1949: reported for defective drafting 2 2 S.I. 2007/1971: reported for defective drafting 3 3 S.I. 2007/1972: reported for defective drafting 4 4 S.I. 2007/2003: reported for unexpectedly limited use of the enabling power 5 5 S.I. 2007/2068: reported for defective drafting 6 6 S.I. 2007/2317: reported for doubtful vires 6 Instruments not reported 8 Annex 9 Appendix 1 12 S.I. 2007/1949: memorandum from the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform 12 Appendix 2 13 S.I. 2007/1971: memorandum from the Office of the Gas and Electricity Markets Authority 13 Appendix 3 14 S.I. 2007/1972: memorandum from the Office of the Gas and Electricity Markets Authority 14 Appendix 4 15 S.I. 2007/2003: memorandum from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 15 Appendix 5 16 S.I. 2007/2068: memorandum from HM Revenue and Customs 16 Appendix 6 17 S.I. 2007/2317: memorandum from the Ministry of Justice 17 2 Instruments reported At the Committee’s meeting on 24 October 2007, it scrutinised a number of instruments and decided to draw the special attention of both Houses to six of them in accordance with its Standing Orders. The Instruments and the grounds for reporting them are given below. Relevant Departmental memoranda are published as appendices to this report. 1 S.I. 2007/1949: reported for defective drafting European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation Regulations 2007 (S.I. 2007/1949) 1.1 The Committee draws the special attention of both Houses to these Regulations on the ground that they are defectively drafted in one respect. 1.2 These Regulations make provision supplementing Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006, which provides for the creation of a new form of body corporate: the European grouping of territorial cooperation (“EGTC”). An EGTC is a body whose members comprise public bodies from more than one Member State. 1.3 Regulation 8 of this instrument provides that a UK EGTC may not be formed with a member which has limited liability. “UK EGTC” is defined in regulation 2(1) as an EGTC which has its registered office in the United Kingdom 1.4 Regulation 4(1) requires the statutes of a UK EGTC to be published in the London, Edinburgh or Belfast Gazette according to whether its registered office is in England and Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland. Regulation 4(2) states that “this regulation is subject to regulation 8”. 1.5 In a memorandum printed at Appendix 1, the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform states that the process of formation of a UK EGTC includes the essential step of publication of statutes in the Gazette under regulation 4, and since statutes of a UK EGTC with a member which has limited liability may not be published under regulation 4 because of regulation 8, regulation 4 is subject to regulation 8. 1.6 The Committee cannot agree. What the Department appears to ignore is the fact that there can, by definition, be no such thing as a UK EGTC one of whose members has limited liability. Regulation 8 is a free-standing provision which limits the range of bodies which may become a UK EGTC, but it does not in any way qualify the publication requirements of regulation 4(1), which only apply if a body is in fact a UK EGTC. Regulation 4(1) is therefore not subject to regulation 8, and regulation 4(2) is otiose. The Committee accordingly reports the inclusion of regulation 4(2) for defective drafting. 3 2 S.I. 2007/1971: reported for defective drafting Gas (Applications for Licences and Extensions and Restrictions of Licences) Regulations 2007 (S.I. 2007/1971) 2.1 The Committee draws the special attention of both Houses to these Regulations on the ground that they are defectively drafted in two respects. 2.2 Regulation 3(3)(a) of this instrument provides that, unless the context otherwise requires, any reference to a numbered regulation or Schedule is a reference to the regulation or Schedule bearing that number in these Regulations. 2.3 In a memorandum printed at Appendix 2, the Office of the Gas and Electricity Markets Authority (“Ofgem”) acknowledges that there is no reference to a numbered regulation in the text of the instrument and that the inclusion of “any reference to a numbered regulation” is superfluous, and undertakes to amend regulation 3(3)(a) at the next opportunity. It points out that there is a reference in a footnote to the instrument to Schedule 6 of the Utilities Act 2000, but the Committee notes that there is no reference to a numbered Schedule in the text of the instrument. Regulation 3(3)(a) as a whole is therefore otiose and ought not to have been included, and the Committee accordingly reports regulation 3(3)(a) for defective drafting, acknowledged in part by Ofgem. 2.4 The Committee would also observe that both sub-paragraphs (a) and (b) (which provides that, unless the context otherwise requires, any reference to a numbered paragraph is a reference to the paragraph bearing that number in the regulation in which the reference appears) of regulation 3(3) merely restate what is a generally accepted principle of statutory interpretation.
Recommended publications
  • Changing Mental Health Legislation in the UK† Tony Zigmond

