DOCSLIB.ORG

Sioux Travel Management FEIS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sioux Travel Management FEIS Final Environmental Impact United States Forest Department of Statement Service Agriculture Sioux Travel Management Sioux Ranger District Custer National Forest Carter County of Montana and Harding County of South Dakota June 2009 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. SIOUX RANGER DISTRICT TRAVEL MANAGEMENT Final Environmental Impact Statement Custer National Forest - Sioux Ranger District Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible Official: Mary C. Erickson, Acting Forest Supervisor Custer NF, 1310 Main St. Billings, MT 59105 For Information Contact: Doug Epperly, Project Coordinator Custer NF, 1310 Main Street Billings, MT 59105 (406) 657-6205 ext. 225 Abstract: The Forest Service is proposing to designate routes for public motorized use within the Sioux Ranger District of the Custer National Forest. The new travel management decision would designate system roads and trails for public motorized uses and specify the type of vehicle and season of use for each route. Motorized off-route travel would be prohibited, except where designated for access to dispersed vehicle camping. Over-snow vehicle use is not part of the decision to be made in this analysis. The two action alternatives considered in this EIS represent a broad range of public sentiment regarding road and motorized trail management, and frame the significant issues related to the decision to be made. The alternative of taking no action is also considered in this EIS. The preferred alternative is Alternative B. Comments on this FEIS. Public review and comment was solicited on the “draft” environmental impact statement (DEIS), and utilized in the preparation of this final environmental impact statement (FEIS). No further public review nor public comment is being sought on this “final” EIS. Appeal of Decisions. Reviewers whom disagree with information presented in this FEIS may appeal any decision based upon it. Decisions based upon this FEIS are described in separate documents. It is the reviewer’s responsibility to obtain those decision documents and follow procedures described in them to appeal the decision(s). TABLE OF CONTENT Chapter 1: Purpose and Need, and Proposed Action 1.1 OVERVIEW OF CHANGES FROM THE DRAFT TO THE FINAL EIS ..........................................................1-1 1.2 BACKGROUND.........................................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2.1 AGENCY TRAVEL MANAGEMENT PLANNING..........................................................................................1-1 1.2.2 DISTRICT TRAVEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND PLANNING................................................................1-2 1.2.3 FOUR THREATS TO FOREST AND GRASSLAND HEALTH.......................................................................1-2 1.2.4 ROADS ANALYSIS .........................................................................................................................................1-2 1.2.5 GENERAL LOCATION AND GEOGRAPHIC SETTING...............................................................................1-3 1.2.6 DOCUMENT STRUCTURE ...........................................................................................................................1-4 1.3 PURPOSE AND NEED..............................................................................................................................................1-4 1.4 PROPOSED ACTION ...............................................................................................................................................1-5 1.5 SCOPE OF DECISION TO BE MADE ...................................................................................................................1-5 1.5.1 DECISIONS TO BE MADE............................................................................................................................1-5 1.5.2 DECISIONS THAT WILL NOT BE MADE.....................................................................................................1-5 1.6 LEGAL FRAMEWORK ...........................................................................................................................................1-5 1.6.1 AUTHORITY FOR TRAVEL MANAGEMENT PLANNING...........................................................................1-6 1.6.2 EXECUTIVE ORDER 11644 AS AMENDED BY EXECUTIVE ORDER 11989............................................1-6 1.6.3 EXECUTIVE ORDER 13443..........................................................................................................................1-6 1.6.4 2005 MOTORIZED TRAVEL RULE ..............................................................................................................1-6 1.6.4.1 Designation Criteria.................................................................................................................................1-6 Access Needs ...........................................................................................................................................1-8 Accessibility.............................................................................................................................................1-8 Conflicts Among Uses of National Forest System Lands.........................................................................1-8 Safety .......................................................................................................................................................1-9 