Life History and Demographic Parameters of Aphis Fabae
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cis-Jasmone Induces Arabidopsis Genes That Affect the Chemical
cis-Jasmone induces Arabidopsis genes that affect SPECIAL FEATURE the chemical ecology of multitrophic interactions with aphids and their parasitoids Toby J. A. Bruce, Michaela C. Matthes, Keith Chamberlain, Christine M. Woodcock, Abdul Mohib, Ben Webster, Lesley E. Smart, Michael A. Birkett, John A. Pickett*, and Johnathan A. Napier Rothamsted Research, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom Edited by Jerrold Meinwald, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, and approved February 12, 2008 (received for review November 5, 2007) It is of adaptive value for a plant to prepare its defenses when a their defense systems accordingly, as suggested by Karban et threat is detected, and certain plant volatiles associated with insect al. (5). damage, such as cis-jasmone (CJ), are known to switch-on defense CJ is released naturally from insect-damaged plants. Cotton metabolism. We used aphid and aphid parasitoid responses to leaves damaged by Spodoptera exigua larvae emit CJ (14), and it Arabidopsis thaliana as a model system for studying gene expres- is systemically released from undamaged leaves (15). Cotton sion and defense chemistry and its impact at different trophic buds damaged by Helicoverpa zea larvae (16) emit CJ, and it is levels. Differential responses to volatiles of induced Arabidopsis also emitted from Nicotiana in response to oral secretions from occurred for specialist and generalist insects: the generalist aphid, Manduca sexta larvae (17) and by maize plants exposed to oral Myzus persicae, was repelled, whereas the specialist, Lipaphis secretions of Spodoptera littoralis (18). Recently, our understand- erysimi, was attracted; the generalist aphid parasitoid Aphidius ing of the biosynthetic pathway that leads to CJ has been ervi was attracted, but the specialist parasitoid Diaeretiella rapae improved (19) by elucidation of a novel pathway from 12-oxo- was not affected. -
Aphis Fabae Scop.) to Field Beans ( Vicia Faba L.
ANALYSIS OF THE DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE BLACK BEAN APHID ( APHIS FABAE SCOP.) TO FIELD BEANS ( VICIA FABA L.) BY JESUS ANTONIO SALAZAR, ING. AGR. ( VENEZUELA ) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON OCTOBER 1976 IMPERIAL COLLEGE FIELD STATION, SILWOOD PARK, SUNNINGHILL, ASCOT, BERKSHIRE. 2 ABSTRACT The concept of the economic threshold and its importance in pest management programmes is analysed in Chapter I. The significance of plant responses or compensation in the insect-injury-yield relationship is also discussed. The amount of damage in terms of yield loss that results from aphid attack, is analysed by comparing the different components of yield in infested and uninfested plants. In the former, plants were infested at different stages of plant development. The results showed that seed weights, pod numbers and seed numbers in plants infested before the flowering period were significantly less than in plants infested during or after the period of flower setting. The growth pattern and growth analysis in infested and uninfested plants have shown that the rate of leaf production and dry matter production were also more affected when the infestations occurred at early stages of plant development. When field beans were infested during the flowering period and afterwards, the aphid feeding did not affect the rate of leaf and dry matter production. There is some evidence that the rate of leaf area production may increase following moderate aphid attack during this period. The relationship between timing of aphid migration from the wintering host and the stage of plant development are shown to be of considerable significance in determining the economic threshold for A. -
Distribution, Hosts and Biology of Diaeretiella Rapae (M'intosh
Pakistan J. Zool., vol. 44(5), pp. 1307-1315, 2012. Distribution, Hosts and Biology of Diaeretiella rapae (M’Intosh) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae) in Punjab, Pakistan Imran Bodlah,* Muhammad Naeem and Ata Ul Mohsin Department of Entomology, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Abstract .- Diaeretiella rapae (M’Intosh) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Aphidiinae ) aphid parasitoid is reported from various districts of Punjab Province of Pakistan from a wide range of host aphids and plant associations, including some new evidences. Biological information centered development, life-stages and their micrographes, mating and oviposition, adult lon gevity and food have been discussed. Biology of the parasitoid reared on Myzus persicae aphids in the laboratory at 23±1°C have been discussed. The development cycle from larva to adult was completed in about 11.5 days at 21-23°C. The pre-mating period of males (n=10) varied between 20 and 40 minutes (mean: 28.8 min), however it was longer in females most of which rejected all copulatory attempts at least two hours after emergence . When newly emerged females were confined with males for a period of 12 h, all mated i.e., they produced progeny of both sexes. Copulation time (n = 10 pairs) was between 30 and 60 s (mean: 46.3 s). Oviposition time (n = 10 females) was between 46 and 64 s (mean: 52.6 s). Female lived longer (11.1± 0.16 days) than males (9.4 ± 0.18 days) when offered honey and water. The lifespan of adult females was shorter (10.2 ± 0.05 days) in the presence of host aphids and host plant leaves than only with honey and water. -
