DOCSLIB.ORG

Compare Transit Survey Results to Actual Count Data, 9/2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Compare Transit Survey Results to Actual Count Data, 9/2010 22010010 SSpringpring PPnRnR RReporteport CCover.aiover.ai 3 111/4/20101/4/2010 44:33:03:33:03 PPMM C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Miami-Dade MetropolitanMetropolitan PlanningPlanning OrganizationOrganization CompareCompare TransitTransit SurveySurvey ResultsResults toto ActualActual CountCount DataData September 30, 2010 Compare Transit Survey Results to Actual Count Data Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Data Editing and Processing .......................................................................................................................... 2 Expansion Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 5 Control Count ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Expansion Factors ................................................................................................................................... 20 Survey Results‐Travel Characteristics ......................................................................................................... 34 Comparison of Expansion Methods ........................................................................................................ 34 Trip Purpose ............................................................................................................................................ 39 Auto Ownership ...................................................................................................................................... 40 Trip Purpose vs. Auto Ownership ........................................................................................................... 41 Access Mode ........................................................................................................................................... 44 Trip Purpose vs. Access Mode ................................................................................................................. 45 Access Mode vs. Auto Ownership ........................................................................................................... 48 Egress Mode ............................................................................................................................................ 51 Trip Purpose vs. Egress Mode ................................................................................................................. 52 Egress Mode vs. Auto Ownership ........................................................................................................... 55 Access Mode vs. Egress Mode ................................................................................................................ 58 Trip Length Distribution .......................................................................................................................... 60 Station to Station Origin‐Destination Matrix .......................................................................................... 62 Comparison with Fare Card Data ................................................................................................................ 66 Geocoding Results ....................................................................................................................................... 75 Rider Characteristics ................................................................................................................................... 83 Fare Type ................................................................................................................................................. 83 Frequency of Use .................................................................................................................................... 84 Residency Status ..................................................................................................................................... 85 Driver License .......................................................................................................................................... 86 Age .......................................................................................................................................................... 87 Race ......................................................................................................................................................... 88 Household Characteristics ...................................................................................................................... 89 Summary of Findings ................................................................................................................................... 92 Appendix A: Parking Lot Count Data ......................................................................................................... A‐1 Appendix B: Metrorail Survey Instrument ................................................................................................. B‐1 i | Miami‐Dade MPO Compare Transit Survey Results to Actual Count Data List of Tables Table 1: Number of Survey Discarded by Cleanup Step ............................................................................... 5 Table 2: AM Peak Period Fare Card Station‐Station Trip Matrix .................................................................. 