    Changing Mental Health Legislation in the UK† Tony Zigmond

    Advances in Psychiatric Treatment (2008), vol. 14, 81–83 doi: 10.1192/apt.bp.107.005116 Editorial Changing mental health legislation in the UK† Tony Zigmond Abstract Following devolution, the mental health acts of the constituent countries of the UK are diverging in their provisions. This editorial describes three significant differences between the new Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003, which came into effect in Scotland in 2005, and the Mental Health Act 2007 for England and Wales. Devolution, in relation to mental health law, has It has been argued that we should not have come of age. The Mental Health (Care and Treat- any separate mental health legislation and that ment) (Scotland) Act 2003 is very different both the mental capacity legislation, with perhaps from its forerunner in Scotland and from the Men- some additional safeguards, should be the basis tal Health Act 1983 for England and Wales, even as for all non-consensual treatment (Zigmond, 1998; amended by the Mental Health Act 2007. Should Szmukler & Holloway, 1998). The proposals for the report of the Bamford Review of the legislative Northern Ireland are in line with this approach. The framework in Northern Ireland (Bamford Review of College in England and Wales took the view, as had Mental Health and Learning Disability (NI), 2007) already been accepted in Scotland, that the criteria be accepted and turned into a mental health act then for determining capacity as set out in the Mental we will have a third, very distinct, piece of mental Capacity Act 2005 are too narrow for use with people health law with in the UK.
  • Lord Chief Justice Delegation of Statutory Functions

    Lord Chief Justice Delegation of Statutory Functions

    Delegation of Statutory Functions Lord Chief Justice – Delegation of Statutory Functions Introduction The Lord Chief Justice has a number of statutory functions, the exercise of which may be delegated to a nominated judicial office holder (as defined by section 109(4) of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (the 2005 Act). This document sets out which judicial office holder has been nominated to exercise specific delegable statutory functions. Section 109(4) of the 2005 Act defines a judicial office holder as either a senior judge or holder of an office listed in schedule 14 to that Act. A senior judge, as defined by s109(5) of the 2005 Act refers to the following: the Master of the Rolls; President of the Queen's Bench Division; President of the Family Division; Chancellor of the High Court; Senior President of Tribunals; Lord or Lady Justice of Appeal; or a puisne judge of the High Court. Only the nominated judicial office holder to whom a function is delegated may exercise it. Exercise of the delegated functions cannot be sub- delegated. The nominated judicial office holder may however seek the advice and support of others in the exercise of the delegated functions. Where delegations are referred to as being delegated prospectively1, the delegation takes effect when the substantive statutory provision enters into force. The schedule is correct as at 12 May 2015.2 The delegations are currently subject to review by the Lord Chief Justice and a revised schedule will be published later in 2015. 1 See Interpretation Act 1978, section 13. 2 The LCJ has on three occasions suspended various delegations in order to make specific Practice Directions.
  • Embedded Generation Connection Incentives for Distribution Network Operators

    Embedded Generation Connection Incentives for Distribution Network Operators

    EMBEDDED GENERATION CONNECTION INCENTIVES FOR DISTRIBUTION NETWORK OPERATORS Report Number: K/EL/00286/REP URN 02/1148 Contractor Ilex Energy Consulting Prepared by Peter Williams Stephen Andrews The work described in this report was carried out under contract as part of the DTI Sustainable Energy Programmes. The views and judgements expressed in this report are those of the contractor and do not necessarily reflect those of the DTI. First Published 2002 © Crown copyright Disclaimer While ILEX considers that the information and opinions given in this work are sound, all parties must rely upon their own skill and judgement when making use of it. ILEX does not make any representation or warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this report and assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of such information. ILEX will not assume any liability to anyone for any loss or damage arising out of the provision of this report. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION I 1. REVIEW OF THE EXISTING OBLIGATIONS ON DISTRIBUTION NETWORK OPERATORS 1 2. REVIEW OF DNO PRACTICE 9 3. INTRODUCTION OF THE UTILITIES ACT 2000 21 4. DNO INCENTIVES - PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS 36 ANNEX A: DNO QUESTIONNAIRE 60 [This page is intentionally blank] INTRODUCTION This is a final report on the work undertaken by ILEX on the ‘Connection Incentives for Distribution Network Operators’ project - commissioned by the DTI as part of the New and Renewable Energy Programme. This work covers the tasks of the project as described in the original proposal and subsequently formalised under contract between ILEX and ETSU1.
  • Scotland Act 2016 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 22 July 2021

