Ha Minh Tam, Nguyen Khac Khoi, Vu Xuan Phuong Summary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ha Minh Tam, Nguyen Khac Khoi, Vu Xuan Phuong Summary 27(4): 46-49 T¹p chÝ Sinh häc 12-2005 Bæ sung mét loµi thuéc chi giã kh¬i-Lepisanthes Blume (Hä bå hßn-Sapindaceae Juss .) cho hÖ thùc vËt ViÖt Nam Hµ Minh T©m Tr−êng ®¹i häc S− ph¹m Hµ Néi 2 NguyÔn Kh¾c Kh«i, Vò Xu©n Ph−¬ng ViÖn Sinh th¸i vµ Tµi nguyªn sinh vËt Trªn thÕ giíi, chi Lepisanthes Blume D−íi ®©y lµ mét sè th«ng tin vÒ chi Lepisanthes (Sapindaceae Juss.) cã 24 loµi, ph©n bè ë kh¾p Blume vµ loµi L. unilocularis Leenh.: c¸c vïng nhiÖt ®íi cña ch©u Phi, Ma®agaxca, Nam ¸ vµ §«ng Nam ¸, tõ Xri Lanca tíi Trung LEPISANTHES Blume-Giã kh¬i , Quèc, qua vïng Malesia tíi vïng T©y B¾c L©n hïng ¤xtr©ylia. Theo Lecomte (1912), Gagnepain (1950), Ph¹m Hoµng Hé (2000), TrÇn Kim Liªn Blume, 1825. Bijdr. 5: 237; H. Lecomte, & Hµ Minh T©m (2003)..., ë ViÖt Nam chi nµy 1912. Fl. Gen. Indoch. 1: 1016; Leenh. 1969. cã 6 loµi lµ: L. amplifolia, (Pierre) Leenh., L. Blumea, 17: 33; H. S. Lo & T. C. Chen, 1985. banaensis Gagnep., L. fruticosa (Roxb.) Leenh., Fl. Reip. Pop. Sin. 47(1): 22; Leenh. 1994. Fl. L. rubiginosa (Roxb.) Leenh., L. senegalensis Mal. I. 11: 627; Welzen, 1999. Fl. Thail. 7(1): (Poir.) Leenh. vµ L. tetraphylla (Vahl) Radlk. 212; T. K. Liªn & H. M. T©m, 2003. Checklist Trong qu¸ tr×nh nghiªn cøu c¸c mÉu vËt Pl. Sp. Vietn. 2: 1020. - Aphania Blume, 1825. thuéc chi Lepisanthes Blume, chóng t«i ® kiÓm Bijdr. 5: 236. - Erioglossum Blume, 1825. Bijdr. tra vµ x¸c ®Þnh mÉu mang sè hiÖu Vò Dòng 36 5: 229. - Otophora Blume, 1847. Rumphia, 3: (thu t¹i An Héi, An Khª, Gia Lai, ngµy 142. - Otolepis Turcz. 1848. Bull. Soc. Nat. 19/8/1979) thuéc loµi Lepisanthes unilocularis Mosc. 21: 572, fig. 2b, 3a. -Hemigyrosa Blume, Leenh. Kh¸c biÖt râ nhÊt cña loµi nµy víi tÊt c¶ 1850. Rumphia, 3: 165. c¸c loµi kh¸c trong chi lµ bÇu vµ qu¶ lu«n cã 1 C©y gç hoÆc c©y bôi. C¸c bé phËn non «. th−êng cã l«ng ®¬n, Ýt khi nh½n hoµn toµn. L¸ Cho ®Õn nay, L. unilocularis míi chØ ®−îc kÐp l«ng chim ch½n hoÆc lÎ, gåm 1-40 ®«i l¸ ph¸t hiÖn ë ®¶o H¶i Nam, Trung Quèc. Nh− chÐt, hiÕm khi chØ cã 1 l¸ chÐt; cuèng chung vµ vËy, viÖc ph¸t hiÖn loµi nµy ë ViÖt Nam kh«ng cuèng l¸ cã hoÆc kh«ng cã c¸nh; cã hoÆc kh«ng nh÷ng bæ sung cho hÖ thùc vËt cña n−íc ta 1 cã l¸ kÌm gi¶ . L¸ chÐt mäc ®èi hoÆc mäc c¸ch; loµi