Thames Catchment Flood Management Plan Summary Report December 2009 Managing Flood Risk Introduction
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
GLOUCESTERSHIRE. NOBT.B CIB.NEY, 61 Bennett Joseph, Farmer, Downhouse, R Holloway Pierce Hancock, Farmer, Smith Jn
• onu:o·roBY.] GLOUCESTERSHIRE. NOBT.B CIB.NEY, 61 Bennett Joseph, farmer, Downhouse, r Holloway Pierce Hancock, farmer, Smith Jn. draper & grocr. Low. Cam Upper Cam Lower Cam Thomas Sidney ( exors. of), coal mer Blick Robert, fruit merchant Hunt & Wintet'12otham Limited, wool· chants, Lower Cam Cam Conservative Association (Hrbt. !en cloth manufacturers, Cam mills Trotman Warren S. W. baker & corn, B. Thomas, sec) Ireland Joseph, Railway inn flour & offal merchant Cam Institute (Francis Mullins, sec.), Jenner Martin, farmer, Quarry Viney Albert E. assistant overseer, Lower Cam Lacey Felix & William, agric. imple- Helena house Champion Elizabeth (Miss), shop- ment agents, Upthrnp iron works Viney Thomas, coal & salt merchant, keeper, Upper Cam Lacey John, photographer, Low. Cam Helena house, Coaley junction ; &. Cornock John, Prince of Wales P.H. Lea Elizabeth (Mrs.), farmer, Dray- at Dursley railway station Berkeley road (letters via Berkeley) cott farm Webber Elizabeth (Mrs.), shopkeeper Daniels T. H. & J. Limited, leather Liberal Association (branch) (Gordon Weeks Harry Wakeham, boot maker, board manufacturers Malpruss, sec) Lower Cam Edwards Nellie (Miss), poultry Mabbett Daniel & Son, mill peck Weight Thos. farmer, Upthrup farm farmer, Water end manufacturers & dressers,Low.Cam Welcome Coffee Tavern & Reading Ford Absalom, blacksmith, Low. Cam l\falpass Charles, mason, Quarry Room (Mrs. C. E. Stone, mangrss) Gabb George & Thomas, butchers, Malpass Pierce, farmer, Beyon house, White Hartley, miller (water), Hal Lower Cam Lower Cam more mills Gabb Francis, painter, Sand pits Manning Fanny (:\Iiss), shopkeeper Whitmore Waiter, grocr. Low. Cam Garn Fredk. Wm. farmer,Upper Cam Pain FrPAl.erick John, farmer, Wood- Wiggall Douglas Frederick, baker, & Gazard Lawford, farmer, Lower Cam end green post office, Lower Cam Gazard Thomas, farmer, Knapp farm, Pain William, farmer, Clingre farm Willdns Edwin,farmer,WalnutTree fm Lower Cam Parslow Stepben, market gardener, Williams James, fa.rmer, Woodlield Griffiths Chas. -
Gi200900.Pdf
Gloucestershire Society for Industrial Archaeology Journal for 2009 Contents Editorial......................................................................................................................................2 From Willow to Wicket: A Lost Cricket Bat Willow Plantation in Leonard Stanley. By Stephen Mills ......................................................................... 3-8 Matthews & Company – Gloucester’s Premier Furniture Manufacturers By Hugh Conway-Jones ......................................................................................... 9-13 Two Recently Discovered Field Books from Sopwith’s Mineral Survey of the Forest of Dean. By Ian Standing ......................................................................... 14-22 The Canal Round House at Inglesham Lock By John Copping (Adapted for the GSIA Journal by Alan Strickland) ..................................................................... 23-35 Upper Redbrook Iron Works 1798-9: David Tanner's Bankruptcy By Pat Morris ...... 36-40 The Malthouse, Tanhouse Farm, Church End, Frampton on Severn, Gloucestershire By Amber Patrick ................................................................................................. 41-46 The Restoration of the Cotswold Canals, July 2010 Update. By Theo Stening .............. 47-50 GSIA Visit Reports for 2009 ............................................................................................. 51-57 Book Reviews ................................................................................................................... -
15 Road Drainage and the Water Environment