Montana State Law ...................................................................................................................................1-9 South Dakota State Law..........................................................................................................................1-10 Operator Responsibilities........................................................................................................................1-10 1.6.4.2 Administrative Use................................................................................................................................1-11 1.6.4.3 Public Rights-Of-Way Access...............................................................................................................1-12 1.6.4.4 Revised Statute (R.S.) 2477 Rights-Of-Way.........................................................................................1-12 1.6.5 MINIMUM ROAD SYSTEM (36 CFR 212.5(B)(1)) .....................................................................................1-12 1.6.6 REGIONAL TRAVEL MANAGEMENT PLANNING GUIDANCE...............................................................1-13 1.6.6.1 Motorized Game Retrieval....................................................................................................................1-13 1.6.6.2 Motorized Cross-Country Areas............................................................................................................1-13 1.6.7 1986 CUSTER NATIONAL FOREST LAND AND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN..........................1-14 Chapter 2: Public Participation, Issues and Alternatives 2.1 OVERVIEW OF CHANGES FROM DRAFT TO FINAL EIS.............................................................................2-1 2.2 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................................2-1 2.3 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................2-1 2.3.1 PUBLIC SCOPING ........................................................................................................................................2-1 2.3.2 NOTICE OF INTENT .....................................................................................................................................2-2 2.3.3 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT FOR THE DEIS ...................................................................................................2-2 Table of Content TOC-i TABLE OF CONTENT 2.4 SIGNIFICANT ISSUES.............................................................................................................................................2-3 2.4.1 RECREATION ................................................................................................................................................2-3 2.4.2 CULTURAL RESOURCES .............................................................................................................................2-4 2.4.3 WILDLIFE......................................................................................................................................................2-4 2.5 OTHER ISSUES.........................................................................................................................................................2-4
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Six Adventure Road Trips
    Easy Drives, Big Fun, and Planning Tips Six Adventure Road Trips DAY HIKES, FLY-FISHING, SKIING, HISTORIC SITES, AND MUCH MORE A custom guidebook in partnership with Montana Offi ce of Tourism and Business Development and Outside Magazine Montana Contents is the perfect place for road tripping. There are 3 Glacier Country miles and miles of open roads. The landscape is stunning and varied. And its towns are welcoming 6 Roaming the National Forests and alluring, with imaginative hotels, restaurants, and breweries operated by friendly locals. 8 Montana’s Mountain Yellowstone and Glacier National Parks are Biking Paradise the crown jewels, but the Big Sky state is filled with hundreds of equally awesome playgrounds 10 in which to mountain bike, trail run, hike, raft, Gateways to Yellowstone fish, horseback ride, and learn about the region’s rich history, dating back to the days of the 14 The Beauty of Little dinosaurs. And that’s just in summer. Come Bighorn Country winter, the state turns into a wonderland. The skiing and snowboarding are world-class, and the 16 Exploring Missouri state offers up everything from snowshoeing River Country and cross-country skiing to snowmobiling and hot springs. Among Montana’s star attractions 18 Montana on Tap are ten national forests, hundreds of streams, tons of state parks, and historic monuments like 20 Adventure Base Camps Little Bighorn Battlefield and the Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail. Whether it’s a family- 22 friendly hike or a peaceful river trip, there’s an Montana in Winter experience that will recharge your spirit around every corner in Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidate Campaign Finance Report (C-5)
