DOCSLIB.ORG

Industrial Resources: Bullitt County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Bullitt ounC ty Industrial Reports for Kentucky Counties 1973 Industrial Resources: Bullitt ounC ty - Shepherdsville, Mt. Washington, and Lebanon Junction Kentucky Library Research Collections Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/bullitt_cty Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Growth and Development Commons, and the Infrastructure Commons Recommended Citation Kentucky Library Research Collections, "Industrial Resources: Bullitt ounC ty - Shepherdsville, Mt. Washington, and Lebanon Junction" (1973). Bullitt County. Paper 11. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/bullitt_cty/11 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bullitt ounC ty by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. L/i D;1*^ Din ' SHEPHERDSVILLE, HST. WASHINGTON & LEBANON JUNCTION, KENTUCKY NEW YORK EPHERDSY LLE ^So DALLAS 500 mlU> BULL in COUNTY, KENTUCKY CURRENT INDUST® CURRENT INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES, SHEPHERDSVILLE, MT. WASHINGTON AND LEBANON JUNCTION, KENTUCKY This is a 1974 supplement to "Industrial Resources, Shepherdsville, Mt. Washington, Lebanon Junction, Kentucky" which was published in 1973. Population 1972 1970 I960 (Provisional) Shepherdsville N. A. 2, 769 1, 525 Mt. Washington N. A. 2, 020 1, 173 Lebanon Junction N. A. 1, 571 1, 527 Bullitt County 29.100 26,090 15,726 Labor Market Area 843,400 828,531 722,310 (Includes Bullitt, Hardin, Jefferson, Nelson, and Spencer Counties.) General Employment Characteristics Employment 1972 Industry Bullitt County Labor Market Area TOTAL 4, 190 386,280 Agricultural 400 4,620 Nonagricultural 3,790 381,660 Manufacturing 830 101,570 Trades and Services 908 110,199 Government 640 46,650 Other 1,412 123,241 Manufacturing Employment Bullitt County Labor Market Area Sept. Sept. Sept. Sept. Type Industry 1973 1963 %Change 1973 1963 %Change TOTAL 926 724 + 27. 9 109,292 81,910 + 33.4 Food & Kindred Products 682 611 + 11.6 11,537 13,368 -13. 7 Tobacco 0 0 0 11,225 8,676 + 29.4 Apparel, Textiles, Leather 0 0 0 2,423 2,479 - 2. 3 Lumber, Furniture 13 9 + 44.4 4,395 4,982 -11.8 Printing & Publishing, Paper 160 100 60. 0 9,765 6,646 +46. 9 Chemicals, Petroleum & Coal, Rubber 0 4 .-100. 0 9,440 7,448 + 26. 7 Stone, Clay & Glass 0 0 0 2, 202 2,018 + 9. 1 Primary Metals 0 0 0 2, 131 1,922 +10. 9 Machinery & Metal Products, Equipment 62 0 54,460 33,109 +64. 5 Other 9 0 1, 714 1, 262 + 35. 8 There are presently 17 manufacturing firms in Bullitt County. Major firms, employment, and year started operations: Firms Employment Year started operations Clermont James B. Bean Distilling Co, 514 1934 Shepherds ville A. J. Bayer Co. 100 N. A, Bullitt County Stone Co. 30 1967 Kentucky Solite Corporation 44 1953 Monarch Hardware Mfg. Co, 38 1965 Publishers Printing Co. 120 1866 Labor Supply Bullitt County Labor Market Area Total Male Female Total Male Female Current (1973) 1.340 470 870 48,550 21,000 27,550 Potential additions next five years 3,136 1,610* 1,526 89.121 45,378 43.743 Personal Income Bullitt County, 1971: Per Capita - $2,698 (Estimated) 1961: Per Capita - 1,241 Power and Fuel Electric Distributors Source of Supply Louisville Gas k Electric Company Louisville Gas & Electric Company Kentucky Utilities Company Kentucky Utilities Company Salt River RECC East Kentucky Power Cooperative and Lotiisville Gas & Electric Co, Natural Gas Distributor Specific Gravity Btu per cu. ft, Shepherds ville Louisville Gas & Electric Company .60 1,000 Mt. Washington Louisville Gas & Electric Co. .60 1,000 Water and Sewerage She phe rd s ville Water: Daily treatment capacity - 576,000 gallons; average daily use - 300,000 gallons; peak daily use - 500,000 gallons; storage capacity - 150,000 gallons; size distribution lines 8, 6 and 4 inches Rates; First 2,000 gallons (Minimum bill) Next 3,000 gallons 1.60 per M gallons Next 5,000 gallons 1. 30 per M gallons Next 15,000 gallons 1. 15 per M gallons Next 25,000 gallons 1. 00 per M gallons Next 50,000 gallons . 90 per M gallons Next 100,000 gallons .80 per M gallons All over 200,000 gallons .70 per M gallons Mt. Washington Water: Daily treatment capacity - 288,000 gallons; average daily use - 151,000 gallons; peak daily use - 200,000 gallons; storage capacity - 100,000 gallons; size distribution lines 8, 6 and 4 inches Rates: First 2, 000 gallons $5. 25 (Minimum) 3, 000 gallons 6. 03 4, 000 gallons 6. 83 5, 000 gallons 7. 61 • 6,000 gallons 8. o24 o 7,000 gallons 8. 87 8,000 gallons 9. 05 9, 000 gallons 10. 13 10,000 gallons 10. 76 11,000 gallons 11. 39 12,000 gallons 12. 02 13,000 gallons 12. 65 14,000 gallons 13. 28 15,000 gallons 13. 91 Industrial rates may be negotiated. Lebanon Junction Water: Daily treatment capacity - 240,000 gallons; average daily use - 130,000 gallons; peak daily use - 150,000 gallons; storage capacity - 125,000 gallons; size distribution lines 8, 6 and 4 inches* Rates: First 2, 000 gallons $2. 