c©y hiÕm gÆp mµ cßn cung cÊp dÉn liÖu míi gèc c©n hoÆc lÖch; mÐp nguyªn; hai mÆt l¸ vÒ sù ph©n bè cña chóng. Ngoµi ra, Leenhouts th−êng cã l«ng, kh«ng cã lç tuyÕn; g©n bªn kÐo c«ng bè loµi nµy n¨m 1969 dùa vµo mÉu S. K. dµi tíi gÇn mÐp hoÆc vÊn hîp. Côm hoa d¹ng Lau 5773 chØ cã qu¶; tõ ®ã ®Õn nay, ch−a cã t¸c chïy, th−êng ph©n nh¸nh, mäc ë n¸ch l¸ gÇn gi¶ nµo t×m ®−îc mÉu cã hoa v× vËy c«ng tr×nh ®Ønh cµnh, ë ®Ønh cµnh hoÆc ë phÇn th©n kh«ng cña chóng t«i cßn bæ sung cho b¶n m« t¶ gèc mang l¸, th−êng cã l«ng. L¸ b¾c vµ l¸ b¾c nhá cña Leenhouts mét sè th«ng tin vÒ hoa cña loµi h×nh m¸c, h×nh trøng hoÆc h×nh ®−êng. Hoa gi¶ nµy. t¹p tÝnh (pseudomixis ) [C©y cã hoa “gi¶ t¹p C«ng tr×nh ®−îc hç trî vÒ kinh phÝ cña Ch−¬ng tr×nh nghiªn cøu c¬ b¶n. 46 tÝnh” ( pseudomixis ) lµ c©y cã kiÓu hoa kh¸ ®Æc cuèng ng¾n, chia thïy hoÆc kh«ng, (1-)2-3(-4) biÖt: c¸c thµnh phÇn cña hoa gièng hÖt hoa «, th−êng cã l«ng; mçi « chøa 1 non; cã vßi l−ìng tÝnh, nh−ng chøc n¨ng cña hoa lµ ®¬n tÝnh nhôy hoÆc kh«ng; nóm nhôy h×nh cÇu hoÆc d¹ng (ë hoa mang tÝnh ®ùc th× bao phÊn cã h¹t phÊn vßm cñ hµnh, ®«i khi h¬i chia thïy. Qu¶ h¹ch, vµ më ®−îc, cßn bé nhôy kh«ng t¹o qu¶; ë hoa h¬i cã thïy hoÆc xÎ s©u thµnh 2-3 gi¶ ph©n qu¶ mang tÝnh c¸i bao phÊn kh«ng cã h¹t phÊn vµ (pseudofruitlet ) [KiÓu qu¶ xÎ s©u thµnh c¸c “gi¶ kh«ng më, cßn bé nhôy ph¸t triÓn thµnh qu¶). ph©n qu¶” ( pseudofruitlet ) lµ kiÓu qu¶ ®Æc tr−ng ThuËt ng÷ “gi¶ t¹p tÝnh” do NguyÔn TiÕn B©n ®Ò cho hä Sapindaceae (nh− ë V¶i, Nhn, Ch«m xuÊt], cïng gèc, ®Òu. §µi rêi, gåm 4-5(-6) l¸ ch«m, v.v…) vµ mét sè hä kh¸c (vÝ dô ®µi, xÕp lîp, 1-2 l¸ phÝa ngoµi (th−êng h×nh Ochnaceae); ë chóng cã bé nhôy hîp, nh−ng khi trßn) nhá h¬n nh÷ng l¸ bªn trong (th−êng h×nh thµnh qu¶ chØ phÇn bÇu ph¸t triÓn thµnh c¸c trøng réng hoÆc h×nh thu«n). C¸nh hoa 4-5(-6); ph©n qu¶ vµ kh«ng cã dÊu vÕt cña vßi nhôy ë th−êng h×nh trøng ng−îc ®Õn h×nh th×a, ng¾n ®Ønh. ThuËt ng÷ “gi¶ ph©n qu¶” do NguyÔn TiÕn h¬n hoÆc dµi h¬n ®µi; gèc c¸nh hoa th−êng cã B©n ®Ò xuÊt], Ýt khi nguyªn; vá qu¶ máng hoÆc cùa, mÆt trong cã 1 v¶y, ®«i khi gièng nh− mét dµy, nh½n hoÆc h¬i cã nèt, cã l«ng hoÆc kh«ng vµnh rËm l«ng hoÆc 1 ®«i thïy tai nhá; v¶y cã cã l«ng. H¹t h×nh bÇu dôc hoÆc h×nh trøng, hai mµo hoÆc kh«ng . TriÒn tuyÕn mËt h×nh vµnh bªn th−êng h¬i dÑp, mµu x¸m hoÆc mµu ®en, khuyªn, nguyªn th−êng h¬i chia thïy hoÆc ng¾t nh½n hoÆc thØnh tho¶ng