7 Table 3: Off Peak Period Fare Card Station‐Station Trip Matrix ................................................................... 8 Table 4: PM Peak Period Fare Card Station‐Station Trip Matrix ................................................................... 9 Table 5: April 2009 Daily Average Boardings by Station ............................................................................. 15 Table 6: Boarding by Station, Time Period, Direction, and Number of Stations Traveled ......................... 16 Table 7: Scaled AM Peak Period Trip Table ................................................................................................. 17 Table 8: Scaled Off Peak Period Trip Table ................................................................................................. 18 Table 9: Scaled PM Peak Period Trip Table ................................................................................................. 19 Table 10: Number of Survey by Boarding Station, Time Period, Direction, and Number of Stations Traveled ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 Table 11: Expansion Factors for Method One ............................................................................................ 22 Table 12: Revised Expansion Factors for Method One ............................................................................... 23 Table 13: AM Peak Period Number of Survey by Boarding Station and Alighting Station ......................... 25 Table 14: Off Peak Period Number of Survey by Boarding Station and Alighting Station .......................... 26 Table 15: PM Peak Period Number of Survey by Boarding Station and Alighting Station .......................... 27 Table 16: AM Peak Period Expansion Factors for Method Two ................................................................. 28 Table 17: Revised AM Peak Period Expansion Factors for Method Two .................................................... 29 Table 18: Off Peak Period Expansion Factors for Method Two .................................................................. 30 Table 19: Revised Off Peak Period Expansion Factors for Method Two ..................................................... 31 Table 20: PM Peak Period Expansion Factors for Method Two .................................................................. 32 Table 21: Revised PM Peak Period Expansion Factors for Method Two .................................................... 33 Table 22: Comparison of Expanded Trip Purpose vs. Auto Ownership ...................................................... 38 Table 23: Distribution of Trip Purpose by Time Period ............................................................................... 39 Table 24: Distribution of Auto Ownership by Time Period ......................................................................... 40 Table 25: Peak Period Distribution of Trip Purpose Relative to Auto Ownership ...................................... 41 Table 26: Off Peak Period Distribution of Trip Purpose Relative to Auto Ownership ................................ 42 Table 27: Daily Distribution of Trip Purpose Relative to Auto Ownership ................................................. 43 Table 28: Access Mode Distribution by Time Period .................................................................................. 44 Table 29: Distribution of Peak Period Trip Purpose Relative to Access Mode ........................................... 45 Table 30: Distribution of Off Peak Period Trip Purpose Relative to Access Mode ..................................... 46 Table 31: Distribution of Daily Trip Purpose Relative to Access Mode....................................................... 47 Table 32: Distribution of Peak Period Auto Ownership Relative to Access Mode ..................................... 48 Table 33: Distribution of Off Peak Period Auto Ownership Relative to Access Mode
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On the Move... Miami-Dade County's Pocket
    Guide Cover 2013_English_Final.pdf 1 10/3/2013 11:24:14 AM 111 NW First Street, Suite 920 Miami, FL 33128 tel: (305) 375-4507 fax: (305) 347-4950 www.miamidade.gov/mpo C M On the Y CM MY Move... CY CMY K Miami-Dade County’s Pocket Guide to Transportation Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 4th Edition Table of Contents Highway Information Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) p. 1 FDOT’s Turnpike Enterprise p. 2 Florida Highway Patrol p. 2 95 Express Lanes p. 3 Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX) p. 4 SunPass® p. 5 511-SmarTraveler p. 5 Road Rangers p. 5 SunGuide® Transportation Management Center p. 6 Miami-Dade Public Works and Waste p. 7 Management Department Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) p. 8 Driving and Traffic Regulations p. 8 Three Steps for New Florida Residents p. 9 Drivers License: Know Before You Go p. 9 Vehicle Registration p. 10 Locations and Hours of Local DMV Offices p. 10-11 Transit Information Miami-Dade Transit (MDT) p. 12 Metrobus, Metrorail, Metromover p. 12 Fares p. 13 EASY Card p. 13 Discount EASY Cards p. 14-15 Obtaining EASY Card or EASY Ticket p. 15 Transfers p. 16-17 Park and Ride Lots p. 17-18 Limited Stop Route/Express Buses p. 18-19 Special Transportation Services (STS) p. 20 Special Event Shuttles p. 21 Tax-Free Transit Benefits p. 21 I Transit Information (Continued) South Florida Regional Transportation Authority p. 22 (SFRTA) / TriRail Amtrak p. 23 Greyhound p. 23 Fare & Schedule Information p. 24 Local Stations p.