25 per M gallons Next 4, 000 gallons 1. 30 per M gallons Next 4,000 gallons 1. 20 per M gallons Next 5, 000 gallons 1. 10 per M gallons Next 5,000 gallons 1.00 per M gallons Next 5, 000 gallons .90 per M gallons All over 25,000 gallons .75 per M gallons *Application made for grant and loan of $745,000 to update and extend present water and sewer system. L _ She phe rds ville Sewerage: Type treatment - primary and secondary; design capacity - 300,000 gallons per day, size of sewer mains - 10 and 8 inches Rates: 80 percent of monthly water bill - East of Kentucky Turnpike-$6, 50 Mt. Washington Mt. Washington does not have a municipal sewerage system. Septic tanks are utilized. Lebanon Junction Sewerage: Treatment - Aeration and chlorination; disign capacity - 180,000 gallons per day; size of sewer mains - 8 and 10 inches Rates: One-half monthly water bill Local Government Shepherds ville Business Fees and Licenses: Occupational licenses vary from $10 to $400 per year; unloading licenses vary from $25 to $200 per year Mt. Washington Business Fees and Licenses: Occupational licenses vary from $10 to $50 per year; unloading licenses $10 per year; auto sticker $5 per year Lebanon Junction Business Fees and Licenses: Business licenses vary from $10 to $400 per year; unloading license $30. 50 per year; auto sticker $5 per year Property Tax Rates Property tax rates per $100 of assessed valuation, 1973 Lebanon Bullitt Shepherdsville Mt. Washington Junction County State $ .015 $ .015 $ .015 $ .015 County' , 169 . 169 . 169 . 169 School .526 .526 .526 .526 City .220 .230 .365 Total $ .930 $ .940 $1,075 $ .710 Special: (Not county-wide) Plum Creek #1 Watershed, $. 12; Zoneton Fire Protection, $. 05; Mt. Washington Fire District $. 035 Tax for Schools Bullitt County levies a 3 percent tax on utilities receipts for schools. INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES SHEPHERDSVILLE, MT. WASHINGTON, LEBANON JUNCTION Prepared by The Kentucky Department of Commerce in cooperation with The City of Shepherdsville The City of Mt. Washington The City of Lebanon Junction 1973 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page INDUSTRIAL SITES i SHEPHERDSVILLE. MT. WASHINGTON, LEBANON JUNCTION - A RESOURCE PROFILE 1 THE LABOR MARKET 3 Population Trends 3 General Employment Characteristics 3 Manufacturing Employment Trends by Industry 3 Bullitt County Manufacturing Firms, Their Products and Employment 4 Wage Rates for Selected Occupations - Bullitt County, Kentucky. , 5 Labor Organizations 5 Current and Future Labor Supply - Shepherdsville, Mt. Washington, and Lebanon Junction Labor Market Area . 6 Total Personal Income 6 Per Capita Personal Income 6 EDUCATION 7 Public Schools 7 Parochial Schools 7 Vocational Schools 9 Colleges and Universities 9 POWER 10 Electricity 10 WATER SUPPLY 11 Surface Water 11 Ground Water 11 COUNTY GOVERNMENT 12 County 12 Assessed Value of Property, 1971 12 Local General Property Tax Rates Per $100 of Assessed Valuation, 1971 12 iv Chapter Page Utilities Gross Receipts Tax For Schools 12 Planning and Zoning 12 Safety 13 Police 13 Fire 13 Sanitation 13 HEALTH 14 Hospitals 14 Nursing Homes 14 Public Health 14 OTHER EOCAE FACIEITIES 15 Financial Institutions , 15 Hotels and Motels 15 Community Programs for Improvement 15 RECREATION l6 Eocal 16 Area l6 AGRICULTURE - NATURAE RESOURCES - CLIMATE 17 Agriculture 17 Natural Resources 17 Climate 17 HISTORY 18 SHEPHERDSVIEEE TRANSPORTATION 19 Rail 19 Truck Service 19 Air 20 Bus 20 POWER AND FUEL 21 Electricity 21 Natural Gas 21 Other Fuels 21 V Chapter Page WATER AND SEWERAGE 22 Water 22 Sewerage 22 LOCAL GOVERNMENT 23 City 23 Assessed Value of Property, 1971 23 Local General Property Tax Rates Per $100 of Assessed Valuation, 1971 23 Safety 23 Police 23 Fire 23 Sanitation 24 OTHER LOCAL FACILITIES 25 Communications 25 Library Services 25 Religious Institutions 25 Clubs and Organizations 26 Community Programs for Improvement 26 RECREATION 27 Local 27 MT. WASHINGTON TRANSPORTATION 29 Rail 29 Truck Service 29 Air 30 Bus , 30 POWER AND FUEL 31 Electricity 31 Natural Gas 31 Other Fuels 31 VI Chapter Page WATER AND SEWERAGE 32 Water 32 Sewerage 32 LOCAL GOVERNMENT 33 City. Assessed Value of Property, 1971 33 Local General Property Tax Rates Per $100 of Assessed Valuation, 1971 33 Safety .33 Police 33 Fire 33 Sanitation 34 OTHER LOCAL FACILITIES 35 Communications 35 Library Services 35 Religious Institutions 35 Clubs and Organizations 35 Community Programs for Improvement 36 RECREATION 37 Local 37 LEBANON JUNCTION TRANSPORTATION .39 Rail Truck Service 39 Air Bus 40 POWER AND FUEL Electricity 41 Natural Gas Other Fuels VI1 Chapter Page WATER AND SEWERAGE 42 Water 42 Sewerage 42 LOCAL GOVERNMENT 43 City 43 Assessed Value of Property, 1971 43 Local General Property Tax Rates Per $100 of Assessed Valuation, 1971 43 Safety 43 Police 43 Fire 43 Sanitation 44 OTHER LOCAL FACILITIES 45 Comnaunications , .
Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 57/Friday, March 25, 2005/Rules

    Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 57/Friday, March 25, 2005/Rules

    15228 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 57 / Friday, March 25, 2005 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Impact Statement is not required. The David B. Olson, Headquarters EA may be reviewed by contacting the Department of the Army; Corps of Regulatory Branch, Washington, DC at District office listed at the end of the Engineers (202) 761–4922, or Ms. Amy S. Babey, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Corps of Engineers, Louisville District, section, above. 33 CFR Part 334 at (502) 315–6691. d. Unfunded Mandates Act SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant United States Army Danger Zone; Salt This rule does not impose an River, Rolling Fork River, and Otter to its authorities in Section 7 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1917 (40 Stat enforceable duty among the private Creek; U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Knox sector and, therefore, is not a Federal Military Reservation; Fort Knox, KY 266; 33 U.S.C. 1) and Chapter XIX, of the Army Appropriations Act of 1919 private sector mandate and is not AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, (40 Stat 892; 33 U.S.C. 3) the Corps is subject to the requirements of Section DoD. amending the danger zone regulations 202 or 205 of the Unfunded Mandates ACTION: Final rule. in 33 CFR part 334 by adding Section Act. We have also found under Section 334.855, which establishes a danger 203 of the Act, that small governments SUMMARY: The Corps of Engineers is zone in the navigable portions of Salt would not be significantly and uniquely amending its regulations to establish a River and Rolling Fork River, and non- affected by this rulemaking.
  • A Preliminary Ecological Study of Areas to Be Impounded in the Salt River Basin of Kentucky Digital Object Identifier