cã rËm l«ng; rèn h¹t gÇn qung. NhÞ (4-)8(-18), th−êng kh«ng thß khái h×nh trßn; kh«ng cã tö y. trµng ë hoa ®ùc; chØ nhÞ th−êng nhiÒu l«ng; bao Typus: phÊn h×nh bÇu dôc hoÆc h×nh thu«n, ®Ýnh gèc, Lepisanthes montana Blume [= nh½n hoÆc cã l«ng. BÇu kh«ng cuèng hoÆc cã Lepisanthes tetraphylla (Vahl) Radlk.] Kho¸ §Þnh lo¹i c¸c loµi thuéc chi Lepisanthes B lume ® biÕt ë ViÖt Nam 1A. Trµng ng¾n h¬n ®µi. ChØ nhÞ ng¾n h¬n bao phÊn. Lu«n cã l¸ kÌm gi¶ tån t¹i. ( Subgen.1 . Otophora ). 2A. BÇu vµ qu¶ lu«n cã 1 «. L¸ kÐp l«ng chim lÎ.................................................. 1. L. unilocularis 2B. BÇu vµ qu¶ cã 2-3(-4) «. L¸ kÐp l«ng chim ch½n (thØnh tho¶ng tr«ng nh− lÎ do 1 l¸ chÐt ®Ønh tiªu gi¶m m¹nh). 3A. L¸ kÌm gi¶ cã g©n ch©n vÞt hoÆc m¹ng l−íi, hiÕm khi cã g©n l«ng chim. C¸nh hoa cã 2 tai hoÆc 1 v¶y nhá uèn ng−îc............................................................................... 2. L. fructicosa 3B. L¸ kÌm gi¶ cã g©n l«ng chim. C¸nh hoa cã 1 v¶y to, v¶y cã 3 gãc ................ 3. L. amplifolia 1B. Trµng dµi b»ng hoÆc dµi h¬n ®µi. ChØ nhÞ dµi b»ng hoÆc dµi h¬n bao phÊn. HiÕm khi cã l¸ kÌm gi¶ sím rông (xem L. seneganensis). 4A. Trµng dµi b»ng ®µi. ThØnh tho¶ng cã l¸ kÌm gi¶ nh−ng sím rông ( Subgen.2 . Aphania ) ....... ...................................................................................................................... 4. L. senegalensis 4B. Trµng dµi h¬n ®µi. Kh«ng cã l¸ kÌm gi¶. 5A. Qu¶ xÎ s©u thµnh gi¶ ph©n qu¶. C¶ hai mÆt l¸ chÐt cã l«ng, nhÊt lµ ë g©n chÝnh vµ g©n bªn. Côm hoa ë ®Ønh vµ n¸ch l¸ gÇn ®Ønh ( Subgen.3. Erioglossum ) ........... 5. L. rubiginosa 5B. Qu¶ th−êng chØ cã gê. L¸ chÐt hÇu nh− kh«ng cã l«ng. Côm hoa ë cµnh kh«ng mang l¸ hoÆc ë n¸ch l¸, hiÕm khi ë ®Ønh ( Subgen.4 . Lepisanthes ). 6A. NhÞ 10-13. Gèc côm hoa cã nh¸nh mäc ®èi ch÷ thËp. .................................6. L. banaensis 6B. NhÞ th−êng 8. Côm hoa kh«ng cã nh¸nh mäc ®èi ch÷ thËp......................... 7. L. tetraphylla 47 Lepisanthes unilocularis Leenh. 1. cµnh mang hoa vµ qu¶; 2. mÆt ngoµi c¸nh hoa; 3. mÆt trong c¸nh hoa; 4. mÆt trong vÈy; 5. nhÞ; 6. bÇu (bæ däc); 7. bÇu (c¾t ngang). (h×nh vÏ theo mÉu Vò Dòng 36, HN) Lepisanthes unilocularis Leenh. - Qu¶ má , long., 0.8-1.2 mm lat., glabrum; stylus brevis, Giã kh¬i mét « graber; stigma grabrum, subcapitatum. C©y bôi cao 1,5 m. Cµnh mang hoa cã lç vá Leenh.
