DOCSLIB.ORG

Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment for the Nyanza Chemical Waste Dump Superfund Site

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment for the Nyanza Chemical Waste Dump Superfund Site Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment for the Nyanza Chemical Waste Dump Superfund Site Prepared for Nyanza NRD Trustee Council: Commonwealth of Massachusetts U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Prepared by: Stratus Consulting Inc. PO Box 4059 Boulder, CO 80306-4059 Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment for the Nyanza Chemical Waste Dump Superfund Site Prepared for Nyanza NRD Trustee Council: Commonwealth of Massachusetts U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Prepared by: Stratus Consulting Inc. PO Box 4059 Boulder, CO 80306-4059 303-381-8000 Contact: Diana Lane, PhD Contact for Public Comments: Karen Pelto Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup One Winter Street, 6th Floor Boston, MA 02108 [email protected]. May 7, 2012 SC11973 List of Authorities Natural Resource Trustees: U.S. Department of the Interior: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Commerce: U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Commonwealth of Massachusetts: Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, Trustee Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Trustee Delegate Legal Authority: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (as amended), 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et. seq. Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act) (as amended), 33 U.S.C. § 1251, et. seq. Natural Resource Damage Assessment Regulation, 43 C.F.R. Part 11 Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33 U.S. Code 2701-2761 et seq.) Massachusetts Oil and Hazardous Material Release Prevention and Response Act (Massachusetts General Laws (M.G.L.) Chapter 21E) Lead Federal Agency for Restoration Plan: U.S. Department of the Interior (Region 5, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) Lead Federal Agency for Environmental Assessment: U.S. Department of the Interior (Region 5, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) SC11973 Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. viii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ ix List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................................................... xi Section 1 Introduction to the Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment ........... 1 1.1 Trustee Responsibilities and Authorities ................................................................ 2 1.2 Summary of Nyanza NRD Settlement .................................................................... 3 1.3 Summary of Natural Resource Injuries................................................................... 4 1.4 Need for Restoration ............................................................................................... 7 1.5 Restoration Goals .................................................................................................... 7 1.6 Coordination and Scoping ...................................................................................... 8 1.6.1 Trustee Council Organization and Activities.............................................. 8 1.6.2 Summary of Public Involvement ................................................................ 9 1.6.3 Public Notification .................................................................................... 11 1.6.4 Restoration Planning Record .................................................................... 11 Section 2 Affected Environment ........................................................................................ 12 2.1 SuAsCo Environment ........................................................................................... 13 2.1.1 Federal Recognition of Ecological Importance ........................................ 14 2.2 Socioeconomic Environment ................................................................................ 18 Section 3 Restoration Evaluation Criteria ........................................................................ 19 3.1 Factors Identified for Consideration under the DOI Regulations ......................... 20 3.2 Eligibility Criteria Developed by the Trustee Council ......................................... 21 3.3 Evaluation Criteria ................................................................................................ 22 Section 4 Restoration Alternatives ..................................................................................... 25 4.1 No-Action/Natural Recovery Alternative ............................................................. 26 4.2 Summary of Proposed Alternative ........................................................................ 26 4.3 Proposed Alternative – Aquatic Biological Resources and their Supporting Habitats and Food Sources ................................................................................... 31 4.3.1 Removal of Tire Dump in Forested Wetlands .......................................... 31 4.3.2 Control of Aquatic Weeds in the Sudbury River Watershed .................... 34 4.3.3 Habitat Restoration to Benefit Coldwater Fish ......................................... 45 SC11973 Stratus Consulting Contents (5/7/2012) 4.3.4 Concord River Diadromous Fish Restoration: Feasibility and Stewardship ........................................................................................ 53 4.3.5 Sudbury RiverSchools Program ................................................................ 62 4.4 Proposed Alternative – Riparian and Floodplain Biological Resources and their Supporting Habitats and Food Sources .................................................. 64 4.4.1 Greenways North Field Restoration ......................................................... 66 4.4.2 Neotropical Connections (Belize) ............................................................. 71 4.4.3 Sudbury River Corridor Land Acquisitions .............................................. 76 4.4.4 Creation of Stearns and Brackett Reservoirs Wildlife Preserve ............... 80 4.5 Proposed Alternative – Recreation and Public Access ......................................... 89 4.5.1 Sudbury River Public Access: Aikens Road ............................................. 89 4.5.2 Sudbury River Access Improvements: Great Meadows NWR Headquarters ................................................................................... 