    A Preliminary Ecological Study of Areas to Be Impounded in the Salt River Basin of Kentucky Digital Object Identifier

    University of Kentucky UKnowledge KWRRI Research Reports Kentucky Water Resources Research Institute 9-1971 A Preliminary Ecological Study of Areas to be Impounded in the Salt River Basin of Kentucky Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.13023/kwrri.rr.43 Louis A. Krumholz University of Louisville Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits oy u. Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kwrri_reports Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Repository Citation Krumholz, Louis A., "A Preliminary Ecological Study of Areas to be Impounded in the Salt River Basin of Kentucky" (1971). KWRRI Research Reports. 152. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kwrri_reports/152 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Kentucky Water Resources Research Institute at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in KWRRI Research Reports by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Research Report No. 43 A PRELIMINARY ECOLOGICAL STUDY OF AREAS TO BE IMPOUNDED IN THE SALT RIVER BASIN OF KENTUCKY Dr. Louis A. Krumholz Principal Investigator Project Number B-005-KY Agreement Number 14-01-0001-1908 Technical Research Project Completion Report University of Louisville Water Resources Laboratory Louisville, Kentucky 40208 Tbe work on which this report is based was supported in part by funds provided by the Office of Water Resources Research, United States Depart­ ment of the Interior, as authorized under the Water Resources Research Act of 1964. September 19 71 ABSTRACT This report covers work that is an extension of Project No.
  • Kentucky Heritage Land Conservation Fund

    Kentucky Heritage Land Conservation Fund

    KENTUCKY HERITAGE LAND CONSERVATION FUND ANNUAL REPORT FY 2011 KENTUCKY HERITAGE LAND CONSERVATION FUND Kentucky has an invaluable natural heritage recognized nationally and in- ternationally for its outstanding, productive, biologically and geologically diverse lands and waters. The Kentucky Heritage Land Conservation Fund is committed to protecting these diverse lands and “Keeping Ken- tucky Green” by awarding grant funds to purchase and preserve the state’s natural lands in perpetuity for enjoyment by this and future genera- tions. Kentucky Heritage Land Conservation Fund dollars have been awarded to protect and conserve some of Kentucky’s best known natural areas: old- growth hardwoods at Blanton Forest in eastern Kentucky; savannah woodlands at Griffith Woods as well as parts of the Kentucky River Pali- sades in central Kentucky ; urban forests at the Jefferson Memorial For- est in the state’s largest city; bat populations and caves in southern Ken- tucky; cliff-lined valleys along the banks of the Martins Fork Wild River in Harlan County; and diverse watershed and wetland areas with endan- gered mussel species at the Green River State Forest in the western part of the state. On the following pages, we are pleased to present the FY 2011 Annual Report. On the Cover: Bad Branch State Nature Preserve, Letcher County Photo by Joe Dietz KHLCF FY 2011 Annual Report Table of Contents KHLCF Mission 1 KHLCF Accomplishments 2 FY 2011 in Review 3 FY 2011 Purchased Properties 4 FY 2011 Approved Projects 5 FY 2011 Financial Overview 9 Kentucky
  • Report on the Condition of the Salt River Watershed, Kentucky, Floyds Fork and the Minor Ohio River Tributaries in the Area November 1998 Upper Salt River

    Report on the Condition of the Salt River Watershed, Kentucky, Floyds Fork and the Minor Ohio River Tributaries in the Area November 1998 Upper Salt River

