In the Matter of an Arbitration Under Chapter Eleven of the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Uncitral Arbitration Rules

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In the Matter of an Arbitration Under Chapter Eleven of the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Uncitral Arbitration Rules Bilcon v. The Government of Canada Amended Statement of Defence December 18th, 2009 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES BETWEEN: WILLIAM RALPH CLAYTON, WILLIAM RICHARD CLAYTON, DOUGLAS CLAYTON, DANIEL CLAYTON, AND BILCON OF DELAWARE, INC. Claimants and GOVERNMENT OF CANADA Respondent AMENDED STATEMENT OF DEFENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA STATEMENT OF DEFENCE: May 4, 2009 AMENDED STATEMENT OF DEFENCE: DECEMBER 18, 2009 Departments of Justice and of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Trade Law Bureau Lester B. Pearson Building 125 Sussex Drive Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G2 CANADA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ..................................................................................... 1 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND........................................................................................... 2 A. Digby Neck, Nova Scotia and the Claimants’ Proposal for a 152 Hectare Quarry and Marine Terminal............................................................................................... 2 1. Digby Neck – Environment, Community and Economy............................ 2 2. The Claimants’ Proposal for a 152 Hectare Quarry and Marine Terminal. 4 B. Environmental Assessment in Canada.................................................................... 4 1. The Canadian Environmental Assessment Act........................................... 5 2. The Nova Scotia Environment Act............................................................. 8 3. The Joint Review Panel Process ............................................................... 10 C. The Environmental Assessment of the Proposed 152 Hectare Quarry and Marine Terminal................................................................................................................ 12 1. Overview of the Claimants’ Proposal....................................................... 12 a) Nova Stone’s Initial Application for a 3.9 Hectare Quarry on the 152 Hectare Quarry Site.......................................................................... 13 b) GQP’s Proposal to Construct the 152 Hectare Quarry and Marine Terminal........................................................................................... 14 2. Determinations by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.................... 15 3. Applicable Environmental Assessment Regime....................................... 15 4. Bilcon’s Request to Delay the Constitution of the Joint Review Panel.... 16 5. The Establishment of the Joint Review Panel........................................... 16 6. The Joint Review Panel Process ............................................................... 17 D. The Decisions of Nova Scotia and Canada Not to Approve the Quarry and Marine Terminal................................................................................................................ 19 III. THE TRIBUNAL HAS NO JURISDICTION TO HEAR CERTAIN ASPECTS OF THE CLAIM ................................................................................................................... 20 1. The Tribunal Does Not Have Jurisdiction over the Actions and Recommendations of the Joint Review Panel........................................... 21 2. The Claimants Do Not Have Standing to Bring a Claim with Respect to the 3.9 Hectare Quarry Permit Issued to Nova Stone ............................... 21 3. The Tribunal Does Not Have Jurisdiction to Consider Measures Prior to June 17, 2005 ............................................................................................ 22 ii a) Measures Alleged in Connection with 3.9 Hectare Quarry Permit . 22 b) Measures Alleged in Connection with Referral of Environmental Assessment to a Joint Review Panel................................................ 23 c) Measures Alleged in Connection with Department of Fisheries and Oceans.............................................................................................. 24 d) Measures Alleged in Connection with Offer to Purchase Public Road .......................................................................................................... 24 IV. CANADA HAS NOT BREACHED CHAPTER 11 OF NAFTA................................ 24 A. Canada has Not Breached NAFTA Article 1102.................................................. 25 B. Canada has Not Breached NAFTA Article 1105.................................................. 26 1. The Alleged Actions of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans did not Violate Article 1105.................................................................................. 26 2. The Refusal to Sell the Road Did Not Violate Article 1105..................... 