DOCSLIB.ORG

The Relation Between the Evaluation of Primary and Secondary School

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Relation Between the Evaluation of Primary and Secondary School The Relation between the Evaluation of primary and secondary school students in mathematics with the student’s Choice of type of school (day school or evening school) and the Role of students’ Gender KAPELOU EKATERINI, KOKKALIDIS STAVROS Omirou 34, Irakleio Attikis, Greece [[email protected], [email protected]] 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 19K Abstract In previous years more often the students dropped out the compulsory educa- tion because of social factors. Researches have supported this case. In our country, researches (Drettaki 1993) [1] have shown that factors as the record of students in the various stages of education influence the abandonment of compulsory school. It also has shown that the student’s abilities in mathematics influence them in order to continue their studies. 1 Introduction The European frame has sustained significant cultural, social, political, techno- logical and economic changes. Societies lose their cohesion. These facts influenced every individual’s right to education, training and employment to the extent that more and more individuals, social teams - even entire regions - are excluded from the practices of social integration. Research of the international organism Eurostat (1996) reports that an impor- tant percentage (15%) of Europe’ population has been marginalized economically and socially because of unemployment. That enough times results from this popu- lation’s insufficient qualifications. In the countries of the European Union the du- ration of compulsory education oscillates from 8 - 10 years. After the establishment of compulsory education in all countries of EU, the rates of attendance in the edu- cation were increased considerably. In 1995 researches (Baltas G), declared that 20 millions young Europeans (on school age) did not acquire the minimal educational qualifications. According to the relative research (Drettaki 1993,Stathopoulou & Chaviaris 2006) an important factor - that also connected with the premature inter- ruption of study and the abandonment of school - is the difficulty that the children faced with Mathematics. In an OVE research (1996), an important number of stu- dents that interrupted the school, declared weakness in the course of mathematics. Others researches have shown (Raty & Snellman, 1995) that the teachers’ opinions about the students’ knowledge in mathematics, influence them about their abilities (Leder, Pearn, Brew & Bishop, 1997) for farther education. When the students decide to continue their compulsory studies there are significant reasons that seems to influences their decisions about the type of school (day or evening school).More specifically their teachers’ as their own opinions about their knowledges in mathe- matics during the primary school, seem to influence the children about the choice 1 of the type of high school. In our country (Greece) the experience and the research have sown that the ”weak” and ”middle” students prefer an evening than a day school to keep on their studies. This conclusion arises from the students’ decla- ration that an evening school is more easily for their learning abilities. We also would underlined that the same research (OECD 1996) seemed that the students were not interrupting so often their education in the regions where functioned an evening high school or an evening Lyceum. This presentation is part of a wider study which aimed to investigate social and educational factors that influenced students dropping out of school in the Dodecanese islands of Greece. 2 Argument In our research project in order to study the interaction between mathemat- ics education and school failure in Dodecanese Islands we followed four phases performance (Kalavassis et al., 2005; Kafoussi Chaviaris, 2006; Stathopoulou & Chaviaris, 2006): 1. registration and elaboration of educational data and conditions in the Do- decanese islands and the performance of the population in school mathematics 2. criteria of choice and selection of the student’s population from evening high schools (gymnasium and lyceum) for more deep research with structured questioner, 3. criteria of choice and selection of students as case-study according to their personal school-routes with semi-structured interviews, 4. comparison of the results of the data elaboration, of the questioners and of the semi-structured interviews, to investigate the students’ development in math- ematics education and the relation with school failure in each case. For the purpose of this conference