    State of the River A report on the condition of the Salt River watershed, Kentucky, Floyds Fork and the minor Ohio River tributaries in the area November 1998 Upper Salt River Lower Salt River INSIDE wThe Salt River Watershed and minor Ohio River tributaries wWhat is the water quality? wWhat are the Rolling Fork primary concerns? wWhat can be done? What is a watershed? Streams No matter where you live, work, or play, you are in a Streams relatively little impact on the waters within the watershed. watershed. A watershed is a geographic area where all water However, a poorly managed forest that is harvested for lumber running off the land drains to a specific location. This location may impact the watershed through soil erosion from logging Divide Minor Drainage divide may be a stream, river, lake, wetland, or ocean; or the water Watershed for larger roads. may drain underground into the groundwater. You may live on Watershed a creek, which is considered a small watershed. Your creek may Residential land includes small communities and suburban areas join a river, which is a larger watershed. The river may have many of homes. Land disturbance during construction as well as land smaller creeks, known as tributaries, that drain into it and each of changes affect the hydrology of streams. Many homes depend these tributaries has a small watershed associated with it, and each on septic tanks which are sources of bacteria, pathogens, and is part of the larger watershed of the river. nutrients. Chemicals applied to lawns, trees and shrubs by homeowners, such as fertilizers, insecticides, and herbicides, are Groundwater carried off by stormwater and may harm the quality of the water in How does land use affect the watershed? (Aquifer) the creeks or harm the animals and plants in the creek.
  • Bullitt County

    Bullitt County

    Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Bullitt ounC ty Industrial Reports for Kentucky Counties 1980 Industrial Resources: Bullitt ounC ty - Shepherdsville, Mt. Washington, and Lebanon Junction Kentucky Library Research Collections Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/bullitt_cty Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Growth and Development Commons, and the Infrastructure Commons Recommended Citation Kentucky Library Research Collections, "Industrial Resources: Bullitt ounC ty - Shepherdsville, Mt. Washington, and Lebanon Junction" (1980). Bullitt County. Paper 8. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/bullitt_cty/8 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bullitt ounC ty by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. j-f". oa.il'L'c 1 INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES tuiiirr covNrr EPARTMENT OF COMMERCE For more information contact Ronald Florence, Bullitt County Chamber Industrial Sites—1980 of Commerce, P. 0. Box 485, Shepherdsville, Kentucky 40165, or the Kentucky Department of Commerce, Industrial Development Division, Shepherdsville, Capital Plaza Tower, Frankfort, Kentucky 40601. Kentucky i/K '-J Water Tank 50.000 gall Tract I • 80 acres. \/'>^ --iSem I V/% V/'-' i SerVjjje 1// ^*2 FacllHies ^ Site 280 Site 180 w Tract 11 - 70 Acres// *5/0 II Gem Static t HANGEfS Shephferd Site 180 - 87 Acres LOCATION; Partially within
  • Appendix K-1 – Endangered Species Habitat and Wildlife Technical Report

    Appendix K-1 – Endangered Species Habitat and Wildlife Technical Report

    I-69 Ohio River Crossing Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement APPENDIX K-1 Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Species Habitat Assessment and Wildlife Technical Report Clarification Note for Central Alternative 1: Central Alternatives 1A and 1B as described in the DEIS are physically the same alternative. The only difference between them is that Central Alternative 1A would include tolls on both the new I-69 bridge and on the US 41 bridge. Central Alternative 1B would only include tolls on the new I-69 bridge. Any reference in this document to Central Alternative 1 applies to both Central Alternative 1A and Central Alternative 1B. Appendices October 15 , 2018 (1'$1*(5('7+5($7(1(' $1'5$5(63(&,(6+$%,7$7 $66(660(17 $1':,/'/,)( 7( CHNICAL 5(3257 I-69I-69 O OHIOHI O RRIVERIVER CCROSSINGROSS IN G PPROJECTROJ ECT Evansville, IN and Henderson, KY I N D O T Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Species Habitat Assessment and Wildlife Technical Report I-69 Ohio River Crossing Project Evansville, IN and Henderson, KY Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services I-69 Ohio River Crossing Project ETR Species Habitat Assessment and Wildlife Technical Report TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 1-1 West Alternative 1 ............................................................................................. 1-4 West Alternative 2 ............................................................................................. 1-6 Central Alternative 1 .......................................................................................
  • Floods of March 1964 Along the Ohio River