27 3. The Environmental Assessment Process Did Not Violate Article 1105... 28 4. The Decision of the Joint Review Panel Did Not Violate Article 1105 ... 29 5. The Decisions of Nova Scotia and Canada to Not Approve the Quarry and Marine Terminal did not Violate Article 1105 ......................................... 30 C. Canada Has Not Breached Article 1103 ............................................................... 30 V. THE CLAIMANTS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO DAMAGES.................................... 31 VI. AWARD SOUGHT BY CANADA................................................................................ 31 APPENDICES I. Map of Nova Scotia and Map of Digby, Nova Scotia (Enlargement) II. Map of Whites Point Quarry and Marine Terminal Project, Digby County, Nova Scotia iii Pursuant to Article 19 of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, the Government of Canada (“Respondent” or “Canada”) respectfully submits this Statement of Defence in response to the Statement of Claim submitted by William Ralph Clayton, William Richard Clayton, Douglas Clayton, Daniel Clayton and Bilcon of Delaware, Inc. (“the Claimants”) on February 2, 2009. I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. Canada and Nova Scotia have rules and regulations for the environmental assessment of projects such as quarries and marine terminals: the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act at the federal level, and the Nova Scotia Environment Act at the provincial level. When an environmental assessment of such projects is required at both levels, the federal and provincial governments may enter into an agreement to conduct a single joint environmental assessment. 2. Environmental assessments in Canada are carried out without regard to the nationality of a project proponent. They provide for a fair and impartial process for assessing the environmental impact of proposed projects. 3. The Claimants in this case may be disappointed with the outcome of the environmental assessment of their proposed project. However, an investor is not entitled to bring a NAFTA claim simply because it disagrees with or is disappointed by the decisions of governmental authorities made in the course of such an assessment. The Claimants’ proposed project was subject to Canadian and Nova Scotia environmental assessment rules and regulations. They were entitled to be treated like other project proponents under NAFTA Articles 1102 and 1103 and to be subject to an environmental assessment process that did not fall below the minimum standard of treatment under NAFTA Article 1105. This treatment must be afforded to all project proponents subject to an environmental assessment in Canada, and was afforded to the Claimants. 4. In Part II of this Statement of Defence, Canada briefly outlines the facts relevant to the Claimants’ allegations. This part includes: (a) a description of the Claimants’ proposed quarry and marine terminal and of the region and community in which it was to operate—Digby Neck, Nova Scotia; (b) a summary of the rules and regulations governing the environmental assessment of projects in Canada; and, (c) an overview of the environmental assessment of the Claimants’ project. 5. In Part III, Canada identifies the Claimants’ allegations that are beyond the jurisdiction of this Tribunal. In particular, Canada identifies those allegations that: (a) do not relate to a measure of the Government of Canada; (b) the Claimants do not have standing to bring; and (c) are time- barred. 6. In Part IV, Canada demonstrates that there is no merit to the Claimants’ claims based on NAFTA Articles 1102, 1103 and 1105. The environmental assessment of the proposed quarry and marine terminal did not provide the Claimants with treatment less favourable than that accorded to Canadian investors, or investors of other nationalities, in like circumstances (NAFTA Articles 1102 and 1103). Nor have the Claimants identified treatment by Canada of the investment that falls below the minimum standard of treatment required by customary international law (NAFTA Article 1105). 7. In Part V, Canada outlines its position on the damages sought by the Claimants and puts the Claimants to the strict proof of their alleged losses. II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND A. Digby Neck, Nova Scotia and the Claimants’ Proposal for a 152 Hectare Quarry and Marine Terminal 1. Digby Neck – Environment, Community and Economy 8. Digby Neck is located on the southwest coast of the province of Nova Scotia. It is a narrow, 58 km-long peninsula extending between the Bay of Fundy and St. Mary’s Bay. Geologically, it is the spine of the North Mountain range. At the top end of the peninsula is the town of Digby. At the bottom are two small islands, Long Island and Brier Island. Maps of Nova Scotia and Digby Neck are attached at Appendix I. 9. The Bay of Fundy is a 270 km long bay that is 80 km wide at
Recommended publications
  • 2019 Bay of Fundy Guide