    [Show full text]
  • Better Bus Network (Miami Beach)
    Better Bus Network (Miami Beach) The route maps include the following information: - Key Destinations: list of places/connections served by the respective transit route - Frequency: buses per hour, listed by peak and off peak and on weekdays and weekend days - Span of Service: time period of operation on weekdays and weekend days - Notes: relationship of proposed Better Bus routes to existing routes Better Bus Route 1 – Downtown to Aventura Mall Key Destinations: Bus Terminal at Aventura Mall, Downtown Miami, Miami Beach, Government Center Metrorail and Metromover station. Weekdays Weekends Peak Frequency 7.5/15 7.5/15 Sat 10/30 Sun Off Peak Frequency 7.5/15 Span of 24 hours 24 hours Service Note: Will serve same alignment as existing route 120 except for Omni terminal and stops north of 186 St in Sunny Isles Beach. All day frequency 7.5 min. to Haulover and 15 min. to Aventura. Better Bus Route 1 – Downtown to Aventura Mall (LL) Key Destinations: Bus Terminal at Aventura Mall, Downtown Miami, Miami Beach, Government Center Metrorail and Metromover station. Weekdays Weekends Peak Frequency 15 15 Sat 30 Sun Off Peak Frequency 15 Span of 24 hours 24 hours Service Note: Will serve same alignment as existing route 120 except for Omni terminal and stops north of 186 St in Sunny Isles Beach. Better Bus Route 1 – Downtown to Aventura Mall (SL) Key Destinations: Haulover, Downtown Miami, Miami Beach, Government Center Metrorail and Metromover station. Weekdays Weekends Peak Frequency 15 15 Sat 15 Sun Off Peak Frequency 15 Span of 4:00 AM to 5:00 AM to Service 12:00 AM 12:00 AM Note: Will serve same alignment as existing route 120 except for Omni terminal.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Committee Meeting
    Florida Housing Finance Corporation 7/20/12 Planning Committee 1. Review of development costs per unit 2. Funding of TODs 3. Demonstration of highest Florida job creation 4. Funding of & Preference for RA Levels 1-3 (Preservation) 5. Universal Design & Visitability Features 6. Resident Programs FHFC-Financed Developments Located Near MetroRail Stations in Miami-Dade County Station Name/Development Name Year Funded Units 2011 UAC Deals ranked for funding are highlighted Palmetto Station (0 applied) No existing developments within 0.5 miles Okeechobee Station (0 applied) No existing developments within 0.5 miles Hileah Station (0 applied) No existing developments within 0.5 miles Tri-Rail/MetroRail Station (0 applied) *Station Area overlaps with Northside No existing developments within 0.5 miles Northside Station (2 applied; 0 awarded) *Station area overlaps with Trirail/MetroRail No existing developments within 0.5 miles Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Station (0 applied) *Station area overlaps with Brownsville No existing developments within 0.5 miles Brownsville Rail Station (2 applied; 0 awarded) *Station area overlaps with Dr. MLK Jr. Everett Steward Sr. Village (E) 2007 96 Brownsville Transit Village II (E) 2008 100 Brownsville Transit Village III (E) 2010 103 Brownsville Transit Village IV (F) 2010 102 Mildred and Claude Pepper Towers (E-pres) 2005 150 Ward Tower Assisted Living Facility (E-ALF) 2005 100 Earlington Heights Station (7 applied; 0 awarded) *Station area overlaps with Allapattah Esmeralda Bay (E) 2010 96 Friendship Tower
    [Show full text]
  • 79Th Street Corridor Neighborhood Initiative (Redevelopment Plan)
    79TH STREET CORRIDOR NEIGHBORHOOD INITIATIVE 79TH STREET CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PLAN DECEMBER, 2003 ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONSTIONS............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................I ACKNOWLEDGMENTSWLEDGMENTS.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................III 1.0 INTRODUCTIONODUCTION..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 STUDY PURPOSE...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................1 1.2 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Transit Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study 1000 NW 111Th Avenue Miami, FL 33172