    Campaign Electronic Reporting System (viewFinanceReport) Page 1 of 92 Candidate Campaign Finance Report (C-5) Candidate Information Date Filed: 10/03/2019 Original Filing for: 10/01/2019 - 12/31/2019 D1 Received Date: Report Type: Initial C118 Received Date: Receive and File Date: 01/06/2020 Report Status: Filed Williams, Whitney PO Box 7013, Missoula, MT 59807 Election Year: 2020 Resident County: Missoula Office Sought: Governor Political Party: Democrat [email protected] Candidate Type: Statewide Candidate Status: Active Treasurer: Bank Information: Giarraputo, Holly First Interstate Bank 3242 Cummins Way Missoula, MT 59802 PO Box 4667 Missoula, MT 59806 Summary Report Cash Summary: Money Received and Spent Primary General 1. Cash in Bank - Balance from previous report $0.00 $0.00 2. Receipts - Total Received and deposited this period + $310,657.90 $128,550.20 Subtotal $310,657.90 $128,550.20 3. Expenditures - Total paid out this period - $186,115.98 $0.00 4. Cash in Bank - Ending Balance this report $124,541.92 $128,550.20 Candidate Contributions In-Kind Cash/Check Election Description Value Amount Total to Date Loans Occupation/ In-Kind Cash/Check Descriptio Entity Employer Election Date Value Amount Total to Date n Fundraisers In-Kind Cash/Check Descriptio Entity Election Purpose Date Value Amount Total to Date n Delta Airlines 11/27/201 $88.30(P) PO Box 20980, Atlanta, GA Primary Vendor Refund $0.00 $88.30 9 30320 $0.00(G) Committee Contributions In-Kind Cash/Check Descriptio Entity Committee Type Election Date Value Amount
    [Show full text]
  • References for Montana Plant Community Field Guide
    References For Montana Plant Community Field Guide Achuff, P. L. 1989. Old-growth forests of the Canadian Rocky Mountain National Parks. Natural Areas Journal 9:12-26. Agee, J. K., and J. Kertis. 1987. Forest types of the north Cascades National Park Service complex. Canadian Journal of Botany 65:1520-1530. Aiken, S. G., M. J. Dallwitz, C. L. McJannet, and L. L. Consaul. 1996 onwards. Festuca of North America: Descriptions, Illustrations, Identification, and Information Retrieval, 2nd Version: URL, April 1998. http://biodiversity.uno.edu/delta/. Aiken, S.G. and S. J. Darbyshire. 1990. Fescue Grasses of Canada. Agriculture Canada Publication 1844/E. Aldous, A. E., and H. L. Shantz. 1924. Types of vegetation in the semiarid portion of the United States and their economic significance. Journal of Agricultural Research. 28(2):99-125. Alexander, R. R. 1985. Major habitat types, community types, and plant communities in the Rocky Mountains. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-123, Fort Collins, CO. 105 pp. Alexander, R. R. 1985. Major habitat types, community types, and plant communities in the Rocky Mountains. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-123. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 105 pp. Alexander, R. R., G. R. Hoffman, and J. M. Wirsing. 1986. Forest vegetation of the Medicine Bow National Forest in southeastern Wyoming: A habitat type classification. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-271. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 39 pp. Antos, J. A. 1977. Grand fir (Abies grandis (Douglas) Forbes) forests of the Swan Valley, Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Knife River Flint Distribution and Identification in Montana
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2016 Knife River Flint Distribution and Identification in Montana Laura Evilsizer University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Indigenous Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Evilsizer, Laura, "Knife River Flint Distribution and Identification in Montana" (2016). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 10670. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/10670 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. KNIFE RIVER FLINT DISTRIBUTION AND IDENTIFICATION IN MONTANA By Laura Jean Evilsizer B.A. Anthropology, Whitman College, Walla Walla, WA, 2011 Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology, Cultural Heritage University of Montana Missoula, MT May, 2016 Approved By: Scott Wittenburg, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Dr. Douglas H. MacDonald, Chair Department of Anthropology Dr. John Douglas Department of Anthropology Dr. Julie A.
    [Show full text]
  • MNPS Annual Meeting: Needmore Prairie
    elseyaNewsletter of the Montana Native Plant Society Kelseya uniflora K ill. by Bonnie Heidel MNPS Annual Meeting:Needmore Prairie By Beth Madden, Maka Flora Chapter Join us June 17-19 at Camp Needmore in Ekalaka for the MNPS Annual Meeting. We will explore the rolling plains, buttes and table lands of southeast Montana, Narrowleaf penstemon some e of the most extensive, unbroken area of prairie (Penstemon angustifolius) in the state. A slate of field trips will take us to diverse stars as our emblematic prairie and ponderosa pine habitats. We’ll visit Forest plant for the Needmore Service and private lands around Capitol Rock, Bell Tower Prairie meeting. Carter Rock and Chalk Buttes, as well as nearby Medicine Rocks County is the only place State Park and area BLM lands. In the evening, we will in Montana where you return to Camp Needmore, a rustic camp built by the can see this lovely purple, Civilian Conservation Corps in the Custer National Forest. sand-loving wildflower. The main hall provides ample space to gather and share Artist Claire Emery meals. You can stay in dormitory-style cabins, pitch has created a stunning your tent or hook up an RV. We have invited both the woodcut of Penstemon Wyoming and Great Plains Native Plant Societies to join angustifolius for our logo. us here. Two original prints will be Friday night’s campfire will feature poetry and songs; available to lucky bidders please bring your contribution and/or instrument. On at the meeting. The Saturday night, rancher and conservation writer Linda Penstemon Angustifolius.