    VISITOR AND ACTIVITY GUIDE 2019–2020 BAYNova OF FUNDYScotia’s & ANNAPOLIS VALLEY TIDE TIMES pages 13–16 TWO STUNNING PROVINCES. ONE CONVENIENT CROSSING. Digby, NS – Saint John, NB Experience the phenomenal Bay of Fundy in comfort aboard mv Fundy Rose on a two-hour journey between Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. Ferries.ca Find Yourself on the Cliffs of Fundy TWO STUNNING PROVINCES. ONE CONVENIENT CROSSING. Digby, NS – Saint John, NB Isle Haute - Bay of Fundy Experience the phenomenal Bay of Fundy in comfort aboard mv Fundy Rose on a two-hour journey between Nova Scotia Take the scenic route and fi nd yourself surrounded by the and New Brunswick. natural beauty and rugged charm scattered along the Fundy Shore. Find yourself on the “Cliffs of Fundy” Cape D’or - Advocate Harbour Ferries.ca www.fundygeopark.ca www.facebook.com/fundygeopark Table of Contents Near Parrsboro General Information .................................. 7 Top 5 One-of-a-Kind Shopping ........... 33 Internet Access .................................... 7 Top 5 Heritage and Cultural Smoke-free Places ............................... 7 Attractions .................................34–35 Visitor Information Centres ................... 8 Tidally Awesome (Truro to Avondale) ....36–43 Important Numbers ............................. 8 Recommended Scenic Drive ............... 36 Map ............................................... 10–11 Top 5 Photo Opportunities ................. 37 Approximate Touring Distances Top Outdoor Activities ..................38–39 Along Scenic Route .........................10
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Map of the North Mountain Basalt from Cape Split to Brier Island, with Comments on Its Resource Potential
    Report of Activities 2005 39 Geological Map of the North Mountain Basalt from Cape Split to Brier Island, with Comments on its Resource Potential D. J. Kontak Introduction preparation and will be published elsewhere (Kontak, in prep.), where it is demonstrated that the sequence corresponds to other continental flood The Jurassic North Mountain Basalt (NMB) forms basalt provinces (e.g. 65 Ma Deccan Traps, 17- a prominent cuesta along the southern coastline of 15 Ma Columbia River Basalt Group) that have the Bay of Fundy, and is contiguous with outliers analogues in the active flows of Hawaii. This along the northern side of the bay (Fig. 1). This correspondence provides a basis for interpreting the prominent topographic feature, roughly 200 km in volcanological features of the NMB (see Kontak, length, is the focus of this paper and the topic of 2002, for discussion). field studies over the past few years (Kontak, 2000, 2002; Kontak et al., 2005). One result of this work is the first geological map of this unit over the Geological Setting length of the North Mountain (Kontak, 2005, 2006), which provides a basis for assessment of the Numerous, early Mesozoic continental tholeiitic area’s resources. Previous work indicated that the basalt flows, dykes and sills formed along the NMB contained three distinct flow units, referred eastern margin of North America, concurrent with to as the Lower, Middle and Upper flow units the infilling of basins with non-marine sedimentary (Kontak, 2002), and the results of this work have rocks during Pangean rupture, as a prelude to the shown that this subdivision can be extended over opening of the present-day Atlantic Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Stratigraphy of the Jurassic North Mountain Basalt, Southern Nova Scotia
    Report of Activities 2001 69 • Internal Stratigraphy of the Jurassic North Mountain Basalt, Southern Nova Scotia D. J. Kontak Introduction sediments are exposed, only 9 m of Scots Bay Formation remain as remnant inliers along the The Jurassic (201 Ma, Hodych and Dunning, 1992) Scots Bay coastline (De Wet and Hubert, 1989). North Mountain Basalt (NMB; also referred to as the North Mountain Fonnation) fonns a prominent The NMB outcrops along the Bay of Fundy in cuesta along the southern coastline of the Bay of southern mainland Nova Scotia and is Fundy. These continental, tholeiitic basalt flows exceptionally well exposed along the coastline and have played an important role in the geological inland along river valleys (Fig. 1). Topographic heritage of the province by: (l) hosting some ofthe relief of the area bounding the Bay of Fundy earliest mineral resources exploited (e.g. Cu, Fe), reflects the distribution of the underlying massive (2) contributing to the character of zeolite basalt flows. No more obvious is this than along mineralogy (e.g. type locality for mordenite; How, the Annapolis Valley area where the west side of 1864), (3) fonning part of the Fundy Rift Basin, an the valley is composed of massive, fresh basalt of important part of the Mesozoic evolution of eastern the lower flow unit of the NMB. The proximity of North America, and (4) filling an important niche the area on the north side of the Bay of Fundy to in the aggregate operations of the province. Despite the east-west Cobequid-Chedabucto Fault Zone has the importance of the NMB there has been resulted in structural modifications to the otherwise relatively little recent work devoted to defining and simple stratigraphy of the NMB.