HIGHWAYS AGENCY – M4 JUNCTIONS 3 TO 12 SMART MOTORWAY 15 ROAD DRAINAGE AND THE WATER ENVIRONMENT 15.1 Introduction 15.1.1 This chapter assesses the impacts of the Scheme on road drainage and the water environment during construction and operation, focussing on the effects of highway drainage on the quality and hydrology of receiving waters. In view of the long design-life of the Scheme (30 years for new gantries, 40 years for new carriageway construction, and 120 years for new bridges), the decommissioning phase of the Scheme has not been considered in this chapter because its effects are not predicted to be worse than the effects assessed during the construction and operational phases. The chapter assesses four principal impacts: a) effects of routine runoff on surface water bodies; b) effects of routine runoff on groundwater; c) pollution impacts from spillages; and d) flood impacts. 15.1.2 Although Interim Advice Note (”IAN”) 161/13 ‘Managed Motorways, All lane running’ (Ref 15-1) has scoped out the assessment of ‘Road Drainage and the Water Environment’ for smart motorway schemes, the assessment is required to ensure the protection of the water environment, to prevent its degradation, and ensure adequate mitigation measures are in place to prevent any adverse impacts. 15.1.3 The road drainage and water environment assessment for the Scheme has been undertaken in accordance with standard industry practice and statutory guidance. 15.1.4 This chapter details the methodology followed for the assessment, and summarises the regulatory and policy framework relating to road drainage and the water environment. -
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Contents 1.0 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT 1.1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment 1.2 Winter 2012 Floods 1.2.1 Maidenhead Windsor and Eton FAS 1.2.2 Temporary defences in Windsor 1.2.3 Old Windsor 1.2.4 Datchet 1.2.5 Wraysbury 1.3 Recovery Projects 1.3.1 Taplow Washout 1.3.2 Cookham and North Maidenhead Flood Wall Repairs 1.3.3 Black Potts Washout 1.3.4 Eton End School Bund, Datchet 1.3.5 Bund Removal, Datchet 1.4 Community Engagement 1.4.1 Cookham Parish 1.4.2 Bisham Flood Alleviation Scheme 1.4.3 Datchet 1.4.4 Wraysbury 1.4.5 Ham Island 1.4.6 River Level Data and ‘Parishes Live’ 1.4.7 Environment Agency.Gov Website Live 1.5 Insurance Related Information 1.6 River Maintenance 1.7 River Bed levels surveys 1.8 Flooded Land at Little Common Farm, Eton Wick 1.9 Flood and Water Management Act 2.0 PLANNING 2.1 Planning Charge 2.2 Maidenhead Waterways Restoration and Town Centre Regeneration 2.3 Travellers Site - Datchet 2.4 Bray Road Maidenhead – proposed school 2.5 RBWM Borough Local Plan 2014 Preferred options consultation 2.6 Position Statement for replacement dwellings 3.0 WASTE 3.1 Brayfield Farm 3.2 Horton Brook Quarry – Colnbrook 4.0 HYDROPOWER 5.0 WATERWAYS 5.1 Speed and Wash campaign 5.2 Waterways Volunteers 5.3 Magna Carta Celebrations 6.0 WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE 7.0 WATER RESOURCES 1 OFFICIAL 1.0 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT 1.1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment We recently met to discuss the River Thames Scheme (Datchet to Teddington), which is included in the Royal Borough’s SFRA. -
Bagendon Draft 1.0
VCH Gloucestershire: Volume XVI, Bagendon Draft 1.0 BAGENDON THE VILLAGE OF BAGENDON is situated 21 km. (13 miles) south-east of Gloucester and 5 km. (3 miles) north of Cirencester. The parish lies within the valley of the river Churn, which forms part of its eastern boundary, whilst the village lies across one of the river’s tributaries. Although the parish was the site of a significant prehistoric settlement, the ditches of which have divided Bagendon from the neighbouring estate of North Cerney since at least the 9th century, the medieval and modern village has never been populous. The construction of a turnpike between Cirencester and Cheltenham accelerated development along its course, spurring the fringe of Bagendon to acquire a suburban quality during the 20th century. Nevertheless, the abiding characteristic of the parish remains rural and agricultural, with only the ancient mill providing any significant industrial activity before recent times. LANDSCAPE, SETTLEMENT AND BUILT CHARACTER BOUNDARIES The parish measured 1,106 a. in 1792,1 and still in 1841, recalculated to 1,146 a. in 1891.2 The parish is long and narrow in shape, measuring almost 5 km. (c.3 miles) from north to south and 1½ km. (c.1 mile) across from east to west, although in places it contracts to less than 500 m. (c.546 yds) in width. The boundaries of the parish were depicted on the enclosure map of 1792,3 and for much of their length they follow clear topographical features such as roads and waterways. To the east and north, the boundary is defined by the river Churn, its tributary the Bagendon brook, a road running north from the brook to Woodmancote, and a lane running south-west to the brook. -
Newsletter 70
Registered Charity No : 1075175 Issue 70 WYCOMBE Contents and Chairman’s chat 2 SOUTH BUCKS New members E-mail version of newsletter 3 Burnham Beeches walk Above: Jay, seen regularly in members’ gardens W Life in ponds and streams 4 recently (see page 12) Below: Ash - will it survive Fungus walk at Holtspur Bank 5 ash dieback? (see page11) NI The Honey Bee and its relations 6 Recommended bee plants 7 L Successful day with Earthworks 8 EReviving the Wye 9 D Other Revive the Wye news 10 Ash dieback 11 L Member comments W COPY DATE FOR THE Wildlife observations 12 NEXT ISSUE I Contact and membership details Friday 5th April 2013 Wycombe Wildlife Newsis published 3 times a year to promote the S Group and wildlife issues and inform members and the public of its F activities. Produced by: Roger Wilding Photographs:Earthworks (Gomm’s Wood), Penny Cullington (fungi) and Roger Wilding (others) E Drawings: Frances Wilding Printed by : Design & Print, Wycombe District Council. Views expressed in this newsletter are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Group. For the purposes of management of the Group, membership information is held on computer. JANUARY 2013 Chairman’s Chat n the last issue of our newsletter, I referred to the advice I had received that if I couldn’t Ithink of anything else to say, I could always rely on the weather as a talking point. On this occasion, so much is happening that I don’t have time to even think about the weather. First of all, we have been debating the rising costs of posting our newsletter to members to whom we cannot deliver by hand, and we have been experimenting with other methods of distribution, as well as reviewing some of the hand delivery rounds. -
MILL LANE, TAPLOW Otter Survey and River Corridor Survey (RCS) Report
MILL LANE, TAPLOW Otter Survey and River Corridor Survey (RCS) Report 20/08/2014 Quality Management Issue/revision Issue 1 Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks Final for Comment FINAL – updated figures and camera survey dates Date 20th June 2014 20th August 2014 Prepared by S Foot and E S Foot and E Austin Austin Signature Checked by H Spray H Spray Signature Authorised by T Selwyn T Selwyn Signature Project number 62002667 62002667 Report number File reference Project number: 62002667 Dated: 20/08/2014 2 Revised: Mill Lane, Taplow Otter Survey and River Corridor Survey (RCS) Report 20/08/2014 Client Berkeley Homes (Three Valleys) Ltd Berkeley House Farnham Lane Farnham Royal SL2 3RQ Consultant WSP UK Ltd Mountbatten House Basingstoke RG21 4HJ UK Tel: +44 (0)12 5631 8617 Fax: +44 1256 318 700 www.wspgroup.co.uk Registered Address WSP UK Limited 01383511 WSP House, 70 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1AF WSP Contacts Karen McAllister 3 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ............................................................... 5 2 Introduction ............................................................................ 6 2.1 Project Background ............................................................... 6 2.2 Ecological Background .......................................................... 7 2.3 Brief and Objectives............................................................... 8 3 Methods ................................................................................. 8 3.1 Otter Survey ......................................................................... -
