Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review Volume 10 Number 2 Article 11 3-1-1990 A Famous Title is Worth 1,000 Publicity Stunts: Does the Owner of the Motion Picture Copyright to the Amityville Horror Own the Title Vincent Yanniello Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Vincent Yanniello, A Famous Title is Worth 1,000 Publicity Stunts: Does the Owner of the Motion Picture Copyright to the Amityville Horror Own the Title, 10 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 715 (1989). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr/vol10/iss2/11 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. A FAMOUS TITLE IS WORTH 1,000 PUBLICITY STUNTS: DOES THE OWNER OF THE MOTION PICTURE COPYRIGHT TO THE AMITYVILLE HORROR OWN THE TITLE? The general rule of law is that the noblest of human produc- tions-knowledge, truths ascertained, conceptions, and ideas- become, after voluntary communication to others, free as the air to common use. -Justice Brandeis I. INTRODUCTION A. Warning: Some Rights in Titles Are Not Assignable Rules protecting titles in the entertainment industry may confuse, agitate and even exasperate the experienced lawyer who would like to answer the simple question: Does the owner of a copyrighted work own its title? Somewhere between the fringe areas of trademark law and the shadow of copyright, courts give effect to contract clauses that transfer titles in agreements between sellers and buyers of literary works.