    [Show full text]
  • A 2009 Supplement to Birds of the Rocky Mountains
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Birds of the Rocky Mountains -- Paul A. Johnsgard Papers in the Biological Sciences 11-2009 A 2009 Supplement to Birds of the Rocky Mountains Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscibirdsrockymtns Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "A 2009 Supplement to Birds of the Rocky Mountains" (2009). Birds of the Rocky Mountains -- Paul A. Johnsgard. 3. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscibirdsrockymtns/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Birds of the Rocky Mountains -- Paul A. Johnsgard by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. A 2009 Supplement to Birds of the Rocky Mountains Paul A. Johnsgard More than 20 years have elapsed since the publication of Birds of the Rocky Mountains, and many changes have occurred in that region’s ecology and bird life. There has also been a marked increase in recreational bird-watching, and an associated need for informative regional references on where and when to look for rare or especially appealing birds. As a result, an updating of the text seemed appropriate, especially as to the species accounts and the technical lit- erature. The following update includes all those species that have undergone changes in their vernacular or Latin names, have had important changes in ranges, or have shown statistically significant population trends or conserva- tion status warranting mention.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Montana Fire Zone Fire Danger Analysis
    Eastern Montana Fire Zone Fire Danger Analysis This Page Intentionally Left Blank Reviewed By: Craig Howels - Fire Management Officer Date Eastern Montana/Dakotas BLM District Prepared By: David Lee – Assistant Center Manager Date Miles City Interagency Dispatch Center Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 II. Fire Danger Planning Area Inventory and Analysis ....................................................................... 1 A. Fire Danger Rating Areas (FDRAs) ............................................................................................................ 1 B. Selected Weather Stations ....................................................................................................................... 2 III. Fire Danger Analysis .................................................................................................................... 3 A. Fire Business Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 3 IV. Fire Danger Operating Procedures .............................................................................................. 4 A. Roles and Responsibilities ........................................................................................................................ 4 1. Compliance with Weather Station Standards (NWCG PMS 426-3) ................................................ 4
    [Show full text]
  • Custer Gallatin
    CUSTER GALLATIN United States Department of Agriculture R1-97-104 Revised 2019 WEST SIDE OF FOREST EAST SIDE OF FOREST Welcome to the Custer Gallatin National Forest To ensure that everyone has a safe and enjoyable visit, please remember: Dispose of garbage appropriately. Camping is limited to 16 days Keep our waters clean by disposing in any one campground or location of dishwater far away from any 14 day limit in the South Dakota units of ( water source. the Sioux District) Recycle your recyclables. Keep a clean camp. Store all food and wildlife attractants properly. CAR CAMPING OUTSIDE OF DEVELOPED Food Storage Order requirements CAMPGROUNDS -“dispersed” car camping in locations with no facilities is allowed ONLY are in effect Forest-wide March 1- as specified in the Custer Gallatin National Dec 1 (except in the Ashland and Sioux Forest Motor Vehicle Use Maps. Where car Ranger Districts). The safety of others camping is limited to designated campsites depends upon you!! only, all legal car campsites are marked. Camping with stock is not allowed in most developed campgrounds. Call the local ranger districts for more information, or check our web site for stock facilities. Be aware that natural hazards exist, even in developed campgrounds and recreation sites. Federal Recreation Passes are accepted at all fee campgrounds and apply only to the basic campsite fee. For more information, visit our website http://www.fs.usda.gov/main/custergallatin ASHLAND RANGER DISTRICT, PO Box 168, 2378 US HWY 212, Ashland, Montana 59003, (406) 784-2344 Along with multi-colored buttes and wildlife galore, Ashland District’s topography contrasts from rolling grasslands to steep rock outcroppings.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary and Late Tertiary of Montana: Climate, Glaciation, Stratigraphy, and Vertebrate Fossils