    Scotland Act 2016 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 22 July 2021

    Status: Point in time view as at 01/12/2017. This version of this Act contains provisions that are not valid for this point in time. Changes to legislation: Scotland Act 2016 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 22 July 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) Scotland Act 2016 2016 CHAPTER 11 An Act to amend the Scotland Act 1998 and make provision about the functions of the Scottish Ministers; and for connected purposes. [23rd March 2016] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— PART 1 CONSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS The Scottish Parliament and the Scottish Government 1 Permanence of the Scottish Parliament and Scottish Government In the Scotland Act 1998 after Part 2 (the Scottish Administration) insert— “PART 2A PERMANENCE OF THE SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT AND SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT 63A Permanence of the Scottish Parliament and Scottish Government (1) The Scottish Parliament and the Scottish Government are a permanent part of the United Kingdom's constitutional arrangements. (2) The purpose of this section is, with due regard to the other provisions of this Act, to signify the commitment of the Parliament and Government of the United Kingdom to the Scottish Parliament and the Scottish Government.
  • Utilities Act 2000 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 25 September 2021

    Utilities Act 2000 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 25 September 2021

    Status: This version of this Act contains provisions that are prospective. Changes to legislation: Utilities Act 2000 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 25 September 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes Utilities Act 2000 2000 CHAPTER 27 PART I NEW REGULATORY ARRANGEMENTS 1 Gas and Electricity Markets Authority. (1) There shall be a body corporate to be known as the Gas and Electricity Markets Authority (in this Act referred to as “the Authority”) for the purpose of carrying out— (a) functions transferred to the Authority from the Director General of Gas Supply and the Director General of Electricity Supply; and (b) the other functions of the Authority under this Act. (2) The functions of the Authority are performed on behalf of the Crown. (3) The offices of Director General of Gas Supply and Director General of Electricity Supply are abolished. (4) Schedule 1 has effect with respect to the Authority. Commencement Information I1 S. 1 wholly in force at 1.10.2001; s. 1 not in force at Royal Assent see s. 110(2); s. 1(1)(2)(4) in force at 1.11.2000 by S.I. 2000/2917, art. 2; s. 1(3) in force at 1.10.2001 by S.I. 2001/3266, art. 2, Sch. (subject to transitional provisions in arts. 3-20) F12 Gas and Electricity Consumer Council.
  • THE RIGHTS and WRONGS of the PSYCHOPATH in CRIMINAL LAW: HOW MODERN SCIENCE MUST RESHAPE OLD POLICY. © Jasmine Nicolson* INTROD

    THE RIGHTS and WRONGS of the PSYCHOPATH in CRIMINAL LAW: HOW MODERN SCIENCE MUST RESHAPE OLD POLICY. © Jasmine Nicolson* INTROD

    THE RIGHTS AND WRONGS OF THE PSYCHOPATH IN CRIMINAL LAW: HOW MODERN SCIENCE MUST RESHAPE OLD POLICY. © Jasmine Nicolson* INTRODUCTION Psychopaths have long been enshrined in both popular culture and in law as the face of evil and danger;1 their classic characteristics of callousness, impulsivity, and remorselessness have helped to cement the conceptual link between psychopathy and violent crime.2 Psychiatrists from the 19th century, with all the equipment they had available at the time, made sweeping generalisations about the nature of the disorder. Pinel described patients who appeared without delusions or psychosis, as mentally unimpaired but engaged in impulsive acts of ‘instincte fureur’.3 Prichard built upon this definition to develop the concept of ‘moral insanity’. This term has evolved since its original intent – coming from the original French, ‘moral’ was taken to mean ‘emotional’ rather than ethical – and so the original ‘moral insanity’ was a ‘madness’ of emotional disposition and social ability, but without hallucinations or delusions.4 The concept has since evolved to include a lack of comprehension and appreciation of ethics and morality,5 but ultimately the M’Naghten rules in 1842 forged the legal defence of insanity, which required a clear presence of delusion, rather than a mere lack of morality.6 Both jurisdictions of England and Scotland have since built upon this to include an inability to 1 Cary Federman, Dave Holmes, and Jean Daniel Jacob, "Deconstructing the Psychopath: A Critical Discursive Analysis," Cultural Critique 72, no. 1 (2009). 2 Eric Silver, Edward P. Mulvey, and John Monahan, "Assessing Violence Risk among Discharged Psychiatric Patients: Toward an Ecological Approach," Law and Human Behavior 23, no.
  • Decision-Making Behaviour Under the Mental Health Act 1983 and Its Impact on Mental Health Tribunals: an English Perspective