Recommended publications
  • I Is the Sunda-Sahul Floristic Exchange Ongoing?
    Is the Sunda-Sahul floristic exchange ongoing? A study of distributions, functional traits, climate and landscape genomics to investigate the invasion in Australian rainforests By Jia-Yee Samantha Yap Bachelor of Biotechnology Hons. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2018 Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation i Abstract Australian rainforests are of mixed biogeographical histories, resulting from the collision between Sahul (Australia) and Sunda shelves that led to extensive immigration of rainforest lineages with Sunda ancestry to Australia. Although comprehensive fossil records and molecular phylogenies distinguish between the Sunda and Sahul floristic elements, species distributions, functional traits or landscape dynamics have not been used to distinguish between the two elements in the Australian rainforest flora. The overall aim of this study was to investigate both Sunda and Sahul components in the Australian rainforest flora by (1) exploring their continental-wide distributional patterns and observing how functional characteristics and environmental preferences determine these patterns, (2) investigating continental-wide genomic diversities and distances of multiple species and measuring local species accumulation rates across multiple sites to observe whether past biotic exchange left detectable and consistent patterns in the rainforest flora, (3) coupling genomic data and species distribution models of lineages of known Sunda and Sahul ancestry to examine landscape-level dynamics and habitat preferences to relate to the impact of historical processes. First, the continental distributions of rainforest woody representatives that could be ascribed to Sahul (795 species) and Sunda origins (604 species) and their dispersal and persistence characteristics and key functional characteristics (leaf size, fruit size, wood density and maximum height at maturity) of were compared.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Tropical Rainforest Plants - Online Edition
    Australian Tropical Rainforest Plants - Online edition Family Profile Sapindaceae Family Description A family of 150 genera and 2000 species, pantropic; about 30 genera occur naturally in Australia. Genera Alectryon - A genus of about 30 species in Malesia, Australia, New Zealand, New Caledonia and the Pacific islands; nine species occur naturally in Australia. Acevedo-Rodriguez et al. (2011); Harden et al. (2014); Leenhouts (1988); Reynolds (1982, 1985b, 1987, 1991); Stanley & Ross (1983). Allophylus - A monotypic genus in Africa, Asia, Malesia and Australia. Leenhouts (1967); Reynolds (1985b). Arytera - A genus of about 25 species in Malesia, Australia and New Caledonia; ten species occur naturally in Australia. Acevedo- Rodriguez et al. (2011); Cooper & Cooper (2004); Ham (1977b); Reynolds (1985a, 1985b); Turner (1995). Atalaya - A genus of 11 species in Africa, Malesia and Australia; nine species occur naturally in Australia. Reynolds (1985b). Cardiospermum - A genus of 12 species mainly in tropical America; two species have become naturalised in Australia. Reynolds (1985b). Castanospora - A monotypic genus endemic to Australia. Reynolds (1984, 1985b). Cnesmocarpon - A genus of four species in New Guinea and Australia; one species occurs naturally in Australia. Adema et al. (1994). Cossinia - A genus of 4 species occuring in Mascarene Islands, New Caledonia, Fiji and Australia. Reynolds (1982, 1985b). Cupaniopsis - A genus of 65-70 species in New Guinea, Australia, New Caledonia and the Pacific islands; 11 species occur naturally in Australia. Reynolds (1984, 1985b). Dictyoneura - A genus of nine species in Malesia and Australia; one species occurs naturally in Australia. Dijk (1986); Reynolds (1985a, 1985b). Dimocarpus - A genus of six species in Asia, Malesia and Australia; two species occur naturally in Australia and one species has become naturalised.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptations to Heterogenous Habitats: Life-History Characters of Trees and Shrubs