93 4.5.3 Red Maple Trail: Boardwalk and Wildlife Observation Platform Construction ............................................................................... 95 4.6 Alternatives Considered but Not Recommended for Funding ............................ 101 Section 5 Environmental and Socioeconomic Impacts of Restoration Alternatives ................................................................................... 106 5.1 Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Alternative .......................................... 107 5.1.1 Water Resources ..................................................................................... 107 5.1.2 Vegetation Resources ............................................................................. 108 5.1.3 Fish and Wildlife Resources ................................................................... 108 5.1.4 Special Status Species ............................................................................. 109 5.1.5 Air and Noise .......................................................................................... 110 5.1.6 Geology and Minerals ............................................................................. 110 5.1.7 Soils ........................................................................................................ 110 5.2 Cultural and Socioeconomic Impacts of the Proposed Alternative .................... 110 5.2.1 Lands and Access .................................................................................... 110 5.2.2 Air, Noise, and Visual Resources ........................................................... 111 5.2.3 Cultural and Historical Resources and Native American Religious Concerns ................................................................................. 111 5.2.4 Socioeconomic Impacts .......................................................................... 111 5.2.5 Environmental Justice ............................................................................. 112 5.3 Impacts of the No-Action Alternative ................................................................ 112 5.4 Cumulative Impacts of the Proposed Alternative and the No-Action Alternative .......................................................................................................... 113 Page v SC11973 Stratus Consulting Contents (5/7/2012) Section 6 Compliance with Other Authorities ................................................................ 114 6.1 Laws .................................................................................................................... 114 6.1.1 Federal Laws ........................................................................................... 114 6.1.2 State Laws ............................................................................................... 119 6.1.3 Local Laws .............................................................................................. 122 6.2 Policies and Directives .......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sudbury Master Plan
    SUDBURY MASTER PLAN BASELINE REPORT VOLUME I Adopted by the Sudbury Planning Board [date placeholder] Sudbury Master Plan BASELINE REPORT Volume 1 February 19, 2021 Prepared for the Sudbury Master Plan Steering Committee Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Community Profile ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Transportation ............................................................................................................................................ 17 Housing ....................................................................................................................................................... 34 Economic Development .............................................................................................................................. 47 Historic and Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................. 70 Town Services ............................................................................................................................................. 87 Open Space and Recreation ...................................................................................................................... 106 Natural Resources ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Wild and Scenic River Conservation Plan
    The Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Wild and Scenic River Conservation Plan 2019 Update The Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Wild and Scenic River Conservation Plan May 2019 Update Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Wild and Scenic River Stewardship Council c/o National Park Service 15 State St Boston, MA 02109 617-223-5049 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ 2 Map of the Watershed ................................................................................................... 3 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 4 History of the Wild and Scenic River Designation Management Principles of Partnership Wild and Scenic Rivers Achievements Resulting from Designation Changes in the Region Since 1996 Role of the River Stewardship Council Purpose and Process of the Update How to Use this Update II. The River Management Philosophy ........................................................................ 11 Goals of the Plan A watershed-wide Approach III. Updates to the Administrative Framework ............................................................. 13 IV. Threats to the Outstandingly Remarkable Resource Values .................................... 14 V. Resource Management .......................................................................................... 15 Overview Public and Private Lands Water Resources – Water Quality Water Resources – Water Quantity
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Report Table of Contents