Arab Journal of Plant Protection
Under the Patronage of H.E. the President of the Council of Ministers, Lebanon Arab Journal of Plant Protection Volume 27, Special Issue (Supplement), October 2009 Abstracts Book 10th Arab Congress of Plant Protection Organized by Arab Society for Plant Protection in Collaboration with National Council for Scientific Research Crowne Plaza Hotel, Beirut, Lebanon 26-30 October, 2009 Edited by Safaa Kumari, Bassam Bayaa, Khaled Makkouk, Ahmed El-Ahmed, Ahmed El-Heneidy, Majd Jamal, Ibrahim Jboory, Walid Abou-Gharbieh, Barakat Abu Irmaileh, Elia Choueiri, Linda Kfoury, Mustafa Haidar, Ahmed Dawabah, Adwan Shehab, Youssef Abu-Jawdeh Organizing Committee of the 10th Arab Congress of Plant Protection Mouin Hamze Chairman National Council for Scientific Research, Beirut, Lebanon Khaled Makkouk Secretary National Council for Scientific Research, Beirut, Lebanon Youssef Abu-Jawdeh Member Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon Leila Geagea Member Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Holy Spirit University- Kaslik, Lebanon Mustafa Haidar Member Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon Walid Saad Member Pollex sal, Beirut, Lebanon Samir El-Shami Member Ministry of Agriculture, Beirut, Lebanon Elia Choueiri Member Lebanese Agricultural Research Institute, Tal Amara, Zahle, Lebanon Linda Kfoury Member Faculty of Agriculture, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon Khalil Melki Member Unifert, Beirut, Lebanon Imad Nahal Member Ministry of Agriculture, Beirut, -
Aphidophagous Parasitoids Can Forage Wheat Crops Before Aphid
Journal of Insect Science SHORT COMMUNICATION Aphidophagous Parasitoids can Forage Wheat Crops Before Aphid Infestation, Parana State, Brazil Orcial Ceolin Bortolotto,1,2 Ayres de Oliveira Menezes Ju´nior,2 and Adriano Thibes Hoshino2 1Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] 2State University of Londrina, Department of Agronomy, CEP: 86051-990, Highway Celso Garcia Cid, Londrina, Parana, Brazil Subject Editor: Inon Scharf J. Insect Sci. 15(40): 2015; DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/iev027 ABSTRACT. Aphid parasitoids are common in Brazilian wheat fields, and parasitize aphids at the wheat tillering stage. However, there is little information available about when this natural enemy occurs in wheat crops. This study investigated the initial occurrence of aphid parasitoids in four commercial wheat crops in northern Parana´ during the 2009 crop season. We installed two Malaise traps at each wheat farm, and 400 tillers were assessed weekly in each field for aphid abundance. During this study, we captured 4,355 aphid parasit- oids and 197 aphids. Three species of braconid parasitoids were identified, including Aphidius colemani (Viereck 1912), Lysiphlebus testaceipes (Cresson 1880), and Diaeretiella rapae (McIntosh 1855). The aphids species identified were Rhopalosiphum padi (Linnaeus 1758) and Sitobion avenae (Fabricius 1775). This study showed that aphid parasitoids are present in wheat crops even when aphid densities are low, and in one farm, occurred before the aphids colonization. These reports can justified the high efficiency of these natural enemies against aphids in wheat fields. Key Words: Microhymenopterans, population dynamics, natural biological control, wheat pests, Aphidiinae Aphidophagous parasitoids, which are found in many regions of the us to estimate the moment that aphid parasitoids appeared in wheat world, help to regulate aphid populations in wheat crops (Adisu et al. -
E0020 Common Beneficial Arthropods Found in Field Crops
Common Beneficial Arthropods Found in Field Crops There are hundreds of species of insects and spi- mon in fields that have not been sprayed for ders that attack arthropod pests found in cotton, pests. When scouting, be aware that assassin bugs corn, soybeans, and other field crops. This publi- can deliver a painful bite. cation presents a few common and representative examples. With few exceptions, these beneficial Description and Biology arthropods are native and common in the south- The most common species of assassin bugs ern United States. The cumulative value of insect found in row crops (e.g., Zelus species) are one- predators and parasitoids should not be underes- half to three-fourths of an inch long and have an timated, and this publication does not address elongate head that is often cocked slightly important diseases that also attack insect and upward. A long beak originates from the front of mite pests. Without biological control, many pest the head and curves under the body. Most range populations would routinely reach epidemic lev- in color from light brownish-green to dark els in field crops. Insecticide applications typical- brown. Periodically, the adult female lays cylin- ly reduce populations of beneficial insects, often drical brown eggs in clusters. Nymphs are wing- resulting in secondary pest outbreaks. For this less and smaller than adults but otherwise simi- reason, you should use insecticides only when lar in appearance. Assassin bugs can easily be pest populations cannot be controlled with natu- confused with damsel bugs, but damsel bugs are ral and biological control agents. -