    Floods of March 1964 Along the Ohio River

    Floods of March 1964 Along the Ohio River GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1840-A Prepared in cooperation with the States of Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia, and with agencies of the Federal Government Floods of March 1964 Along the Ohio River By H. C. BEABER and J. O. ROSTVEDT FLOODS OF 1964 IN THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1840-A Prepared in cooperation with the States of Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia, and with agencies of the Federal Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1965 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 65 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract ------------------------------------------------------- Al Introduction.______-_-______--_____--__--_--___-_--__-_-__-__-____ 1 The storms.__---_------------__------------------------_----_--_- 6 The floods.___-__.______--____-._____.__ ._-__-.....__._____ 8 Pennsylvania.. _._-.------._-_-----___-__---_-___-_--_ ..___ 8 West Virginia.--.-._____--_--____--_-----_-----_---__--_-_-__- 11 Ohio.-.------.---_-_-_.__--_-._---__.____.-__._--..____ 11 Muskingum River basin._---___-__---___---________________ 11 Hocking River basin_______________________________________ 12 Scioto River basin______.__________________________________ 13 Little Miami River basin.__-____-_.___._-._____________.__. 13 Kentucky._.__.___.___---___----_------_--_-______-___-_-_-__
  • Marrowbone Creek State Forest a Wealth of Resources by Lynn Brammer

    Marrowbone Creek State Forest a Wealth of Resources by Lynn Brammer

    Marrowbone Creek State Forest A Wealth of Resources by Lynn Brammer Marrowbone Creek State Forest recently became Kentucky’s seventh state forest. The newly acquired property is located on the Metcalfe and Cumberland county line and is centrally located to other natural areas including Mammoth Cave National Park, Green River Lake State Park, Lake Cumberland State Park, Dale Hollow Lake State Park and Barren River Lake State Park. Visitors to the forest will find a wide variety of habitats that support diverse plant and animal communities. The tract is located in a transitional area and has a diversity of forest types. Tree species that are typical of mixed-meso- phytic forests, including oak, hickory, elm, walnut, tulip poplar, white pine, and hemlock are common to the area. The variety of habitats—from grasslands to early-successional woods to mature forests—provide forage and nesting sites for many bird species including wild turkey, ruffed grouse, red-cockaded woodpeckers and broad-winged hawks. Neotropical songbirds likewise benefit from the different successional stages of the forest and are prevalent in the area. The property also contains over nine miles of tributaries in the Green River and Cumberland River watersheds. Riparian areas, the buffer zones along these watersheds, are critical to the survival of many species located in this area. The Green River watershed is the fourth most biologically diverse aquatic ecosystem in the United States and is home to 151 species of fish and 71 species of mussels. The presence of two federally-endangered bats, the Indiana bat and the gray bat, add further significance to this property and the need for conservation and proper management.
  • Ky SCORP Survey Has Been Conducted Since Information on the Cross-Tabulations of the Survey Is Available 1979

    Ky SCORP Survey Has Been Conducted Since Information on the Cross-Tabulations of the Survey Is Available 1979

    Kentucky | Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan Outdoor Recreation in Kentucky Assessment, Policies, and Actions October 2008 1 Kentucky | Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2 Kentucky | Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan Outdoor Recreation in Kentucky Assessment, Policies, and Actions October 2008 Steve Beshear, Governor Commonwealth of Kentucky Tony Wilder, Commissioner Department for Local Government 3 Kentucky | Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 4 Kentucky | Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan Acknowledgements The Department for Local Government is grateful to the leadership and staff of the various federal, state, regional, and local agencies appearing in these pages, who worked willingly with the SCORP project staff. The project was built primarily upon the 2008 Kentucky Outdoor Recreation Participation and Sat- isfaction Survey conducted by Dr. Charlie Everett and Alin L. Tose of Eastern Kentucky University. A special thanks to the Kentucky Recreation and Park Society for gathering many of the photos found throughout the SCORP from Asbury College Adventure Programs, photographer Betty Smithart, Lexington-Fayette County Parks and Recreation Department, Louisville Metro Parks, and Kentucky State Parks. Other photographs are courtesy of the Kentucky Department of Travel (www.kentuckytoursim.com), Kentucky Office of Creative Services, and photographer David Nayes. Additional thanks to Dr. Bruce A. Larson, Dr. Fred Gibson and Dr. Raymond Poff at Western Kentucky University for compiling much useful data about local park and recreation departments through the Kentucky Recreation and Park Services Study. The assistance of the members of the Land and Water Conservation Fund State Advisory Commit- tee and the Recreational Trails Program Advisory Committee has been much appreciated. Finally, many other citizens across the state contributed some portion of their time to respond thoughtfully to survey research questions.
  • Kentucky Ancestors Genealogical Quarterly of The