we focus on a part of second phase of this research which was carried out in 344 evening school students - 204 from gymna- sium (high school) and 140 from lyceum (senior high school). More specifically six factors are interrelated: a. The students’choice about the school type (day or evening high school) b. Students’Evaluation from ”others” in mathematics during the primary school. c. The students’ choice about the school type (day or evening Lyceum) d. Students’ self-evaluation in mathematics during the primary school e. The role of students’ gender for the choice of type of high school f. The role of students’gender for the choice of type of Lyceum The interrelations that will be discussed are axb (table 1), axd (table 2), cxb (table 3), cxd (table 4), exa (table 5), fxa (table 6). evaluation from ”others” choice about the school type in mathematics during the primary school Day high school Evening high school W eak 23(24%) 24(21%) Middle 24(26%) 58(50%) Good 47(50%) 34(29%) total 94(100%) 116(100%) Table 1: Distribution of the relation between the students’ choice about the 2 school type (day or evening high school) and the students’ evaluation in mathemat- ics from ”others” during the primary school. In table 1 we can see that: a) From the 94 students who decided to continue their compulsory education to a day high school, the 47 (50%) declared that they had evaluated - by ”others” - in primary school mathematics as ”good”. From the remaining students the 24 (26%) had evaluated as ”weak” and the 23(24%) as ”middle”. We underline that the big majority 47(50%) of the students who decided to continue their compulsory education to a day high school declared that they had evaluated (in primary school mathematics) as ”good” students. b) From the 116 students who decided to continue their compulsory education to an evening high school, the 58 (50%) declared that they had evaluated - by ”oth- ers” - in primary school mathematics as ”middle”. From the remaining students the 24 (21%) had evaluated as ”weak” and the 34(29%) as ”good”. We underline that the big majority 58(50%) of the students who decided to continue their com- pulsory education to an evening high school declared that they had evaluated (in primary school mathematics) as ”good” students. self-evaluation from ”others” choice about the school type in mathematics during the primary school Day high school Evening high school W eak 20(11%) 16(14%) Middle 91(53%) 72(63%) Good 62(36%) 27(23%) total 173(100%) 115(100%) Table 2: Distribution of the relation between the students’ choice about the school type (day or evening high school) and the self-evaluation in mathematics during the primary school In table 2 we can see that: a) From the 173 students who decided to con- tinue their compulsory education to a day high school, the 91(53%) declared that they had self-evaluated in primary school mathematics as ”middle”. From the re- maining students the 20 (11%) had self-evaluated as ”weak” and the 62 (36%) as ”good”. We underline that the big majority 91(53%) of the students who decided to continue their compulsory education to a day high school declared that they had self-evaluated (in primary school mathematics) as ”middle” students. b) From the 115 students who decided to continue their compulsory education to an evening high school, the 72 (63%) declared that they had self-evaluated in primary school mathematics as ”middle”. From the remaining students the 16 (14%) had self-evaluated as ”weak” and the 27(23%) as ”good”. We underline that the big majority 72(63%) of the students who decided to continue their com- pulsory education to an evening high school declared that they had self-evaluated (in primary school mathematics) as ”middle” students. 3 evaluation from ”others” choice about the school type in mathematics during the primary school Day Lyceum Evening Lyceum W eak 4(16%) 12(15%) Middle 13(52%) 30(36%) Good 8(32%) 40(49%) total 25(100%) 82(100%) Table 3: Distribution of the relation the relation between the students’ choice about the school type (day or evening Lyceum) and the students’ evaluation in mathematics from ”others” during the primary school. In table 3 we can see that: a) From the 25 students who decided to continue their compulsory education to a day Lyceum, the 13 (52%) declared that they had evaluated - by ”others” - in primary school mathematics as ”middle”. From the remaining students the 4 (16%) had evaluated as ”weak” and the 8 (32%) as ”good”. We underline that the big majority 13(52%) of the students who decided to continue their education to a day Lyceum declared that they had evaluated (in primary school mathematics) as ”middle” students. b) From the 82 students who