    [Show full text]
  • Landform Generated: Nova Scotian Example
    Landform Generated: Drumlin (an oval or elongated hill) Nova Scotian Example: Halifax Military Heritage Preservation Society Kuowaqe’jk, Big Pine Hill (Citadel Hill, Halifax) MAIN CULPRIT: WATER & ICE Halifax is known for this large drumlin overlooking the city, dropped by this culprit. Made of unsorted sediment, the drumlin was soft enough to carve Citadel Hill into it. This culprit also left behind a partially submerged drumlin in the harbour. Mélanie Léger, Radio-Canada, 2019 Landform Generated: Erratic (a rock that does not match the rocks of the area) Nova Scotian Example: Kjipanu’pek, Great bay opening out to the sea (Areas along St. Margaret’s Bay) MAIN CULPRIT: WATER & ICE These large granite boulders likely came from the North Mountain batholith and were deposited and exposed by this culprit around 10,000 years ago. Striations scraped into the boulders tell us the direction of the culprit’s movement. Michael C. Rygel, Wikimedia Commons Landform Generated: Lake Basin (the indent where the water of a lake collects) Nova Scotian Example: Pitu’pok/Pitu’paq, Long dish of saltwater/To which all things flow (Bras d’Or Lakes, Cape Breton) MAIN CULPRIT: WATER & ICE This culprit carved the basins of the Bras d’Or lakes, leaving behind stratified sediment. As the lake basins formed, they filled with fresh water, but as the sea level rose, they filled with sea water and marine life. Joseph Apaloo, Research Gate, Jan 2010 Landform Generated: Roche Moutonée (a bare rock with a smooth gentle slope side and a steep, rough cliff side) Nova Scotian Example: Nukumkikewe’jk, At the soft place (Taylor Head Provincial Park) MAIN CULPRIT: WATER & ICE This culprit slowly travelled up the soft sandstone bedrock, making the gradual slope on one side.
    [Show full text]
  • Whale Tails & Other Stories.Pdf
    B Greg Trowse photo Thank you to the people and businesses who contributed to this guide: Photos: Brier Island Whale & Seabird Cruises Mariner Cruises June Farnsworth Robert J. Galbraith Todd Sollows Amanda Stark/Freeport Whale & Seabird Tours Amy Tudor Mi’kmaw Ecological Knowledge: Robert McEwan Sandy-Lynn Fisher Lenley Melvin Alanna Syliboy Fred Phillips Interviewees: Artwork: Frank Gillis June Farnsworth Penny Graham Gerald Gloade Shelley Lonergan Patricia Sollows Laurie and Tony Thurber cover image by June Farnsworth Amy Tudor C Greg Trowse photo Contents 1.Prologue 57. Orca 4. Mi'kmaw Ecological Knowledge 61. Sperm whale 7. Species Names in Mi'kmaw 64. Seals 10. General Species Locations 65. Harbour seal 12. Common Cetacean Behaviours 68. Grey seal 19. The Baleen Whales 71. Leatherback turtle 21. Minke whale 74. Sharks 25. Humpback whale 77. Porbeagle shark 30. Sei whale 80. Shortfin mako shark 33. North Atlantic right whale 83. Blue shark 37. Fin whale 86. Thresher shark 40. Blue whale 89. Great white shark 43. Toothed Whales & Dolphins 92. Basking shark 45. Harbour porpoise 95. Ocean sunfish 48. Atlantic white-sided dolphin 98. Other Fish of the Bay of Fundy 51. Beluga whale 102. Artist Profiles 54. Long-finned pilot whale 106. References 108. Reporting Sightings and Animals in Distress Greg Trowse photo E Prologue incredible Bay of Fundy and her thick they sounded like rainstorms creatures. Th is is meant to be a pounding the ocean and looked With this guide we are looking to living, growing document that will like a writhing silver mat moving bring together traditional knowl- evolve alongside our understand- atop the water as they attempted edge, scientifi c understanding, and ing and as contributions are made.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Brier Island
    PROCEEDINGS of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA Volume 46 2011 Part 1 SPECIAL ISSUE BIRDS OF BRIER ISLAND By Eric L. Mills and Lance Laviolette © Nova Scotian Institute of Science Affiliated with Access Copyright, The Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency http://www.accesscopyright.ca Date of Publication, September 2011 The Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science are supported in part by a grant from the Department of Tourism Culture and Heritage, Government of Nova Scotia, with the support of the Nova Scotia Museum. Publication of articles, principally but not exclusively in the area of natural and engineering science, will be considered as well as papers emanating from studies in the health professions. Both regular issues and special issues devoted to topics of current Nova Scotian or Maritime interest are published. EDITORIAL BOARD Peter G. Wells (Dalhousie University) ................................. Editor David H.S. Richardson (Saint Mary’s University) ............... Associate Editor Sarah Stevenson (Dalhousie University).............................. Production Editor Gail LeBlanc ........................................................................ Layout and Production Halcraft ................................................................................. Printing Roby Austin (Saint Mary’s University) ................................ Physics Nola Etkin (UPEI) ................................................................ Chemistry Mike Dadswell (Acadia University) ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bilcon of Delaware, Inc
    IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE UNCITRAL RULES OF 1976 (“UNCITRAL RULES”) - between - WILLIAM RALPH CLAYTON, WILLIAM RICHARD CLAYTON, DOUGLAS CLAYTON, DANIEL CLAYTON AND BILCON OF DELAWARE, INC. (the “Investors”) - and - GOVERNMENT OF CANADA (the “Respondent” and, together with the Investors, the “Parties”) AWARD ON JURISDICTION AND LIABILITY 17 MARCH 2015 ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL: Judge Bruno Simma (President) Professor Donald McRae Professor Bryan Schwartz SECRETARY: Dr. Dirk Pulkowski Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) Case No. 2009-04 PCA 122204 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................. I GLOSSARY OF DEFINED TERMS ......................................................................................................... VII I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 A. THE PARTIES...................................................................................................................... 1 B. THE ESSENCE OF THE INVESTORS’ CASE ........................................................................ 2 C. THE ESSENCE OF THE RESPONDENT’S CASE ................................................................... 8 II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY ..................................................................................................... 11 A. COMMENCEMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Demographics, Social Change and Outmigration on Digby Neck
    Learning to stay: Demographics, social change and outmigration on Digby Neck Submission to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Environmental Assessment Panel Whites Point Quarry and Marine Terminal Project June 27, 2007 Michael Corbett Acadia University Introduction In our last submission to the panel Tony Kelly and I critiqued the methodology of the socioeconomic analysis presented in the Bilcon Environmental Impact Study (EIS). We raised several concerns, none of which was addressed in any follow-up material from Bilcon that I have seen. It is my hope that the panel will take very seriously our critique of the social science methodology. I am resubmitting this document because it fits together with the analysis contained in this piece. I continue to believe that the social science components of the Bilson EIS are deeply flawed. Since this critique is already a matter of record, I would like in this presentation to present some data and analysis from my own surveys and from Census Canada microdata. Reference to the slides in this presentation should be cross-referenced with the Power Point document that I have included with this presentation. All references, tables and the framework of my analysis here come from my book Corbett (2007a). I submitted a copy of the book to the panel at the time of my presentation. I should also like to point out that this study has also been documented in a number of peer-reviewed education and social science journals which I can provide to the panel upon request (Corbett, 2001, 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007b, 2007c). 1 Demographic change on Digby Neck The general nature of the socioeconomic argument in the Bilcon EIS is fairly simple to summarize.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterisation of the Sublittoral Habitats of the Brier Island/Digby Neck Ecologically and Biologically Significant Area, Nova Scotia, Canada
    Characterisation of the sublittoral habitats of the Brier Island/Digby Neck Ecologically and Biologically Significant Area, Nova Scotia, Canada J. Andrew Cooper, Claire Goodwin, Peter Lawton, Torben Brydges, Crystal Hiltz, Shelley Armsworthy and Quinn McCurdy Coastal Ecosystem Science Division St. Andrews Biological Station 125 Marine Science Drive St. Andrews, New Brunswick Canada, E5B 0E4 2019 Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 3327 1 Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Technical reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge but which is not normally appropriate for primary literature. Technical reports are directed primarily toward a worldwide audience and have an international distribution. No restriction is placed on subject matter and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, namely, fisheries and aquatic sciences. Technical reports may be cited as full publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report is abstracted in the data base Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts. Technical reports are produced regionally but are numbered nationally. Requests for individual reports will be filled by the issuing establishment listed on the front cover and title page. Numbers 1-456 in this series were issued as Technical Reports of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 457-714 were issued as Department of the Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service, Research
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G.PDF
    Expert Report of David Estrin APPENDIxG CEAA CASE STUDY COMPARISON: TIVERTON HARBOUR PROPOSAL IN TIVERTON, NOVA SCOTIA (CEAA SCREENING, 2003/04) WITH THE WPQ Appendix G Comparison ofthe CEAA Processing of Two Proposed Projects in Digby Neck and Islands, Nova Scotia: Tiverton Harbour Proposal (Tiverton, Nova Scotia) (CEAA Screening, 2003/04) White Point Quarry and Marine Terminal (Review Panel Report, October 2007) Summary The Tiverton Harbour project provides an important contrast to the WPQ project. The marine environment (including the species of fish and whales in the vicinity) were similar in both locations. But the potential for disruption and destruction of fish habitat was greater at Tiverton because of underwater blasting and the deposit of a large volume of rock on the harbour floor. At WPQ no underwater blasting would take place. The proponent was the Government of Canada. The Tiverton project was approved in a timely fashion after going through only a screening level environmental assessment under CEAA. Analysis This was a proposal of the Government of Canada (the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans) to develop a new harbour facility at Tiverton, Nova Scotia, approximately 10 km from the proposed location of the Whites Point Quarry. (Tiverton can be seen on the map on p. 2 of the WPQ Panel Report, just down the road to the south of the WPQ location.) In fact, Tiverton is directly opposite East Ferry, which is on the western tip of Digby Neck. The Tiverton Harbour project required blasting of rock at the bottom of the harbour depositing approximately 65,000 tonnes of rock and stone to create a new breakwater.