Multifaceted Determinants of Host Specificity in an Aphid Parasitoid
Oecologia (2009) 160:387–398 DOI 10.1007/s00442-009-1289-x BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL PAPER Multifaceted determinants of host specificity in an aphid parasitoid Nicolas Desneux Æ Ruth J. Barta Æ Kim A. Hoelmer Æ Keith R. Hopper Æ George E. Heimpel Received: 29 August 2008 / Accepted: 8 January 2009 / Published online: 14 February 2009 Ó Springer-Verlag 2009 Abstract The host specificity of insect parasitoids and was found in one species (Aphis craccivora), and evidence herbivores is thought to be shaped by a suite of traits that for the toxic plant hypothesis was found for the milkweed mediate host acceptance and host suitability. We conducted aphids Aphis asclepiadis and Aphis nerii. This research laboratory experiments to identify mechanisms shaping the highlights the multifaceted nature of factors determining host specificity of the aphid parasitoid Binodoxys commu- host specificity in parasitoids. nis. Twenty species of aphids were exposed to B. communis females in microcosms, and detailed observations and Keywords Host range Á Specialization Á rearing studies of 15 of these species were done to deter- Preference-performance hypothesis Á Oviposition Á mine whether patterns of host use resulted from variation in Binodoxys communis factors such as host acceptance or variation in host suit- ability. Six species of aphids exposed to B. communis showed no signs of parasitism. Four of these species were Introduction not recognized as hosts and two effectively defended themselves from attack by B. communis. Other aphid spe- The host range of insect parasitoids and herbivores may cies into which parasitoids laid eggs had low suitability as include only a single species for extreme specialists or it may hosts. -
A Novel RNA Virus in the Parasitoid Wasp Lysiphlebus Fabarum: Genomic Structure, Prevalence, and Transmission
viruses Article A Novel RNA Virus in the Parasitoid Wasp Lysiphlebus fabarum: Genomic Structure, Prevalence, and Transmission 1,2, , 1,2 1,2, Martina N. Lüthi * y , Christoph Vorburger and Alice B. Dennis z 1 Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland; [email protected] (C.V.); [email protected] (A.B.D.) 2 Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 133, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland * Correspondence: [email protected] Current address: Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Altenbergrain 21, 3013 Bern, Switzerland. y Current address: Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Strasse z 24–25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany. Received: 17 November 2019; Accepted: 31 December 2019; Published: 3 January 2020 Abstract: We report on a novel RNA virus infecting the wasp Lysiphlebus fabarum, a parasitoid of aphids. This virus, tentatively named “Lysiphlebus fabarum virus” (LysV), was discovered in transcriptome sequences of wasps from an experimental evolution study in which the parasitoids were allowed to adapt to aphid hosts (Aphis fabae) with or without resistance-conferring endosymbionts. Based on phylogenetic analyses of the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), LysV belongs to the Iflaviridae family in the order of the Picornavirales, with the closest known relatives all being parasitoid wasp-infecting viruses. We developed an endpoint PCR and a more sensitive qPCR assay to screen for LysV in field samples and laboratory lines. These screens verified the occurrence of LysV in wild parasitoids and identified the likely wild-source population for lab infections in Western Switzerland. Three viral haplotypes could be distinguished in wild populations, of which two were found in the laboratory. -
On Cultivars of Irrigated Oat (Avena Spp.) in São Carlos, Brazil