decided to continue their compulsory education to an evening Lyceum, the 40 (49%) declared that they had self-evaluated in primary school mathematics as ”good”. From the remaining students the 12 (15%) had self-evaluated as ”weak” and the 30(36%) as ”middle”. We underline that the big majority 40(49%) of the students who decided to continue their education to an evening Lyceum declared that they had self-evaluated (in primary school mathematics) as ”good” students. evaluation from ”others” choice about the school type in mathematics during the primary school Day Lyceum Evening Lyceum W eak 1(4%) 9(11%) Middle 11(45%) 43(52%) Good 12(50%) 30(37%) total 24(100%) 82(100%) Table 4: Distribution of the relation between the students’ choice about the school type (day or evening Lyceum) and self-evaluation in mathematics during the primary school In table 4 we can see that: a) From the 24 students who decided to continue their education to a day Lyceum, the 12(50%) declared that they had self-evaluated in primary school mathematics as ”good”.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Highland Park Public Schools Highland Park, New Jersey Mission Statement
    HIGHLAND PARK PUBLIC SCHOOLS HIGHLAND PARK, NEW JERSEY MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Highland Park School District is to provide the community with the finest educational services through respect for diversity and commitment to collaboration, continuous improvement, and achievement of excellence. The Highland Park Board of Education will hold a REGULAR PUBLIC MEETING on Monday, September 19, 2016, at 6:30 p.m., at the Middle School, 330 Wayne Street, Highland Park, New Jersey. This meeting will be broadcast live on hpschools.net and youtube.com. AGENDA: 1. Call to Order 2. Announcement of Notice The New Jersey Open Public Meetings Act was enacted to ensure the right of the public to have advance notice of and to attend the meetings of the public bodies at which any business affecting their interest is discussed or acted upon. In compliance with the Open Public Meeting Act, the Highland Park Board of Education has caused notice of this meeting setting forth the time, date, and location to be submitted for publication to the Home News Tribune and Star Ledger and posted on the Board’s website at least 48 hours in advance of this meeting. Members of the public who wish to address the Board will be given the opportunity to do so before the Board adjourns for the evening. 3. Roll Call 4. Recess to Executive Session Be It Resolved, pursuant to the Sunshine Act, N.J.S.A. 10:4-12 and 13, the Highland Park Board of Education will now meet in closed session to discuss litigation. This exemption is permitted to be discussed in closed session in accordance with N.J.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Are All Four-Day School Weeks Created Equal? a National Assessment of Four-Day School Week Policy Adoption and Implementation*
    Are All Four-Day School Weeks Created Equal? A National Assessment of Four-Day School Week Policy Adoption and Implementation* Paul N. Thompson* John M. Schuna Jr. Assistant Professor of Economics Assistant Professor of Kinesiology School of Public Policy School of Biological and Population Health Oregon State University Sciences 340 Bexell Hall Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97331 118H Milam Hall Corvallis, OR 97331 Katherine Gunter Emily J. Tomayko Professor and Extension Specialist Assistant Professor of Research School of Biological and Population Health Center for American Indian and Rural Health Sciences Equity Oregon State University Montana State University 247 Hallie E. Ford Center 308 Reid Hall Corvallis, OR 97331 Bozeman, MT 59715 Abstract: Four-day school weeks are used in over 1,600 schools across 24 states, but little is known about adoption and implementation of these types of school calendars. Through examinations of school calendars and correspondence with school districts, we have compiled the most complete four-day school week dataset to date. We use this unique database to conduct a comprehensive analysis of four-day school week policy adoption and implementation. We find adoption of four-day school weeks is often financially-motivated, and has generally remained a small, rural district phenomenon. These schedules feature a day off once a week – often Friday – with increased time in school on each of the remaining four school days that, on average, is nearly an hour longer than the national average among five-day schools. Four-day school week schedules average only 148 yearly school days, yielding yearly time in school that is below the national average for five-day schools despite the longer school days.