    [Show full text]
  • Brier Island Whale and Seabird Cruises Ltd. P.O
    Brier Island Whale and Seabird Cruises Ltd. P.O. Box 1199 Westport, Nova Scotia, B0V 1H0 Phone (902) 839-2995 Fax (902) 839-2075 [email protected] January 18, 2005 Dear Panel, We are seriously concerned and strongly opposed to the establishment of a Quarry at White’s Cove, Digby County, Nova Scotia. Our concerns are not only from a Tourism perspective, but also environmental issues as well as the commercial fishing point of view. It is our understanding that this Quarry will be in operation up to 50 years. If this were so, I can guarantee that the Bay of Fundy a once, flourishing feeding area for all marine life, will be nothing but a water wasteland, used for nothing more than the transport of goods, given the disruption to its marine life. Many species of whales inhabit the Bay. Resident species include the rarest of all whales in the world, the North Atlantic Right Whales, Humpback Whales, Fin Whales, Minke whales, Atlantic White Sided Dolphins, Atlantic White Beaked Dolphins and Harbor porpoise. The Bay of Fundy is so rich in nutrients that other species have visited the Bay following their prey such as Orcas, Pilot whales, Sperm Whales, Blue Whales, Beluga Whales and Common Dolphins. ( Our research division has collected data on these whales since 1984 and have these species documented by location, date, time, photographs etc. and it is available should you wish more information about the cetaceans that occupy the Bay of Fundy. Our data is also submitted to other research organizations who conduct studies in the Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Geology Map of Basaltic Rocks of the North Mountain Formation from Brier Island to Sandy Cove
    Part of NTS Sheets 21A/05, 21B/01, 21B/08 and 21B/09 Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources - Mineral Resources Branch OFM ME 2010-8 66°30'W 66°20'W 44°30'N 66°10'W 220000mE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 230 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 240 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 250 51 52 53 54 255000mE N N 000m 000m 19 49 36 Legend 49 MESOZOIC 18 Long 35 Poi nt TRIASSIC FUNDY GROUP NORTH MOUNTAIN FORMATION 17 Burns 34 > Second Point BRIER ISLAND MEMBER (Upper Flow Unit) (^Fnmb) : this unit ( À 150 m) occurs at the ^Fnmb ^Fnmb Point Cu > top of the basalt sequence, conformable on unit ^Fnmm and outcrops extensively on the > northern shorelines except in the central part of the mapped area where it is notably Mount absent. The basalt is massive, dark grey to grey-green with microcrysts (À 5%) of Fe plagioclase and pyroxene with variable (À 30-40%) amounts of mesostasis in a medium- Shubley 16 ^Fnmm grained, ophitic-textured host. This unit consists of 1 or 2 flow sheets, has colonnade- > 33 style polygonal jointing (À 1 m) and, at the base, inclined pipe vesicles occur. The lower Sandy Cove 10-20 m locally (e.g., Morden, Margaretsville) contains felsic material (ca. 65-74 wt. % 66°30'W SiO2 ) in the form of dykes, amoeboid masses and spectacular segregation pipes (3-60 ^Fnme 2 cm; 10-15/m ) that are sometimes cored by agate and crystalline silica.
    [Show full text]