Sediment Impact Anaysis for the Lower Thames Flood Strategy Study
PROCEEDINGS of the Eighth Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference (8thFISC), April2-6, 2006, Reno, NV, USA SEDIMENT IMPACT ANAYSIS FOR THE LOWER THAMES FLOOD STRATEGY STUDY Ian M Tomes, SE Area Flood Risk Manager, Environment Agency (Thames Region), Frimley, Surrey, UK, [email protected]; Oliver P. Harmar, Consultant Geomorphologist, Halcrow Group, Leeds, UK, [email protected]; Colin R. Thorne, Professor of Physical Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK, [email protected], INTRODUCTION Sediment impact assessment was performed during the Lower Thames Flood Strategy Study to assess the geomorphological sustainability of river-bed re-profiling to reduce flood risk in the reach between Datchet and Teddington. The specific objectives of the sediment study were to: i. estimate how much sediment is likely to be deposited in, or eroded from, the study reach by flows up to and including long return interval flood events for ‘do minimum’ and ‘bed reprofiling’ options that would lower the bed by 0.5 to 1 m; ii. estimate an average annual rate of sedimentation for the ‘do minimum’ and ‘bed reprofiling’ options. MORPHOLOGY OF THE RIVER THAMES The study reach of the River Thames has the characteristics of a mature, lowland river with well developed meanders and reaches divided by stable, mid-channel islands. The movement of water and sediment along the river has been controlled by locks and weirs for over a century. These structures present obstructions to the natural movement of sediment and dredging was, historically, required to maintain a navigable channel. The banks along much of the navigable river have been stabilised by revetment and, therefore, the river is unable to adjust its planform. -
Paranoia on the Nile
The politics of flood insecurity Framing contested river management projects Jeroen F. Warner Promotoren: Prof. Dr. Ir. D.J.M. Hilhorst Hoogleraar Humanitaire Hulp en Wederopbouw Prof. Dr. Ir. C. Leeuwis Hoogleraar Communicatie en Innovatie Studies Promotiecommissie Prof. Dr. J.A. Allan King‟s College, London Prof. Dr. H.J.M. Goverde Wageningen Universiteit / Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen Prof. Dr. Mr. B.J.M. van der Meulen Wageningen Universiteit Prof. Dr. J.H. de Wilde Rijksuniversiteit Groningen Dit onderzoek is uitgevoerd binnen de onderzoeksschool CERES – Research School for Resource Studies for Development. The politics of flood insecurity Framing contested river management projects Jeroen F. Warner Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 18 maart 2008 des namiddags om 16.00 uur in de Aula. Jeroen F. Warner The politics of flood insecurity Framing contested river management projects ISBN 978-80-8504-897-8 Table of Contents List of Figures, Tables and Boxes List of Abbreviations 1. Introduction: The politics of floods and fear 1 2. Midnight at Noon? The dispute over Toshka, Egypt 31 3. Resisting the Turkish pax aquarum? The Ilısu Dam dispute as a multi-level struggle 57 4. Turkey and Egypt – tales of war, peace and hegemony 83 5. Death of the mega-projects? The controversy over Flood Action Plan 20, Bangladesh 111 6. The Maaswerken project: Fixing a hole? 145 7. Public Participation in emergency flood storage in the Ooij polder – a bridge too far? 173 8. -
The Cotswold Canals
Locks River Severn Stroudwater Navigation Thames & Severn Canal (West) 13 1 Foundry 1 Wallbridge Lower Upper Gloucester & Sharpness 2 Dudbridge 2 Wallbridge Upper Framilode Canal to Gloucester 12 3-4 Ryeford Double 3 Bowbridge 5 Newtown 4 Grin’s Mill Saul 6 Blunder 5 Ham Mill The Cotswold Canals 7 Pike 6 Hope Mill to Sharpness a restoration and walking map 8 Dock 7 Gough’s Orchard Whitminster 9 Westeld 8 Bourne 11 A38 M5 9a New M5 Lock 9 Beales Frampton- 10 Bristol Road (re-sited) 10 St Mary’s 11 Whitminster 11 Ile’s Mill on-Severn B4071 12 Junction 12 Ballinger’s 10 13 Framilode 13 Chalford Chapel Map Key A419 14 Bell Canal 15 Red Lion navigable New route proposed 16 Valley 9a Stroudwater Thames & 17-18 Baker’s Mill in water under M5 sharing Navigation Severn Canal dry or reeded River Frome