    [Show full text]
  • NAFSA08-Germany
    GERMANY ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION GENERAL INFORMATION: Location: Germany is located in Central Western Europe. It is surrounded by the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Switzerland, Austria, Czech Republic, and Poland. In the North, Germany borders with the North Sea, Denmark, and Baltic Sea. Language(s) of Instruction: German Grading Scales: Generally, the conventional six-mark scale is used in individual student assessment in schools. The 15-point scale is used on the Zeugnis der allgemeinen Hochschulreife (Certificate of General University Maturity) awarded upon successful completion of a pre-university upper secondary school (Gymnasium) program. Conventional Gymnasiale Oberstufe (Higher Description six-mark scale Gymnasium Level) point system sehr gut (very good) well above required 1 13 – 15 standard 2 10 – 12 gut (good) fully meets required standard befriedigend (satisfactory) generally 3 7 – 9 meets the required standard ausreichend (adequate) generally meets 4 4 – 6 required standard, but with some deficiencies mangelhaft (poor) does not meet the required standard, but the basic 5 1-3 knowledge is there and deficiencies may be made up with time ungenügend (insufficient) deficiencies 6 0 too incomplete to make them up in a reasonable period of time Principal educational authority: The responsibilities of the Federal Government in education are defined in theGrundgesetz (Basic Law). Based on the Basic Law, education in each Land (state) is regulated by the appropriate administrative and legislative state authorities. Each state has its own Ministry of Education, regional, and local educational authorities. Educational reforms are implemented at the state level but discussed at the federal level through the Kultusministerkonferenz (Conference of Ministers for Education and Cultural Affairs)ю Academic Calendar: School year lasts 188 – 208 days (five-six day weeks) from August to July.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Education Eligibility Q & A
    SPECIAL EDUCATION ELIGIBILITY Q & A What is a Case Study Evaluation? Page 1 How does a Child Become Eligible for Special Education? Pages 2 - 3 What is an IEP? Pages 3 - 4 How is an IEP Developed? Page 4 What are Educational Placement Options? Page 5 WHAT IS A CASE STUDY EVALUATION? A case study evaluation encompasses a series of in-depth multidisciplinary diagnostic procedures conducted within an established time frame and designed to provide information about your child and the nature of the problems that may affect his/her educational development. These components may include the following: 1. Psychological testing, including analysis of intelligence, achievement, social/emotional status and personality functioning 2. Classroom observations and teacher’s report on academic progress 3. Social/Developmental History 4. Therapeutic Summary 5. Vision/Hearing screening and other reviews of relevant health history 6. Psychiatric Evaluation, if needed 7. Substance use screening and/or evaluation, if needed 8. Occupational therapy evaluation, if needed 9. Speech & language evaluation, if needed 10. Assessment of communication skills and motor abilities, if needed The nature and intensity of each component to be included will vary depending on the needs of your child and the type of existing information available. Upon completion of your child’s case study evaluation, a staffing will be scheduled with you, representatives from the school, and any other relevant professionals to discuss the findings and determine eligibility for special education and related services. Page | 1 HOW DOES A CHILD BECOME ELIGIBLE FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION? Based on the results of the case study evaluation, there are several official categories under which a child may be found eligible for special education and related services support.
    [Show full text]
  • The Four-Day School Week: Impact on Student Academic Performance
    Rural Educator 32(2) Winter 2011 The Four-Day School Week: Impact on Student Academic Performance Paul M. Hewitt University of Arkansas George S. Denny University of Arkansas Although the four-day school week originated in 1936, it was not widely implemented until 1973 when there was a need to conserve energy and reduce operating costs. This study investigated how achievement tests scores of schools with a four-day school week compared with schools with a traditional five-day school week. The study focused on student performance in Colorado where 62 school districts operated a four-day school week. The results of the Colorado Student Assessment Program (CSAP) were utilized to examine student performance in reading, writing, and mathematics in grades 3 through 10. While the mean test scores for five-day week schools exceeded those of four-day week schools in 11 of the 12 test comparisons, the differences were slight, with only one area revealing a statistically significant difference. This study concludes that decisions to change to the four-day week should be for reasons other than student academic performance. Key words: Four-day week; rural schools; flexible scheduling; school schedules; scheduling. Johnson and Strange (2009) reported that 10,572,790 Further research is required into the extent to which the US public school students (19%) attend school in a rural increased student test scores observed in KIPP schools is school district. Howley, Theobald, and Howley (2005) due to the longer instruction time or to the culture of claimed that the mainstream of society often believes that support and high expectations for academic achievement rural schools are, by their very nature, ineffective.
    [Show full text]
  • Day to Day School and CF
    Day-to-Day School and CF earning opens pamphlet only applies Ldoors to new to the accommodations worlds and helps students may need prepare young peo- because of CF. In ple for a bright general, par- future. Many ents of a child people with cystic with CF and fibrosis (CF) have adults with CF become doctors, should try to lawyers, teachers, work with homemakers and their school engineers, or have to have their pursued careers CF needs met. in other fields. Your CF care Learning is a vital team can help part of life at all you learn more ages. Schools help about the rights of people to live, learn students with CF and enjoy each day, and how to work whether to prepare for a with your school. career or just to enjoy the process. When people with CF attend Day Care school, they may need special It may be hard permissions, services or changes for you to from the school to maintain their find day care health. For instance, some people for your child with CF may need to take medi- with CF, as cines at school without going to some day-care the nurse’s office. Others may providers may need to have a single room in a not feel confident in their ability college dorm or be permitted to to care for your child. The park their car close to an entrance. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) may help if you are having a hard This pamphlet tells you about the time finding day care for your laws that allow students to have child or if you are experiencing their medical needs met when they discrimination.
