MetroWest Water Supply Tunnel (604)

Project Purpose and Benefits

6 Contributes to improved public health 6 Fulfills a regulatory requirement 6 Extends current asset life 6 Improves system operability and reliability

To provide transmission redundancy for the ensuring reliable water delivery and providing sufficient hydraulic capacity to support the new Walnut Hill Water Treatment Plant and covered storage distribution facilities. This project consists of construction of a 17.6 mile deep rock tunnel from Shaft D in Marlborough to Shaft 5 of the City Tunnel in Weston, and to Shaft W, also in Weston, as well as the construction of a covered storage facility at Loring Road in Weston. Also includes construction of shafts and valve chambers for connections of Shaft 4 in Southborough and to the Norumbega Covered Storage facility.

Project History and Background

Provision of adequate transmission capacity is a critical component of MWRA’s Integrated Water Supply Improvement Program. MWRA's water delivery depends on a system of tunnels and aqueducts that transport water from the Quabbin and Wachusett Reservoirs to the distribution reservoirs in western metropolitan . The existing tunnels and aqueducts are deficient in several respects. First, the transmission system is unable to supply sufficient hydraulic capacity during peak flow periods, leading to pressure deficiencies in all high service areas during the summer months. Second, key sections of the transmission system, such as the Hultman Aqueduct and the Southborough Tunnel, rely on a single conduit. In the event of failure of any of the major transmission sections, the remaining waterworks system could not meet the demand for water.

Construction of the MetroWest Water Supply Tunnel and its extension to the Terminal Chamber will provide the critically needed minimum level of transmission redundancy for the Hultman Aqueduct. In the future, enhancements and improvements to the reliability of the City Tunnel and the City Tunnel Extension will be planned as part of the Metropolitan Tunnel Loop project. This will also enhance system maintenance by allowing each major supply conduit to be taken out of service for inspection, cleaning, and repair.

In June 1989, MWRA began engineering work on reconstruction of the . On May 9, 1990, the Board of Directors directed staff to put minimum effort into further study of the Sudbury Aqueduct reconstruction alternatives and maximum effort into study of the all-tunnel alternative. The advantages of tunneling included a large reduction in surface activities resulting in a reduced environmental impact, and the potential to obtain a large increase in water transmission capacity to enable the tunnel to supplant the Weston Aqueduct as well as provide redundancy to the Hultman Aqueduct. Other advantages included a higher pressure rating by constructing a tunnel deeper into rock, and the ability to construct along a straight line, reducing the overall length of the project by three miles.

In November 1990, the Board of Directors directed staff to eliminate the planned tunnel from Norumbega Reservoir to the in favor of connecting to Shaft 5 of the City Tunnel and to the eastern end of the Weston Aqueduct. The connection will allow the Weston Aqueduct and to be taken off-line and used only for emergency supply as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.

In December 1995, the Board of Director’s approved staff’s request to solicit bids on the first major construction contract of the MetroWest Tunnel project. In June 1996, a notice to proceed was issued on this contract, beginning the transition from design to construction of the project.

Program Elements

When completed, the MetroWest Tunnel will be 17.6 miles long with a 14-feet finished diameter. The first segment of the tunnel extends from the water treatment plant site at Walnut Hill on the Marlborough/Southborough line to Shaft 4 of the Hultman Aqueduct in Southborough. From there, the tunnel continues to a "WYE" connection east of Norumbega Reservoir, and continues east from the "WYE" to Shaft 5 of the City Tunnel and northward to the Weston Aqueduct Terminal Chamber. The tunnel depth varies from 200 to 500 feet below ground surface along the alignment.

Following start-up of the MetroWest Tunnel, the Hultman Aqueduct will be inspected and rehabilitated. Surface distribution facilities, including piping, valve chambers, and risers will connect the tunnel to the Hultman Aqueduct and local community services. Intermediate connections between the MetroWest Tunnel and the Hultman Aqueduct

Transmission 101 will permit operation of segments of either the aqueduct or the tunnel interchangeably, allowing flexibility in the maintenance of the two conduits.