    Kentucky Ancestors Genealogical Quarterly of The

    Vol. 43, No. 2 Winter 2007 Kentucky Ancestors genealogical quarterly of the Mystery Photo Solved: Certificates of Settlement The Rodgers Family and Preemption Warrants Database Sergeant Proctor Ballard Vol. 43, No. 2 Winter 2007 Kentucky Ancestors genealogical quarterly of the Don Rightmyer, Editor Dan Bundy, Graphic Design kentucky ancestors Betty Fugate, Membership Coordinator Governor Steven L. Beshear, Chancellor Robert M. "Mike" Duncan, President Robert E. Rich, 1st Vice President Bill Black, Jr., 2nd Vice President khs officers Sheila M. Burton, 3rd Vice President Walter A. Baker Richard Frymire Yvonne Baldwin Ed Hamilton William F. Brashear II John Kleber Terry Birdwhistell Ruth A. Korzenborn J. McCauley Brown Karen McDaniel Bennett Clark Ann Pennington William Engle Richard Taylor Charles English J. Harold Utley executive comittee Martha R. Francis Kent Whitworth, Executive Director Marilyn Zoidis, Assistant Director director’s office James E. Wallace, KHS Foundation Director Warren W. Rosenthal, President Dupree, Jo M. Ferguson, Ann Rosen- John R. Hall, 1st Vice President stein Giles, Frank Hamilton, Jamie Henry C. T. Richmond III, Hargrove, Raymond R. Hornback, 2nd Vice President Elizabeth L. Jones, James C. Klotter, Kent Whitworth, Secretary Crit Luallen, James H. “Mike” Mol- James Shepherd, Treasurer loy, Maggy Patterson, Erwin Roberts, Martin F. Schmidt, Gerald L. Smith, Ralph G. Anderson, Hilary J. Alice Sparks, Charles Stewart, John Boone, Lucy A. Breathitt, Bruce P. Stewart, William Sturgill, JoEtta Y. Cotton, James T. Crain Jr., Dennis Wickliffe, Buck Woodford foundation board Dorton, Clara Dupree, Thomas research and interpretation Nelson L. Dawson, Director Kentucky Ancestors (ISSN-0023-0103) is published quarterly by the Kentucky Historical Society and is distributed free to Society members.
  • A New Assessment of the Archaeological Significance of the Ashworth Site (15Bu236)

    A New Assessment of the Archaeological Significance of the Ashworth Site (15Bu236)

    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 7-1981 A new assessment of the archaeological significance of the Ashworth site (15Bu236). Philip James DiBlasi 1954- University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Recommended Citation DiBlasi, Philip James 1954-, "A new assessment of the archaeological significance of the Ashworth site (15Bu236)." (1981). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 342. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/342 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A NEW ASSESSMENT OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ASHWORTH SITE (15Bu236) A Study of the Dynamics of Archaeological Investigation in Cultural Resource Management By Philip James DiBlasi B.A., University of Louisville, 1976 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Interdisciplinary Studies University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky July 1981 A NEW ASSESSMENT OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ASHWORTH SITE (15Bu236) A Study of the Dynamics of Archaeological Investigation in Cultural Resource Management By Philip James DiBlasi B.A., University of Louisville, 1976 A Thesis Approved on August 4, 1981 by the following Reading Committee: Thesis Director Stuart E.
  • Final Site-Specific Environmental Radiation Monitoring Plan Fort Knox

    Final Site-Specific Environmental Radiation Monitoring Plan Fort Knox

    FINAL SITE-SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION MONITORING PLAN FORT KNOX, KENTUCKY ANNEX 10 FOR MATERIALS LICENSE SUC-1593, DOCKET NO. 040-09083 September 2016 Submitted By: U.S. ARMY INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT COMMAND ATTN: IMSO, Building 2261 2405 Gun Shed Road, Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78234-1223 Submitted To: U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards 11545 Rockville Pike, Two White Flint North, Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738 THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................. iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 PURPOSE .............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 INSTALLATION BACKGROUND ...................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 HISTORICAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................... 1-5 1.4 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT .............................................................................................. 1-5 1.5 EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL SOURCE-RECEPTOR INTERACTIONS ..................... 1-6 2.0 ERMP SAMPLE DESIGN ............................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT