SURVEYS OF MIGRATORY DUCKS IN JAMAICAN WETLANDS - PHASE ONE: JANUARY - APRIL 2001
Report Prepared For The Natural Resources Conservation Authority/ National Environment and Planning Agency And Ducks Unlimited By Ann Haynes Sutton Ph.D., Marshall's Pen,PO Box 58, Mandeville, Jamaica W.I. and
D. Brandon Hay Caribbean Coastal Areas Management Foundation, PO Box 33, Lionel Town, Clarendon, Jamaica W.I. January 2002
Cover Photograph shows Blue-winged Teal (male). Source Ducks Unlimited Canada by Guy Fontaine.
SURVEYS OF MIGRATORY DUCKS IN JAMAICA PHASE ONE: JANUARY - APRIL 2001
Report Prepared For The
Natural Resources Conservation Authority/ National Environment and Planning Agency And Ducks Unlimited
By
Ann Haynes Sutton Ph.D. Marshall's Pen PO Box 58 Mandeville Jamaica WI
and
D. Brandon Hay Caribbean Coastal Area Management Foundation PO Box 33, Lionel Town Clarendon Jamaica WI
January 2002
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 ...... ObjectivesObjectives 1
2.0 ...... BackgroundBackground 1
3.0 MethoMethodsdsds...... 22 3.1 Literature Search...... 2 3.2 Examination of Museum Specimens...... 2 3.3 Analysis of Band Recoveries ...... 2 3.4 Aerial Surveys ...... 2 3.5 Terrestrial Surveys - Ground truthing...... 3
4.0 Results ...... 5 4.1 Species and relative abundance...... 5 4.2 Seasonality and movements ...... 6 4.3 Geographical distribution ...... 10 4.4 Areas of special importance to ducks ...... 11 4.5 Size of pond or wetland unit ...... 12 4.6 Vegetation...... 12 4.7 Habitat use...... 13 4.8 Threats...... 13
5.0 Discussion ...... 14 5.1 Population size seasonal movements and relative abundance of species...... 14
5.2 Population trends ...... 15 5.3 Seasonality and movements ...... 15 5.4 Geographical distribution and habitat use ...... 16 5.5 Threats...... 16 5.6 Assessment of methods...... 21
6.0 RECOMMENDATIONSRECOMMENDATIONS...... 22 6.1 Conservation of species ...... 22 6.2 Conservation of habitats ...... 22 6.3 Public education ...... 23 6.4 Hunting...... 23 6.5 Ban on use of lead shot ...... 24 6.6 Directions for future monitoring and research...... 24
Literature CitedCited...... 2626
Appendices 1. Terms of Reference ...... 28 2. Raw data from aerial surveys ...... 29 3. Raw data from terrestrial ground truth surveys, January-April 2001...... 38 4. Results of ad hoc duck counts at Great Pedro Pond...... 39 5. Specimens of ducks from the Institute of Jamaica ...... 40
6. Actual and potential sources of error and how they were addressed ...... 41 7. Records of duck observations contained in the Gosse Bird Club Broadsheet...... 42 8. A working inventory of wetland and water bodies in Jamaica...... 45 9. Aerial photographs of selected Wetland habitats……………………………….51 10. Photographs of survey activities………………………………………………….55 11. Ducks of the West Indies…………………………………………………………56
Abbreviations Used In The Text BWTE Blue-winged Teal DU Ducks Unlimited NEPA National Environment and Planning Agency NGO Non-government organisation NRCA Natural Resources Conservation Authority NSHO Northern Shoveler SCO Society of Caribbean Ornithology WIWD West Indian Whistling Duck
LListist Of Tables
Table 1 List of ducks observed in Jamaica ...... 1 Table 2 Dates and routes of aerial surveys ...... 3 Table 3 Monthly observation of ducks in aerial survey, Jan-Apr 2001 ...... 6 Table 4 Ponds size and duck distribution...... 12 Table 5 Vegetation use by ducks - spring 2001 ...... 13 Table 6 Water body use by ducks...... 13 Table 7 Condition of selected duck habitats...... 13
List Of Figures
Figure 1 Number of recoveries in Jamaica of foreign banded ducks
1962-1994 5 Figure 2 Great Pedro Pond - comparison of air and ground counts ...... 6 Figure 3 Number of Blue-winged Teal by month from aerial surveys...... 7 Figure 4 Number of Northern Shoveler by month from aerial surveys...... 7 Figure 5 Rainfall SW Portland Bight Spring 2001 ...... 8 Figure 6 Number of band recoveries by month...... 8 Figure 7 Seasonality of observation of ducks at selected sites...... 10 Figure 8 Sizes of groups of duck spring 2001 ...... 11 Figure 9 Recoveries of banded ducks 1962 - 1994 by location ...... 12
List of Maps
Map 1 Duck survey routes and places where ducks were seen …………………4 Map 2 Origins of Blue-winged Teal recovered in Jamaica……………………...8
List of Plates
Plate 1 Caymanas Dyke Ponds Plate 2 Long Island Plate 3 Hellshire Flashes Plate 4 West Harbour Plate 5 Jackson’s Bay Plate 6 Rio Minho Plate 7 Great Pedro Pond Plate 8 Effects of fire – Black River Lower Morass Plate 9 Lacovia Plate 10 Parottee Pond - dry Plate 11 Ganja Cultivation – Black River
Plate 12 Black River Lower Morass – swamp forest Plate 13 Baptist Pond Black River Lower Morass Plate 14 Negril Morass Plate 15 Cabaritta Canal, Westmoreland Plate 16 Montpelier Plate 17 South Negril River Plate 18 Chatham – Montego Bay Plate 19 Annotto Bay River Plate 20 Mitchell Town Ponds Plate 21 Wag Water River Plate 22 Sav-la-mar wetlands Plate 23 Yallahs Ponds (ducks flushed from Pond) Plate 24 Broad River Plate 25 Ann gives pilot pre-flight briefing Plate 26 Ducks flushed from Yallahs Plate 27 Final preparation for takeoff Plate 28 Recording data on standard datasheets Plate 29 On course for Mona Reservoir Plate 30 Low pass over Caymanas Pond
1.0 Objectives The surveys were designed to provide baseline information about: • Locations of major concentrations of migratory ducks; • Approximate numbers of migratory ducks and relative abundance of species; • Seasonal population changes of migratory ducks; and • Status, distribution and threats to duck habitats. These data form the basis for recommendations about sustainable management of Jamaican duck populations. (see Terms of Reference, Appendix 1)