163 Vol.47, n. 2 : pp. 163-169, June 2004 ISSN 1516-8913 Printed in Brazil BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL Occurrence and Parasitism of Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on Cultivars of Irrigated Oat ( Avena spp.) in São Carlos, Brazil ∗ Júlio Cesar Ronquim 1 , Josué Marques Pacheco 2 and Carlos Cesar Ronquim 1 1 Departamento de Botânica ; Laboratório de Fisiologia Vegetal; 2 Departamento de Ecologia e Biologia Evolutiva ; Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde; Universidade Federal de São Carlos; 13565-905; São Carlos - São Paulo - Brazil ABSTRACT The interactions between aphids and their Hymenopteran parasitoids on irrigated oats as well as the response of different cultivars of cereals regarding the resistance to these aphids and the influence on the host/parasitoid relationships were studied during two years in São Carlos , Brazil. Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) was the predominant aphid observed throughout the study , while the other species were rarely found. Five species of parasitic Hymenoptera were found: three primary parasitoids , Lysiphlebus testaceipes (Cresson ), Aphidius colemani (Viereck) and Diaeretiella rapae (M’Intosh) and two hyperparasitoids , Syrphophagus aphidivorus (Myer) and Alloxysta brassicae (Ashmead). The UPF 86081 cultivar presented significant results regarding lower Rhopalosiphum padi contamination and higher aphid parasitism rates than those observed on some other cultivars. No significant effect on the percentage variation of parasitoid emergence on the mummified aphids was -
Aphids: Those Sucking Insects
Aphids: those sucking insects Erin W. Hodgson Extension Entomologist Utah State University Utah Green Conference Sandy, Utah; 24 January 2007 Outline • Background and key characters • Host-plant relationships • Aphid biology and life cycle • Geographical distribution • Most common aphid pests • Control options • Where to get more information Definitions • Heteroecious – alternating between hosts • Monoecious – remains on one host • Holocyclic – Complete life cycle, goes through sexual reproduction • Anholocyclic – always remains asexual More definitions • Alatae – winged insect • Apterae – wingless insect • Parthenogenesis – reproduction from unfertilized eggs by unmated females • Viviparous – giving birth to live young • Oviviparous – giving birth by laying eggs Aphid background • More than 4,400 species of aphids • Related to scales, cicadas, hoppers – Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae • Aphids can feed on all plant parts • Most aphids use trees or woody hosts – Trees slow to develop resistance • Most aphid pests are exotic Key aphid characters • Aphids are soft-bodied, “weak” •Most are <3mm long • Head is pointed downward for feeding • Antennae are 5- or 6-segmented • Compound and simple eyes • Walking legs, “skinny” More aphid characters • Thorax and abdomen appear fused • Most aphids have cornicles (tail pipes) – Excrete alarm pheromones • Most aphids have a cauda –“flick”honeydew Host-plant relationships • Most aphids feed within 1 plant family • Some aphids are host-alternating (10%) – Primary woody plants in the fall/winter/spring -
Phaseolus Vulgaris
Potential Heritable Aphid Tolerance and Resistance in Phaseolus vulgaris _____________________________________________________ A Major Qualifying Project Report Submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By Jeannette Gerry Poonam Barot _____________________________________________________ Submitted to Professor Lauren Mathews Professor Michael Buckholt Date: April 29, 2014 This report represents work of WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its web site without editorial or peer review. For more information about the projects program at WPI, see http://www.wpi.edu/Academics/Project Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 2 Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Coevolution ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Coevolutionary Relationships -
Chemical Ecology of Aphid-Transmitted Plant Viruses
Vector-Mediated Transmission of Plant Pathogens J. K. Brown, ed. Copyright © 2016 The American Phytopathological Society. All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-0-89054-535-5 CHAPTER 1 Chemical Ecology of Aphid-Transmitted Plant Viruses Sanford D. Eigenbrode Effects of Virus-Infected Hosts Nilsa A. Bosque-Pérez on Aphid Performance and Behavior Department of Plant, Soil and Entomological Sciences In a seminal paper, J. S. Kennedy (1951) reported that Aphis University of Idaho, Moscow, U.S.A. fabae Scopoli (Hemiptera: Aphidae) colonies grew more rap- idly and individual aphids produced more offspring on leaves of various ages of their host plant, Beta vulgaris L., infected with an Most described plant viruses require vectors for transmis- undetermined virus compared with noninfected control plants. sion between host plants. The epidemiology of such viruses is Aphid reproduction was 1.4 times greater on the infected plants, therefore largely dependent upon the population dynamics, leading to greater crowding and increased emigration. Profes- long- and short-range dispersal, and host-selection and feed- sor Kennedy (1951; page 825) somewhat conservatively stated, ing behaviors of the vectors. This dependency sets the stage for “The epidemiological and evolutionary consequences, for both complex direct and indirect interactions involving the plant, vi- virus and vector, invite further attention… .” rus, and vector. Thus, the ecology and evolution of virus, vector, Since this report, the effects of virus-infected plants on and host plant are closely