    FACT SHEET FM# 438076-1-22-01 SR 9 / SR 817 / NW 27th Avenue www.fdotmiamidade.com/27thAvenueRapidTransit Rapid Transit Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study 1000 NW 111th Avenue Miami, FL 33172 Like www.facebook.com/MyFDOTMiami Follow www.twitter.com/MyFDOT_Miami Subscribe www.youtube.com/user/MyFDOTMiami Stay Informed: On the Inside: Project Website: ► Project Overview and Limits www.fdotmiamidade.com/27thAvenueRapidTransit ► Study Objective Get Involved: ► What is Rapid Transit? Contact: ► Public Involvement Program FDOT Project Manager Joan Shen, Ph.D., P.E., PTOE ► Project Goals email: [email protected] ► Project Schedule telephone: 305.640.7557 ► Project Map Public Information Specialist Ann Pope email: [email protected] telephone: 305.321.6011 SR 9 / SR 817 / NW 27th Avenue Rapid Transit Corridor PD&E Study FACT SHEET Overview and Limits The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) is conducting a Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study for the implementation of rapid Project Goals transit along SR 9/SR 817/NW 27th Avenue (referred to as the NW 27th Avenue ► Maximize mobility by offering an alternate Corridor). The PD&E study limits are as follows and illustrated in the map below: transportation mode with competitive travel times, • NW 27th Avenue from NW 215th Street to NW 38th Street which improves the corridor’s people-carrying capacity. • SR 112 from NW 27th Avenue to the Miami Intermodal Center ► Enhance connectivity with local and other regional The NW 27th Avenue Corridor is one of six corridors that comprise the Strategic transit systems that improves transportation system Miami Area Rapid Transit (SMART) Plan as adopted by the Miami-Dade efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • Hillsborough Area Regional Transit (HART), Ybor Streetcar 4 System Description System Map Station Development Opportunity Summary Station Profiles
    TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NUMBER TWO£ INVENTORY OF FLORIDA STATION DEVELOPMENT SITES AND OPPORTUNITIES Enabling StaJion Area Development in Florida: Towards More Cost Effective Rail Transit Investment for Office of Public Transportation Florida Department ofTransportation 605 Suwanee Street (MS 26) Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NUMBER TWO: INVENTORY OF FLORIDA STATION DEVELOPMENT SITES AND OPPORTUNITIES Enabling Station Area Developnumt in Florida: Towards More Cost Effective Rail Transit Investment for Olfoce of Public Tnwponation Florida Depanment of Transportation 60S SuWOIUlM S~rnet (MS 26) Tallaluwcc, Florida 32399-0450 through Center for Urban Transportation Re•eareb College of Engineering, University of South Florida 4202 B. Fowler Avenue, ENB 100 Tampa, PL 33620·5350 (813) 974-3120, Fax (813) 974-5168 by Tnwit Solutions 4612 Evanston A venue North StanJe, WA 98103 (206) 632·3443, Fax (206) 632·3444 Email: [email protected] March 2000 Project Manager Ronald C. Sb<ck Pl'()ject Staff SooUPlaee TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Hillsborough Area Regional Transit (HART), Ybor Streetcar 4 System Description System Map Station Development Opportunity Summary Station Profiles JacksonviUe Transportation Authority (JTA), Skyway 30 System Description System Map Station Development Opportunity Summary Station Profiles Metro Dade Transit Agency (MDTA), Metrorail 48 System Description System Map Station Development Opportunity Summary Station Profiles Metro Dade Transit Agency (MDTA), Metromover 92 System Description System Map Station Development Opportunity Summary Station Profiles Tri County Commuter Railroad Authority, Tri Rail 100 System Description System Map Station Development Opportunity Summary Station Profiles Resources 138 INTRODUCTION Perspective. Station area development requires stations. With each new rail iransit system constructed in the United States, station area development appears to becoming a more important aspect of rail transit investment.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Move... Miami-Dade County Pocket Guide to Transportation
    111 NW First Street, Suite 920 Miami, FL 33128 tel: (305) 375-4507 fax: (305) 375-4950 www.miamidadetpo.org On the Move... Miami-Dade County’s Pocket Guide to Transportation Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) 5th Edition (Summer 2017) The Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) plays an active role in educating the public regarding the transportation resources available to them. This guidebook was specifically designed to assist the citizens and visitors of Miami- Dade County. We hope you find the “Miami-Dade County Pocket Guide to Transportation” a helpful informational resource for all of your transportation related needs. A copy of this directory is also available on the Miami-Dade TPO website at: www.miamidadetpo.org Table of Contents Transit Information Strategic Miami Area Rapid Transit (SMART) Plan p. 1 SMART Plan Matrix p. 2 SMART Plan Map p. 3 Department of Transportation and Public Works (DTPW)-Transit p. 4 Transit Watch p. 5 Go Mobile p. 5 Fares p. 6 EASY Card p. 6 Obtaining EASY Card or EASY Ticket p. 7 Discount EASY Cards p. 7 Transfers p. 9 Park and Ride Lots p. 10 Express Bus Routes p. 11 Limited Stop Routes p. 12 Tax-Free Transit Benefits p. 12 Special Transportation Services (STS) p. 13 Citizens’ Independent Transportation Trust p. 14 Municipal Transit Services p. 14 South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA) / Tri-Rail p. 19 Greyhound p. 20 Amtrak p. 21 Jitney Services p. 21 Highway Information Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) p. 22 Department of Transportation and Public Works (DTPW) p.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty City