2.0 Background Twenty-three species of ducks have been recorded in Jamaica, including three resident species that stay in Jamaica year-round and breed on the island (West Indian Whistling Duck [Dendrocygna arborea], Masked Duck [Nomonyx dominica], and Ruddy Duck [Oxyura jamaicensis]). The remainders are migrants. Blue-winged Teal [Anas discors], Northern Shoveler [Anas clypeata], American Wigeon [Anas americana] and Lesser Scaup [Aythya affinis] are relatively common, but other species are known from few records (Appendix 5, Raffaele et al. 1998), and are considered to be vagrant. Table 1: List of Ducks Observed in Jamaica1 (see Appendix 11) SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME OCCURRENCE Dendrocygna autumnalis BLACK-BELLIED WHISTLING DUCK Vagrant Dendrocygna bicolor FULVOUS WHISTLING DUCK Vagrant Dendrocygna arborea WEST INDIAN WHISTLING DUCK Resident Neochen jubata ORINOCO GOOSE2 Vagrant Branta canadensis CANADA GOOSE3 Vagrant Aix sponsa WOOD DUCK4 Vagrant Anas creca GREEN-WINGED TEAL Winter Anas platyrhnychos MALLARD Winter Anas bahamensis WHITE-CHEEKED PINTAIL Vagrant Anas acuta NORTHERN PINTAIL Vagrant Anas discors BLUE-WINGED TEAL Winter
1 Data compiled from field observations, literature and band recoveries 2 Dubious record 3 No recent confirmed records 4 Known from one band recovery only
Anas cyanoptera CINNAMON TEAL Winter Anas clypeata NORTHERN SHOVELER Winter Anas strepera GADWALL Vagrant Anas americana AMERICAN WIGEON Winter Aythya valisineria CANVASBACK Vagrant Aythya americana REDHEAD Vagrant Aythya collaris RING-NECKED DUCK Winter Aythya affinis LESSER SCAUP Winter Aythya marila GREATER SCAUP Vagrant Bucephala albeola BUFFLEHEAD Vagrant Oxyura jamaicensis RUDDY DUCK Resident Nomonyx dominica MASKED DUCK Resident 3.0 Methods 3.1 Literature search. Major wetland areas for surveys were identified from the literature, previous field observations, reports, discussions with local people, ornithologists and hunters, and examination of 1:50,000 metric maps of Jamaica.
3.2 Examination of museum specimens. The collection of specimens at the Institute of Jamaica's Natural History Division was examined and notes made of the specimens.
3.3 Analysis of band recoveries. Data provided by the Office of Migratory Bird Management, US Biological Service, on ducks banded in North America, and recovered in Jamaica, were analysed.
3.4 Aerial surveys were carried out in January, February, March and April 2001. The methodology for aerial surveys of ducks recommended by Ducks Unlimited (summarised by Hamilton & Sutton 2000) was followed as closely as possible.
Type of plane: A Cessna 182 fixed-wing plane was used. DU recommended that the Cessna 172 would be the most suitable type of plane, because it is light and easy to manoeuvre. However, Wings Jamaica Ltd. pilots was unwilling to use this model because of its lack of power and limited range.
Flight path: As far as possible, the flight path followed linear transects along pre-determined routes, which were discussed with the pilot
before starting the flight. The main objective was to cover as many ponds as possible, and to use this as a basis for designing optimal flight paths for future surveys. If necessary when ducks were observed the pilot was asked to circle and repeat observations were made to confirm observations. As far as possible, the total observation time was limited to 2 hours. Diversions were also made to cover new areas of ponds that were spotted from the air.
Height above ground: About 100 ft or lower once ponds were located.
Flight speed: As appropriate (less than 100 mph whenever possible).
Time of day: About 1 hour after dawn for 2-4 hours.
Observers: Principal observer- A Sutton: beside pilot Secondary observer - Brandon Hay: behind pilot (counting on opposite side of plane) Tertiary observer – behind principal observer to alert principal observer of need to circle back, if necessary. Various persons from NRCA and NGOs were invited to assist. Observers were encouraged to improve their counting skills by using the training programme "Count" supplied by DU.
Recording observations: Ideally each observer should have been provided with a voice-activated tape recorder with a directional microphone of variable sensitivity. However suitable microphones and tape recorders were not available. The one that was available could not be adjusted to eliminate cabin noise. Therefore observations were recorded on standard forms.
Frequency of surveys: DU recommended checking all sites on two consecutive days at least once per month. Due to budgetary restraints, the present survey was limited to one survey per month, January to March. DU funds were used to repeat the surveys in April. Aerial surveys were supplemented by terrestrial counts whenever the opportunity arose in the course of other activities. Dates of aerial surveys are shown in Table 1.
Routes: Each month all the wetlands and groups of ponds in the island were surveyed over a four day period (Map 1). As far as possible the same routes were repeated each month. Table 2: Dates and Routes of Aerial Surveys DATE ROUTE OBSERVERS5 START END FLYING TIME 9 Jan 01 Palisadoes, Caymanas, Port AS, BH, RS 742 1015 2hr Henderson, Goat Islands, Old 33min Harbour Bay to Jackson Bay, Hill Run 10 Jan 01 Salt Island Lagoon, Rocky Point, AS, BH, RS 742 1050 3hr 53 Rio Minho, Milk River to Scott's min Cove, Black River Morass, Osbourne Store, Colbeck 11 Jan 01 Whitehouse, Cabaritta, Negril AS, BH, RS 716 1042 3hr 35 Morass, N. Coast to Falmouth min 12 Jan 01 Kingston, Moneague, Port AS, BH, CT 717 1044 3hr 7 min Maria, east coast, Morant Pt. to Kingston 13 Feb 01 Palisadoes, Caymanas, Port AS, BH, RS 710 943 2hr 33 Henderson, Goat Islands, Old min Harbour Bay to Jackson Bay, Hill Run 14 Feb 01 Salt Island Lagoon, Rocky Point, AS, BH, TP 702 1041 3hr 39 Rio Minho, Milk River to Scott's min Cove, Black River Morass, Osbourne Store, Colbeck 15 Feb 01 Appleton, Whitehouse, AS, BH, RW 720 Cabaritta, Negril Morass, N. Coast to Falmouth (including Montpelier, Hampden) 16 Feb 01 Kingston, Moneague, Falmouth, AS, BH, HW III 712 1114 3 hr 20 Pt Maria, east coast, Morant Pt. min To Kin. 22 Mar 01 Palisadoes, Caymanas, Port AS, BH 703 2hr Henderson, Goat Islands, Old 32min Harbour Bay to Jackson Bay, Hill Run 23 Mar 01 Salt Island Lagoon, Rocky Point, AS, BH, AH 704 1026 3hr 22
5 Participants in the Surveys - AS: Ann Sutton, BH: Brandon Hay, CT: Canute Tyndale, RS; Robert Sutton, TP: Tarn Peralto, HW III Harvey Webb, PE: Peter Espeut, PV: Peter Vogel, RA: Richard Ashfield, JH: John Head, PWK: Peter Wilson-Kelly, RW: Raymond Williams, AH: Andre Hay