    ADAPTATIONS TO HETEROGENOUS HABITATS: LIFE-HISTORY CHARACTERS OF TREES AND SHRUBS By AMY ELISE ZANNE A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2003 To my mother, Linda Stephenson, who has always supported and encouraged me from near and afar and to the rest of my family members, especially my brother, Ben Stephenson, who wanted me to keep this short. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Colin Chapman, for his continued support and enthusiasm throughout my years as a graduate student. He was willing to follow me along the many permutations of potential research projects that quickly became more and more botanical in nature. His generosity has helped me to finish my project and keep my sanity. I would also like to thank my committee members, Walter Judd, Kaoru Kitajima, Jack Putz, and Colette St. Mary. Each has contributed greatly to my project development, research design, and dissertation write-up, both in and outside of their areas of expertise. I would especially like to thank Kaoru Kitajima for choosing to come to University of Florida precisely as I was developing my dissertation ideas. Without her presence and support, this dissertation would be a very different one. I would like to thank Ugandan field assistants and friends, Tinkasiimire Astone, Kaija Chris, Irumba Peter, and Florence Akiiki. Their friendship and knowledge carried me through many a day. Patrick Chiyo, Scot Duncan, John Paul, and Sarah Schaack greatly assisted me in species identifications and project setup.
    [Show full text]
  • Deinbollia Onanae (Sapindaceae), a New, Endangered, Montane Tree Species from the Cameroon Highlands
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.24.353680; this version posted October 26, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Deinbollia onanae (Sapindaceae), a new, Endangered, montane tree species from the Cameroon Highlands. Martin Cheek¹, Jean Michel Onana2,3 ¹Science, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, U.K. 2 University of Yaoundé I, Faculty of Science, Department of Plant Biology P.O Box 812 Yaoundé, Cameroon 3National Herbarium of Cameroon Yaoundé, PO Box 1601, Cameroon Corresponding author: Martin Cheek¹ Email address: [email protected] Key words: Bannerman’s Turaco, Monoecious, high altitude, forest clearance, Litchi group, Preuss’s monkey, ABSTRACT Deinbollia onanae (Sapindaceae-Litchi clade) is here formally named and characterised as a new species to science, previously known as Deinbollia sp. 2. Cameroon has the highest species- diversity and species endemism known in this African-Western Indian Ocean genus of 42 species. Deinbollia onanae is an infrequent tree species known from five locations in surviving islands of montane (or upper submontane) forest along the line of the Cameroon Highlands. It is here assessed as Endangered according to the IUCN 2012 standard, threatened mainly by clearance of forest for agriculture. The majority of tree species characteristic of montane forest (above 2000 m alt.) in the Cameroon Highlands are also widespread in East African mountains (i.e. are Afromontane). Deinbollia onanae is one of only a very small number of species that are endemic (globally restricted to) the mountain range.
    [Show full text]
  • Hainan-BR-2.Pdf
    Bot. Rev. (2010) 76:346–376 DOI 10.1007/s12229-010-9055-7 Seed Plant Endemism on Hainan Island: A Framework for Conservation Actions Javier Francisco-Ortega1,2 & Zhong-Sheng Wang3,12 & Fa-Guo Wang4 & Fu-Wu Xing4 & Hong Liu2,5 & Han Xu6 & Wei-Xiang Xu3 & Yi-Bo Luo7 & Xi-Qiang Song8 & Stephan Gale9 & David E. Boufford10 & Mike Maunder1,2,11 & Shu-Qing An3,12 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami FL33199, USA 2 Center for Tropical Plant Conservation, Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden, Coral Gables, Miami, FL 33156, USA 3 Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Global Change, School of Life Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, People’s Republic of China 4 South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, People’s Republic of China 5 Department of Earth and Environment, Florida International University, Miami FL33199, USA 6 Research Institute of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou 510520, People’s Republic of China 7 Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, People’s Republic of China 8 Key Laboratory of Tropical Horticultural Plant Resources and Genetic Improvement, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, People’s Republic of China 9 Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden, Lam Kam Road, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, People’s Republic of China 10 Harvard University Herbaria, 22 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 11 Al Ain Wildlife Park and Resort, PO Box 1204, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates 12 Authors for Correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Published online: 20 May 2010 # The New York Botanical Garden 2010 Abstract Hainan, the second largest island of China, has the most extensive and best preserved tropical forests of this country.