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons Miami Dade County MPO Community Background Reports 1-1-2011 Liberty City Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/mpo_dade Recommended Citation "Liberty City" (2011). Miami Dade County. 69. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/mpo_dade/69 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the MPO Community Background Reports at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Miami Dade County by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Community Background Report Liberty City County Miami-Dade Boundaries North: Northwest 79th Street South: Northwest 36th Street West: Northwest 19th Avenue East: Northwest 7th Avenue Community Type Neighborhood History Liberty City is historic as the first black suburban neighborhood of the City of Miami. This neighborhood’s name comes from the Liberty Square Housing Project, which was built in the late 1930s. Reverend John E. Culmer and the Greater Miami Negro Civic League championed the development of this housing project to relieve overcrowding in Overtown. Public concern over the spread of influenza, yellow fever and small pox outside of the boundaries of Overtown and the urge to move blacks away from the expanding central business district contributed to the push to build new housing for blacks. The President Roosevelt’s Public Works Administration built the initial 34 apartment units on land between Northwest 62nd and 67th Streets along Northwest 14th Avenue. Unlike many housing units in Overtown, all of these apartments were equipped with indoor plumbing. Liberty City is served by four Metrorail stations: the Northside Station on Northwest 79th Street, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Gary Hack Professor of Urban Design Thesis Supervisor
    EVALUATING THE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL FOR INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION CENTERS USING THE MIAMI INTERMODAL CENTER (MIC) by Omar F. del Rio Bachelor of Architecture, Tulane University, 1987 Master of Architecture and Urban Design, Harvard University, 1991 and Donald R. Hackstaff Bachelor of Science, Business, University of Colorado, 1990 Submitted to the Department of Architecture and the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 1996 @ 1996 Omar del Rio and Donald Hackstaff All rights reserved The authors hereby grants MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies oft~i th is document in w ole or jppyt. Signature of Authors ' /1/ // Center for Real Estate August 1, 1996 Certified by Gary Hack Professor of Urban Design Thesis Supervisor Accepted by MAS SACH-USE TS INS Tu (U William C. Wheaton OF TECHNOLOGY Chairman Real Estate Development SEP 1 6 1996 Interdepartmental Degree Program in LIBRARIES R0fth Evaluating the Development Potential for Intermodal Transportation Centers Using the Miami Intermodal Center (MIC) by Omar F. del Rio and Donald R. Hackstaff Submitted to the Department of Architecture and the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 1996 ABSTRACT Our thesis is an evaluation of development potential, with the appropriate private-public participation and financing, for infrastructure projects, specifically intermodal centers. We are using the Miami Intermodal Center, and related projects, the East-West Corridor, and the expansion of the Miami International Airport, as the study model.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Located Within the Area Identified Below Which Has Been Designated