    Decision-Making Behaviour Under the Mental Health Act 1983 and Its Impact on Mental Health Tribunals: an English Perspective

    laws Article Decision-Making Behaviour under the Mental Health Act 1983 and Its Impact on Mental Health Tribunals: An English Perspective Nicola Glover-Thomas ID School of Law, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; [email protected] Received: 21 February 2018; Accepted: 20 March 2018; Published: 24 March 2018 Abstract: In England and Wales, the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA 1983) provides the legal framework which governs decisions made concerning the care and treatment of those suffering from mental disorders, where they may pose a risk to themselves or others. The perspective of the patient and the care provider may conflict and can be a source of tension and challenge within mental health law. Through access to a mental health tribunal, patients are offered the apparatus to review and challenge their detention. With detention rates under the mental health legislation rising exponentially, this is having a knock-on effect upon tribunal application numbers. As there is a legal requirement to review all cases of individuals detained under the MHA 1983, understanding the key drivers for this increase in detention is essential in order to understand how to better manage both detention rates and the upsurge in tribunal caseloads. With the increase in overall activity, mental health tribunal workloads present significant practical challenges and has downstream cost implications. Keywords: detention; caseload; mental health tribunal; Mental Health Act 1983; decision-making; risk; costs 1. Introduction Mental illness costs the UK economy £100 billion a year (Johnson 2016; McCrone et al. 2008). In 2012, the Her Majesty’s (HM) Government spent £126 billion on health (HM Treasury 2011, p.
  • Case Study of the English Early Childhood Education and Care System

    Case Study of the English Early Childhood Education and Care System

    e Early h l Case Studies na of E A atio ar Trn ly d te Ch In il dh v o o d a E d u n c a t io t n a a n d g C a r e e S y s t e m s EvolvingResponsive a HarmonizedIntegrated Policymaking and Hybrid andUniversal Implementation:System of ECEC: Maintaining the Reform Momentum RespectingEarlyAFrom Careful Childhood Equality Children Balancing to Services:and Equity ActFamilies Using Data for Improvement HongSingaporeAustraliaEnglandFinland Kong Integrated and Universal Early Childhood Services: Using Data for Improvement A Case Study of the English Early Childhood Education and Care System Professor Kathy Sylva, Grace Murkett, and Beatriz Melendro October 5, 2018 CopyrightÓ 2018 Teachers College All rights reserved International Case Studies of Innovative Early Childhood Systems: England Contents Executive Summary 1 Part 1 Introduction 11 Chapter 1: Study Overview .......................................................................................................... 12 Rationale and Goals ................................................................................................................... 12 Study Architecture ..................................................................................................................... 14 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 20 Data Collection, Analysis, and Validation................................................................................ 24 Definitions and Abbreviations
  • Does Mental Health and Guardianship Legislation in Western Australia (WA

    Does Mental Health and Guardianship Legislation in Western Australia (WA

    Does mental health and guardianship legislation in Western Australia (WA) protect elderly persons from human rights abuse, and ensure procedural and substantive justice? Neville Francis Hills The University of Western Australia This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The University of Western Australia The work presented in this thesis was performed in the Law School 2016 Thesis: Doctor of Philosophy – Mental Health Law Declaration This is to certify that this thesis does not incorporate, without acknowledgement, any material previously submitted for a degree or diploma from any university and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, does not contain any material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the text. Signed Name Neville Francis Hills Date December 1, 2016 i Thesis: Doctor of Philosophy – Mental Health Law Abstract This thesis addresses matters affecting the liberty, rights and welfare of older people in Western Australia (WA). Restriction of personal liberty to choose where to live, and who to associate with, is usually only permitted under criminal law, following legal processes. Mental health legislation also permits restraints on freedom of individuals, subject to legal oversight of the process. Admission into an aged care facility may restrict a person’s liberty, if placed in a locked area which they cannot leave without staff assistance. Laws regulating these procedures should be fair, open to scrutiny, and meeting international standards of law and good practice. In 2015 there were 16,350 Commonwealth funded aged care beds in 263 facilities in WA.
  • Social Security Act 2000