    [Show full text]
  • Application for State School Aid (ASSA) for October 2020
    State of New Jersey Department of Education Office of School Finance Application for State School Aid (ASSA) for October 2020 User Manual Table of Contents Application for State School Aid (ASSA) for October 2020 ...................................... 1 User Manual ............................................................................................................ 1 Table of Contents ..................................................................................... 2 Purpose .................................................................................................... 4 Getting Started ......................................................................................... 5 Districts ............................................................................................................... 5 Enrollment Category Descriptions ............................................................ 7 Regular Education Half Day Preschool ..................................................................... 7 Regular Education Full Day Preschool ...................................................................... 7 Regular Education Half Day Kindergarten ................................................................. 7 Regular Education Full Day Kindergarten ................................................................. 7 Post Graduate ...................................................................................................... 8 Special Education ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Honors Convocation Program
    ST. PHILIP’S COLLEGE HONORS CONVOCATION Virtual | Spring 2021 St. Philip’s College History of St. Philip's College part of East Kelly Air Force Base, was St. Philip’s College was founded in 1898 designated as an official campus of St. by Bishop James Steptoe Johnston Philip’s. The campus, which previously of St. Philip’s Episcopal Church of the had operated as a district extension West Texas Diocese. The school, which since 1975, continues to serve students opened on March 1, 1898, began as a as well as business and industry as a sewing class for girls with fewer than hub for technical training programs. 20 students in a house located in the nd area known today as the historic La Celebrating its 122 anniversary Villita area in downtown San Antonio. year, St. Philip’s College is a multi- campus institution that is continuing Artemisia Bowden, a teacher and to meet the needs of San Antonio’s daughter of a former slave, later growing and diverse community. A assumed leadership of the school. Under the direction of Miss Bowden Historically Black College and Hispanic over the ensuing 52 years, St. Serving Institution with a semester Philip’s underwent monumental enrollment of about 13,000, St. Philip’s transformation, evolving from is among the oldest and most diverse parochial day school to industrial community colleges in the nation and school to a fully accredited two-year one of the fastest growing in Texas. college offering a diverse curriculum. Changes included a move in 1917 Mission from the school’s original site to a new location just east of downtown, and St.
    [Show full text]
  • SEVP-Certified Schools in AL, AR, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, TN, TX, SC, and VA
    Student and Exchange Visitor Program U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement FOIA 13-15094 Submitted to SEVP FOIA March 7, 2013 Summary The information presented in the tables below contains the names of SEVP-certified schools located in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, South Carolina and Virginia that have received certification or are currently in the SEVP approval process, between January 1, 2012 -February 28, 2013, to include the date that each school received certification. The summary counts for the schools are as follows: Count of schools School certifications Certification type approved in duration * currently in process * Initial 127 87 Recertification 773 403 (*) In the requested states Initials Approved School Code School Name State Approval Date ATL214F52444000 Glenwood School ALABAMA 1/17/2013 ATL214F52306000 Restoration Academy ALABAMA 11/28/2012 ATL214F51683000 Eastwood Christian School ALABAMA 9/12/2012 ATL214F51988000 Tuscaloosa Christian School ALABAMA 9/11/2012 ATL214F51588000 Bayside Academy ALABAMA 7/27/2012 NOL214F51719000 Bigelow High School ARKANSAS 11/1/2012 NOL214F52150000 Booneville Public Schools ARKANSAS 9/27/2012 NOL214F52461000 Westside High School ARKANSAS 1/22/2013 NOL214F52156000 Charleston High School ARKANSAS 10/22/2012 NOL214F52133000 Atkins Public Schools ARKANSAS 9/19/2012 MIA214F52212000 Barnabas Christian Academy FLORIDA 1/2/2013 MIA214F51178000 The Potter's House Christian Academy FLORIDA 1/10/2012 MIA214F52155000 Conchita Espinosa Academy FLORIDA 11/6/2012 MIA214F52012000 St. Michael Lutheran School FLORIDA 11/14/2012 MIA214F52128000 Calvary Christian Academy FLORIDA 11/16/2012 MIA214F51412000 Hillsborough Baptist School FLORIDA 9/19/2012 MIA214F52018000 Saint Paul's School FLORIDA 10/18/2012 MIA214F52232000 Citrus Park Christian School FLORIDA 12/14/2012 MIA214F52437000 AEF Schools FLORIDA 1/9/2013 MIA214F51721000 Electrolysis Institute of Tampa, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • All Saints' Day School Student Sam Schaeffer Wins at California History Day; Advances to Nationals at University of Maryland