    QUATERNARY AND LATE TERTIARY OF MONTANA: CLIMATE, GLACIATION, STRATIGRAPHY, AND VERTEBRATE FOSSILS Larry N. Smith,1 Christopher L. Hill,2 and Jon Reiten3 1Department of Geological Engineering, Montana Tech, Butte, Montana 2Department of Geosciences and Department of Anthropology, Boise State University, Idaho 3Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, Billings, Montana 1. INTRODUCTION by incision on timescales of <10 ka to ~2 Ma. Much of the response can be associated with Quaternary cli- The landscape of Montana displays the Quaternary mate changes, whereas tectonic tilting and uplift may record of multiple glaciations in the mountainous areas, be locally signifi cant. incursion of two continental ice sheets from the north and northeast, and stream incision in both the glaciated The landscape of Montana is a result of mountain and unglaciated terrain. Both mountain and continental and continental glaciation, fl uvial incision and sta- glaciers covered about one-third of the State during the bility, and hillslope retreat. The Quaternary geologic last glaciation, between about 21 ka* and 14 ka. Ages of history, deposits, and landforms of Montana were glacial advances into the State during the last glaciation dominated by glaciation in the mountains of western are sparse, but suggest that the continental glacier in and central Montana and across the northern part of the eastern part of the State may have advanced earlier the central and eastern Plains (fi gs. 1, 2). Fundamental and retreated later than in western Montana.* The pre- to the landscape were the valley glaciers and ice caps last glacial Quaternary stratigraphy of the intermontane in the western mountains and Yellowstone, and the valleys is less well known.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Insect and Disease Conditions and Program Highlights – 2008
    Montana United States Forest Insect and Disease Conditions Department of Agriculture and Program Forest Service Northern Region Highlights Forest Health Protection 2008 Report 09-1 Montana Department of Bio Control: Mecinus janthinus Natural Resources and Conservation on Dalmatian Toadflax. Forestry Division Special Survey: One of many Aspen stands surveyed for insect and disease activity “The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all of part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large prints, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.” MMOONNTTAANNAA Forest Insect and Disease Conditions and Program Highlights – 2008 Report 09-01 2009 Compiled By: Amy Gannon, Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, Forestry Division Scott Sontag, USDA Forest Service, Northern Region, State and Private Forestry, Forest Health Protection Contributors: Gregg DeNitto, Ken Gibson, Marcus Jackson, Blakey Lockman, Scott Sontag, Brytten Steed, and Nancy Sturdevant, of the USDA Forest Service, Northern Region, State and Private Forestry, Forest Health Protection; Amy Gannon of the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, Forestry Division; Brennan Ferguson of Ferguson Forest Pathology Consulting Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Mountain Lion Monitoring & Management Strategy
    MONTANA MOUNTAIN LION MONITORING & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY — DRAFT, OCT. 2018 — Cover photo: R. Wiesner 2 — DRAFT, OCT. 2018 — TABLE OF CONTENTS MOUNTAIN LION CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES ............................................................................4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................6 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................8 CHAPTER 1 MOUNTAIN LIONS IN MONTANA ........................................... 10 CHAPTER 2 MOUNTAIN LION-HUMAN CONFLICT ...................................19 CHAPTER 3 2016 MONTANA MOUNTAIN LION .......................................26 RESOURCE SELECTION FUNCTION ..............................................................26 CHAPTER 4 MONTANA MOUNTAIN LION ECOREGIONS ........................31 CHAPTER 5 MONITORING MOUNTAIN LION ABUNDANCE ...................43 CHAPTER 6 THE MONTANA MOUNTAIN LION INTEGRATED POPULATION MODEL ............................................................ 50 CHAPTER 7 MOUNTAIN LION HARVEST REGULATION ..........................56 CHAPTER 8 ADAPTIVE HARVEST MANAGEMENT ...................................61 CHAPTER 9 REGIONAL MANAGEMENT .....................................................67 CONSIDERATIONS AND OBJECTIVES APPENDIX 1 POPULATION MONITORING, FIELD PROTOCOL ............. 94 AND DATA ANALYSIS APPENDIX 2 MOUNTAIN LION INTEGRATED POPULATION MODEL DEFINITION AND USER INPUTS ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Serviceberry: Ecology Distribution and Relationships to Big Game
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1975 Serviceberry: Ecology distribution and relationships to big game D. Dennis Hemmer The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Hemmer, D. Dennis, "Serviceberry: Ecology distribution and relationships to big game" (1975). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 6809. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/6809 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SERV/ICEBERRY; ECOLOGY, DISTRIBUTION, AND RELATIONSHIPS TO BIG GAME By Dennis M. Hemmer B .S., University of Montana, 1971 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1975 Approved by Chairman, Board of Examiners UMl Number: EP37610 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT OMMTtation Publithing UMl EP37610 Published by ProQuest LLC (2013). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]