Scope

Sub-phase Scope Study Study of the aqueduct/tunnel system to determine the best alternative to improve hydraulic capacity and create redundancy. Construction- Rehabilitation of the Siphon Pipe Bridge at the Weston Aqueduct which Sudbury Pipe experienced significant leakage. Bridge Design/EIR- Environmental impact report (EIR) process and design of the 17.5-mile long, 14- Tunnel- feet diameter tunnel. Construction support services, including environmental and Engineering safety compliance, claims assistance, contract administration, quality assurance Services During testing, and community relations. Construction (ESDC) Construction: Construction of the western portion of the tunnel and associated surface facilities. Western Tunnel Shaft E was constructed at the Sudbury Dam and a tunnel has been excavated 4.9 Segment – CP1 miles to Shaft D, located adjacent to the clear well of the Walnut Hill Water Treatment Plant (WHWTP). A riser shaft has been excavated to connect the tunnel to Southborough's Hosmer Pump Station and includes the surface piping facilities necessary to bring water from Wachusett. Construction: Construction of approximately 11.9 miles of tunnel between Southborough and Middle Tunnel Weston. Construction is staged from Shaft L, located at a sand and gravel pit in Segment – CP2 Framingham, where a permanent connection to the Hultman will be constructed. Along the alignment, four small-diameter shafts will be constructed for community connections to Framingham and Weston. The western reach of the Middle Tunnel Segment portion of the tunnel terminates at Shaft E. The eastern reach terminates at the "WYE" where it meets the East Tunnel Segment. Shafts NE and NW will be constructed on the northwest side of Norumbega Reservoir where surface work will include construction of valve chambers and surface piping to allow connections to the Hultman Aqueduct and Norumbega Reservoir. The design at Shaft N includes provisions for future connections to the Norumbega Covered Storage Facility and the proposed Metropolitan Tunnel Loop. Construction: Shaft 5A was excavated near the intersection of Route 128 and the Shaft 5A- CP3 Turnpike. Construction: Construction of the eastern portion of the tunnel. An approximately 4,400-feet Eastern Tunnel long, 12-feet finished diameter tunnel is being constructed from the Shaft 5A Segment – CP3A bottom through the “WYE” where it meets the Middle Tunnel Segment and on to Shaft W where a shaft connection to the Loring Road storage tanks will be made. Construction: Miscellaneous surface work to be grouped under one contract. At this time, there Surface Work – is no work assigned to this contract, as all earlier items have been included in other CP4 contracts. Construction: Massachusetts Highway Department (MHD) salt storage operations were relocated MHD Salt Sheds – from the Shaft 5A site to a new, nearby location on MHD property on Recreation CP5 Road in Weston. This allowed demolition of the MHD salt sheds at the Shaft 5A site. Construction: Full inspection and partial rehabilitation of the Hultman Aqueduct along with Hultman construction of interconnections from the MetroWest Tunnel to the Hultman Interconnection/ Aqueduct at Shafts L, 5A, N, and E, and the connection between Norumbega Inspection/ Covered Storage and the Hultman. Rehabilitation – CP6

Transmission 102 Construction: Pressure testing of the MWWST from Shaft E (west) to Shaft W and 5A, and Testing and disinfection and dechlorination of the entire tunnel from Shaft D to Shafts W and Disinfection – CP7 5A, and final disinfection of Norumbega Covered Storage tanks. Also includes the disinfection and dechlorination of the and the piping connections through Walnut Hill to MetroWest Shaft D. Construction: Construction of surface facilities at the Shaft W site including a 20 million-gallon Loring Road storage facility that replaces the function of the existing Weston Aqueduct/Weston Covered Storage- Reservoir system, allowing the system to be taken off-line and placed on CP8 emergency stand-by status. The storage facility has been constructed as two concrete tanks partially buried in a hillside adjacent to Shaft W. Connections will be made under this contract at Shaft W to two WASM (1 and 2) low service mains and the WASM 4 high service main, as well as to the 7-feet diameter branch of the Hultman Aqueduct. Also includes rehabilitation of 4,100 linear feet of 60-inch pipe and four master meters. Construction Full inspection of all construction activity, as well as provision of construction Management/ support services including environmental and safety compliance, claims assistance, Resident contract administration, quality assurance testing, community relations, labor Inspection relations, engineering services during construction, and provision of technical assistance. Hultman Study Risk analyses to determine which leaks should be repaired now and a monitoring plan for leaks which presently do not threaten the integrity of the aqueduct. Hultman Leak Test pit excavation and leak repair on the Hultman Aqueduct. Repair Hultman Evaluation of various segments of the Hultman Aqueduct and installation of repair Investigation and bands at major leak sites. Repair Hultman Repair Purchase of external repair bands to be installed as part of Hultman investigation Bands and repair. Hultman Rehab - New sub-phase for replacement/repair of air relief structures, blow off's, culverts CP9 beneath the aqueduct, replacement of existing valves within structures, and additional items to restore the aqueduct to safe and efficient operation after 60 years of service without an overhaul. Professional Services such as construction safety, contractor audit, legal services, risk Services management consulting services, and other miscellaneous services. Framingham MOU Agreement to mitigate the impacts of the construction on the City of Framingham. Weston MOU Agreement to mitigate the impacts of the construction on the Town of Weston. Southborough Agreement to mitigate the impacts of the construction on the Town of MOU Southborough. Local Water Design and implementation of a Water Supply Contingency Plan including the Supply installation of new local mains where residential well supplies could be affected by Contingency tunnel construction. Design/CA/RI and Construction Community Funds to assist communities with the redesign of utility plans. Technical Assistance Owner Controlled Owner controlled insurance program providing workers’ compensation, general Insurance liability, and pollution liability insurance for MetroWest construction. Hultman Final design, construction, administration, and resident inspection of the Interconnect interconnections between the MetroWest Water Supply Tunnel and the Hultman Rehab Aqueduct as well as preliminary inspection and design of the rehabilitation of the aqueduct after it has been taken off-line. Interim New subphase added for temporary disinfection related to CP-7 subphase. Will Disinfrection include P.O. for chemicals and maintenance.