    2018 Annual Report Table of Contents Section Page(s) Annual Note from the Executive Director 1 Executive Summary 2‐3 Mission Statement 4‐7 Needs Assessment 8‐11 Measurable Outcomes 12‐15 Board of Directors and Community Supporters 16‐19 Annual Note from the Executive Director For me, 2017 was a year of introductions, observations, and understanding the goals and issues facing both businesses and residents. On the other hand, 2018 was punctuated by placemaking projects, events, and improved business engagement. One thing is certain: Downtown Framingham, Inc.’s (DFI) growing capacity has made its mark on the MetroWest area. With sustainable staffing, DFI can continue to meet the merits of the 4‐point Main Street America model. And through effective outreach, DFI can continue to quickly assess and respond to myriad internal and external forces shaping our cultural, urban area. This year, DFI placed a renewed focus on aggregating, assessing, and reporting feedback on everything from proposed government policies to neighborhood shopping habits. Local decision makers, including Framingham’s City Council, Traffic Commission, and Marijuana Task Force, critically weighed fresh insights from residents and shopkeepers to better understand our fast‐changing urban environment, which in turn informed their own voting behaviors. DFI’s relationship‐building strategies are the foundation of our tagline—“building business, community, and culture.” The confluence of community and business engagement, witnessed through tactics such as cultural events, business technical assistance, digital marketing, and placemaking projects, collectively stitched a better‐connected area primed to effectively collaborate—even when most stakeholders are physically bound to individual commercial spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Walden Planning Unit Resource Management Plan
    Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Bureau of Planning and Resource Protection Resource Management Planning Program RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Walden Planning Unit Including Walden Pond State Reservation May 2013 In coordination with: Crosby | Schlessinger | Smallridge, LLC Walden Planning Unit Including Walden Pond State Reservation RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2013 Deval L. Patrick, Governor Timothy P. Murray, Lt. Governor Richard K. Sullivan, Jr., Secretary Edward M. Lambert, Jr., Commissioner John P. Murray, Deputy Commissioner for Park Operations Resource Management Plans (RMPs) provide guidelines for management of properties under the stewardship of the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR). They are intended to be working documents for setting priorities, enabling the Department to adapt to changing fiscal, social, and environmental conditions. The planning process provides a forum for communication and cooperation with park visitors and the surrounding communities to ensure transparency in the DCR’s stewardship efforts. One of the most recognizable properties in the DCR park system, Walden Pond State Reservation is an iconic national and international destination. The pond that inspired Henry David Thoreau’s seminal work Walden, or Life in the Woods holds divergent meanings. To many, the reservation is a sacred landscape and international cultural heritage site. To some, it is a profound symbol of both Thoreau’s writings and the genesis of the land conservation movement. Simultaneously, the reservation is valued for its recreation opportunities, whether swimming in Walden Pond’s waters on hot summer days, canoeing on the pond’s calm waters, or cross-country skiing in its surrounding forests. This plan outlines recommendations that will improve the visitor experience for all, while preserving Walden Pond and its surrounding natural and cultural resources for the benefit of future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Framingham Historic Preservation Plan
    Town of Framingham Historic Preservation Plan Adopted: July 24, 2002 Framingham Historical Commission Laurie Evans-Daly, Chair Elizabeth Funk, Vice Chair Mary Murphy, Secretary Gerald Couto Waldo Lyon David Marks Robert Snider Stephen Herring, Town Historian Donna Jacobs, Framingham Department of Planning & Economic Development Table of Contents Page 1. Preamble 1.1 Historic Preservation Goals ........................................................................................5 1.2 History of Growth and Development in Framingham .............................................6 1.3 Profile of Framingham ................................................................................................8 2. Framingham's Preservation Planning Efforts 2.1 Municipal ....................................................................................................................14 2.2 Private Preservation Organizations .........................................................................20 2.3 Private Citizens Efforts .............................................................................................24 2.4 State .............................................................................................................................25 2.5 Federal ........................................................................................................................29 2.6 Action Recommendations ............................................................................. 29 3. The Cultural Resources Inventory 3.1 The Inventory
    [Show full text]
  • To Download the PDF File
    FALL NEWSLETTER THE WREN November 2013 Sudbury Valley Trustees Welcomes Lisa Vernegaard as Executive Director By Colin Anderson, Board President After an extensive search, the SVT Board of Directors was delighted to announce that Lisa Vernegaard would be taking over the leadership of SVT, and by the time this newsletter reaches our supporters, she will have completed her first weeks as SVT’s seventh Executive (continued on page 2) Director. We were gratified at the number and caliber of candidates who expressed interest in this posi- tion. Candidates applied from across the eastern half of the United States, offering a variety of backgrounds and some amazing qualifications. In the end, we determined that the best candidate for the job had been working extensively in our watershed for many years and was already known to a number of the staff and board at SVT. She also happens to live right next door in Maynard. Although born and raised in Utah, Lisa has lived and worked in New England for most of her adult life. Since earning her master’s degree in Forest Science at Yale, she has spent the last 20 years of her career at The Trustees of Reservations. Lisa’s knowledge of our watershed and SVT’s 7th Executive Director, (continued on page 2) Lisa Vernegaard PARTNERING WITH HOPKINTON Fruit Street Property and Elmwood Farm Preserved by Conservation Restriction By Christa Collins, Director of Land Protection, and Susan Crane, Land Protection Specialist June was a great month for Hopkinton with the permanent protection of over 225 acres of open space by conservation restrictions (CRs) now held or co-held by Sudbury Valley Trustees.