Rio Minho, Milk River to Scott's min Cove, Black River Morass 25 Mar 01 Appleton, Whitehouse, AS, BH, RS 735 1206 4hrs Cabaritta, Negril Morass, N. Coast to Falmouth 26 Mar 01 Kingston, Moneague, Long AS, BH, RA 714 1130 3hr 45 Pond, Hampden, Port Maria, min east coast, Morant Pt. to Kingston 18 Apr 01 Palisadoes, Caymanas, Port AS, BH, JH 654 857 2hr 3min Henderson, Goat Islands, Old Harbour Bay to Jackson Bay, Hayes 19 Apr 01 Salt Island Lagoon, Rocky Point, AS, BH, PV 708 3 hrs Rio Minho, Milk River to Scott's Cove, Black River Morass, Osbourne Store, Colbeck 20 Apr 01 Whitehouse, Cabaritta, Negril AS, BH, PWK 700 1115 4 hrs Morass, N. Coast to Falmouth, Queen of Spains Valley, Moneague 21 Apr 01 Kingston, Annotto Bay, east AS, BH, PE 723 943 2 hrs 2 coast, Morant Pt. to Kingston min 3.5 Terrestrial surveys - Ground truthing A few terrestrial surveys (total counts or estimates depending on the amount of time available at a given site) were made to verify counts from the air. These were not part of the formal survey, but were carried out on an ad hoc,hoc Duck Survey Routes
voluntary basis, when the observers visited duck habitats during the survey period. Five areas were covered - Great Pedro Pond (4 visits), Black River Upper Morass (3 visits), Hellshire Flashes and Sewage Ponds (2 visits), Mitchell Town Ponds (1 visit) and Hayes Sewage Ponds (1 visit) (for survey dates and times see Appendix 3).
4.0 Results 4.1 Species and relative abundance The largest number of ducks observed in a month was 3216, in February (Table 3). There were many potential sources of error. See Appendix 6 for a description of the main sources of error and the methods used to minimize them. The total number of ducks counted over the four-month period was 7271. However it is impossible to estimate the total winter population from a survey of this type, in the absence of marked individuals.
The most common species was Blue-winged Teal (Table 3), which accounted for more than 97% of all aerial observations. Similarly, Blue-winged Teal dominated band recoveries (Figure 1). Northern Shoveler, American Wigeon, West Indian Whistling Duck and Ruddy Duck Oxyura dominica were also detected in small numbers from the air (Table 3). No Masked Duck Nomonyx dominicensis were detected, although known habitats were surveyed.
Figure 1: Recoveries in Jamaica of Foreign Banded Ducks 19621962-- 19919944
70
60
50
40
30 Number
20
10
0 Wood Duck American Wigeon Blue-winged Teal Species
Table 3: Monthly Observations of Ducks in Aerial Surveys - January to April 2001 SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR TOTAL PERCENT OF TOTAL Blue-winged Teal 1732 3168 1961 236 7097 97.5 Northern Shoveler 5 17 33 0 55 0.8 Ruddy Duck 0 13 0 5 18 <0.1 American Wigeon 0 8 0 0 8 0.1 West Indian Whistling- 45 6 30 5 86 1.2 Duck Unidentified ducks 3 4 0 0 7 0.1 Total 1785 3216 2024 246 7271
The data generated from ground truthing (Appendix 3) did not closely resemble those from the aerial counts (e.g. at Great Pedro Pond, Figure 2). This may be because aerial surveys were carried out in the morning, when ducks may have been dispersed, while
1200
1000
800
ground 600 air Number 400
200
0 10-Feb-01 14-Feb-01 14-Mar-01 23-Mar-01 13-Apr-01 19-Apr-01 ground 1000 720 500 air 290 900 70 Date
Figure 2: Great Pedro Pond - Comparison of Ground and Air Counts ground truthing was done in the afternoon, when they were more concentrated. The ground truth counts included only the main Pedro Pond. The disparities in these data emphasise the need to study selected standard index sites in depth, in order better to understand patterns of habitat use, and thus to provide a scientific basis for interpreting data.
4.2 Seasonality and movements Numbers of Blue-winged Teal were highest in February and declined in March and April (Table 3; Figure 3).
Figure 3: Number of BlueBlue---wingedwinged Teal Observed by Month -
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500 Number (all sites) (all Number
0 JAN FEB MAR APR Month
Data from Aerial Surveys
The total count for January was lower than for February and March. The pattern for Northern Shoveler was different, possibly reflecting the increasing experience and skill of the observers (Figure 4).
35
30
25
20
15
10 Number (all sites) (all Number 5
0 JAN FEB MAR APR Month
Figure 4: Number of Northern Shoveler by Month - Data from Aerial Surveys
One reason for this may have been abnormal rainfall patterns. March was abnormally dry (Figure 5), and Salt Island Lagoon, which was one of the best sites for ducks in January and February, dried out completely in March and remained dry in April (Figure 7).
Figure 5: Rainfall at SW Portland Bight - Spring 2001and Long Term Averages
90 80 70 JAN 60 50 FEB 40 MA R
Rainfall 30 20 APR 10 0 LONGVILLE LONGVILLE BODLES BODLES SALT RIVER TARRENTUM 2001 lta 2001 lta 2001 lta 2001 and Long Term Averages (lta)
Banding recoveries showed a different pattern, with highest numbers in October (Figure 6).
Figure 6: Number of band recoveries by month
20 15 10 5
NUMBER 0
P UN JAN FEB MAR APR MAY J JUL AUG SE OCT NOV DEC MONTH
These data came from hunters and therefore are affected both by hunting patterns and the effects of hunting. The monthly totals for the thirteen wetland units with the highest total numbers of ducks are shown in Figure 7.
Origins of Blue Winged Teals Recovered in Jamaica
Figure 7: Seasonality of Observations of Ducks at Selected Sites
1200
1000
800
600 Number
400
200
0
N ER ST LEO PP OA LAHS L HAYES L A NEGRIL DUHANEY FLASHESELLSHIREG IV LOWER IV U ABARITTA N C YA H R C L BL R SALT ISLAND L PEDRO PONDSB Sites
JAN FEB MAR APR
The effects of drought were noted at many sites, including Galleon Harbour, Black River Lower Morass (specially Parottee Pond), Black River Upper Morass and the Cabaritta Swamp in Westmoreland. The only areas that did not experience a decline in March were Pedro and Yallahs Ponds both of which stayed wet throughout the period (Figure 7). The apparent increase in numbers at Pedro Pond, should be interpreted with caution because of the disparities between the data from the aerial surveys and counts (Figure 2).