Transmission 103 Expenditure Forecast (in $000s)

Projected Payments Remaining FY FY FY FY FY Beyond Total Cost thru FY03 Balance 04 05 06 07 08 FY08

$654,579 $615,421 $39,158 $6,249 $11,960 $10,259 $4,136 $456 $6,096

Changes to Project Cost and Schedule

Total Project Cost ($000s) Schedule: Projected Completion Date

FY03 FY04 Change FY03 FY04 Change

$648,169 $654,579 $6,410 Sep 2010 Sep 2010 None

Explanation of Changes:

S Budget increase primarily as a result of a Design/EIR amendments for CP6 in addition to concrete underruns being less than anticipated on Middle Tunnnel CP2 and Testing and Disinfection cost incurred to dispose of test water along the length of the tunnel. These increases were partially offset by decreases to CP1 West Tunnel where potential concrete underruns are projected to be greater than original estimates.

CEB Impact

Incremental CEB Cost

FY04 FY05 FY06 Description FY05 is less than previous year because it does not include the $0 $51,522 ($32,373) truck and fit-out costs. Decrease in FY06 due to additional year of reduced chemical needs.

Transmission 104 Sluice Gate Rehabilitation (601)

Project Purpose and Benefits

6 Contributes to improved public health 6 Provides environmental benefits 6 Extends current asset life 6 Improves system operability and reliability

This project will improve the condition of and access to sluice gates used to regulate the release of water from upstream reservoirs and streams via aqueducts in accordance with legislative and flood control requirements. Motorized gates will replace manual gates and 12 facilities will be rehabilitated at , Framingham Reservoir, Spot Pond, and various locations along the Sudbury Aqueduct.

Project History and Background

MWRA operates and maintains sluice gates and facilities that house the gates at reservoirs and aqueducts throughout the waterworks system. The existing gates are typically 80 to 100 years old, are in poor condition, and must be operated by hand. In a Dam Safety Inspection Report by the Army Corps of Engineers, the sluice gates at and the four Sudbury System Reservoirs were cited as needing repairs to restore operability for flood control use. Failure to make repairs could lead to the Corps downgrading dam safety assessments at these sites. In addition, the structural condition of some of the facilities is such that they are unsafe for access by MWRA personnel for operation and maintenance purposes. To prevent further deterioration and to ensure safe access to and reliable operation of the sluice gates, MWRA is rehabilitating the facilities in conjunction with the replacement of the gates.

Design for Phase 2 rehabilitation began in April 1998. The design is 100% complete and includes input from the Boston Landmark Commission Order of Conditions and the Massachusetts Historical and Chestnut Hill Historical Commissions.

Scope

Sub-phase Scope Design/CS/RI and Design and construction of the installation of motorized operators, upgrade of the gate Construction 1 houses, and replacement of gates and sliding tracks at Sudbury Reservoir, Spot Pond, and Framingham Reservoir 3. Design and Design and construction of stop planks at all sites required to de-water the wet wells before Construction – the sluice gates can be installed. Stop Planks Design/CS/RI 2 Design, construction services, and resident inspection for Phase 2. Construction 2 Installation of motorized operators, upgrade of 10 gatehouses, and replacement of 30 gates at various distribution reservoirs. Construction – Payment to the MDC for construction of new toe drains, filter blanket, and pressure relief Sudbury Toe Drain wells, repair or abandonment of existing toe drains, and repair of the stone masonry Repair spillway, dam crest roadway, gate house, and wing walls at the Sudbury Dam.

Expenditure Forecast (in $000s)

Projected Payments Remaining FY FY FY FY FY Beyond Total Cost thru FY03 Balance 04 05 06 07 08 FY08

$9,400 $4,616 $4,784 $2,436 $2,310 $38 $0 $0 $0

Transmission 105 Changes to Project Cost and Schedule

Total Project Cost ($000s) Schedule: Projected Completion Date

FY03 FY04 Change FY03 FY04 Change

$9,235 $9,400 $165 Mar 2005 Mar 2005 None

Explanation of Changes:

S Budget increase reflects amendment for contract extension.

Transmission 106 Metropolitan Tunnel Loop (614)

Project Purpose and Benefits

6 Contributes to improved public health 6 Provides environmental benefits 6 Extends current asset life

To evaluate the need for and means of providing redundancy for the City Tunnel, the Dorchester Tunnel, and the City Tunnel Extension in order to ensure reliable transmission capability and allow for inspection, maintenance, and repair of these facilities. Current plans for full redundancy recommend a closed loop tunnel system, as originally planned in 1936 by the system's designers, created by constructing a 16.5-mile deep rock tunnel from Norumbega Reservoir in Weston to Fells Reservoir and the City Tunnel Extension. A supplemental or alternative plan would be a tunnel loop from Norumbega Reservoir to Blue Hills Reservoir and the Dorchester Tunnel (southern tunnel loop). Because this study will examine both northern and southern routes as well as other alternatives and incremental levels of redundancy, it has been designated the Metropolitan Tunnel Loop.

Project History and Background

When the pressure aqueduct system was planned in 1936, it was envisioned that within the metropolitan area the tunnel would be configured as a loop consisting of several segments so that any section could be deactivated while the others remained in service. This tunnel system was initially to have a northern loop and ultimately a southern loop.

The City Tunnel and the City Tunnel Extension have no high service backup facilities other than the Gillis Pump Station, and these tunnels cannot be removed from service for inspection, maintenance, or repair. In conjunction with the Sudbury Aqueduct and the Chestnut Hill Pump Station, major high service transmission mains along the Dorchester Corridor (Southern Spine) do provide partial backup for the Dorchester Tunnel. Critical isolation valves cannot currently be exercised to keep them in good working order. The many appurtenances that connect the tunnel shafts to the surface piping are now 30- to 40-years old and will become more prone to malfunction with increasing age. Failures of critical appurtenances could necessitate a tunnel shut down with a possible disruption of water service over a wide area.

Although the Chestnut Hill Connecting Mains project, the Shaft 7 to WASM 3 pipeline project, the rehabilitation of the Southern Spine mains, and the rehabilitation of WASM 3 and 4 will provide partial redundancy, the Metropolitan Tunnel Loop is necessary to create total redundancy for the City Tunnel, the City Tunnel Extension, the Dorchester Tunnel, and WASM 3. In addition, the northern portion of the tunnel loop would reduce pumping costs to the Fells Reservoir and the Northern Extra High and Intermediate High areas. With this portion of the tunnel loop in operation, WASM 3 could function as a distribution main, carrying water from the tunnel to the community meters and MWRA pumping stations. A new pumping station on the southern portion of the loop would provide improved service to the Southern Extra High Service Area.

Scope

Sub-phase Scope Feasibility Examination of the need for a metropolitan tunnel loop, evaluation of the practicality of Study/Survey construction of the tunnel in phases to improve system reliability, and evaluation of other system improvements to provide partial system redundancy. Design/CA/RI and Design and construction of shaft piping rehabilitation and testing for shafts 6, 9, 9A, 7C, construction of and 7D. Shaft Rehabilitation Tunnel Shaft Shaft piping rehabilitation and testing for shafts 6, 9, 9A, 7C, and 7D. Rehabilitation

Transmission 107 Expenditure Forecast (in $000s)

Projected Payments Remaining FY FY FY FY FY Beyond Total Cost thru FY03 Balance 04 05 06 07 08 FY08

$2,900 $0 $2,900 $10 $200 $161 $75 $575 $1,880

Changes to Project Cost and Schedule

Total Project Cost ($000s) Schedule: Projected Completion Date

FY03 FY04 Change FY03 FY04 Change

$2,693 $2,900 $207 Jun 2010 Jun 2010 None

Explanation of Changes:

S Budget change as a result of adjustment to December 2003 dollars for contracts scheduled for award after FY04.

Transmission 108 Chicopee Valley Aqueduct Redundancy (615)

Project Purpose and Benefits

6 Contributes to improved public health 6 Extends current asset life 6 Improves system operability and reliability

To provide redundancy for water service for the three communities supplied by the Chicopee Valley Aqueduct (CVA) in case of a CVA failure or shutdown.

Project History and Background

The Chicopee Valley Aqueduct (CVA) supplies water to Chicopee, Wilbraham, and South Hadley Fire District No. 1. The 48-inch and 36-inch diameter aqueduct was built in 1949 of reinforced concrete pipe with an embedded steel cylinder. It is the only means of supplying these communities with water. The capacity of the aqueduct is 23 million gallons per day, which is sufficient to meet the communities peak summer demand. It is currently not possible to perform routine maintenance without disrupting supply to these communities. However, if supply through the CVA is shut off upstream of Nash Hill Reservoir, Chicopee would be without water after two days, and South Hadley and Wilbraham would be without water even sooner. If the CVA were shut off downstream of Nash Hill Reservoir, Chicopee would be immediately disconnected from the CVA supply.

New construction under this project consists of a 9,000 feet long second barrel of the CVA from Nash Hill Reservoir to Chicopee of 30- to 36-inch diameter pipe and connections to South Hadley and Wilbraham from Nash Hill constructed of 16- to 20-inch pipe. With these new connections in place, the three communities will be connected to either , Nash Hill Reservoir, or both in the event of a failure anywhere along the length of the aqueduct. Construction also includes rehabilitation of the Bondsville throttling station.

To address the upstream failure scenario, MWRA is implementing emergency response plans that include having spare materials on hand and quick access to a contractor to expedite repairs. This project will complement that effort by providing additional mainline valves along the aqueduct that will help isolate manageable segments of the CVA; and by rehabilitating appurtenances such as meters, air valves, and blow-off valves. CVA meter connection improvements will be made for Wilbraham and South Hadley such that, in the event of an emergency, supply can be maintained from either Quabbin or Nash Hill Reservoir by isolating the damaged downstream or upstream section of the aqueduct for repair.

Scope

Sub-phase Scope Pipeline In-house planning of redundant pipelines and aqueducts for Chicopee, South Hadley Fire Redundancy – District # 1, and Wilbraham, and Bondsville construction. Planning Pipeline Design, construction administration, resident inspection, and construction for CVA Redundancy – redundancy facilities. Design and Construction Governor Chamber Rehabilitation of existing CVA appurtenances including the Bondsville throttling station, Construction pressure reducing and pressure relief chambers on Route 21, air valves, blow-offs, access (Chapter 149) manholes, and side connections. Completion of hydraulic and surge analysis for the CVA system. Construction Subphase added for property easements. easements*

Town fire tanker Subphase added for fire tanker truck access links alone the line. access

*New Subphase in Bold.

Transmission 109 Expenditure Forecast (in $000s)

Projected Payments Remaining FY FY FY FY FY Beyond Total Cost thru FY03 Balance 04 05 06 07 08 FY08

$8,493 $1,367 $7,126 $4,140 $2,986 $0 $0 $0 $0

Changes to Project Cost and Schedule

Total Project Cost ($000s) Schedule: Projected Completion Date

FY03 FY03 Change FY03 FY04 Change

$7,963 $8,493 $530 Apr 2005 Sep 2005 5 mos.

Explanation of Changes:

S Budget change as a result of adjustment to December 2003 dollars for contracts scheduled for award after FY04. S Schedule extended five months due to cover warranty period.