    Social Security Act 2000

    c i e AT 5 of 2000 SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 2000 Social Security Act 2000 Index c i e SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 2000 Index Section Page 1 Application to the Island of Acts of Parliament etc ................................................... 5 1A Power to make other provision in respect of social security .................................... 6 2 Orders: supplemental provisions ................................................................................. 7 3 Interpretation ................................................................................................................... 7 4 Short title etc .................................................................................................................... 8 SCHEDULE 1 9 ACTS OF PARLIAMENT TO WHICH SECTION 1 APPLIES 9 SCHEDULE 2 11 ENACTMENTS REPEALED OR REVOKED 11 ENDNOTES 13 TABLE OF LEGISLATION HISTORY 13 TABLE OF RENUMBERED PROVISIONS 13 TABLE OF ENDNOTE REFERENCES 13 c AT 5 of 2000 Page 3 Social Security Act 2000 Section 1 c i e SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 2000 Received Royal Assent: 2 March 2000 Passed: 21 March 2000 Commenced: 21 March 2000 AN ACT to provide for the application to the Island of certain Acts of Parliament and statutory instruments relating to social security; and for connected purposes. 1 Application to the Island of Acts of Parliament etc (1) The Treasury may by order apply to the Island as part of the law of the Island, subject to such exceptions, adaptations and modifications as may be specified in the order, any legislation of the United Kingdom to which this
  • Criminal Justice Act 2003

    Criminal Justice Act 2003

    Criminal Justice Act 2003 CHAPTER 44 CONTENTS PART 1 AMENDMENTS OF POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1984 1 Extension of powers to stop and search 2 Warrants to enter and search 3 Arrestable offences 4 Bail elsewhere than at police station 5 Drug testing for under-eighteens 6 Use of telephones for review of police detention 7 Limits on period of detention without charge 8 Property of detained persons 9 Taking fingerprints without consent 10 Taking non-intimate samples without consent 11 Codes of practice 12 Amendments related to Part 1 PART 2 BAIL 13 Grant and conditions of bail 14 Offences committed on bail 15 Absconding by persons released on bail 16 Appeal to Crown Court 17 Appeals to High Court 18 Appeal by prosecution 19 Drug users: restriction on bail 20 Supplementary amendments to the Bail Act 1976 21 Interpretation of Part 2 iv Criminal Justice Act 2003 (c. 44) PART 3 CONDITIONAL CAUTIONS 22 Conditional cautions 23 The five requirements 24 Failure to comply with conditions 25 Code of practice 26 Assistance of National Probation Service 27 Interpretation of Part 3 PART 4 CHARGING ETC 28 Charging or release of persons in police detention 29 New method of instituting proceedings 30 Further provision about new method 31 Removal of requirement to substantiate information on oath PART 5 DISCLOSURE 32 Initial duty of disclosure by prosecutor 33 Defence disclosure 34 Notification of intention to call defence witnesses 35 Notification of names of experts instructed by defendant 36 Further provisions about defence disclosure 37 Continuing
  • Crime (International Co-Operation) Act 2003

    Crime (International Co-Operation) Act 2003

    Source: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/32 Crime (International Co-operation) Act 2003 2003 CHAPTER 32 An Act to make provision for furthering co-operation with other countries in respect of criminal proceedings and investigations; to extend jurisdiction to deal with terrorist acts or threats outside the United Kingdom; to amend section 5 of the Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981 and make corresponding provision in relation to Scotland; and for connected purposes. [30th October 2003] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— PART 1 MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS CHAPTER 1 MUTUAL SERVICE OF PROCESS ETC. Service of overseas process in the UK 1Service of overseas process (1)The power conferred by subsection (3) is exercisable where the Secretary of State receives any process or other document to which this section applies from the government of, or other authority in, a country outside the United Kingdom, together with a request for the process or document to be served on a person in the United Kingdom. (2)This section applies— (a)to any process issued or made in that country for the purposes of criminal proceedings, (b)to any document issued or made by an administrative authority in that country in administrative proceedings, (c)to any process issued or made for the purposes of any proceedings on an appeal before a court in that country against a decision in administrative proceedings, (d)to any document issued or made by an authority in that country for the purposes of clemency proceedings.