4.3 Geographical Distribution Ducks were observed at 99 somewhat arbitrarily defined "sites" islandwide (Table 4). These "sites" varied from tiny isolated ponds less than ten metres across, to large wetland systems several
square kilometres in area (Appendices 2 and 5). Most observations were of groups of fewer than 10 ducks (Figure 8).
Figure 8: Sizes of Groups of Ducks - Spring 2001
200
100
0 1-10 11-50 51-100 101- 201- 301- 401-
NUMBER OF GROUPS OF NUMBER Series1 1557789311 N U M B E R IN G R O U P
The largest groups were less than about 500. For analysis, observations were grouped by wetland unit. Because observations on the North Coast were few and scattered, but the types of habitat were similar, the entire North Coast, from Orange Bay (Hanover) to Port Antonio (Portland) was arbitrarily treated as a single unit to simplify display of data.
4.4 Areas of special importance to ducks Migratory ducks: Migratory ducks were seen at many sites. Most areas were small and supported less than 10 ducks (see below). Areas which supported larger numbers of ducks in spring 2001 included St. Catherine (especially Salt Island Lagoon), coastal Clarendon (especially the Mitchell Town and Portland Cottage sections of West Harbour) and St. Elizabeth (especially the Pedro Ponds complex and Black River Upper Morass). Yallahs Pond in St. Thomas provided habitat for a few hundred ducks throughout the period.
Banding recoveries provide a similar picture, indicating the importance of Black River and Old Harbour, although many of the
other good sites have been destroyed or altered during the period
covered by Figure 9, in particular Great Salt Pond and the mangroves south and west of Kingston. Some other areas may have been affected by loss of open water (e.g. Luana, Milk River and Morant Point) where there is currently little suitable duck habitat.
Figure 9: Recoveries of Banded Ducks by Location
9
8
7
6
5
Number 4
3
2
1
0
y k h r il n a a l ta w a sa ee nd ld hs t e r nd w n u on in nd B it Ba iv g ag ve o M t o ar B es lla ua rb P o b y b a R Ne L la g Wa r Y k nkno k Ri nt lt Po o ve ca Parott akefie c Kings a a B Ca o a W Falmou Mil U na ntego Long Po Bla n . S Annott Or Pedro Po Old Ha Mor Clarkes To Mo rtland Cott ava Gt Disc o S P Location
Resident ducks: The number of resident ducks observed was very small, compared to the number of migrants. West Indian Whistling Ducks were seen at Black River Upper Morass, Jackson's Bay wetlands and fish ponds NW of Savannah-la-mar. No Masked Duck were detected although we surveyed several locations from which they have been reported in the past (Appendix 7). Ruddy Duck were seen at Windsor, Moneague ponds and St Ann's Bay.
4.5 Size of pond or wetland unit More than half of the ducks were seen in ponds or wetlands arbitrarily classified as "large" although large ponds comprised only 21% of the ponds that were used by ducks (Table 4). The areas of these ponds should now be measured and used to analyse these data.
Table 4: Pond Size and Duck Distribution SIZE # PONDS/ # DUCKS % DUCKS AVERAGE NUMBER OF WWETLANDSETLANDS DUCKS/HABITAT Large (> 0.5 km2) 21 4102 56 195
Medium(0.1-0.4 17 1184 16 70 km2) Small (<0.1 km2) 61 1985 27 30 99 7271
4.6 Vegetation Ducks were observed mainly in wetlands with herbaceous and mangrove vegetation. This is probably a reflection feeding preferences of Blue-winged Teal as well as of the availability of habitat types. Wetlands with herbaceous vegetation made up 47% of the total ponds used by ducks and had 69% of the ducks (Table 5).
Table 5: VegetationVegetation Use by Ducks - Spring 2001 VEGETATION TYPE # OF WETLANDS # DUCKS USING TYPE % DUCKS USING TYPE Coastal vegetation 1 420 6 Forest 1 3 <1 Herbaceous 47 4995 69 Mangrove 49 1834 25 Sea Grass 1 19 <1 99 7271 100
4.7 Habitat Use Ducks were seen in all types of shallow and deep ponds, including sewage ponds, fish farms, cattle ponds, and sinkholes. Most ducks were seen in ponds, rather than streams or canals (Table 6). Only one group of ducks was seen at sea.
Table 6: Water Body Use By Ducks - SpriSpringng 2001 POND TYPE # OF OBSERVATIONS Pond (including fish farms and oxbows) 93 River, stream or canal 5 Sea 1
4.8 Threats (Table 7) Habitat disturbance and illegal hunting appear to be the main threats. In the course of the surveys, we observed only one
person who might have been hunting illegally. We did not observe any wetlands being actively filled (except at Riverton Dump). We saw roads being constructed in or near wetlands near Hodges, St. Elizabeth and west of Savanna-la-Mar. We also noted that ganja cultivation was spreading rapidly through the Black River Lower Morass, and to a lesser extent the Upper Morass and Negril Morass, and observed the effects of fire (possibly associated with cultivation) in these areas.
Table 7: Condition of Selected Duck Habitats NAME OF LOCATION DESCRIPTION HABITAT CONDITION/THREATS7 DUCK QUALITY6 HABITAT Duhaney West of Several small Good Expansion of dump, pollution River/River Kingston mangrove ponds ton and river Salt Island Centre of Extensive Very Altered by drainage for fish Lagoon Hellshire herbaceous good ponds (now abandoned), may be marsh silting up. Dried out completely Hellshire West of Great Mangrove Good Habitat conditions appear stable. Flashes Salt Pond lagoons and and sewage farm with Sewage reed beds Ponds Galleon Cabaritta Point, Extensive Fair Habitat conditions appear stable. Harbour Amity Hall, Old mangroves with Harbour Bay many lagoons and Goat Islands Hayes and Vere Sewage ponds, Good New town construction and Rio Minho river and oxbow siltation could threaten ponds. ponds Pedro Treasure Several shallow, Very Threatened by tourism Ponds Beach and saline, brackish Good development and siltation. Great Bay and fresh ponds Dry out completely in some years. Black South St. Extensive Some Luana and Paroteee: River Elizabeth herbaceous good threatened by tourism and Lower (including marsh, coastal areas housing development. May Morass Luana/Font mangroves and dry out in some years.
6 Based on numbers of ducks seen in spring 2001 and other accounts. 7 Based on observations.
NAME OF LOCATION DESCRIPTION HABITAT CONDITION/THREATS7 DUCK QUALITY6 HABITAT Hill, lagoons Wallywash: stable, could be Wallywash threatened by water and Parotee abstraction Ponds) Lower Morass: Limited habitat, threatened by ganja cultivation Cabaritta North, east Coastal Good Threatened by clearance of and west of mangroves, mangroves, road Savanna-la- swamp forest, construction, ganja Mar (including fish farms, river cultivation, expansion of Frome) and ponds town, pollution. Negril Morass Herbaceous Fair Threatened by expansion of marsh, tourism and ganja cultivation. mangrove Amount of suitable habitat lagoons, very small relative to the size sewage ponds of the wetland. North Green Island Coastal Fair Threatened by expansion of Coast to Port mangrove tourism. Antonio fringe, with many small, ponds Yallahs East of Hypersaline Good Threatened by expansion of Ponds Yallahs coastal lagoon housing. Effects of brine shrimp production not assessed.
5.0 Discussion Caution is advised in interpreting the results presented above. Although the present survey represents an important advance in our knowledge, it remains an incomplete study of part of a wintering season. Several years data, covering at least October to March, will be needed to form the basis of wise management of duck populations (M. Carbonell, pers. comm.). DU is planning to help Jamaica to complete a set of surveys in winter 2001- 2.
5.1 Population sizes, seasonal movements and relative abundance of
species
The findings of aerial surveys, ground truthing and band recoveries confirmed that Blue-winged Teal are the most common and abundant duck species wintering in Jamaica, as on other Caribbean islands (e.g. the Cayman Islands, Bradley 2000).
The total population of Blue-winged Teal in Jamaica in spring 2001 was not less than 3,168, the maximum monthly total. This is a very small proportion of the population of around 6 million in the traditional survey area of North America (Wilkins et al. 2001) or the more than 1 million teal that were counted on a single wetland in Cuba in spring 2001 (L. Mujica Valdes pers. comm.). Nevertheless, Jamaica could be a significant habitat for the species, if the turnover rate is high during the migration period (M. Carbonnell, pers. comm.). Anecdotal accounts from hunters suggest that this may be the case. They report that large numbers of ducks arrive, sometimes on small remote ponds, and move on quickly. The hunters employ local people to monitor ponds and report the arrival of ducks. When ducks are reported the hunters go out as quickly as they can and shoot them. Whether the ducks would stay longer if they were not disturbed is not known, but seems likely based on experience in the Bahamas (P. Maillis, pers. comm.). Blue- winged Teal on migration are particularly skittish (Bent 1962).
Other migratory species were uncommon in comparison to teal. Northern Shoveler and American Wigeon were both observed in aerial surveys. Other species, such as Green-winged Teal, Cinnamon Teal and Ring-necked Duck are regularly seen in Jamaica (R. & A. Sutton, unpublished data, Appendix 3 and various sources Appendix 7) but would be hard to distinguish from the air without considerable practice.
In aerial surveys and ground truthing, West Indian Whistling Ducks were the most commonly observed of the resident ducks. A few Ruddy Ducks were observed from the air. This species is more likely to be seen in open water than the Masked Duck, but it seems likely that its population was underestimated. Despite the short-
comings of the survey methods, the low numbers of resident duck species should be a serious cause for concern, as their habitats (i.e. fresh-water and brackish permanent, seasonal, natural and man- made ponds and lakes, rivers, streams, ditches, reservoirs and fish ponds) are limited in extent, and are among the most threatened natural and semi-natural habitats in Jamaica (Haynes Sutton 1999).
5.2 Population trends Long term studies in North America indicate record high numbers of migratory ducks in 1999 - 2000. The overall estimate of Blue- winged Teal in he traditional survey area in spring 2001 was 5.8 +/- 0.03 million. This was 23% less than the all time high in 2000 of 7.4 million, but still 29% above the long-term average for 1955 - 2000 Conditions on the breeding grounds were good in spring 2001, and a good fall flight was anticipated ((Wilkins et al. 2001). Banding recoveries suggest that Blue-winged Teal in Jamaica originate from the main breeding grounds in central and eastern North America (Map 2).
The population trends in the breeding population may be related to the effect of adaptive management of hunting, effective habitat protection and favourable weather conditions during the breeding season, as well as declining interest in hunting. Whether increases in breeding populations are reflected in increases in wintering populations in Jamaica depends on whether local populations are limited by the availability of suitable, undisturbed habitat, or by the number of migrating ducks. While the occurrence of migrant ducks in the Cayman Islands appears to be influenced by breeding success in North America (Bradley 2000), there is little indication of a similar linkage in Jamaica (Haynes Sutton 1996). More data are needed to evaluate this relationship.
5.3 Seasonality and movements Generally Blue-winged Teal begin to migrate from North America with the first frosts in late August and early September, arriving in the Greater Antillean wetlands shortly after. Many fly on to the
Lesser Antilles and central and southern America, while some remain. They begin to return to the breeding grounds in mid April. However in some islands, such as Puerto Rico (F. Rivera in litt.) and Cuba (Ramsden, 1910) a few remain all year, and even in the Cayman Islands they have been recorded in all months (Bradley 2000). Thousands are reported in the Cayman Islands in October, November and March. Presumably, most are transients or passage migrants (Bradley 2000). such as those in Jamaica, may provide important staging areas for passage migrants (M. Carbonnell, pers. comm.).
The pattern of seasonal habitat use in Jamaica remains little understood, despite the present survey, partly because of the survey did not cover the entire season (i.e. September to April) and partly because of the confounding effects of the drought in spring 2001. In either case, at least 10 years of data would be needed to begin to address this issue. The largest numbers of ducks were recorded in February. Numbers declined in March and even more in April (Table 2 & Figure 3). The total count for January was lower than for February and March. This was contrary to our expectation, based on information from Cuba and Puerto Rico (Hamilton & Sutton 1999) that numbers would be highest in January. A study in Cuba found that teal populations increased gradually from October to February, and then increased more rapidly until May (Acosta Cruz & Godinez, 1984).
In the present study however, there were some additional sources of bias, that may have affected the findings. Observers and pilots were relatively inexperienced in January, and some sites were missed. Additional sites were added in February after being located from the air. A severe drought, that started in March meant that some of the best sites (such as Salt Island Lagoon) were deserted. Where viewing conditions were good, water levels were stable, and disturbance minimal, e.g. in Yallahs Pond and Pedro Pond, the duck populations were also apparently stable. This points to the importance of maintenance of water levels. Some other known
duck habitats, such as Caymanas Dyke Ponds, apparently supported no ducks during the period, despite apparently suitable water levels. More detailed work is needed to investigate the relationship between water levels, rainfall and duck distribution.
Ducks may move between habitats and islands during the season, in response to changes in food availability, and disturbance (e.g. hunting). Little is known of their patterns of movement during the winter. It is impossible to determine or estimate what proportion of the population remained at particular sites or moved among sites within Jamaica or adjacent islands. The relative stability of numbers at Yallahs Pond and Great Pedro Pond (based on ground truthing) suggests that some individuals may remain in the same site for the winter, but the stable figures could also be an artefact of the carrying capacity of the sites. More work, using marked individuals, would have to be done to determine turnover rates of ducks (see below).
5.4 Geographical Distribution and Habitat Use The aerial surveys and the inventory of habitats, suggested that ducks use wetland habitats wherever they occur (Map 1). Most of the larger concentrations of ducks are on the south coast, especially in the Portland Bight Protected Area and proposed Black River Protected Area (Massa & Sutton 1998). The survey clearly illustrated how few large areas of suitable habitat there are. Most habitats are small, scattered and vulnerable (Table 7). Some large wetlands, such as Black River Lower Morass, Canoe Valley St. Thomas Great Morass and the Negril Morass, include very little shallow, open water.
5.5 Threats Loss and occlusion of freshwater ponds through siltation, drought and overgrowth by vegetation: Open freshwater habitats are among the most threatened habitat types in Jamaica (Haynes Sutton 2000). This is a serious threat to the survival of freshwater species, especially ducks. Ponds such as Salt Island Lagoon, Black River Upper Morass and Pedro
Pond and may be more prone to drying because water from streams and springs is being diverted to use in aquaculture and agriculture. Meanwhile siltation from soil erosion is making the ponds shallower and more vulnerable. For example, Salt Island Lagoon has always been subject to drought cycles, but we hypothesise that deforestation of the surrounding hills, combined with changes in drainage, associated with the (now abandoned) fish farm that was operated in the area in the late 1970s and early 1980s, may have exacerbated the problem. Parottee Pond, which also supports ducks in good years, although none was seen there in spring 2001, also dried out in March 2001. Other outstanding duck habitats including Great Pedro Pond have also been known to dry out during the winter dry season as well as during the summer (A. & R. Sutton, unpublished data). The deforestation and development of the surrounding lands may have increased siltation, making the ponds shallower and more susceptible to drought, while abstraction of water from coastal aquifers may have reduced inflows from springs and rivers.
Several studies have shown that maintenance and manipulation of water levels is the simplest way to ensure suitable habitats for waterfowl and shorebirds. A study of some managed wetlands in North America found that wetland size and topographic variation correlated positively with concentrations of some species, but water depth was the best overall predictor (Colwell & Taft 2000). Optimum depths are <5 cm for small shorebirds, 5-11 cm for large shorebirds, 10-15 cm for teal and >20 cm for large dabbling ducks. Managing wetlands with variable bottom topography to have water levels of 15-20 cm would ensure habitat for many types of waterfowl (Isola et al. 2000). Specific measures may be necessary for certain species, for example measures to increase the availability of zooplankton and benthic invertebrates may be necessary to attract wintering shoveler (Guillemain et al.,al 2000). More research is needed into patterns of habitat use and specific habitat requirements of selected species. This should start with broad geographic data.
Road construction: Road construction parallel to the coasts, as well as new access roads to beaches, continue to be constructed at the expense of coastal wetlands.
Ganja cultivation: This practice is spreading rapidly throughout the Black River Lower Morass, and the Negril Morass. The cultivators create planting areas by digging ditches and piling the peat in a parallel mound, which is raised above the water level. While this practice does not affect duck habitats directly, it is reported that large amounts of pesticides and herbicides are used, which could pollute the morasses and affect food chains.
Tourist villa development: Two of the best sites for ducks in Jamaica - Great Pedro Pond and Parotee Pond are both being affected by tourist development, mainly construction of villas along their coastal peripheries. Apart from a culvert, built by the Natural Resources Conservation Department (NRCD) in the 1980s, Parottee Pond is cut off from the sea and the tidal flushing that used to sustain it. Meanwhile lots are still being sold in the wetland - that are actually under water for most of the year. At Great Pedro Pond, the road system of a large subdivision on the south side was badly designed, and following the indiscriminate bulldozing of the site, carries large quantities of silt into the pond.
Heavy Industry: Planned expansion of the solar salt factory at Portland Cottage, poses a possible threat to duck habitats in West Harbour, both through the direct effects of conversion of mangroves and ponds, and through the effects of seepage and pollution incidents on water quality. Other plans to develop heavy industry in Portland Bight threaten the integrity of the mangal.
Fish and shrimp culture: While the development of fish farms has reduced the amount of mangrove wetland, it has not resulted in a total loss of duck habitat. Our observations show that ducks regularly use ponds at active and abandoned fish farms. However birds using such habitats may be particularly at risk from illegal hunters. Another potential impact comes from changes in food chains, that might result from escaped or deliberately released cultured species such as the Australian Red-claw Cherax quardricarinatus. This species was released in the wetlands of Portland Bight and appears to be spreading. Its effects have never been
assessed.
Pollution - dunder and sewage: Pollution from dunder does not appear to be a deterrent to some species of ducks (e.g. Blue-winged Teal) which have been observed in heavily polluted waters in south Clarendon, and in habitats affected by pollution in the Black River Upper Morass. They also frequent the reed beds of the Hellshire sewage treatment plant (R. & A. Sutton, B. Hay, pers. obs.). Moderate levels of nutrient pollution may increase the food availability for some species of ducks in the short term but long term exposure or very high levels of nutrients are detrimental to the habitat and the ducks that feed there.
Pollution - use of lead shot: Sport hunting results in dumping of undetermined quantities of poisonous lead shot into the Jamaican environment each year. Waterfowl and other birds swallow and retain in their gizzards small stones to assist in breaking up their food. If lead shot is lying on the surface they may take it up, because it is the right size. It is estimated that many as three million waterfowl die in the US each year from lead poisoning (Sanderson & Bellrose, 1986). A recent study in Spain of stifftail ducks (Oxyura spp.) showed that ingested lead shot was present in 32% of hunted birds and 70% of dead or moribund individuals. That study recommended an immediate ban on use of lead for waterfowl hunting in Spain and cleanup of spent shot in major wetlands (Mateo et al. 2001). After the publication of this research lead shot was banned in protected wetlands in Spain (A. Green in litt.).
"Waterfowl die from ingesting lead shotgun pellets deposited on the bottoms of lakes and marshes and in fields. In most instances, they die after ingesting 1 or 2 pellets, their bodies wasting away over a period of several weeks, losing from 30 to 50 percent of normal weight. No other disease produces such a consistent chronic weight loss. Less frequently, a large number of shot are ingested, an acute form of lead poisoning results, and the bird dies in good weight. More definitive diagnoses of lead toxicosis have been made from levels of lead in wing bones, in blood, and in the liver and other organs.
Because of the widespread distribution of lead shot from the northern breeding grounds to the southern wintering grounds, it is available fall through spring
to waterfowl feeding on areas that have been hunted. As a result, mortality accrues on a day-to-day basis. These losses, however, are usually overlooked because predators quickly dispose of moribund birds. Studies in Missouri and Texas, for example, revealed that predators rapidly removed waterfowl carcasses placed by biologists in wetland habitats. Moreover, dead ducks in natural settings are difficult to find, and freshly planted carcasses in marsh vegetation were largely overlooked by searchers employed to find them. Only when massive die-offs of waterfowl occur in a limited area do losses from lead poisoning attract public attention. Such die-offs are the result of unusually high rates of shot ingestion; however, nutrition and low temperatures may be ancillary causes. Under these conditions, waterfowl die in numbers that exceed the ability of predators to consume them and to keep the environment tidy. Most die-offs from lead toxicosis occur after the hunting season - in winter and early spring.
The potential impact of lead poisoning on waterfowl populations has been ascertained from diverse sources of information. Almost 200,000 gizzards from more than 16 species of waterfowl in a number of geographical regions have been examined for lead shot during hunting seasons in fall and early winter. Scores of experiments with penned wild and gamefarm waterfowl have been conducted by numerous investigators to evaluate the effects of shot dose, nutrition, age, and sex and to study the physiological manifestations of lead toxicosis. A pertinent finding of nutrition studies was that protein, calcium, and phosphorus play an important role in determining the lethality of lead.
Species of waterfowl vary in their proclivity to ingest shot and, because of differing food habits, in their susceptibility to ingested lead. Lead toxicosis poses the greatest threat to mallards, followed in lessening degrees by black ducks, mottled ducks, pintails, canvasbacks, redheads, and ring-necked ducks. The potential for lead poisoning in other duck species is low. At times swans and geese become victims in numbers sufficiently large to cause concern." Sanderson & Bellrose, 1986.
There are no estimates of how many birds in Jamaica die from lead poisoning. Birds tend to die outside the hunting season, and their carcasses are rarely observed, being taken by crocodiles and other predators. Studies have shown that larger species (Sanderson & Bellrose, 1986) and stifftails (Mateo et al. 2000) are particularly vulnerable. This suggests that Jamaica's resident species may be at risk but no studies have been done of the effect of the lead on Jamaica's forest or wetland ecosystems. Lead is partially soluble in some mangrove swamps which tend to be acidic. Lead accumulates in food chains and may already be
causing damage to all levels of the ecosystem. A significant proportion of columbid hunting in Jamaica also occurs in or near coastal areas and wetlands (21% of birds were shot in coastal and wetland areas, NRCA 2000). The potential for long term damage to Jamaica's wetlands is evident.
The use of steel shot as a substitute for lead shot in waterfowl hunting is the only currently feasible solution to the problem of lead poisoning. Steel shot is less dense than lead shot but produces a tighter pattern and shorter shot string. The lower density of steel shot can be compensated for by increasing shot size and velocity, thus delivering similar levels of energy to the target. No significant differences in crippling rates were found in all but 3 of 15 tests comparing the effects of steel and lead shot. In only 1 of those 3 tests did steel shot cripple more ducks than the lead shot being tested….
Crippling losses to waterfowl populations from steel shot are less harmful than crippling losses plus lead toxicosis from lead shot. Several related points merit consideration. Lead poisoning causes important losses to the most abundant species of waterfowl. The sublethal effects of lead poisoning are recognized but have not been quantified. Except for a brief period in spring, lead may affect females more adversely than males. Finally, seasonal differences in the time of losses are important. A cripple lost during the hunting season has less impact on the breeding population than a lead-poisoned duck lost during the winter or spring." Sanderson & Bellrose, 1986.
Illegal Hunting: The extent and impacts of illegal hunting are not known. Only one possible case of illegal hunting was observed during the survey but hunters claim that significant numbers of people hunt illegally. However these reports remain unconfirmed by interceptions and convictions, probably because of low levels of reporting.
Ducks that are hunted tend to abandon the area, moving on to other areas. Therefore we hypothesised that areas that had a history of supporting large numbers of ducks, in which extensive, apparently good habitat persists, on which we saw fewer ducks than expected, could have been affected by illegal hunting. At least three areas in this category are known to be used by illegal hunters. They include Cabaritta Swamp in Westmoreland, Caymanas Dyke Ponds in St. Catherine and Boggy Pond, Clarendon, east of the Rio Minho. Illegal duck hunting can be reduced.
For example, the level of illegal hunting at Pedro Ponds seems to have declined since a local policeman was intercepted in 1996 (R. & A. Sutton, pers. obs.).
The need to control illegal hunting is cited by the hunters as a justification for opening a season for ducks, although the reasoning behind this argument is unclear, given the current low levels of interception and active enforcement by game wardens. It is difficult to assess the validity of the argument, in the absence of data about the extent and impacts of illegal hunting.
Proposed open hunting season: Although we recognise the high level of interest in duck hunting, and the many arguments in favour of hunting, the results so far, although incomplete, do not suggest that there are enough ducks wintering in Jamaica to support a hunting season. Proposals made in 1999-2000 called for weekend hunting from January to March, with a daily bag limit of 25 birds. The present survey indicates that there are very few sites at which one hunter might expect to shoot his bag, even on a single day. In 2000 the NRCA issued 1278 licences to hunters (NRCA 2001). The maximum number of ducks observed on any day was about 3,500. Although it is likely that this underestimates the total wintering population by an unknown factor (Appendix 6), it appears that the numbers of ducks wintering are insufficient to support hunting even if only a fraction of the traditional current hunters will participate in waterfowl hunting. We recognise that. In addition, the survey technique may have not adequately sampled the transient or passage migrant component of the population, which according to hunters, stops over briefly in large numbers in Jamaica in spring and autumn. Unfortunately, the hunters agree that the timing of any episodic influxes of ducks are irregular and unpredictable, in both timing and location. It would be difficult and risky to try to establish a hunting season to take advantage of these movements. If a season was to be opened, and the duck population was insufficient, hunters might naturally be tempted to take non-target species. The fact that most hunters are unfamiliar with Jamaican waterfowl and are accustomed to facing large numbers of potential targets in a columbid hunting season increases the likelihood
of non target, protected, species being shot.
Resident duck populations would be most at risk from accidental or deliberate take of protected species. The West Indian Whistling Duck is globally threatened and is found only in the Greater Antilles and northern Lesser Antilles. It is declining throughout its range. The status of Jamaica's West Indian Whistling Duck population is incompletely known but it has been estimated as about 500 (Sutton & Sutton 1997) and is subject to habitat loss, poaching and predation from introduced species. There are currently only a few places where there are recent reports of West Indian Whistling Ducks and these habitats are also favoured by migratory ducks, specially Blue-winged Teal. Currently none of these areas is part of effectively managed protected areas (except for a small area in the Negril Environmental Protection Area. West Indian Whistling Ducks This species could easily be extirpated from Jamaica in a single season of hunting (Sutton & Sutton 1997).
Masked and Ruddy Ducks are not globally threatened but are certainly very uncommon in Jamaica and would be at great risk of local extinction. Other species whose populations could be affected, although to a lesser extent, include Common Moorhen Gallinula chloropus, Glossy Ibis Plegadis falcinellus, Northern Jacanas Jacana spinosa, Clapper Rails Rallus longirostris and large shorebirds e.g. Yellowlegs Tringa spp., snipe Gallinago gallinago, Plovers Charidrius spp. and Willet Catoptrophorus semipalmatus.
Although hunting is not recommended under the current legislative and administrative framework, the possibility of allowing hunting in the future, under a different framework should not be rejected. In fact, under carefully regulated circumstances, duck hunting could contribute to wetland conservation. Effective management of protected areas including the majority of West Indian Whistling Duck habitat, as well as reservoir areas close to proposed hunting areas and hunting reserves managed specifically to enhance and sustain populations of migratory ducks, would be prerequisites. Due to the great potential for loss of biodiversity hunting of migratory ducks in Jamaica should only be done under
strictly controlled circumstances in areas managed as hunting reserves specifically for this purpose. Funds from this type of hunting should be used to rehabilitate other areas of natural habitat in Protected Areas and or other reserves that are managed as Watchable Wildlife ponds. Hunters that are interested in duck hunting should be encouraged to organise their resources to facilitate the establishment of waterfowl hunting reserves. The development of a partnership between National Environment and Planning Agency (NEPA), NGO's and hunters' groups to examine the feasibility of this proposal should be considered.
Introduced predators: The effects of introduced predators, specially mongoose, dogs and cats on migratory ducks have not been assessed. They are probably a greater threat to resident ducks, when on the nest, specially West Indian Whistling Ducks. In Antigua, West Indian Whistling Duck nesting success has increased dramatically, following eradication of rats from islands. Once nesting areas have been identified, control and eradication programmes for mongoose, rats and other species should be implemented.
5.6 Assessment of methods Surveying Migrant species: Aerial surveys provided an effective way to carry out extensive surveys of migrant species in difficult terrain. Migrant species tend to frequent open water during the day, fly in response to disturbance, and have obvious field marks and are therefore easy to detect from the air. Nonetheless, aerial surveys are unlikely to provide information about the occurrence and distribution of uncommon and rare species and it is possible that some of the birds identified as Blue-winged Teal were female or immature Green-winged or Cinnamon Teal, which would be difficult to distinguish from the air. Previous observations from Great Pedro Pond, St. Elizabeth, suggest that the proportion of these species is less than one percent (A. & R. Sutton, unpublished data). Although some species were probably overlooked because of difficulties of distinguishing ducks in winter plumage from the air, the relative occurrences of ducks observed from the air and ground observations were similar.
Surveying Resident species: The survey confirmed previous findings (Sutton & Sutton 1997) that West Indian Whistling Ducks, cannot be effectively surveyed from the air. Observations bore little relationship to knowledge of distribution and population. Similarly, Masked Duck cannot be surveyed from the air. It inhabits small ponds, spending the day partially submerged in dense vegetation, and submerging, rather than flying, when disturbed. Other methods need to be developed for the urgently needed status assessment of resident duck species.
Timing and frequency of surveys: Ducks Unlimited recommended twice monthly surveys from October to April (Hamilton & Sutton 1999). This was too costly and the decision was taken to survey once per month. However, it was not possible to begin the survey until January. At least one more season of surveys, covering the entire period is needed. Based on the findings, it should be possible to cut down on the number of surveys. Ducks Unlimited has offered to provide funds to pay for transportation for winter 2001-2002.
Problems with aerial surveys: Problems with implementing the aerial surveys included lack of headsets on the plane, which made if difficult to communicate with each other and the pilot; reluctance of some pilots to start early enough in the morning or fly low and slow over the selected areas, and problems with recording data (because we did not have tape recorders that could function on the plane, we had to write observations, and may have missed some sightings). We would also have liked to have a GPS unit on which to automatically record locations of sightings.
Ground truthing: Data from ground truthing did not correspond closely to data collected from aerial surveys. This is because: While aerial surveys provide better overall coverage, they rely on quick estimates and therefore some birds may be overlooked, especially if they are in thick vegetation. Ground truthing was usually done later in the day than aerial surveys. More ground surveys are necessary to assess the feasibility of this method.
6.0 Recommendations 6.1 Conservation of species None of the species of migratory ducks that occur in Jamaica is globally threatened. However, due to low populations and widely scattered distribution in small and vulnerable habitats, they should be considered to be locally threatened. Resident ducks are even more vulnerable to diminishing local habitats, because are they must breed here and sufficient good quality habitat is essential for breeding success. The West Indian Whistling Duck is already considered to be threatened at the global level. Masked Ducks and Ruddy Ducks should be considered as locally vulnerable.
We recommend that: Recovery action plans should be prepared and implemented for these species.
6.2 Conservation of habitats Experience in other countries (e.g. the Bahamas P. Maillis, pers. comm. and Puerto Rico (Vilella & Gray 1997) has demonstrated that effectively managed protected areas increase populations of ducks, even when there is legal hunting. Most of the best duck habitats in Jamaica are within declared or proposed protected areas, several fall within the Portland Bight Protected Area such as Salt Island lagoon, West Harbour, Amity Hall, Boggy Pond and Mitchell Town ponds. However some important areas are not currently within the proposed system, e.g. Yallahs Ponds and many small ponds (probably including the majority of habitats for Masked and Ruddy Ducks. Experimental work in the wetlands of Humacao in Puerto Rico has demonstrated that wetland habitats can be restored and duck populations increased (Vilella & Gray 1997).
We recommend that: The inventory of actual and potential duck habitats should be completed.