    [Show full text]
  • Sapindaceae) with a New Concept of Supertribe Paulliniodae Author(S): Pedro Acevedo-Rodríguez, Kenneth J
    Generic Relationships and Classification of Tribe Paullinieae (Sapindaceae) with a New Concept of Supertribe Paulliniodae Author(s): Pedro Acevedo-Rodríguez, Kenneth J. Wurdack, M. Silvia Ferrucci, Gabriel Johnson, Pedro Dias, Rubens G. Coelho, Genise V. Somner, Victor W. Steinmann, Elizabeth A. Zimmer, and Mark T. Strong Source: Systematic Botany, 42(1):96-114. Published By: The American Society of Plant Taxonomists URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1600/036364417X694926 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Systematic Botany (2017), 42(1): pp. 96–114 © Copyright 2017 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists DOI 10.1600/036364417X694926 Date of publication March 1, 2017 Generic Relationships and Classification of Tribe Paullinieae (Sapindaceae) with a New Concept of Supertribe Paulliniodae Pedro Acevedo-Rodríguez,1,6 Kenneth J. Wurdack,1 M. Silvia Ferrucci,2 Gabriel Johnson,1 Pedro Dias,3 Rubens G.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Circumscription of Sapindaceae Revisited: Molecular Sequence Data, Morphology and Biogeography Support Recognition of a New Family, Xanthoceraceae
    Plant Ecology and Evolution 143 (2): 148–159, 2010 doi:10.5091/plecevo.2010.437 REGULAR PAPER Phylogeny and circumscription of Sapindaceae revisited: molecular sequence data, morphology and biogeography support recognition of a new family, Xanthoceraceae Sven Buerki1, Porter P. Lowry II2,3,*, Nadir Alvarez4, Sylvain G. Razafimandimbison5, Philippe Küpfer6 & Martin W. Callmander2,7 1Department of Biodiversity and Conservation, Real Jardin Botanico, CSIC, Plaza de Murillo 2, ES-28014 Madrid, Spain 2Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63166-0299, U.S.A. 3Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Case Postale 39, 57 rue Cuvier, FR-75231 05 CEDEX, Paris, France 4Department of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland 5Department of Botany, Bergius Foundation, SE-10691, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden 6Institute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Rue Emile-Argand 11, CH-2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland 7Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la ville de Genève, ch. de l’Impératrice 1, CH-1292 Chambésy, Switzerland *Author for correspondence: [email protected] Background and aims – Recent studies have adopted a broad definition of Sapindaceae that includes taxa traditionally placed in Aceraceae and Hippocastanaceae, achieving monophyly but yielding a family difficult to characterize and for which no obvious morphological synapomorphy exists. This expanded circumscription was necessitated by the finding that the monotypic, temperate Asian genus Xanthoceras, historically placed in Sapindaceae tribe Harpullieae, is basal within the group. Here we seek to clarify the relationships of Xanthoceras based on phylogenetic analyses using a dataset encompassing nearly ¾ of sapindaceous genera, comparing the results with information from morphology and biogeography, in particular with respect to the other taxa placed in Harpullieae.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Distribution and Evolution of Mycorrhizas in Land Plants
    Mycorrhiza (2006) 16: 299–363 DOI 10.1007/s00572-005-0033-6 REVIEW B. Wang . Y.-L. Qiu Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants Received: 22 June 2005 / Accepted: 15 December 2005 / Published online: 6 May 2006 # Springer-Verlag 2006 Abstract A survey of 659 papers mostly published since plants (Pirozynski and Malloch 1975; Malloch et al. 1980; 1987 was conducted to compile a checklist of mycorrhizal Harley and Harley 1987; Trappe 1987; Selosse and Le Tacon occurrence among 3,617 species (263 families) of land 1998;Readetal.2000; Brundrett 2002). Since Nägeli first plants. A plant phylogeny was then used to map the my- described them in 1842 (see Koide and Mosse 2004), only a corrhizal information to examine evolutionary patterns. Sev- few major surveys have been conducted on their phyloge- eral findings from this survey enhance our understanding of netic distribution in various groups of land plants either by the roles of mycorrhizas in the origin and subsequent diver- retrieving information from literature or through direct ob- sification of land plants. First, 80 and 92% of surveyed land servation (Trappe 1987; Harley and Harley 1987;Newman plant species and families are mycorrhizal. Second, arbus- and Reddell 1987). Trappe (1987) gathered information on cular mycorrhiza (AM) is the predominant and ancestral type the presence and absence of mycorrhizas in 6,507 species of of mycorrhiza in land plants. Its occurrence in a vast majority angiosperms investigated in previous studies and mapped the of land plants and early-diverging lineages of liverworts phylogenetic distribution of mycorrhizas using the classifi- suggests that the origin of AM probably coincided with the cation system by Cronquist (1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Check List 8(1): 113-129, 2012 © 2012 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (Available at Journal of Species Lists and Distribution
    Check List 8(1): 113-129, 2012 © 2012 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution Angiosperms of Sendirakillai Sacred Grove (SSG), PECIES S Cuddalore District, Tamil Nadu, India OF G. Gnanasekaran 1,3, P. Nehru 2,3 and D. Narasimhan3* ISTS L 1 Botanical Survey of India, Southern Regional Centre, TNAU Campus. Lawley Road, Coimbatore – 641 003. Tamil Nadu, India. 2 Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History. Anaikatty, Coimbatore – 641 108. Tamil Nadu, India. 3 Madras Christian College (Autonomous), Department of Plant Biology and Plant Biotechnology, Centre for Floristic Research (CFR). Tambaram, Chennai – 600 059. Tamil Nadu, India. * Corresponding Author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: We provide a checklist of Angiosperm alpha diversity of Sendirakillai Sacred Grove (SSG), a community conserved Tropical Dry Evergreen Forest (TDEF) fragment located on the Coromandel Coast of Cuddalore district (11°44’24” N, of79°47’24” 180 species E), Tamil and 2 Nadu,varieties South belonging India. Plant to 151 specimens genera distributed were collected in 66 familieseither with from flowers 29 orders or fruits according and were to Angiosperm identified and confirmed with available regional floras, revisions and monographs. In the present study, we have enumerated a total Rubiaceae (12), Cyperaceae (10), Apocynaceae (8), Poaceae (8) and Euphorbiaceae (7). Three endemic species to India Phylogeny Group III Classification. More than 30% of the total flora is represented by six families namely Fabaceae (14), and three species that are confined to peninsular India and Sri Lanka are recorded from the sacred grove.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Thinouia (Paullinieae, Sapindaceae) from the Amazon and Its Phylogenetic Placement
    PhytoKeys 165: 115–126 (2020) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.165.57341 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://phytokeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A new species of Thinouia (Paullinieae, Sapindaceae) from the Amazon and its phylogenetic placement Herison Medeiros1,3, Jenifer de Carvalho Lopes1, Pedro Acevedo-Rodríguez2, Rafaela Campostrini Forzza3 1 Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Botânica, Rua do Matão, 277, 05508-090 São Paulo, SP, Brazil 2 Department of Botany, MRC-166 Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, Washington D.C. 20013-7012, USA 3 Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Pacheco Leão, 915, 22460- 030, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Corresponding author: Herison Medeiros ([email protected]) Academic editor: Marc Appelhans | Received 7 August 2020 | Accepted 2 October 2020 | Published 28 October 2020 Citation: Medeiros H, de Carvalho Lopes J, Acevedo-Rodríguez P, Forzza RC (2020) A new species of Thinouia (Paullinieae, Sapindaceae) from the Amazon and its phylogenetic placement. PhytoKeys 165: 115–126. https://doi. org/10.3897/phytokeys.165.57341 Abstract Thinouia is a Neotropical genus of lianas with approximately 12 species and is the only genus in tribe Paullinieae with actinomorphic flowers. During a taxonomic revision of the genus and fieldwork in south- western Amazonia, we found a new species that appears similar to Thinouia trifoliata (ex Allosanthus) because of its racemiform inflorescence. However, before describing the new species, we had to confirm that Allosanthus was congeneric with Thinouia so we could place the new species in the correct genus. The results of the phylogenetic analysis, based on molecular data (trnL intron and ITS sequences), show that Allosanthus should be included in Thinouia.