Transmission 110 Quabbin Transmission Rehabilitation (616)

Project Purpose and Benefits

6 Provides environmental benefits 6 Extends current asset life 6 Improves system operability and reliability

To inspect, assess, and rehabilitate the aging Quabbin Tunnel. The hydraulic control facilities of the Quabbin Tunnel are 70 to 80 years old and badly in need of renewal and upgrade. This is one of six projects that will upgrade the older working parts of the aqueduct-tunnel system and improve its interconnections with the distribution piping systems they supply. Based on the findings and recommendations of this inspection phase, design and construction phases will be added to the project at a later date.

Project History and Background

The Quabbin Tunnel was constructed in two phases. The first, the Wachusett-Colebrook Tunnel, was constructed in the 1920s to permit diversion of flow from the Ware River to Wachusett Reservoir. The remainder of the tunnel and the Quabbin Reservoir were constructed in the 1930s. Hydraulic facilities associated with the tunnel are 70 to 80 years old and badly in need of renewal and upgrade. This new project is for the inspection of the major components of the Quabbin Transmission System to assess existing conditions, determine the reliability of the system operation, identify needs for improvements and repairs, provide cost estimates, and dedicated controls for remote monitoring and operation. Final report is due in 2004 with design and construction phases to be added as improvements are identified.

Scope

Sub-phase Scope Facilities Assessment of existing conditions; update of infrastructure rehabilitation evaluation; Inspection identification of improvements/repairs/upgrades including instrumentation and controls for remote monitoring and operation; establishment of priorities for repairs and preparation of cost estimates.

Expenditure Forecast (in $000s)

Projected Payments Remaining FY FY FY FY FY Beyond Total Cost thru FY03 Balance 04 05 06 07 08 FY08

$1,050 $0 $1,050 $250 $500 $300 $0 $0 $0

Changes to Project Cost and Schedule

Total Project Cost ($000s) Schedule: Projected Completion Date

FY03 FY04 Change FY03 FY03 Change

$1,050 $1,050 $0 Mar 2005 Dec 2005 9 mos.

Explanation of Changes:

S Delay due to staff availability and project priorities.

Transmission 111 Sudbury and Weston Aqueduct Inspection (617)

Project Purpose and Benefits

6 Contributes to improved public health 6 Extends current asset life 6 Improves system operability and reliability

Study, design, and implementation of repairs to the Sudbury and Weston Aqueducts. These backup systems are both more than 100 years old, and need to be ready for emergency use.

Project History and Background

This project includes the inspection of the Sudbury and Weston Aqueducts in preparation for future repairs. These aqueducts are 120 and 100 years old, respectively and are in need of renewal and upgrade. They are critical back-up facilities for the City Tunnel and the Sudbury Reservoir emergency supply. The project will start with an inspection phase. Construction phases will be added later. The Sudbury Aqueduct would be inspected first, followed by the Weston. The inspections will identify the need for follow-up work such as repair of aqueduct walls, stream crossings, blow-offs, and waste weirs in addition to securing access to hatches and buildings.

Scope

Sub-phase Scope Sudbury and Inspection of the Sudbury and Weston Aqueducts to identify future repair work Weston Aqueduct Inspection

Expenditure Forecast (in $000s)

Projected Payments Remaining FY FY FY FY FY Beyond Total Cost thru FY03 Balance 04 05 06 07 08 FY08

$622 $300 $322 $0 $250 $72 $0 $0 $0

Changes to Project Cost and Schedule

Total Project Cost ($000s) Schedule: Projected Completion Date

FY03 FY04 Change FY03 FY04 Change

$599 $622 $23 Dec 2006 Dec 2006 None

Explanation of Changes:

S Budget change as a result of adjustment to December 2003 dollars for contracts scheduled for award after FY04.

Transmission 112 Northern High NW Trans Section 70-71 (618)

Project Purpose and Benefits

6 Contributes to improved public health 6 Extends current asset life 6 Improves system operability and reliability

Rehabilitation of 46,000 sq.ft. of pipeline serving the northwest.

Project History and Background

The northern high system operates some of the MWRA’s oldest pipeline. Sections 70 and 71 serve the northwest and the 46,000 sq.ft. is in poor condition and these steel pipelines are in need of repair.

Scope

Sub-phase Scope Easements Project easements. Planning, Design Planning, Design and rehabilitation of 46,000 sq.ft. of steel pipeline. CA/RI and Construction

Expenditure Forecast (in $000s)

Projected Payments Remaining FY FY FY FY FY Beyond Total Cost thru FY03 Balance 04 05 06 07 08 FY08

$35,820 $0 $35,820 $0 $0 $0 $500 $2,446 $32,874

Changes to Project Cost and Schedule

Total Project Cost ($000s) Schedule: Projected Completion Date

FY03 FY04 Change FY03 FY04 Change

$0 $35,820 $35,820 Nov 2016 NA

Explanation of Changes:

S New project added to FY04-06 CIP.