bridge 9-8 19-20 Puck Mill 21-22 Whitehall inlled plus new lock 7-6 Stroud towpath / footpath 5 23 Bathurst Meadow Eastington 24-26 Siccaridge Wood Locks Stonehouse Ebley 1 Wallbridge 2 Cotswold Canals Trust Visitor Centres are at 27 Daneway Basin fully restored Bond’s 28 Daneway Upper structure restored Capel’s Mill Saul, Wallbridge Lock (Stroud) Mill & Bond’s Mill (Stonehouse) restoration in progress The Ocean 2-1 unrestored Upper 4-3 Mills Bath A46 3 Bowbridge missing / new lock required Ryeford A419 Bridges Grins Mill 4 A419 Sapperton Canal Tunnel xed bridge - restored or intact Thrupp Chalford Daneway Portal lift-bridge Towpath closures likely during Ham Mill 5 19-21 restored swing-bridge Brimscombe restoration works. -
The Cotswolds Berkshire Downs North Wessex Downs
THE THAMES THROUGH TIME The Archaeology of the Gravel Terraces of the Upper and Middle Thames: The Thames Valley in the Medieval and Post-Medieval Periods AD 1000-2000 River Evenlode River Glyme River Cherwell The Cotswolds River Ray River Windrush River Churn Eynsham River Leach " River Thame River Coln " OXFORD Chilterns FAIRFORD " CIRENCESTER " River Chess " LECHLADE e ABINGDON" River Misbourn " DORCHESTER " River Ock R River Wye CRICKLADE i v e r e T River Lea or Le h a m e s River Ray WALLINGFORD Marlow " Cookham " Colne Brook Henley-on-Thames " MAIDENHEAD LONDON " " " Goring mes Berkshire Downs ETON Tha " r River Lambourn e v " i R WINDSOR " River Pang READING " STAINES River Kennet " KINGSTON UPON THAMES " River Loddon CHERTSEY River Mole River Hart Blackwater River North Wessex Downs North Downs Guildford " River Wey 0 20 km Figure 1: The Thames Valley and surrounding region showing topography, rivers and main historic settlements (map courtesy of the British Geological Survey) THE THAMES THROUGH TIME The Archaeology of the Gravel Terraces of the Upper and Middle Thames: The Thames Valley in the Medieval and Post-Medieval Periods AD 1000-2000 Figure 2: 14th-century watermill and eel trap from the Luttrell Psalter (©British Library) THE THAMES THROUGH TIME The Archaeology of the Gravel Terraces of the Upper and Middle Thames: The Thames Valley in the Medieval and Post-Medieval Periods AD 1000-2000 Figure 3: The London Stone, Staines, Surrey (©Historic England) THE THAMES THROUGH TIME The Archaeology of the Gravel Terraces of the Upper and Middle Thames: The Thames Valley in the Medieval and Post-Medieval Periods AD 1000-2000 Figure 4: Abbey Mills, Chertsey, Surrey, c 1870 (©Historic England) THE THAMES THROUGH TIME The Archaeology of the Gravel Terraces of the Upper and Middle Thames: The Thames Valley in the Medieval and Post-Medieval Periods AD 1000-2000 Figure 5: Artist’s impression of Blackfriars ship 3 (after Marsden 1996, 88, fig. -
WILD Project Rivers Management Plan for Fairford Parish
WILD Project Rivers Management Plan for Fairford Parish May 2016 1 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................................................. 2 1 Background to the Report ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Overview of the River Coln .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 The River Coln at Fairford Town Parish ....................................................................................................... 3 1.3 River Coln Biodiversity Value ....................................................................................................................... 4 2 Future management options to improve ecological status ............................................................................ 6 2.1 Fencing & Bank Repairs ............................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Tree management ........................................................................................................................................ 6 2.3 Invasive Species Control .............................................................................................................................. 6 2.6 Barriers to Fish Migration ...........................................................................................................................