    [Show full text]
  • Propagation and Distribution of Food Fishes
    U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE R. P. LAMONT, Secretary BUREAU OF FISHERIES HENRY O'MALLEY, Commieeioner Bureau of Fisheries Document No. 1098 PROPAGATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF FOOD FISHES FISCAL YEAR 1930 By GLEN C. LEACH APPENDIX XVI TO REPORT OF COMMISSIONER OF FISHERIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1930 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON i 1931 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. - - - - - - - - - Price 15 cents PROPAGATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF FOOD FISHES, FISCAL 1 YEAR 1930 By GLEN C. LEACH, Chief, Division of Fish Culture CONTENTS Page Introduction - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1125 Part 1.—Fish Production: Propagation and Rescue Work Species handled _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1126 Output 1127 Cooperation with other conservation agencies - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1128 Cooperative fish nurseries - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1129 State fish-cultural activities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1132 Salvage of food fishes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1135 Transfers of eggs between stations - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1136 Shipments to foreign countries - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1137 Output of stations and substations - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1137 Egg collections - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest FRAMINGHAM's RURAL LANDSCAPE BENEFITS
    WINTER NEWSLETTER THE WREN February 2012 Northwest Meet Our New AmeriCorps MassLIFT Framingham’s Rural Members Landscape Benefits SVT would like to introduce the two new AmeriCorps MassLIFT (Massachusetts Land Initiative for from Harrington Tomorrow) members that joined the SVT team last September for an Conservation 11-month service term. Ashley Davies is serving as a Regional Conservationist Restriction for the Land Protection program, and Audra Valaitis is serving as a Land By Christa Collins, Director of Land Protection Steward for the Stewardship program. Ashley is from Dartmouth, George and DD Harrington of Framingham are familiar faces Massachusetts and is now a permanent around SVT, in part because George is a past board member and resident of Northborough. Ashley president, and now serves as a regular office volunteer; in part studied Law, Policy, and Society at Ashley Davies and Audra because the number of conservation donations they have made are Northeastern University and has a J.D. Valaitis: SVT appreciates almost too numerous to count on one hand. from Roger Williams University School the experience, knowledge, Between 1983 and 2000, the Harringtons donated three parcels of Law. Ashley has worked at and vol- and conviviality that they unteered with several environmental and bring to our Wolbach of land along scenic Edmands Road in Framingham, now known Farm office. as Harrington Fields. In 2007, the Harringtons made a gift of a land conservation organizations, includ- conservation restriction on their 80-acre Baiting Brook Meadow ing the Aquidneck Land Trust, MA Department of Environmental Farm on Nixon Road, where they grow and sell Christmas trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Walden Pond and Woods Special Resource Study
    National Park Service United States Department of the Interior Boston Support Office Northeast Region Walden Pond and Woods Special Resource Study September 2002 I-.a. ■i-.’fTxr-'«i«?* J?:- *•.$.. ■*!•' ¿¡F*«" - ; -,<■ ï r-' . ' vr~>s -• - - .-• •• I è--- “ .-‘v ÿ . ■> =: ; . ,• V:- '■ : ■ # . ;*v' - - ■4% -r'Î;:',W «Sfc& / 4 i f : * This report has been prepared to provide Congress and the public with information about the resources in the study area and how they relate to criteria for inclusion within the national park system applied by the professional staff of the National Park Service Publication and transmittal of this report should not be considered an endorsement or a commitment by the National Park Service to seek or support either specific legislative authorization for the project or appropriation for its implementation Authorization and funding for any new commitments by the National Park Service will have to be considered in light of competing priorities for existing units of the national park system and other programs. For additional copies or more information contact National Park Service Boston Support Office Planning and Legislation 15 State Street Boston, Massachusetts 02109 (617) 223-5051 Cover photograph © Scot Miller/suntomoon cow All rights reserved Interior photographs by Herbert W Gleason courtesy of the Thoreau Society, Lincoln, Massachusetts and the Thoreau Institute at Walden Woods Walden Pond and Woods Special Resource Study: Reconnaissance Survey Massachusetts September 2002 Produced by the Boston Support Office