Transmission 113 Winsor Dam Hydroelectric (597)

Project Purpose and Benefits

6 Extends current asset life 6 Results in a net reduction in operating costs

To license and rehabilitate the turbine generator at the Winsor Dam in Belchertown to allow the dam to produce hydroelectric power to be used to sell to the electric grid, or to potentially wheel power to other MWRA facilities.

Project History and Background

Winsor Dam impounds the Quabbin Reservoir. At the dam, an intake feeds two conduits that are interconnected at a powerhouse below the dam. One conduit discharges to the Chicopee Valley Aqueduct; the other conduit feeds a hydroelectric turbine/generator unit that is inoperative due to a fire in 1991 that destroyed the electrical switchgear. A bypass valve at the Winsor powerhouse also allows flow to be discharged directly to the Swift River.

Around the time that the fire occurred, hydropower re-development was not a priority given the low value of energy and the capital costs of station rehabilitation (in addition to switchgear replacement, turbine/generator repairs were also required). Another factor that forestalled hydropower development was that the Winsor dam hydroelectric facilities were never licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Shortly before the fire occurred, FERC directed MWRA to license the facilities. Given that the Swift River hosts a valued trout fishery, fishery concerns promised to complicate an already onerous federal licensing process.

Efforts to rehabilitate the Winsor hydropower facilities began in 1995 when MWRA obtained a preliminary permit from FERC, the first step in the FERC process. The FERC preliminary permit secures the applicant a priority position to file a license application for development - it does not authorize development, however. The permit's conditions required MWRA to consult with resource agencies and to conduct environmental and engineering studies to assess the project's feasibility and to support a license application. Therefore, MWRA consulted with resource agencies and conducted a number of environmental studies required for a license application. Some specialized fisheries studies were conducted by a consultant; various other studies were prepared in-house by MWRA with assistance from MDC staff.

Engineering and economic feasibility studies and concept design were also required to develop information to satisfy FERC's license requirements and to develop preliminary cost information to support financial analysis and decisions regarding whether or not to proceed with hydropower re-development. Accordingly, in 1997, MWRA procured the services of Duke Engineering and Services (DE&S) to conduct certain technical evaluations.

The first phase of work was completed in mid-1998. DE&S evaluated two alternatives for redeveloping Winsor Dam hydropower facilities. The study found that it would be feasible to 1) rehabilitate the existing turbine/generator; or 2) install a new turbine generator that would operate at higher efficiencies due to modern technology and a design optimized for minimum flow conditions and 24-hour/day operations. Estimated capital costs (in 1998) of Alternatives 1 and 2 were $600,000 and $1,100,000 respectively. DE&S estimated costs did not include costs associated with SCADA and automation. At the time, MWRA did not direct DE&S to proceed with Concept Design (Phase 2 of the contracted services). This was due in large part to MWRA's desire to more carefully consider and test new reservoir operating scenarios to maximize water quality.

Subsequently, capital spending on the project has been deferred until 2011 as part of the plan to keep the budget within the CIP spending cap.

Transmission 114 Scope

Sub-phase Scope Preliminary Permit Study to determine project feasibility. Study Licensing and Licensing and detail design for hydropower at the Winsor Dam. Work will include Detail Design replacing switchgear, controls, and turbines. (potentially by design/builder) Construction Replacement or refurbishment of the hydroelectric generator.

Expenditure Forecast (in $000s)

Projected Payments Remaining FY FY FY FY FY Beyond Total Cost thru FY03 Balance 04 05 06 07 08 FY08

$783 $53 $730 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $730

Changes to Project Cost and Schedule

Total Project Cost ($000s) Schedule: Projected Completion Date

FY03 FY04 Change FY03 FY04 Change

$731 $783 $52 Nov 2012 Nov 2012 None

Explanation of Changes:

S Budget change as a result of adjustment to December 2003 dollars for contracts scheduled for award after FY04.

CEB Impact

Construction of the facility may either generate revenues from the sale of power or reduce the power purchased to run MWRA facilities. Initial estimates are $100,000 to $160,000 annually.

Transmission 115