    [Show full text]
  • SAPINDACEAE 无患子科 Wu Huan Zi Ke Xia Nianhe (夏念和)1; Paul A
    SAPINDACEAE 无患子科 wu huan zi ke Xia Nianhe (夏念和)1; Paul A. Gadek2 Trees or shrubs (or woody vines with tendrils in Cardiospermum and allied genera), rarely herbaceous climbers. Indumentum usually of simple hairs, often glandular on young parts, buds, and inflorescences. Leaves alternate, usually estipulate; leaf blade pinnate or digitate, rarely simple; leaflets alternate to opposite, entire or dentate to serrate. Inflorescence a terminal or axillary thyrse; bracts and bracteoles small. Flowers unisexual, rarely polygamous or bisexual, actinomorphic or zygomorphic, usually small. Sepals 4 or 5(or 6), equal or unequal, free or connate at base, imbricate or valvate. Petals 4 or 5(or 6), sometimes absent, free, imbricate, usually clawed, often with scales or hair-tufted basal appendages. Disk conspicuous, fleshy, complete or interrupted, lobed or annular, rarely absent. Stamens 5–10(–74), usually 8, rarely numerous, variously inserted but usually within disk, often exserted in male flowers; filaments free, rarely connate; anthers dorsifixed, longitudinally dehiscent, introrse; staminodes sometimes present in carpellate flowers, but filaments shorter and anthers with a thick wall, indehiscent. Ovary superior, (1–)3(or 4)-loculed; ovules 1 or 2(or several) per locule, placentation axile, rarely parietal, anatropous, campylotropous, or amphitropous; style usually apical (ter- minal), semigynobasic in Allophylus [gynobasic in Deinbollia Schumacher & Thonning]; stigma entire or 2 or 3(or 4)-lobed, usually rudimentary in male flowers. Fruit a loculicidal capsule, berry, or drupe, or consisting of 2 or 3 samaras, often 1-seeded and 1- loculed by abortion. Seeds 1(or 2 or more) per locule; testa black or brown, hard, often with a conspicuous fleshy aril or sarcotesta; embryo curved, plicate, or twisted, oily and starchy; endosperm usually absent.
    [Show full text]
  • Sapindaceae Sapindaceae Juss., Gen.: 246 (1789), Nom
    Sapindaceae Sapindaceae Juss., Gen.: 246 (1789), nom. cons., “Sapindi”. Aceraceae Juss. (1789), nom. cons. Hippocastanaceae A. Rich. (1823), nom. cons. P. ACEVEDO-RODRI´GUEZ,P.C.VAN W ELZEN,F.ADEMA, AND R.W.J.M. VAN DER HAM Trees, treelets, shrubs, lianas or herbaceous clim- a septifragal or loculicidal capsule, a schizocarp bers; cork superficial; stems of climbing species with winged or non-winged mericarps, baccate or (i.e., Serjania, Paullinia, Urvillea, Houssayanthus, rarely a drupe. Seeds sessile or exceptionally (Dis- and Thinouia) usually with multiple vascular tichostemon) subtended by a funiculus, variously cylinders. Leaves pinnately or ternately compound shaped, exalate or rarely winged, naked, with a or palmate, or rarely simple, alternate, rarely partial to complete sarcotesta, or an arillode opposite; proximal leaflets seldom reduced, re- (arising from the integuments); embryo oily or flexed, and covering the stem to resemble a pair starchy, lacking endosperm, notorhizal or loma- of stipules (pseudostipules), distal leaflet in most torhizal with straight, curved or plicate, fleshy arboreal and shrubby species rudimentary; sti- cotyledons, the radicle often separated by a deep pules present only in climbing species, minute fold in the testa that forms a radicular pocket. to large. Inflorescences axillary, terminal, pseudo- Mostly tropical or subtropical, with a few terminal, cauliflorous or ramiflorous, thyrso- genera extending to sub-temperate zones; 141 paniculate, racemose, spicate, or fasciculate, or genera and about 1,900 species.
    [Show full text]