    for immediate release ALL SAINTS’ DAY SCHOOL STUDENT SAM SCHAEFFER WINS AT CALIFORNIA HISTORY DAY; ADVANCES TO NATIONALS AT UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND IN JUNE ALL SAINTS’ STUDENTS TYLER IMAMURA AND WILL HAND ALSO RECEIVE AWARDS CARMEL, CA • MAY 7, 2018 • All Saints’ Day School seventh grader Sam Schaeffer ‘19 is a California History Day winner. Sam is the fifth All Saints’ student in eight years to advance to the National History Day competition. Schaeffer was named California State Co-Champion in the 2018 NHD-CA in Rocklin, May 5-6, for his project “Rioting for Reform: The 1971 Attica Prison Riot Conflict & Compromise in Prison Reform” in the individual junior documentary category. Over 1,000 students from all over California participated in the NHD-CA state contest this weekend. Sam will represent the state of California and All Saints’ Day School in Maryland June 10-14, 2018, at the National History Day Competition at the University of Maryland, College Park. Tyler Imamura was named Runner Up for his project “The 442nd Regimental Combat Team: Fighting Injustice and the Enemy” in the individual junior historical paper category. He also received a special award from the Japanese American National Museum. Will Hand received an Honorable Mention for his project “The Norwegian Resistance during WWII” in the individual junior website division. He was also awarded the European History Award. Fellow All Saints’ students Alex-Gianola Cook and Jim Moreau were also finalists. Forbes Keaton and Kevin Day, the History Day Advisors at All Saints’ Day School, both recognized and applauded the wide variety of projects, the depth of research conducted, and the eagerness of the students to further improve on their chosen topics.
    [Show full text]
  • Preschool Application
    Preschool Application Park Cities Baptist Church Day School www.pcbcdayschool.org | [email protected] 3933 Northwest Highway | Dallas, Texas 75225 | (214) 860-1521 Licensed Child Care Program Number: 860696 Park Cities Baptist Church Day School PCBC Day School is a ministry of Park Cities Baptist Church that provides quality early childhood education and care for the community of Dallas and surrounding areas through a stimulating, loving Christian environment and a curriculum of active learning that nurtures the growth of the whole child. It is our purpose to prepare each child for the next level of learning and growing cognitively, emotionally, socially, physically and spiritually. Application Process ñ Enrollment is available throughout the school year, if space is available. When a class is full, an applicant will be placed on the waitlist and considered for enrollment in the order the application is received, with priority given as follows: current students, teacher’s children, siblings of current students, PCBC church members and community members. The class make-up will also be considered. ñ Infants: Must be at least 8 weeks old before attending PCBC Day School. If you plan to enroll a newborn but you want the baby to start at a date later than August 30th, you must register and pay all regularly scheduled tuition payments due as of the enrollment date to hold your child’s spot. If you elect to be placed on the waiting list and not pay tuition to hold the spot, the child will only be enrolled when an opening becomes available. ñ Non-Discriminatory Statement: PCBC Day School admits students without regard to race, color, national and ethnic origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Boarding Parent Manual
    Table of Contents SCHOOL DATES FOR WILDERNESS STUDENTS FOR 2019 ....................................................................... 4 BOARDING HOUSE OFFICE CONTACT NUMBERS ................................................................................... 4 BOARDING HOUSE OFFICE POSTAL ADDRESS ........................................................................................ 4 WELCOME .............................................................................................................................................. 5 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 6 BOARDING HOUSE ORGANISATION ....................................................................................................... 7 ROLE OF STAFF ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Head of Boarding .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Boarding House Assistant ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Senior Staff ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Chefs ....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]