    2011 UNIVERSAL CYCLE - LOCAL GOVERNMENT VERIFICATION OF QUALIFICATION AS A TOD DEVELOPMENT Name of Development: __________________________________________________________ (Part III.A.1. of the 2011 Universal Cycle Application) Development Location: _______________________________________________________________________________ (At a minimum, provide the address assigned by the United States Postal Service, including the address number, street name and city, or if the address has not yet been assigned, provide (i) the street name, closest designated intersection and city if located within a city or (ii) the street name, closest designated intersection and county if located in the unincorporated area of the county.) The undersigned Local Government official certifies that the proposed Development (identified above) is located within the area identified below which has been designated by the Local Government planning agency in its comprehensive plan, land use plan, land development code, or zoning code as a Transit-Oriented Development, Transit Oriented Development District, Rapid Transit Zone, Transit Village, or Rapid Transit Development Impact Zone: Broward County: Deerfield Beach TOD , Sheridan Station TOD Miami-Dade County: Allapattah Station Dadeland South Metrorail Overtown Arena Station Brickell Station Douglas Rd. Station Santa Clara Station Brownsville Station Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Station South Miami Station Civic Center Station Earlington Heights Station Tri-Rail MetroRail Station Coconut Grove Station Government Center
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Annual Report of the Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization
    TP Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization 2017 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE MIAMI-DADE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION STRATEGIC MIAMI AREA SMART RAPID TRANSIT PLAN Photo courtesy of The Next Miami MiamiCentral Brightline Train Station Currently Under Construction #MiamiSMARTPlan Miami-Dade TPO 2017 Annual Report MIAMI-DADE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION GOVERNING BOARD CHAIRMAN VICE CHAIRMAN Esteban L. Bovo, Jr. Francis Suarez Miami-Dade County City of Miami The Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) Governing Board is comprised of 25 voting members representing a diverse Esteban L. Bovo, Jr. Francis Suarez governing body within Miami-Dade County, Chairman Vice Chairman Miami-Dade County City of Miami including the Miami-Dade Board of County Bruno A. Barreiro Juan Carlos Bermudez Jose “Pepe” Diaz Miami-Dade County City of Doral Miami-Dade County Commissioners, eight elected officials from municipalities with a population over 50,000 and four Governor appointees that represent the Miami- Dade Expressway Authority, Miami-Dade County School Board, a municipality representative, and a non-elected offi cial that resides in unincorporated Miami-Dade County. The Miami-Dade TPO Governing Board is Bruno A. Barreiro Jose “Pepe” Diaz Audrey M. Edmonson Oliver G. Gilbert, III Perla T.responsible Hantman for approving federally required Miami-Dade County Miami-Dade County Miami-Dade County City of Miami Gardens Miami-Dadetransportation School Board plans, as well as establishing the Audrey M. Edmonson Dan Gelber Oliver G. Gilbert III transportation vision for Miami-Dade County. Miami-Dade County City of Miami Beach City of Miami Gardens Carlos Hernandez Sally A. Heyman Barbara J. Jordan Smith Joseph Philip Levine City of Hialeah Miami-Dade County Miami-Dade County City of North Miami City of Miami Beach Perla T.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Development Plan ANNUAL Administrative Update
    September 2013 FY 2014 TO FY 2023 Transit Development Plan ANNUAL ADMINIstRatIVE UPDatE Miami-Dade Transit TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN ANNUAL UPDATE September 2013 TDP Annual Update Table of Contents Table of Contents S.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... S-1 S.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... S-1 S.2 OVERVIEW OF MIAMI-DADE TRANSIT SYSTEM............................................................. S-1 S.3 TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ............................................. S-1 S.4 MIAMI-DADE TRANSIT’S PAST YEAR’S ACCOMPLISHMENTS (2012)......................... S-2 S.4.1 Monitoring Program to Track Annual Performance of MDT Services ........ S-2 S.5 OPERATING SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS AND ADJUSTMENTS ................................... S-2 S.6 FY 2012 COMMITTED TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS .......................................................... S-3 S.7 MIAMI-DADE TRANSIT TEN YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FY 2014 - FY 2023 ....... S-3 S.7.1 2023 Recommended Service Plan ................................................................ S-3 S.8 FINANCIAL PLAN ................................................................................................................ S-5 S.8.1 Operating Budget ........................................................................................... S-5 S.8.2 Capital Budget...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]