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Effects of Winter Drawdowns on the Ecological Character of Littoral Zones in Massachusetts Lakes
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses March 2020 INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES Jason R. Carmignani University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Carmignani, Jason R., "INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES" (2020). Doctoral Dissertations. 1816. https://doi.org/10.7275/j5k1-fz29 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/1816 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES A Dissertation Presented by JASON R. CARMIGNANI Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 2020 Organismic and Evolutionary Biology © Copyright by Jason R. Carmignani 2020 All Rights Reserved INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES A Dissertation Presented by JASON R. CARMIGNANI Approved as to style and content by: ___________________________________ Allison H. Roy, Chair ___________________________________ Andy J. Danylchuk, Member ___________________________________ Cristina Cox Fernandes, Member ___________________________________ Peter D. Hazelton, Member ___________________________________ Jason T. Stolarksi, Member ___________________________________ Paige S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sudbury River Boater's Trail
    The Sudbury River Boater’s Trail Ñ S U DB U RY ASSABET &CONCORD WILD & SCENIC R IVE R STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL COMMENTARY GUIDE BY MATTHEW EISENSON THE SUDBURY RIVER BOATer’S TRAIL From Little Farms Road (Framingham) to Old Calf Pasture/ Egg Rock (Concord) runs approximately 15 miles. It consists of three major segments, each of approximately 5 miles: 1. Little Farms Road to Route 27 2. Route 27 to the Lincoln Boat Launch on Route 117 3. Lincoln Boat Launch Route 117 to Old Calf Pasture/Egg Rock Visit www.sudbury-assabet-concord.org for more information or to request a Boater’s Trail Guide. 1. Little Farms Road to Route 27 This section of the Boater’s Trail begins in the shaded, meandering reaches of the Sudbury River and runs about 5 miles to the beginnings of the wide open flood plains in Sudbury and Wayland. Take modest precaution because the water can be quick moving in the upper portion of this section in the spring. Along the way there are many natural and historical sites of interest, including the Oxbow, a natural river feature near the put-in, and remnants of the Old Stone Bridge. The River passes to the east of Heard Pond in Wayland and enters Great Meadows National Wildlife Refuge. Towards the conclusion of this section, the flood plains open in to wide meadows where there is opportunity to view numerous water birds. 2. Route 27 to Route 117, Lincoln Boat Launch on Route 117 The meadows reach their widest just downstream of Route 27.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Chestnut Management Guidance & Five-Year
    WATER CHESTNUT MANAGEMENT GUIDANCE & FIVE-YEAR MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE SUDBURY, ASSABET, AND CONCORD RIVER WATERSHED FEBRUARY 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Guidance document was produced by OARS through a project entitled “Planning and Guidance for Water Chestnut Management in the SuAsCo Watershed.” We would like to thank the members of the project’s Technical Advisory Committee who contributed their time and ideas to this document: Amber Carr (SuAsCo Cooperative Invasive Species Management Area), Jeff Castellani (Aquatic Control Technology/SOLitude, Inc.), Ron Chick (River Stewards Committee, Friends of Saxonville), Tom Flannery (Lakes and Ponds Program, Mass. Department of Conservation and Recreation), Michele Girard (Mass. Association of Conservation Commissions), Delia Kaye (Concord Natural Resources), Tom Largy (Wayland Surface Water Quality Committee), Lealdon Langley (Wetlands Program, Mass. Department of Environmental Protection), Frank Lyons (Hop Brook Protection Association), Eileen McGourty (Eastern Mass. National Wildlife Refuge Complex, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service), Dave McKinnon (Lincoln Conservation Dept.), Judy Schmitz (Wetlands Circuit Rider, Central Region, Mass. Department of Environmental Protection), and Michael Stroman (Wetlands Program, Mass. Department of Environmental Protection). Special thanks also to Bettina Abe (Acton Natural Resources Department), Eugene Benson (Mass. Association of Conservation Commissions), and Kathy Sferra (Stow Conservation Commission). The project was supported through the Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration Programs of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, using funding via the Nyanza Trustee Council, to restore natural resources that were injured by the release of mercury and other contaminants from or at the Nyanza Chemical Waste Dump Site in Ashland, Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]